This document evaluates an in-service teacher training program for integrating information and communication technology (ICT) using Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model. At level 1, over 96% of teachers rated the training positively. At level 2, teachers' self-assessed readiness for using ICT in teaching increased after the training. At level 3, many teachers reported changes in how they prepared and conducted lessons integrating ICT. At level 4, the training impacted schools by increasing teacher collaboration around ICT integration, though the specific impacts were unclear. Overall, the majority of teachers were satisfied with the training and used more ICT in their instruction after completing it.

1. Evaluation of an In-service Teacher Training Program for ICT Integration Kirkpatrick’s Model Done by: Abeer AL Maawali2910 Amal AL Hosni2931

2. Evaluation of an In-service Teacher Training Program for ICT Integration Model used in the study: The evaluation framework is based on Kirkpatrick's Four Levels Training Evaluation Model.

3. Evaluation of an In-service Teacher Training Program for ICT Integration Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate a nationwide implemented teacher professional development program in Taiwan.

4. Evaluation of an In-service Teacher Training Program for ICT Integration Level 1: Reacted to the training The aim of this level is to know whether the intended curriculum is successfully delivered in the training. In the end-of-training questionnaire, shows more than 96% of the teachers rated all four items either excellent or good. That is , the teachers considered the training focused on ICT integration, providing teaching strategies, illustrating effective use of ICT, and offering opportunities to collaborate with other teachers. It shows that the train-the-trainer model seems to be a feasible implementation model.

5. Evaluation of an In-service Teacher Training Program for ICT Integration Level 2: Learned from the training One way to look into what teachers learned from the training is to compare what they know (or feel) before and after the training. In the end-of-training questionnaire, the teachers were asked to assess their own readiness for using ICT in teaching before and after they received the training. The results show that most teachers rated their readiness one level up on each item after the training.