This document provides information and guidelines about pilot testing a survey instrument. It explains that pilot testing involves trying out the survey on a small number of respondents similar to the actual target population to check for issues like unclear wording, questions that make people uncomfortable, and length of time to complete the survey. The document recommends pilot testing with at least 25-75 people and includes tips for conducting a retrospective interview after respondents complete the survey to get feedback on their understanding of each question.
OLEH: NUR FAZLIN BINTI MOHD NAIM
Ini merupakan sebahagian daripada sub topik untuk subjek GPP1063 Pengantar Pengajian Profesional yang dipelajari oleh para guru pelatih di semua Institut Pendidikan Guru pada semester kedua PPISMP.
Harapan saya semoga perkongsian ini dapat membantu anda terutamanya para guru pelatih IPG bagi topik ini.
By the end of this presentation you should be able to:
Describe different types of data collection techniques
Demonstrate dimensions , type of observations and how to prepare and conduct observation
Understand the practical communication skills for interviews to ask good questions , probe and follow up questions .
Able to prepare for interview
Understand the characteristics and uses of focus group discussions
Conduct focus group discussions
OLEH: NUR FAZLIN BINTI MOHD NAIM
Ini merupakan sebahagian daripada sub topik untuk subjek GPP1063 Pengantar Pengajian Profesional yang dipelajari oleh para guru pelatih di semua Institut Pendidikan Guru pada semester kedua PPISMP.
Harapan saya semoga perkongsian ini dapat membantu anda terutamanya para guru pelatih IPG bagi topik ini.
By the end of this presentation you should be able to:
Describe different types of data collection techniques
Demonstrate dimensions , type of observations and how to prepare and conduct observation
Understand the practical communication skills for interviews to ask good questions , probe and follow up questions .
Able to prepare for interview
Understand the characteristics and uses of focus group discussions
Conduct focus group discussions
Research tool that becomes a means of collecting information for the study is called a research tool or a research instrument. For example, Inquiry form: questionnaires, opinionnaire, attitude scales, checklists, rating scales, scorecards and schedules.
ACTIVITY 1
Chosen Research Design: Qualitative
Why do you think this design is appropriate to your research interest?
Based on my understanding of qualitative research, I believe it can be appropriate for certain types of research questions. In my view, qualitative research is particularly useful for exploring complex phenomena, gaining insights into people's experiences and perspectives, and developing theory. I also recognize that it can be valuable in applied settings, such as healthcare or social work, where understanding people's experiences is crucial for improving practice.
Guide Questions
1. Did you remember the research design listed in the table?
YES, I have remembered all the research design listed in the table.
2. What other research designs did you recall which is/ are not listed in the table?
Longitudinal Study
Cross-sectional Study
Survey Research
Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Grounded Theory
Ethnographic Research
3. Was it easy or hard to determine the research design to be used in your selected topic or interest?
For me, it is easy because in the first place I already have an idea where to start. I believe when you select a topic, you already considered what design you will use.
4. What are the factors that you consider in selecting a research design for your study?
As a researcher, I must consider various factors when selecting a qualitative research design for my study. These include the research question, the purpose of the study, the nature of the phenomenon being studied, and the available resources and time frame. Additionally, I must reflect on my own philosophical and theoretical perspectives to ensure that the chosen design aligns with my worldview and research goals.
Reflection
How does research design make your study colorful/ interesting?
As a researcher, I have come to appreciate how qualitative research design can add color and interest to a study. By using methods such as open-ended interviews, observations, and document analysis, I can capture the rich and complex experiences, perspectives, and contexts of the participants. This type of research allows me to delve deeper into the phenomenon being studied and gain a more nuanced understanding of it.
One of the benefits of using qualitative research is the ability to create vivid descriptions, quotes, and narratives that add depth and meaning to the study. It's fascinating to see how the data can come to life and offer a unique perspective on the topic. Additionally, I've found that unexpected findings often emerge during qualitative research, which can add to the intrigue and interest of the study.
Overall, I believe that qualitative research design offers a powerful way to explore the intricacies and nuances of human experience. It enables me to create a study that is more compelling and engaging, as well as provides insights that cannot be obtained through other research methods.
ACTIVITY 2: TELL ME THE QUANTITY
Directions: Read the qu
Every research question needs an appropriate or suitable research method.
A given question may be answered with more than one method, but a given
research method is not necessarily appropriate for all questions. In other
words, for most research questions one has a choice of possible methods but
this choice is usually limited. One of the first tasks of the researcher – after
carefully specifying the research question – is to select a suitable method. This
selection must be done not only according to technical criteria (i.e., the degree of
compatibility between question and method), but also practical considerations.
These latter might include the amount of time available to do the research; the
resources available in terms of both people and materials; the circumstances
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2. Maksud & Matlamat
• Merupakan fasa terakhir tinjauan sebelum
pengumpulan data bermula.
• Matlamatnya adalah untuk mencari masalah d
alam soal selidik, termasuk soalan yang
lemah, arahan yang tidak lengkap dan item
yang sukar dijawab.
3. Garis Panduan
1. Tidak boleh gunakan kumpulan fokus sebenar.
2. Untuk kajian baharu, lakukan dua kali ujian rintis.
3. Jumlah responden tidak ditentukan dengan
tepat, dicadangkan sekurang-kurangnya 25
orang, lebih baik antara 50 – 75 orang.
• Responden mewakili sample sebenar kajian;
• Bilangan responden: Minimum 30 orang;
• Data kajian rintis digunakan untuk menentukan
kebolehpercayaan instrumen.
4. Tujuan
1. Kajian rintis hendaklah dijalankan terhadap
instrumen yang telah dibina;
2. Tujuan kajian rintis dijalankan adalah untuk:
– Menguji tempoh yang diperlukan untuk
menjawab soalselidik;
– Menyemak semua item dan arahan agar jelas;
– Menggugurkan item-item yang tidak
menghasilkan data yang diperlukan.
5. Contoh Soalan Responden Kajian
Rintis
1. Berapa lamakah masa yang anda perlukan untuk
menjawab soalselidik?
2. Adakah arahan jelas?
3. Adakah terdapat item-item yang kabur? Jika ada,
nyatakan item mana dan kenapa?
4. Adakah terdapat mana-mana item yang anda tidak ingin
menjawab?
5. Pada pandangan anda, adakah terdapat topik utama yang
ditnggalkan?
6. Adakah keseluruhan (layout) soalselidik jelas dan
menarik?
7. Adakah komen-komen lain yang anda ingin kemukakan?
6. Pilot Testing
What is pilot testing?
Basically, pilot testing means finding out if your
survey, key informant interview guide
or observation form will work in the “real world”
by trying it out first on a few people.
7. Why pilot test?
The purpose is to make sure that everyone in
your sample not only understands the
questions, but understands them in the same
way. This way, too, you can see if any
questions make respondents feel uncomfortable.
You’ll also be able to find out how
long it takes to complete the survey in real time.
8. When to pilot test?
Once you have a version your project is happy
with, but before training your data
collectors about how to administer it. (During
data collector training you will want to
conduct another type of test—a field test. In that
case you are testing your team, rather
than the instrument. But that is another story…)
9. Who to test it on?
People that represent the various subgroups within your
intended sample. Remember,
you want to make sure that everyone will understand your
data collection instrument
in the same way. So if you plan to conduct a representative
public opinion survey, you
might want to include both old and young people, well-
educated and less educated,
native English speakers and recent immigrants in your test
sample. At a minimum,
involve several people from each subgroup so their views can
be confirmed by others.
10. How to conduct the test?
There are a number of ways to find out how
people are understanding the data
collection instrument.
11. Retrospective Interview
1. Administer the survey in the same way and under similar conditions as you plan
to do for actual data collection. Record the start and end time so you can tell
how long it took to complete each survey.
2. Pay attention to instances when respondents hesitate to answer or ask for
clarification, as this may be an indication that questions or answers are too
vague, difficult to understand or have more than one meaning. Make a note of
where this occurs.
3. After the respondent finishes the survey, explain that you’d now like to ask how
s/he understood each question and response choice. Go over the survey again,
and for each question, have the respondent tell you what s/he thinks is being
asked. Based on your observations, ask about instances when the person
hesitated or needed clarification. For example if they struggled with the May 2011 http://programeval.ucdavis.edu 2
question, “How many adults live in your household?” they might explain: “I was
counting 5 adults, but I wasn’t sure whether I should say 5 or 6 because I also
have an uncle staying with us occasionally and I didn’t know if that counted as a
person living in my household or not.” You could follow by asking about
wording that would have been clearer.
4. For questions with multiple response choices, ask if there are any other choices
that should be listed. If there is a question where a number of respondents
specified an “other” answer, see if what they said is a more likely response
choice than the ones you provided.
5. You might also look into the cultural sensitivity and relevance of the survey by
asking if there was anything objectionable in the survey, or if any of the
examples in the questions were not relevant or appropriate for their culture. You
might also ask if the sequence of the questions either encouraged or discouraged
their desire to continue with the survey.
6. The feedback on the instrument can be done by asking one respondent at a time
or by conducting a focus group with the participants in the pilot test. Just as with
the individual respondents, ask every member of the group to tell you in their
words what each question was asking and why some may have stumbled over
any of the questions. Together, the group can come up with possible alternatives
question or answer wording.