Jeffrey Macdonald Murder Case

Jeffrey Macdonald Murder Case
Jeffrey Robert MacDonald was a U.S. Army officer and a medical doctor who was convicted in 1979 of murdering his pregnant wife and two
daughters in February 1970. The reason why I chose this case is because this murder case is said to be one of America's most enduring murder
mysteries and the main topic of a best–selling book. Not only this, but I also chose this case because it took about 9 years for Macdonald to be finally
convicted and the U.S army got involved and made their own investigation because they didn't believe his story. This meant that this case had many
twists and turns, making it a mysterious case that's very intriguing and wanting to know more about.
The Fort Bragg police arrive at the MacDonald resident in response to an emergency call from Jeffrey MacDonald in the morning of February 17,
1970 at 3;42am. What they find is insanity and murder...Colette MacDonald, Kimberley MacDonald, and Kristen MacDonald are all murdered in
their bedrooms. The scene described by first responders was "horrific". Since that day in February, MacDonald has worn two public faces, one of evil
and one of injustice.
To begin with, at the murder scene Colette MacDonald is found in the master bedroom and on the headboard of the bed is the word "PIG" written
with her own blood. Her body was violently stabbed 21 times by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He first stated that he had fallen asleep in the living room and he woke up to loud screaming. He was attacked by three men as he made his way to
the master bedroom. He said that along with the men was a woman wearing a wig and white relaxed hat and was constantly shouting : "KILL THE
PIGS... Acid is groovy". MacDonald and the three male attackers eventually created a struggle, and they attacked MacDonald with a knife, club and
ice pick. He said that he ripped his pajama top and used it as a shield to attempt to protect himself from the weapon
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Esther Johnson Murder Case
John Tyler, age 28, was shot and killed with a handgun, fired by Jeff "Ace" Johnson, on July 16th. The shooting occurred after an argument between
Jeff (age 20 and a member of the Cobras street gang) and Jerry Knight (age 22, member of the Jukers street gang and cousin of the deceased). The
accused may be convicted of either murder (the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought) or voluntary manslaughter
(the unlawful killing of a human being without malice). After reviewing all the facts of the case, I have come to the conclusion that Jeff "Ace" Johnson
is guilty of voluntary manslaughter.
Intent or aforethought is a major difference between murder and manslaughter; murder is intentional and/or planned while

Case Analysis : Simpson Murder Case
he O. J. Simpson murder case (officially called the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson) was a criminal trial held in Los
Angeles County, California Superior Court from January 29 to October 3, 1995. Where the Former American football star/actor O. J. Simpson was
tried on two counts of murder following the June, 1994 deaths of his ex–wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The case was
one of the most publicized criminal trial in American history. Simpson was acquitted after a trial that lasted over nine months which was presided over
by Judge Lance Ito.
Sometime after ten o 'clock on the Sunday night of June 12, 1994, it is believed that a single male entered Nicole Brown Simpson 's condo on
through a back entrance. In a small, nearly enclosed area near the front gate, the man brutally slashed Nicole's neck, almost severing her from her
body. The man then struggled and repeatedly stabbed Ronald Goldman. Ronald Goldman an acquaintance of Nicole 's, who had come to her
condominium to return a pair of sunglasses that her mother had left earlier that evening a restaurant. Just after midnight, Nicole 's dog a howling
Akita, was spotted with blood on its belly and legs, was found by a neighbor, who went to return the dog back to the home the neighbor discovered the
two bodies. The investigation of the Brown–Simpson and Goldman murders began
Nicole Brown Simpson 's ex–husband, a former football and media personality O. J. Simpson, was on

Hae's Murder Case Summary
Adnan and Jay are both guilty of Hae's murder, because they were engaged in criminal acts such as smoking Marijuana, and they both lied and seemed
suspicious in this case. Hangul 1980–1999, was a Woodlawn High School senior in Baltimore, Maryland who disappeared on January 13, 1999. Her
body was found February 9, 1999, in Leakin Park, the victim of murder by manual strangulation. Adnan Masud Syed, her ex–boyfriend, was convicted
of first degree murder and was serving a life sentence plus 30 years. Syed was granted a new trial in July 2016. Her murder initially generated only
local interest until it was the subject of the podcast Serial in 2014, which brought international attention to Syed's trial.Hae Min Lee was born in South
Korea in 1980 and emigrated with her mother Youn Kim and her brother Leeto to the United States in 1992 to live with her grandparents. Lee attended
the magnet program at Woodlawn High School near Baltimore, Maryland. She was an athlete ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On February 9, 1999, Lee's body was found by a passerby in Leakin Park. On February 1, 1999, the Baltimore County Police received an anonymous
phone call suggesting that Lee's ex–boyfriend, Adnan Masud Syed, was responsible for her murder, and that Syed had threatened to kill Lee On
February 3, Baltimore Police received call records for a cell phone belonging to Syed. They noticed a number of calls on the day of Lee's
disappearance to a woman named Jen Pusateri. When questioned, Pusateri told police that a friend of hers, Jay Wilds, who had known Syed from
high school, told her that Syed had killed Lee. The police questioned Wilds, who told them that he had helped Syed bury Lee's body and dispose of
her car. Syed was arrested on February 28, 1999, and charged with first degree murder. Officers also interviewed the man that discovered the victim's

Summary: The Jonbenet Murder Case
The JonBenet murder case was an unsolved case that originated in 1996. JonBenet was killed on December 26, 1996 by an unknown assailant. Her
body was found in the basement of her current residence. Although the case has never been solved, many theories support multiple ideas on how this
six–year–old girl was murdered.
JonBenet was found dead, wrapped in sheets in the basement of her home by her father John Ramsey. Patsy Ramsey (The Mother) called early in the
morning saying to the police dispatcher that her child was kidnapped. A ransom note was left on the staircase inside their home. The ransom stated that
a small foreign faction had taken their daughter, and if they wanted her back, they would have to pay $118,000 for her safe return. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The note said that the family must pay $118,000 for her return. This amount was the exact same amount as the bonus Mr. Ramsey received for
Christmas. This seemed strange to investigators. Why make a wealthy family who had millions of dollars only pay a percentage of that money? And
how did they know how much that bonus was? This made it seem that the crime was illustrated by close friends or maybe even a member of the
family. I believe that JonBenet was murdered by her older brother Burk Ramsey, and her parents covered up the killing to protect their child. The
evidence shows that the person who wrote the letter was highly educated, over the age of 30, and was a female. Other evidence proves that the
author knew the family extremely well. JonBenet was killed by someone she knew, if a stranger broke into the house, she would have alerted
everyone in the home and woke them up. I believe that Burk killed his sister by accident after the ate some of his food and he lost his temper. Burk
is known to have aspergers syndrome. This makes Burk over exaggerate with his emotions and display the incorrectly. JonBenet was killed by a
flashlight blow to the head that was found in the kitchen. There was a cover up to make it seem that it was strangulation. Why would the kidnappers
kill the girl when they were after money the entire

The Murder Of Simpson Case
The O.J. Simpson case was a very publicised case and is still talked about today. OJ was charged with the murder of his ex Nicole Brown Simpson
and her friend Ronald Lyle Goldman. This review will go through the investigative process, and its major elements, that was undertaken throughout
this case. It will discuss major flaws and weaknesses in the investigation and how they affected the case. It will then go on to give suggestion for
ways in which these investigative failures could have been overcome, and how these failures could be prevented in future homicide investigations
much alike this one. It will lastly discuss the role of the media in influencing the outcome of this case. This review will provide insight on this
legendary case, and overall suggest how justice could have been served, and should be served in the future.
The Arrest was the first element of the case. OJ Simpson was charged of two counts of murder, but was not arrested. He remained at large and was
considered a fugitive. When police spotted a white bronco, a car that resembled Simpsons friends car Al Cowlings, a police chase began. Simpson
was reportedly in the passenger seat with a gun. The vehicle reached Simpson 's house, that 's where police negotiations were made. Simpson
surrendered, he was arrested and sent to jail, no bail.
His plead of innocence was made shortly after this. He claimed that he did not kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman. He claimed to be
deeply

The Liana White's Murder Case
On July 12, 2005, Liana White, wife and mother, disappeared in northern Edmonton. At 5:45 am that morning a woman called to report an
abandoned car, left open with personal effects, including Mrs. White's licence, scattered around it (Edmonton Journal, 2007, para. 2, 4). The next
day her husband, Michael White, made a public plea for his wife's return as they continued searching for her whereabouts (Harding & Shaw, 2005,
Timeline of Events, para. 3). By July 14, Michael had become a suspect and the police were all too happy when he decided to lead a search party of
his own, in the hopes that, if Michael was in fact the reason for Mrs. White's disappearance, he would lead them right to her (Edmonton Journal, 2007,
A Turning Point., para. 14).... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 2000 Michael had to payout $34,000 to the government for crashing a car, two years earlier, on an Edmonton military base. Since then they have
continued to have financial troubles with $336,000 worth of outstanding debt for their two vehicles and housing mortgage (para. 10, 11). This
could have created some anger or frustration in Michael since society has an exceedingly patriarchal mindset and he may have experienced feelings
of failure, not living up to set gender roles in providing for the family. If he believed in the cultural values of male dominance, than having debt, and
for so long could have been a catalyst. Slowly, knowing that he was not performing well at providing for his family, Michael may have been
becoming increasingly dissatisfied until he finally decided to take action. It has been shown that men resort to violence as a resource to re–establish
order in situations where it has been disrupted, in a way to avoid endangering their male status (Brookman, 2005, p. 152). Similarly, it has been shown
that communities with male– dominant norms have presented higher rates of spousal assault than areas where men and woman are equal (Pozzulo,
Bennell, & Forth, 2015, p. 356). So Michael White's actions could partially be explained by him trying to regain status in his house by showing
control over his wife when he could not control their debt. It renewed his sense of power when he was losing it

Murder Case : Murder Cases Of All Time
O.J Simpson's murder case is known to be one of the most famous murder cases of all time. The case is about the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson
and Ronald Goldman being stabbed to death. The murder case was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in California, the
trial lasted from November 2, 1994 to January 24, 1995. The former professional football star and actor O.J Simpson as tried on two counts of murder,
the death of his ex–wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman, in June 1994. The police accumulated enough evidence indicating
Simpson's guilt in the murders and placed a warrant for his arrest. On July 22, 1994, Simpson was asked the question in the Courtroom, "How do you
plead." He followed this question with the statement, "Absolutely one hundred percent not guilty, Your Honor." On October 3, 1995 the jury's verdict
stated "We the jury in the above entitled action find the defendant, Orenthal James Simpson, not guilty of the crime of murder."
I believe that with evidence provided, O.J. Simpson should have been prosecuted. Aristotle defines "the supreme good as an activity of the rational
soul in accordance with virtue." I agree with this quote because I do not believe that O.J Simpson is a virtuous person. A virtuous person is some one
who conforms to the moral and ethical principles of life. I do not think that O.J Simpson did the moral thing in killing his ex wife and the waiter. I do
not think that the jury did the

Murders In Illinois: A Case Study
People go missing all the time and are found in just a short amount of time. But what about the people who go missing and are never found again?
Murders in Illinois are more common than not. In these four cases, the individual goes missing mysteriously and are recovered in pieces or not at
all. How does this happen? People may never know but the families will keep fighting until someone gives them an answer. Fay Rawley of
Summum, IL was a township supervisor for Woodland Township, serving on the Fulton County Board of Supervisors. He was also a wealthy farmer
and land owner which made him very well known in his neighborhood by old and young people. Rawley was always assisting those in need of a
helping hand and was known for being "lenient"... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Police states that Kim was last seen walking along Route 116 but never arrived to her cousin's house and was never seen again after that. One
month after her disappearance in July of 1983, her clothing and wallet were found approximately three miles from London Mills in the Spoon
River. Donald Leroy Evans claimed to be McClaskey's killer in 1993 but authorities are uncertain if Evan's statements are true. He told a reporter
that McClaskey's remains could be found in Iowa near the Quad Cities but this also has never been proven. However, skeletal remains were
discovered in Fulton County and investigators initially believed that the remains were those of McClaskey until a DNA test ruled out this theory.
Convicted murderer William Reinbold was believed to be connected to the case as well. Authorities stated that he has a history of attacking young
brunette women, just like Kimberly. Reinbold, however, has never been charged in connection with McClaskey's disappearance and is scheduled
to be released from an Illinois prison in the year of 2019 (5). Yet, in September of 2006, new DNA testing was done on the skull that was found in
Fulton County (8). This testing proved that earlier DNA testing was false and that the skull was in fact Kimberly McClaskey's. With this being said,
in August of 2007, a Fulton County coroner's jury ruled her death a homicide (8). Police reports state that Kimberly was about 5"1" weighing
around 98 pounds with brown hair and hazel eyes. She has a 4 inch burn scar on her upper left thigh, a mole on the left side of her neck, and both ears
are pierced three times each. Kimberly Dawn McClaskey's case still remains unsolved

The Vermont Murder Case
The case of The Vermont Murder.
Vanessa Vermont, a gorgeous woman found dead in her own kitchen, laying on the floor with a fatal head wound on the back of her head. Just
recently she bought a new broiler and need and outlet over her kitchen counter, something her husband could do. And it is right where she was
murdered. There is also a woman's briefcase on the floor near the kitchen. Which means Mrs. Vermont was leaving, which in turn could've enraged the
husband.
My report will show that Mr. Vermont killed his wife Vanessa Vermont in cold blood.
My first piece of evidence is the suitcase on the floor just outside the kitchen. It has flowers on it which means it is Mrs. Vermont's suitcase. As a rule
this shows Mrs. Vermont was leaving her husband. Mr. Vermont saw the suitcase, confronted Mrs. Vermont about it and killed her.
... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Vermont. It was ripped out of the phone with a lot of force and violence. The phone is also damaged on one end like it hit something hard and with
force. It is also the closest thing to Mrs. Vermont. As a rule this is themurder weapon that was used by Mr. Vermont tokill Mrs. Vermont. After Mr.
Vermont found out Mrs. Vermont was leaving him, he ripped the phone out of the receiver and hit Mrs. Vermont on the back of the head with it
Killing her out of pure rage.
My third piece of evidence is the kitchen. It is an absolute mess. There are broken plates, newspapers everywhere, an overturned chair, and the phone
ripped out of the receiver. As a rule that means there was a struggle or fight before the blow to the head. When Mr. Vermont confronted Mrs. Vermont
before he killed her, they got into a

The Aarushi Talwar Murder Case
Sociology Assignment
Honor Killing
An honor killing is the homicide of a member of a family by other members, due to the perpetrators' belief that the victim has brought shame or
dishonor upon the family, or has violated the principles of a community or a religion, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage,
being in a relationship that is disapproved by their family, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are
deemed inappropriate, or engaging in homosexual relations.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing)
There are many Cases of Honor killing all over the world but for me the most shocking incident was the Aarushi TalwarMurder Case. That incident
shocked the whole nation as a 16 year old girl was murdered and the most interesting part is that the blame was on her father to kill her. With this, one
more dead body was found and that was of their servant. After all this the blame was again on father that he has killed his daughter and servant as he
saw both of them in a compromising position. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This incident happened on 16 may 2008. Aarushi was found murdered in her bed. It was said that a fatal blow was delivered to her head and that her
throat was slit. 'Nothing abnormal' was detected in her sexual organs. On 17th may Hemraj's (Servant) body was found on the terrace, his body was in
a state of decay.
On 23rd may, Noida police arrested Rajesh Talwar (Father) for the double murder case. CBI takes over this case; and Arun kumar is the investigating
officer. 12th June Rajesh talwar's assistant Krishna administrated a narco analysis test. Next day, Krishna gets

A Summary Of Peyton's Murder Case
I have researched a case that had happened here in my own town not long ago a good man we called (Pops) was shot and killed. I am very familiar
with this whole case and the news does not tell the whole story. Kegerran Peyton and Darion Watts was caught on camera walking into the store a
number of times, then the third time Peyton walked into the store and put a hundred dollar bill on the counter and asked to buy a pack of cigarettes,
when Nilkanth Patil turned to get the pack of Newport's Peyton pulled a gun from his waist line and shot Patil in cold blood in the back of the neck,
then turned and shot another person that was in the store he was taking to Hattiesburg hospital and later released. I was not working at the Sheriff's
office at

Partial Defense In Murder Cases
The need for partial defence in murder cases has evolved through the common law and statue, in consideration of the weaknesses of the human mind to
take control when faced with provocation and the challenges created by mental illness, which may result to serious violent. Court in England and Wales
have experienced several difficulties in defining what "intention" (human mind) is in order to establish conviction for murder (R v Molony) 1985. This
essay will therefore, discuss the need for partial defences to murder as "a buffer against the harsh effect of the mandatory life sentence for all cases of
murder" in England and Wales.
In England and Wales, murder is established (mens rea) where there is an act of the defendant, that causes the death ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The defendant have to satisfy all the provisions of section 54 of the Coroners and Justice Act; according to justice; "the first feature of section 54 is
that it identifies three statutory components (or ingredients) to the "loss of control" defence. We begin by emphasising that each is integral to it. If
one is absent, the defence fails" R v Collins. The new defence improves the control the trial judge has over whether or not there is sufficient evidence
to raise a defence of loss of control. This is because the judge must consider whether the evidence submitted by the Defendant has a chance of
succeeding in front of a jury in

Alphabet Murder Case Essay
The lives of three young girls were taken in the city of Rochester, New York, during the 1970's. Detectives could not identify this vicious killer, who
is known as the alphabet murder. This vicious murder did not only destroyed the lives of three young girls, but also the lives of their families too. The
alphabet murder case is an interesting case for the following reasons, the history of the young girl's lives, the evidence the detectives have gathered off
the young girl's body and the killers reasoning and or emotions about when he took the young girls.
To begin with, the alphabet murder is interesting because of the history of the victims. For instance, Carmen Colon was the first victim, Carmen came
from a poor catholic family, she ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The authorities never found any evidence at the crime sense of either victims. The evidence that the detectives do have is that there might be two
alphabet murders. The reason the detectives think this is because of how the young girls were found. For example, Carmen Colon was the first
victim, she went missing on the evening of November 16th, 1971. When Carmen was supposed to be getting medications in Bull's head,
Rochester, for her grandfather, she would never be seen again. Carmen found the next day and was not feed, was not clothed, sexually assaulted,
had bruises all over her body and was strangled by the killers hands. Wanda would be the next victim 17 months later, she was taken on April 2nd,
1973, when she was supposed to be getting groceries for her mother. Lastly, would be Michelle, who was taken on November 26th, 1973 on her way
home from school. Unlike Carmen, the other two girls were feed, were clothed, sexually assaulted also, had little to no bruises, and were strangled
with a belt. One important piece of evidence is that the detective suspected there could be two alphabet killers. One of those they believe could be
Carmen Colon's uncle, Miguel Colon. Detectives think this because he avoided being questioned about Carmen's death, his alibi was

Johnny's Murder Case Study
JOHNNY'S DEFENSE OF BOB'S MURDER In Johnny's defense I think the death of Bob wasn't on purpose. Johnny was just defending his good
friend Ponyboy Curtis. Ponyboy was almost going to drown to death if it wasn't for Johnny. My thought is that Johnny killed Bob off his reaction
like Johnny didn't know what to do! The main reason why Johnny killed bob was because Bob was telling david to drown Ponyboy. For example
Bob said " give this greaser a bath". Also Johnny was going to be drown to death next if he hadn't done anything to stop it. So for nothing to happen
to Johnny and Ponyboy Johnny had to do what he had to do. Plus Johnny has been jumped by Bob before this even happened. The reason why was
because Bob was just bored. Also Johnny

Unlawful Murder Case
Answer
When taking a look at the case this particular incident would fall under the unlawful act and criminally negligent homicide. The young man made the
mistake of pointing what the thought was an unloading handgun at one of his friends then pulling the trigger and killing him. As a gun owner, it is
his responsibility to make sure that the weapon is unloaded regardless even if it was not loaded the day before. Is the question that is this an unlawful
killing? The answer would be yes. Murder is considered an unlawful act, so this would also consider murder. It could be looked at as murder with
special circumstances. However, unlawful acts are crimes that constitute both misdemeanor and felonies and that includes murder no matter if was
accidental

Eddie Leonski Murder Case
Eddie Leonski
Many serial killers are diagnosed with a mental disorder and others are considered to kill without a psychological motive. People who tend to commit
crimes of injustice in the topic of murder usually have an underlying reason whether it is psychological or not. Serial Killers are in no way justified in
the case of insanity. Eddie Leonski was a murderer who tried to justify his crimes with a plea of insanity but he wasn't found clinically insane and was
hung for his crimes in 1942. Eddie is always first considered as a United States Army Soldier before he is listed as a murderer. This Soldier was a
loveable guy who had a lot of friends with him along the way of his rank. None of Eddie's friends or fellow soldiers had ever suspected ... Show more
Eventually Eddie had developed a drinking problem. On May 3, 1942 the horror story came to life when the body of Ivy Mcleod, age 40, was found
in Albourne park, Melbourne. Ivy Mcleod was found beaten and strangled to death with her clothes torn off. Eddie Leonski had no time to rape the
victim as he heard footsteps and ran off. The witness had only seen an army uniform and nothing else as he stumbled upon the scene, as he described
to the police. Investigators of the crime had known that the motive was nowhere near robbery due to Ivy Mcleod's purse and everything in it being
with her. "She stepped back into the doorway and i grabbed her. I grabbed her neck and changed the position of my hand so that the thumbs were at her
throat – and i choked her," stated Eddie. Only six days after the first victim the nightmare continued as Pauline Thompson was found her neck and
strangled to death lying on the steps of her own home. Pauline was a loved mother of two and the wife of a cop. Pauline had met Eddie Leonski in
a cafe and had left with him for drinks. Later that night she had started singing to Eddie which had seemed to trigger something in him. "She was
singing in my ear. It sounded as if she were singing for me. She had a nice voice," Eddie declared, "I grabbed her, i grabbed her. I don't know why."
The third and last victim of Eddie Leonski, Gladys Hosking, was found outside of where the soldiers were stationed on may 18, only 350 meters
away from her boarding house. All of the victims of Eddie's had been strangled and their clothes tattered. Several more women spoke up to surviving
attacks, confirmed to be committed by Eddie Leonski. Eddie had an odd obsession with women's voices and had claimed to have killed his victims to
"get to their voices." The victims of these murders were considerably older than Eddie and investigators and psychologists all linked his motivation
back to his

Marin Bryant Murder Case
On Saturday the 28–29 of April 1996 a killing spree occurred in which 35 people were killed and 23 wounded. Marin Bryant, a 28 year old
committed a shooting at the popular tourist site, Port Arthur former prison colony, and was found guilty and given 35 life sentences without possibility
of parole. Byrant took the life of his first victims David and Noelene Martin who he choked and then shot due to possibility that they triggered his
father's suicide. His father had tried to purchase a bed and breakfast property called Seascape but the Martins brought this property before his father
could ready his finances. This disappointed Byrant's father who believed the Martins "double–dealed" to secure the purchase. Byrant offered to buy
another property ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He shot them at close range, killing both instantly. He then fired at Mick Sargent skimming his scalp and violently knocking him to the floor. His
fourth shot was fired at Sargent's girlfriend killing her instantly by hitting her in the back of the head. Bryant turned towards Jason Winter's wife Joanne
and their 15–month–old son Mitchell, Jason Winter, a 28–year–old New Zealand winemaker who had been helping at the busy cafe, threw a serving
tray at Byrant in an attempt to distract him. Joanne Winter's father pushed his daughter and grandson to the floor taking safety under the table.
The only two police officers stationed in Peninsula were attending a fake emergency call at Saltwater River when they received a radio message to
attend Port Arthur and be on the lookout for a yellow Volvo. They headed in different cars and taking different routes to the scene. At about 2:00pm,
they were at Seascape and could see a BMW on fire. They were fired upon due to the trap they had fallen into and had to hide in a ditch at the side of
the road. Byrant fired at them whenever they attempted to escape and were unable to move from that position for many

Alphabet Murders Case Study
Unsolved Case of the Alphabet Murders During the 1970's, a chilling series of events had the people of New York on edge. The citizens around
Rochester were particularly anxious. Three victims in the surrounding areas had been discovered, each with double initials. The unsolved case of the
Alphabet Murders leaves the people of New York inquisitive and horrified to this day. 10–year–old Carmen Colon was the first to disappear on
November 16, 1971. She was said to have walked alone to the pharmacy earlier that day, to pick up a prescription for her stepsister. She had to wait
at least an hour before the medicine was ready, so she left the pharmacy to run other errands. However, she never returned to pick up the prescription,
nor came back home. "When 5PM rolls around, Carmen's worried grandparents and mother begin searching for her. A team of fortypolice officers joins
them, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An 11–year–old girl who was discovered April 3, 1973, after she disappeared the day before. She had been seen walking near the railroad with her
best friend, Kimmy. Wanda had become paranoid that someone was following them. She informed Kimmy to run home as fast as she can. They both
made it safely and told Kimmy's mother to contact the police (Roy and Mackenzie). However, two days later, Wanda was sent on a grocery run.
When she doesn't return, her sister and a schoolmate go out looking for her, while her mother reported her missing. "Witnesses place a brown car
and Wanda together after she left the deli. Soon after, authorities discover her body at a rest area access road that's ten miles away" (Roy and
Mackenzie). Detectives placed the two cases of Carmen Colon and Wanda Walkowicz together. Many hearts sank when they found everything had lined
up identically. Wanda had also been raped and strangled to death, then her body dumped off at Webster. Citizens were horrified when they discovered
the similarities. Unfortunately, Wanda was not the last

Wrongful Murder Cases
Yes. While an individual being prosecuted for the death of a Plaintiff's loved one is helpful in a wrongful death and/or survival case, it is not a
requirement.
Norridgewock Man Dies After Being Struck by Vehicle, Widow Files a Wrongful Death and Survival Lawsuit
On Dec. 31, 2013, a 70–year–old Norridgewock man died from the wounds he sustained when he was struck by a motor vehicle as he crossed Mercer
Road. Even though the district attorney is not prosecuting the driver, a wrongful death and survival suit is being filed by the man's widow.
At approximately 5 p.m., 70–year–old Stanley Worthley was struck by a 2003 Toyota Highlander being driven by 65–year–old William Young of
Fayette. Worthley's widow, Marylee Worthley, has filed a wrongful

James Driskell's Murder Case
Who is he? James Driskell is a Canadian man born in 1959. In 1991, he was wrongfully convicted for the murder of his friend, Perry Harder. Prior
to the murder, the two of them ran a "chop shop" together, where they would disassemble stolen vehicles and sell the parts and materials off for
money. The chop shop was discovered by authorities in 1989, and the two were promptly arrested on several charges. The prosecution offered a plea
deal to Perry. If he admitted guilt to some of his charges, he would receive a lightened sentence, and James would not be prosecuted afterwards. When
the day of the trial came, Perry was not present, and authorities could not locate him. Three months later, Perry's body was discovered, the cause of
death being two gunshots to the chest. How was he convicted?... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The motivation being that if Perry was killed, he would not be able to testify against James in court. During James' trial, the prosecution provided
two key pieces of evidence. Two witnesses testified against James, claiming that James had told them at one point about his plan to kill Perry.
Despite the two witnesses being convicted criminals, any suspicion to their honesty was cleared when they made it clear they were not gaining any
benefits to themselves by testifying. Secondly, forensics discovered three hairs in James' van. The hairs were determined to have come from Perry,
indicating that there was a struggle between the two. The evidence against James was compelling, and he was sentenced to life in prison, with no
chance of parole for 25

Unsolved Murder Case Summary
The case selected for this paper is that of the unsolved murders of a family of eight in Pike County, Ohio on April 22, 2016. Eight members of the
Rhoden family were found shot in the head, execution style, at four separate crime scenes, also found at the crime scenes were three small children; a
four–day old newborn baby, a six–month–old and a three–year–old, all three children were unharmed (Valencia, 2017). Per news reports, seven of the
eight victims were in three homes while the eighth victim was found in a fourth home with the unharmed newborn baby (Valencia, 2017). The murders
occurred during the night with all eight victims being murdered in their beds as they slept. The victims ranged in age from 16–years–old to
44–years–old and were... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Deductive reasoning draws from specific conclusions of general principles (Bartol & Bartol, 2010). Arrival at the crime scene and drawing
theories from the scene would be the initial step of deductive analysis. Forming a hypothesis from theories drawn at the scenes would follow. The
hypothesis here is; there are many aspects of this crime and unknown suspects that are obvious such as the sophistication of the attacks and the fact
that the young children were spared, this alone aligns with criminals who are experienced and have a clear method of what they do. Observation of
the multiple crime scenes and the way in which the family was killed leads to, this act of violence against this family showing as being business
related and not personal. This is based on the fact that the victims were shot execution style while sleeping in their beds (Valencia, 2017). It is
possible the marijuana grow operations are connected in some way to the killings. Due to there being more than one crime scene within close
proximity to each other, there may be multiple assailants in this crime. The hypothesis drawn in this case can only be confirmed after an arrest of a
suspect is made, this case remains

The Case And Remedies Of An Arkansas Capital Murder Case
In an Arkansas capital murder prosecution that had resulted in conviction and sentences of death based on the killing of four members of a family
defense counsel learned after the conviction had been reversed that a key prosecution witness, the defendant's son, who testified against his father
implicating him in the murders at trial, has also given prosecutors a statement in which he claimed responsibility for the crimes and exculpated his
father. Defense counsel moved to dismiss the prosecution on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct, but the Arkansas Supreme Court rejected the
prior jeopardy claim and permitting the retrial to proceed, while referring the prosecutors involved to the court's Committee on Professional Conduct for
consideration of possible ethical violations. On retrial, the defendant was again convicted, although his son did not testify against him at this
proceeding. Issues of prosecutorial misconduct in this case and remedies for misconduct are examined in this article.
INTRODUCTION: THE BILLY DALE GREEN CAPITALMURDER CASE
When Billy Dale Green was first tried and convicted of the capital murders of four members of an Arkansas family and sentenced to death in an
Arkansas circuit court in 2004, the prosecution's key witness was his son, Chad. Having pleaded guilty in return for a 20 year sentence, Chad testified
that his father had smoked methamphetamine together before his father killed the couple and their two children, apparently as a result

Kitty Genovese's Murder Case
Two weeks after Kitty Genovese's murder case. The reporter of the New York Times, Martin Gansberg, assigned a story with a shocking headline:
"Thirty–Seven Who Saw Murder Didn't Call Police." A story began with the strong description: "For more than half an hour 38 respectable,
law–abiding citizens watched a killer stalk and stab a woman in three separate attacks in Kew Gardens (Martin Gansberg)." This case had became
concerned about people's lack of concern.
Why the witnesses demonstrated a lack of reaction towards the victim's need for help? In 1968, two Social psychologists Bibb LatanГ© and John
Darley came up with a concept called "The Bystander Effect", which supposed "the presence of diffusion of responsibility" and "social influence".

The O. J. Simpson Murder Case
In the post–modern world as well as multicultural facets of criminology and justice, various correlations are involved in the process. Through
post–Marxism, postfeminism, post–affirmative and post–structuralism dimensions, multiple variables like gender, race, class and even age are
important in understanding the handling of cases in the system (Bellis, 2007). The explanations based on crime and control of the same make sense and
differences in the correlations, despite the perspectives on the school of thoughts. The famous O. J. Simpson murder case is one of the many examples
that can be used to drive the literature sense into perspective. The case was a trial held with the suspect being responsible for his ex–wife's death, as
well as her

Lunchroom Murder Case
Bang! The shot rang against the walls. The police ran into Ernie's Lunchroom and found Fannin dead. With only four suspects and only a little evidence
I have come to the conclusion that customer C killed Fannin. All evidence points to customer C. This customer was left –handed because of his table
set. Customer C has different habits than the others and that makes him stand out from the others. At the seat customer C was sitting at, they had
everything set up precisely the way a sinistral person would. They had their mug and cutlery on the left side and their napkin on the right side of the
plate. All the other table sets had their cutlery and mug on the right side and not the left. Another solid piece of evidence points to the hand–print on the
wall. The killer would have to have been left handed to have shot the gun and put his right hand against the wall. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Our killer would have had known Fannin because evidence suggests that Fannin and customer C knew each other because C would have to have been
close enough to shoot Fannin. The killer had left money in the cash register alone so this wasn't a robbery, but could have been a murder of passion. In
conclusion, all evidence points to customer C. The table set and footprints all suggest that Customer C murdered Fannin. Customer C is the guiltiest.
The other customer's footprints don't match the ones exiting through the back. With only one table set that is set up for someone with a left hand it
must be Customer

Indirect Murder Cases
While many thousands of murder cases go unsolved every year, it is a probable assumption that the general public would most likely only be able to
name all they knew on one hand. In no particular order, the top three reoccurring would most likely be: the 1994 murder of Nicole Brown Simpson
and Ron Goldman (estranged ex–husband Orenthal James Simpson), the 2008 murder of Caylee Anthony (mother Casey Anthony), and the 1996
murder of JonBenet Ramsey (Patsy, John, and Burke Ramsey). As all of these are high–profile cold–cases, all of them have thoroughly investigated not
only by local investigators but also through the public eye, yet no charges have been filed against any party. Two of the three cases show blatant
similarities one is that two of the three happened within the first six years of life (Caylee Anthony and JonBenet Ramsey), and in these cases the
mothers were investigated more than any other possible suspect. One man has reviewed these previous cases in addition to multiple others, Stephen
Diamond, who is a clinical and forensic psychologist in Los Angeles is further reviewing the JonBenet murder from the stance of a psychologist, just
after the case has been cold for twenty years. Diamond is not writing this article to solve the crime, or even attempt to, but to offer a forensic
psychologist's viewpoint. The main ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Investigatively there is not much that can be done to solve this crime twenty years later, but what can be done is the analyzation of the family
involved. Multiple aspects of JonBenet's murder are considered abnormal, so it would be easy to write an entire report on just the strange things that
occurred. Like a true professional, Diamond does not show any evidence of bias, and only is basing his analysis on the facts of the investigation, not on
the assumptions from the

Sarah Koenig's Murder Case
Imagine being in prison for 15 years, convicted for a murder that had extremely little physical and forensic evidence against you. This was one of the
numerous holes and facts that Sarah Koenig discusses in Serial that doesn't match up in the murder case of Hae Min Lee. On January 13th, 1999, a
seventeen year old student in Baltimore, Hae, disappears after school one afternoon. Her body was found in Leakin Park on February 9th, 1999, and
was manually strangled. Adnan Syed, her ex–boyfriend, was arrested and eventually convicted of murdering her. The unusual aspect about this murder
case is that there are many holes in the story that doesn't make sense. There is not much physical and real evidence against Adnan, although more of,
stories that former classmates and friends discuss... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This call occurred about an hour after Hae was murdered and lasted for two minutes. When asked about this mysterious call, Adnan said that Jay
had his phone and car at that time, but thinks that Jay called or butt dialed her and left a voicemail. Yet, Jay never knew Nisha and Adnan did. Since
Nisha didn't have an answering machine, somebody had to have been talking to her in those 2 minutes. When Nisha was asked about this in trial, she
remembered getting the call in the evening. Although according to the cell records, the call came in around 3:30. This was the moment where
everybody was speculating and convinced that Adnan did it. However, Koenig and Dana Chivvis found a loophole in this whole mystery. The
loophole states if you call someone and it keeps ringing, but don't hang up within a "reasonable time," AT&T will still charge even if the call is
unanswered. This loophole actually still exists today and the supposed "unreasonable time" is thirty seconds or longer. So this call could have been, in
fact, a butt

Gayle Meggyesy Murder Case
MILLERSBURG – While the murder of Gayle Meggyesy may have rocked the community, it left a huge void in the lives and pain in the hearts of her
family.
Meggyesy died on March 29, 1986, after being shot in the back and the head in the kitchen of her rural Killbuck Township home. Five days later, John
Friedrich, a family friend and former employee of her husband, Dennis, was arrested. And, in March 1988 he was convicted of her murder.
Friedrich was sentenced to 18 years to life, and his case will be considered at a full hearing of the Ohio Parole Board on Jan. 26. Her family stands
among the many who oppose his release.
Gayle Meggyesy was a wife. She was mother to three children, Nikki, Danielle and Lee. She was a Girl Scout leader and had helped ... Show more
The risk of being killed in some random act of violence isn't even in the same universe as having your own, personal Bogyman who hates you and
wants to hurt you and everyone you love. I freely admit that I'm not the least bit rational – it's a gut–level fear we have been living with for 30 years.
"The last nightmare I remember vividly was back in grad school," she said. "I woke up sobbing hysterically because I dreamed he walked up to me on
the street. That's all, and it was enough for me to absolutely lose my s***.
Preparing for and enduring every parole hearing is "emotionally exhausting," she said
"None of us have moved on from being that kid with a gun under the pillow waiting for him to come back from us. That's hard to live with," she
said. "We're afraid he's just smart enough to hid in woods somewhere with high powered rifle and start shooting us. I will spend every day for the
rest of my life waiting for a bullet to arrive just because I happened to be the daughter of his victim. It makes me so angry he has this affect on us. I
did nothing wrong. He chose to do

Paul Lance Murder Case
The case is jerry murdered by paul lance may 22nd 2003. This case will be about paul how he didn't know what he was doing as he saw the "Vulture
eye". I will show you in this case how paul was insane as he killed him that night of may 22nd 2003.
He did not know what he was doing as you can see when he say's, "He loved the old man...", but it was," ...it was his eye had a eye of a vulture." As
you can see he said it for himself that he loved the old man also saying in this quote, "He had never wronged me. Never given me a insult. For his
gold I had no desire." So he's saying that he would not hurt the old man but kill the eye. But he didn't just kill jerry he waited and went into his room at
12 at midnight every night for a week.
Next the reason he is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then he said when he killed jerry, he ripped off his limbs or his legs and arms also the head while killing jerry. "I cut off the head and the arms and
the legs." When he killed jerry you prob think he would disagree of what he did but he didn't he knew what he did because of the "Vulture eye". Also
when he killed jerry he said,"I then took up three planks from the flooring of the chamber, and deposited all between the scantlings. I then replaced the
boards so cleverly, so cunningly, that no human eye–not even his–could have detected anything wrong. There was nothing to wash out–no stain of any
kind–no blood–spot whatever."
So now you know that the reason he was killed jerry. First because he didn't know what he was doing like him laughing or killing him by cutting
every limb off. The other reason is because he wouldn't just kill the guy because he didn't like him it was because of the "vulture eye" and there
wasn't a "vulture eye" was just a eye but he didn't think so. So he had to kill him for that reason also the last reason was because he would stare at
the eye all night at 12 midnight every day for a week then he killed

The Murder Of Nicole Simpson Case
"If it doesn't fit, you must acquit" a statement which was used by Johnnie Cochran. A quote from the People of the State of California v. Orenthal
James Simpson was one of America's most famous cases that brought attention to the black community. This Era played a logo in the impact, and
after effects of this case. A case that brought attention to many American's, immigrants, nationwide viewers and also, a case that is known to today's
society as the OJ Simpson case. This case raised concern and debate over the black community. Orenthal James Simpson was a wealthy black man
that was a retired college and professional football hero, actor and he was also a commentator for Monday night live football. He was accused for the
murder of Nicole... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The public lost trust in the police. The public lost their respect for the department because they felt that justice was not served. What cause many
citizens to question this was the fact that the same police department who were involved in the Rodney King's case were also involved in the Oj
Simpson case. Oj Simpson's defense team was known as the "Dream team". They were made up of multiple lawyers, friends and close
acquaintances. They defended him and won the case against the people of the state of California. Johnnie Cochran one of the "Dream team"
members played a major role in the outcome of this case. In an interview done on Barbara Walter's television show the lead member, Robert
Sharprio asserted that he hired Mr. Cochran because he was black. In the interview with Barbara Walters, when she asked if he hired Jhonnie
Cochran bacuse he was black, he said yes. Miss Walter's also asked if the race card played a part and he admitted it did. He said that they did not
play the race card but they dealt it. On the other side, was the lead prosecutor by the name of Marcia Clark. She was ridiculed, especially by men
during this case. Her experience during this case led her towards writing a book. She had to much confidence in herself. She knew that the evidence
would prove her case however, it did not. She underestimated Oj Simpson celebrity status and how he used his race to manipulate the jury. During the
trail citizens felt that she was incompetent and her

George Zimmerman's Murder Case Analysis
These are two different cases of murder. One is supposedly out of self–defense, and the other could have been murder with intent, or accidental. It is
unknown. Facts about the cases show that George Zimmerman's murder trial could have been pressured by the public, assumedly because he killed a
black man, Trayvon Martin. Witnesses' accounts and evidence from 911 calls support Zimmerman's claim that he shot Trayvon out of self–defense.
Autopsy reports also indicated that Trayvon was shot at a very close range. Witness accounts report that Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, beating
him up. It was later reported that he had a broken nose and cuts on the back of his head (CNN Library (b), 2016). These are evidence that aligns with
Zimmerman's story of self–defense.
The only mistake that Zimmerman committed was not following Trayvon as instructed by the police. Zimmerman had called 911 to report a
suspicious person in the neighborhood. He was then instructed not to follow the person, but he did so anyway (CNN Library (b), 2016). For one to be
charged with murder according to the State of Florida's laws, he or she must have unlawfully killed a person constituting first–degree, second–degree or
third–degree murders (The Florida Legislature, 2016). The facts show that Zimmerman had no intention of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For Zimmerman's case, the Jurors had an adequate understanding of the law and made the right decision to acquit him of murder. The media already
branded him a murderer even before trial, but the Jurors managed to play their role as expected. Richard (2014) indicates that the media controls great
influence in the society. In most cases, they help determine what topics to talk about and the direction of the topic. That is why in the crimes with
widespread media coverage, the jurors, prosecutors and defendants face difficult challenges. The Jurors may develop some bias towards the victims
and judge the defendants guilty in a case

Joe And Murder Case Brief
Joe
Murder
The most serious offence Joe could be charged with is murder. Murder is the "unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen's Peace with malice
afterthought to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm". Murder is committed by an act or omission. In this case its an omission. An omission occurs
when the defendant had a duty to act and breached that duty. This breach must be the cause of death. The actus reus for murder is the unlawful killing of
another person in the Queen's peace and It must be satisfied that the defendant's act or omission caused the death of the victim. Karla is not a foetus,
she was not killed in a cause of self– defence nor during a time of war. In Miller, the court held that "conduct which consists of failing... Show more
If the Jury agrees, she would be convicted of manslaughter. To rely on a defense of loss of control, the defense must show that the defendant's actions
and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing resulted from actual loss of self–control the loss of self control had a qualifying trigger and that a
person of the defendant's age and sex with a normal degree of tolerance and self– restraint given defendant's circumstances might have reacted the same
way as the defendant. The first issue is of actual loss of control by the defendant. Unlike the previous law of provocation, loss of control need not be
sudden. This may beget a problem because the longer the delay between the qualifying trigger and the act of killing, the more difficult it will be to
establish actual loss of self–control. If the defendant acted for a a desire for revenge, the defence will not be available. Loss of control can not be
relied upon in cases of sexual infidelity. Although Lou gets up from the floor where she had been pushed by Mick after a short period, she goes
into the kitchen and grabs a knife stabbing Mick continuously. Lou went to Mick's house to confront him about the death of her sister. It is clear that
she did not kill Mick in a desire for revenge and that she lost control. Secondly, it is the issue of if "D's loss of self–control was attributable to D's fear
of serious violence from V against D or another person or in combination to things done and/or said to the victim which constituted circumstances
of an extremely grave character, and caused D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged. "In determining whether a loss of control had
a qualifying trigger, "D's fear of serious violence is to be disregarded to the extent that it was caused by a thing which D incited to be done or said for
the purpose of providing an excuse to use violence" In essence, what this means is the qualifying

Malice Murder Case
The role of malice in determining the level of criminal homicide will have to do with if there was or was not malice aforethought involved with the
criminal homicide. Because malice distinguished murder and manslaughter, it was imperative for the courts to define that term. Framers of the Model
Penal Code considered malice to be so ill defined, that they abandoned the concept altogether in distinguishing between murder and manslaughter
(Brody and Acker, 2010).
So let us say there are rival gangs and one gang decides to retaliate against the other gang. It is decided the one gang will go to the hangout of the other
gang and shoot members of that gang. However, in the chaos, a young girl that is an innocent bystander accidentally gets shot and

Murder Case Summary
On October 28, 2015, in the capital court of the Harris County Criminal Courts at Law, Judge Mark Kent Ellis, who was working on a murder case
that happened in late 2013. My first experience when I had entered the court building was through the security area where I had to take all my
belongings and place it in a bin before going through the metal detector. After that, I went to the 20th floor where there were some cases that were
scheduled to begin. I entered one of the courtrooms and sat down with other students and waited for the attorneys and their clients to enter the
courtroom along with Judge Ellis. Around 9:30 AM, Hon. Judge Mark Kent Ellis entered and the case began to take place. Unlike the broadcast that I
had seen online, there was no introduction about the case, rather the attorney for the plaintiff started to ask the witness or the plaintiff about the case.
The murder case number was not mentioned, but it was between Johnathan Sanchez, the defendant, versus the Plaintiff who was the witness of the case
that his name was not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both trials were posted through the Court Chatter View account on YouTube; the whole trial was recorded and broadcasted. Although both of the cases
were not part of a court–reality show series, it does relate to the capital murder case I went to. In both court cases an introduction was started by the
attorney on the plaintiff's side stating what the case is about or what happened, what the defendant was being accused of before or during the time of
the incident, etc. Throughout the course of the cases, many questions were asked for witnesses to answer; based on the certain evidences that were
found during a particular time,

Hugjilt Murder Case Essay
In China an eighteen–year–old boy, Huugjilt, was wrongfully convicted of raping and strangling a woman to death in a restroom at the textile factory
where he worked in Hohhot on April 9, 1996. Police said that Huugjilt "confessed" to this crime in less than forty–eight hours. On May 23, only
forty–three days after the death occurred, Huugjilt was convicted of the murder of the woman and sentenced to death. Then on June 8, only eighteen
days after Huugjilt's conviction and death sentence, he was executed by firing squad. After Huugjilt's execution, there were reports that circulated that
officers working the murder case were rewarded for a quick arrest. The whole process – from the crime to the wrongful execution of an
eighteen–year–old

The Murder Case Of Charles Wilson
In order to understand and come up with an opinion of the murder case of Charles Wilson and whether or not there was justice served. One must first
understand the case, and once they're completely informed can they make a decision if justice was served. Charles Wilson is a U.S. Deputy Marshal.
He was murdered on Election Day. There were a few men that were suspects in the murder. They were Robert Benton, who was known as U.S. Deputy
Marshal Charles Wilson's rival in the election. Another was a friend of Robert Benton. However, they were both acquitted for the murder of U.S
Deputy Marshal Charles Wilson. Now there has to be someone who is charged with the murder of a high ranking individual, it has to be soon that the
law enforcement can close

Villisca Murder Case Study
In a small midwestern town in Villisca, Iowa rests the quiet house of Josiah B. Moore and Sarah Montgomery Moore, who were both killed with an
ax around midnight along with their 4 children Katherine, Herman, Boyd, and Paul. All in the age range between 5 and 11. In addition to those
murders, as if it weren't bad enough, two friends of theirs were sleeping over. The Stillinger sisters, Lena and Ina both just 12 an 8 years old, were
killed as well. The VilliscaMurder Case as called by law enforcement was the longest unsolved case of our time. It's still unsolved, and has been left
open for more than 100 years. It was a terrible tragedy because the small town of Villisca lost eight innocent lives that night. The murderer unknown,
evidence they hardly have any, and eight people's skulls ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Suspects say that Mansfield was a serial killer who was held responsible for the murder of his wife, infant child, and in laws. Police also believe that
William committed a similar axe murder in Paola, Kansas just 4 days before the Villisca murders. In addition, according to detective Wilkerson, he
assumes that Mansfield was hired by Frank F. Jones to execute the Moorefamily. The quote from the Villisca Ax Murder web page emphasizes,
"According to Wilkerson's investigation, all of the murders were committed in precisely the same manner indicating the same man committed them".
This indicates that whoever committed this crime had to be linked to all the previous crimes, and Police assume the Mansfield was the suspect that
killed all these people. The detective convicted the Grand jury to open an investigation on William Mansfield in 1916 (four years after the murder)
threw alibi. But, this eventually led to Mansfield's release. Knowing that William Mansfield couldn't have murdered the family, investigators then look
at Frank F.

Jeffrey Macdonald Murder Case

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Trina Jackson

More from Trina Jackson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Jeffrey Macdonald Murder Case