SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Isostasy in Geology and
Basin Analysis
This exercise is drawn from Angevine, Heller and Paola
(1990), with inspiration and essential planning by R. Dorsey.
A. Martin-Barajas generously provided material used in this
exercise.
Archimedes Principle: When a body is immersed in a
fluid, the fluid exerts an upward force on the body
that is equal to the weight of the fluid that is
displaced by the body.”
This rule applies to all mountain belts and basins
under conditions of local (Airy) isostatic
compensation: the lithosphere has no lateral
strength, and thus each lithospheric column is
independent of neighboring columns (e.g. rift
basins).
To work isostasy problems, we assume that the
lithosphere (crust + upper mantle) is “floating” in
the fluid asthenosphere. A simple, nongeologic
example looks like this -
Solid
rs
1 2
h2
h1
Fluid (rf)
depth of equal
compensation
Because fluid has no shear strength (yield stress =0),
it cannot maintain lateral pressure differences. It
will flow to eliminate the pressure gradient.
Solid
rs
1 2
h2
h1
Fluid (rf)
depth of equal
compensation
Solid
rs
1 2
h2
h1
Fluid (rf)
depth of equal
compensation
To calculate equilibrium forces, set forces of two
columns equal to each other: F1 = F2 (f=ma)
m1xa = m2xa
m1 = m2
(gravitational acceleration
cancels out)
Because m=rxv (density x volume),
convert to m=rh, and: rfh1=rsh2
Solid
rs
1 2
h2
h1
Fluid (rf)
depth of equal
compensation
This equation
correctly
describes
equilibrium
isostatic
balance in the
diagram.
Onward to geology –
Courtesy Sue Cashman
EXAMPLE 1 Estimate thickness of lithosphere:
In this example, we’ve
measured the depth to the
moho (hc) using seismic
refraction.
Elevation (e) is known, and
standard densities for the
crust, mantle, and
asthenosphere are used:
rc=2800 kg/m3
rm=3400 kg/m3
ra=3300 kg/m3
rc
elevation=3km
rm
hc=35km
hm=?
asthenosphere (rc)
Z=?
How deep to the base of the lithosphere?
Solve for Z:
ra(Z) = rc(hc+e) + rm(Z-hc)
ra(Z) - rmZ = rc(hc+e) - rmhc
rc(hc+e) - rmhc
(ra-rm)
rc
elevation=3km
rm
hc=35km
hm=?
asthenosphere (ra)
Z=?
Z=
How deep to the base of the lithosphere?
Solve for Z:
ra(Z) = rc(hc+e) + rm(Z-hc)
ra(Z) - rmZ = rm(Z-hc) - rmhc
rc(hc+e) - rmhc
(ra-rm)
2800(35+3) – 3400(35)
(3300-3400)
-12,600
-100
rc
elevation=3km
rm
hc=35km
hm=?
asthenosphere (rc)
Z=?
Z=
=
= Z = 126 km
EXAMPLE 2 What is the effect of filling a basin with
sediment?
Courtesy Scott Bennett
Consider a basin 1km deep that is filled only
with water. How much sediment would it take
to fill the basin up to sea level?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
Let rw= 1000
kg/m3
Let rs= 2200 kg/m3
ho=
1km
hc
hm
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
1 2
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
ho=
1km
hc
hm
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
Remember, force balance must be calculated for entire
column down to depth of compensation (=depth below which
there is no density difference between columns). Also,
thickness of crust and mantle lithosphere does not change, so
they cancel out on both sides of the equation.
1 2
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
ho=
1km
hc
hm
(hs-ho)
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
rwho + rchc + rmhm + ra(hs-ho) = rshs + rchc + rmhm
rwho + ra(hs-ho) = rshs
rwho + rahs – raho = rshs
hs(ra- rs) = raho – rwho
hs = ho(ra- rw)
(ra- rs)
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
ho=
1km
hc
hm
(hs-ho)
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
hs =
ho(ra- rw)
(ra- rs)
=
1.0 (3.3-1.0)
(3.3-2.2)
= 2.1 km
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
ho=
1km
hc
hm
(hs-ho)
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
How much sediment would it take to fill a water-
filled basin up to sea level?
“rule of thumb”: the thickness of sediment needed to fill
a basin is ~ 2.1 times the depth of water that the
sediment replaces
EXAMPLE 2B Sediment filling – Alarcon Basin
example
Determine the maximum water depth in the Alarcon
Basin from your profile or spreadsheet.
Calculate how much sediment would be needed to fill
the Alarcon Basin up to sea level.
(Kluesner, 2011)
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
ra= 3300
water
crust
mantle
lithosphere
rs=
2200
sediment
crust
mantle
lithosphere
depth of equal
compensation
ho=
1km
hc
hm
(hs-ho)
hs=?
rC=
2800
rm=
3400
hs =
ho(ra- rw)
(ra- rs)
=
3 (3.3-1.0)
(3.3-2.2)
= 6.3 km
Calculate how much sediment would be needed to
fill the Alarcon Basin up to sea level:
Maximum water depth in the Alarcon Basin = 3km.
Our calculation shows that ~6.3 km of sediment would
be needed to fill the basin up to sea level.
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
EXAMPLE 3 How does crustal thinning affect
the depth of sedimentary basins?
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Newly-formed basin
Thin crust and
mantle lithosphere
to half of original.
How deep a basin
forms in response to
thinning?
Solve for Z.
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z
rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha)
30rc + 90rm = rw(Z) + 15rc + 45rm + ra(120-15-45-Z)
30rc + 90rm = Zrw + 15rc + 45rm + 60ra- Zra
Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Z
Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
If the new basin is filled by water,
what is its depth (Z)? -
A: Fill with water
(rw = 1.01 g/cm2)
Z=
60ra-45rm-15rc
(ra – rw)
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Z
Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
If the new basin is filled by water -
A: Fill with water
(rw = 1.01 g/cm2)
Z=
60ra-45rm-15rc
(ra – rw)
60(3.3)- 45(3.4)-15(2.8)
(3.3-1.01)
=
=
3.00
2.29
= 1.31 km
for water
If crust and mantle lithosphere are thinned to half
of original thickness, how deep a basin would
form in response to thinning?
Our calculation shows that the newly-formed basin
would be ~1.3 km deep if it was filled by water.
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Z
Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
If the new basin is filled by
sediment, how deep will it be? -
B: Fill with sediment
(rs = 2.2 g/cm2)
Z=
60ra-45rm-15rc
(ra – rs)
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
30km hc2
hm1=
90km
hm2
ha
Z
Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
Basin is formed:
A: fill with water
B: fill with sediment
B: Fill with sediment
(rs = 2.2 g/cm2)
Z=
60ra-45rm-15rc
(ra – rs)
60(3.3)- 45(3.4)-15(2.8)
(3.3-2.3)
=
=
3.00
1.0
= 2.7 km
for sediment
If crust and mantle lithosphere are thinned to half
of original thickness, how deep a basin would
form in response to thinning?
Our calculation shows that the newly-formed basin
would be ~2.7 km deep if it was filled by sediment.
(Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
EXAMPLE 3B What rifting parameters can
produce the crustal structure observed in the
Upper Delfin basin?
Experiment with different sediment densities and
different crust and mantle lithosphere initial
thicknesses to find values that could produce the
thicknesses shown on this cross-section.
This cross-section spans the Delfin and Tiburon
basins. The core of the Baja California peninsula (NW
end of cross-section) is un-rifted crust, and its
thickness (35-40 km) is a reasonable approximation of
pre-rift crustal thickness.
(Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
Delfin Basin
Location map, Northern Gulf
of California
(Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
From the cross-section, measure and record:
hc1, initial crustal thickness (use crustal thickness
at the NW end of the cross-section as an estimate)
hc2, crustal thickness under Delfin basin after
extension (0!)
hs, thickness of sediments (and intrusions at base
of sediments) in Delfin basin
(Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
__km
hc2=0
hm1=
90km
hm2=0
ha
Delfin basin
Solve for Z. Then
see how well your
answer matches
sediment thick-
ness Z on the
cross-section
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z(=hs)
Experiment #1
Use 90 km for a starting thickness of mantle
lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from
the cross-section.
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
__km
hc2=0
hm1=
50km
hm2=0
ha
Delfin basin
Solve for Z. Then
see how well your
answer matches
sediment thick-
ness Z on the
cross-section
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z(=hs)
Experiment #2
Use 50 km for a starting thickness of mantle
lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from
the cross-section.
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
__km
hc2=0
hm1=
20km
hm2=0
ha
Delfin basin
Solve for Z. Then
see how well your
answer matches
sediment thick-
ness Z on the
cross-section
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z(=hs)
Experiment #3
Use 20 km for a starting thickness of mantle
lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from
the cross-section.
crust
mantle
litho-
sphere
1 2
hc1=
__km
hc2=0
hm1=
20km
hm2=0
ha
Delfin basin
Solve for Z. Then
see how well your
answer matches
sediment thick-
ness Z on the
cross-section
Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Z(=hs)
Experiment #4
Use same thickness values you used in experiment
#1, but change rs to 2400. rs varies with total
sediment thickness….
Experiment #1
rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha)
and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Solve for Z.
Plug in
thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=90km, hc2=0, hm2=0
and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3,
ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3
Solution: Z = 7.7 km (too small, does not match cross-
section)
Experiment #2
rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha)
and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Solve for Z.
Plug in
thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=50km, hc2=0, hm2=0
and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3,
ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3
Solution: Z = 11.4 km (about right, matches cross-section)
Experiment #3
rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha)
and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Solve for Z.
Plug in
thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=20km, hc2=0, hm2=0
and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3,
ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3
Solution: Z = 14.1 km (too large, does not match cross-
section)
Experiment #4
rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha)
and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z
Solve for Z.
Plug in
thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=90km, hc2=0, hm2=0
and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3,
ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2400 kg/m3
Solution: Z = 9.4 km (about right)
Delfin Basin
Location map, Northern Gulf
of California
Note: These solutions assume
sufficient sediment supply to
keep the basin filled. That’s a
good assumption here
because of the very high
sediment input from the
Colorado River.
(Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
Our assumption that there
is sufficient sediment
supply to keep the basin
filled would not be a good
assumption further south in
the Gulf of California where
basins are sediment
starved.
Delfin Basin
Google Earth

More Related Content

What's hot

ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
Gravity, Expl.ravity
 Gravity, Expl.ravity Gravity, Expl.ravity
Gravity, Expl.ravityahmadraza05
 
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flow
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flowNon equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flow
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flowAbhishek Gupta
 
Rock Physics: Seismic Velocity
Rock Physics: Seismic VelocityRock Physics: Seismic Velocity
Rock Physics: Seismic Velocity
Ali Osman Öncel
 
radial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping testradial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping test
Fatonah Munsai
 
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
Arthur Weglein
 
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Abhay Kumar
 
Correction for construction Settlement
Correction for construction SettlementCorrection for construction Settlement
Correction for construction Settlement
Sanchari Halder
 
Introduction to Rock Physics
Introduction to Rock PhysicsIntroduction to Rock Physics
Introduction to Rock Physics
dinomasch
 
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Abhay Kumar
 
Phase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysisPhase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysis
Malika khalil
 
Basic stability 1
Basic stability 1Basic stability 1
Basic stability 1Acex Aribal
 
Atmospheric Chemistry Models
Atmospheric Chemistry ModelsAtmospheric Chemistry Models
Atmospheric Chemistry Models
ahmad bassiouny
 
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wellsChapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
Bakr Younis /Al-Azhar University – Gaza
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
Anastasia Dollari
 

What's hot (20)

ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
Gravity, Expl.ravity
 Gravity, Expl.ravity Gravity, Expl.ravity
Gravity, Expl.ravity
 
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flow
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flowNon equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flow
Non equilibrium equation for unsteady radial flow
 
Rock Physics: Seismic Velocity
Rock Physics: Seismic VelocityRock Physics: Seismic Velocity
Rock Physics: Seismic Velocity
 
radial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping testradial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping test
 
Intra ~3
Intra ~3Intra ~3
Intra ~3
 
Br ro2012a
Br ro2012aBr ro2012a
Br ro2012a
 
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
Wavelet estimation for a multidimensional acoustic or elastic earth- Arthur W...
 
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Phase of soil (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
 
Correction for construction Settlement
Correction for construction SettlementCorrection for construction Settlement
Correction for construction Settlement
 
Introduction to Rock Physics
Introduction to Rock PhysicsIntroduction to Rock Physics
Introduction to Rock Physics
 
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
Consolidation sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
 
Phase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysisPhase relations soil analysis
Phase relations soil analysis
 
[7] trim
[7] trim[7] trim
[7] trim
 
Basic stability 1
Basic stability 1Basic stability 1
Basic stability 1
 
Atmospheric Chemistry Models
Atmospheric Chemistry ModelsAtmospheric Chemistry Models
Atmospheric Chemistry Models
 
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wellsChapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
Chapter 5 Fetter Ground water flow to wells
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
A Black-Oil Model for Primary and Secondary Oil-Recovery in Stratified Petrol...
 

Similar to Isostasy & basin analysis powerpoint

Learning object 1
Learning object 1Learning object 1
Learning object 1
Alex Cynader
 
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowlStudy of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
Sandra B
 
slidesWaveRegular.pdf
slidesWaveRegular.pdfslidesWaveRegular.pdf
slidesWaveRegular.pdf
cfisicaster
 
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdfWavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
cfisicaster
 
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdfThermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
Mahamad Jawhar
 
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdfvdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
izzy428028
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11Chapter 11
Chapter 11
Younes Sina
 
Design of Lined Channels.pptx
Design of Lined Channels.pptxDesign of Lined Channels.pptx
Design of Lined Channels.pptx
Tahseensanai
 
I027055062
I027055062I027055062
I027055062
inventionjournals
 
Ch16 ssm
Ch16 ssmCh16 ssm
Ch16 ssm
Marta Díaz
 
Groundwater movement
Groundwater movementGroundwater movement
Groundwater movement
Shambel Yideg
 
Lecture 04 bernouilli's principle
Lecture 04   bernouilli's principleLecture 04   bernouilli's principle
Lecture 04 bernouilli's principle
Albania Energy Association
 
Lecture 07 sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
Lecture 07   sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.Lecture 07   sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
Lecture 07 sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
Albania Energy Association
 
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
marmar83
 
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment HelpDynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
Solidwork Assignment Help
 
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdfWavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
cfisicaster
 
Darcy´s law
Darcy´s lawDarcy´s law
Darcy´s lawoscar
 
Unit.ppt
Unit.pptUnit.ppt
Unit.ppt
BradAv1
 

Similar to Isostasy & basin analysis powerpoint (20)

Learning object 1
Learning object 1Learning object 1
Learning object 1
 
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowlStudy of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
Study of Parametric Standing Waves in Fluid filled Tibetan Singing bowl
 
slidesWaveRegular.pdf
slidesWaveRegular.pdfslidesWaveRegular.pdf
slidesWaveRegular.pdf
 
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdfWavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
 
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdfThermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. (Solution).pdf
 
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdfvdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
vdocuments.mx_thermodynamics-an-engineering-approach-5th-ed-solution.pdf
 
Fog visibility
Fog visibilityFog visibility
Fog visibility
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11Chapter 11
Chapter 11
 
10 fluid dynamics
10 fluid dynamics10 fluid dynamics
10 fluid dynamics
 
Design of Lined Channels.pptx
Design of Lined Channels.pptxDesign of Lined Channels.pptx
Design of Lined Channels.pptx
 
I027055062
I027055062I027055062
I027055062
 
Ch16 ssm
Ch16 ssmCh16 ssm
Ch16 ssm
 
Groundwater movement
Groundwater movementGroundwater movement
Groundwater movement
 
Lecture 04 bernouilli's principle
Lecture 04   bernouilli's principleLecture 04   bernouilli's principle
Lecture 04 bernouilli's principle
 
Lecture 07 sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
Lecture 07   sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.Lecture 07   sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
Lecture 07 sound waves. speed of sound. intensity.
 
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
SUBMERGED HORIZONTAL PLATE FOR COASTAL RETREATING CONTROL: THE CASE OF POLIGN...
 
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment HelpDynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
Dynamics and Acoustics Assignment Help
 
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdfWavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
WavesExamplesAnswers.pdf
 
Darcy´s law
Darcy´s lawDarcy´s law
Darcy´s law
 
Unit.ppt
Unit.pptUnit.ppt
Unit.ppt
 

More from SERC at Carleton College

StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxStatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxSERC at Carleton College
 
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationCretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationSERC at Carleton College
 
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
SERC at Carleton College
 
weather tracking ppt
weather tracking pptweather tracking ppt
weather tracking ppt
SERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cyclePresentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycleSERC at Carleton College
 
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxKSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxSERC at Carleton College
 
Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7
SERC at Carleton College
 
Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2
SERC at Carleton College
 
Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6
SERC at Carleton College
 
Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3
SERC at Carleton College
 
Unit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentationUnit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentation
SERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background informationPresentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
SERC at Carleton College
 
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background InformationPresentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
SERC at Carleton College
 

More from SERC at Carleton College (20)

StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptxStatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
 
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptxStatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
 
Unit 1 (optional slides)
Unit 1 (optional slides)Unit 1 (optional slides)
Unit 1 (optional slides)
 
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns PresentationCretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
 
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2Climate and Biomes PPT 2
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
 
weather tracking ppt
weather tracking pptweather tracking ppt
weather tracking ppt
 
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cyclePresentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
 
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptxStatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
 
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
KSKL chapter 8 PPTKSKL chapter 8 PPT
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
 
KSKL chap 5 PPT
KSKL chap 5 PPTKSKL chap 5 PPT
KSKL chap 5 PPT
 
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptxKSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
 
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
Degraded Soil Images.pptxDegraded Soil Images.pptx
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
 
Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 7
 
Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 2
 
Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT file chapter 6
 
Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3Educators PPT chapter 3
Educators PPT chapter 3
 
Unit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentationUnit 4 background presentation
Unit 4 background presentation
 
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background informationPresentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
 
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background InformationPresentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
 
Introduction to GPS presentation
Introduction to GPS presentationIntroduction to GPS presentation
Introduction to GPS presentation
 

Isostasy & basin analysis powerpoint

  • 1. Isostasy in Geology and Basin Analysis This exercise is drawn from Angevine, Heller and Paola (1990), with inspiration and essential planning by R. Dorsey. A. Martin-Barajas generously provided material used in this exercise.
  • 2. Archimedes Principle: When a body is immersed in a fluid, the fluid exerts an upward force on the body that is equal to the weight of the fluid that is displaced by the body.”
  • 3. This rule applies to all mountain belts and basins under conditions of local (Airy) isostatic compensation: the lithosphere has no lateral strength, and thus each lithospheric column is independent of neighboring columns (e.g. rift basins).
  • 4. To work isostasy problems, we assume that the lithosphere (crust + upper mantle) is “floating” in the fluid asthenosphere. A simple, nongeologic example looks like this - Solid rs 1 2 h2 h1 Fluid (rf) depth of equal compensation
  • 5. Because fluid has no shear strength (yield stress =0), it cannot maintain lateral pressure differences. It will flow to eliminate the pressure gradient. Solid rs 1 2 h2 h1 Fluid (rf) depth of equal compensation
  • 6. Solid rs 1 2 h2 h1 Fluid (rf) depth of equal compensation To calculate equilibrium forces, set forces of two columns equal to each other: F1 = F2 (f=ma) m1xa = m2xa m1 = m2 (gravitational acceleration cancels out)
  • 7. Because m=rxv (density x volume), convert to m=rh, and: rfh1=rsh2 Solid rs 1 2 h2 h1 Fluid (rf) depth of equal compensation This equation correctly describes equilibrium isostatic balance in the diagram.
  • 8. Onward to geology – Courtesy Sue Cashman
  • 9. EXAMPLE 1 Estimate thickness of lithosphere: In this example, we’ve measured the depth to the moho (hc) using seismic refraction. Elevation (e) is known, and standard densities for the crust, mantle, and asthenosphere are used: rc=2800 kg/m3 rm=3400 kg/m3 ra=3300 kg/m3 rc elevation=3km rm hc=35km hm=? asthenosphere (rc) Z=?
  • 10. How deep to the base of the lithosphere? Solve for Z: ra(Z) = rc(hc+e) + rm(Z-hc) ra(Z) - rmZ = rc(hc+e) - rmhc rc(hc+e) - rmhc (ra-rm) rc elevation=3km rm hc=35km hm=? asthenosphere (ra) Z=? Z=
  • 11. How deep to the base of the lithosphere? Solve for Z: ra(Z) = rc(hc+e) + rm(Z-hc) ra(Z) - rmZ = rm(Z-hc) - rmhc rc(hc+e) - rmhc (ra-rm) 2800(35+3) – 3400(35) (3300-3400) -12,600 -100 rc elevation=3km rm hc=35km hm=? asthenosphere (rc) Z=? Z= = = Z = 126 km
  • 12. EXAMPLE 2 What is the effect of filling a basin with sediment? Courtesy Scott Bennett
  • 13. Consider a basin 1km deep that is filled only with water. How much sediment would it take to fill the basin up to sea level? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation Let rw= 1000 kg/m3 Let rs= 2200 kg/m3 ho= 1km hc hm hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 1 2
  • 14. rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation ho= 1km hc hm hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 Remember, force balance must be calculated for entire column down to depth of compensation (=depth below which there is no density difference between columns). Also, thickness of crust and mantle lithosphere does not change, so they cancel out on both sides of the equation. 1 2
  • 15. rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation ho= 1km hc hm (hs-ho) hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 rwho + rchc + rmhm + ra(hs-ho) = rshs + rchc + rmhm rwho + ra(hs-ho) = rshs rwho + rahs – raho = rshs hs(ra- rs) = raho – rwho hs = ho(ra- rw) (ra- rs)
  • 16. rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation ho= 1km hc hm (hs-ho) hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 hs = ho(ra- rw) (ra- rs) = 1.0 (3.3-1.0) (3.3-2.2) = 2.1 km
  • 17. rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation ho= 1km hc hm (hs-ho) hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 How much sediment would it take to fill a water- filled basin up to sea level? “rule of thumb”: the thickness of sediment needed to fill a basin is ~ 2.1 times the depth of water that the sediment replaces
  • 18. EXAMPLE 2B Sediment filling – Alarcon Basin example Determine the maximum water depth in the Alarcon Basin from your profile or spreadsheet. Calculate how much sediment would be needed to fill the Alarcon Basin up to sea level. (Kluesner, 2011)
  • 19. rC= 2800 rm= 3400 ra= 3300 water crust mantle lithosphere rs= 2200 sediment crust mantle lithosphere depth of equal compensation ho= 1km hc hm (hs-ho) hs=? rC= 2800 rm= 3400 hs = ho(ra- rw) (ra- rs) = 3 (3.3-1.0) (3.3-2.2) = 6.3 km
  • 20. Calculate how much sediment would be needed to fill the Alarcon Basin up to sea level: Maximum water depth in the Alarcon Basin = 3km. Our calculation shows that ~6.3 km of sediment would be needed to fill the basin up to sea level.
  • 21. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere EXAMPLE 3 How does crustal thinning affect the depth of sedimentary basins? 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Newly-formed basin Thin crust and mantle lithosphere to half of original. How deep a basin forms in response to thinning? Solve for Z. Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z
  • 22. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha) 30rc + 90rm = rw(Z) + 15rc + 45rm + ra(120-15-45-Z) 30rc + 90rm = Zrw + 15rc + 45rm + 60ra- Zra Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc
  • 23. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Z Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc If the new basin is filled by water, what is its depth (Z)? - A: Fill with water (rw = 1.01 g/cm2) Z= 60ra-45rm-15rc (ra – rw)
  • 24. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Z Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc If the new basin is filled by water - A: Fill with water (rw = 1.01 g/cm2) Z= 60ra-45rm-15rc (ra – rw) 60(3.3)- 45(3.4)-15(2.8) (3.3-1.01) = = 3.00 2.29 = 1.31 km for water
  • 25. If crust and mantle lithosphere are thinned to half of original thickness, how deep a basin would form in response to thinning? Our calculation shows that the newly-formed basin would be ~1.3 km deep if it was filled by water.
  • 26. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Z Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc If the new basin is filled by sediment, how deep will it be? - B: Fill with sediment (rs = 2.2 g/cm2) Z= 60ra-45rm-15rc (ra – rs)
  • 27. crust mantle litho- sphere crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= 30km hc2 hm1= 90km hm2 ha Z Z(ra-rw) = 60ra-45rm-15rc Basin is formed: A: fill with water B: fill with sediment B: Fill with sediment (rs = 2.2 g/cm2) Z= 60ra-45rm-15rc (ra – rs) 60(3.3)- 45(3.4)-15(2.8) (3.3-2.3) = = 3.00 1.0 = 2.7 km for sediment
  • 28. If crust and mantle lithosphere are thinned to half of original thickness, how deep a basin would form in response to thinning? Our calculation shows that the newly-formed basin would be ~2.7 km deep if it was filled by sediment.
  • 29. (Martin-Barajas et al., 2013) EXAMPLE 3B What rifting parameters can produce the crustal structure observed in the Upper Delfin basin? Experiment with different sediment densities and different crust and mantle lithosphere initial thicknesses to find values that could produce the thicknesses shown on this cross-section.
  • 30. This cross-section spans the Delfin and Tiburon basins. The core of the Baja California peninsula (NW end of cross-section) is un-rifted crust, and its thickness (35-40 km) is a reasonable approximation of pre-rift crustal thickness. (Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
  • 31. Delfin Basin Location map, Northern Gulf of California (Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
  • 32. From the cross-section, measure and record: hc1, initial crustal thickness (use crustal thickness at the NW end of the cross-section as an estimate) hc2, crustal thickness under Delfin basin after extension (0!) hs, thickness of sediments (and intrusions at base of sediments) in Delfin basin (Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
  • 33. crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= __km hc2=0 hm1= 90km hm2=0 ha Delfin basin Solve for Z. Then see how well your answer matches sediment thick- ness Z on the cross-section Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z(=hs) Experiment #1 Use 90 km for a starting thickness of mantle lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from the cross-section.
  • 34. crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= __km hc2=0 hm1= 50km hm2=0 ha Delfin basin Solve for Z. Then see how well your answer matches sediment thick- ness Z on the cross-section Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z(=hs) Experiment #2 Use 50 km for a starting thickness of mantle lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from the cross-section.
  • 35. crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= __km hc2=0 hm1= 20km hm2=0 ha Delfin basin Solve for Z. Then see how well your answer matches sediment thick- ness Z on the cross-section Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z(=hs) Experiment #3 Use 20 km for a starting thickness of mantle lithosphere, and hc1 and hc2 values measured from the cross-section.
  • 36. crust mantle litho- sphere 1 2 hc1= __km hc2=0 hm1= 20km hm2=0 ha Delfin basin Solve for Z. Then see how well your answer matches sediment thick- ness Z on the cross-section Note: ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Z(=hs) Experiment #4 Use same thickness values you used in experiment #1, but change rs to 2400. rs varies with total sediment thickness….
  • 37. Experiment #1 rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha) and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Solve for Z. Plug in thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=90km, hc2=0, hm2=0 and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3, ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3 Solution: Z = 7.7 km (too small, does not match cross- section)
  • 38. Experiment #2 rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha) and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Solve for Z. Plug in thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=50km, hc2=0, hm2=0 and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3, ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3 Solution: Z = 11.4 km (about right, matches cross-section)
  • 39. Experiment #3 rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha) and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Solve for Z. Plug in thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=20km, hc2=0, hm2=0 and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3, ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2200 kg/m3 Solution: Z = 14.1 km (too large, does not match cross- section)
  • 40. Experiment #4 rc(hc1) + rm(hm1) = rs(Z) + rc(hc2) + rm(hm2) + ra(ha) and ha = hc1 + hm1 - hc2 - hm2 - Z Solve for Z. Plug in thickness values: hc1=35km, hm1=90km, hc2=0, hm2=0 and density values: rc=2800 kg/m3, rm=3400 kg/m3, ra=3300 kg/m3, rs=2400 kg/m3 Solution: Z = 9.4 km (about right)
  • 41. Delfin Basin Location map, Northern Gulf of California Note: These solutions assume sufficient sediment supply to keep the basin filled. That’s a good assumption here because of the very high sediment input from the Colorado River. (Martin-Barajas et al., 2013)
  • 42. Our assumption that there is sufficient sediment supply to keep the basin filled would not be a good assumption further south in the Gulf of California where basins are sediment starved. Delfin Basin Google Earth

Editor's Notes

  1. Image from page 166, Jared W. Kluesner, 2011, Marine Geophysical Study of Cyclic Sedimentation and Shallow Sill Intrusion in the Floor of the Central Gulf of California, Ph.d. thesis, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, 231 pages. (Used with permission from J. Kluesner, 2015)
  2. Martin-Barajas, A., Gonzalez-Escobar, M., Fletcher, J.M., Pacheco, M., Oskin, M., and Dorsey, R., 2013, Thick deltaic sedimentation and detachment faulting delay the onset of continental rupture in the Northern Gulf of California: Analysis of seismic reflection profiles, Tectonics, 32, 1-18, doi: 10.1002/tect.20063.
  3. Martin-Barajas, A., Gonzalez-Escobar, M., Fletcher, J.M., Pacheco, M., Oskin, M., and Dorsey, R., 2013, Thick deltaic sedimentation and detachment faulting delay the onset of continental rupture in the Northern Gulf of California: Analysis of seismic reflection profiles, Tectonics, 32, 1-18, doi: 10.1002/tect.20063.
  4. Arturo Martín-Barajas, Mario González-Escobar, John M. Fletcher, Martín Pacheco, Michael Oskin, and Rebecca Dorsey, 2013, Thick deltaic sedimentation and detachment faulting delay the onset of continental rupture in the Northern Gulf Of California: Analysis of seismic reflection profiles: Tectonics, v. 32, pp 1-18, doi:10.1002/tect.20063.
  5. Martín‐Barajas, Arturo, et al. "Thick deltaic sedimentation and detachment faulting delay the onset of continental rupture in the Northern Gulf of California: Analysis of seismic reflection profiles." Tectonics 32.5 (2013): 1294-1311.
  6. Arturo Martín-Barajas, Mario González-Escobar, John M. Fletcher, Martín Pacheco, Michael Oskin, and Rebecca Dorsey, 2013, Thick deltaic sedimentation and detachment faulting delay the onset of continental rupture in the Northern Gulf Of California: Analysis of seismic reflection profiles: Tectonics, v. 32, pp 1-18, doi:10.1002/tect.20063.