The International
Monetary System
Introduction

 The international monetary system refers
to the institutional arrangements that
countries adopt to govern exchange rates
Introduction

International monetary systems are sets
of internationally agreed rules,
conventions and supporting institutions
that facilitate international trade, cross
border investment and generally the
reallocation of capital between nation
states
Introduction
 It addresses to solve the problems
relating to international trade:
a.
b.
c.

Liquidity
Adjustment
Stability
The problem of Liquidity
 The problem of liquidity existed even in

the domestic transactions through barter
system
 Barter system was replaced by precious
metals as a medium of exchange and store
of value
 Gold standard system of international
payments came into existence
The Gold Standard
The

first modern international monetary
system was the gold standard
Put in effect in 1850
Participants – UK, France, Germany &
USA
Gold Standard- I ( 1876-1913)

●In this system, each currency was linked to
a weight of gold

●Under gold standard, each country had to
establish the rate at which its currency
could be converted to a weight of gold.
Gold Standard- I ( 1876-1913)

●Most of the countries used to declare

par value of their currency in terms of
gold

●The problem was every country needed

to maintain adequate reserves of gold in
order to back its currency
The Gold Standard
●

After World War I, the exchange rates were
allowed to fluctuate

●

Since gold was convertible into currencies
of the major developed countries, central
banks of different countries either held gold
or currencies of these developed countries
The System of Bretton Woods
( 1944-71)

 In July, 1944, 44 countries met in Bretton

Woods, New Hampshire, USA – a new
International Monetary System was
created
 John Maynard Keynes of Britain and

Harry Dexter White of USA were the key
movers
The Bretton Woods Agreement

 Creation of International Monetary Fund

(IMF) to promote consultations and
collaboration on international monetary
problems and countries with deficit balance
of payments
 Establish a par value of currency with
approval of IMF
 Maintain exchange rate for its currency
within one percent of declared par value
The Bretton Woods Agreement

 Each member to pay a quota into IMF pool –

one quarter in gold and the rest in their own
currency
 The pool to be used for lending
 Dollar was to be convertible to gold till
international instrument was introduced
 International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD) was created to
rehabilitate war-torn countries and help
developing countries
The System of Bretton Woods
( 1944-71)
 So in effect this was a gold – dollar exchange

standard ( $35/ounce)- known as fixed
exchange rate system or adjustable

peg

 Devaluation could not be resorted arbitrarily

When BOP problem became structural i.e.
repetitive, devaluation upto ten percent was
permitted by IMF
 Thus each currency was tied to dollar directly
or indirectly

Collapse of the
Fixed Exchange System
 The system of fixed exchange rates

established at Bretton Woods worked well
until the late 1960’s
 Any pressure to devalue the dollar would
cause problems throughout the world
 The trade balance of the USA became highly
negative and a very large amount of US
dollars was held outside the USA ; it was
more than the total gold holdings of the USA
Collapse of the
Fixed Exchange System

 During end of sixties, European

governments wanted gold in return for
the dollar reserves they held
 On 15th Aug. 1971, President Nixon

suspended the system of convertibility of
gold and dollar and decided for floating
exchange rate system
The end of the Bretton Woods System (1972–
81)

 The system dissolved between 1968 and

1973
 By March 1973, the major currencies

began to float against each other
The end of the Bretton Woods System (1972–
81)

IMF members have been free to choose any
form of exchange arrangement they wish
(except pegging their currency to gold):
 Allowing the currency to float freely
 Pegging it to another currency or a basket
of currencies
 Forming part of a monetary union
Exchange Systems after 1973
Exchange Rate systems are classified on

the basis of the flexibility that the
monetary authorities show towards
fluctuations in the exchange rates and
are divided into two categories:

1. Systems with a fixed exchange rate
( “fixed peg” or “hard peg”) and
2. Systems with a flexible exchange
rate
( “Floating” systems)
Exchange Systems after 1973

But as usual, between these two extreme

positions there exists also an intermediate
range of different systems with limited
flexibility, usually referred to as “soft pegs”
A fixed peg regime
A fixed peg regime exists when the

exchange rate of the home currency is
fixed to an anchor currency
This is the case with economies having
currency boards or with no separate
national currency of their own
Countries do not have a separate national
currency, either when they have formally
dollarized, or when the country is a
member of a currency union, for example
Euro
Floating Exchange Rate System
● The collapse of Bretton Woods and
Smithsonian Agreements coupled with oil
crisis of 1970, the floating exchange rate
system was adopted by leading
industrialised countries
● Officially approved in April 1978
● Under the system, the exchange rate would
be determined by market forces without the
intervention of government
Floating Exchange Rate System

●No country in the world has adopted
freely floating exchange rate system

●Floating exchange rate regimes consist of
independent floating and managed
floating systems
Independent Floating systems
In Independent Floating systems the

exchange rate is market determined
and monetary policy usually functions
without exchange rate considerations

Foreign exchange interventions are

rare and meant to prevent undue
fluctuations

But no attempt is undertaken to

achieve/maintain a particular rate
Managed Floating systems
 Managed Floating systems usually let the

market take its own course but the monetary
authorities intervene in the market to “manage”
the exchange rate, if needed, to prevent high
volatilities and to stimulate growth, without
committing to a particular exchange rate level
 The monetary authorities do not specify their
opinion on “suitable” exchange rate level
 The IMF calls this practice a “Managed Floating
With No Predetermined Path for the Exchange
Rate”
Intermediate Regimes ( Soft Pegs)

Intermediate exchange rate regimes

consist of an array of differing systems
allowing a varying degree of flexibility,
such as conventional fixed exchange rate
pegs, crawling pegs and exchange rate
bands
Conventional fixed exchange rate pegs
In a Conventional Fixed Peg arrangement

a currency is pegged at a fixed rate to a
major currency or a basket of currencies,
allowing the exchange rate to fluctuate
within a narrow margin of ±1 percent
around a formal central rate
The monetary authority intervenes in the
market, if the fluctuation is outside these
limits
Crawling Peg ( The Dirty Float)

●In this system an attempt is made to

combine the advantages of fixed exchange
rate with flexibility of floating exchange
rate

●It fixes the exchange rate at a given level

which is responsive to changes in market
conditions i.e. it is allowed to crawl
Crawling Peg ( The Dirty Float)

In a Crawling Peg arrangement the

currency is adjusted periodically “in
small amounts at a fixed rate or in
response to changes in selective
quantitative indicators (past inflation
differentials vis-à-vis major trading
partners…)

A Crawling Band allows a periodic

adjustment of the exchange rate band
itself
Crawling Peg ( The Dirty Float)
● The upper and lower limits are decided for

exchange rate depending demand and supply of
foreign exchange
● As the exchange rate crosses these limits, fiscal
and monetary policies come into play to push
the exchange rate within the target zone
● But in this case, these limits are sustained for
some time and if it is felt that economic
indicators are being disturbed, the monetary
authorities let the exchange rate depreciate or
appreciate as the case may be
Exchange Rates Since 1973
●

The merits of each continue to be debated

●

There is no agreement as to which system
is better

●

Many countries today are disappointed
with the floating exchange rate system
Implications For Managers
For managers, understanding the
international monetary system is important
for:
 Currency management
 Business strategy
 Corporate-government relations
Currency Management
Managers must recognize that the current
international monetary system is a managed
float system in which government
intervention can help drive the foreign
exchange market

Under the present system, speculative
buying and selling of currencies can create
volatile movements in exchange rates
Business Strategy
Managers need to recognize that while
exchange rate movements are difficult to
predict, their movement can have a major
impact on the competitive position of
businesses

To contend with this situation, managers
need strategic flexibility e.g. dispersing

production to different locations
Corporate-Government Relations

Managers need to recognize that
businesses can influence government
policy towards the international
monetary system

Companies should promote an
international monetary system that
facilitates international growth and
development

International monetary system

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Introduction  The internationalmonetary system refers to the institutional arrangements that countries adopt to govern exchange rates
  • 3.
    Introduction International monetary systemsare sets of internationally agreed rules, conventions and supporting institutions that facilitate international trade, cross border investment and generally the reallocation of capital between nation states
  • 4.
    Introduction  It addressesto solve the problems relating to international trade: a. b. c. Liquidity Adjustment Stability
  • 5.
    The problem ofLiquidity  The problem of liquidity existed even in the domestic transactions through barter system  Barter system was replaced by precious metals as a medium of exchange and store of value  Gold standard system of international payments came into existence
  • 6.
    The Gold Standard The firstmodern international monetary system was the gold standard Put in effect in 1850 Participants – UK, France, Germany & USA
  • 7.
    Gold Standard- I( 1876-1913) ●In this system, each currency was linked to a weight of gold ●Under gold standard, each country had to establish the rate at which its currency could be converted to a weight of gold.
  • 8.
    Gold Standard- I( 1876-1913) ●Most of the countries used to declare par value of their currency in terms of gold ●The problem was every country needed to maintain adequate reserves of gold in order to back its currency
  • 9.
    The Gold Standard ● AfterWorld War I, the exchange rates were allowed to fluctuate ● Since gold was convertible into currencies of the major developed countries, central banks of different countries either held gold or currencies of these developed countries
  • 10.
    The System ofBretton Woods ( 1944-71)  In July, 1944, 44 countries met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, USA – a new International Monetary System was created  John Maynard Keynes of Britain and Harry Dexter White of USA were the key movers
  • 11.
    The Bretton WoodsAgreement  Creation of International Monetary Fund (IMF) to promote consultations and collaboration on international monetary problems and countries with deficit balance of payments  Establish a par value of currency with approval of IMF  Maintain exchange rate for its currency within one percent of declared par value
  • 12.
    The Bretton WoodsAgreement  Each member to pay a quota into IMF pool – one quarter in gold and the rest in their own currency  The pool to be used for lending  Dollar was to be convertible to gold till international instrument was introduced  International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) was created to rehabilitate war-torn countries and help developing countries
  • 13.
    The System ofBretton Woods ( 1944-71)  So in effect this was a gold – dollar exchange standard ( $35/ounce)- known as fixed exchange rate system or adjustable peg  Devaluation could not be resorted arbitrarily When BOP problem became structural i.e. repetitive, devaluation upto ten percent was permitted by IMF  Thus each currency was tied to dollar directly or indirectly 
  • 14.
    Collapse of the FixedExchange System  The system of fixed exchange rates established at Bretton Woods worked well until the late 1960’s  Any pressure to devalue the dollar would cause problems throughout the world  The trade balance of the USA became highly negative and a very large amount of US dollars was held outside the USA ; it was more than the total gold holdings of the USA
  • 15.
    Collapse of the FixedExchange System  During end of sixties, European governments wanted gold in return for the dollar reserves they held  On 15th Aug. 1971, President Nixon suspended the system of convertibility of gold and dollar and decided for floating exchange rate system
  • 16.
    The end ofthe Bretton Woods System (1972– 81)  The system dissolved between 1968 and 1973  By March 1973, the major currencies began to float against each other
  • 17.
    The end ofthe Bretton Woods System (1972– 81) IMF members have been free to choose any form of exchange arrangement they wish (except pegging their currency to gold):  Allowing the currency to float freely  Pegging it to another currency or a basket of currencies  Forming part of a monetary union
  • 18.
    Exchange Systems after1973 Exchange Rate systems are classified on the basis of the flexibility that the monetary authorities show towards fluctuations in the exchange rates and are divided into two categories: 1. Systems with a fixed exchange rate ( “fixed peg” or “hard peg”) and 2. Systems with a flexible exchange rate ( “Floating” systems)
  • 19.
    Exchange Systems after1973 But as usual, between these two extreme positions there exists also an intermediate range of different systems with limited flexibility, usually referred to as “soft pegs”
  • 20.
    A fixed pegregime A fixed peg regime exists when the exchange rate of the home currency is fixed to an anchor currency This is the case with economies having currency boards or with no separate national currency of their own Countries do not have a separate national currency, either when they have formally dollarized, or when the country is a member of a currency union, for example Euro
  • 21.
    Floating Exchange RateSystem ● The collapse of Bretton Woods and Smithsonian Agreements coupled with oil crisis of 1970, the floating exchange rate system was adopted by leading industrialised countries ● Officially approved in April 1978 ● Under the system, the exchange rate would be determined by market forces without the intervention of government
  • 22.
    Floating Exchange RateSystem ●No country in the world has adopted freely floating exchange rate system ●Floating exchange rate regimes consist of independent floating and managed floating systems
  • 23.
    Independent Floating systems InIndependent Floating systems the exchange rate is market determined and monetary policy usually functions without exchange rate considerations Foreign exchange interventions are rare and meant to prevent undue fluctuations But no attempt is undertaken to achieve/maintain a particular rate
  • 24.
    Managed Floating systems Managed Floating systems usually let the market take its own course but the monetary authorities intervene in the market to “manage” the exchange rate, if needed, to prevent high volatilities and to stimulate growth, without committing to a particular exchange rate level  The monetary authorities do not specify their opinion on “suitable” exchange rate level  The IMF calls this practice a “Managed Floating With No Predetermined Path for the Exchange Rate”
  • 25.
    Intermediate Regimes (Soft Pegs) Intermediate exchange rate regimes consist of an array of differing systems allowing a varying degree of flexibility, such as conventional fixed exchange rate pegs, crawling pegs and exchange rate bands
  • 26.
    Conventional fixed exchangerate pegs In a Conventional Fixed Peg arrangement a currency is pegged at a fixed rate to a major currency or a basket of currencies, allowing the exchange rate to fluctuate within a narrow margin of ±1 percent around a formal central rate The monetary authority intervenes in the market, if the fluctuation is outside these limits
  • 27.
    Crawling Peg (The Dirty Float) ●In this system an attempt is made to combine the advantages of fixed exchange rate with flexibility of floating exchange rate ●It fixes the exchange rate at a given level which is responsive to changes in market conditions i.e. it is allowed to crawl
  • 28.
    Crawling Peg (The Dirty Float) In a Crawling Peg arrangement the currency is adjusted periodically “in small amounts at a fixed rate or in response to changes in selective quantitative indicators (past inflation differentials vis-à-vis major trading partners…) A Crawling Band allows a periodic adjustment of the exchange rate band itself
  • 29.
    Crawling Peg (The Dirty Float) ● The upper and lower limits are decided for exchange rate depending demand and supply of foreign exchange ● As the exchange rate crosses these limits, fiscal and monetary policies come into play to push the exchange rate within the target zone ● But in this case, these limits are sustained for some time and if it is felt that economic indicators are being disturbed, the monetary authorities let the exchange rate depreciate or appreciate as the case may be
  • 30.
    Exchange Rates Since1973 ● The merits of each continue to be debated ● There is no agreement as to which system is better ● Many countries today are disappointed with the floating exchange rate system
  • 31.
    Implications For Managers Formanagers, understanding the international monetary system is important for:  Currency management  Business strategy  Corporate-government relations
  • 32.
    Currency Management Managers mustrecognize that the current international monetary system is a managed float system in which government intervention can help drive the foreign exchange market Under the present system, speculative buying and selling of currencies can create volatile movements in exchange rates
  • 33.
    Business Strategy Managers needto recognize that while exchange rate movements are difficult to predict, their movement can have a major impact on the competitive position of businesses To contend with this situation, managers need strategic flexibility e.g. dispersing production to different locations
  • 34.
    Corporate-Government Relations Managers needto recognize that businesses can influence government policy towards the international monetary system Companies should promote an international monetary system that facilitates international growth and development

Editor's Notes

  • #31 Country Focus: The U.S. Dollar, Oil Prices, and Recycling Petrodollars Summary This feature e closing case explores what oil producing nations are likely to do with the dollars they have earned. Recently, oil prices have surged as a result of higher than expected demand, tight supplies, and perceived geopolitical risks. Since oil is priced in dollars, oil producers have seen their dollar reserves increase. Discussion of the feature can begin with the following questions. 1. What will happen to the value of the U.S. dollar if oil producers decide to invest most of their earnings from oil sales in domestic infrastructure projects? Discussion Points: If oil producers decide to invest their earnings in domestic infrastructure projects, it would be expected that the countries involved would see a boost in economic growth, and an increase in imports. This would put downward pressure on the dollar as the petrodollars are sold, or are invested in the local community, however the expected increase in imports that should result from greater economic growth would increase the demand for dollars. 2. What factors determine the relative attractiveness of dollar, euro, and yen denominated assets to oil producers flush with petrodollars? What might lead them to direct more funds towards non-dollar denominated assets? Discussion Point s: The relative attractiveness of an investment whether it is denominated in dollars, euro, or yen depends on expected returns and the degree of risk associated with the investment. When considering different currencies, it would be important to consider expected shifts in the exchange rate. So, for example, if the dollar was expected to depreciate relative to the euro or yen, non-dollar denominated assets might be more attractive all else being equal.