This presentation provides an overview of SOURCE and its integration with countries. SOURCE is a digital platform managed by SIF that supports governments' infrastructure project preparation and development. The presentation discusses SOURCE's governance structure and growth since 2010. It also highlights case studies of SOURCE's integration and customization in countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Peru, and Ukraine to meet their specific needs in areas like project management, information management, project assessment, and promotion/procurement. The presentation concludes with an overview of SOURCE's templates, approach to country integration, and measures taken for data security and sovereignty.
Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of PPPs - A...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ana-Maria RUIZ, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network of Senior PPP and Infrastructure Officials held at the OECD, Paris, on 27 March 2018
Ensuring affordability, economic viability and fiscal sustainability - Duncan...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Duncan Kernohan, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, at the 4th OECD Forum on Governance of Infrastructure held in Paris, on 17 April 2019
This presentation was held during the 5th GIB Summit, May 27-28 2015.
The presentation and more information on the Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation are available on www.gib-foundation.org
This presentation provides an overview of SOURCE and its integration with countries. SOURCE is a digital platform managed by SIF that supports governments' infrastructure project preparation and development. The presentation discusses SOURCE's governance structure and growth since 2010. It also highlights case studies of SOURCE's integration and customization in countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Peru, and Ukraine to meet their specific needs in areas like project management, information management, project assessment, and promotion/procurement. The presentation concludes with an overview of SOURCE's templates, approach to country integration, and measures taken for data security and sovereignty.
Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of PPPs - A...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ana-Maria RUIZ, OECD Secretariat, at the 11th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network of Senior PPP and Infrastructure Officials held at the OECD, Paris, on 27 March 2018
Ensuring affordability, economic viability and fiscal sustainability - Duncan...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Duncan Kernohan, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, at the 4th OECD Forum on Governance of Infrastructure held in Paris, on 17 April 2019
This presentation was held during the 5th GIB Summit, May 27-28 2015.
The presentation and more information on the Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation are available on www.gib-foundation.org
This document from the Department of Homeland Security discusses aging and failing critical infrastructure in the United States. It finds that while infrastructure age is a factor in failures, more important causes include insufficient funding for both initial construction and long-term maintenance. The funding gap is projected to grow significantly by 2040 without changes. The report recommends addressing this gap by updating laws and regulations, adopting innovative financing mechanisms, incentivizing risk mitigation and long-term planning, and investing funding more efficiently through improved collaboration and analysis.
Presented at the 4th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit 21 & 22 May 2014.
Read more about the world leading platform for Sustainable Infrastructure Finance at www.gib-foundation.org.
Next Summit: 27 & 28 May 2015 in Switzerland
Resilience Shift Policy Symposium - the role of public policy - Dr Svenja KeeleThe Resilience Shift
The Resilience Shift Policy Symposium took place on Wed 15 May 2019 in Melbourne Australia. This presentation was by Dr Svenja Keele and Professor Lars Coenen, from the University of Melbourne, who talked about the role of policy and the ‘policy spectrum’ as captured in the published report. The Symposium explored ways to incentivise resilience - by understanding the key drivers, and exploring the use of different policy approaches to enhance critical infrastructure resilience.
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face. This is a presentation by Ken Siong, Technical Director, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants.
Planning and preparing Infrastructure plans and projects - Jose Viegas, ITF, ...OECD Governance
Presentation made by Jose Viegas, International Transport Forum, OECD, at the Symposium on Governance of Infrastructure held at the OECD, Paris, on 29 February 2016
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face. This is a presentation by Dawn McGeachy, Member, IFAC SMP Committee.
What is the problem? Mapping the gaps in infrastrastructure governance today ...OECD Governance
Presentation made by Iain Begg, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, at the Symposium on Governance of Infrastructure held at the OECD, Paris, on 29 February 2016
Presentation by Prof. Alexandra Watson, the College of Accounting, University of Cape Town, on integrated reporting and the evolution of the issue and practice in South Africa given at the International Federation of Accountants’ Council Seminar, A Fundamental Shift in Corporate Reporting.
- Recent reviews of Independent Fiscal Institutions (IFIs) in Scotland, Lithuania, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom have provided emerging lessons. IFI outputs are widely viewed as credible and their leaders have become authorities, bringing improvements to fiscal transparency. However, political contexts are challenging and concerns exist over leadership changes and resources. Common themes include demands to expand narrow mandates without additional resources, and the need for more transparent forecast evaluations and systematic media monitoring. Reviews can drive changes and ensure IFI independence, information, and resources to operate sustainably and support transparency.
This document discusses access to information for parliamentary budget offices and independent fiscal institutions (IFIs/PBOs). There are differences in access rights depending on an organization's establishing legislation and agreements with government information providers. Issues that commonly arise include delays, lack of detail, and political obstacles to information access. Measures that can help address issues include memorandums of understanding outlining responsibilities, collaboration through working groups and points of contact, and agreed processes for escalating unresolved requests. Overall, establishing early information needs, maintaining open communication, and clarifying access rights and dispute resolution can support effective information sharing.
Presentation from the webinar "State-Owned Enterprises & Professional Accountancy Organizations in PFM Reform: Recovery Post COVID-19" (August 11, 2021).
The document discusses the importance of infrastructure governance and presents a framework for better governance. It notes that 10-30% of public infrastructure investment is lost due to mismanagement and corruption, and poor governance increases costs by around 40%. The framework identifies 10 dimensions of infrastructure governance, including having a strategic vision, managing integrity, ensuring affordability, generating and analyzing data, and maintaining resilience. The framework aims to help countries deliver quality infrastructure projects on time and on budget through improved governance.
Ireland: OECD review of budget oversight by Parliament - Larry Honeysett, U...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Larry Honeysett, House of Commons, United Kingdom, at the 8th meeting of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions held in Paris on 11-12 April 2016.
Presentation by Warren Allen, President, International Federation of Accountants at the Institute of Certified Public Accountant of Greece, in Athens, Greece, September 19, 2014
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face.
This document discusses fiduciary duty and climate change risks for institutional investors. It makes the following key points:
1) Institutional investors face physical, liability, and transition risks from climate change that could impact their portfolios. They need to understand and address these opportunities and risks.
2) Fiduciary duty requires putting clients' interests first, but investors currently lack information and tools to properly assess climate change risks. Disclosure and fiduciary duty must be better linked to address long-term sustainability factors.
3) Various principles and frameworks call for considering environmental and social impacts, but clarification is still needed on how fiduciaries can integrate these non-financial factors given legal interpretations of their duties. More work
Towards an integrated governance framework for infrastructure - Rolf Alter an...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Rolf Alter and Ian Hawkesworth, OECD, at the 8th Meeting of Senior Public-Private Partnerships and Infrastructure Officials held in Paris on 23-24 March 2015.
This document from the Department of Homeland Security discusses aging and failing critical infrastructure in the United States. It finds that while infrastructure age is a factor in failures, more important causes include insufficient funding for both initial construction and long-term maintenance. The funding gap is projected to grow significantly by 2040 without changes. The report recommends addressing this gap by updating laws and regulations, adopting innovative financing mechanisms, incentivizing risk mitigation and long-term planning, and investing funding more efficiently through improved collaboration and analysis.
Presented at the 4th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit 21 & 22 May 2014.
Read more about the world leading platform for Sustainable Infrastructure Finance at www.gib-foundation.org.
Next Summit: 27 & 28 May 2015 in Switzerland
Resilience Shift Policy Symposium - the role of public policy - Dr Svenja KeeleThe Resilience Shift
The Resilience Shift Policy Symposium took place on Wed 15 May 2019 in Melbourne Australia. This presentation was by Dr Svenja Keele and Professor Lars Coenen, from the University of Melbourne, who talked about the role of policy and the ‘policy spectrum’ as captured in the published report. The Symposium explored ways to incentivise resilience - by understanding the key drivers, and exploring the use of different policy approaches to enhance critical infrastructure resilience.
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face. This is a presentation by Ken Siong, Technical Director, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants.
Planning and preparing Infrastructure plans and projects - Jose Viegas, ITF, ...OECD Governance
Presentation made by Jose Viegas, International Transport Forum, OECD, at the Symposium on Governance of Infrastructure held at the OECD, Paris, on 29 February 2016
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face. This is a presentation by Dawn McGeachy, Member, IFAC SMP Committee.
What is the problem? Mapping the gaps in infrastrastructure governance today ...OECD Governance
Presentation made by Iain Begg, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, at the Symposium on Governance of Infrastructure held at the OECD, Paris, on 29 February 2016
Presentation by Prof. Alexandra Watson, the College of Accounting, University of Cape Town, on integrated reporting and the evolution of the issue and practice in South Africa given at the International Federation of Accountants’ Council Seminar, A Fundamental Shift in Corporate Reporting.
- Recent reviews of Independent Fiscal Institutions (IFIs) in Scotland, Lithuania, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom have provided emerging lessons. IFI outputs are widely viewed as credible and their leaders have become authorities, bringing improvements to fiscal transparency. However, political contexts are challenging and concerns exist over leadership changes and resources. Common themes include demands to expand narrow mandates without additional resources, and the need for more transparent forecast evaluations and systematic media monitoring. Reviews can drive changes and ensure IFI independence, information, and resources to operate sustainably and support transparency.
This document discusses access to information for parliamentary budget offices and independent fiscal institutions (IFIs/PBOs). There are differences in access rights depending on an organization's establishing legislation and agreements with government information providers. Issues that commonly arise include delays, lack of detail, and political obstacles to information access. Measures that can help address issues include memorandums of understanding outlining responsibilities, collaboration through working groups and points of contact, and agreed processes for escalating unresolved requests. Overall, establishing early information needs, maintaining open communication, and clarifying access rights and dispute resolution can support effective information sharing.
Presentation from the webinar "State-Owned Enterprises & Professional Accountancy Organizations in PFM Reform: Recovery Post COVID-19" (August 11, 2021).
The document discusses the importance of infrastructure governance and presents a framework for better governance. It notes that 10-30% of public infrastructure investment is lost due to mismanagement and corruption, and poor governance increases costs by around 40%. The framework identifies 10 dimensions of infrastructure governance, including having a strategic vision, managing integrity, ensuring affordability, generating and analyzing data, and maintaining resilience. The framework aims to help countries deliver quality infrastructure projects on time and on budget through improved governance.
Ireland: OECD review of budget oversight by Parliament - Larry Honeysett, U...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Larry Honeysett, House of Commons, United Kingdom, at the 8th meeting of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions held in Paris on 11-12 April 2016.
Presentation by Warren Allen, President, International Federation of Accountants at the Institute of Certified Public Accountant of Greece, in Athens, Greece, September 19, 2014
IFAC and the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform hosted a joint Regional Small- and Medium-sized Practices (SMP) Forum for Europe and Central Asia on May 31 in Vienna, Austria.
The Forum provided the opportunity to discuss addressing the challenges and opportunities SMPs and medium-sized entities (SMEs) face.
This document discusses fiduciary duty and climate change risks for institutional investors. It makes the following key points:
1) Institutional investors face physical, liability, and transition risks from climate change that could impact their portfolios. They need to understand and address these opportunities and risks.
2) Fiduciary duty requires putting clients' interests first, but investors currently lack information and tools to properly assess climate change risks. Disclosure and fiduciary duty must be better linked to address long-term sustainability factors.
3) Various principles and frameworks call for considering environmental and social impacts, but clarification is still needed on how fiduciaries can integrate these non-financial factors given legal interpretations of their duties. More work
Towards an integrated governance framework for infrastructure - Rolf Alter an...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Rolf Alter and Ian Hawkesworth, OECD, at the 8th Meeting of Senior Public-Private Partnerships and Infrastructure Officials held in Paris on 23-24 March 2015.
Towards an effective governance framework for infrastructure - Ronnie Downes,...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ronnie Downes, OECD, at the 11th Annual Meeting of Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Senior Budget Officials (CESEE SBO) held in Warsaw, Poland, on 21-22 May 2015.
This presentation was delivered during the 6th Meeting of the OECD Southeast Asia Regional Programme’s Regional Policy Network on Sustainable Infrastructure, which took place on 25-26 April 2022 in Manila, the Philippines. The OECD’s Public Governance Directorate and Environment Directorate teamed up with the OECD Korea Policy Centre to organise the event. The National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) of the Philippines co-chaired the event alongside the United States, and the Public Private Partnership Centre of the Philippines graciously provided the venue. For more details about the meeting, including the agenda and a short summary record, please visit: https://www.oecd.org/site/sipa/events/sipa-searp-philippines-2022.htm.
The document discusses the challenges facing the power and utilities sector in meeting the large infrastructure investment needs of over $7.2 trillion by 2025 due to population growth, GDP growth, and environmental challenges. It notes that many large capital projects in the sector suffer from cost overruns, delays, and suboptimal returns due to issues with financing, delivering assets, and managing assets long-term. It provides examples of average megaproject overspends of 35% and delays of two years and outlines five key questions organizations should ask to improve project performance in planning, analyzing, executing, and operating assets. EY offers its experience and tools to help organizations develop the right strategic approach, raise funding, control projects, manage risks,
Workshop in Infrastructure Governance Indicators in IndonesiaOECD Environment
This document provides an overview of an upcoming workshop in Indonesia on OECD Infrastructure Governance Indicators (IGIs) in South-East Asia. The workshop will map strengths and weaknesses in infrastructure governance in SEA countries using the IGIs methodology. It will involve identifying survey respondents, collecting and validating data, and presenting preliminary results. The IGIs assess various dimensions of infrastructure governance, from strategic planning and project prioritization to budgeting and monitoring. The results will be included in the Government at a Glance for SEA publication to facilitate benchmarking and sharing of best practices.
Workshop on Infrastructure Governance Indicators in the PhillipinesOECD Environment
This document discusses an upcoming virtual workshop on implementing OECD Infrastructure Governance Indicators (IGIs) in South-East Asia. It provides background on infrastructure gaps in the region and the objectives of the IGIs. The methodology for implementation in SEA countries involves identifying survey respondents, conducting a workshop, collecting and validating data, and presenting results. The document outlines the survey structure, guidelines for participants, and next steps in the Philippines. It also shares examples of IGI results for OECD countries to illustrate how data can be presented.
Towards an integrated governance framework for infrastructure - Ian Hawkeswor...OECD Governance
This presentation was made by Ian Hawkesworth, OECD, Thailand, at the 10th OECD-Asian Senior Budget Officials Annual Meeting held in Bangkok, Thailand, on 18-19 December 2014.
BUILDING THE FUTURE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND CHALLENGES .pdfpulisconstructionsau1
In the ever-evolving landscape of global development, infrastructure projects play a pivotal role in shaping the future. As societies grow and technology advances, the demand for robust and sustainable infrastructure becomes increasingly critical. This blog delves into the current trends and challenges in infrastructure development, highlighting key considerations that will shape the way we build the future.
High-quality public infrastructure supports growth, improves well-being and generates jobs. Yet, infrastructure investment
is complex, and getting from conception to construction and operation is a long road fraught with obstacles and pitfalls.
Poor governance is a major reason why infrastructure projects often fail to meet their time-frame, budget, and service delivery
objectives. This booklet outlines how governments can get infrastructure right. For further information see www.oecd.org/gov
Presented at the 4th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit 21 & 22 May 2014. Read more at www.gib-foundation.org.
Next Summit: 27 & 28 May 2015 in Switzerland
Towards a Framework for the Governance of InfrastructureOECD Governance
This working paper sets out by presenting concepts and challenges for public infrastructure followed by suggested preconditions for good infrastructure governance. It presents an infrastructure decision tree that can guide countries in assessing and balancing their specific sectoral, country, and project needs in order to select a fitting infrastructure delivery modality. www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting
United Nations General Assembly Informal dialogue on building resilience and ...Christina Parmionova
The world is at a crossroads in harnessing the potential of infrastructure connectivity. It
has been estimated that US$ 4.2 trillion can be saved by investing in more resilient
infrastructure due to reduced losses and damages, and lower recovery costs post-disaster.
For the SDGs to be achieved, and for a low-carbon, climate-resilient future to be unlocked,
US$ 6.9 trillion per year must be invested by 2030. The Sendai Framework for Disaster
Risk Reduction and the Paris Agreement call for sustainable and resilient infrastructure
to mitigate the effects of climate change and to future-proof existing assets.Reliable and s ustainable infrastructure can set countries towards a development path
marked by reduced infrastructure damage, minimized systemic risk, and fast-paced progress towards the SDGs. This will require an unprecedented scale up of investments
from both the public and private sectors. Delaying this process will only increase the costs
and lead to stagnant development, abandoned infrastructure assets, and escalating existential risk. Promoting and facilitating sustainable development through regional and inter-regional infrastructure connectivity will allow for a fast-streamed attainment of the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development across both developed and developing
countries.
Classes of Factors to be Considered in Infrastructure Investment PrioritizationBob Prieto
The prioritization of infrastructure investment must be focused on achieving the strategic objectives of the implementing agency or governmental unit while recognizing the broad role that infrastructure plays in serving society and supporting adjacent regional and national networks. Clear, robust objectives must be established; continuously articulated; alignment with affected stakeholders achieved; performance metrics established and continuously monitored and measured; and, corrective actions and portfolio adjustments made based on performance and changed futures. Many of these performance metrics will be associated with the factors to be considered in initial prioritization.
Specifically, the following categorization is suggested as a way to classify and consider the factors used in prioritization of infrastructure investments:
Doing the right things
Doing enough of the right things
Doing right things right
· Per the e-Activity, analyze one (1) of the core tenets establish.docxLynellBull52
· Per the e-Activity, analyze one (1) of the core tenets established in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Take a position on how closely following this tenet could have resulted in better protection of critical infrastructure during Hurricane Katrina. Provide a rationale for your response.
TENET #5. Collaborating To Manage Risk
The national effort to strengthen critical infrastructure security and resilience depends on the ability of public and private sector critical infrastructure owners and operators to make risk-informed decisions on the most effective solutions available when allocating limited resources in both steady-state and crisis operations. Therefore, risk management is the cornerstone of the National Plan and is relevant at the national, regional, State, and local levels. National, regional, and local resilience depend upon creating and maintaining sustainable, trusted partnerships between the public and private sector. While individual entities are responsible for managing risk to their organization, partnerships improve understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences and how to manage them through the sharing of indicators and practices and the coordination of policies, response, and recovery activities. Critical infrastructure partners manage risks based on diverse commitments to community, focus on customer welfare, and corporate governance structures. Risk tolerances will vary from organization to organization, as well as sector to sector, depending on business plans, resources, operating structure, and regulatory environments. They also differ between the private sector and the government based on underlying constraints. Different entities are likely to have different priorities with respect to security investment as well as potentially differing judgments as to what the appropriate point of risk tolerance may be. Private sector organizations generally can increase investments to meet their risk tolerances and provide for their community of stakeholders, but investments in security and resilience have legitimate limits. The government must provide for national security and public safety and operates with a different set of limits in doing so. Finding the appropriate value proposition among the partners requires understanding these differing perspectives and how they may affect efforts to set joint priorities. Within these parameters, critical infrastructure security and resilience depend on applying risk management practices of both industry and government, coupled with available resources and incentives, to guide and sustain efforts. This section is organized based on the critical infrastructure risk management framework, introduced in the 2006 NIPP and updated in this National Plan. The updates help to clarify the components and streamline the steps of the framework, depicted in Figure 3 below. Specifically, the three elements of critical infrastructure (physical, cyber, and human) are explicitly i.
This document provides an overview of debt restructuring options and the Indian port sector. It discusses infrastructure development and financing in India, with a focus on the objectives of the project, key issues, and fiscal incentives. It then provides details on the Indian port sector and Gujarat Adani Ports Limited (GAPL), the company developing the Mundra Port. GAPL's promoters, board of directors, and business development efforts are summarized.
IRJET- E-Krisenseva: A Web-App based Portal for Real Time Disaster Manage...IRJET Journal
This document describes a web application called e-KrisenSeva that was created for real-time disaster management. It includes features like shelter navigation and resource allocation, communication tools, and both online and offline capabilities. The app was built using Apache Cordova, which allows web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to be used to create hybrid mobile apps. It aims to improve disaster response by providing information and reducing delays through its navigation and communication features.
IRJET- Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Management and Maintenance of Urban...IRJET Journal
This document discusses analyzing risk factors that affect the management and maintenance of urban transportation infrastructure. It begins with an abstract that outlines challenges facing urban transportation systems in developing countries, including high demand that exceeds existing road capacity. The document then aims to identify risk factors that influence the performance and lifespan of transportation facilities over their lifecycle. It discusses conducting a survey of experts to determine common and frequently occurring risks. Key risks identified through literature review include management risks, operational risks, environmental risks, political/government risks, technological risks, construction risks, project finance risks, and other risks like natural disasters. The methodology involves collecting data on risks through questionnaires, analyzing the responses using a Likert scale to rate the likelihood and impact of each risk,
The infrastructure sourcebook provides an overview of infrastructure issues, current challenges, and proposals for managing challenges over the next 25 years. It aims to inform policymakers, leaders, and development practitioners. The sourcebook defines infrastructure components, identifies lessons from case studies, and discusses the government's roles in areas like regulations, planning, commissioning, operations, and supply chain management. It also outlines the design and delivery process for infrastructure projects.
An Introduction To ICT Continuity Based On BS 25777Yasmine Anino
This document discusses business continuity management (BCM) and information and communications technology (ICT) continuity. It provides an introduction to key elements of ICT continuity based on the British Standard BS 25777. ICT continuity focuses on protecting critical ICT services, detecting incidents, reacting appropriately, recovering services, operating in disaster recovery mode, and returning to normal operations. It is an important part of overall BCM to ensure organizations can continue critical business processes and meet objectives during disruptions. The document outlines principles, strategies, and testing for effective ICT continuity management aligned with organizational needs.
Similar to Infrastructure resilience in light of COVID-19 (20)
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Yong Lim, Professor of Economic Law at Seoul National University School of Law, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Professor Alex Robson, Deputy Chair of Australia’s Productivity Commission, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation comprises highlights from the publication OECD Competition Trends 2024 published in Paris on 6 March 2024 during the OECD Competition Open Day. The full publication can be accessed at oe.cd/comp-trends.
This presentation by Cristina Camacho, Head of Cabinet and Head of International Relations, Portuguese Competition Authority, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by William E. Kovacic, Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy and Director, Competition Law Center, The George Washington University, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by John E. Kwoka, Neal F. Finnegan Distinguished Professor of Economics, Northeastern University, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Amelia Fletcher CBE, Professor of Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by the OECD Secretariat was made during the discussion “Ex-post Assessment of Merger Remedies” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eamr.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by John Davies, Member, UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Simon Roberts, Professor, Centre for Competition, Regulation and Economic Development, University of Johannesburg, was made during the discussion “Use of Economic Evidence in Cartel Cases” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/egci.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Serbia was made during the discussion “Alternatives to Leniency Programmes” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/atlp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Italy was made during the discussion “Alternatives to Leniency Programmes” held at the 22nd meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/atlp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Daniel CRANE, Richard W. Pogue Professor of Law, University of Michigan, was made during the discussion “Out-of-Market Efficiencies in Competition Enforcement” held at the 141st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 6 December 2023. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/omee.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
More from OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs (20)
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
BONKMILLON Unleashes Its Bonkers Potential on Solana.pdfcoingabbar
Introducing BONKMILLON - The Most Bonkers Meme Coin Yet
Let's be real for a second – the world of meme coins can feel like a bit of a circus at times. Every other day, there's a new token promising to take you "to the moon" or offering some groundbreaking utility that'll change the game forever. But how many of them actually deliver on that hype?
Seminar: Gender Board Diversity through Ownership NetworksGRAPE
Seminar on gender diversity spillovers through ownership networks at FAME|GRAPE. Presenting novel research. Studies in economics and management using econometrics methods.
2. Elemental Economics - Mineral demand.pdfNeal Brewster
After this second you should be able to: Explain the main determinants of demand for any mineral product, and their relative importance; recognise and explain how demand for any product is likely to change with economic activity; recognise and explain the roles of technology and relative prices in influencing demand; be able to explain the differences between the rates of growth of demand for different products.
In a tight labour market, job-seekers gain bargaining power and leverage it into greater job quality—at least, that’s the conventional wisdom.
Michael, LMIC Economist, presented findings that reveal a weakened relationship between labour market tightness and job quality indicators following the pandemic. Labour market tightness coincided with growth in real wages for only a portion of workers: those in low-wage jobs requiring little education. Several factors—including labour market composition, worker and employer behaviour, and labour market practices—have contributed to the absence of worker benefits. These will be investigated further in future work.
Independent Study - College of Wooster Research (2023-2024) FDI, Culture, Glo...AntoniaOwensDetwiler
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
Lecture slide titled Fraud Risk Mitigation, Webinar Lecture Delivered at the Society for West African Internal Audit Practitioners (SWAIAP) on Wednesday, November 8, 2023.
Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition 2024, by Libby...Donc Test
Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition 2024, by Libby, Hodge, Verified Chapters 1 - 13, Complete Newest Version Solution Manual For Financial Accounting, 8th Canadian Edition by Libby, Hodge, Verified Chapters 1 - 13, Complete Newest Version Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Chapters Download Stuvia Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Solution Manual For Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Chapters Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Financial Accounting 8th Canadian Edition Pdf Download Stuvia
Role of Information Technology in Revenue - Prof Oyedokun.pptx
Infrastructure resilience in light of COVID-19
1. 1
Janos Bertok
Deputy Director
Public Governance Directorate
Janos.Bertok@oecd.org
Infrastructure resilience in light of covid-19:
a governance perspective
2. Why is resilience of critical infrastructure essential?
2
Why is resilience important in all types of infrastructure projects?
> COVID-19 has also increased the vulnerability of end users to other disasters
> Disruptive shocks to infrastructure services can result not only from a lack of supply, but also from a surge
in demand (e.g. to internet service providers or electricity).
> While COVID-19 does not impact the physicality of infrastructure assets, it can have an impact on
maintenance, and the availability of back and front office staff to ensure service provision
> The continuity of critical services in emergency responses sustains the production and delivery of public
health and safety measures
> Telework and transportation of essential workers and goods is needed for the economy to continue safely
Infrastructure resilience in the context of COVID-19
4. Including resilience considerations in the decision-making process
4
> A robust strategic planning framework takes into account uncertainty and is flexible enough
to enable adjustments over time to reflect changing conditions
> Resilience requires proper scanning, identification and assessment of potential risks
> Scenario planning can be an important tool in risk analysis and to identify governance gaps
> Adequate selection and prioritization process must consider resilience costs and benefits
> The roles and responsibilities for resilience investments and liabilities should be clear and
previously defined
Infrastructure investment is subject to high levels of uncertainty
and it is not always clear who shares the responsibility of a risk
5. 5
Infrastructure providers prepare business continuity plans to
help prepare and respond to unexpected and extreme events
> Service providers that invest in back-up systems and capacity sharing protocols across
their industry will be better prepared to maintain service levels
> Prioritizing only essential maintenance procedures, running reduced services at off peak
times and working to ensure the continued health and safety of workers will ensure
operators can provide critical, whilst maybe not optimal services
Ensuring infrastructure resilience in times of crisis
6. 6
Shared nature of ownership and operation between public and
private stakeholders can pose governance challenges
Working with the private sector to strengthen resilience efforts
> Establishing trust between governments and operators is a key step towards securing
information sharing on risks and vulnerabilities
> Building partnerships with operators is an effective way to agree on a common vision and
achievable resilience objectives
> Promoting appropriate trade-offs between regulatory approaches and voluntary
collaboration can boost resilience strategies
> International cooperation fosters resilience in transboundary infrastructure systems
7. Transboundary cooperation in critical infrastructure systems
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AA A BB B
OECD (2020), OECD Indicators on Governance of Critical Infrastructure Resilience
8. 8
Government often have limited data on potential risks and
threats
Data management and monitoring
> Provide data and information about past risks and potential threats to inform better
decision-making
> Monitor performance and potential vulnerabilities over the asset life cycle and ensure
reporting to implement corrective mechanisms
> Understand complex (inter-)dependencies and vulnerabilities across critical infrastructure
systems
9. Level of government understanding of complex (inter-)dependencies and
vulnerabilities across critical infrastructure systems
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AA A BB B
OECD (2020), OECD Indicators on Governance of Critical Infrastructure Resilience
10. How can the OECD
support the work on infrastructure
resilience?
10
11. 11
The OECD Recommendation on the governance of Infrastructure
An implementation toolkit with
good practices on infrastructure
governance to effectively attain
sustainable growth
Forward-looking vision for country
reviews and reports, providing
tailored policy recommendations
for more resilient infrastructure
Key tool to advance dialogue on
infrastructure planning, investment
and delivery to generate long-
lasting effects
Regulatory
framework
Integrity Evidence Life cycle
performance
Resilience
Strategic
vision
Fiscal
Sustainability
affordability
and VfM
Procurement Stakeholder
participation
Multilevel
governance
12. 12
OECD (2019), OECD Reviews of Risk Management Policies: Good Governance for Critical Infrastructure Resilience, OECD Publishing, Paris
1. Create a multi-sector governance
structure
2. Understand (inter-)dependencies and
vulnerabilities
3. Establish trust and secure information-
sharing
4. Build partnerships for common
resilience vision
5. Define policy-mix tools
6. Ensure accountability and monitoring
7. Address transboundary dimension
OECD Policy Toolkit on Governance of Critical Infrastructure Resilience