Workshop on Infrastructure Governance Indicators in the Phillipines
1. 1
OECD Infrastructure Governance Indicators (IGIs) in
South-East Asia
Virtual workshop
6 November 2023
Jacobo Pastor Garcia Villarreal
Senior Specialist on Integrity and
Procurement Policies
jacobo.garciavillarreal@oecd.org
2. Infrastructure gaps present a major challenge
SEA has a growing influence on the world economy and an
ambitious regional integration roadmap
Infrastructure gaps present a major challenge for deepening
regional economic integration and connectivity within the
ASEAN Economic Community
2
Over 60% of global carbon emissions derive from existing
infrastructure systems
3. Need for a balance between economic development and climate action
Infrastructure is central to deliver on the objectives of the Paris
Agreement on climate change
Despite strong economic growth, SEA is still looking for ways to
implement the deep reforms for sustainable and inclusive
growth
3
What is built in the next five years in fast-growing Asia will set
emission trajectories for decades to come
4. Objectives of the Infrastructure Governance Indicators
Map strengths and
weaknesses in
infrastructure
governance
Provide tools for self-
assessment
Contribute to discussion
on relationship between
infrastructure
governance and
outcomes
Provide deeper
understanding of the
different dimensions of
infrastructure
governance
Draw attention to data
availability to measure
infrastructure
governance
Allow countries to identify
changes in performance
across time
6. 6
Potential SEA country participants and entities in the Philippines
Coordinating entity
NEDA
Other entities
Department of Transportation (DOTr)
Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)
Department of ICT
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA)
Department of Energy (DOE)
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)-Water Resources Management Office (WRMO)
National Water Resources Board (NWRB)
Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA)
Department of Agriculture (DA)
Department of Finance (DOF)
Department of Budget and Management (DBM)
Public Private Partnership Center (PPPC)
Implementing agency
OECD
SEA countries
7. Steps for the implementation of the IGIs
Identification of survey respondents
Workshop for survey respondents
Data collection and validation
Discussion and presentation of
results
8. 8
Offers practical guidance for efficient, transparent and
responsive decision-making and delivery
Covers the entire life cycle of infrastructure projects
Puts special emphasis on regional, social, gender, and
environmental considerations.
Comes at a time with stronger pressures to achieve
sustainable long-term growth
OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Infrastructure (2020)
10. 10
Long-term strategic vision for
infrastructure
Infrastructure plan and
project prioritisation
Planning coordination
mechanisms
Political consensus and
stakeholder participation
in the long-term plan
Alignment of the plan
with strategic objectives
Alignment of the plan
with budget allocations
Monitoring and vision
update
Sub-pillars
(weighted)
Variables
(weighted)
Level of stakeholder
participation
Plan subject to parliament
discussions
Plan discussed and approved
by the cabinet
Pillar
Q. What is the level of
participation of stakeholders
during the formulation of the long-
term national infrastructure plan?
Q. Which tools are used to
promote political consensus
during the formulation of the
infrastructure strategy?
Survey
questions
Structure of the pillar on strategic vision
11. Before starting, take into account the following points
Each country can only submit one set of answers
Countries are required to answer all the mandatory questions
There are 3 types of questions: single-answer, multiple-answer and comments
Some questions are conditional i.e. they should be answered only if certain answers are
selected in the preceding question
12. Useful tips and glossary
When the answer option ‘other’ is selected, respondents are advised to specify and
provide additional information.
Respondents are advised to provide additional information, including references and
weblinks to support their answers, where applicable. This helps in data validation and the
identification of examples of best practices to illustrate in the Government at a Glance
publication.
A glossary is provided with the survey. In cases where the definitions suggested do not
match those used in your country, respondents are advised to use the comment boxes to
provide the definition used in their country and clarify their choice of response.
13. How to answer the survey?
The survey monitors policies and arrangements in place at the national/federal level
during the survey implementation and does not cover practices at subnational levels.
The survey covers different elements and stages of infrastructure governance. This
demands co-ordination across institutions to accurately answer the survey.
Respondents are advised to answer the survey based on the policies and arrangements in
place for infrastructure in general. In the instances where the question is answered
based on a specific sector(s), respondents are advised to specify the sectors applicable in
the comment boxes.
14. Main sectors for the purpose of the survey
(Inland) transport infrastructure refers to the assets and networks that support transport systems, including road,
rail, inland waterways, maritime ports and airports.
Energy infrastructure refers to the physical assets, networks and grids for the generation, transmission and
distribution of energy.
Water infrastructure refers to the physical assets and networks used for water supply, treatment, storage,
transmission, water resource management, wastewater treatment and flood prevention.
Social infrastructure refers to physical facilities and spaces used to provide social services, such as healthcare,
education and training, social housing programs, justice and public safety provisions, culture, sports and recreational
facilities.
Government office buildings are office buildings used by public authorities (e.g. government departments,
government agencies, public bodies).
15. How will data be used?
An assessment tool to identify strengths and areas for
improvement
Evidence to improve governance and deliver better and
more accessible public services
SE Asia Government at a Glance will also provide a
platform for the participating countries to exchange
information and learn from one another
Each indicator in the publication is presented in a user-
friendly format, consisting of graphs and/or charts
illustrating variations across countries
Examples of best practices will be illustrated to support
the data presented in the publication
16. Next steps for the implementation of the IGIs in the Phillipines
August-October
2023
• Introduction of the project
• Identification of survey
respondents
November-
December 2023
• Workshop with the
potential survey
respondents
• Data collection
January-
February 2024
• Data validation and
cleaning
• Development of the
composite indicators
March 2024
• Workshop to present the
preliminary results
18. 18
An example of data presentation
Source: 2020 and 2022 OECD Surveys on the Governance of Infrastructure
19. 19
Many countries have aligned their infrastructure plan with multiple
policy objectives
Source: 2020 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
20. 20
Most countries have goals and targets in the long-term plan to
promote sustainable infrastructure
Source: 2020 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
21. 21
Many countries have guidelines for integrating green considerations
into infrastructure planning
Source: 2022 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
22. 22
Need for greater use of methodologies to accommodate long-term goals
Source: 2020 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
23. 23
Need for greater use of methodological tools to integrate green
considerations into project prioritisation
Source: 2022 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
100.0%
63.0%
46.2%
67.9%
44.4%
34.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Environmental impactassessment Climate impactassessment Integration ofadaptation measures into
design
%
of
countries
Required Used for projectselection and prioritisation
24. 24
Many countries estimate costs covering the entire life cycle to assess
affordability of new projects
Source: 2020 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
25. 25
Most countries use a combination of financial and qualitative criteria
to identify proposals offering the best value for money
Source: 2020 OECD Survey on the Governance of Infrastructure
27. 27
Why is strategic planning important?
Sound long-term strategic planning is indispensable for the successful
prioritisation of infrastructure projects in support of sustainability
Good infrastructure planning requires alignment with a country’s development aims,
economic conditions and climate commitments across sectors.
Weak or insufficient planning disrupts infrastructure delivery impeding resource
optimisation, coordination, implementation and operation.
Designing a clear and coherent long-term strategic plan is challenging, yet integrating
some pivotal processes can help propel countries towards quality infrastructure.
28. 28
Structure of the pillar on strategic vision and potential respondents
Long-term strategic vision for
infrastructure
Infrastructure plan and
project prioritisation
Planning coordination
mechanisms
Political consensus and
stakeholder participation
in the long-term plan
Alignment of the plan
with strategic objectives
Alignment of the plan
with budget allocations
Monitoring and vision
update
14 survey questions
29. Glossary of relevant terms
Long-term national infrastructure plan
politically sanctioned document that demands concrete action in terms of infrastructure services to society over the
long-term
addresses multi-faceted infrastructure issues, cutting across a multiplicity of actors, sectors and interests
should be anchored in central agencies, have substantial input from policy departments, sub-national governments,
civil society, and business stakeholders
Medium-term expenditure framework
a framework for integrating fiscal policy and budgeting over the medium-term (typically over a 3-5 year period)
involves systematic linkages between (a) aggregate fiscal forecasting, (b) maintaining detailed medium-term
budget estimates reflecting existing government policies, and (c) maintaining compliance with a normative fiscal
framework
a key objective is to establish multi-year expenditure ceilings which are effective for the purposes of planning and
prioritisation
30. Glossary of relevant terms
Short list
a list of specific priority projects (within a long-term plan) for which there is
political commitment to make it happen within the medium term
may apply to specific government programmes for an electoral cycle
Stakeholder participation
all the ways in which stakeholders can be involved in the policy cycle and in
service design and delivery, including information, consultation, and
engagement
31. [QI1] Does your country have a national cross-sectoral infrastructure plan*? Please provide links to the document
if applicable.
Survey questions on the existence of national infrastructure plans
31
[QI2] Does your country have national sectoral infrastructure plans*? Please provide links to the documents if
applicable.
Yes
No
Yes
No
32. [QI4] Does the national infrastructure plan* explicitly consider how to align the infrastructure strategic vision with
the following policies?
Survey question on alignment of the infrastructure plan with strategic
objectives
32
National long-term vision or other national document setting strategic priorities
Land use and spatial planning instruments
Environmental or climate action plans
Human rights commitments
Inclusion and gender mainstreaming
Regional development plans
The plan does not explicitly consider how to align the vision with other development policies
Other (please specify)
33. Survey question on sustainability goals and targets
33
[QI5] Does the national infrastructure plan* explicitly establish goals and targets to promote the following policy
objectives in sustainable infrastructure?
Cross-sector synergies to avoid duplications and minimise negative environmental impacts (e.g.,
greenhouse gas emissions, waste generation, biodiversity loss)
Resource efficiency in the construction and operation of infrastructure assets
Assessment, upgrade and retrofitting of existing infrastructure assets to improve their environmental
performance
Investment in infrastructure projects that are key to enable the implementation of sustainability initiatives
(e.g., circular economy systems, sustainable mobility, net-zero carbon emissions, climate change
mitigation and adaptation)
Research and development (R&D) to promote environmentally-friendly infrastructure design,
construction, operation and decommissioning
None of the above
Other (please specify)
35. 35
Why is fiscal sustainability and value for money important?
Methodologies for ensuring value for money, affordability and fiscal
sustainability of infrastructure projects are indispensable to improve
the investment decision-making process
Guarding fiscal sustainability, affordability, and value for money of infrastructure projects
requires dedicated processes, a capable organization and relevant skills.
Rigorous project appraisal and selection processes can help pay due consideration to social
and economic efficiency (taking into account economic, social, fiscal, environmental and
climate-related costs and benefits) and take into account the full cycle of the asset.
Supplementing cost-benefit analysis with other methodological tools to accommodate
multiple objectives and uses – such as infrastructure sustainability – helps establish
the overall societal return on investments.
36. 36
Structure of the pillar on value for money
Fiscal sustainability, affordability, and
value for money
Budgeting for multi-year
projects and cost
estimations
Contingent liabilities
Project appraisal and
selection
Independent assessment
Infrastructure risk
management
10 survey questions
37. Glossary of relevant terms
Affordability
taking into account the entire life cycle costs of infrastructure projects
from a government’s perspective → projects can be accommodated within the current and future budget constraints
from the end-users perspective → the ability and willingness to pay the tariffs or other user charges associated with
the access and use of the infrastructure asset
Contingent liabilities
liabilities whose budgetary impact is dependent on future events, which may or may not occur
common examples include government loan guarantees, government insurance programmes, and legal claims
against the government
Value for money
includes both qualitative and quantitative aspects
defined as what government considers to be an optimal combination of quality features and price, calculated over the
whole of the project’s lifetime
38. Survey questions on contingent liabilities
38
[QII3] How are contingent liabilities* associated with new infrastructure projects managed?
Contingent liabilities are disclosed in accrual and accounting analysis
Contingent liabilities are disclosed in budget documentation
Contingent liabilities are regularly monitored
No specific mechanism for contingent liability management
Other (please specify)
[QII2] Is there a formal requirement to identify contingent liabilities* associated with new infrastructure projects?
Contingent liabilities* borne by the government are identified
Government’s exposure to fiscal risks is measured
Costs of bearing contingent liabilities* are estimated
No formal requirement
Other (please specify)
39. Survey questions on risk allocation in infrastructure projects
39
[QII10] Which types of tools does the government use to support an adequate allocation of risks related to
infrastructure projects? Please provide additional information, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
National strategy for risk management
Central guidelines and methodologies to identify, measure and allocate risks in new infrastructure projects
Special functions or units for risk analysis and management
Guarantee funds that limit liabilities for government support to the value of its capitalisation
Tools to monitor risk allocation
None
Other (please specify)
41. 41
Why is efficient and effective public procurement important?
Procurement strategies based on strategic choices ensure infrastructure
delivery in a way that maximises the value generated for society as a
whole
For quality infrastructure investment, procurement processes should be directed towards
generating broader value in terms of economic, environmental and social benefits.
Procurement can also be used strategically for incentivising innovation, in particular in the
transition towards low-carbon infrastructure and the adoption of digital technologies.
In accommodating these policy goals, procurement processes should also safeguard
transparency and objectivity.
42. 42
Structure of the pillar on procurement
Efficient and effective public
procurement
Open, neutral and transparent
procurement
Competitive procurement
processes
Bidder Selection
Delivery mode
Procurement workforce
Strategic use of public
procurement to achieve key
policy objectives
Balanced contractual
relationships
13 survey questions
43. Glossary of relevant terms
E-procurement
integration of digital technologies in the replacement or redesign of paper-based
procedures throughout the procurement process
Open tendering
offers the maximum level of competition, allowing for emerging suppliers to try securing
work
for large projects, a pre-qualification process might take place producing a short-list of
suitable suppliers who then will be invited to tenders
Single-source procurement
the non-competitive purchase of goods or services that takes place after negotiating
with only one supplier
44. Survey questions on delivery mode
44
[QIII6] Are there methodologies and guidelines for choosing the delivery mode of infrastructure projects? Please
indicate which entity is in charge of defining the methodologies, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
Yes, applicable to all infrastructure projects
Yes, applicable to some projects depending on the sector
Yes, for projects above a certain threshold
No methodologies available
Other (please specify)
45. Survey questions on strategic use of public procurement
45
[QIII8] Are standardised frameworks to measure success against the objectives in the question above in place?
Please provide additional information, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
[QIII7] Does your country provide support to procurement officers on how to harness infrastructure procurement to
achieve the following objectives? Please specify the type of support, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
Promote innovation
Promote responsible business conduct*
Promote gender equality
Promote environmental protection
Promote social policy objectives (e.g. inclusiveness, wage inequality)
Guidelines do not include any mention of these objectives
Other (please specify)
Yes
No
47. 47
Why is environmental sustainability and climate-resilience important?
Integrating environmental and climate considerations into
infrastructure decision making can help support the health, safety and
resilience of societies in current and future climates
Infrastructure decisions made today will have enduring consequences for the environment
and might lock-in vulnerability if they fail to consider climate change impacts.
The climate transition will depend to a large extent on governments’ ability to deliver
environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient infrastructure.
Strengthening the quality of governments’ steering is thus key to delivering on greener and
cleaner infrastructure targets nationally and internationally, and to engage with the private
sector and the civil society to work collectively towards achieving these objectives.
48. 48
Structure of the sub-pillar on enabling conditions
7 survey questions
Enabling conditions
Integrating environmental
and climate considerations
into the regulatory
framework
Consultation on
environmental impacts
Environmental and climate
data
Infrastructure green
procurement
49. 49
Structure of the sub-pillar on planning
8 survey questions
Planning
Integrating environmental
considerations into the
strategic vision
Planning for Nature-based
Solutions
Climate planning
Planning for biodiversity
Co-ordination across
sectors and levels of
government
50. 50
Structure of the sub-pillar on project prioritization and appraisal
8 survey questions
Project prioritisation and
appraisal
Environmental Impact
Assessment
Climate impact
considerations in project
appraisal
Climate adaptation
considerations in project
appraisal
51. 51
Structure of the sub-pillar on green capital budgeting and
infrastructure financing
7 survey questions
Green capital budgeting and
infrastructure financing
Green capital budgeting
Infrastructure green
financing
Accounting for natural
assets
52. 52
Structure of the sub-pillar on monitoring environmental and climate
impact throughout the life cycle
3 survey questions
Monitoring environmental and
climate impact throughout the
life cycle
Ex post analysis
Monitoring compliance
with environmental and
climate regulations
Mitigating environmental
and climate change
risks
53. Glossary of relevant terms
Green budgeting
the use of budgetary policy-making tools helping to achieve environmental and climate goals
includes evaluating the environmental impact of budgetary and fiscal policies and assessing their coherence
towards the delivery of national and international commitments
Green financing
stands for 'financing the green economy' or 'financing the green transition’
corresponds to the aim of increasing the level of financial flows towards green investment
Green public procurement
a process whereby public authorities seek to procure goods, services and works with a reduced environmental
impact throughout their life cycle when compared to goods, services and works with the same primary function
that would otherwise be procured
54. Glossary of relevant terms
Life cycle of public infrastructure
the series of stages during the lifetime of a public infrastructure asset, starting from planning, prioritisation and
funding, to the design, procurement, construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning
Nature-based solutions (NbS)
actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater,
coastal and marine ecosystems
address social, economic and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively
simultaneously provide human well-being, ecosystem services and resilience and biodiversity benefits
Resilience
the capacity of systems to absorb a disturbance, recover from disruptions and adapt to changing conditions
while retaining essentially the same function as prior to the disruptive shock at an acceptable service level
55. [QIV7] Does your country consider the following environmental and climate dimensions when developing national
or sectoral infrastructure strategies? Please specify the sectors, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
Survey questions on planning for environmentally sustainable and
climate-resilient infrastructure
55
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
Transition to a circular economy*
Pollution prevention and control
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
No
56. [QIV9] Are there mechanisms to ensure that infrastructure strategies and plans in the transport infrastructure*
sector contribute to nationally determined contributions (NDCs), net-zero strategies, long-term low emission
development strategies (LT-LEDS) or other overarching climate change strategy on mitigation? Please specify the
mechanisms, including relevant weblinks and/or references.
Survey questions on integrating green considerations into planning
for transport
56
[QIV11] Are infrastructure strategies and plans in the transport infrastructure* sector aligned with biodiversity
commitments, national biodiversity strategies and action plans or similar strategies?
Yes
No
Yes
No
57. DRAFT / UNDER DEVELOPMENT 57
For more information, please contact:
Jacobo Pastor Garcia Villarreal (jacobo.garciavillarreal@oecd.org)
X (Twitter): @Jacobo_Pastor_Garcia