SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 413
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands
on nitrogen removal via denitrification
E. Racchetti • Marco Bartoli • E. Soana •
D. Longhi • R. R. Christian • M. Pinardi •
P. Viaroli
Received: 30 April 2009 / Accepted: 25 May 2010 / Published
online: 17 June 2010
� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
Abstract Wetland ecosystems in agricultural areas
often become progressively more isolated from main
water bodies. Stagnation favors the accumulation of
organic matter as the supply of electron acceptors
with water renewal is limited. In this context it is
expected that nitrogen recycling prevails over nitro-
gen dissipation. To test this hypothesis, denitrifica-
tion rates, fluxes of dissolved oxygen (SOD),
inorganic carbon (DIC) and nitrogen and sediment
features were measured in winter and summer 2007
on 22 shallow riverine wetlands in the Po River Plain
(Northern Italy). Fluxes were determined from incu-
bations of intact cores by measurement of concen-
tration changes or isotope pairing in the case of
denitrification. Sampled sites were eutrophic to
hypertrophic; 10 were connected and 12 were
isolated from the adjacent rivers, resulting in large
differences in nitrate concentrations in the water
column (from 5 to 1,133 lM). Benthic metabolism
and denitrification rates were investigated by two
overarching factors: season and hydrological
connectivity. SOD and DIC fluxes resulted in respi-
ratory quotients greater than one at most sampling
sites. Sediment respiration was coupled to both
ammonium efflux, which increased from winter
to summer, and nitrate consumption, with higher
rates in river-connected wetlands. Denitrification
rates measured in river-connected wetlands (35–
1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1) were up to two orders of
magnitude higher than rates measured in isolated
wetlands (2–231 lmol N m-2 h-1), suggesting a
strong regulation of the process by nitrate availabil-
ity. These rates were also significantly higher in
summer (9–1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1) than in winter
(2–365 lmol N m-2 h-1). Denitrification supported
by water column nitrate (DW) accounted for 60–
100% of total denitrification (Dtot); denitrification
coupled to nitrification (DN) was probably controlled
by limited oxygen availability within sediments.
Denitrification efficiency, calculated as the ratio
between N removal via denitrification and N regen-
eration, and the relative role of denitrification for
organic matter oxidation, were high in connected
wetlands but not in isolated sites. This study confirms
the importance of restoring hydraulic connectivity of
riverine wetlands for the maintenance of important
biogeochemical functions such as nitrogen removal
via denitrification.
Keywords Denitrification � Benthic respiration �
N-regeneration � Hydrological connectivity �
Riverine wetlands
E. Racchetti � M. Bartoli (&) � E. Soana �
D. Longhi � M. Pinardi � P. Viaroli
Department of Environmental Sciences, University
of Parma, Viale G.P. Usberti 33/A, 43100 Parma, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
R. R. Christian
Department of Biology, East Carolina University,
Greenville, NC, USA
123
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9477-7
Introduction
Coastal eutrophication and dystrophy have become
common globally as nutrient inputs from rivers,
particularly nitrogen loads, result in profound modi-
fication of coastal biogeochemistry (Nixon 1995;
Smith et al. 2006; Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Thus,
both the scientific and environmental management
communities interested in nutrient loadings have
increased focus on those inland areas where nutrients
are generated and on nutrient transport and transfor-
mations in freshwater bodies (Schaller et al. 2004;
Arango et al. 2006; Boyer et al. 2006). In northern Italy
nitrate contamination of surface and groundwater is
particularly relevant in the Po River Plain, and the
potential for removal of nitrogen has significant
consequences to eutrophication of receiving coastal
ecosystems. The Po River is one of the most significant
freshwater source to the Mediterranean basin and
affects the trophic state of the shallow northern
Adriatic Sea (Provini and Binelli 2006).
Nitrogen transformations result from different bio-
geochemical processes including biological uptake,
abiotic sedimentation, nitrification, ammonification,
nitrate reduction to ammonium, denitrification and
anammox, the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium
(Brandes et al. 2007; Burgin and Hamilton 2007;
Jetten 2008). Among these, microbially mediated
denitrification and anammox are the only processes
that remove inorganic nitrogen from land and water
and displace it into the atmosphere (Schubert et al.
2006; Seitzinger et al. 2006). Studies reporting simul-
taneous measurements of denitrification and anammox
in eutrophic freshwater environments are very limited
but indicate that the contribution of denitrification to
N2 fluxes is generally [90% (Trimmer et al. 2003;
Schubert et al. 2006; Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009).
Among freshwater and marine ecosystems, the most
efficient nitrate removal has been measured in wet-
lands, largely due to the anoxic and organic wetland
sediments (Bachand and Horne 2000). But not all
wetlands function similarly (Brinson 1993a, b; Brin-
son et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosselink 2000; Lin 2006),
and there is a need to determine how different classes
of wetlands contribute to nitrogen transformations and
removal.
Hydrogeomorphic conditions of wetlands affect
the physicochemical characteristics of water and
sediments which in turn regulate denitrification and
nitrogen removal. Hydrology, climate and basin
geomorphology are main components that determine
establishment and maintenance of a wetland’s
hydrogeomorphology (Brinson 1993a, b; Mitsch and
Gosselink 2000). Among hydrogeomorphic condi-
tions, hydrological connectivity is relevant in those
heavily exploited geographical areas where (1) the
control of water flow in rivers impedes flooding and
lateral interaction with riparian areas and (2) land
use by agriculture has turned wetlands into isolated
patches. In waterlogged soils, nitrate availability,
autochthonous organic matter and anaerobic condi-
tions are essential factors for the denitrification
process, but they are not sufficient to establish a
significant nitrogen removal efficiency. Morphology
and topographic position in the landscape, together
with the distribution of water sources (groundwater,
surface inflow or precipitation), turnover time and
hydrodynamics influence the degree to which chem-
icals are transported to or from wetlands (Brinson
1993a, b; Brinson et al. 1998).
Understanding how denitrification is regulated in
wetlands is a difficult target as environmental
features often interact dynamically, making it diffi-
cult to identify a prevailing factor, if indeed one
exists. Nitrate is supplied to sediments from nitrifi-
cation or by diffusion from the water column and its
concentration is in general positively correlated with
denitrification rates (Reinhardt et al. 2006; Sirived-
hin and Gray 2006). In anaerobic wetland sediments,
coupled nitrification–denitrification is limited, so the
anaerobic respiration may be supported by external
nitrate input—e.g. by agricultural runoff or previ-
ously nitrified sewage effluent (Verhoeven et al.
2006). Nitrate advected through the sediment from
groundwater is potentially an important source,
especially in areas with contaminated aquifers (Sei-
tzinger et al. 2006). Co-occurring processes often
make it difficult to separate the effect of temperature
on denitrification rates alone. Increasing tempera-
tures stimulate ammonification, nitrification and
benthic respiration that could promote denitrification
process (Bachand and Horne 2000; Sirivedhin and
Gray 2006; Hernandez and Mitsch 2007). Simulta-
neously, at elevated temperatures, low oxygen
solubility and high rates of aerobic respiration result
in oxygen deficits and enhanced anaerobic mineral-
ization processes, such as sulfate reduction, that
may inhibit denitrification and favor DNRA, the
336 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
dissimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonium
(Brunet and Garcia-Gil 1996; Piña-Ochoa and
Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). Increasing temperatures
enhance also macrophytic or microphytobenthic N
uptake, a process that competes with nitrification and
denitrification (Sundbäck et al. 2000; Bartoli et al.
2003; Risgaard-Petersen 2004). Nitrate removal in
wetlands is also regulated by the availability of
organic matter and its macromolecular quality
(Bastviken et al. 2005; Sirivedhin and Gray 2006).
Further, nitrate removal efficiency is inversely
correlated with the ratio between litter C and
NO3
-
concentration in the water column, while
other pathways, such as DNRA, are favored (Tiedje
1988; Ingersoll and Baker 1998; Gardner and
McCarthy 2009). Water pH is rarely examined as
it is usually not perceived as detrimental to denitri-
fying metabolism (Kadlec and Knight 1996).
The overall aim of this study was to evaluate the
factors regulating denitrification and assess the
importance of hydrological connectivity of riverine
wetlands on nitrogen removal efficiency. We hypoth-
esize that wetlands with limited hydrological con-
nectivity with adjacent rivers are characterized by
low nitrogen removal via denitrification. We mea-
sured nitrate removal via denitrification in conjunc-
tion with benthic respiration, inorganic nitrogen
exchange and, potentially regulating, environmental
factors. Denitrification was measured consistently
by the isotope pairing technique (IPT) in a number
of shallow riverine wetlands located in the Po
River Plain (Northern Italy). The wetlands were
characterized by degree of connectivity with the
adjacent water bodies (the Po, the Oglio and the
Mincio Rivers). To our knowledge, no studies have
reported denitrification and benthic flux measure-
ments in shallow freshwater wetlands of the Po Plain,
despite their recognized importance as nitrogen
receivers and transformers. This study represents
one of the most spatially extensive investigation of
nitrogen cycling within the wetlands of a large
watershed using the same methodological approach.
Materials and methods
Study area
All 22 sites from this study are small-sized and
shallow aquatic wetlands located in the Po River
Plain, within the basins of the Po, Oglio and Mincio
Rivers, in the provinces of Cremona and Mantova,
Northern Italy (Fig. 1; Table 1). The Po River Plain is
characterised by intensive agricultural practices, live-
stock farming and breeding (Marchetti 1993). The
studied wetlands are eutrophic to hypertrophic and are
undergoing rapid infilling; most of them are included
in the Oglio Nord, Oglio Sud, and Mincio Natural
Parks. We sampled seven oxbow lakes or old mean-
ders, six ponds, four freshwater marshes of which
three are old peat bogs, two riverine wetlands
and three shallow eutrophic lakes. All are colonized
by aquatic plants (emergent, submersed, floating
macrophytes and pleustophytes) and have permanent
Oglio
Mincio
Po
MI1 MI3
MI4
OG3
OG11
OG7
OG2
PO7
OG6
OG8
OG9
OG10
OG1
N
0 10 20 km
PO2
MI2
PO1
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
OG4
OG5
Oglio
Mincio
Po
MI1 MI3
MI4
OG3
OG11
OG7
Fig. 1 Location of the 22
sampling sites in the Po
River Plain (Northern Italy)
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 337
123
T
a
b
le
1
M
a
in
fe
a
tu
re
s
o
f
th
e
sa
m
p
li
n
g
si
te
s;
in
th
e
se
c
o
n
d
c
o
lu
m
n
,
C
a
n
d
I
in
d
ic
a
te
c
o
n
n
e
c
te
d
a
n
d
is
o
la
te
d
w
e
tl
a
n
d
s
L
o
c
a
ti
o
n
(c
o
d
e
)
H
y
d
ro
lo
g
ic
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
ti
v
it
y
a
n
d
w
a
te
r
so
u
rc
e
T
y
p
o
lo
g
y
G
e
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
a
l
c
o
o
rd
in
a
te
(G
a
u
ss
–
B
o
a
g
a
)
S
u
rf
a
c
e
(m
2
)
M
e
a
n
d
e
p
th
(m
)
D
o
m
in
a
n
t
m
a
c
ro
p
h
y
te
s
L
a
ti
tu
d
e
L
o
n
g
it
u
d
e
G
a
b
b
io
n
e
ta
(O
G
1
)
C O
g
li
o
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
5
0
0
8
0
8
5
1
5
9
5
9
8
2
8
0
,7
0
0
0
.5
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
T
y
p
h
a
la
ti
fo
li
a
,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
G
a
m
b
a
ra
(O
G
2
)
C O
g
li
o
a
n
d
G
a
m
b
a
ra
R
iv
e
rs
,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
P
o
n
d
5
0
0
4
8
7
5
1
6
0
2
1
9
2
4
,1
0
0
0
.5
T
y
p
h
a
la
ti
fo
g
li
a
,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
G
e
rr
e
G
a
v
a
z
z
i
(O
G
3
)
C O
g
li
o
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
5
0
0
2
8
8
0
1
6
0
5
9
6
9
3
8
,5
0
0
1
.5
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s
R
u
n
a
te
D
x
(O
G
4
)
C O
g
li
o
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
5
0
0
2
8
0
9
1
6
0
6
4
9
4
1
,8
0
0
0
.8
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
R
u
n
a
te
S
n
(O
G
5
)
C O
g
li
o
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
5
0
0
2
8
1
3
1
6
0
6
6
3
6
2
,9
0
0
0
.9
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
C
à
N
u
o
v
e
B
e
rn
in
i
(O
G
6
)
C O
g
li
o
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
P
o
n
d
5
0
0
3
0
5
5
1
6
1
0
5
2
4
6
,6
0
0
1
.2
C
e
ra
to
p
h
y
ll
u
m
d
e
m
e
rs
u
m
,
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
,
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s
L
a
g
o
d
i
M
e
z
z
o
1
(M
I1
)
C M
in
c
io
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
S
h
a
ll
o
w
e
u
tr
o
p
h
ic
la
k
e
5
0
0
3
3
1
4
1
6
4
0
8
1
4
1
2
,4
0
0
1
.5
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
,
N
y
m
p
h
a
e
a
,
a
lb
a
,
T
ra
p
a
n
a
ta
n
s
L
a
g
o
d
i
M
e
z
z
o
2
(M
I2
)
C M
in
c
io
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
S
h
a
ll
o
w
e
u
tr
o
p
h
ic
la
k
e
5
0
0
2
9
8
0
1
6
4
1
3
7
6
1
6
,8
0
0
2
.5
–
L
a
g
o
d
i
M
e
z
z
o
3
(M
I3
)
C M
in
c
io
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
S
h
a
ll
o
w
e
u
tr
o
p
h
ic
la
k
e
5
0
0
2
7
4
2
1
6
4
1
8
8
2
2
5
,0
0
0
1
.5
T
ra
p
a
n
a
ta
n
s
G
o
it
o
(M
I4
)
C M
in
c
io
R
iv
e
r,
su
rf
a
c
e
in
fl
o
w
R
iv
e
ri
n
e
w
e
tl
a
n
d
5
0
1
5
6
0
2
1
6
3
4
7
7
4
5
,5
0
0
0
.6
V
a
ll
is
n
e
ri
a
sp
ir
a
li
s
B
in
e
(O
G
7
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
4
9
9
9
0
7
9
1
6
1
2
8
7
6
1
2
0
,8
0
0
1
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
338 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
T
a
b
le
1
c
o
n
ti
n
u
e
d
L
o
c
a
ti
o
n
(c
o
d
e
)
H
y
d
ro
lo
g
ic
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
ti
v
it
y
a
n
d
w
a
te
r
so
u
rc
e
T
y
p
o
lo
g
y
G
e
o
g
ra
p
h
ic
a
l
c
o
o
rd
in
a
te
(G
a
u
ss
–
B
o
a
g
a
)
S
u
rf
a
c
e
(m
2
)
M
e
a
n
d
e
p
th
(m
)
D
o
m
in
a
n
t
m
a
c
ro
p
h
y
te
s
L
a
ti
tu
d
e
L
o
n
g
it
u
d
e
M
o
si
o
(O
G
8
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
M
a
rs
h
(o
ld
p
e
a
t
b
o
g
)
4
9
9
9
2
7
6
1
6
1
7
4
8
4
2
,3
0
0
0
.3
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
T
y
p
h
a
la
ti
fo
li
a
,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
M
a
rc
a
ri
a
(O
G
9
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
M
a
rs
h
(o
ld
p
e
a
t
b
o
g
)
4
9
9
7
2
6
0
1
6
2
1
1
4
0
1
0
,9
0
0
0
.5
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
B
e
lf
o
rt
e
(O
G
1
0
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
M
a
rs
h
(o
ld
p
e
a
t
b
o
g
)
4
9
9
2
7
8
6
1
6
2
1
0
2
3
3
,9
0
0
0
.3
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
,
N
y
m
p
h
a
e
a
a
lb
a
,
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
T
y
p
h
a
la
ti
fo
li
a
,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
B
o
g
in
a
(O
G
1
1
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
R
iv
e
ri
n
e
w
e
tl
a
n
d
4
9
8
6
5
4
8
1
6
2
5
5
9
2
6
6
,2
0
0
0
.5
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
T
y
p
h
a
la
ti
fo
li
a
,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
G
e
rr
e
d
e
’
C
a
p
ri
o
li
(P
O
1
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
4
9
9
2
2
0
9
1
5
8
2
4
7
4
1
,5
0
0
0
.5
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s
L
a
n
c
o
n
e
(P
O
2
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
O
x
b
o
w
la
k
e
4
9
8
6
9
1
6
1
5
8
2
4
3
7
6
1
,9
0
0
0
.4
T
ra
p
a
n
a
ta
n
s
L
a
z
z
a
re
tt
o
(P
O
3
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
P
o
n
d
4
9
9
1
4
2
4
1
5
8
4
9
5
8
1
2
,5
0
0
1
.5
S
p
ir
o
d
e
la
p
o
ly
rr
h
iz
a
,
L
e
m
n
a
g
ib
b
a
,
W
o
lf
fi
a
a
rr
h
iz
a
G
e
rr
e
U
g
o
la
n
i
(P
O
4
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
P
o
n
d
4
9
8
9
5
3
9
1
5
8
4
9
9
7
3
,9
0
0
0
.8
C
e
ra
to
p
h
y
ll
u
m
d
e
m
e
rs
u
m
,
M
y
ri
o
p
h
y
ll
u
m
sp
ic
a
tu
m
,
P
o
ta
m
o
g
e
to
n
c
ri
sp
u
s
C
à
d
e
’
G
a
tt
i
(P
O
5
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
P
o
n
d
4
9
9
1
3
5
3
1
5
8
9
2
8
2
2
,8
0
0
1
.4
S
p
ir
o
d
e
la
p
o
ly
rr
h
iz
a
,
L
e
m
n
a
m
in
o
r,
L
e
m
n
a
g
ib
b
a
,
W
o
lf
fi
a
a
rr
h
iz
a
C
a
sc
in
a
S
.
M
a
rg
h
e
ri
ta
(P
O
6
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
P
o
n
d
4
9
9
1
2
7
4
1
5
9
0
2
9
5
2
,0
0
0
0
.7
N
u
p
h
a
r
lu
te
u
m
,
C
e
ra
to
p
h
y
ll
u
m
d
e
m
e
rs
u
m
O
st
ig
li
a
(P
O
7
)
I G
ro
u
n
d
w
a
te
r
d
is
c
h
a
rg
e
M
a
rs
h
4
9
9
6
1
5
7
1
6
6
5
8
6
8
1
4
,8
0
0
0
.9
P
h
ra
g
m
it
e
s
a
u
st
ra
li
s,
T
y
p
h
a
sp
p
.,
C
a
re
x
sp
p
.
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 339
123
standing water (depth [0.25 m). We categorized the
22 wetland sites by both Hydrogeomorphic Classifi-
cation (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosselink
2000; Lin 2006) and Functional Classification of
European Wetlands (Simpson 2002). The wetlands
exhibit different degrees of hydraulic connectivity
with the adjacent rivers (Table 1). Connectivity was
assessed from map elevation and hydrological data
(water levels) of the considered rivers (Technical
Regional Maps of Lombardy Region http://www.
cartografia.regione.lombardia.it; AdBPo 2001–2008).
All wetlands were also directly surveyed in order to
detect interventions/alterations, e.g. embankments,
levees or berms. Ten sites are permanently connected:
OG1–OG6 and MI4 have an inlet river channel while
MI1–MI3 represent a river digression with unidirec-
tional water movement. These ten wetlands are clas-
sified as ‘‘Riverine wetland with surface inflow and
unidirectional flow’’ (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and
Gosselink 2000; Lin 2006) or as ‘‘Eastern Continental
River Marginal Wetlands belonging to unconfined
channel sub-type—ECRM2H3P’’ (Simpson 2002).
The remaining 12 wetlands are isolated because of
canal infilling, weirs and embankments. The primary
water sources in the isolated wetlands are ground-
water, precipitation and runoff, with the water
movement due largely to vertical fluctuation. They
are classified as ‘‘Isolated depression supplied by
groundwater discharge and characterized by vertical
fluctuation’’ (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosse-
link 2000; Lin 2006) or as ‘‘Eastern Continental River
Marginal Wetlands belonging to separated channel
sub-type—ECRM3H2P’’ (Simpson 2002).
Sampling program
We sampled water and sediments during winter
(January–March) and summer (June–August) 2007.
Intact sediments were collected at each site with
transparent Plexiglas cores with different dimensions
(diameter 9 length) for sediment characterization
(5 9 30 cm, n = 3) and flux measurements (8 9
40 cm, n = 4). All cores were transferred in a box
with cooled site water and brought to the laboratory
within a few hours of sampling for further processing
and incubation. Also, on each sampling date, approx-
imately 100 l of water were collected and brought to
the laboratory for cores maintenance and incubations.
During sampling, site water was characterized for
temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen with a YSI Multi-
Probe (model 556, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) and
dissolved inorganic carbon and nitrogen (see later for
analytical methods).
Sediment characteristics
Benthic microalgal biomass was measured as chlo-
rophyll-a (Chl-a) concentration in the top 0.5 cm of
sediment and determined spectrophotometrically
after extraction with 90% acetone (Lorenzen 1967).
Bulk density was determined as the ratio between wet
weight and volume (typically 5 ml) of sediment.
Organic matter content (OM) was measured as
percentage of weight loss by ignition (450�C, 2 h)
from dried sediment. Total C and N content were
determined from dried sediments with a Carlo Erba
elemental analyzer (CHNS-O EA 1108).
Dissolved oxygen, inorganic carbon and nutrient
flux measurements
Intact cores preincubation and incubation proce-
dures followed the standardized protocol described
by Dalsgaard et al. (2000). In the laboratory, all
cores were immediately submersed with the top
open in a tank containing in situ aerated and well
mixed water at ambient temperature. During prein-
cubation, water was stirred inside the tubes and
headwater exchange with the tank water was
ensured by Teflon-coated magnetic bars suspended
5 cm above the sediment–water interface to mini-
mize particle resuspension and driven by an external
motor at 40 rpm.
The day after the sampling, the water in the tank
was exchanged and the cores were incubated for
flux measurements of O2 (or sediment oxygen
demand, SOD), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC),
and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN = NH4
?
?
NO2
-
? NO3
-
). Incubations were started by lower-
ing the water in the tank just below the top of the
cores and by sealing the cores with floating lids
provided with a sampling port. The cores were
incubated in the dark at field temperature for 2–5 h
with continuous stirring. Incubation time was set to
keep oxygen concentration at the end to within 20%
of the initial value.
340 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it
http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it
Water samples (60 ml) were collected at regular
time intervals using plastic syringes from the water
phase (750 ml). Samples for O2 determinations were
transferred to glass vials (Exetainer, Labco, High
Wycombe, UK) and Winkler reagents were added
immediately (Strickland and Parsons 1972). Samples
for DIC were also transferred in glass vials and
immediately titrated with 0.1 N HCl (Anderson et al.
1986). Samples for NH4
?
, NO3
-
and NO2
-
determi-
nations were filtered through Whatman GF/F glass
fiber filters, transferred to plastic vials and frozen.
NH4
?
was determined spectrophotometrically using
salicylate and hypochlorite in the presence of sodium
nitroprussiate (Bower and Holm-Hansen 1980).
NO3
-
was determined after reduction to NO2
-
in
the presence of cadmium, and NO2
-
was determined
spectrophotometrically using sulphanilamide and
N-(1-naphtyl)ethylendiamine (Golterman et al. 1978).
Fluxes of O2, DIC, NH4
?
, NO2
-
and NO3
-
were
calculated from the changes in concentrations in the
cores with time by linear regression and expressed as
rate per square meter. Negative fluxes indicate flux
from the water column to the sediment while positive
fluxes indicate effluxes from sediment to the water
column.
From dark fluxes of inorganic carbon and oxygen
we calculated the respiratory quotient RQ (Dilly
2003; Hargrave et al. 2008), according to the
following equation:
RQ ¼
CO2 flux
O2 fluxj j
:
Denitrification measurements
The isotope pairing technique (Nielsen 1992) was
used to measure denitrification (dark rates) on the
same set of cores used for solute fluxes. Incubations
for solute fluxes and denitrification were sequential
and both performed the day after the sampling. The
water in the tank was renewed between the two
incubations, and the open cores were submersed for a
couple of hours. The IPT allows for differentiation of
total denitrification (Dtot), denitrification of nitrate
diffusing to the anoxic sediment from the water
column (DW) and denitrification of nitrate produced
within the sediment due to nitrification (DN).
Methodological concerns have been raised about
the IPT, mainly due to the concurrence of anammox
which cannot be discriminated from denitrification as
a source of N2 and makes invalid the assumptions on
which IPT calculations are based. Recent studies
showed that anammox can contribute half or more of
the N2 production in coastal shelves and deep seas
(Dalsgaard et al. 2005; Trimmer et al. 2006), while it
represents a minor fraction of N2 production in
eutrophic and organic-rich freshwater ecosystems
(Burgin and Hamilton 2007; Koop-Jakobsen and
Giblin 2009). Therefore, we adopted the IPT as we
considered this method as accurate for freshwater
eutrophic sites, assuming that the anammox contri-
bution was negligible to N2 fluxes (Risgaard-Petersen
et al. 2003; Trimmer et al. 2003; Schubert et al. 2006;
Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009).
At the beginning of the experiment, the water in
the tank was lowered just below the top of the cores;
and a water subsample (5 ml) was taken from each
core for NO3
-
concentration measurement. Different
amounts of
15
NO3
-
from a 15 mM Na
15
NO3 solution
were then added to the water column of each of the 4
replicate cores to perform a concentration series
experiment (see Dalsgaard et al. 2000). Labelled
nitrate was added to the cores to have a final
15
N
atom% of at least 30%. Within 5 min of the addition
of
15
NO3
-
another water sample was collected from
each core to calculate the
14
N/
15
N ratio in the NO3
-
pool; the cores were then closed with floating lids and
the incubation started (3–5 h). At the end of the
incubation, 5–10 ml of ZnCl2 (7 M) was added to the
water phase, and then sediment and water were
mixed. An aliquot of the slurry was transferred to a
12.5 ml gas-tight vial;
14
N
15
N and
15
N
15
N abundance
in N2 were analyzed by mass spectrometry at the
National Environmental Research Agency, Silkeborg,
Denmark (Risgaard-Petersen and Rysgaard 1995).
The denitrification rates were calculated according to
the equations and assumptions of Nielsen (1992).
Denitrification rates were also estimated from
sediment oxygen demand and concentrations of
nitrate and dissolved oxygen with the model by
Christensen et al. (1990):
DW ¼ FO2 � a �
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 þ
DNO�
3
DO2
�
CNO�
3
CO2
�
1
a
� �
s
� 1
" #
where FO2 is the dark sediment oxygen demand, a is
the ratio between depth-specific denitrification and
O2 consumption activity (*0.8, Christensen et al.
1990), DNO�
3
and DO2 are the diffusion coefficients of
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 341
123
nitrate and oxygen, and CNO�
3
and CO2 are the water
column nitrate and oxygen concentrations, respec-
tively. Modeled rates represent denitrification of
nitrate diffusing into anoxic sediments from the
water column.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (ver.
16.0) to test for significant differences between
seasons and between hydrological connectivity of
wetlands. Inferential testing was done for every
measured variable (temperature, sedimentary oxygen
demand, dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes, respira-
tory quotient, ammonium fluxes, oxidized forms of
inorganic nitrogen fluxes, denitrification rates,
organic matter content, benthic microalgal biomass,
and bulk density).
We did not use parametric statistics because of
violations of assumptions of normality (Kolmogorov–
Smirnov test with Lilliefors significance correction)
and homogeneity of variance (Levene test). Even after
the application of the Cox–Box method, for log
transformations, normality was not verified, largely as
a result of frequent outliers.
Therefore the non-parametric Wilcoxon paired-
sample T test was used to test the differences between
winter and summer distributions (n1 = n2 = 22), and
the Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for
differences between isolated and connected wetlands
(n1 = 24 and n2 = 20). When the Wilcoxon test was
significant, we analyzed the hydrological connectiv-
ity after separating the winter and the summer data
(n1 = 12 and n2 = 10). We identified the correlative
relationship among variables with the Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficient (q). Differences were
considered non-significant if P [ 0.05.
Results
General features of water column and surface
sediments
Environmental conditions in both the water column
and sediments were measured in association with rate
measurements (Tables 2, 3). Water temperature
medians were 10�C (range 5–13�C) in winter and
25�C (range 22–27�C) in summer. Water column pH
was alkaline in both seasons and ranged between 7.21
and 8.57. DIC concentrations ranged from 1.90 to
7.07 mM in winter and from 2.07 to 6.63 mM in
summer; no significant differences were found
between seasons and between connected and isolated
sites. Dissolved CO2 saturation, calculated from
temperature, pH and DIC data, indicated a general
supersaturation in the water column with significant
differences between winter and summer periods
(median 217%, range 147–464% and median 581%,
range 155–4,173%, respectively; Wilcoxon T test,
P  0.001). In particular, for summer, we found
higher percentages of CO2 saturation values in
isolated than in connected sites (Mann–Whitney U
test, P  0.05).
Dissolved O2 concentrations were significantly
higher in winter than in summer (Wilcoxon T test,
P  0.01), while percentages of dissolved O2 satura-
tion were similar between seasons. In winter, median
values of % O2 saturation were close to 100% for
both wetland types (97% in isolated and 85% in
connected sites). In summer, % O2 saturation tended
to be lower at isolated sites (median value 63%) and
hypoxia established in wetlands colonized by Lemn-
aceae (Table 2).
Nitrate concentrations were extremely variable
and were not significantly different between seasons
(Wilcoxon T test, P = 0.3) (Table 2). In wetlands
permanently connected with the river, median values
of nitrate concentrations were not different between
seasons (360 lM in winter and 367 lM in summer),
but were significantly higher than those measured at
isolated sites (Mann–Whitney U tests, P  0.001).
Here, nitrate contents were significantly greater in
winter (median 10 lM) than in summer (median
2 lM). According to the predictions of the model
proposed by Christensen et al. (1990), the NO3
-
:O2
ratios of connected sites were theoretically favorable
to denitrification, with similar or higher availability
of nitrate compared to oxygen in bottom waters
(Table 2).
Sediment OM content, Chl-a concentrations and
bulk density were not statistically different between
seasons (Table 3). OM content and bulk density
ranges were typical of environments characterized by
elevated sedimentation rates, soft and reducing
sediment, and anaerobic metabolism. Sediment OM
content was significantly higher and bulk density was
significantly lower in isolated compared to connected
342 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
T
a
b
le
2
H
y
d
ro
c
h
e
m
ic
a
l
v
a
ri
a
b
le
s
m
e
a
su
re
d
in
w
a
te
r
sa
m
p
le
s
c
o
ll
e
c
te
d
in
w
in
te
r
a
n
d
su
m
m
e
r
2
0
0
7
fr
o
m
th
e
2
2
sa
m
p
li
n
g
si
te
s
a
re
re
p
o
rt
e
d
;
in
th
e
se
c
o
n
d
c
o
lu
m
n
,
C
a
n
d
I
in
d
ic
a
te
c
o
n
n
e
c
te
d
a
n
d
is
o
la
te
d
w
e
tl
a
n
d
s
S
it
e
s
H
y
d
ro
lo
g
ic
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
ti
v
it
y
p
H
[D
IC
]
(m
M
)
C
O
2
sa
t
(%
)
[O
2
]
(l
M
)
O
2
sa
t
(%
)
[N
O
3
-
]
(l
M
)
[N
O
3
-
]:
[O
2
]
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
W
in
te
r
S
u
m
m
e
r
O
G
1
C
8
.3
6
8
.1
2
6
.0
7
6
.1
0
3
2
6
7
9
1
3
7
7
1
1
9
1
0
7
4
5
3
5
5
3
6
3
1
.3
4
3
.0
5
O
G
2
C
8
.2
9
8
.3
8
6
.1
4
7
.0
3
3
8
8
5
2
0
4
0
8
1
4
7
1
1
6
5
6
3
6
4
4
7
9
1
.2
9
3
.2
6
O
G
3
C
8
.3
5
8
.0
1
6
.5
2
6
.3
9
3
2
8
1
0
1
1
1
6
1
8
7
4
6
3
3
1
1
3
3
6
8
1
7
.0
4
8
.2
3
O
G
4
C
8
.2
0
8
.2
5
5
.2
1
5
.2
9
3
5
2
5
1
6
3
6
5
3
1
7
1
0
3
1
2
0
8
1
9
3
7
0
2
.2
4
1
.1
7
O
G
5
C
8
.1
3
8
.3
6
6
.1
6
5
.0
8
4
6
4
9
0
9
3
0
0
6
0
2
8
5
2
2
7
8
2
1
6
8
9
3
.1
4
1
.1
4
O
G
6
C
8
.3
5
8
.0
4
6
.0
9
4
.5
4
3
2
5
7
5
6
2
8
9
2
5
2
8
2
9
5
5
7
1
9
6
0
2
.3
8
4
.2
1
M
I1
C
8
.2
5
8
.5
7
3
.0
3
3
.3
2
1
7
8
1
5
5
3
0
4
2
9
7
8
6
1
1
2
6
0
5
1
0
.2
0
0
.1
7
M
I2
C
8
.2
6
8
.5
4
3
.2
5
3
.3
1
1
8
7
1
6
4
3
0
2
2
8
9
8
6
1
0
9
6
0
5
8
0
.2
0
0
.2
0
M
I3
C
8
.2
3
8
.5
1
3
.0
3
3
.2
6
1
8
2
1
7
3
3
0
1
2
9
2
8
5
1
1
0
5
7
2
8
0
.1
9
0
.1
0
M
I4
C
8
.1
9
8
.1
2
2
.2
4
2
.3
1
2
6
3
3
3
0
3
2
0
2
1
9
9
1
8
3
7
1
1
1
1
0
.2
2
0
.5
1
O
G
7
I
8
.5
7
8
.2
6
7
.0
3
6
.2
1
2
1
3
6
4
2
1
8
1
1
9
2
5
1
7
3
3
1
0
.0
2
0
.0
1
O
G
8
I
8
.3
6
7
.2
1
5
.3
8
4
.0
7
2
7
6
4
1
7
3
3
2
3
1
3
6
9
2
5
1
6
1
0
0
.0
2
0
.0
7
O
G
9
I
8
.3
4
8
.2
4
7
.0
7
4
.3
8
3
8
7
4
1
9
3
5
3
1
4
1
1
0
0
5
3
1
3
1
1
3
0
.0
4
1
.2
0
O
G
1
0
I
8
.4
3
8
.0
9
5
.0
8
4
.3
9
2
1
2
6
5
2
3
1
0
2
4
0
8
8
9
1
1
3
1
0
.0
4
0
.0
0
O
G
1
1
I
8
.4
6
7
.3
1
6
.0
6
3
.1
6
2
2
1
2
2
9
9
2
2
4
5
4
5
6
4
2
0
6
8
0
9
0
.3
6
0
.0
2
P
O
1
I
8
.2
0
8
.2
9
3
.1
5
3
.0
5
2
5
9
1
0
7
1
4
0
1
2
4
5
1
1
4
9
3
3
1
1
0
.0
8
0
.0
0
P
O
2
I
8
.1
3
8
.1
3
2
.3
0
3
.3
3
1
6
3
1
0
3
5
3
4
4
1
0
8
9
8
4
1
4
2
0
.0
1
0
.0
2
P
O
3
I
8
.4
4
8
.0
1
4
.2
8
4
.0
1
1
6
3
7
5
4
5
0
0
7
1
1
4
2
2
7
3
1
0
.0
1
0
.0
1
P
O
4
I
8
.3
7
8
.2
6
3
.3
7
2
.0
7
1
4
7
1
9
7
4
8
2
2
9
1
1
3
7
1
1
0
1
3
1
0
.0
3
0
.0
0
P
O
5
I
8
.3
6
8
.0
8
3
.0
1
3
.2
0
1
5
3
4
6
1
4
8
5
6
3
1
3
7
2
4
4
2
1
0
.0
1
0
.3
3
P
O
6
I
8
.1
3
8
.0
6
3
.0
1
6
.3
8
2
0
1
2
6
4
3
4
3
1
1
5
9
7
4
3
6
2
0
.0
2
0
.0
2
P
O
7
I
8
.2
0
8
.2
6
3
.0
4
3
.1
6
1
9
8
3
3
1
3
0
0
2
4
7
8
5
9
3
1
1
4
9
0
.3
8
0
.0
4
A
ll
sa
m
p
le
s
w
e
re
c
o
ll
e
c
te
d
c
lo
se
to
th
e
se
d
im
e
n
t
su
rf
a
c
e
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 343
123
wetlands (Mann–Whitney U tests, P  0.01 and
P  0.001, respectively), likely due to their pensile
and stagnant condition. Higher values of OM were
observed in marshes (old peat bogs) and in ponds
characterized by pleustonic communities. Chl-a con-
centrations were high and similar among sites and
seasons. Sediment C:N ratio displayed a large
variability among sites and no statistical differences
were found between wetland types in both winter and
summer.
Benthic processes
As expected, season had effects on benthic processes,
and these are likely related to temperature differ-
ences. SOD was significantly correlated with water
temperature (Spearman q = -0.379, P  0.05) and
with bulk sediment density (Spearman q = 0.332,
P  0.05) but not with OM content in sediments
(Spearman q = -0.162, P = 0.3); SOD increased
from winter to summer (median values -1.14 and
-2.54 mmol O2 m
-2
h
-1
, respectively) (Wilcoxon T
test, P  0.05) (Fig. 2). Significant differences of
SOD rates were found between isolated and con-
nected wetlands only in winter (Mann–Whitney U
tests, P  0.01) whilst in summer no statistical
differences resulted (Mann–Whitney U tests,
P = 0.1) (Fig. 2). In a number of sites, DIC effluxes
tended to increase from winter to summer, but they
were not significantly correlated with water temper-
ature (Spearman q = 0.193, P = 0.3). Differences
between seasons were also not significant (Wilcoxon
T test, P = 0.2) with median values of 1.95 (range
0.64–16.70) and 3.61 (range 0.41–11.06) mmol DIC
m
-2
h
-1
in winter and in summer, respectively.
Inorganic carbon effluxes corresponding to SOD rates
in place and time resulted in variable respiratory
quotients in both seasons (RQ) (Fig. 2). RQ medians
were slightly above 1 in winter and in summer, with
values of 1.21 (range 0.52–11.33) and 1.29 (range
0.11–6.95), respectively (Wilcoxon T test, P = 0.5).
The inorganic nitrogen fluxes were evaluated for
patterns associated with season and connectivity
(Fig. 3). Ammonium fluxes underwent a great spatial
and seasonal variability. Differences between seasons
were statistically significant (Wilcoxon T test,
P  0.05) with lower values in winter (median -5,
range -462 to 864 lmol N m-2 h-1) than in sum-
mer (median 345, -676 to 2,670 lmol N m-2 h-1)
when fluxes were mainly directed from sediment to
the water column (Fig. 3). No statistical differences
were identified among wetland types, although during
winter in connected wetlands ammonium flux tended
to be directed from the water to the sediment (Mann–
Whitney U test, P = 0.1). A significant correlation
was found between ammonium fluxes and SOD
(Spearman q = 0.480, P  0.01), temperature
(Spearman q = 0.452, P  0.01) and bulk sediment
density (Spearman q = -0.386, P  0.05). As a
general tendency, the fluxes of the oxidized forms of
inorganic nitrogen were directed from the water
column to the sediment surface. Nitrite fluxes
(from -131 to 188 lmol N m-2 h-1, median
-1 lmol N m-2 h-1) comprised between 0 and
42% (average of the whole dataset 5%) of NOx
-
benthic exchanges (=NO2
-
? NO3
-
). Median values
of NOx
-
fluxes in winter and in summer were
respectively -44 lmol N m-2 h-1, range -1,616 to
608 lmol N m-2 h-1, and -68 lmol N m-2 h-1,
range -4,062 to 2,014 lmol N m-2 h-1 (Fig. 3).
NOx
-
sedimentary demand did not demonstrate a
statistically significant seasonal difference and
increased in summer relative to winter in only 14
out of 22 sampling sites (Mann–Whitney U test,
Table 3 Median and range (in parenthesis) are reported for
organic matter content (OM), bulk density (d), chlorophyll-a
concen-
trations (Chl-a) and C:N molar ratios in surface sediments (0–1
cm)
Variable Riverine connected wetlands Isolated wetlands
Winter Summer Winter Summer
OM (%) 10.4 (2.3–14.1) 10.6 (1.5–16.9) 15.9 (5.2–34.5) 17.8
(5.8–34.8)
d (g cm
-3
) 1.2 (1.0–1.5) 1.1 (1–1.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.4) 0.9 (0.9–1.2)
Chl-a (lg cm-3) 24.7 (22.9–48.9) 25.6 (14.4–32.5) 23.75 (11.8–
37.2) 23.15 (13.1–35.9)
C:N (mol:mol) 22.4 (10.7–27) 20.8 (10.9–25.7) 14.9 (10.9–21)
15.4 (11–24.8)
n = 10 for riverine connected wetlands and n = 12 for isolated
wetlands in each season
344 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
P = 0.1). Wetland type affected NOx
-
fluxes (Mann–
Whitney U test, P  0.05) (Fig. 3). Influx rates were
higher in environments connected to rivers in summer
(Mann–Whitney U test, P  0.05), but no effects of
connectivity were found in winter (Mann–Whitney U
test, P = 0.5). A positive correlation was found
between NOx
-
sedimentary demand and NO3
-
concentration (Spearman q = 0.575, P  0.001)
and between NOx
-
sedimentary demand and per-
centage of dissolved CO2 saturation in the water
column (Spearman q = 0.323, P  0.05). Results of
ammonium and NOx
-
flux measurements were
combined. No significant differences were found
between seasons or between wetland types for DIN
(NH4
?
? NOx
-
) fluxes (Fig. 3).
Denitrification rates
Nitrogen removal via denitrification was responsive to
season. Total denitrification rates (Dtot = DW ? DN)
were extremely variable and ranged between 5 and
*2,000 lmol N m-2 h-1; N2 effluxes were signifi-
cantly higher in summer than in winter (Wilcoxon T
test, P  0.01) (Fig. 4). Dtot was mostly supported by
water column nitrate (DW) and exhibited the highest
values in connected wetlands in both seasons (Mann–
Whitney U tests, P  0.001 and P  0.001 in summer
and winter, respectively). Both DW and DN were lower
in winter than in summer (Wilcoxon T tests, P  0.05).
DW ranged between 2 and 300 lmol N m
-2
h
-1
in
winter and between 3 and 1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1 in
summer supporting about 90 ± 18 and 71 ± 26% of
Dtot in the two periods, respectively. DN ranged from 0
to 67 and from 0 to 205 lmol N m-2 h-1 in winter and
summer, respectively.
Overall, denitrification activity was affected by
wetland type and correlated with several environ-
mental factors. Comparing rates among wetland
types, we found lower DW rates in isolated sites both
in winter and in summer (Mann–Whitney U tests,
P  0.01 and P  0.001, respectively). DN rates were
only significantly lower in winter (Mann–Whitney U
test, P  0.05). Dtot rates correlated positively
with NO3
-
concentrations (Spearman q = 0.748,
P  0.001), sedimentary NOx
-
demand (Spearman
q = 0.691, P  0.001), dissolved inorganic carbon
concentration (Spearman q = 0.339, P  0.05)
and sediment bulk density (Spearman q = 0.341,
P  0.05). Dtot was not correlated with sediment OM
content. Similar relationships resulted for DW,
reflecting the higher importance of this fraction on
total denitrification. DN was correlated only with
temperature (Spearman q = 0.368, P  0.05).
Increasing amounts of added
15
NO3
-
in the cores’
m
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
DIC fluxes
m
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
RQ
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
WI SI WC SC
** **
O2 fluxes
+
Fig. 2 Dark sediment oxygen demand (SOD), dissolved
inorganic carbon fluxes (DIC) and respiratory quotient (RQ)
measured at the 22 sampling sites and split up considering
winter (W) and summer (S) seasons and connected (C) and
isolated (I) wetland types. Seasonal differences (
?
P  0.05,
?? P  0.01, ??? P  0.001) were tested with the Wilcoxon
T test; hydrogeomorphic differences (* P  0.05, ** P  0.01,
*** P  0.001) were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 345
123
water phase resulted in an immediate stimulation of
denitrification rates as D15 (i.e. denitrification of
15
NO3
-
added to the water column). The increases in
rate were linear with the nitrate enrichment, both in
some isolated wetlands with low nitrate concentration
and in a nitrate-rich, connected wetland (Fig. 5).
Finally, we applied the model of Christensen
et al. (1990) using as data input NO3
-
and O2
concentration in the water (Table 2) and dark O2
fluxes measured via cores incubation. The model is
unidimensional, works in sediments that are neither
bioturbated nor colonized by phanerogams and
predicts only rates of denitrification supported by
water column nitrate (DW). Theoretical DW values
calculated for the 22 wetlands (pooled winter and
summer data) showed a very good fitting with DW
measured via the IPT (Spearman q = 0.847,
P  0.01) only in a limited range of rates
(0–140 lmol N m-2 h-1) (Fig. 6). Outputs of the
model agree well with experimental results from
wetlands characterized by low NO3
-
in the water; on
the contrary predicted rates are much higher
than those measured at sites with elevated nitrate
concentrations.
Discussion
Denitrification in shallow eutrophic wetlands
compared to other ecosystems
and methodological considerations
The removal of nitrogen in freshwater wetlands is
widely reported in the literature (Piña-Ochoa and
Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). However, compared to other
aquatic environments, few direct measurements of
denitrification rates have been performed. A summary
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
3000
WI SI WC SC
NH4
+ fluxes +
DIN fluxes
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
SCWI SI WC
NOX
- fluxes
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
WI SI
* *
NOx
- fluxes
m
o
l m
-2
h
-1
-5000
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
SC
**
WC
Fig. 3 NH4
?
(a), NOx
-
(=NO2
-
? NO3
-
) (b, c) and DIN (d)
dark fluxes measured via intact core incubations at the 22
sampling sites and split up considering winter (W) and summer
(S) seasons and connected (C) and isolated (I) wetland types.
NOx
-
fluxes are shown in two graphs with different scales.
Seasonal differences (
?
P  0.05, ?? P  0.01, ??? P  0.001)
were tested with the Wilcoxon T test; hydrogeomorphic
differences (* P  0.05, ** P  0.01, *** P  0.001) were
tested with the Mann–Whitney U test
b
346 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
of recent reports of denitrification measurements is
presented in Table 4. A direct comparison with our
data is somewhat limited by the fact that experi-
mental designs and methods are different among
the studies. Reported rates range between 1 and
3,188 lmol N m-2 h-1 and bracket our measured
averages both in isolated, 49 lmol N m-2 h-1, and in
connected, 340 lmol N m-2 h-1, wetlands (medians
30 and 286 lmol N m-2 h-1, respectively). The
range of isolated wetlands within the Po watershed
compares well with other riparian wetlands and
with some constructed wetlands (Table 4). River-
connected sites have higher rates and are within
the reported ranges for constructed wetlands in
California, Sweden and Arizona. These all receive
pulsing floods by river and hydraulic connec-
tivity may explain the higher rates in literature
(12–3,188 lmol N m-2 h-1).
The connected riverine wetlands that we studied
are among the ecosystems with highest denitrification
rates. Reported values are higher than those found in
marine environments and comparable to freshwater
ecosystems, in particular with rivers. Much lower
denitrification rates measured in isolated wetlands
are similar to those reported for marine areas
(Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006).
In the recent literature a novel microbial process,
the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium, has been
found to be responsible for a major fraction of N2
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
0
200
400
600
1700
1800
1900
2000
Dtot ++
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
0
200
400
600
1700
1800
1900
2000
DW
+
WI SI WC SC
D
N
+
**
**
***
***
*
*
(a)
(b)
(c)
***
***
***
***
Fig. 4 Rates of denitrification measured with the isotope
pairing technique at the 22 sites. Data are grouped in winter
(W) and summer (S) values of connected (C) and isolated (I)
wetland types and show total denitrification rates (Dtot, a),
denitrification of nitrate diffusing to anoxic sediments from the
water column (DW, b) and denitrification of nitrate produced
within sediments by nitrification (DN, c). Seasonal differences
(
? P  0.05, ?? P  0.01, ??? P  0.001) were tested with
the Wilcoxon T test; hydrogeomorphic differences (* P  0.05,
** P  0.01, *** P  0.001) were tested with the Mann–
Whitney U test
D
W
to
t
(1
5
D
W
+
1
4
D
W
,
µ
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
NO3
- tot (15NO3
-+14NO3
-, µM)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750
PO6
PO4
PO2
OG10
OG8
OG2
low NO3
-
high NO3
-
Fig. 5 Results from a concentration series experiment in
which increasing amounts of labelled nitrate were added to the
water phase of intact sediment cores. Sites where increasing
15
NO3
-
concentrations resulted in higher denitrification rates
are reported. Denitrification of nitrate diffusing to anoxic
sediments from the water column (DW) was generally
stimulated meaning that, at sites with low nitrate concentration
in the water column, the denitrification potential was elevated
but only partially expressed
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 347
123
flux, in particular in deep marine environments
(Thamdrup and Dalsgaard 2002). Apart from the
relevance of anammox for the nitrogen cycle, this
finding poses serious methodological concerns on the
assumptions on which the IPT is built (Risgaard-
Petersen et al. 2003; Trimmer et al. 2006). In
particular, as the relevance of anammox to N2 total
flux (ra) increases, the risk of overestimating true
denitrification rates by IPT increases (Risgaard-
Petersen et al. 2003). There are only a few papers,
mostly dealing with deep marine ecosystems, where
anammox has been measured and rates compared
with those of denitrification. The available measure-
ments performed in eutrophic brackish or freshwater
environments indicate a minor relevance of anammox
to the overall N2 fluxes, but more investigation is
needed (Trimmer et al. 2003; Schubert et al. 2006;
Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009). Using the equa-
tions reported in Risgaard-Petersen et al. (2003) and
Trimmer et al. (2006), we calculated from our
experiments the risk of overestimating denitrification
rates by combining ra and r14 (the ratio between
14
NOx
-
and
15
NOx
-
in the nitrate reduction zone).
Even if not properly designed for such calculations,
our denitrification experiment, based on increasing
additions of
15
NO3
-
to the water phase, allows such
estimates. Our results indicate that ra is low at both
connected and isolated sites and during both sampling
seasons (0–16%, median value 6%), while r14 is high
at connected sites ([3) and variable (0.1  r14  3)
at isolated sites. The combination of these percent-
ages gives a theoretical overestimation of N2 pro-
duction via denitrification between 0 and 26%
(median values of pooled data 7%). We recognize
that further experimental work should be addressed to
evaluate more accurately anammox rates and the
regulation of this process in freshwater wetlands.
Regulation of denitrification
In this study, denitrification was positively correlated
with nitrate concentration and was favored in con-
nected wetlands where we found higher concentra-
tions and availability of nitrate in both seasons (Fig. 4;
Table 2). NO3
-
concentrations in the water column of
connected sites were comparable to those in the
adjoining rivers (Mincio River, about 150 lM, and in
the Oglio River, about 400 lM), while isolated
wetlands had much lower concentrations. Rates
measured in environments hydraulically connected
to rivers were up to 1 or 2 orders of magnitude higher
than rates measured in isolated wetlands (Fig. 4).
As widely reported in the literature, water column
nitrate concentration is the main factor controlling
the kinetics of denitrification in many ecosystems
(Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006; Seitzinger
et al. 2006). As a general rule we found that DW
contributed mostly to Dtot. Nitrification in organically
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
D
W
t
h
e
o
re
tic
a
l (
µ
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
)
DW measured (µmol N m
-2 h-1) DW measured (µmol N m
-2 h-1)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
D
W
t
h
e
o
re
tic
a
l (
µ
m
o
l N
m
-2
h
-1
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140(b)(a)
Fig. 6 Denitrification rates of nitrate diffusing to anoxic
sediments from the water column (DW), calculated according to
the model
of Christensen et al. (1990), are plotted versus rates measured at
all sites (a) and at sites with low water column nitrate content
(b)
348 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
loaded wetlands was severely limited by oxygen
availability and was a minor source of NO3
-
for
coupled denitrification. The exceptions were a few
isolated environments with little to no nitrate in the
water column during summer months and with a
sufficient amount of oxygen for nitrification to
proceed. Similar trends, reported by Piña-Ochoa and
Álvarez-Cobelas (2006), confirm that water column
nitrate regulates the ratio between DW and DN.
Our experiments using a concentration series
(increasing amounts of
15
NO3
-
added in cores) dem-
onstrated that most of the sites exhibited high denitri-
fication potential (D15), and thus the process was not
saturated. This was especially true for almost all
isolated wetlands in which the in situ process was
probably nitrogen-limited by stagnant conditions and
by limited nutrient recharge from flooding by river
pulses. In connected environments with extremely high
nitrate concentration ([500 lM), we did not measure a
corresponding increase of D15, which is indicative of
substrate saturation, with only one exception (Fig. 5).
The kinetics of denitrification are more uncertain when
nitrate concentrations are saturating and other factors
can limit the reaction, e.g. availability of labile organic
carbon (Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). Also,
in those environments where nitrate concentrations did
not change significantly in the two sampling periods,
denitrification rates increased from the winter to the
summer, indicating that water temperature was an
important regulating factor. Many studies reported a
breakpoint of temperature response of denitrification
that reflects the fact that rates fall non-linearly at lower
temperatures (Focht and Verstraete 1977; Hènault and
Germon 2000).
There are several potential links between denitri-
fication and other metabolisms in sediments, includ-
ing SOD. SOD in this study was in the higher range
of rates reported in the literature for wetlands,
Table 4 Denitrification rates measured in different types of
shallow eutrophic freshwater environments, including results
from the
present study
Type of wetland Location Method for measuring
denitrification rates
Denitrification rate
(lmol N m-2 h-1)
References
Riparian wetlands New Jersey
(USA)
N2 fluxes 20–260 Seitzinger (1994)
Constructed wetlands receiving
river water
California (USA) Mass balance 12–3,188 Reilly et al. (2000)
Wetland system treating effluent
from a sewage treatment plant
Netherlands Acetylene inhibition 1–360 Toet et al. (2003)
Wastewater treatment wetland Sweden Acetylene inhibition
714–1,786 Bastviken et al. (2005)
Riparian buffer zone Estonia N2 fluxes 14–571 Teiter and
Mander (2005)
Constructed wetland Switzerland Isotope mass balance 3–661
Reinhardt et al. (2006)
Marsh receiving water from river Louisiana (USA) Isotope ratio
mass
spectrometry (IRMS)
179–679 Yu et al. (2006)
Constructed wetlands receiving
river water
Ohio (USA) Acetylene inhibition 14–129 Hernandez and Mitsch
(2007)
Constructed marsh receiving water
pumped from river
Texas (USA) N2/Ar (MIMS) 54–278 Scott et al. (2008)
Constructed wetland receiving
water from drainage ditch
Indiana (USA) Isotope pairing 40–175 Herrman and White
(2008)
(in press)
Constructed wetlands Arizona (USA) Mass balance 677–1,248
Kadlec (2008)
Constructed wetlands receiving
river water
Japan Acetylene inhibition 149–185 Zhou and Hosomi (2008)
Isolated wetlands Italy Isotope pairing 2–231 This study
Riverine connected wetlands Italy Isotope pairing 35–1,888
This study
Apart from Seitzinger (1994), reported values were calculated
from original data and expressed in lmol N m-2 h-1
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 349
123
eutrophic lakes, and rivers (Christensen et al. 1990;
Nielsen et al. 1990; Seitzinger 1994; Scott et al.
2008). Seasonal temperature was a key factor for
SOD, but unlike other reports we did not find a
significant correlation between SOD and Dtot (Sei-
tzinger 1994; Eyre and Ferguson 2002). According to
the simple but robust model proposed by Christensen
et al. (1990), denitrification can be predicted by a
combination of SOD and NO3
-
:O2 ratio. Shallow
water environments with high SOD, high nitrate
concentrations and anoxia should have a great
potential for nitrogen removal via denitrification.
The model was originally developed for Northern
European sites characterized by lower SOD and
lower NO3
-
:O2, but appears to be more generally
applicable to our systems. However, in some con-
nected wetlands where nitrate concentrations were
high, we found much higher predicted than measured
rates. This could result from saturation of denitrifi-
cation, nonlinearity of the model at extremes SOD
rates or NO3
-
:O2 ratios, occurrence of other more
favorable microbial transformation of NO3
-
as
DNRA or underestimation of real rates due to
insufficient
15
NO3
-
labeling (Brunet and Garcia-Gil
1996; Gardner and McCarthy 2009).
Denitrification rates were not correlated with the
large pool of sedimentary OM content (*10% or
more), even though this variable is widely recognized
as an important regulator of the process (Ingersoll and
Baker 1998; Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006;
Seitzinger et al. 2006). Nitrogen removal was also not
correlated with Chl-a content in sediments, even if
this represented a large pool of labile, easily degrad-
able organic carbon. Excess organic matter availabil-
ity at the study sites can mask the effect of these
factors.
Sensitivity of denitrification to nitrate concentra-
tion has significant implications to water quality and
management of wetlands. N removal appears to be
highly sensitive to both the availability of nitrate and
to temperature. The connected wetlands showed
highest denitrification rates due to regular nitrate
recharge by water bodies. The potential for increased
denitrification in isolated wetlands was demonstrated
by our series of increasing nitrate additions. If these
environments were connected and received pulsing
floods of river water, they should be able to remove
high amounts of nitrate from the water column and
serve an important role in nutrient removal.
Denitrification efficiency in shallow eutrophic
wetland sediments: N sink or sources?
Hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands influ-
ences nitrogen removal efficiency in more ways than
simply through increasing nitrate concentration.
Denitrification efficiency is evaluated as the ratio
between denitrification rates and inorganic nitrogen
effluxes across the sediment–water interface (Dtot/
(Dtot ? DIN)). It represents the percentage of the
total processed inorganic nitrogen during organic
matter decomposition released as N2 (Eyre and
Ferguson 2002). According to Eyre and Ferguson
(2002), efficiencies close to 1 mean that net loss of
nitrogen is in gaseous form from the system, while
values close to 0 mean that inorganic nitrogen ions
are recycled to the water column and may sustain
new primary production. Calculated denitrification
efficiencies for the 10 connected and 12 isolated
wetlands studied in this work are reported in Fig. 7.
In both seasons, denitrification efficiency in isolated
wetlands was below 0.2, suggesting that these
environments tended to be sources of inorganic
nitrogen with ammonification (or dissimilative reduc-
tion of nitrate to ammonium) prevailing over deni-
trification (Gardner and McCarthy 2009). Low
denitrification efficiency at isolated wetlands means
that these sites tended to maintain eutrophic–hype-
reutrophic conditions with cycling between plank-
tonic or macrophytic primary production, organic
matter settling, fast regeneration of the labile fraction
and burial of the recalcitrant litter, resulting in rapid
infilling. Benthic nitrogen cycling in these environ-
ments appears to be simplified due to negligible
nitrification/denitrification processes and limited
availability of oxidized inorganic nitrogen forms.
Connected wetlands tended to be sources of DIN to
the water column, with ratios below 0.5 in winter,
while in summer they tended to be nitrogen sinks
(denitrification efficiency median 0.65, range 0.4–
0.8). Hydraulic connectivity likely maintains oxi-
dized conditions in the water and in the upper
sediment layers and low ratios of sedimentary organic
carbon to nitrate availability, enhancing permanent N
removal.
The fraction of total NO3
-
uptake undergoing
denitrification was calculated dividing N2 production
(from DW) by NO3
-
fluxes (only negative values). At
connected sites the ratio was 0.5 and 1.0 in winter and
350 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
summer, respectively (median values). These num-
bers suggest that in winter only half of the nitrate
uptake was due to denitrification while in summer
most of the nitrate was removed via this process. At
isolated sites the calculated Dw to NO3
-
flux ratio
was 0.6 and 0.5 in winter and summer, respectively
(median values), suggesting that at both sampling
seasons other processes besides denitrification were
responsible for an important fraction of NO3
-
uptake.
Dissimilative nitrate reduction to ammonium, dark
incorporation in microphytobenthos and bacteria or
other microbially mediated or chemical processes
could be relevant processes in the studied wetlands.
Denitrification rates in freshwater wetlands could
be addressed in a mass balance context to assess the
relevance of the process at a basin scale. We
calculated the N budget according to the ‘‘Soil
System Budget’’ (Oenema et al. 2003) for the lower
Oglio River basin, where most of the studied
wetlands are located. For this 3,700 km
2
watershed
we estimated an annual nitrogen surplus of 32,633
metric ton (t) N and we calculated, assuming highest
measured denitrification rates (1,260 kg N ha
-1
-
year
-1
) and hydraulic connection for all wetlands in
the basin, a potential N removal of only
250 t N year
-1
. In fact even if maximum denitrifica-
tion rates on areal basis are about nine-folds higher
than average N surplus (143 kg N ha
-1
AL year
-1
;
AL = Agricultural Land), total riverine wetlands
area (*200 ha) is three orders of magnitude smaller
than agricultural lands (*230,000 ha) within the
catchment. According to Verhoeven et al. (2006),
wetland environments contribute significantly to
water quality improvement if they account for at
least 10% of the watershed area, while in the Oglio
basin and likely in the Po River Plain the potential of
wetlands to remove excess N is at present irrelevant
due to their overall negligible surface (�1%).
Benthic respiration and denitrification in shallow
eutrophic wetlands
This last section intends to (1) clarify the role of
denitrification in organic matter mineralization in
light of measured benthic metabolism and (2) quan-
tify the links among metabolic rates, connectivity and
N removal. The elevated rates of oxygen consump-
tion and the low oxygen reserve in the water column
measured in the shallow wetlands of the Po River
Plain are typical of environments that risk anoxia. We
calculated that in summer isolated wetlands can turn
hypoxic to anoxic in less than 10 h, mainly in the
night, without the offset of photosynthesis. The ratio
between SOD and DIC fluxes enabled us to evaluate
the importance of anaerobic metabolism. SOD,
corrected for oxygen demand due to nitrification,
was stoichiometrically comparable or significantly
below DIC fluxes. On average, about 77 and 59% of
measured DIC fluxes were uncoupled from corre-
sponding O2 uptake rates in summer and winter,
respectively. Imbalances in SOD and DIC effluxes
are typical of eutrophic to dystrophic aquatic envi-
ronments and are associated with accumulation of
reduced compounds in pore water (Ingvorsen and
Brock 1982; Capone and Kiene 1988). Denitrification
in isolated wetlands represented molar equivalents on
average 9 and 12% of SOD in winter and summer,
respectively. In connected environments, these per-
centages increased to 19 and 25%, and at some sites
the moles of N2 produced via denitrification were
winter
D
to
t/
(D
to
t+
D
IN
)
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
connected
summer
D
to
t/
(D
to
t+
D
IN
)
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
connectedisolated all sites isolated all sites
Fig. 7 Denitrification efficiencies calculated according to Eyre
and Ferguson (2002) (see the text for major details)
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 351
123
comparable to the moles of O2 respired. Oxygen
consumed via nitrification, calculated as the sum of
2DN ? 2NOx
-
efflux, was a minor fraction of SOD.
It averaged 11 and 3% of SOD in winter and summer,
respectively, and represented only 2 and 14% of SOD
for isolated and connected sites. Oxygen consump-
tion was thus mainly due to aerobic carbon miner-
alization and to the reoxidation of anaerobic
metabolism end products.
We estimated carbon oxidation by denitrification
assuming 1.25 C:1 N (mol:mol) (Richards 1965) to
evaluate the contribution of denitrification to organic
matter mineralization. Total denitrification rates were
responsible for an extremely variable production of
inorganic carbon, varying between 5 and 450 lmol
C m
-2
h
-1
in winter (average of pooled data
98 ± 23 lmol C m-2 h-1) and between 11 and
2,369 lmol C m-2 h-1 in summer (average of pooled
data 355 ± 108 lmol C m-2 h-1). Assuming that
DIC fluxes were a proxy for organic carbon mineral-
ization, we estimated that the fraction of carbon
oxidation due to denitrification ranged from 1 to
83%, with winter and summer averages of 7.7 and
13.0%, respectively. In connected sites, this fraction
was generally ecologically significant (10–83%),
while in isolated sites it was 5%. We thus demon-
strated that in riverine connected wetlands denitrifica-
tion was significant (1) for the removal of nitrogen
from NO3
-
-polluted waters and (2) as a respiratory
process responsible for a significant fraction of carbon
mineralization. Similar results were reported for
estuarine and shallow marine environments by Yoon
and Benner (1992) and Laursen and Seitzinger (2002)
and for riparian freshwater wetlands (Seitzinger 1994).
Concluding remarks
This study demonstrates that connectivity of eutrophic
wetlands with rivers is a primary factor in controlling
denitrification and nitrogen cycling. At connected
sites, denitrification can be an important pathway for
nitrogen cycling and a significant component of
benthic respiration. Here, denitrification was mostly
sustained by nitrate diffusing to anoxic sediments
from the water column, which was primarily regu-
lated by nitrate availability and temperature. Mea-
sured values were within those reported in the
literature and, for a wide range of rates (from 5 to
140 lmol N m-2 h-1), can be generally predicted by
a simple diffusion–reaction model. Denitrification
coupled to nitrification was generally low, probably
due to limited oxygen availability within sediments.
At hydrologically isolated sites, denitrification was
a negligible process with ammonium regeneration
largely prevailing over nitrate removal. This can
enhance primary productivity, infilling and, perhaps
ultimately, the shift of these temporary environments
towards more terrestrial conditions, as export of
newly formed organic matter is very low. Therefore,
the imbalance of nitrogen pathways could also
generate feedbacks with a detrimental loss of riparian
aquatic habitats which act as regulators of the whole
river ecosystem.
Pulses of nitrate immediately stimulated denitrifi-
cation meaning that all the studied environments had
a potential capacity for greater nitrogen removal. This
feature has to be taken into account as a key element
in the management of the hydrographic network of
the Po River Plain, and similar impacted rivers,
where nitrate contamination of surface and ground
waters is a critical issue. There is evidence from this
study, that actions for rehabilitating the lateral
connectivity between rivers and riverine aquatic
habitats could greatly improve nitrogen removal via
denitrification with beneficial effects on water quality
and persistence of habitats themselves.
Acknowledgements This study was supported by the
Fondazione Lombardia per l’Ambiente, by the Fili d’Acqua
Project, funded by Oglio Sud Natural Park, by the US National
Science Foundation grant DEB-0621014, through the Virginia
Coast Reserve Long-term Ecological Research program and by
the East Carolina University, Biology Department.
References
AdBPo (2001–2008) Feasibility studies of hydraulic manage-
ment for Po River basin water bodies. Po River Basin
Authority Web. http://www.adbpo.it/on-multi/ADBPO/
Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianificazione/
Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisiste
mazioneidraulica.html. Accessed 30 November 2006
Anderson LG, Hall POJ, Iverfeldt A, van der Loeff MMR,
Sundby B, Westerlund SFG (1986) Benthic respiration
measured by total carbonate production. Limnol Oceanogr
31:319–329
Arango CP, Tank JL, Johnson LT, Hamilton SK (2006)
Assimilatory uptake rather than nitrification and denitri-
fication determines nitrogen removal patterns in streams
of varying land use. Limnol Oceanogr 53:2558–2572
352 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
http://www.adbpo.it/on-
multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific
azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem
azioneidraulica.html
http://www.adbpo.it/on-
multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific
azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem
azioneidraulica.html
http://www.adbpo.it/on-
multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific
azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem
azioneidraulica.html
http://www.adbpo.it/on-
multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific
azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem
azioneidraulica.html
Bachand PAM, Horne AJ (2000) Denitrification in constructed
free-water surface wetlands: I. Very high nitrate removal
rates in a macrocosm study. Ecol Eng 14:9–15
Bartoli M, Nizzoli D, Viaroli P (2003) Microphytobenthos
activity and fluxes at the sediment–water interface:
interactions and spatial variability. Aquat Ecol 37:341–
349
Bastviken SK, Eriksson PG, Premrov A, Tonderski K (2005)
Potential denitrification in wetland sediments with dif-
ferent plant species detritus. Ecol Eng 25:183–190
Bower CE, Holm-Hansen T (1980) A salicylate-hypochlorite
method for determining ammonia in seawater. Can J Fish
Aquat Sci 37:794–798
Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Green
PA, Vörösmarty CJ (2006) Riverine nitrogen export from
the continents to the coasts. Glob Biogeochem Cycles
20:GB1S91
Brandes JA, Devol AH, Deutsch C (2007) New developments
in the marine nitrogen cycle. Chem Rev 107:577–589
Brinson MM (1993a) Changes in the functioning of wetlands
along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74
Brinson MM (1993b) A hydrogeomorphic classification for
wetlands. Technical report WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Engi-
neer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS
Brinson MM, Smith RD, Whigham DF, Lee LC, Rheinhardt
RD, Nutter WL (1998) Progress in development of the
hydrogeomorphic approach for assessing the functioning
of wetlands. Paper presented at INTECOL’s V interna-
tional wetland conference, Perth, Australia, 22–28 Sep-
tember 1998
Brunet RC, Garcia-Gil LJ (1996) Sulfide-induced dissimilatory
nitrate reduction to ammonia in anaerobic freshwater
sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 21:131–138
Burgin AJ, Hamilton SK (2007) Have we overemphasized the
role of denitrification in aquatic ecosystems? A review of
nitrate removal pathways. Front Ecol Environ 5:89–96
Capone DG, Kiene RP (1988) Comparison of microbial
dynamics in freshwater and marine environments: con-
trasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnol Oceanogr
33:725–749
Christensen PB, Nielsen LP, Sorensen J, Revsbech NP (1990)
Denitrification in nitrate-rich streams: diurnal and sea-
sonal variations related to benthic oxygen metabolism.
Limnol Oceanogr 35:640–651
Dalsgaard T, Nielsen LP, Brotas V, Viaroli P, Underwood
GJC, Nedwell DB, Sundbäck K, Rysgaard S, Miles A,
Bartoli M, Dong L, Thornton DCO, Ottosen LDM,
Castaldelli G, Risgaard-Petersen N (2000) Protocol
handbook for NICE-nitrogen cycling in estuaries: a pro-
ject under the EU research programme. Marine Science
and Technology (MAST III), National Environmental
Research Institute, Silkeborg, 62 pp
Dalsgaard T, Thamdrup B, Canfield DE (2005) Anaerobic
ammonium oxidation (anammox) in the marine environ-
ment. Res Microbiol 156:457–464
Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and con-
sequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926–929
Dilly O (2003) Regulation of the respiratory quotient of soil
microbiota by availability of nutrients. FEMS Microbiol
Ecol 43:375–381
Eyre BD, Ferguson AJP (2002) Comparison of carbon pro-
duction and decomposition, benthic nutrient fluxes and
denitrification in seagrass, phytoplankton, benthic micro-
algae and macroalgae dominated warm-temperate Aus-
tralian lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:43–59
Focht DD, Verstraete W (1977) Biochemical ecology of nitri-
fication and denitrification. Adv Microb Ecol 1:135–214
Gardner WS, McCarthy MJ (2009) Nitrogen dynamics at the
sediment–water interface in shallow, sub-tropical Florida
Bay: why denitrification efficiency may decrease with
increased eutrophication. Biogeochemistry 95:185–198
Golterman HL, Clymo RS, Ohnstand MAM (1978) Methods
for physical and chemical analysis of fresh waters. I.B.P.
Handbook Nr. 8. Blackwell, Oxford, 213 pp
Hargrave BT, Holmer M, Newcombe CP (2008) Towards a
classification of organic enrichment in marine sediments
based on biogeochemical indicators. Mar Pollut Bull
56:810–824
Hènault C, Germon JC (2000) NEMIS, a predictive model of
denitrification on the field scale. Eur J Soil Sci 51:257–270
Hernandez ME, Mitsch WJ (2007) Denitrification in created
riverine wetlands: influence of hydrology and season.
Ecol Eng 30:78–88
Herrman KS, White JR (2008) Denitrification in intact sedi-
ment cores from a constructed wetland: examining the
isotope pairing technique. Appl Geochem. doi:0.1016/j.
apgeochem.2008.04.024
Ingersoll TL, Baker LA (1998) Nitrate removal in wetland
microcosms. Water Res 32:677–684
Ingvorsen K, Brock TD (1982) Electron flow via sulphate
reduction and methanogenesis in the anaerobic hypolim-
nion of Lake Mendota. Limnol Oceanogr 27:559–564
Jetten MSM (2008) The microbial nitrogen cycle. Environ
Microbiol 10:2903–2909
Kadlec RH (2008) The effects of wetland vegetation and
morphology on nitrogen processing. Ecol Eng 33:126–141
Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press,
Boca Raton
Koop-Jakobsen K, Giblin AE (2009) Anammox in tidal marsh
sediments: the role of salinity, nitrogen loading, and
marsh vegetation. Estuar Coasts 32:238–245
Laursen AE, Seitzinger SP (2002) The role of denitrification in
nitrogen removal and carbon mineralization in Mid-
Atlantic Bight sediments. Cont Shelf Res 22:1397–1416
Lin JF (2006) A regional guidebook for applying the hydrog-
eomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of de-
pressional wetlands in the Upper Des Plaines River Basin.
Final report ERDC/EL TR-06-4, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, pp 18–22
Lorenzen CJ (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and phaeo-
pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol Ocea-
nogr 12:343–346
Marchetti R (1993) Problematiche ecologiche del sistema idrog-
rafico padano. Quadro di sintesi. Acqua Aria 7:775–789
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (eds) (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn.
Wiley, New York
Nielsen LP (1992) Denitrification in sediment determined from
nitrogen isotope pairing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86:357–362
Nielsen LP, Christensen PB, Revsbech NP, Sørensen J (1990)
Denitrification and photosynthesis in stream sediment
Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 353
123
http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.024
http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.024
studied with microsensor and whole-core techniques.
Limnol Oceanogr 35:1135–1144
Nixon SW (1995) Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition,
social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41:199–219
Oenema O, Kros H, De Vries W (2003) Approaches and
uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient
management and environmental policies. Eur J Agron 20:
3–16
Piña-Ochoa E, Álvarez-Cobelas M (2006) Denitrification in
aquatic environments: a cross-system analysis. Biogeo-
chemistry 81:111–130
Provini A, Binelli AP (2006) Environmental quality of the Po
River delta. In: Wangersky PJ (ed) Estuaries. Springer,
Berlin, pp 175–195
Reilly JF, Horne AJ, Miller CD (2000) Nitrate removal from a
drinking water supply with large free-surface constructed
wetlands prior to groundwater recharge. Ecol Eng 14:
33–47
Reinhardt M, Müller B, Gächter R, Wehrli B (2006) Nitrogen
removal in a small constructed wetland: an isotope mass
balance approach. Environ Sci Technol 40:3313–3319
Richards FA (1965) Anoxic basins and fjords. In: Ryley JP,
Skirrow G (eds) Chemical oceanography. Academic
Press, London, pp 611–645
Risgaard-Petersen N (2004) Denitrification. In: Nielsen S,
Banta G, Pedersen M (eds) Estuarine nutrient cycling: the
influence of primary producers. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp
263–280
Risgaard-Petersen N, Rysgaard S (1995) Nitrate reduction in
sediments and waterlogged soil measured by 15 N tech-
niques. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied
soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press,
London, pp 287–310
Risgaard-Petersen N, Nielsen LP, Rysgaard S, Dalsgaard T,
Meyer RL (2003) Application of the isotope pairing
technique in sediments where anammox and denitrifica-
tion coexist. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 1:63–73
Schaller JL, Royer TV, David MB, Tank JL (2004) Denitrifi-
cation associated with plants and sediments in an agri-
cultural stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:667–676
Schubert CJ, Durisch-Kaiser E, Wehrli B, Thamdrup B, Lam P,
Kuypers MMM (2006) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in
a tropical freshwater system (Lake Tanganyika). Environ
Microbiol. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001074.x
Scott TJ, McCarthy MJ, Gardner WS, Doyle RD (2008)
Denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammo-
nium, and nitrogen fixation along a nitrate concentration
gradient in a created freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry
87:99–111
Seitzinger SP (1994) Linkages between organic matter min-
eralization and denitrification in eight riparian wetlands.
Biogeochemistry 25:19–39
Seitzinger S, Harrison JA, Bohlke JK, Bouwman AF, Low-
rance R, Peterson B, Tobias C, van Drecht G (2006)
Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a
synthesis. Ecol Appl 16:2064–2090
Simpson MR (2002) A proposed classification of European
wetlands: development and testing. PhD dissertation,
University of London
Sirivedhin T, Gray KA (2006) Factors affecting denitrification
rates in experimental wetlands: field and laboratory
studies. Ecol Eng 26:167–181
Smith VH, Joye SB, Howarth RW (2006) Eutrophication of
freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr
51:351–355
Strickland JD, Parsons TR (1972) A practical handbook of
seawater analysis, vol 167, 2nd edn. Bulletin of Fisheries
Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, pp 207–211
Sundbäck K, Miles A, Göransson E (2000) Nitrogen fluxes,
denitrification and the role of microphytobenthos in mi-
crotidal shallow-water sediments: an annual study. Mar
Ecol Prog Ser 200:59–76
Teiter S, Mander U (2005) Emission of N2O, N2, CH4, and
CO2 from constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment
and from riparian buffer zones. Ecol Eng 25:528–541
Thamdrup B, Dalsgaard T (2002) Production of N2 through
anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to nitrate reduc-
tion in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:
1312–1318
Tiedje JM (1988) Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory
nitrate reduction to ammonium. In: Zehnder AJB (ed)
Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York
Toet S, Huibers LHFA, Richard SP, Verhoeven JTA (2003)
Denitrification in the periphyton associated with plant
shoots and in the sediment of a wetland system supplied
with sewage treatment plant effluent. Hydrobiologia
501:29–44
Trimmer M, Nicholls JC, Deflandre B (2003) Anaerobic
ammonium oxidation measured in sediments along the
Thames Estuary, United Kingdom. Appl Environ Micro-
biol 69:6447–6454
Trimmer M, Risgaard-Petersen N, Nicholls JC, Engstrom P
(2006) Direct measurements of anaerobic ammonium
oxidation (anammox) and denitrification in intact sedi-
ment cores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 326:37–47
Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting MM (2006)
Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water
quality. Trends Ecol Evol 21:96–103
Yoon WB, Benner R (1992) Denitrification and oxygen con-
sumption in sediments of two south Texas estuaries. Mar
Ecol Prog Ser 90:157–167
Yu K, DeLaune RD, Boeckx P (2006) Direct measurement of
denitrification activity in a Gulf coast freshwater marsh
receiving diverted Mississippi River water. Chemosphere
65:2449–2455
Zhou S, Hosomi M (2008) Nitrogen transformations and bal-
ance in a constructed wetland for nutrient-polluted river
water treatment using forage rice in Japan. Ecol Eng
32:147–155
354 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354
123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001074.x
Copyright of Biogeochemistry is the property of Springer
Science & Business Media B.V. and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.
The influence of watershed characteristics on nitrogen
export to and marine fate in Hood Canal, Washington, USA
Peter D. Steinberg • Michael T. Brett •
J. Scott Bechtold • Jeffrey E. Richey •
Lauren M. Porensky • Suzanne N. Smith
Received: 15 April 2009 / Accepted: 23 August 2010 /
Published online: 21 October 2010
� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
Abstract Hood Canal, Washington, USA, is a poorly
ventilated fjord-like sub-basin of Puget Sound that
commonly experiences hypoxia. This study examined
the influence of watershed soils, vegetation, physical
features, and population density on nitrogen (N) export
to Hood Canal from 43 tributaries. We also linked our
watershed study to the estuary using a salinity mass
balance model that calculated the relative magnitude of
N loading to Hood Canal from watershed, direct
precipitation, and marine sources. The overall flow-
weighted total dissolved N (TDN) and particulate N
input concentrations to Hood Canal were 152 and
49 lg l-1, respectively. Nitrate and dissolved organic
N comprised 64 and 29% of TDN, respectively.
The optimal regression models for TDN concentration
and areal yield included a land cover term suggesting an
effect of N-fixing red alder (Alnus rubra) and a human
population density term (suggesting onsite septic
system (OSS) discharges). There was pronounced
seasonality in stream water TDN concentrations,
particularly for catchments with a high prevalence of
red alder, with the lowest concentrations occurring in
the summer and the highest occurring in November–
December. Due to strong seasonality in TDN concen-
trations and in particular stream flow, over 60% of the
TDN export from this watershed occurred during the
3 month period of November–January. Entrainment of
marine water into the surface layer of Hood Canal
accounted for &98% of N loading to the euphotic zone
of this estuary, and in a worst case scenario OSS N
inputs contribute &0.5% of total N loading. Domestic
wastewater discharges and red alders appear to be a
very important N source for many streams, but a minor
nutrient source for the estuary as a whole.
Keywords Hood Canal � Puget Sound �
Stream chemistry � Nitrogen � Red alder �
Onsite septic systems � Eutrophication � Hypoxia
Introduction
Since the Industrial Revolution, human activities
have doubled the loading of mineralized nitrogen (N)
to terrestrial ecosystems (Vitousek et al. 1997;
P. D. Steinberg � M. T. Brett (&) � S. N. Smith
Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Washington, Box 352700,
Seattle, WA 98195-2700, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
J. S. Bechtold
School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences,
University of Washington, Box 355020,
Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA
J. E. Richey � L. M. Porensky
School of Oceanography, University of Washington,
Box 355351, Seattle, WA 98195-7940, USA
P. D. Steinberg (&)
GoldSim Technology Group, 300 NE Gilman Blvd,
Suite 100, Issaquah, WA 98027-2941, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433
DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9521-7
Green et al. 2004). On a global scale the most
significant anthropogenic inputs to the reactive N
cycle include fertilizers, wastewater discharges, urban/
suburban runoff, and NOx and NH3 loading to the
atmospheric from fossil fuel combustion and agricul-
ture (Vitousek et al. 1997; Paerl et al. 2002; Galloway
et al. 2004). Excessive terrestrial N loading can lead to
soil N saturation, decreased tree productivity,
enhanced N leaching into surface and groundwaters
(Fenn et al. 1998), and in some cases dramatically
increased loading to receiving lakes, rivers and estu-
aries (Howarth et al. 1996; Boyer et al. 2006).
Intact conifer-dominated watersheds are usually N
limited (Sollins et al. 1980; Triska et al. 1984; Hedin
et al. 1995), discharge proportionally more dissolved
organic than inorganic N (Perakis and Hedin 2002),
and have low areal N yields (Perakis and Hedin 2002;
Cairns and Lajtha 2005). Areas subjected to timber
harvest and other disturbances are often re-colonized
by early successional nitrogen-fixing species such as
alder (Alnus spp.). Red alder (Alnus rubra), a prevalent
deciduous tree in the Pacific northwest region of North
America, can fix 100–200 kg N ha
-1
year
-1
(Binkley
et al. 1994). Since alders often grow in riparian areas
adjacent to surface and subsurface flow paths, high soil
and litterfall N concentrations can lead to increased
stream water N concentrations (Hurd et al. 2001;
Compton et al. 2003; Hurd and Raynal 2004).
Increased stream water N yields due to alders have
been noted in the coastal range of Oregon (Compton
et al. 2003), the Olympic Peninsula in Washington
(Bechtold et al. 2003), the Adirondack Mountains in
New York (Hurd et al. 2001; Hurd and Raynal 2004),
forests of Wisconsin (Younger and Kapustka 1983),
and fens in Germany (Busse and Gunkel 2002).
Our study was initiated as part of a broader effort
to understand hypoxic events and associated fish-kills
in Hood Canal. Hood Canal is an N-limited, deep,
stratified fjord-like sub-basin of the Puget Sound
estuary with a shallow sill blocking deep-water tidal
exchange at its marine boundary (Newton et al.
1995). Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in
the deep waters of Hood Canal decline during the
summer due to strong density stratification and
the settling/decomposition of phytoplankton from
the euphotic zone, and low summer/fall DO concen-
trations have been observed since the 1950s (Collias
et al. 1974). Nearly all of the lower reaches of the
Hood Canal watershed have been logged or cleared at
least once, and are dominated by red alders. Further-
more, while population density in the Hood Canal
watershed is quite low, i.e., 20 individuals km-2,
much of the population is concentrated along the
shorelines, and all domestic wastewater discharges
within the watershed are treated by on-site septic
(OSS) systems.
The overall objectives of our study were to
determine the loading of dissolved nitrogen by source
into Hood Canal, and to assess that loading relative to
marine sources. We examined the extent to which
watershed characteristics (e.g., soils, land cover,
physical features and population density) predict
stream water N concentrations and nutrient export to
Hood Canal from its tributaries. We then linked the
watershed to the Canal, using a salinity mass balance
to estimate marine upwelling flows, and assessed the
magnitudes of watershed N export to the surface
mixed layer of Hood Canal relative to marine sources
(i.e., estuarine circulation).
Study area
The Hood Canal (Fig. 1) watershed has a surface area
of *3,050 km2, of which Hood Canal itself comprises
12%. The watershed can be separated into three zones:
(1) the large snowmelt dominated catchments of the
Olympic Mountains, (2) the Skokomish River, and (3)
the many smaller rain dominated catchments of the
Kitsap Peninsula and Hood Canal lowlands. Dominant
land uses/covers in the lowland catchments are
re-growth conifer, deciduous mixed forests, and sub-
urban and semi-rural development (Table 1). Areas
mapped as deciduous mixed forest usually have a
closed upper canopy that is composed of ca. 50% red
alder (L. Porensky, unpubl. data). The upper elevations
are within the Olympic National Park and are nearly
pristine conifer forests. The middle elevations are part
of Olympic National Forest, 76% of which has been
logged (Peterson et al. 1997).
The lowland catchments have more disturbance
from forest clearing, wetland draining and suburban
development. In this watershed, over 60% of precip-
itation occurs between November and January and less
than 10% occurs between June and August. Freshwater
inputs to Hood Canal averaged 170 m
3
s
-1
during the
water years 1990 to 2006. The first study year (i.e.,
2005) was somewhat drier than average, whereas 2005
416 Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433
123
Fig. 1 Map showing the
location of the 43 sampled
tributaries in the Hood
Canal watershed,
Washington
Table 1 Physical characteristics, and land cover and soil types
for the five regions of the Hood Canal watershed
Skokomish
River
a
Diversion from
North Fork
Skokomish
Other Olympic
Mountain
catchments
Sampled
Kitsap/lowland
catchments
Unsampled
Kitsap/lowland
catchments
Physical characteristics
Catchment area (km
2
) 375 254 985 578 618
Mean elevation (m) 428 808 543 186 118
Average slope (%) 40.2 52.9 44.0 14.8 17.1
Average discharge (1990–2006) (m
3
s
-1
) 37.6 21.9 69.5 19.6 20.7
Average runoff (1990–2006) (m year
-1
) 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.1
Population density (people km
-2
) 3.6 3.8 3.8 20 45
Land cover
Mature coniferous forest (%) 46.4 58.3 49.9 41.3 23.7
Deciduous mixed forest (%) 8.8 3.8 7.3 16.9 29.3
Grass/shrubs/crops/early regrowth (%) 8.6 5.3 7.6 8.1 9.4
Young coniferous forest (%) 9.7 3.6 7.9 13.3 15.1
Low and high density urban (%) 1.4 0.9 1.3 2.2 4.6
Soil types
Entisols (weakly developed soils)
not derived from till
41.3 64.5 45.3 38.3 51.0
Soils influenced by ash (andic soils
and andisols)
56.2 45.4 53.0 6.5 15.1
Soils derived from glacial till 13.8 12.5 13.4 49.5 29.7
Rock outcrops 6.4 14.4 8.8 0.1 0.0
a
Skokomish River does not include that area of the North Fork
Skokomish River upstream of upstream of Cushman Dam
Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433 417
123
was the wettest year in the last 50. Average annual
runoff ranges from 3.2 m year
-1
in the Skokomish
River catchment to 1.1 m year
-1
in the lowlands
(Table 1). The mountainous areas of the watershed are
sparsely populated (i.e., &4 people km-2), and the
lowlands have moderate population densities
(&20 people km-2) with areas of higher population
density along the shoreline especially within Lynch
Cove (Table 1).
Methods
Basin attributes
A USGS 30 m resolution digital elevation model
(DEM) was used to create the stream network,
delineate catchment boundaries, and calculate
watershed areas, mean elevation and slope. Soils
data (SSURGO 2006) were used to construct a soil
matrix of chemical and physical characteristics and
taxonomic information for each soil type. Land
cover was classified, via a supervised classification
of a 30 m resolution Landsat Enhanced Thematic
Mapper Plus (ETM?) image from July 30, 2000
(NASA Landsat Program 2001), with at least 10
ground-truth reference sites used for each the land
cover type. Urban areas were masked based on their
location in the PRISM 2002 landcover map (Alberti
et al. 2004), and subalpine forests were masked
based on their proximity to snow-covered areas. To
estimate this land cover classification’s accuracy,
100 randomly located test points were referenced
against aerial photographs from 2003, which sug-
gested that the final product had a classification
accuracy of [90%.
Population estimates for each catchment were
generated by disaggregating 2000 US Census block
data using normalized difference vegetation index
(NDVI) scores (sensu Imhoff et al. 2000; Koh et al.
2006), derived from the previously mentioned Land-
sat image. The PRISM 2002 land cover classification
was used to subdivide the original NDVI raster into
three component rasters, including areas expected to
have zero population (e.g., steep slopes), suburban
areas (with 90% of the population) and rural areas
(with 10% of the population). Within the suburban
and rural rasters, the population for each census block
was divided among individual pixels based on the
difference between each pixel’s NDVI value and the
mean NDVI value of the census block.
Field and laboratory procedures
Forty-three streams, accounting for 88% of the overall
watershed’s hydrologic yield, were sampled monthly
from January 2005 to December 2006. The unsampled
areas of the watershed (which accounted for 22% of the
surface area and 12% of the hydrologic yield) consisted
of small, undifferentiated shoreline catchments. Grab
samples were collected in 0.1 M HCl acid-washed
bottles pre-rinsed with streamwater. Dissolved nutrient
samples (NO3
-
, NH4
?
) were filtered through What-
man
�
cellulose acetate filters (0.45 lm pore size), and
analyzed on an Alpkem RFA/2 autoanalyzer. TDN was
measured on a Shimadzu DOC analyzer after filtering
through pre-combusted Whatman
�
GF/F glass fiber
filters (0.7 lm). For particulates, 100–600 ml of
stream water, depending on turbidity, was filtered
through GF/F filters. Particulates captured on the filters
were dried at 55�C for 24 h, acid-fumigated for 24 h,
re-dried at 55�C, and packed in tin capsules. The
samples were analyzed for N and C concentration at the
UC-Davis Stable Isotope Facility using a PDZEuropa
ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer.
Streamflow estimation
Fourteen of the 43 streams, which accounted for 68%
of the total watershed area, including all large Olympic
Mountain rivers, had daily mean flow records. The
ungaged areas were narrow shoreline catchments and
small to medium size tributaries entirely within the
lowlands. Streamflows for the ungaged catchments
were estimated by classifying each drainage by hydro-
climatic region and then applying the mean of the areal
daily runoff rates for a particular region.
Loading rates
Monthly freshwater dissolved nutrient loads to Hood
Canal were estimated by multiplying the monthly
mean streamflows by the actual monthly grab sample
concentrations for the 39 sampling sites that were
direct discharges (i.e., not upstream of other sample
locations) to Hood Canal accordingly: Loading =
P
monthly conc. 9 mean monthly flow 9 30.4.
The flow-weighted mean concentrations were used
418 Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433
123
as the response variable in regression models, these
were calculated accordingly; flow-weighted concen-
tration =
P
monthly conc. 9 mean monthly flow/
P
mean monthly flow.
To fill-in missing data we used the three streams
which had the most similar monthly patterns com-
pared to the stream with the missing data to generate
regression based estimates for the missing value and
we then took the average of these estimates to
represent the missing data. Before the fill-in process,
the 24-month by 43-stream dissolved constituent
concentration matrices were 78% complete. The
monthly arithmetic mean of concentrations measured
in the four most populated Kitsap watersheds (Big
Beef, Seabeck, Tahuya, and Union) were used to
estimate each month’s concentration for the unsam-
pled portions of the Hood Canal watershed. These
streams had average population densities (49 peo-
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx
Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx

More Related Content

Similar to Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx

Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...
Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...
Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...Javier Quesada Duque
 
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...Adi Levi
 
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetland
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetlandSurface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetland
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetlandAlexander Decker
 
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...IJRTEMJOURNAL
 
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...journal ijrtem
 
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.Alexander Decker
 
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs
 
Wetland as carbon Sink
Wetland as carbon SinkWetland as carbon Sink
Wetland as carbon SinkShourabh Singh
 
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be0000000c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000Thomas Saunders
 
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basins
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River BasinsA Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basins
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basinsijtsrd
 
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...Marco Pesce
 
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...Alexander Decker
 
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptx
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptxnamitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptx
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptxKundanPrasad28
 
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...INFOGAIN PUBLICATION
 
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Alexander Decker
 
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Alexander Decker
 

Similar to Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx (20)

Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...
Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...
Spatial distribution and environmental geochemistry of zinc metal in water an...
 
chun2009.pdf
chun2009.pdfchun2009.pdf
chun2009.pdf
 
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...
springtime contribution of dinitrogen fixation to primary production across t...
 
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetland
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetlandSurface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetland
Surface and ground water pollution in abata ogun agricultural wetland
 
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
 
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
Assessment of the Water Quality of Lake Sidi Boughaba (Ramsar Site 1980) Keni...
 
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.
Concentration of metal pollutants in river kubanni, zaria, nigeria.
 
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...
Interrelationship between nutrients and chlorophyll-a in an urban stormwater ...
 
September 1 - 0830 - Zouheir Massri
September 1 - 0830 - Zouheir MassriSeptember 1 - 0830 - Zouheir Massri
September 1 - 0830 - Zouheir Massri
 
Wetland as carbon Sink
Wetland as carbon SinkWetland as carbon Sink
Wetland as carbon Sink
 
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be0000000c9605211e66c2f5be000000
0c9605211e66c2f5be000000
 
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basins
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River BasinsA Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basins
A Review on the Sedimentation Problem in River Basins
 
Sample_MRSchiller
Sample_MRSchillerSample_MRSchiller
Sample_MRSchiller
 
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...
Modelling climate change impacts on nutrients and primary production in coast...
 
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...
Gamma ray assessment of subsurface water rock interaction in abuja from geolo...
 
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptx
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptxnamitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptx
namitha-150510093646-lva1-app6892-converted.pptx
 
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...
Distribution and mobility of lead and zinc atmospheric depositions in industr...
 
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
 
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
Seasonal variations in heavy metal status of the calabar river, cross river s...
 
Althouse et al. 2014
Althouse et al. 2014Althouse et al. 2014
Althouse et al. 2014
 

More from jaggernaoma

Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docx
Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docxAttached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docx
Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docx
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docxAttached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docx
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docx
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docxAttached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docx
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docx
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docxAttached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docx
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docx
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docxAttached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docx
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached Files  SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docx
Attached Files     SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docxAttached Files     SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docx
Attached Files  SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docx
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docxAttached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docx
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docx
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docxAttached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docx
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docx
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docxAttached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docx
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docx
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docxAttached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docx
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docx
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docxAttached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docx
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docx
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docxAttached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docx
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docx
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docxAttached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docx
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docx
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docxAttached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docx
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docxjaggernaoma
 
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docx
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docxattached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docx
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docx
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docxAttach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docx
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docxjaggernaoma
 
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docx
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docxAttach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docx
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docxjaggernaoma
 
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docx
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docxAtomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docx
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docxjaggernaoma
 
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docx
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docxAtomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docx
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docxjaggernaoma
 
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docx
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docxAtoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docx
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docxjaggernaoma
 

More from jaggernaoma (20)

Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docx
Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docxAttached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docx
Attached is a joint letter to Capitol Hill to advocate for increased.docx
 
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docx
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docxAttached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docx
Attached is a copy of an interview done with a Tribal member regardi.docx
 
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docx
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docxAttached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docx
Attached Files Week 5 - trace IP Physical Location.rtf (38..docx
 
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docx
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docxAttached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docx
Attached here is a psychology article I need to be summarized. Pleas.docx
 
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docx
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docxAttached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docx
Attached Files News Analysis Sample.docxNews Analysis Sam.docx
 
Attached Files  SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docx
Attached Files     SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docxAttached Files     SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docx
Attached Files  SOC-220_SOCIAL PROBLEMS PRESENTATION.docx
 
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docx
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docxAttached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docx
Attached below you will find the series of 4 questions. This assignm.docx
 
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docx
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docxAttached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docx
Attached below isWEEK 4 As always, include references. As alwa.docx
 
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docx
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docxAttached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docx
Attached are two articles in one document. Write thoughtful resp.docx
 
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docx
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docxAttached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docx
Attached are the instructions to the assignment.Written Assign.docx
 
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docx
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docxAttached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docx
Attached are the instructions and rubric! Research Paper #2.docx
 
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docx
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docxAttached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docx
Attached are the guidelines for the Expertise Sharing Project. M.docx
 
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docx
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docxAttached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docx
Attached are the documents needed to complete the assignment. The in.docx
 
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docx
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docxAttached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docx
Attached are the 3 documents1. Draft copy submitted2. Sam.docx
 
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docx
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docxattached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docx
attached are directions needed to complete this essay! Please make s.docx
 
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docx
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docxAttach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docx
Attach is the checklist For this Assignment, write a 3 and half pa.docx
 
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docx
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docxAttach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docx
Attach and submit the final draft of your Narrative Essay. Remember .docx
 
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docx
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docxAtomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docx
Atomic Theory Scientists and Their ContributionsScientist .docx
 
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docx
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docxAtomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docx
Atomic models are useful because they allow us to picture what is in.docx
 
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docx
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docxAtoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docx
Atoms and Electrons AssignmentLook at these websites to he.docx
 

Recently uploaded

History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxHistory Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxsocialsciencegdgrohi
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupJonathanParaisoCruz
 
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfPharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfMahmoud M. Sallam
 
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfadityarao40181
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceSamikshaHamane
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxHistory Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
 
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfPharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
 
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 

Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlandso.docx

  • 1. Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands on nitrogen removal via denitrification E. Racchetti • Marco Bartoli • E. Soana • D. Longhi • R. R. Christian • M. Pinardi • P. Viaroli Received: 30 April 2009 / Accepted: 25 May 2010 / Published online: 17 June 2010 � Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Wetland ecosystems in agricultural areas often become progressively more isolated from main water bodies. Stagnation favors the accumulation of organic matter as the supply of electron acceptors with water renewal is limited. In this context it is expected that nitrogen recycling prevails over nitro- gen dissipation. To test this hypothesis, denitrifica- tion rates, fluxes of dissolved oxygen (SOD), inorganic carbon (DIC) and nitrogen and sediment
  • 2. features were measured in winter and summer 2007 on 22 shallow riverine wetlands in the Po River Plain (Northern Italy). Fluxes were determined from incu- bations of intact cores by measurement of concen- tration changes or isotope pairing in the case of denitrification. Sampled sites were eutrophic to hypertrophic; 10 were connected and 12 were isolated from the adjacent rivers, resulting in large differences in nitrate concentrations in the water column (from 5 to 1,133 lM). Benthic metabolism and denitrification rates were investigated by two overarching factors: season and hydrological connectivity. SOD and DIC fluxes resulted in respi- ratory quotients greater than one at most sampling sites. Sediment respiration was coupled to both ammonium efflux, which increased from winter to summer, and nitrate consumption, with higher rates in river-connected wetlands. Denitrification rates measured in river-connected wetlands (35–
  • 3. 1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1) were up to two orders of magnitude higher than rates measured in isolated wetlands (2–231 lmol N m-2 h-1), suggesting a strong regulation of the process by nitrate availabil- ity. These rates were also significantly higher in summer (9–1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1) than in winter (2–365 lmol N m-2 h-1). Denitrification supported by water column nitrate (DW) accounted for 60– 100% of total denitrification (Dtot); denitrification coupled to nitrification (DN) was probably controlled by limited oxygen availability within sediments. Denitrification efficiency, calculated as the ratio between N removal via denitrification and N regen- eration, and the relative role of denitrification for organic matter oxidation, were high in connected wetlands but not in isolated sites. This study confirms the importance of restoring hydraulic connectivity of riverine wetlands for the maintenance of important biogeochemical functions such as nitrogen removal via denitrification.
  • 4. Keywords Denitrification � Benthic respiration � N-regeneration � Hydrological connectivity � Riverine wetlands E. Racchetti � M. Bartoli (&) � E. Soana � D. Longhi � M. Pinardi � P. Viaroli Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Parma, Viale G.P. Usberti 33/A, 43100 Parma, Italy e-mail: [email protected] R. R. Christian Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA 123 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9477-7 Introduction Coastal eutrophication and dystrophy have become common globally as nutrient inputs from rivers, particularly nitrogen loads, result in profound modi- fication of coastal biogeochemistry (Nixon 1995;
  • 5. Smith et al. 2006; Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Thus, both the scientific and environmental management communities interested in nutrient loadings have increased focus on those inland areas where nutrients are generated and on nutrient transport and transfor- mations in freshwater bodies (Schaller et al. 2004; Arango et al. 2006; Boyer et al. 2006). In northern Italy nitrate contamination of surface and groundwater is particularly relevant in the Po River Plain, and the potential for removal of nitrogen has significant consequences to eutrophication of receiving coastal ecosystems. The Po River is one of the most significant freshwater source to the Mediterranean basin and affects the trophic state of the shallow northern Adriatic Sea (Provini and Binelli 2006). Nitrogen transformations result from different bio- geochemical processes including biological uptake, abiotic sedimentation, nitrification, ammonification,
  • 6. nitrate reduction to ammonium, denitrification and anammox, the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium (Brandes et al. 2007; Burgin and Hamilton 2007; Jetten 2008). Among these, microbially mediated denitrification and anammox are the only processes that remove inorganic nitrogen from land and water and displace it into the atmosphere (Schubert et al. 2006; Seitzinger et al. 2006). Studies reporting simul- taneous measurements of denitrification and anammox in eutrophic freshwater environments are very limited but indicate that the contribution of denitrification to N2 fluxes is generally [90% (Trimmer et al. 2003; Schubert et al. 2006; Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009). Among freshwater and marine ecosystems, the most efficient nitrate removal has been measured in wet- lands, largely due to the anoxic and organic wetland sediments (Bachand and Horne 2000). But not all wetlands function similarly (Brinson 1993a, b; Brin- son et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosselink 2000; Lin 2006),
  • 7. and there is a need to determine how different classes of wetlands contribute to nitrogen transformations and removal. Hydrogeomorphic conditions of wetlands affect the physicochemical characteristics of water and sediments which in turn regulate denitrification and nitrogen removal. Hydrology, climate and basin geomorphology are main components that determine establishment and maintenance of a wetland’s hydrogeomorphology (Brinson 1993a, b; Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Among hydrogeomorphic condi- tions, hydrological connectivity is relevant in those heavily exploited geographical areas where (1) the control of water flow in rivers impedes flooding and lateral interaction with riparian areas and (2) land use by agriculture has turned wetlands into isolated patches. In waterlogged soils, nitrate availability, autochthonous organic matter and anaerobic condi-
  • 8. tions are essential factors for the denitrification process, but they are not sufficient to establish a significant nitrogen removal efficiency. Morphology and topographic position in the landscape, together with the distribution of water sources (groundwater, surface inflow or precipitation), turnover time and hydrodynamics influence the degree to which chem- icals are transported to or from wetlands (Brinson 1993a, b; Brinson et al. 1998). Understanding how denitrification is regulated in wetlands is a difficult target as environmental features often interact dynamically, making it diffi- cult to identify a prevailing factor, if indeed one exists. Nitrate is supplied to sediments from nitrifi- cation or by diffusion from the water column and its concentration is in general positively correlated with denitrification rates (Reinhardt et al. 2006; Sirived- hin and Gray 2006). In anaerobic wetland sediments,
  • 9. coupled nitrification–denitrification is limited, so the anaerobic respiration may be supported by external nitrate input—e.g. by agricultural runoff or previ- ously nitrified sewage effluent (Verhoeven et al. 2006). Nitrate advected through the sediment from groundwater is potentially an important source, especially in areas with contaminated aquifers (Sei- tzinger et al. 2006). Co-occurring processes often make it difficult to separate the effect of temperature on denitrification rates alone. Increasing tempera- tures stimulate ammonification, nitrification and benthic respiration that could promote denitrification process (Bachand and Horne 2000; Sirivedhin and Gray 2006; Hernandez and Mitsch 2007). Simulta- neously, at elevated temperatures, low oxygen solubility and high rates of aerobic respiration result in oxygen deficits and enhanced anaerobic mineral- ization processes, such as sulfate reduction, that
  • 10. may inhibit denitrification and favor DNRA, the 336 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 dissimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonium (Brunet and Garcia-Gil 1996; Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). Increasing temperatures enhance also macrophytic or microphytobenthic N uptake, a process that competes with nitrification and denitrification (Sundbäck et al. 2000; Bartoli et al. 2003; Risgaard-Petersen 2004). Nitrate removal in wetlands is also regulated by the availability of organic matter and its macromolecular quality (Bastviken et al. 2005; Sirivedhin and Gray 2006). Further, nitrate removal efficiency is inversely correlated with the ratio between litter C and NO3 -
  • 11. concentration in the water column, while other pathways, such as DNRA, are favored (Tiedje 1988; Ingersoll and Baker 1998; Gardner and McCarthy 2009). Water pH is rarely examined as it is usually not perceived as detrimental to denitri- fying metabolism (Kadlec and Knight 1996). The overall aim of this study was to evaluate the factors regulating denitrification and assess the importance of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands on nitrogen removal efficiency. We hypoth- esize that wetlands with limited hydrological con- nectivity with adjacent rivers are characterized by low nitrogen removal via denitrification. We mea- sured nitrate removal via denitrification in conjunc- tion with benthic respiration, inorganic nitrogen exchange and, potentially regulating, environmental factors. Denitrification was measured consistently by the isotope pairing technique (IPT) in a number
  • 12. of shallow riverine wetlands located in the Po River Plain (Northern Italy). The wetlands were characterized by degree of connectivity with the adjacent water bodies (the Po, the Oglio and the Mincio Rivers). To our knowledge, no studies have reported denitrification and benthic flux measure- ments in shallow freshwater wetlands of the Po Plain, despite their recognized importance as nitrogen receivers and transformers. This study represents one of the most spatially extensive investigation of nitrogen cycling within the wetlands of a large watershed using the same methodological approach. Materials and methods Study area All 22 sites from this study are small-sized and shallow aquatic wetlands located in the Po River Plain, within the basins of the Po, Oglio and Mincio Rivers, in the provinces of Cremona and Mantova,
  • 13. Northern Italy (Fig. 1; Table 1). The Po River Plain is characterised by intensive agricultural practices, live- stock farming and breeding (Marchetti 1993). The studied wetlands are eutrophic to hypertrophic and are undergoing rapid infilling; most of them are included in the Oglio Nord, Oglio Sud, and Mincio Natural Parks. We sampled seven oxbow lakes or old mean- ders, six ponds, four freshwater marshes of which three are old peat bogs, two riverine wetlands and three shallow eutrophic lakes. All are colonized by aquatic plants (emergent, submersed, floating macrophytes and pleustophytes) and have permanent Oglio Mincio Po MI1 MI3 MI4 OG3 OG11
  • 14. OG7 OG2 PO7 OG6 OG8 OG9 OG10 OG1 N 0 10 20 km PO2 MI2 PO1 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 OG4 OG5 Oglio
  • 15. Mincio Po MI1 MI3 MI4 OG3 OG11 OG7 Fig. 1 Location of the 22 sampling sites in the Po River Plain (Northern Italy) Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 337 123 T a b le 1 M a in
  • 59. li s, C a re x sp p . 338 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 T a b le 1 c o n ti n u
  • 105. sp p . Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 339 123 standing water (depth [0.25 m). We categorized the 22 wetland sites by both Hydrogeomorphic Classifi- cation (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosselink 2000; Lin 2006) and Functional Classification of European Wetlands (Simpson 2002). The wetlands exhibit different degrees of hydraulic connectivity with the adjacent rivers (Table 1). Connectivity was assessed from map elevation and hydrological data (water levels) of the considered rivers (Technical Regional Maps of Lombardy Region http://www. cartografia.regione.lombardia.it; AdBPo 2001–2008). All wetlands were also directly surveyed in order to detect interventions/alterations, e.g. embankments,
  • 106. levees or berms. Ten sites are permanently connected: OG1–OG6 and MI4 have an inlet river channel while MI1–MI3 represent a river digression with unidirec- tional water movement. These ten wetlands are clas- sified as ‘‘Riverine wetland with surface inflow and unidirectional flow’’ (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosselink 2000; Lin 2006) or as ‘‘Eastern Continental River Marginal Wetlands belonging to unconfined channel sub-type—ECRM2H3P’’ (Simpson 2002). The remaining 12 wetlands are isolated because of canal infilling, weirs and embankments. The primary water sources in the isolated wetlands are ground- water, precipitation and runoff, with the water movement due largely to vertical fluctuation. They are classified as ‘‘Isolated depression supplied by groundwater discharge and characterized by vertical fluctuation’’ (Brinson et al. 1998; Mitsch and Gosse- link 2000; Lin 2006) or as ‘‘Eastern Continental River
  • 107. Marginal Wetlands belonging to separated channel sub-type—ECRM3H2P’’ (Simpson 2002). Sampling program We sampled water and sediments during winter (January–March) and summer (June–August) 2007. Intact sediments were collected at each site with transparent Plexiglas cores with different dimensions (diameter 9 length) for sediment characterization (5 9 30 cm, n = 3) and flux measurements (8 9 40 cm, n = 4). All cores were transferred in a box with cooled site water and brought to the laboratory within a few hours of sampling for further processing and incubation. Also, on each sampling date, approx- imately 100 l of water were collected and brought to the laboratory for cores maintenance and incubations. During sampling, site water was characterized for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen with a YSI Multi- Probe (model 556, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) and
  • 108. dissolved inorganic carbon and nitrogen (see later for analytical methods). Sediment characteristics Benthic microalgal biomass was measured as chlo- rophyll-a (Chl-a) concentration in the top 0.5 cm of sediment and determined spectrophotometrically after extraction with 90% acetone (Lorenzen 1967). Bulk density was determined as the ratio between wet weight and volume (typically 5 ml) of sediment. Organic matter content (OM) was measured as percentage of weight loss by ignition (450�C, 2 h) from dried sediment. Total C and N content were determined from dried sediments with a Carlo Erba elemental analyzer (CHNS-O EA 1108). Dissolved oxygen, inorganic carbon and nutrient flux measurements Intact cores preincubation and incubation proce- dures followed the standardized protocol described by Dalsgaard et al. (2000). In the laboratory, all
  • 109. cores were immediately submersed with the top open in a tank containing in situ aerated and well mixed water at ambient temperature. During prein- cubation, water was stirred inside the tubes and headwater exchange with the tank water was ensured by Teflon-coated magnetic bars suspended 5 cm above the sediment–water interface to mini- mize particle resuspension and driven by an external motor at 40 rpm. The day after the sampling, the water in the tank was exchanged and the cores were incubated for flux measurements of O2 (or sediment oxygen demand, SOD), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN = NH4 ? ? NO2 - ? NO3
  • 110. - ). Incubations were started by lower- ing the water in the tank just below the top of the cores and by sealing the cores with floating lids provided with a sampling port. The cores were incubated in the dark at field temperature for 2–5 h with continuous stirring. Incubation time was set to keep oxygen concentration at the end to within 20% of the initial value. 340 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it http://www.cartografia.regione.lombardia.it Water samples (60 ml) were collected at regular time intervals using plastic syringes from the water phase (750 ml). Samples for O2 determinations were transferred to glass vials (Exetainer, Labco, High Wycombe, UK) and Winkler reagents were added
  • 111. immediately (Strickland and Parsons 1972). Samples for DIC were also transferred in glass vials and immediately titrated with 0.1 N HCl (Anderson et al. 1986). Samples for NH4 ? , NO3 - and NO2 - determi- nations were filtered through Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters, transferred to plastic vials and frozen. NH4 ? was determined spectrophotometrically using salicylate and hypochlorite in the presence of sodium nitroprussiate (Bower and Holm-Hansen 1980). NO3 - was determined after reduction to NO2 -
  • 112. in the presence of cadmium, and NO2 - was determined spectrophotometrically using sulphanilamide and N-(1-naphtyl)ethylendiamine (Golterman et al. 1978). Fluxes of O2, DIC, NH4 ? , NO2 - and NO3 - were calculated from the changes in concentrations in the cores with time by linear regression and expressed as rate per square meter. Negative fluxes indicate flux from the water column to the sediment while positive fluxes indicate effluxes from sediment to the water column. From dark fluxes of inorganic carbon and oxygen
  • 113. we calculated the respiratory quotient RQ (Dilly 2003; Hargrave et al. 2008), according to the following equation: RQ ¼ CO2 flux O2 fluxj j : Denitrification measurements The isotope pairing technique (Nielsen 1992) was used to measure denitrification (dark rates) on the same set of cores used for solute fluxes. Incubations for solute fluxes and denitrification were sequential and both performed the day after the sampling. The water in the tank was renewed between the two incubations, and the open cores were submersed for a couple of hours. The IPT allows for differentiation of total denitrification (Dtot), denitrification of nitrate diffusing to the anoxic sediment from the water column (DW) and denitrification of nitrate produced
  • 114. within the sediment due to nitrification (DN). Methodological concerns have been raised about the IPT, mainly due to the concurrence of anammox which cannot be discriminated from denitrification as a source of N2 and makes invalid the assumptions on which IPT calculations are based. Recent studies showed that anammox can contribute half or more of the N2 production in coastal shelves and deep seas (Dalsgaard et al. 2005; Trimmer et al. 2006), while it represents a minor fraction of N2 production in eutrophic and organic-rich freshwater ecosystems (Burgin and Hamilton 2007; Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009). Therefore, we adopted the IPT as we considered this method as accurate for freshwater eutrophic sites, assuming that the anammox contri- bution was negligible to N2 fluxes (Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2003; Trimmer et al. 2003; Schubert et al. 2006; Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009).
  • 115. At the beginning of the experiment, the water in the tank was lowered just below the top of the cores; and a water subsample (5 ml) was taken from each core for NO3 - concentration measurement. Different amounts of 15 NO3 - from a 15 mM Na 15 NO3 solution were then added to the water column of each of the 4 replicate cores to perform a concentration series experiment (see Dalsgaard et al. 2000). Labelled nitrate was added to the cores to have a final 15 N atom% of at least 30%. Within 5 min of the addition of
  • 116. 15 NO3 - another water sample was collected from each core to calculate the 14 N/ 15 N ratio in the NO3 - pool; the cores were then closed with floating lids and the incubation started (3–5 h). At the end of the incubation, 5–10 ml of ZnCl2 (7 M) was added to the water phase, and then sediment and water were mixed. An aliquot of the slurry was transferred to a 12.5 ml gas-tight vial; 14 N 15 N and 15 N
  • 117. 15 N abundance in N2 were analyzed by mass spectrometry at the National Environmental Research Agency, Silkeborg, Denmark (Risgaard-Petersen and Rysgaard 1995). The denitrification rates were calculated according to the equations and assumptions of Nielsen (1992). Denitrification rates were also estimated from sediment oxygen demand and concentrations of nitrate and dissolved oxygen with the model by Christensen et al. (1990): DW ¼ FO2 � a � ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1 þ DNO� 3 DO2 � CNO�
  • 118. 3 CO2 � 1 a � � s � 1 " # where FO2 is the dark sediment oxygen demand, a is the ratio between depth-specific denitrification and O2 consumption activity (*0.8, Christensen et al. 1990), DNO� 3 and DO2 are the diffusion coefficients of Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 341 123 nitrate and oxygen, and CNO� 3 and CO2 are the water column nitrate and oxygen concentrations, respec-
  • 119. tively. Modeled rates represent denitrification of nitrate diffusing into anoxic sediments from the water column. Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (ver. 16.0) to test for significant differences between seasons and between hydrological connectivity of wetlands. Inferential testing was done for every measured variable (temperature, sedimentary oxygen demand, dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes, respira- tory quotient, ammonium fluxes, oxidized forms of inorganic nitrogen fluxes, denitrification rates, organic matter content, benthic microalgal biomass, and bulk density). We did not use parametric statistics because of violations of assumptions of normality (Kolmogorov– Smirnov test with Lilliefors significance correction) and homogeneity of variance (Levene test). Even after
  • 120. the application of the Cox–Box method, for log transformations, normality was not verified, largely as a result of frequent outliers. Therefore the non-parametric Wilcoxon paired- sample T test was used to test the differences between winter and summer distributions (n1 = n2 = 22), and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for differences between isolated and connected wetlands (n1 = 24 and n2 = 20). When the Wilcoxon test was significant, we analyzed the hydrological connectiv- ity after separating the winter and the summer data (n1 = 12 and n2 = 10). We identified the correlative relationship among variables with the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (q). Differences were considered non-significant if P [ 0.05. Results General features of water column and surface sediments
  • 121. Environmental conditions in both the water column and sediments were measured in association with rate measurements (Tables 2, 3). Water temperature medians were 10�C (range 5–13�C) in winter and 25�C (range 22–27�C) in summer. Water column pH was alkaline in both seasons and ranged between 7.21 and 8.57. DIC concentrations ranged from 1.90 to 7.07 mM in winter and from 2.07 to 6.63 mM in summer; no significant differences were found between seasons and between connected and isolated sites. Dissolved CO2 saturation, calculated from temperature, pH and DIC data, indicated a general supersaturation in the water column with significant differences between winter and summer periods (median 217%, range 147–464% and median 581%, range 155–4,173%, respectively; Wilcoxon T test, P 0.001). In particular, for summer, we found higher percentages of CO2 saturation values in isolated than in connected sites (Mann–Whitney U
  • 122. test, P 0.05). Dissolved O2 concentrations were significantly higher in winter than in summer (Wilcoxon T test, P 0.01), while percentages of dissolved O2 satura- tion were similar between seasons. In winter, median values of % O2 saturation were close to 100% for both wetland types (97% in isolated and 85% in connected sites). In summer, % O2 saturation tended to be lower at isolated sites (median value 63%) and hypoxia established in wetlands colonized by Lemn- aceae (Table 2). Nitrate concentrations were extremely variable and were not significantly different between seasons (Wilcoxon T test, P = 0.3) (Table 2). In wetlands permanently connected with the river, median values of nitrate concentrations were not different between seasons (360 lM in winter and 367 lM in summer), but were significantly higher than those measured at isolated sites (Mann–Whitney U tests, P 0.001). Here, nitrate contents were significantly greater in
  • 123. winter (median 10 lM) than in summer (median 2 lM). According to the predictions of the model proposed by Christensen et al. (1990), the NO3 - :O2 ratios of connected sites were theoretically favorable to denitrification, with similar or higher availability of nitrate compared to oxygen in bottom waters (Table 2). Sediment OM content, Chl-a concentrations and bulk density were not statistically different between seasons (Table 3). OM content and bulk density ranges were typical of environments characterized by elevated sedimentation rates, soft and reducing sediment, and anaerobic metabolism. Sediment OM content was significantly higher and bulk density was significantly lower in isolated compared to connected 342 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123
  • 175. d c lo se to th e se d im e n t su rf a c e Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 343 123 wetlands (Mann–Whitney U tests, P 0.01 and P 0.001, respectively), likely due to their pensile and stagnant condition. Higher values of OM were observed in marshes (old peat bogs) and in ponds
  • 176. characterized by pleustonic communities. Chl-a con- centrations were high and similar among sites and seasons. Sediment C:N ratio displayed a large variability among sites and no statistical differences were found between wetland types in both winter and summer. Benthic processes As expected, season had effects on benthic processes, and these are likely related to temperature differ- ences. SOD was significantly correlated with water temperature (Spearman q = -0.379, P 0.05) and with bulk sediment density (Spearman q = 0.332, P 0.05) but not with OM content in sediments (Spearman q = -0.162, P = 0.3); SOD increased from winter to summer (median values -1.14 and -2.54 mmol O2 m -2 h -1 , respectively) (Wilcoxon T test, P 0.05) (Fig. 2). Significant differences of
  • 177. SOD rates were found between isolated and con- nected wetlands only in winter (Mann–Whitney U tests, P 0.01) whilst in summer no statistical differences resulted (Mann–Whitney U tests, P = 0.1) (Fig. 2). In a number of sites, DIC effluxes tended to increase from winter to summer, but they were not significantly correlated with water temper- ature (Spearman q = 0.193, P = 0.3). Differences between seasons were also not significant (Wilcoxon T test, P = 0.2) with median values of 1.95 (range 0.64–16.70) and 3.61 (range 0.41–11.06) mmol DIC m -2 h -1 in winter and in summer, respectively. Inorganic carbon effluxes corresponding to SOD rates in place and time resulted in variable respiratory quotients in both seasons (RQ) (Fig. 2). RQ medians were slightly above 1 in winter and in summer, with
  • 178. values of 1.21 (range 0.52–11.33) and 1.29 (range 0.11–6.95), respectively (Wilcoxon T test, P = 0.5). The inorganic nitrogen fluxes were evaluated for patterns associated with season and connectivity (Fig. 3). Ammonium fluxes underwent a great spatial and seasonal variability. Differences between seasons were statistically significant (Wilcoxon T test, P 0.05) with lower values in winter (median -5, range -462 to 864 lmol N m-2 h-1) than in sum- mer (median 345, -676 to 2,670 lmol N m-2 h-1) when fluxes were mainly directed from sediment to the water column (Fig. 3). No statistical differences were identified among wetland types, although during winter in connected wetlands ammonium flux tended to be directed from the water to the sediment (Mann– Whitney U test, P = 0.1). A significant correlation was found between ammonium fluxes and SOD (Spearman q = 0.480, P 0.01), temperature (Spearman q = 0.452, P 0.01) and bulk sediment density (Spearman q = -0.386, P 0.05). As a general tendency, the fluxes of the oxidized forms of
  • 179. inorganic nitrogen were directed from the water column to the sediment surface. Nitrite fluxes (from -131 to 188 lmol N m-2 h-1, median -1 lmol N m-2 h-1) comprised between 0 and 42% (average of the whole dataset 5%) of NOx - benthic exchanges (=NO2 - ? NO3 - ). Median values of NOx - fluxes in winter and in summer were respectively -44 lmol N m-2 h-1, range -1,616 to 608 lmol N m-2 h-1, and -68 lmol N m-2 h-1, range -4,062 to 2,014 lmol N m-2 h-1 (Fig. 3). NOx - sedimentary demand did not demonstrate a statistically significant seasonal difference and increased in summer relative to winter in only 14 out of 22 sampling sites (Mann–Whitney U test,
  • 180. Table 3 Median and range (in parenthesis) are reported for organic matter content (OM), bulk density (d), chlorophyll-a concen- trations (Chl-a) and C:N molar ratios in surface sediments (0–1 cm) Variable Riverine connected wetlands Isolated wetlands Winter Summer Winter Summer OM (%) 10.4 (2.3–14.1) 10.6 (1.5–16.9) 15.9 (5.2–34.5) 17.8 (5.8–34.8) d (g cm -3 ) 1.2 (1.0–1.5) 1.1 (1–1.7) 1.0 (0.9–1.4) 0.9 (0.9–1.2) Chl-a (lg cm-3) 24.7 (22.9–48.9) 25.6 (14.4–32.5) 23.75 (11.8– 37.2) 23.15 (13.1–35.9) C:N (mol:mol) 22.4 (10.7–27) 20.8 (10.9–25.7) 14.9 (10.9–21) 15.4 (11–24.8) n = 10 for riverine connected wetlands and n = 12 for isolated wetlands in each season 344 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 P = 0.1). Wetland type affected NOx -
  • 181. fluxes (Mann– Whitney U test, P 0.05) (Fig. 3). Influx rates were higher in environments connected to rivers in summer (Mann–Whitney U test, P 0.05), but no effects of connectivity were found in winter (Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.5). A positive correlation was found between NOx - sedimentary demand and NO3 - concentration (Spearman q = 0.575, P 0.001) and between NOx - sedimentary demand and per- centage of dissolved CO2 saturation in the water column (Spearman q = 0.323, P 0.05). Results of ammonium and NOx - flux measurements were combined. No significant differences were found between seasons or between wetland types for DIN (NH4
  • 182. ? ? NOx - ) fluxes (Fig. 3). Denitrification rates Nitrogen removal via denitrification was responsive to season. Total denitrification rates (Dtot = DW ? DN) were extremely variable and ranged between 5 and *2,000 lmol N m-2 h-1; N2 effluxes were signifi- cantly higher in summer than in winter (Wilcoxon T test, P 0.01) (Fig. 4). Dtot was mostly supported by water column nitrate (DW) and exhibited the highest values in connected wetlands in both seasons (Mann– Whitney U tests, P 0.001 and P 0.001 in summer and winter, respectively). Both DW and DN were lower in winter than in summer (Wilcoxon T tests, P 0.05). DW ranged between 2 and 300 lmol N m -2 h -1 in winter and between 3 and 1,888 lmol N m-2 h-1 in summer supporting about 90 ± 18 and 71 ± 26% of
  • 183. Dtot in the two periods, respectively. DN ranged from 0 to 67 and from 0 to 205 lmol N m-2 h-1 in winter and summer, respectively. Overall, denitrification activity was affected by wetland type and correlated with several environ- mental factors. Comparing rates among wetland types, we found lower DW rates in isolated sites both in winter and in summer (Mann–Whitney U tests, P 0.01 and P 0.001, respectively). DN rates were only significantly lower in winter (Mann–Whitney U test, P 0.05). Dtot rates correlated positively with NO3 - concentrations (Spearman q = 0.748, P 0.001), sedimentary NOx - demand (Spearman q = 0.691, P 0.001), dissolved inorganic carbon concentration (Spearman q = 0.339, P 0.05) and sediment bulk density (Spearman q = 0.341, P 0.05). Dtot was not correlated with sediment OM content. Similar relationships resulted for DW,
  • 184. reflecting the higher importance of this fraction on total denitrification. DN was correlated only with temperature (Spearman q = 0.368, P 0.05). Increasing amounts of added 15 NO3 - in the cores’ m m o l m -2 h -1 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2
  • 186. RQ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 WI SI WC SC ** ** O2 fluxes + Fig. 2 Dark sediment oxygen demand (SOD), dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes (DIC) and respiratory quotient (RQ) measured at the 22 sampling sites and split up considering winter (W) and summer (S) seasons and connected (C) and isolated (I) wetland types. Seasonal differences ( ? P 0.05, ?? P 0.01, ??? P 0.001) were tested with the Wilcoxon
  • 187. T test; hydrogeomorphic differences (* P 0.05, ** P 0.01, *** P 0.001) were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 345 123 water phase resulted in an immediate stimulation of denitrification rates as D15 (i.e. denitrification of 15 NO3 - added to the water column). The increases in rate were linear with the nitrate enrichment, both in some isolated wetlands with low nitrate concentration and in a nitrate-rich, connected wetland (Fig. 5). Finally, we applied the model of Christensen et al. (1990) using as data input NO3 - and O2 concentration in the water (Table 2) and dark O2 fluxes measured via cores incubation. The model is unidimensional, works in sediments that are neither
  • 188. bioturbated nor colonized by phanerogams and predicts only rates of denitrification supported by water column nitrate (DW). Theoretical DW values calculated for the 22 wetlands (pooled winter and summer data) showed a very good fitting with DW measured via the IPT (Spearman q = 0.847, P 0.01) only in a limited range of rates (0–140 lmol N m-2 h-1) (Fig. 6). Outputs of the model agree well with experimental results from wetlands characterized by low NO3 - in the water; on the contrary predicted rates are much higher than those measured at sites with elevated nitrate concentrations. Discussion Denitrification in shallow eutrophic wetlands compared to other ecosystems and methodological considerations The removal of nitrogen in freshwater wetlands is widely reported in the literature (Piña-Ochoa and
  • 189. Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). However, compared to other aquatic environments, few direct measurements of denitrification rates have been performed. A summary m o l m -2 h -1 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 (a) (b)
  • 190. (c) (d) 3000 WI SI WC SC NH4 + fluxes + DIN fluxes m o l m -2 h -1 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000
  • 191. SCWI SI WC NOX - fluxes m o l m -2 h -1 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 WI SI * * NOx - fluxes
  • 193. (a), NOx - (=NO2 - ? NO3 - ) (b, c) and DIN (d) dark fluxes measured via intact core incubations at the 22 sampling sites and split up considering winter (W) and summer (S) seasons and connected (C) and isolated (I) wetland types. NOx - fluxes are shown in two graphs with different scales. Seasonal differences ( ? P 0.05, ?? P 0.01, ??? P 0.001) were tested with the Wilcoxon T test; hydrogeomorphic differences (* P 0.05, ** P 0.01, *** P 0.001) were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test b 346 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123
  • 194. of recent reports of denitrification measurements is presented in Table 4. A direct comparison with our data is somewhat limited by the fact that experi- mental designs and methods are different among the studies. Reported rates range between 1 and 3,188 lmol N m-2 h-1 and bracket our measured averages both in isolated, 49 lmol N m-2 h-1, and in connected, 340 lmol N m-2 h-1, wetlands (medians 30 and 286 lmol N m-2 h-1, respectively). The range of isolated wetlands within the Po watershed compares well with other riparian wetlands and with some constructed wetlands (Table 4). River- connected sites have higher rates and are within the reported ranges for constructed wetlands in California, Sweden and Arizona. These all receive pulsing floods by river and hydraulic connec- tivity may explain the higher rates in literature (12–3,188 lmol N m-2 h-1). The connected riverine wetlands that we studied are among the ecosystems with highest denitrification
  • 195. rates. Reported values are higher than those found in marine environments and comparable to freshwater ecosystems, in particular with rivers. Much lower denitrification rates measured in isolated wetlands are similar to those reported for marine areas (Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). In the recent literature a novel microbial process, the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium, has been found to be responsible for a major fraction of N2 m o l N m -2 h -1 0 50 100
  • 198. ** *** *** * * (a) (b) (c) *** *** *** *** Fig. 4 Rates of denitrification measured with the isotope pairing technique at the 22 sites. Data are grouped in winter (W) and summer (S) values of connected (C) and isolated (I) wetland types and show total denitrification rates (Dtot, a), denitrification of nitrate diffusing to anoxic sediments from the water column (DW, b) and denitrification of nitrate produced within sediments by nitrification (DN, c). Seasonal differences ( ? P 0.05, ?? P 0.01, ??? P 0.001) were tested with
  • 199. the Wilcoxon T test; hydrogeomorphic differences (* P 0.05, ** P 0.01, *** P 0.001) were tested with the Mann– Whitney U test D W to t (1 5 D W + 1 4 D W , µ m o l N m -2 h -1 )
  • 200. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 NO3 - tot (15NO3 -+14NO3 -, µM) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 PO6 PO4 PO2 OG10 OG8 OG2 low NO3 -
  • 201. high NO3 - Fig. 5 Results from a concentration series experiment in which increasing amounts of labelled nitrate were added to the water phase of intact sediment cores. Sites where increasing 15 NO3 - concentrations resulted in higher denitrification rates are reported. Denitrification of nitrate diffusing to anoxic sediments from the water column (DW) was generally stimulated meaning that, at sites with low nitrate concentration in the water column, the denitrification potential was elevated but only partially expressed Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 347 123 flux, in particular in deep marine environments (Thamdrup and Dalsgaard 2002). Apart from the relevance of anammox for the nitrogen cycle, this
  • 202. finding poses serious methodological concerns on the assumptions on which the IPT is built (Risgaard- Petersen et al. 2003; Trimmer et al. 2006). In particular, as the relevance of anammox to N2 total flux (ra) increases, the risk of overestimating true denitrification rates by IPT increases (Risgaard- Petersen et al. 2003). There are only a few papers, mostly dealing with deep marine ecosystems, where anammox has been measured and rates compared with those of denitrification. The available measure- ments performed in eutrophic brackish or freshwater environments indicate a minor relevance of anammox to the overall N2 fluxes, but more investigation is needed (Trimmer et al. 2003; Schubert et al. 2006; Koop-Jakobsen and Giblin 2009). Using the equa- tions reported in Risgaard-Petersen et al. (2003) and Trimmer et al. (2006), we calculated from our experiments the risk of overestimating denitrification
  • 203. rates by combining ra and r14 (the ratio between 14 NOx - and 15 NOx - in the nitrate reduction zone). Even if not properly designed for such calculations, our denitrification experiment, based on increasing additions of 15 NO3 - to the water phase, allows such estimates. Our results indicate that ra is low at both connected and isolated sites and during both sampling seasons (0–16%, median value 6%), while r14 is high at connected sites ([3) and variable (0.1 r14 3) at isolated sites. The combination of these percent-
  • 204. ages gives a theoretical overestimation of N2 pro- duction via denitrification between 0 and 26% (median values of pooled data 7%). We recognize that further experimental work should be addressed to evaluate more accurately anammox rates and the regulation of this process in freshwater wetlands. Regulation of denitrification In this study, denitrification was positively correlated with nitrate concentration and was favored in con- nected wetlands where we found higher concentra- tions and availability of nitrate in both seasons (Fig. 4; Table 2). NO3 - concentrations in the water column of connected sites were comparable to those in the adjoining rivers (Mincio River, about 150 lM, and in the Oglio River, about 400 lM), while isolated wetlands had much lower concentrations. Rates measured in environments hydraulically connected to rivers were up to 1 or 2 orders of magnitude higher
  • 205. than rates measured in isolated wetlands (Fig. 4). As widely reported in the literature, water column nitrate concentration is the main factor controlling the kinetics of denitrification in many ecosystems (Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006; Seitzinger et al. 2006). As a general rule we found that DW contributed mostly to Dtot. Nitrification in organically 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 D W t h e o
  • 206. re tic a l ( µ m o l N m -2 h -1 ) DW measured (µmol N m -2 h-1) DW measured (µmol N m -2 h-1) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 D W t h e o
  • 207. re tic a l ( µ m o l N m -2 h -1 ) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140(b)(a) Fig. 6 Denitrification rates of nitrate diffusing to anoxic
  • 208. sediments from the water column (DW), calculated according to the model of Christensen et al. (1990), are plotted versus rates measured at all sites (a) and at sites with low water column nitrate content (b) 348 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 loaded wetlands was severely limited by oxygen availability and was a minor source of NO3 - for coupled denitrification. The exceptions were a few isolated environments with little to no nitrate in the water column during summer months and with a sufficient amount of oxygen for nitrification to proceed. Similar trends, reported by Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas (2006), confirm that water column nitrate regulates the ratio between DW and DN. Our experiments using a concentration series (increasing amounts of
  • 209. 15 NO3 - added in cores) dem- onstrated that most of the sites exhibited high denitri- fication potential (D15), and thus the process was not saturated. This was especially true for almost all isolated wetlands in which the in situ process was probably nitrogen-limited by stagnant conditions and by limited nutrient recharge from flooding by river pulses. In connected environments with extremely high nitrate concentration ([500 lM), we did not measure a corresponding increase of D15, which is indicative of substrate saturation, with only one exception (Fig. 5). The kinetics of denitrification are more uncertain when nitrate concentrations are saturating and other factors can limit the reaction, e.g. availability of labile organic carbon (Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006). Also, in those environments where nitrate concentrations did
  • 210. not change significantly in the two sampling periods, denitrification rates increased from the winter to the summer, indicating that water temperature was an important regulating factor. Many studies reported a breakpoint of temperature response of denitrification that reflects the fact that rates fall non-linearly at lower temperatures (Focht and Verstraete 1977; Hènault and Germon 2000). There are several potential links between denitri- fication and other metabolisms in sediments, includ- ing SOD. SOD in this study was in the higher range of rates reported in the literature for wetlands, Table 4 Denitrification rates measured in different types of shallow eutrophic freshwater environments, including results from the present study Type of wetland Location Method for measuring denitrification rates Denitrification rate
  • 211. (lmol N m-2 h-1) References Riparian wetlands New Jersey (USA) N2 fluxes 20–260 Seitzinger (1994) Constructed wetlands receiving river water California (USA) Mass balance 12–3,188 Reilly et al. (2000) Wetland system treating effluent from a sewage treatment plant Netherlands Acetylene inhibition 1–360 Toet et al. (2003) Wastewater treatment wetland Sweden Acetylene inhibition 714–1,786 Bastviken et al. (2005) Riparian buffer zone Estonia N2 fluxes 14–571 Teiter and Mander (2005) Constructed wetland Switzerland Isotope mass balance 3–661 Reinhardt et al. (2006) Marsh receiving water from river Louisiana (USA) Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) 179–679 Yu et al. (2006)
  • 212. Constructed wetlands receiving river water Ohio (USA) Acetylene inhibition 14–129 Hernandez and Mitsch (2007) Constructed marsh receiving water pumped from river Texas (USA) N2/Ar (MIMS) 54–278 Scott et al. (2008) Constructed wetland receiving water from drainage ditch Indiana (USA) Isotope pairing 40–175 Herrman and White (2008) (in press) Constructed wetlands Arizona (USA) Mass balance 677–1,248 Kadlec (2008) Constructed wetlands receiving river water Japan Acetylene inhibition 149–185 Zhou and Hosomi (2008) Isolated wetlands Italy Isotope pairing 2–231 This study Riverine connected wetlands Italy Isotope pairing 35–1,888
  • 213. This study Apart from Seitzinger (1994), reported values were calculated from original data and expressed in lmol N m-2 h-1 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 349 123 eutrophic lakes, and rivers (Christensen et al. 1990; Nielsen et al. 1990; Seitzinger 1994; Scott et al. 2008). Seasonal temperature was a key factor for SOD, but unlike other reports we did not find a significant correlation between SOD and Dtot (Sei- tzinger 1994; Eyre and Ferguson 2002). According to the simple but robust model proposed by Christensen et al. (1990), denitrification can be predicted by a combination of SOD and NO3 - :O2 ratio. Shallow water environments with high SOD, high nitrate concentrations and anoxia should have a great
  • 214. potential for nitrogen removal via denitrification. The model was originally developed for Northern European sites characterized by lower SOD and lower NO3 - :O2, but appears to be more generally applicable to our systems. However, in some con- nected wetlands where nitrate concentrations were high, we found much higher predicted than measured rates. This could result from saturation of denitrifi- cation, nonlinearity of the model at extremes SOD rates or NO3 - :O2 ratios, occurrence of other more favorable microbial transformation of NO3 - as DNRA or underestimation of real rates due to insufficient 15
  • 215. NO3 - labeling (Brunet and Garcia-Gil 1996; Gardner and McCarthy 2009). Denitrification rates were not correlated with the large pool of sedimentary OM content (*10% or more), even though this variable is widely recognized as an important regulator of the process (Ingersoll and Baker 1998; Piña-Ochoa and Álvarez-Cobelas 2006; Seitzinger et al. 2006). Nitrogen removal was also not correlated with Chl-a content in sediments, even if this represented a large pool of labile, easily degrad- able organic carbon. Excess organic matter availabil- ity at the study sites can mask the effect of these factors. Sensitivity of denitrification to nitrate concentra- tion has significant implications to water quality and management of wetlands. N removal appears to be highly sensitive to both the availability of nitrate and
  • 216. to temperature. The connected wetlands showed highest denitrification rates due to regular nitrate recharge by water bodies. The potential for increased denitrification in isolated wetlands was demonstrated by our series of increasing nitrate additions. If these environments were connected and received pulsing floods of river water, they should be able to remove high amounts of nitrate from the water column and serve an important role in nutrient removal. Denitrification efficiency in shallow eutrophic wetland sediments: N sink or sources? Hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands influ- ences nitrogen removal efficiency in more ways than simply through increasing nitrate concentration. Denitrification efficiency is evaluated as the ratio between denitrification rates and inorganic nitrogen effluxes across the sediment–water interface (Dtot/ (Dtot ? DIN)). It represents the percentage of the
  • 217. total processed inorganic nitrogen during organic matter decomposition released as N2 (Eyre and Ferguson 2002). According to Eyre and Ferguson (2002), efficiencies close to 1 mean that net loss of nitrogen is in gaseous form from the system, while values close to 0 mean that inorganic nitrogen ions are recycled to the water column and may sustain new primary production. Calculated denitrification efficiencies for the 10 connected and 12 isolated wetlands studied in this work are reported in Fig. 7. In both seasons, denitrification efficiency in isolated wetlands was below 0.2, suggesting that these environments tended to be sources of inorganic nitrogen with ammonification (or dissimilative reduc- tion of nitrate to ammonium) prevailing over deni- trification (Gardner and McCarthy 2009). Low denitrification efficiency at isolated wetlands means that these sites tended to maintain eutrophic–hype-
  • 218. reutrophic conditions with cycling between plank- tonic or macrophytic primary production, organic matter settling, fast regeneration of the labile fraction and burial of the recalcitrant litter, resulting in rapid infilling. Benthic nitrogen cycling in these environ- ments appears to be simplified due to negligible nitrification/denitrification processes and limited availability of oxidized inorganic nitrogen forms. Connected wetlands tended to be sources of DIN to the water column, with ratios below 0.5 in winter, while in summer they tended to be nitrogen sinks (denitrification efficiency median 0.65, range 0.4– 0.8). Hydraulic connectivity likely maintains oxi- dized conditions in the water and in the upper sediment layers and low ratios of sedimentary organic carbon to nitrate availability, enhancing permanent N removal. The fraction of total NO3 -
  • 219. uptake undergoing denitrification was calculated dividing N2 production (from DW) by NO3 - fluxes (only negative values). At connected sites the ratio was 0.5 and 1.0 in winter and 350 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 summer, respectively (median values). These num- bers suggest that in winter only half of the nitrate uptake was due to denitrification while in summer most of the nitrate was removed via this process. At isolated sites the calculated Dw to NO3 - flux ratio was 0.6 and 0.5 in winter and summer, respectively (median values), suggesting that at both sampling seasons other processes besides denitrification were
  • 220. responsible for an important fraction of NO3 - uptake. Dissimilative nitrate reduction to ammonium, dark incorporation in microphytobenthos and bacteria or other microbially mediated or chemical processes could be relevant processes in the studied wetlands. Denitrification rates in freshwater wetlands could be addressed in a mass balance context to assess the relevance of the process at a basin scale. We calculated the N budget according to the ‘‘Soil System Budget’’ (Oenema et al. 2003) for the lower Oglio River basin, where most of the studied wetlands are located. For this 3,700 km 2 watershed we estimated an annual nitrogen surplus of 32,633 metric ton (t) N and we calculated, assuming highest measured denitrification rates (1,260 kg N ha
  • 221. -1 - year -1 ) and hydraulic connection for all wetlands in the basin, a potential N removal of only 250 t N year -1 . In fact even if maximum denitrifica- tion rates on areal basis are about nine-folds higher than average N surplus (143 kg N ha -1 AL year -1 ; AL = Agricultural Land), total riverine wetlands area (*200 ha) is three orders of magnitude smaller than agricultural lands (*230,000 ha) within the catchment. According to Verhoeven et al. (2006), wetland environments contribute significantly to water quality improvement if they account for at
  • 222. least 10% of the watershed area, while in the Oglio basin and likely in the Po River Plain the potential of wetlands to remove excess N is at present irrelevant due to their overall negligible surface (�1%). Benthic respiration and denitrification in shallow eutrophic wetlands This last section intends to (1) clarify the role of denitrification in organic matter mineralization in light of measured benthic metabolism and (2) quan- tify the links among metabolic rates, connectivity and N removal. The elevated rates of oxygen consump- tion and the low oxygen reserve in the water column measured in the shallow wetlands of the Po River Plain are typical of environments that risk anoxia. We calculated that in summer isolated wetlands can turn hypoxic to anoxic in less than 10 h, mainly in the night, without the offset of photosynthesis. The ratio between SOD and DIC fluxes enabled us to evaluate
  • 223. the importance of anaerobic metabolism. SOD, corrected for oxygen demand due to nitrification, was stoichiometrically comparable or significantly below DIC fluxes. On average, about 77 and 59% of measured DIC fluxes were uncoupled from corre- sponding O2 uptake rates in summer and winter, respectively. Imbalances in SOD and DIC effluxes are typical of eutrophic to dystrophic aquatic envi- ronments and are associated with accumulation of reduced compounds in pore water (Ingvorsen and Brock 1982; Capone and Kiene 1988). Denitrification in isolated wetlands represented molar equivalents on average 9 and 12% of SOD in winter and summer, respectively. In connected environments, these per- centages increased to 19 and 25%, and at some sites the moles of N2 produced via denitrification were winter D to
  • 225. D IN ) 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 connectedisolated all sites isolated all sites Fig. 7 Denitrification efficiencies calculated according to Eyre and Ferguson (2002) (see the text for major details) Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 351 123 comparable to the moles of O2 respired. Oxygen consumed via nitrification, calculated as the sum of 2DN ? 2NOx -
  • 226. efflux, was a minor fraction of SOD. It averaged 11 and 3% of SOD in winter and summer, respectively, and represented only 2 and 14% of SOD for isolated and connected sites. Oxygen consump- tion was thus mainly due to aerobic carbon miner- alization and to the reoxidation of anaerobic metabolism end products. We estimated carbon oxidation by denitrification assuming 1.25 C:1 N (mol:mol) (Richards 1965) to evaluate the contribution of denitrification to organic matter mineralization. Total denitrification rates were responsible for an extremely variable production of inorganic carbon, varying between 5 and 450 lmol C m -2 h -1 in winter (average of pooled data 98 ± 23 lmol C m-2 h-1) and between 11 and 2,369 lmol C m-2 h-1 in summer (average of pooled data 355 ± 108 lmol C m-2 h-1). Assuming that
  • 227. DIC fluxes were a proxy for organic carbon mineral- ization, we estimated that the fraction of carbon oxidation due to denitrification ranged from 1 to 83%, with winter and summer averages of 7.7 and 13.0%, respectively. In connected sites, this fraction was generally ecologically significant (10–83%), while in isolated sites it was 5%. We thus demon- strated that in riverine connected wetlands denitrifica- tion was significant (1) for the removal of nitrogen from NO3 - -polluted waters and (2) as a respiratory process responsible for a significant fraction of carbon mineralization. Similar results were reported for estuarine and shallow marine environments by Yoon and Benner (1992) and Laursen and Seitzinger (2002) and for riparian freshwater wetlands (Seitzinger 1994). Concluding remarks This study demonstrates that connectivity of eutrophic wetlands with rivers is a primary factor in controlling
  • 228. denitrification and nitrogen cycling. At connected sites, denitrification can be an important pathway for nitrogen cycling and a significant component of benthic respiration. Here, denitrification was mostly sustained by nitrate diffusing to anoxic sediments from the water column, which was primarily regu- lated by nitrate availability and temperature. Mea- sured values were within those reported in the literature and, for a wide range of rates (from 5 to 140 lmol N m-2 h-1), can be generally predicted by a simple diffusion–reaction model. Denitrification coupled to nitrification was generally low, probably due to limited oxygen availability within sediments. At hydrologically isolated sites, denitrification was a negligible process with ammonium regeneration largely prevailing over nitrate removal. This can enhance primary productivity, infilling and, perhaps ultimately, the shift of these temporary environments
  • 229. towards more terrestrial conditions, as export of newly formed organic matter is very low. Therefore, the imbalance of nitrogen pathways could also generate feedbacks with a detrimental loss of riparian aquatic habitats which act as regulators of the whole river ecosystem. Pulses of nitrate immediately stimulated denitrifi- cation meaning that all the studied environments had a potential capacity for greater nitrogen removal. This feature has to be taken into account as a key element in the management of the hydrographic network of the Po River Plain, and similar impacted rivers, where nitrate contamination of surface and ground waters is a critical issue. There is evidence from this study, that actions for rehabilitating the lateral connectivity between rivers and riverine aquatic habitats could greatly improve nitrogen removal via denitrification with beneficial effects on water quality
  • 230. and persistence of habitats themselves. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Fondazione Lombardia per l’Ambiente, by the Fili d’Acqua Project, funded by Oglio Sud Natural Park, by the US National Science Foundation grant DEB-0621014, through the Virginia Coast Reserve Long-term Ecological Research program and by the East Carolina University, Biology Department. References AdBPo (2001–2008) Feasibility studies of hydraulic manage- ment for Po River basin water bodies. Po River Basin Authority Web. http://www.adbpo.it/on-multi/ADBPO/ Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianificazione/ Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisiste mazioneidraulica.html. Accessed 30 November 2006 Anderson LG, Hall POJ, Iverfeldt A, van der Loeff MMR, Sundby B, Westerlund SFG (1986) Benthic respiration measured by total carbonate production. Limnol Oceanogr 31:319–329 Arango CP, Tank JL, Johnson LT, Hamilton SK (2006)
  • 231. Assimilatory uptake rather than nitrification and denitri- fication determines nitrogen removal patterns in streams of varying land use. Limnol Oceanogr 53:2558–2572 352 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 http://www.adbpo.it/on- multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem azioneidraulica.html http://www.adbpo.it/on- multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem azioneidraulica.html http://www.adbpo.it/on- multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem azioneidraulica.html http://www.adbpo.it/on- multi/ADBPO/Home/Pianificazione/Studidisupportoallapianific azione/Specifichetecnichegenerali/Specificheperglistudidisistem azioneidraulica.html Bachand PAM, Horne AJ (2000) Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: I. Very high nitrate removal rates in a macrocosm study. Ecol Eng 14:9–15 Bartoli M, Nizzoli D, Viaroli P (2003) Microphytobenthos
  • 232. activity and fluxes at the sediment–water interface: interactions and spatial variability. Aquat Ecol 37:341– 349 Bastviken SK, Eriksson PG, Premrov A, Tonderski K (2005) Potential denitrification in wetland sediments with dif- ferent plant species detritus. Ecol Eng 25:183–190 Bower CE, Holm-Hansen T (1980) A salicylate-hypochlorite method for determining ammonia in seawater. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:794–798 Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Green PA, Vörösmarty CJ (2006) Riverine nitrogen export from the continents to the coasts. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 20:GB1S91 Brandes JA, Devol AH, Deutsch C (2007) New developments in the marine nitrogen cycle. Chem Rev 107:577–589 Brinson MM (1993a) Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74 Brinson MM (1993b) A hydrogeomorphic classification for
  • 233. wetlands. Technical report WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Engi- neer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS Brinson MM, Smith RD, Whigham DF, Lee LC, Rheinhardt RD, Nutter WL (1998) Progress in development of the hydrogeomorphic approach for assessing the functioning of wetlands. Paper presented at INTECOL’s V interna- tional wetland conference, Perth, Australia, 22–28 Sep- tember 1998 Brunet RC, Garcia-Gil LJ (1996) Sulfide-induced dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia in anaerobic freshwater sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 21:131–138 Burgin AJ, Hamilton SK (2007) Have we overemphasized the role of denitrification in aquatic ecosystems? A review of nitrate removal pathways. Front Ecol Environ 5:89–96 Capone DG, Kiene RP (1988) Comparison of microbial dynamics in freshwater and marine environments: con- trasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnol Oceanogr 33:725–749
  • 234. Christensen PB, Nielsen LP, Sorensen J, Revsbech NP (1990) Denitrification in nitrate-rich streams: diurnal and sea- sonal variations related to benthic oxygen metabolism. Limnol Oceanogr 35:640–651 Dalsgaard T, Nielsen LP, Brotas V, Viaroli P, Underwood GJC, Nedwell DB, Sundbäck K, Rysgaard S, Miles A, Bartoli M, Dong L, Thornton DCO, Ottosen LDM, Castaldelli G, Risgaard-Petersen N (2000) Protocol handbook for NICE-nitrogen cycling in estuaries: a pro- ject under the EU research programme. Marine Science and Technology (MAST III), National Environmental Research Institute, Silkeborg, 62 pp Dalsgaard T, Thamdrup B, Canfield DE (2005) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in the marine environ- ment. Res Microbiol 156:457–464 Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and con- sequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926–929 Dilly O (2003) Regulation of the respiratory quotient of soil
  • 235. microbiota by availability of nutrients. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:375–381 Eyre BD, Ferguson AJP (2002) Comparison of carbon pro- duction and decomposition, benthic nutrient fluxes and denitrification in seagrass, phytoplankton, benthic micro- algae and macroalgae dominated warm-temperate Aus- tralian lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:43–59 Focht DD, Verstraete W (1977) Biochemical ecology of nitri- fication and denitrification. Adv Microb Ecol 1:135–214 Gardner WS, McCarthy MJ (2009) Nitrogen dynamics at the sediment–water interface in shallow, sub-tropical Florida Bay: why denitrification efficiency may decrease with increased eutrophication. Biogeochemistry 95:185–198 Golterman HL, Clymo RS, Ohnstand MAM (1978) Methods for physical and chemical analysis of fresh waters. I.B.P. Handbook Nr. 8. Blackwell, Oxford, 213 pp Hargrave BT, Holmer M, Newcombe CP (2008) Towards a classification of organic enrichment in marine sediments
  • 236. based on biogeochemical indicators. Mar Pollut Bull 56:810–824 Hènault C, Germon JC (2000) NEMIS, a predictive model of denitrification on the field scale. Eur J Soil Sci 51:257–270 Hernandez ME, Mitsch WJ (2007) Denitrification in created riverine wetlands: influence of hydrology and season. Ecol Eng 30:78–88 Herrman KS, White JR (2008) Denitrification in intact sedi- ment cores from a constructed wetland: examining the isotope pairing technique. Appl Geochem. doi:0.1016/j. apgeochem.2008.04.024 Ingersoll TL, Baker LA (1998) Nitrate removal in wetland microcosms. Water Res 32:677–684 Ingvorsen K, Brock TD (1982) Electron flow via sulphate reduction and methanogenesis in the anaerobic hypolim- nion of Lake Mendota. Limnol Oceanogr 27:559–564 Jetten MSM (2008) The microbial nitrogen cycle. Environ Microbiol 10:2903–2909
  • 237. Kadlec RH (2008) The effects of wetland vegetation and morphology on nitrogen processing. Ecol Eng 33:126–141 Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton Koop-Jakobsen K, Giblin AE (2009) Anammox in tidal marsh sediments: the role of salinity, nitrogen loading, and marsh vegetation. Estuar Coasts 32:238–245 Laursen AE, Seitzinger SP (2002) The role of denitrification in nitrogen removal and carbon mineralization in Mid- Atlantic Bight sediments. Cont Shelf Res 22:1397–1416 Lin JF (2006) A regional guidebook for applying the hydrog- eomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of de- pressional wetlands in the Upper Des Plaines River Basin. Final report ERDC/EL TR-06-4, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, pp 18–22 Lorenzen CJ (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and phaeo- pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol Ocea- nogr 12:343–346
  • 238. Marchetti R (1993) Problematiche ecologiche del sistema idrog- rafico padano. Quadro di sintesi. Acqua Aria 7:775–789 Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (eds) (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Nielsen LP (1992) Denitrification in sediment determined from nitrogen isotope pairing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86:357–362 Nielsen LP, Christensen PB, Revsbech NP, Sørensen J (1990) Denitrification and photosynthesis in stream sediment Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 353 123 http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.024 http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.024 studied with microsensor and whole-core techniques. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1135–1144 Nixon SW (1995) Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41:199–219 Oenema O, Kros H, De Vries W (2003) Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient
  • 239. management and environmental policies. Eur J Agron 20: 3–16 Piña-Ochoa E, Álvarez-Cobelas M (2006) Denitrification in aquatic environments: a cross-system analysis. Biogeo- chemistry 81:111–130 Provini A, Binelli AP (2006) Environmental quality of the Po River delta. In: Wangersky PJ (ed) Estuaries. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–195 Reilly JF, Horne AJ, Miller CD (2000) Nitrate removal from a drinking water supply with large free-surface constructed wetlands prior to groundwater recharge. Ecol Eng 14: 33–47 Reinhardt M, Müller B, Gächter R, Wehrli B (2006) Nitrogen removal in a small constructed wetland: an isotope mass balance approach. Environ Sci Technol 40:3313–3319 Richards FA (1965) Anoxic basins and fjords. In: Ryley JP, Skirrow G (eds) Chemical oceanography. Academic Press, London, pp 611–645
  • 240. Risgaard-Petersen N (2004) Denitrification. In: Nielsen S, Banta G, Pedersen M (eds) Estuarine nutrient cycling: the influence of primary producers. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 263–280 Risgaard-Petersen N, Rysgaard S (1995) Nitrate reduction in sediments and waterlogged soil measured by 15 N tech- niques. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp 287–310 Risgaard-Petersen N, Nielsen LP, Rysgaard S, Dalsgaard T, Meyer RL (2003) Application of the isotope pairing technique in sediments where anammox and denitrifica- tion coexist. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 1:63–73 Schaller JL, Royer TV, David MB, Tank JL (2004) Denitrifi- cation associated with plants and sediments in an agri- cultural stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:667–676 Schubert CJ, Durisch-Kaiser E, Wehrli B, Thamdrup B, Lam P, Kuypers MMM (2006) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in
  • 241. a tropical freshwater system (Lake Tanganyika). Environ Microbiol. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001074.x Scott TJ, McCarthy MJ, Gardner WS, Doyle RD (2008) Denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammo- nium, and nitrogen fixation along a nitrate concentration gradient in a created freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry 87:99–111 Seitzinger SP (1994) Linkages between organic matter min- eralization and denitrification in eight riparian wetlands. Biogeochemistry 25:19–39 Seitzinger S, Harrison JA, Bohlke JK, Bouwman AF, Low- rance R, Peterson B, Tobias C, van Drecht G (2006) Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 16:2064–2090 Simpson MR (2002) A proposed classification of European wetlands: development and testing. PhD dissertation, University of London Sirivedhin T, Gray KA (2006) Factors affecting denitrification
  • 242. rates in experimental wetlands: field and laboratory studies. Ecol Eng 26:167–181 Smith VH, Joye SB, Howarth RW (2006) Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 51:351–355 Strickland JD, Parsons TR (1972) A practical handbook of seawater analysis, vol 167, 2nd edn. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, pp 207–211 Sundbäck K, Miles A, Göransson E (2000) Nitrogen fluxes, denitrification and the role of microphytobenthos in mi- crotidal shallow-water sediments: an annual study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 200:59–76 Teiter S, Mander U (2005) Emission of N2O, N2, CH4, and CO2 from constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and from riparian buffer zones. Ecol Eng 25:528–541 Thamdrup B, Dalsgaard T (2002) Production of N2 through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to nitrate reduc- tion in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:
  • 243. 1312–1318 Tiedje JM (1988) Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York Toet S, Huibers LHFA, Richard SP, Verhoeven JTA (2003) Denitrification in the periphyton associated with plant shoots and in the sediment of a wetland system supplied with sewage treatment plant effluent. Hydrobiologia 501:29–44 Trimmer M, Nicholls JC, Deflandre B (2003) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation measured in sediments along the Thames Estuary, United Kingdom. Appl Environ Micro- biol 69:6447–6454 Trimmer M, Risgaard-Petersen N, Nicholls JC, Engstrom P (2006) Direct measurements of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) and denitrification in intact sedi- ment cores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 326:37–47 Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting MM (2006)
  • 244. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol Evol 21:96–103 Yoon WB, Benner R (1992) Denitrification and oxygen con- sumption in sediments of two south Texas estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 90:157–167 Yu K, DeLaune RD, Boeckx P (2006) Direct measurement of denitrification activity in a Gulf coast freshwater marsh receiving diverted Mississippi River water. Chemosphere 65:2449–2455 Zhou S, Hosomi M (2008) Nitrogen transformations and bal- ance in a constructed wetland for nutrient-polluted river water treatment using forage rice in Japan. Ecol Eng 32:147–155 354 Biogeochemistry (2011) 103:335–354 123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001074.x Copyright of Biogeochemistry is the property of Springer Science & Business Media B.V. and its content may
  • 245. not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. The influence of watershed characteristics on nitrogen export to and marine fate in Hood Canal, Washington, USA Peter D. Steinberg • Michael T. Brett • J. Scott Bechtold • Jeffrey E. Richey • Lauren M. Porensky • Suzanne N. Smith Received: 15 April 2009 / Accepted: 23 August 2010 / Published online: 21 October 2010 � Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Hood Canal, Washington, USA, is a poorly ventilated fjord-like sub-basin of Puget Sound that commonly experiences hypoxia. This study examined the influence of watershed soils, vegetation, physical features, and population density on nitrogen (N) export to Hood Canal from 43 tributaries. We also linked our watershed study to the estuary using a salinity mass
  • 246. balance model that calculated the relative magnitude of N loading to Hood Canal from watershed, direct precipitation, and marine sources. The overall flow- weighted total dissolved N (TDN) and particulate N input concentrations to Hood Canal were 152 and 49 lg l-1, respectively. Nitrate and dissolved organic N comprised 64 and 29% of TDN, respectively. The optimal regression models for TDN concentration and areal yield included a land cover term suggesting an effect of N-fixing red alder (Alnus rubra) and a human population density term (suggesting onsite septic system (OSS) discharges). There was pronounced seasonality in stream water TDN concentrations, particularly for catchments with a high prevalence of red alder, with the lowest concentrations occurring in the summer and the highest occurring in November– December. Due to strong seasonality in TDN concen- trations and in particular stream flow, over 60% of the
  • 247. TDN export from this watershed occurred during the 3 month period of November–January. Entrainment of marine water into the surface layer of Hood Canal accounted for &98% of N loading to the euphotic zone of this estuary, and in a worst case scenario OSS N inputs contribute &0.5% of total N loading. Domestic wastewater discharges and red alders appear to be a very important N source for many streams, but a minor nutrient source for the estuary as a whole. Keywords Hood Canal � Puget Sound � Stream chemistry � Nitrogen � Red alder � Onsite septic systems � Eutrophication � Hypoxia Introduction Since the Industrial Revolution, human activities have doubled the loading of mineralized nitrogen (N) to terrestrial ecosystems (Vitousek et al. 1997; P. D. Steinberg � M. T. Brett (&) � S. N. Smith Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700, USA e-mail: [email protected]
  • 248. J. S. Bechtold School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA J. E. Richey � L. M. Porensky School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Box 355351, Seattle, WA 98195-7940, USA P. D. Steinberg (&) GoldSim Technology Group, 300 NE Gilman Blvd, Suite 100, Issaquah, WA 98027-2941, USA e-mail: [email protected] 123 Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433 DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9521-7 Green et al. 2004). On a global scale the most significant anthropogenic inputs to the reactive N cycle include fertilizers, wastewater discharges, urban/ suburban runoff, and NOx and NH3 loading to the atmospheric from fossil fuel combustion and agricul-
  • 249. ture (Vitousek et al. 1997; Paerl et al. 2002; Galloway et al. 2004). Excessive terrestrial N loading can lead to soil N saturation, decreased tree productivity, enhanced N leaching into surface and groundwaters (Fenn et al. 1998), and in some cases dramatically increased loading to receiving lakes, rivers and estu- aries (Howarth et al. 1996; Boyer et al. 2006). Intact conifer-dominated watersheds are usually N limited (Sollins et al. 1980; Triska et al. 1984; Hedin et al. 1995), discharge proportionally more dissolved organic than inorganic N (Perakis and Hedin 2002), and have low areal N yields (Perakis and Hedin 2002; Cairns and Lajtha 2005). Areas subjected to timber harvest and other disturbances are often re-colonized by early successional nitrogen-fixing species such as alder (Alnus spp.). Red alder (Alnus rubra), a prevalent deciduous tree in the Pacific northwest region of North America, can fix 100–200 kg N ha
  • 250. -1 year -1 (Binkley et al. 1994). Since alders often grow in riparian areas adjacent to surface and subsurface flow paths, high soil and litterfall N concentrations can lead to increased stream water N concentrations (Hurd et al. 2001; Compton et al. 2003; Hurd and Raynal 2004). Increased stream water N yields due to alders have been noted in the coastal range of Oregon (Compton et al. 2003), the Olympic Peninsula in Washington (Bechtold et al. 2003), the Adirondack Mountains in New York (Hurd et al. 2001; Hurd and Raynal 2004), forests of Wisconsin (Younger and Kapustka 1983), and fens in Germany (Busse and Gunkel 2002). Our study was initiated as part of a broader effort to understand hypoxic events and associated fish-kills in Hood Canal. Hood Canal is an N-limited, deep,
  • 251. stratified fjord-like sub-basin of the Puget Sound estuary with a shallow sill blocking deep-water tidal exchange at its marine boundary (Newton et al. 1995). Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in the deep waters of Hood Canal decline during the summer due to strong density stratification and the settling/decomposition of phytoplankton from the euphotic zone, and low summer/fall DO concen- trations have been observed since the 1950s (Collias et al. 1974). Nearly all of the lower reaches of the Hood Canal watershed have been logged or cleared at least once, and are dominated by red alders. Further- more, while population density in the Hood Canal watershed is quite low, i.e., 20 individuals km-2, much of the population is concentrated along the shorelines, and all domestic wastewater discharges within the watershed are treated by on-site septic (OSS) systems.
  • 252. The overall objectives of our study were to determine the loading of dissolved nitrogen by source into Hood Canal, and to assess that loading relative to marine sources. We examined the extent to which watershed characteristics (e.g., soils, land cover, physical features and population density) predict stream water N concentrations and nutrient export to Hood Canal from its tributaries. We then linked the watershed to the Canal, using a salinity mass balance to estimate marine upwelling flows, and assessed the magnitudes of watershed N export to the surface mixed layer of Hood Canal relative to marine sources (i.e., estuarine circulation). Study area The Hood Canal (Fig. 1) watershed has a surface area of *3,050 km2, of which Hood Canal itself comprises 12%. The watershed can be separated into three zones: (1) the large snowmelt dominated catchments of the Olympic Mountains, (2) the Skokomish River, and (3)
  • 253. the many smaller rain dominated catchments of the Kitsap Peninsula and Hood Canal lowlands. Dominant land uses/covers in the lowland catchments are re-growth conifer, deciduous mixed forests, and sub- urban and semi-rural development (Table 1). Areas mapped as deciduous mixed forest usually have a closed upper canopy that is composed of ca. 50% red alder (L. Porensky, unpubl. data). The upper elevations are within the Olympic National Park and are nearly pristine conifer forests. The middle elevations are part of Olympic National Forest, 76% of which has been logged (Peterson et al. 1997). The lowland catchments have more disturbance from forest clearing, wetland draining and suburban development. In this watershed, over 60% of precip- itation occurs between November and January and less than 10% occurs between June and August. Freshwater inputs to Hood Canal averaged 170 m
  • 254. 3 s -1 during the water years 1990 to 2006. The first study year (i.e., 2005) was somewhat drier than average, whereas 2005 416 Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433 123 Fig. 1 Map showing the location of the 43 sampled tributaries in the Hood Canal watershed, Washington Table 1 Physical characteristics, and land cover and soil types for the five regions of the Hood Canal watershed Skokomish River a Diversion from
  • 255. North Fork Skokomish Other Olympic Mountain catchments Sampled Kitsap/lowland catchments Unsampled Kitsap/lowland catchments Physical characteristics Catchment area (km 2 ) 375 254 985 578 618 Mean elevation (m) 428 808 543 186 118 Average slope (%) 40.2 52.9 44.0 14.8 17.1 Average discharge (1990–2006) (m 3 s
  • 256. -1 ) 37.6 21.9 69.5 19.6 20.7 Average runoff (1990–2006) (m year -1 ) 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.1 1.1 Population density (people km -2 ) 3.6 3.8 3.8 20 45 Land cover Mature coniferous forest (%) 46.4 58.3 49.9 41.3 23.7 Deciduous mixed forest (%) 8.8 3.8 7.3 16.9 29.3 Grass/shrubs/crops/early regrowth (%) 8.6 5.3 7.6 8.1 9.4 Young coniferous forest (%) 9.7 3.6 7.9 13.3 15.1 Low and high density urban (%) 1.4 0.9 1.3 2.2 4.6 Soil types Entisols (weakly developed soils) not derived from till 41.3 64.5 45.3 38.3 51.0 Soils influenced by ash (andic soils
  • 257. and andisols) 56.2 45.4 53.0 6.5 15.1 Soils derived from glacial till 13.8 12.5 13.4 49.5 29.7 Rock outcrops 6.4 14.4 8.8 0.1 0.0 a Skokomish River does not include that area of the North Fork Skokomish River upstream of upstream of Cushman Dam Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433 417 123 was the wettest year in the last 50. Average annual runoff ranges from 3.2 m year -1 in the Skokomish River catchment to 1.1 m year -1 in the lowlands (Table 1). The mountainous areas of the watershed are sparsely populated (i.e., &4 people km-2), and the lowlands have moderate population densities (&20 people km-2) with areas of higher population
  • 258. density along the shoreline especially within Lynch Cove (Table 1). Methods Basin attributes A USGS 30 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM) was used to create the stream network, delineate catchment boundaries, and calculate watershed areas, mean elevation and slope. Soils data (SSURGO 2006) were used to construct a soil matrix of chemical and physical characteristics and taxonomic information for each soil type. Land cover was classified, via a supervised classification of a 30 m resolution Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM?) image from July 30, 2000 (NASA Landsat Program 2001), with at least 10 ground-truth reference sites used for each the land cover type. Urban areas were masked based on their location in the PRISM 2002 landcover map (Alberti
  • 259. et al. 2004), and subalpine forests were masked based on their proximity to snow-covered areas. To estimate this land cover classification’s accuracy, 100 randomly located test points were referenced against aerial photographs from 2003, which sug- gested that the final product had a classification accuracy of [90%. Population estimates for each catchment were generated by disaggregating 2000 US Census block data using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) scores (sensu Imhoff et al. 2000; Koh et al. 2006), derived from the previously mentioned Land- sat image. The PRISM 2002 land cover classification was used to subdivide the original NDVI raster into three component rasters, including areas expected to have zero population (e.g., steep slopes), suburban areas (with 90% of the population) and rural areas (with 10% of the population). Within the suburban and rural rasters, the population for each census block
  • 260. was divided among individual pixels based on the difference between each pixel’s NDVI value and the mean NDVI value of the census block. Field and laboratory procedures Forty-three streams, accounting for 88% of the overall watershed’s hydrologic yield, were sampled monthly from January 2005 to December 2006. The unsampled areas of the watershed (which accounted for 22% of the surface area and 12% of the hydrologic yield) consisted of small, undifferentiated shoreline catchments. Grab samples were collected in 0.1 M HCl acid-washed bottles pre-rinsed with streamwater. Dissolved nutrient samples (NO3 - , NH4 ? ) were filtered through What- man �
  • 261. cellulose acetate filters (0.45 lm pore size), and analyzed on an Alpkem RFA/2 autoanalyzer. TDN was measured on a Shimadzu DOC analyzer after filtering through pre-combusted Whatman � GF/F glass fiber filters (0.7 lm). For particulates, 100–600 ml of stream water, depending on turbidity, was filtered through GF/F filters. Particulates captured on the filters were dried at 55�C for 24 h, acid-fumigated for 24 h, re-dried at 55�C, and packed in tin capsules. The samples were analyzed for N and C concentration at the UC-Davis Stable Isotope Facility using a PDZEuropa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer. Streamflow estimation Fourteen of the 43 streams, which accounted for 68% of the total watershed area, including all large Olympic Mountain rivers, had daily mean flow records. The ungaged areas were narrow shoreline catchments and small to medium size tributaries entirely within the lowlands. Streamflows for the ungaged catchments
  • 262. were estimated by classifying each drainage by hydro- climatic region and then applying the mean of the areal daily runoff rates for a particular region. Loading rates Monthly freshwater dissolved nutrient loads to Hood Canal were estimated by multiplying the monthly mean streamflows by the actual monthly grab sample concentrations for the 39 sampling sites that were direct discharges (i.e., not upstream of other sample locations) to Hood Canal accordingly: Loading = P monthly conc. 9 mean monthly flow 9 30.4. The flow-weighted mean concentrations were used 418 Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:415–433 123 as the response variable in regression models, these were calculated accordingly; flow-weighted concen-
  • 263. tration = P monthly conc. 9 mean monthly flow/ P mean monthly flow. To fill-in missing data we used the three streams which had the most similar monthly patterns com- pared to the stream with the missing data to generate regression based estimates for the missing value and we then took the average of these estimates to represent the missing data. Before the fill-in process, the 24-month by 43-stream dissolved constituent concentration matrices were 78% complete. The monthly arithmetic mean of concentrations measured in the four most populated Kitsap watersheds (Big Beef, Seabeck, Tahuya, and Union) were used to estimate each month’s concentration for the unsam- pled portions of the Hood Canal watershed. These streams had average population densities (49 peo-