This chart book aims to help readers understand Illinois’ overall economy and tax system from a broad perspective. It also provides detailed illustrations of each of Illinois’ major tax types—individual income taxes, business taxes, sales and excise taxes, and property taxes—to help make the complicated task of understanding the state’s tax code a bit easier.
Iowa Illustrated: A Visual Guide to Taxes & the EconomyTax Foundation
The Tax Foundation's new book Iowa Illustrated: A Visual Guide to Taxes & the Economy shows why tax reform should be on the minds of Iowan policymakers and taxpayers. Featuring in-depth research and analysis from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, and commissioned by the Future of Iowa Foundation, Iowa Illustrated provides reporters, legislators, and taxpayers with an in-depth look at the make-up of Iowa’s tax code and its growing economy.
Here are just a few examples of the more than 30 key findings:
-Iowa relies on federal funding for one-third of its budget
-Iowa’s sales tax rate has tripled since its creation
-Iowa’s business taxes rank poorly nationally, and are uncompetitive regionally
-Iowa has had a net loss of 63,287 people over the last 20 years
-Effective tax rates in Iowa vary widely across different industries.
By offering a broader perspective of Iowa’s taxes and illustrating some of the lesser-known aspects of Iowa’s business environment, this guide provides the necessary facts for having an honest debate about how to improve the structure of The Hawkeye State’s tax system.
Taxes are complicated. Every city and state’s tax code is a multifaceted system with many moving parts, and San Diego is no exception. This chart book, the result of collaboration between the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Tax Foundation, aims to help readers understand San Diego’s overall economy and tax system from a broad perspective. It also provides detailed information about San Diego’s public finances as compared to other cities in order to ease the complicated task of understanding the city’s tax climate.
Over the past forty years, San Diego’s population has doubled. Although employment growth has been weaker over the same period, wages have risen above the national average for more than a decade. Furthermore, San Diego is a destination city for highly skilled labor.
In terms of government finance, San Diego performs well. Not only does the city have a smaller government than those of competitor cities, it also has low spending and very low debt. Taxes per capita have also decreased in recent years. However, San Diego relies less on local property and sales taxes, which means it must lean more on distortionary business and excise taxes.
Despite these local successes, California continues to be a drag on San Diego’s economic performance. Taxes in the state are high and poorly structured. Tax burdens and rates alike have risen over time. The general tax climate is a deterrent for businesses. In sum, California’s tax code makes it hard for San Diego to compete.
Each piece of San Diego’s economic climate tells a story. While taxes are complicated, we hope this book will help put those dynamic pieces together to provide an in-depth picture of San Diego’s tax climate. Our hope is that this resource for Chamber members, business owners, policymakers, and the general public will inform ways to improve the tax system and improve San Diego’s business climate.
These charts were developed by San Diego Regional Chamber and Tax Foundation staff and edited by economist Lyman Stone. We thank the County of San Diego for their investment in this invaluable resource for San Diego job creators.
Reform COVID19's Inequality to Avoid RevolutionsPaul H. Carr
COVID19 amplifies inequality, increasing tensions between poor Blacks, Whites, Police, and Immigrants. Economically disadvantaged Blacks joined by Whites are taking to the streets to demand reform. Economic inequality contributed to the French Revolution and to our Civil War, with the most casualties in our history.
We need reform to prevent revolutions. Karl Marx’s wrote his 1847 Communist Manifesto in response the newly rich industrialist’s exploitation of the poor workers in England. During this time, author Charles Dickens, as a boy, had to work ten-hour shifts pasting labels on bottles to support this family, because his father was confined in Debtor’s Prison.
In 1917,Trotsky led the Communist Revolution in Russia that ousted the Tsars’ monarchy. In 1924 Stalin emerged as the leader of the USSR. After WWII, the US fought the Korean and Vietnam Wars to stop the Communists from overrunning the world.
The rich, miserly Scrooge in Charles Dickens’ “Christmas Carol” underwent a conversion to a generous person who celebrated Christmas. In contrast to the Communist revolution, this can be a metaphor for the rule of law that enabled the US to overcome worker exploitation. The US passed child, labor, and anti-trust laws that constrained the power of the rich industrialists.
Since the 1980s, hourly worker pay has not increased in proportion to inflation and increased productivity. This disparity is increasing economic inequality. Most of the increased productivity pay has gone to those with education beyond a bachelor’s degree.
The minimum federal pay of $7.25 per hour has not been increased for over a decade. To keep up with inflation and productivity increases, the minimum wage should be gradually advanced to $ 20 per hour. Recently the minimum wage in Washington, DC increased to $14 per hour.
The property tax that funds public schools results in poor neighborhoods having poor schools and rich neighborhoods having good schools. State, federal, and corporate funds are needed to keep poor kids from being locked into poverty. Our high tech civilization needs an educated workforce. Let’s educate our poor rather than import educated immigrants. We must also reform our tax structure and corporate policies.
This presentation on privatization and TIFs was given to Theresa Amato's public interest law class at the Loyola Law School. The audio is 47 minutes long. If you'd like a copy, please email tom@civiclab.us.
Let's have a discussion about capitalism and socialism. This slideshare makes the case that what we need is more capitalism as it is the system that reduces poverty and actually delivers a better overall quality of life. Yes, there are improvements that can be made, but let's have that discussion before we make revolutionary changes that have not worked well in other places.
Housing and the Economy: Impacts and Forecasts - presented by Dr. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Director - Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL), University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs
Iowa Illustrated: A Visual Guide to Taxes & the EconomyTax Foundation
The Tax Foundation's new book Iowa Illustrated: A Visual Guide to Taxes & the Economy shows why tax reform should be on the minds of Iowan policymakers and taxpayers. Featuring in-depth research and analysis from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, and commissioned by the Future of Iowa Foundation, Iowa Illustrated provides reporters, legislators, and taxpayers with an in-depth look at the make-up of Iowa’s tax code and its growing economy.
Here are just a few examples of the more than 30 key findings:
-Iowa relies on federal funding for one-third of its budget
-Iowa’s sales tax rate has tripled since its creation
-Iowa’s business taxes rank poorly nationally, and are uncompetitive regionally
-Iowa has had a net loss of 63,287 people over the last 20 years
-Effective tax rates in Iowa vary widely across different industries.
By offering a broader perspective of Iowa’s taxes and illustrating some of the lesser-known aspects of Iowa’s business environment, this guide provides the necessary facts for having an honest debate about how to improve the structure of The Hawkeye State’s tax system.
Taxes are complicated. Every city and state’s tax code is a multifaceted system with many moving parts, and San Diego is no exception. This chart book, the result of collaboration between the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Tax Foundation, aims to help readers understand San Diego’s overall economy and tax system from a broad perspective. It also provides detailed information about San Diego’s public finances as compared to other cities in order to ease the complicated task of understanding the city’s tax climate.
Over the past forty years, San Diego’s population has doubled. Although employment growth has been weaker over the same period, wages have risen above the national average for more than a decade. Furthermore, San Diego is a destination city for highly skilled labor.
In terms of government finance, San Diego performs well. Not only does the city have a smaller government than those of competitor cities, it also has low spending and very low debt. Taxes per capita have also decreased in recent years. However, San Diego relies less on local property and sales taxes, which means it must lean more on distortionary business and excise taxes.
Despite these local successes, California continues to be a drag on San Diego’s economic performance. Taxes in the state are high and poorly structured. Tax burdens and rates alike have risen over time. The general tax climate is a deterrent for businesses. In sum, California’s tax code makes it hard for San Diego to compete.
Each piece of San Diego’s economic climate tells a story. While taxes are complicated, we hope this book will help put those dynamic pieces together to provide an in-depth picture of San Diego’s tax climate. Our hope is that this resource for Chamber members, business owners, policymakers, and the general public will inform ways to improve the tax system and improve San Diego’s business climate.
These charts were developed by San Diego Regional Chamber and Tax Foundation staff and edited by economist Lyman Stone. We thank the County of San Diego for their investment in this invaluable resource for San Diego job creators.
Reform COVID19's Inequality to Avoid RevolutionsPaul H. Carr
COVID19 amplifies inequality, increasing tensions between poor Blacks, Whites, Police, and Immigrants. Economically disadvantaged Blacks joined by Whites are taking to the streets to demand reform. Economic inequality contributed to the French Revolution and to our Civil War, with the most casualties in our history.
We need reform to prevent revolutions. Karl Marx’s wrote his 1847 Communist Manifesto in response the newly rich industrialist’s exploitation of the poor workers in England. During this time, author Charles Dickens, as a boy, had to work ten-hour shifts pasting labels on bottles to support this family, because his father was confined in Debtor’s Prison.
In 1917,Trotsky led the Communist Revolution in Russia that ousted the Tsars’ monarchy. In 1924 Stalin emerged as the leader of the USSR. After WWII, the US fought the Korean and Vietnam Wars to stop the Communists from overrunning the world.
The rich, miserly Scrooge in Charles Dickens’ “Christmas Carol” underwent a conversion to a generous person who celebrated Christmas. In contrast to the Communist revolution, this can be a metaphor for the rule of law that enabled the US to overcome worker exploitation. The US passed child, labor, and anti-trust laws that constrained the power of the rich industrialists.
Since the 1980s, hourly worker pay has not increased in proportion to inflation and increased productivity. This disparity is increasing economic inequality. Most of the increased productivity pay has gone to those with education beyond a bachelor’s degree.
The minimum federal pay of $7.25 per hour has not been increased for over a decade. To keep up with inflation and productivity increases, the minimum wage should be gradually advanced to $ 20 per hour. Recently the minimum wage in Washington, DC increased to $14 per hour.
The property tax that funds public schools results in poor neighborhoods having poor schools and rich neighborhoods having good schools. State, federal, and corporate funds are needed to keep poor kids from being locked into poverty. Our high tech civilization needs an educated workforce. Let’s educate our poor rather than import educated immigrants. We must also reform our tax structure and corporate policies.
This presentation on privatization and TIFs was given to Theresa Amato's public interest law class at the Loyola Law School. The audio is 47 minutes long. If you'd like a copy, please email tom@civiclab.us.
Let's have a discussion about capitalism and socialism. This slideshare makes the case that what we need is more capitalism as it is the system that reduces poverty and actually delivers a better overall quality of life. Yes, there are improvements that can be made, but let's have that discussion before we make revolutionary changes that have not worked well in other places.
Housing and the Economy: Impacts and Forecasts - presented by Dr. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Director - Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL), University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs
The collective wealth of New York’s 120 billionaires jumped by $156.3 billion, or 30 percent, between mid-March of last year and this year, according to new data from Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies compiled by the Strong Economy For All Coalition, the Fund Excluded Workers Coalition and the Invest in Our New York campaign.
The $156.3 billion in pandemic profits of the state’s richest residents could cover the state’s projected $15 billion budget gap ten times over and still leave them wealthier than they were when the pandemic hit a year ago.
Cordes & Longworth Chicago Tribune Op Ed | April 14, 2015Ed Morrison
Sam Cordes and Richard Longworth did an excellent job outlining how the governors of Illinois and Indiana are moving in the wrong direction.
In an op-ed that appeared in the Chicago Tribune, they pointed to our work in building the Regional Alliance across three states: WI, IL and IN.
Housing and the Economy: Impacts and Forecasts - Illinois Association of REALTORS® January 2013 Public Policy Meetings - Presented by Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Ph.D. Director, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL)
University of Illinois, Institute of Government and Public Affairs
I upload all my TIF presentations to http://www.slideshare.net/tomtee. These presentations have been viewed over 44,000 times! The champ is the presentation on the 27th ward which has been viewed 4,292 times. So - if you are one of the people whose viewed these presentations and found them valuable - PLEASE support our work by (1) signing our email list at http://tinyurl.com/SignUp-CivicLab, (2) consider renting a desk with us (we're in Chicago's West Loop), and (3) making a deducible contribution via our fiscal agent, the Investigative News Network - http://tinyurl.com/SupportTheLab-INN. We are online at http://www.tifreports.com. Contact me - tom@civiclab.us.
The collective wealth of New York’s 120 billionaires jumped by $156.3 billion, or 30 percent, between mid-March of last year and this year, according to new data from Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies compiled by the Strong Economy For All Coalition, the Fund Excluded Workers Coalition and the Invest in Our New York campaign.
The $156.3 billion in pandemic profits of the state’s richest residents could cover the state’s projected $15 billion budget gap ten times over and still leave them wealthier than they were when the pandemic hit a year ago.
Cordes & Longworth Chicago Tribune Op Ed | April 14, 2015Ed Morrison
Sam Cordes and Richard Longworth did an excellent job outlining how the governors of Illinois and Indiana are moving in the wrong direction.
In an op-ed that appeared in the Chicago Tribune, they pointed to our work in building the Regional Alliance across three states: WI, IL and IN.
Housing and the Economy: Impacts and Forecasts - Illinois Association of REALTORS® January 2013 Public Policy Meetings - Presented by Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Ph.D. Director, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (REAL)
University of Illinois, Institute of Government and Public Affairs
I upload all my TIF presentations to http://www.slideshare.net/tomtee. These presentations have been viewed over 44,000 times! The champ is the presentation on the 27th ward which has been viewed 4,292 times. So - if you are one of the people whose viewed these presentations and found them valuable - PLEASE support our work by (1) signing our email list at http://tinyurl.com/SignUp-CivicLab, (2) consider renting a desk with us (we're in Chicago's West Loop), and (3) making a deducible contribution via our fiscal agent, the Investigative News Network - http://tinyurl.com/SupportTheLab-INN. We are online at http://www.tifreports.com. Contact me - tom@civiclab.us.
IAR Public Policy Meetings, January 26, 2011.
Presented by Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Director, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory - University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs
Fiscal Austerity & the Federal System (Paul Posner, 2013 ABFM Conf)PublicFinanceTV
"Fiscal Austerity & the Federal System" presentation by Paul Posner, George Mason Unviersity, presented during "Sequestration's Impact on State Budgets" plenary session, 2013 ABFM Annual Conference, October 3, 2013
" The lower one’s income, the higher one’s overall effective state and local tax rate. Combining all state and local income, property, sales and excise taxes that Americans pay, the nationwide average effective state and local tax rates by income group are 10.9 percent for the poorest 20 percent of individuals and families, 9.4 percent for the middle 20 percent and 5.4 percent for the top 1 percent."
Presentation drawn from my book, We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money, on how better fiscal policy can respond to surging top-end inequality, stagnant middle class incomes, and economic growth.
What Are Taxes And Best Benefits of File Taxes Each Year? 2023 | CIO Women Ma...CIOWomenMagazine
While we primarily consider them once a year during tax season, we deal with them often throughout the year. In addition to the benefits of file taxes on our income, we also have to pay taxes on the things we buy and the property we own. Total annual expenditures in the United States for these things add up to billions of dollars and include everything from Social Security and the military to garbage collection and park maintenance.
Thirty years of growing income inequality, corporate tax cuts and personal tax breaks for the wealthy have undermined the livelihood of working people and set up a state budget crisis which does not need to
exist. We present alternative tax proposals and issue a warning of the ominous consequences of privatization, layoffs and state service cuts for all New Yorkers.
August 4, 2011 TAX FLIGHT IS A MYTH Higher State .docxtarifarmarie
August 4, 2011
TAX FLIGHT IS A MYTH
Higher State Taxes Bring More Revenue, Not More Migration
By Robert Tannenwald, Jon Shure, and Nicholas Johnson1
Executive Summary
Attacks on sorely-needed increases in state tax revenues often include the unproven claim that tax
hikes will drive large numbers of households — particularly the most affluent — to other states.
The same claim also is used to justify new tax cuts. Compelling evidence shows that this claim is
false. The effects of tax increases on migration are, at most, small — so small that states that raise
income taxes on the most affluent households can be assured of a substantial net gain in revenue.
The basic facts, as this report explains, are as follows:
Migration is not common. Most people have strong ties to their current state, such as job,
home, family, friends, and community. On average, just 1.7 percent of U.S. residents moved
from one state to another per year between 2001 and 2010, and only about 30 percent of those
born in the United States change their state of residence over the course of their entire lifetime.
And when people do relocate, a large body of scholarly evidence shows that they do so
primarily for new jobs, cheaper housing, or a better climate. A person’s age, education, marital
status, and a host of other factors also affect decisions about moving.
The migration that’s occurring is much more likely to be driven by cheaper housing
than by lower taxes. A family might be able to cut its taxes by a few percentage points by
moving from one state to another, but housing costs are far more variable. The difference
between housing costs in two different states is often many times greater than the difference in
taxes. So what might look like migration in search of lower taxes is really often migration for
cheaper housing.
Consider Florida, often claimed as a state that attracts households because of its low taxes
(Florida has no income tax). In the latter half of the 2000s, the previously rapid influx of U.S.
migrants into Florida slowed and then reversed — Florida actually started losing population.
The state enacted no tax policy change that can explain this reversal. What did change was
1 Dylan Grundman, Anna Kawar, Eleni Orphinades, and Ashali Singham contributed to this report.
820 First Street NE, Suite 510
Washington, DC 20002
Tel: 202-408-1080
Fax: 202-408-1056
[email protected]
www.cbpp.org
2
housing prices. Previously, the state’s lower housing prices had enabled Northeastern
homeowners to increase their personal wealth by selling their pricey houses and purchasing a
comparable or better home in Florida at a lower price. But housing prices in Florida rose
sharply during the mid-2000s, narrowing opportunities for Northeasterners to “trade up” on
their expensive homes. And consider California: its loss of househ.
Tom Tresser presented at a forum of privatization and the Chicago Infrastructure Trust at SEIU's Chicago HQ on Saturday, June 23, 2012. Visit http://www.civiclab.us. Contact Tom = tom@civiclab.us
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
7. v
Taxes are complicated. Each state’s tax code is a multifaceted
system with many moving parts, and Illinois is no exception.
This chart book aims to help readers understand Illinois’
overall economy and tax system from a broad perspective. It
also provides detailed illustrations of each of Illinois’ major tax
types—individual income taxes, business taxes, sales and excise
taxes, and property taxes—to help make the complicated task of
understanding the state’s tax code a bit easier.
These charts were compiled by Tax Foundation staff and edited
by economist Liz Malm.
Joseph Henchman
Vice President, Legal & State Projects
Tax Foundation
Carol Portman
President
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois
Introduction
Illinois State Fair, photo: Katherine Johnson
8. vi
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: An Overview of the Illinois Economy 1
Illinois’ Income per Person Is High but Converging with U.S. and Neighbors’ Levels 2
Illinois’ Metro Income Tends to Be Higher than Non-Metro 3
Illinois Has One of the Largest State Economies in the Country 4
Metro-Area Employment in Illinois Is Very Different from Non-Metro 5
Illinois’ Economy Is Moving away from Goods and toward Services 6
Professional & Business Services, Private Education & Health Services,
and Government Employ the Most People in Illinois 7
Illinois Has Seen Consistent Out-Migration over the Last 20 Years 8
Unemployment Rate in Illinois Tends to Be Higher than the U.S. Rate 9
Chapter 2: Illinois’ Tax Code: The Basics 10
Illinois Taxes at a Glance 11
State Tax Collections Have Grown Faster than Local Collections 12
Compared to the Entire U.S., Illinois Relies More on Property Taxes, Less on Sales Taxes 13
Corporate Income Taxes Are Illinois’ Most Volatile State Tax 14
Illinois, like All States, Relies Heavily on Federal Aid 15
Illinois’ Business Tax Climate Is Middle-of-the-Pack 16
Illinois’ Business Tax Climate Falls behind Most Neighboring States 17
Illinois’ Tax Burden Ranks Higher than Most Other States’ Burdens 18
Illinois’ Tax Burden Is Now Higher than the U.S. Average 19
Illinois Has the Most Under-Funded Public Pensions in the Country 20
9. vii
Chapter 3: Individual Income Tax in Illinois 21
Illinois’ Individual Income Tax Rate Has Fluctuated over Time 22
Illinois’ Individual Income Tax Collections per Person over Time 23
How Does the Illinois Individual Income Tax Impact Real People? 24
Illinois Spent $4.35 Billion on Individual Income Tax Expenditures in 2013 26
Chapter 4: Business Taxes in Illinois 27
Businesses Don’t Just Pay Corporate Income Taxes 28
Businesses Pay Individual Income Taxes Too 29
Effective Tax Rates Vary Widely by Industry and Age of Firm 30
Corporate Income Tax Rate Has Fluctuated over Time 31
Corporate Income Tax Collections per Person Are Volatile 32
Illinois Is One of Only 18 States that Levies a Capital Stock Tax 33
Chapter 5: Sales Taxes in Illinois 34
Illinois Has the Highest Combined Average Sales Tax Rate among Its Neighbors 35
State-Level Sales Tax Rate Has Risen over Time 36
Illinois’ Sales Tax Applies to Less and Less of the Economy 37
Even with High Rates, Illinois Has Lower Sales Tax Collections per Person than the U.S. 38
Not All Sales Tax Expenditures Are Created Equal 39
10. viii
Chapter 6: Excise Taxes in Illinois 40
Illinois’ Total Excise Tax Collections per Person Are High 41
The Value of Illinois’ Gas Tax Has Declined over Time 42
Illinois’ State Excise Taxes on Cigarettes and Alcohol 43
Illinois Taxpayers Face High Wireless Service Taxes 44
Chapter 7: Property Taxes in Illinois 45
Illinois Has High Property Tax Collections per Person 46
Illinois’ Residential Effective Property Tax Rates Are Comparatively High 47
Residential Effective Property Tax Rates Vary Widely among Counties 48
Illinois Had 5,976 Different Taxing Districts in 2012 49
11. 1
An Overview of the
Illinois Economy
CHAPTER 1
The following charts illustrate the current state of the Illinois
economy, in addition to how it has fared over time. We show
various economic indicators, including personal income
per person, state gross domestic product, industry mix,
employment composition, migration, and unemployment.
Illinois Soybean Farm, photo: Kevin Dooley
12. 2 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois’ Income per Person Is High but Converging with U.S. and
Neighbors’ Levels
Personal Income per Capita as a Percent of the U.S. Level, Illinois and Neighboring States (1929-2013)
Historically, Illinois’ personal income per person has been above both the U.S. level and
the levels of neighboring states (except for a brief blip in the early 1940s). In recent years,
however, Illinois and other states have seen a convergence in relative income per capita.
In 1929, Illinois’ personal income per person sat at 136 percent of the U.S. level, with
all neighboring states trailing. By 2013, the gap between Illinois and its neighbors had
decreased substantially as Illinois’ per person income declined to 105 percent of the U.S.
average.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional
Economic Accounts, Annual State Personal Income and
Employment.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009
Illinois Michigan
Indiana Missouri
Iowa Wisconsin
Kentucky
U.S. Level
13. CHAPTER 1 | 3
Illinois’ Metro Income Tends to Be Higher than Non-Metro
Personal Income per Capita, Metro and Non-Metro Illinois (1969-2013)
As in other states, personal income per capita levels are not uniform throughout Illinois.
Metro-area income per person tends to be higher than non-metro-area income. This is likely
a result of the differing industry makeups of metro versus non-metro Illinois. However,
incomes tend to grow at the same rate in both areas over the long run. Notably, non-metro
incomes showed more resilience during the most recent recession.
Note: Counties designated by the Bureau of Economic
Analysis as metropolitan are Alexander, Bond, Boone,
Calhoun, Champaign, Clinton, Cook, DeKalb, DeWitt,
DuPage, Ford, Grundy, Henry, Jackson, Jersey, Kane,
Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, McLean, Macon,
Macoupin, Madison, Marshall, Menard, Mercer, Monroe,
Peoria, Piatt, Rock Island, St. Clair, Sangamon, Stark,
Tazewell, Vermilion, Will, Williamson, Winnebago, and
Woodford.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional
Economic Accounts, Local Area Personal Income and
Employment.
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009
Metro
Non-Metro
14. 4 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Has One of the Largest State Economies in the Country
State Gross Domestic Product, Select States (2013)
Illinois has one of the largest economies in the country (fifth largest based on state GDP)
and is outranked only by California, Texas, New York, and Florida. All of Illinois’ neighbors,
however, have considerably smaller economies. Much of this difference is driven by the large
urban center of Chicago, the third largest city in the United States. The fact that Illinois is
a large, populous state surrounded by smaller-economy states puts it in a unique regional
position.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional
Economic Analysis, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by
State, “GDP in current dollars.”
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
California Texas New York Florida Illinois Indiana Wisconsin Missouri Kentucky Iowa
Trillions
Top 5 Largest State Economies
States Neighboring Illinois
U.S. Rank:
5
2
3
4
1
16 20
30
22
28
15. CHAPTER 1 | 5
Metro-Area Employment in Illinois Is Very Different from
Non-Metro
Industry Employment as a Percent of Total Area Employment, Metro and Non-Metro Illinois (2013)
State economies are diverse, and different
areas of a state often have unique local
economies, something that can be seen by
comparing the largest sectors (based on the
share of area total employment) in metro
versus non-metro Illinois.
For example, agriculture makes up 10.2
percent of Illinois’ non-metro employment
but only 0.5 percent of metro-area
employment. Similarly, while manufacturing,
retail, and state and local government are
prominent in both areas, these sectors make
up a larger share of employment in non-
metro areas of the state.
0.5%
6.7%
7.4%
2.2%
4.0%
2.9%
1.7%
6.8%
11.5%
1.6%
1.6%
7.6%
0.2%
6.0%
7.6%
3.8%
9.3%
9.7%
4.3%
0.3%
4.3%
10.2%
5.9%
3.7%
1.2%
4.8%
1.0%
1.1%
5.1%
11.1%
1.2%
0.3%
11.3%
2.3%
6.3%
2.9%
2.5%
11.0%
13.0%
4.4%
0.7%
3.7%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%
Agriculture, Forestry, & Fishing
Accommodation & Food Services
Administrative & Support Services
Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation
Construction
Educational Services
Federal Government
Finance & Insurance
Healthcare & Social Assistance
Information
Management
Manufacturing
Mining
Other Services (Except Government)
Professional, Scientific, & Technical Services
Real Estate
Retail Trade
State & Local Government
Transportation & Warehousing
Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Metro
Non-Metro
Note: Counties designated by the Bureau of Economic
Analysis as metropolitan are Alexander, Bond, Boone,
Calhoun, Champaign, Clinton, Cook, DeKalb, DeWitt,
DuPage, Ford, Grundy, Henry, Jackson, Jersey, Kane,
Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, McLean, Macon,
Macoupin, Madison, Marshall, Menard, Mercer, Monroe,
Peoria, Piatt, Rock Island, St. Clair, Sangamon, Stark,
Tazewell, Vermilion, Will, Williamson, Winnebago, and
Woodford.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional
Economic Accounts, Local Area Personal Income and
Employment.
16. 6 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois’ Economy Is Moving away from Goods and toward Services
Services and Goods as a Percent of Total Private State GDP, Illinois Statewide (1963-2013)
Five decades ago, economic sectors involving the production of tangible goods—agriculture,
manufacturing, construction, and mining—made up approximately 40 percent of the Illinois
economy (based on the share of state GDP). Today, those sectors only comprise 20 percent
of the state’s economy, while service-providing industries make up the remaining 80 percent.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional
Economic Accounts, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by
State, “GDP in current dollars.”
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013
Goods
Services
17. CHAPTER 1 | 7
Professional & Business Services, Private Education & Health
Services, and Government Employ the Most People in Illinois
Percent of Total Nonfarm Employment by Sector, Illinois Statewide (2013)
The majority of employees in Illinois work in
service-providing sectors. The professional
and business services sector employs the
greatest percentage of workers at 15.6
percent of all employees. Other large
employer industries include private-sector
education and health services firms (15.2
percent), state and local government
including public schools (12.5 percent), retail
businesses (10.5 percent), manufacturing
firms (10.2 percent), and leisure and
hospitality businesses (9.6 percent).
0.5%
3.4%
10.2%
0.4%
5.2%
10.5%
4%
1.7%
4.9%
1.3%
15.6%
15.2%
9.6%
3.6%
1.4%
12.5%
Natural
Resources
& Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Utilities
Wholesale
Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation
& Warehousing
Information
Finance
& Insurance
Real Estate,
Rental, & Leasing
Professional &
Business Services
Private Education
& Health Services
Leisure & Hospitality
Other Misc.
Services &
Unclassified
Federal
Government
State and Local
Government
Note: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census
of Employment and Wages (Illinois Statewide for
All establishment sizes, All Employees, Private
establishments).
18. 8 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Has Seen Consistent Out-Migration over the Last 20 Years
Migration to and from Illinois Based on the Number of Federal Tax Exemptions Claimed (1993-2011)
Since the early 1990s, Illinois has seen a net of 1,004,952 people leave the state, with
net out-migration occurring each and every year since then. While people move for many
reasons, this is still an important metric for a state to measure. Illinois has lost the most
people to Florida, Indiana, Wisconsin, Texas, and Arizona. It has gained the most people
from Michigan, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Source: Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Tax
Stats, “State-to-State Migration Data.”
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Into Illinois Out of Illinois
1992-19931993-19941994-19951995-19961996-19971997-19981998-19991999-20002000-20012001-20022002-20032003-20042004-20052005-20062006-20072007-20082008-20092009-20102010-2011
19. CHAPTER 1 | 9
Unemployment Rate in Illinois Tends to Be Higher than the U.S.
Rate
Monthly Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rate, Illinois and U.S. (1976-2014)
Since the early 1980s, Illinois’ unemployment rate has generally exceeded that of the U.S.,
except for a period in the mid-1990s. The rate in Illinois hit highs in the early 1980s (12.9
percent) and early 2010 (11.4 percent), both of which were significantly higher than the U.S.
rate at those times. As of December 2014, the Illinois rate still exceeded that of the U.S.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area
Unemployment Statistics.
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rate, Illinois and U.S. (1976-
Illinois
U.S.
20. 10
Illinois’ state and local governments rely on several types of
taxes to raise revenue. Property taxes, income taxes, and sales
taxes are well known, but other revenue sources include excise
taxes, the estate tax, a tax on capital stock (known as the
franchise tax), and funding from the federal government, among
others.
In general, Illinoisans face a high state and local tax burden.
Inflation-adjusted tax collections have risen over time, from
$17.4 billion in 1961 to $66.5 billion in 2011. The composition
of those collections has changed as well. The local share
of collections has become smaller, and the state share has
increased.
While the level of taxes levied matters, the structure of each tax
is equally important. Each tax type has pros and cons, and each
can contribute to or detract from a state’s overall tax climate.
Similarly, other budgetary issues, such as federal funding levels
and unfunded liabilities, should also be kept in mind when
evaluating a state’s revenue structure.
Illinois’ Tax Code: The
Basics
CHAPTER 2
Illinois State Capitol, photo: Jasperdo
21. CHAPTER 2 | 11
Illinois Taxes at a Glance
This page provides a brief, broad overview of tax rates, tax collections, and other basic
structural features of the Illinois tax system.
Note: All collections listed on this page are combined
state and local per capita collections for the 2012 fiscal
year. Income, federal aid, and state debt are for 2013.
Individual and corporate income tax rates are ranked
according to the top rate if a state has a graduated-rate
individual or corporate income tax. Since individual and
corporate income tax rates decreased at the beginning
of 2015, these changes are not yet reflected in the
individual and corporate income tax collections data
that is as of the 2012 fiscal year. Illinois corporations
face two separate income taxes: a regular corporate
income tax and a corporate income tax enacted to
replace the personal property tax. We present the
combined rate. “State debt” is defined as the total
outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year, as defined
by the Census Bureau.
Source: Tax Foundation, Facts & Figures 2015: How Does
Your State Compare?
Individual Income Tax
Number of brackets 1
Tax rate 3.75%
Tax rate rank 40
Tax base Federal adjusted
gross income with
modifications
Collections per capita $1,206
Collections rank 11
Property Tax
Collections per capita $1,985
Collections rank 10
Effective residential property
tax rate
2.32%
Effective rate rank 2
Sales Tax
State rate 6.25%
State + average local rate 8.19%
State + average local rank 10
Collections per capita $749
Collections rank 39
Corporate Income Tax
Number of brackets 1
Tax rate 7.75%
Tax rate rank 17
Collections per capita $272
Collections rank 7
Excise Taxes Rate Rank
Gasoline taxes and
fees
30.72¢
per gallon
15
Cigarette taxes $1.98
per pack
16
Spirits taxes $8.55
per gallon
14
Wine taxes $1.39
per gallon
11
Beer taxes $0.23
per gallon
26
Cell phone taxes 15.81% 5
General Info Rank Nat. Avg.
Income per capita $46,980 16 $44,765
Federal aid as %
of gen. revenue
25.9% 40 30.0%
State debt per
capita
$4,944 6 $3,611
Other Taxes
Gross receipts tax None
Capital stock tax 0.10%
Inheritance tax None
Estate tax 0.8% - 16.0%
For all rankings on this page, 1 indicates the
highest rank among the 50 states.
22. 12 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
State Tax Collections Have Grown Faster than Local Collections
Illinois’ Combined State and Local Tax Collections (1961-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
Illinois’ inflation-adjusted total state and local tax collections have risen from approximately
$17.4 billion in 1961 to $66.5 billion in 2012. Since 1961, state tax collections have grown
from 39 percent of the combined total to 55 percent. Meanwhile, local tax collections have
decreased from 61 percent of the total to 45 percent.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these
years are connected with dotted lines. Chart shows
collections, not distributions.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances.
In 2011, individual and
corporate income tax
rates were increased.
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
Billions
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
State Tax Collections
Local Tax Collections
23. CHAPTER 2 | 13
Compared to the Entire U.S., Illinois Relies More on Property Taxes,
Less on Sales Taxes
Percent of Total Combined State and Local Tax Collections by Tax Type, Illinois and U.S. (2012)
Illinois obtained the largest share of state
and local combined collections in 2012 from
property taxes (38 percent of total), followed
by individual income taxes (23 percent)
and general sales taxes (15 percent). The
Illinois property tax share is higher than
the U.S. average, and the sales tax share is
lower. Corporate income taxes make up the
smallest share of collections in both Illinois
and the U.S. as a whole, although Illinois
relies on them a slightly more than other
states.
Corporate
Income Tax
5%
Corporate
Income Tax
3%
Other Taxes
6%
Other Taxes
8%
Property Taxes
38%
Individual
Income Tax
23%
Excise
Taxes
13%
Sales Taxes
15%
Property
Taxes
32%
Individual
Income Tax
22%
Excise
Taxes
13%
Sales
Taxes
23%
Illinois
All States
Note: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances.
24. 14 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Corporate Income Taxes Are Illinois’ Most Volatile State Tax
Annual Percent Change in Illinois’ State Tax Collections by Tax Type (1978-2012)
Revenue stability over the business cycle is an important facet of state tax policy. Different
types of taxes react differently to changes in the economy. In Illinois, corporate income taxes
fluctuate the most, followed by individual income and sales taxes.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances.
25. CHAPTER 2 | 15
Illinois, like All States, Relies Heavily on Federal Aid
Federal Funding as a Percent of State Government General Revenues (FY 2013)
While state and local taxes are a large component of state revenue toolkits, federal transfers
are also surprisingly sizeable. Illinois relied on federal funding for 25.9 percent of general
revenues in 2013, compared to the national average of 30.0 percent. Federal funding in
the states supports a variety of programs, including those related to public welfare, health,
education, and transportation.
Note: Figures are calculated by dividing the amount
of each state’s “intergovernmental revenues” from the
federal level to the state level by the state’s “general
revenue,” as estimated by the Census Bureau. General
revenue includes all taxes but excludes utility, liquor
store, and insurance trust revenue. DC is not included
because it is designated as a local jurisdiction.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances.
Higher
Percent
Lower
Percent
26. 16 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois’ Business Tax Climate Is Middle-of-the-Pack
Illinois Ranks 31st out of 50 in the State Business Tax Climate Index (2015)
The State Business Tax Climate Index gauges how well-structured each state’s tax code is for
business. States that score well on the Index have broad bases and low rates, but Illinois has
narrow bases and high rates on many taxes. Illinois is ranked 31st in the country.
Note: A rank of 1 indicates the state’s tax system is
more favorable for business; a rank of 50 indicates
the state’s tax system is less favorable for business.
Snapshot date is July 1, 2014. DC’s rank does not affect
other states’ rankings, but the figure in parentheses
indicates where it would rank if included.
Source: Tax Foundation, 2015 State Business Tax Climate
Index.
VA
#27
NC
#16
SC
#37
GA
#36
FL
#5
AL
#28
MS
#18
TN
#15
KY
#26
OH
#44IN
#8
IL
#31
MO
#17
AR
#39
LA
#35
IA
#41
MN
#47
WI
#43 MI
#13
PA
#34
NY
#49
ME
#33
TX
#10
OK
#32
KS
#22
NE
#29
SD
#2
ND
#25
MT
#6
WY
#1
CO
#20
NM
#38
AZ
#23
UT
#9
NV
#3
ID
#19
OR
#12
WA
#11
CA
#48
AK
#4
HI
#30
WV
#21
#24
#45
#42
#50
#14
#40
(#45)
MA
RI
CT
NJ
DE
MD
DC
#46
VT
#7
NH
10 Best Business
Tax Climates
10 Worst Business
Tax Climates
27. CHAPTER 2 | 17
Overall
Rank
Corporate
Tax Rank
Individual
Income Tax Rank
Sales Tax
Rank
Unemployment
Insurance Tax Rank
Property
Tax Rank
Indiana 8 22 10 10 7 5
Michigan 13 10 14 7 47 27
Missouri 17 4 29 29 12 7
Kentucky 26 29 30 11 45 17
Illinois 31 47 11 34 38 44
Iowa 41 49 32 23 33 38
Wisconsin 43 33 43 14 27 31
Illinois’ Business Tax Climate Falls behind Most Neighboring States
State Business Tax Climate Index Rankings for Illinois and Neighboring States (2015)
Breaking the State Business Tax Climate Index into its subcomponents allows us to compare
the structure of each major tax type. Nearly all neighboring states have better corporate
tax codes than Illinois. However, many Illinois businesses file income taxes through the
individual income tax code, where Illinois scores relatively well compared to most of its
neighbors. Illinois scores poorly in terms of sales tax, unemployment insurance tax, and
property tax.
Note: A rank of 1 indicates the state’s tax system is
more favorable for business; a rank of 50 indicates
the state’s tax system is less favorable for business.
Snapshot date is July 1, 2014. Component rankings do
not average to the overall rank. States without a given
tax rank equally as number 1 in that component.
Source: Tax Foundation, 2015 State Business Tax Climate
Index.
28. 18 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois’ Tax Burden Ranks Higher than Most Other States’ Burdens
Total State-Local Tax Burden as a Percent of State Residents’ Income, Illinois and Neighboring States
(FY 2011)
Illinois’ total state-local tax burden is ranked
13th highest in the country and above
most of its neighbors. The average Illinois
taxpayer paid $4,658 in state and local
taxes in 2011, amounting to 10.2 percent
of state residents’ total income. Illinoisans
pay approximately 74 percent of their total
tax burden to state and local governments
in Illinois and pay the remaining share to
out-of-state jurisdictions.
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%
Missouri
Iowa
Indiana
Kentucky
Michigan
Illinois
Wisconsin
9.0%
9.3%
9.5%
9.5%
9.6%
10.2%
11.0%
Share of income
paid to own state
Share of income paid
to other states
Note: Total state-local tax burden includes all taxes
levied by state and local governments. For a full list of
taxes included, see Tax Foundation Working Paper No.
10.
Source: Tax Foundation, Annual State-Local Tax Burden
Ranking (FY 2011).
Illinois taxpayers pay state and local taxes not
only to Illinois but also to other state and local
governments due to tax shifting across state lines.
For example, sales and excise taxes are paid by
nonresident tourists when they travel to other
states and spend money on lodging and food.
29. CHAPTER 2 | 19
Illinois’ Tax Burden Is Now Higher than the U.S. Average
Total State-Local Tax Burden as a Percent of State Income, Illinois and U.S. Average (FY 2011)
Since 1977, state and local tax burdens in Illinois have fluctuated around the U.S. national
average. In the late 1970s through the late 1980s, tax burdens in Illinois were higher than
average. That trend flipped in the early 1990s through the early 2000s. Since 2008, Illinois’
tax burdens have exceeded that of the U.S.
Note: For a full list of definitional terms and
methodology, see Tax Foundation Working Paper No. 10.
Source: Tax Foundation, Annual State-Local Tax Burden
Ranking (FY 2011).
U.S. Average
Illinois
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
11.0%
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Three things can change a state’s tax burden as
a share of income: changes in taxes paid to other
states, changes in taxes paid to the home state,
and changes in state income.
30. 20 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Has the Most Under-Funded Public Pensions in the Country
Funded Portion of State-Sponsored Pension Plans (2012)
Public pensions, or the retirement benefits promised to public employees, are an important
state budgetary consideration. The degree to which a state meets these obligations offers
a glimpse of that state’s financial soundness. This measure is referred to as a “funded ratio”
because it estimates the amount of pension obligations that a state can pay at this time. As
of 2012, Illinois could only pay for 40.4 percent of existing public pension liabilities—the
least in the nation.
Note: “Funded Ratio” is defined as actuarial value of
assets divided by actuarial accrued liabilities.
Source: Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, U.S. State
Pension Funding: Strong Investment Returns Could Lift
Funded Ratios, But Longer-Term Challenges Remain, Table
3A (June 2014).
31. 21
Among the states that levy income taxes on wages and salaries,
Illinois is one of seven that has a single-rate, rather than
graduated-rate, tax structure. As of 2015, the Illinois rate is one
of the lowest in the country at 3.75 percent. This has positive
implications for both individual and business taxpayers.
Illinois lawmakers responded to the most recent recession with
an individual income tax increase, which began to sunset at the
end of 2014. Prior to this, the Illinois rate had generally seen
an upward trend over time (except for brief fluctuations in the
1980s).
But rates are only one component of the overall tax structure—
the tax base matters too. Illinois has many high-cost individual
income tax expenditures that carve away at the income tax
base. The most notable is the expenditure for retirement
income, which amounted to $2.23 billion in 2013.
The 2011 rate increase had one striking result: Illinois’ individual
income tax collections per person in 2012 were higher than
the all-state average. This was a recent change, however. Prior
to 2011 and at least as far back as the late 1970s, Illinois’
collections per person had always been below the U.S. average.
Individual Income
Tax in Illinois
CHAPTER 3
Peoria City Hall, photo: Scott McLeod
32. 22 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED CHAPTER 1 | 22
Illinois’ Individual Income Tax Rate Has Fluctuated over Time
Individual Income Tax Rate, Illinois (1969-2015)
The Illinois individual income tax has a history of temporary increases, one of which was
made permanent. The tax was originally created in 1969 with a rate of 2.5 percent levied on
all incomes. After brief fluctuation in the 1980s, the rate increased to 3 percent in the early
1990s. The rate remained constant for two decades before a temporary rate increase was
enacted in 2011. Rates dropped to 3.75 percent at the start of 2015 and are scheduled to
drop further to 3.25 percent in 2025.
Source: Illinois Department of Revenue, Tax Rate
Database; Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission,
Illinois Individual Income Tax (May 2002); Illinois General
Assembly, Illinois Compiled Statutes.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
A temporary rate
increase occurred
in 2011 and began to
sunset in 2015.
The rate fluctuated
between 2.5 and 3
percent in the 1980s.
A temporary rate increase enacted in
1989 (changing the rate to 3 percent)
was made permanent in the early
1990s.
Illinois’ individual income tax
was originally enacted in 1969.
33. CHAPTER 3 | 23
Illinois’ Individual Income Tax Collections per Person over Time
Total State and Local Individual Income Tax Collections per Capita, Illinois and U.S.
(1977-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
Prior to 2012, inflation-adjusted individual income tax collections per person in Illinois were
lower than state and local collections in the country on average. In 2012, however, this trend
flipped due to a substantial increase in Illinois’ individual income tax rate.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these years
are connected with dotted lines.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances; Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes.
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
1977 1982 1987 1992 2002 20071997 2012
Illinois
All States
34. 24 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Tax Bill
Jack Jason &
Nicole
Justine Max &
Danielle
Sam &
Ellen
Heidi &
Bret
Filing Status
Head of
Household
Married
Filing Jointly
Single
Married
Filing Jointly
Married
Filing Jointly
Married
Filing Jointly
Income $15,930 $38,304 $33,113 $83,546 $413,378 $1,747,714
Exemptions 2 2 1 4 2 4
Income Taxes
Paid to Illinois
$106 $0 $1,161 $2,810 $15,340 $65,217
Effective Tax
Rate (ETR),
Illinois
0.7% 0.0% 3.5% 3.4% 3.7% 3.7%
ETR, Federal
+ Illinois
-20.1% 0.0% 12.4% 12.1% 26.9% 33.7%
Retired
How Does the Illinois Individual Income Tax Impact Real People?
The way a state chooses to structure its income tax matters for real people. These six
scenarios show how low- or high-income Illinois taxpayers with or without children fare
under the code in Illinois and its six neighboring states.
Note: All calculations are made for the 2015 tax year and reflect state statutes and tax rates as of January, 1, 2015.
This assumes an equal split of income between spouses, all income was earned in the state of filing, no estimated
tax payments were made in advance, and there were no interest or penalties charged. This does not include Illinois’
property tax credit.
Source: State statutes and forms; Tax Foundation calculations.
35. CHAPTER 3 | 25
Tax Bills in Other Select
States in the Region
If these same Illinoisans lived in one of the states below, these would be their income tax bills.
Jack Jason &
Nicole
Justine Max &
Danielle
Sam &
Ellen
Heidi &
Bret
Filing Status
Head of
Household
Married
Filing Jointly
Single
Married
Filing Jointly
Married
Filing Jointly
Married
Filing Jointly
Income $15,930 $38,304 $33,113 $83,546 $413,378 $1,747,714
Exemptions 2 2 1 4 2 4
Total Taxes Paid in:
Illinois $106 $0 $1,161 $2,810 $15,340 $65,217
Indiana $146 $359 $1,060 $2,592 $13,575 $57,510
Iowa -$228 $148 $1,294 $4,410 $24,177 $88,810
Kentucky $1 $1,878 $1,587 $4,495 $22,826 $91,721
Michigan $139 $1,288 $1,237 $2,871 $17,229 $73,598
Missouri $136 $1,233 $1,342 $3,864 $23,738 $103,714
Wisconsin -$132 $1,050 $1,233 $4,292 $26,704 $128,674
Retired
Note: All calculations are made for the 2015 tax year and reflect state statutes and tax rates as of January, 1, 2015.
This assumes an equal split of income between spouses, all income was earned in the state of filing, no estimated
tax payments were made in advance, and there were no interest or penalties charged. This does not include Illinois’
property tax credit or local income taxes, which are levied in some states and can be substantial (Indiana, Iowa,
Kentucky, Michigan, and Missouri have local income taxes).
Source: State statutes and forms; Tax Foundation calculations.
36. 26 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Spent $4.35 Billion on Individual Income Tax Expenditures
in 2013
Individual Income Tax Expenditures, by Amount and Percent of Total (FY 2013)
A tax expenditure is an activity that has
been specifically exempted from taxation
via a subtraction, exclusion, deduction,
credit, or some other means. Individual
income tax expenditures in Illinois totaled
approximately $4.35 billion in 2013. The
largest expenditure (amounting to over
half of the total) was the subtraction for
retirement income, followed by the standard
exemption (25 percent of the total) and the
credit for residential property taxes paid (13
percent).
Source: State of Illinois Comptroller, Tax Expenditure
Report (Fiscal Year 2013).
Retirement Income
$2.23 billion (51%)
Standard Exemption
$1.11 billion (25%)
Residential Property
Taxes Credit
$547.8 million (13%)
Earned Income Tax Credit
$162.2 million (4%)
Education Expense Credit
$79.7 million (2%)
Blind & Elderly Exemptions
$34.6 million (1%)
Other Credits & Subtractions
$95.3 million (4%)
37. 27
All taxes paid by businesses are ultimately borne by people—
whether it’s in the form of higher prices, lower wages, or smaller
returns on investment. In Illinois, businesses paid $32.3 billion
in total taxes in 2013, primarily toward taxes other than the
corporate income tax (the most recognizable type of business
tax). In reality, many firms are pass-through entities such as
limited liability companies (LLCs), S-corporations, and sole
proprietorships that pay individual income taxes rather than
corporate income taxes. Businesses also pay property, sales, and
excise taxes, among others.
Illinois’ business tax structure has several flaws. Not only is the
corporate income tax rate comparatively high both regionally
and nationally, the state has many business incentives that carve
away at the tax base. Additional detrimental features exist,
including application of the sales tax to several business inputs,
lack of horizontal equity, and existence of a capital stock tax (a
tax that most states have eliminated).
Business Taxes in Illinois
CHAPTER 4
Chicago O’Hare International Airport, photo: N i c o l a
38. 28 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Businesses Don’t Just Pay Corporate Income Taxes
Illinois’ Total State and Local Business Tax Liability by Tax Type (FY 2013)
A common misconception is that corporate
income taxes are the only tax cost for
businesses. However, businesses pay a
number of other taxes, including property
taxes on real estate, sales taxes on the
goods they use, and individual income taxes
on business income (if they’re pass-through
entities that file through the individual
income tax code rather than the corporate
income tax code).
Overall, Illinois businesses paid $32.3 billion
in taxes in 2013, with the largest portion
going to property taxes.
Source: Council on State Taxation and Ernst & Young
LLP, Total state and local business taxes (FY 2013).
$4.7b
$4.5b
$3.8b
$3.3b
$1.6b
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
Excise
Taxes
Corporate
Income Tax
Sales
Tax
Unempl.
Insurance
Tax
License and
Other Taxes
Billions
$12.8b
Property
Taxes
$1.5b
Individual
Income Tax
39. CHAPTER 4 | 29
Businesses Pay Individual Income Taxes Too
Percent of Employer Businesses that Are Pass-Through Entities in Illinois’ Ten Largest Private
Industries (2011)
Firms that pay individual income taxes rather
than corporate income taxes are known as
“pass-through” or “flow-through” entities
because business income “flows through”
to the owner’s individual income tax return.
Sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S-
corporations are all types of pass-throughs.
Sixty-one percent of all employers with
payroll in Illinois are pass-through entities,
but that share varies for specific sectors
of the economy. However, it’s important
to note that even though this page breaks
down the total number of employer firms,
when we consider the aggregate number
of workers at businesses with payroll in
Illinois, most of them work at traditional
corporations (known as C-corporations).
Note: Industries listed are the ten largest private sector
industries in Illinois as determined by share of total
state GDP. This does not include non-employer firms.
Source: Census Bureau, County Business Patterns;
Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic
Accounts, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State, “GDP
in current dollars.”
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Real Estate
Manufacturing
Healthcare &
Social Assistance
Professional, Scientific, &
Technical Services
Finance & Insurance
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Information
Construction
Administrative & Support
Services
-ThroughEntities inIllinois'TenLargestPrivateIndustries
Sole Proprietorships Partnerships S-Corporations
69.5%
60.4%
38.2%
51.3%
54.0%
48.2%
76.6%
58.2%
69.8%
77.7%
40. 30 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Effective Tax Rates Vary Widely by Industry and Age of Firm
Total Effective Tax Rates for Select Illinois Business Types, New and Mature Firms (2015)
The Tax Foundation’s Location Matters study calculates the tax bills in every state for 14
hypothetical firms (one new and one mature) in seven different industries. Under the
existing Illinois tax code, new and mature firms tend to be treated differently. This feature is
most pronounced in the retail industry, among distribution centers, and for capital-intensive
manufacturing firms. Ideally, firms in the same industry should face the same effective tax
rate, regardless of whether they are new or mature.
Note: Total effective tax rate only includes state and
local tax liability, not federal tax liability.
Source: Tax Foundation, Location Matters: A Comparative
Analysis of State Tax Costs to Business
(2015, forthcoming).
New Firms Mature Firms
6.5%
10.0%
29.3%
25.5%
14.3%
17.0%
33.1%
14.2% 14.4%
26.9%
36.0%
18.3%
14.5%
19.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Capital-Intensive
Manufacturing
Operation
Labor-Intensive
Manufacturing
Operation
Call Center Distribution Center Corporate
Headquarters
Research and
Development
Facility
Retail Store
41. CHAPTER 4 | 31
Corporate Income Tax Rate Has Fluctuated over Time
Illinois’ Total Corporate Income Tax Rate (1969-2015)
Illinois’ corporate income tax is the 17th highest in the nation. The 7.75 percent rate
includes two components: the general corporate income tax (with a current rate of 5.25
percent levied on net income) and what is known as the “Personal Property Replacement
Tax” (PPRT) (an additional 2.5 percent rate, also levied on net income). The PPRT was added
in 1979 to make up for reduced local tax revenues as a result of the removal of business
personal property taxes.
Note: “Total Corporate Income Tax Rate” includes
the corporate income tax and Personal Property
Replacement Tax.
Source: Illinois General Assembly, Illinois Compiled
Statutes; Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission,
Illinois Corporate Income Tax (July 2002).
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
Illinois' general corporate
income tax was enacted in
1969 at a rate of 4%.
The PPRT rate
decreased to 2.5% in
1981, dropping the
total rate to 6.5%.
The general corporate
rate temporarily increased
to 7% in 2011, making the
total rate 9.5%. This
higher rate partially
sunset in 2015.
In mid-1989, the
general corporate
rate increased to
4.8%, raising the
total rate to 7.3%.
In 1983 and part of 1984, the general
corporate income tax rate briefly increased.
The total rate went back to 6.5% in
mid-1984.
In 1979, a 2.85%
Personal Property
Replacement Tax
(PPRT) was added on
top of the general
corporate income tax,
creating a total rate of
6.85%.
42. 32 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Corporate Income Tax Collections per Person Are Volatile
Total State and Local Corporate Income Tax Collections per Capita, Illinois and U.S.
(1977-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
Corporate income tax collections per person in Illinois are currently higher than the U.S.
level and have fluctuated widely over time. While corporate income taxes are often a
popular tool among state lawmakers for funding state governments, they are an unreliable
tool because of their instability over the business cycle.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these years
are connected with dotted lines.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances; Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
Illinois
All States
43. CHAPTER 4 | 33
Illinois Is One of Only 18 States that Levies a Capital Stock Tax
States with and without Capital Stock Taxes (as of January 1, 2015)
Less than half of the states in the U.S. levy a capital stock tax, an economically-damaging
business tax imposed at a low rate but directly on business capital. These taxes are levied
on the net assets or market capitalization of a business entity. The Illinois capital stock tax
is formally known as the “Corporate Franchise Tax” and is levied at a rate of 0.1 percent up
to a maximum payment value of $2 million, with additional taxes due upon the occurrence
of various corporate events (such as a merger or issuance of new stock). Some states have
much lower maximum payment amounts, such as Georgia ($5,000), Nebraska ($11,995),
Alabama ($15,000), Oklahoma ($20,000), and Delaware ($180,000). Others have no limit.
Note: Missouri, New York, and Pennsylvania are in the
process of phasing out their capital stock taxes. Rhode
Island and West Virginia just finished phasing out their
capital stock taxes. (*) indicates that taxpayers pay the
greater of corporate income tax or capital stock tax
liability. See Table 33 of Tax Foundation, Facts & Figures
2015 for more information.
Source: Tax Foundation, Facts & Figures 2015: How Does
Your State Compare?
VA
NC
SC
GA
FL
ALMS
TN
KY
OH
INIL
MO
AR
LA
IA
MN
WI
MI
PA
NY*
ME
TX
OK
KS
NE
SD
NDMT
WY*
CO
NMAZ
UT
NV
ID
OR
WA
CA
AK
HI
WV
MA
RI
CT*
NJ
DE
MD
DC
VT NH
State Has a Capital
Stock Tax
State Is Phasing out
a Capital Stock Tax
State Does Not Have
a Capital Stock Tax
44. 34
Illinois’ sales tax rate is high compared to both the region and
the nation in part due to a high state-level tax but also as a
result of additional local option sales taxes. The state-level
rate has generally increased over time, and this can be partially
attributed to a shrinking tax base.
The shrinking sales tax base is not unique to Illinois. States
tend to levy sales taxes on goods, even though the services
sector now makes up a much larger share of the economy than
when sales tax statutes were written in the 1930s. Over time,
the decreasing tax base has contributed to the stagnation of
sales tax collections per person in Illinois, even as the rate has
increased.
Sales Taxes in Illinois
CHAPTER 5
Chicago Food Trucks, photo: Jaysin Trevino
45. CHAPTER 5 | 35
Illinois Has the Highest Combined Average Sales Tax Rate among
Its Neighbors
Combined State and Average Local Sales Tax Rates, Illinois and Neighbors (as of July 1, 2014)
Sales taxes in most states are levied at both
the state and local levels. Illinois’ state-level
rate (6.25 percent), which is already high
compared to other states, is made higher by
the additional local taxes that are tacked on
top.
When both are considered, Illinois has the
highest combined average rate among its
neighbors and the 10th highest rate in
the country. Local sales taxes, on average,
amount to 1.94 percent. Indiana, Kentucky,
and Michigan do not levy local sales taxes.
Source: Tax Foundation, Facts & Figures 2015: How Does
Your State Compare?
Total Sales Tax Rate
National Rank
KY
INIL
MO
IA
6.78%
7.81%
8.19% 7%
6%
6%
5.43%
37
21
37
44
10
27
14
WI
MI
46. 36 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
State-Level Sales Tax Rate Has Risen over Time
Illinois’ State Sales Tax Rate (1933-2015)
Since its creation in 1933, Illinois’ state sales tax rate has more than tripled from 2 percent
to 6.25 percent today. Except for two brief rate decreases (one in 1941 and another in
1969), the sales tax rate has increased over time. The current state-level rate of 6.25 percent
is the 12th highest in the country. Note: This does not include local option sales taxes (see
previous page).
Source: Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting
and Accountability, Sales Taxes in Illinois (May 2010);
Commerce Clearing House.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
1933 1943 1953 1963 1973 1983 1993 20132003
47. CHAPTER 5 | 37
Illinois’ Sales Tax Applies to Less and Less of the Economy
Illinois’ Sales Tax Breadth (1970-2013)
An ideal sales tax is one that is levied on all
final consumer purchases. By taxing a large
number of transactions, the rate can be kept
low and still raise sufficient revenue.
When sales taxes were created in the
1930s, they were levied on tangible goods,
which at the time were a large part of the
overall economy. However, the economy
has become more service based since
then. As a result, the sales tax is not nearly
as productive. Further, by failing to tax
consumer services, the sales tax inherently
favors the services sector of the economy
over the goods sector.
Note: Sales tax breadth is defined as the ratio of the
implicit sales tax base to state personal income.
Source: Professor John Mikesell (Indiana University).
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
48. 38 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Even with High Rates, Illinois Has Lower Sales Tax Collections per
Person than the U.S.
Total State and Local Sales Tax Collections per Capita, Illinois and U.S.
(1977-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
Illinois’ state and local sales tax collections per person are much lower than the U.S. average,
despite the fact that the state has a comparatively high total sales tax rate. While inflation-
adjusted total U.S. collections exhibit an upward trend over time, Illinois’ collections have
remained relatively flat, despite several historical rate increases.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these years
are connected with dotted lines.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances; Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes.
Illinois
All States
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
49. CHAPTER 5 | 39
Not All Sales Tax Expenditures Are Created Equal
Illinois’ Sales and Use Tax Expenditures, by Type (FY 2013)
When states quantify tax expenditures, they often mistakenly lump structural provisions
with social policy carve-outs, when the two should be distinct. The former are tools used to
ensure the sales tax is correctly structured—such as exemptions for business input purchases
(to avoid tax pyramiding). Approximately 34 percent of sales tax expenditures fall into this
category. Social policy carve-outs are specific policy decisions enacted for a certain purpose
(56 percent fall into this category). Source: State of Illinois Comptroller, Tax Expenditure
Report (Fiscal Year 2013).
Social Policy
56%
Economic Development
10%
Structural
34%
Exemption for Building Materials within Enterprise
Zone, River Edge, Redevelopment Zone, or Intermodal
Terminal Facility Redevelopment Project
Exemption for Designated Tangible Personal Property
within Enterprise Zone
All Other, which Includes High Impact Business Building
Materials Exemption and High Impact Business
Designated Tangible Personal Property Exemption
Gasohol Discount
Biodiesel Discount & Exemption
Feed, Seed, & Farm Chemicals Exemption
Manufacturing & Assembling Machinery & Equipment
Exemption
Rolling Stock Exemption
Farm Machinery & Equipment Exemption
Sales of Vehicles to Automobile Renters Exemption
Manufacturer's Purchase Credit
Exemption for Newsprint & Ink Sold to Newspapers and
Magazines
Graphic Arts & Machinery & Equipment Exemption
Retailer's Discount
Traded-In Property Exemption
Sales of Motor Vehicles to Nonresidents
Rate Reduction for Food, Drugs, & Medical Appliances
Sales to Exempt Organizations
50. 40
States levy transactional taxes not only on general purchases
(in the form of sales taxes) but also on specific types of
transactions, such as the purchase of gasoline, alcohol,
cigarettes, and wireless phone service. These taxes are known
as excise taxes.
Excise tax collections per person have increased over time
in Illinois and are much higher than the national average. We
highlight three types of excise taxes in this chapter: gasoline
excise taxes, “sin” taxes (on cigarettes and alcohol), and wireless
phone service taxes.
Gasoline excise taxes in most states aren’t indexed for inflation,
meaning that their value has eroded over time. This is also true
for Illinois, however, gasoline is subject to the sales tax in Illinois
as well as an excise tax. Sin taxes in Illinois, except for those on
beer, tend to be comparatively high nationally. Wireless taxes
are also well above the national average in Illinois.
Excise Taxes in Illinois
CHAPTER 6
University of Illinois Campus, photo: Kathryn Coulter
51. CHAPTER 6 | 41
Illinois’ Total Excise Tax Collections per Person Are High
Total State and Local Excise Tax Collections per Capita, Illinois and U.S. (1977-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
When all state and local excise taxes are considered, Illinois’ collections per capita are well
above the national average. Excise taxes include those levied on the purchase of gasoline,
alcohol, cigarettes and other tobacco products, amusements, insurance premiums, public
utilities, and others.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these years
are connected with dotted lines.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances; Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes.
$900
$800
$700
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$0
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
All States
Illinois
52. 42 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
The Value of Illinois’ Gas Tax Has Declined over Time
Illinois’ Gasoline Tax Rate, Nominal and Real (1927-2014)
All states tax motor fuels with excise taxes on gasoline and diesel. Illinois’ gas tax started
at 2 cents per gallon in 1927 and has increased periodically to today’s 20.1 cents per
gallon (yellow line). The blue line shows each year’s tax rate expressed in today’s cents. For
example, the 5 cent per gallon tax in 1957 is the equivalent of 42 cents per gallon today.
Note: Amounts are inflation-adjusted based on the
annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2014 base year. Rates include
the state gasoline excise tax, environmental impact
fee, and underground storage fee. Fees are scheduled
to sunset in January 2025. Rates do not include local
excise taxes or state sales tax.
Source: Illinois General Assembly, Illinois Compiled
Statutes; U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Highway
Statistics; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price
Indexes.
0¢
10¢
20¢
30¢
40¢
50¢
60¢
1927 1932 1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
Tax Rate in 2014 Cents
Tax Rate in Nominal Cents
53. CHAPTER 6 | 43
State Cigarette
Tax Rate
$1.98
per pack
16th
highest in U.S.
State Spirits
Tax Rate
$8.55
per gallon
14th
highest in U.S.
State Wine
Tax Rate
$1.39
per gallon
11th
highest in U.S.
State Beer
Tax Rate
$0.23
per gallon
27th
highest in U.S.
Illinois’ State Excise Taxes on Cigarettes and Alcohol
State Excise Tax Rates on Cigarettes, Spirits, Wine, and Beer (as of January 1, 2015)
Taxes on cigarettes and different types of alcohol are often referred to as “sin” taxes. While
excise taxes on the sale of these specific types of goods should be used to offset the social
costs created by their private use (such as the health issues associated with cigarette
and alcohol use), sin taxes should not be used as a means to raise general revenues. The
revenues aren’t sustainable over the long run, and these taxes tend to be regressive.
Illinois has relatively high state-level taxes on cigarettes, spirits, and wine. Taxes on beer are
more competitive. Local taxes are not included here, which can be substantial.
Note: The cigarette tax rate assumes 20 cigarettes in a
pack.
Source: Tax Foundation, Facts & Figures 2015: How Does
Your State Compare?
54. 44 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Taxpayers Face High Wireless Service Taxes
Charges on Wireless Service, Illinois and U.S. Average (as of July 2014)
Wireless consumers continue to face
excessive tax burdens when compared to
the tax burden on other goods and services
purchased in the competitive marketplace.
The average rates of taxes and fees on
wireless telephone services are more than
two times higher than the average sales tax
rates that apply to most other taxable goods
and services.
When federal, state, and local taxes and fees
on wireless service are considered, Illinois
taxpayers face the fifth highest effective tax
rate in the country (21.63 percent). This is
considerably higher than the U.S. average of
17.05 percent.
Source: Tax Foundation, Wireless Taxation in the United
States 2014.
Federal Rate
5.82%
Federal Rate
5.82%
Average State +
Local Rate:
11.23%
Average State +
Local Rate:
15.81%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Illinois
Combined Total Rate:
17.05%
Combined Total Rate:
21.63%
U.S. Average
55. 45
Property taxes are a major part of Illinois’ revenue toolkit,
representing the largest share of total state and local tax
collections. While this is a local-level tax in Illinois, it still has
broad implications for state finances.
Illinois’ property tax collections per person, which include taxes
paid by both businesses and individuals, are nearly the highest
in the nation and have risen over time. When only residential
property taxes are considered, Illinois’ effective rates again rank
among the highest.
When we discuss property taxes, we’re often describing many
layers of taxation at the local level—taxes levied by towns,
cities, counties, school districts, and even specific-purpose
districts such as those dedicated to fire protection. Because of
this, effective property tax rates vary widely by county but also
exhibit much intra-county variation, as well.
Property Taxes in Illinois
CHAPTER 7
Edward R. Hills House, Oak Park, Illinois, photo: IvoShandor
56. 46 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Illinois Has High Property Tax Collections per Person
Total State and Local Property Tax Collections per Capita, Illinois and U.S.
(1977-2012, in 2012 Dollars)
Only real property is taxed in Illinois, while personal property (things other than land and
buildings, such as cars and furniture) is untaxed. Inflation-adjusted property tax collections
per person in Illinois are higher than U.S. collections per person and have been since 1977.
Based on this measure of property taxes, Illinois’ are some of the highest in the nation,
ranking 10th as of 2012.
Note: Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted based on
the annual average Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) with a 2012 base year. Because local
data is unavailable for 2001 and 2003, those points
were excluded here, and points surrounding these years
are connected with dotted lines.
Source: Census Bureau, State and Local Government
Finances; Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes;
Illinois Department of Revenue, The Illinois Property Tax
System.
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
Illinois
All States
57. CHAPTER 7 | 47
Illinois’ Residential Effective Property Tax Rates Are
Comparatively High
Aggregate Real Estate Taxes Paid as a Percent of Aggregate Housing Value of Owner-Occupied
Housing Units (5-Year Estimate, 2009-2013)
One way to look at state property taxes is
to calculate a state’s residential effective
tax rate and see how it stacks up compared
to other states’. Illinois’ residential effective
rate is third highest in the nation—outranked
only by New Jersey’s and New Hampshire’s.
In the region, only Wisconsin’s rate comes
anywhere close to Illinois’.
However, this measure of property taxes is
a state average, so it does not demonstrate
the variation in residential effective rates
among and within counties in the state. And
because this measure looks specifically at
residential property, business property is not
included.
Note: “Residential Effective Property Tax Rate” is
calculated by dividing the total real estate (property)
taxes paid in a state by the state’s total housing value
(owner-occupied units only). The American Community
Survey data used here is based on 5-year estimates
(2009 to 2013). This data does not include commercial
property.
Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey.
Effective Tax Rate
National Rank
KY
INIL
MO
IA
1.39%
1.02%
1.92% 0.93%
0.80%
1.63%
1.77%
34
28
8
5
3
14
23
WI
MI
58. 48 | ILLINOIS ILLUSTRATED
Residential Effective Property Tax Rates Vary Widely among
Counties
Aggregate Real Estate Taxes Paid as a Percent of Aggregate Housing Value of Owner-Occupied
Housing Units (5-Year Estimate, 2009-2013)
On average, the residential effective property tax rate in Illinois
(using a five year average from 2009 to 2013) was 1.92 percent,
though county-specific values vary around this mean. The highest
residential effective rate occurred in Kendall County at 2.61
percent, while the lowest was in Hardin County at 0.84 percent.
Cook County, the home of metropolitan Chicago, had an effective
property tax rate of 1.68 percent.
Within a county, individual homeowners’ effective rates may
differ from these county averages. For example, a home in Cook
County could have drastically different effective property tax rates
depending on where it sits—a recent study found that a $250,000
home in Chicago in 2010 had an effective property tax rate of 1.28
percent, while a home with the same market value in Park Forest
(also in Cook County) had an effective rate of 5.68 percent.
It’s important to note than an effective property tax rate is not the
same as the millage rate (that is, the statutory property tax rate
levied by a local government).
Note: “Residential Effective Property Tax Rate” is calculated
by dividing the total real estate (property) taxes paid in a
county by the county’s total housing value (owner-occupied
units only). The American Community Survey data used here
is based on 5-year estimates (2009 to 2013). This data does
not include commercial property.
Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey;
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois, Tax Facts, Volume 66, No. 3
(Summer 2013).
2.61%
0.84%
59. CHAPTER 7 | 49
Illinois Had 5,976 Different Taxing Districts in 2012
Percent of Total Number of Taxing Districts by Type (2012)
Property taxes are levied at the local
level, and there are many types of local
government entities with taxing authority,
including counties, cities, towns, school
districts, and special purpose districts (such
as those for fire protection, hospitals, and
airports).
Of the nearly 6,000 local taxing districts
that existed in Illinois in 2012, the largest
share were special districts (36.6 percent of
the total number), followed by townships
(24.0 percent), and cities, villages, and
incorporated towns (21.3 percent).
Note: “School Districts” includes elementary, unit, high,
non-high, and community college districts. “Special
Districts” includes the following types of districts: fire
protection, park, sanitary, forest preserve, mosquito
abatement, public health, airport authority, library,
hospital, street lighting, river conservancy, water
authority, surface water protection, cemetery, soil and
water conservation, auditorium authority, mass transit,
watershed/flood control, multi-township assessment,
water service, museum, solid waste disposal, rescue
squad, and public water.
Source: Illinois Department of Revenue, 2012 Property
Tax Statistics.
Counties
102 (1.7%)
Townships
1,433 (24.0%)
Road Districts
77 (1.3%)
Cities, Villages, &
Incorporated Towns
1,274 (21.3%)
School Districts
902 (15.1%)
Special Districts
2,188 (36.6%)
60.
61. Attributions
Center for State Tax Policy
Joseph Henchman
Vice President, State Projects
Scott Drenkard
Economist & Manager of State Projects
Liz Malm
Economist
Jared Walczak
Policy Analyst
Publications
Melodie Bowler
Editor
Dan Carvajal
Production Designer
About the Tax Foundation
The Tax Foundation is the nation’s leading independent tax policy
research organization. Since 1937, our principled research, insightful
analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter tax policy at
the federal, state, and local levels. Our Center for State Tax Policy
is routinely relied upon for presentations, testimony, and media
appearances on state tax and fiscal policy, and our website is a
comprehensive resource for information on tax and spending policy in
each U.S. state.
About the Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois
and the Illinois Fiscal Policy Council
The Illinois Fiscal Policy Council was created in 1981 by the Taxpayers’
Federation of Illinois, the state’s most respected nonpartisan state
and local tax and fiscal policy advocacy organization. The Council
is a charitable foundation focusing on state and local government
finance, particularly issues relating to how Illinois taxes its citizens
and businesses. Its educational materials, studies, and other research
papers are geared toward and available to the public, elected officials,
and the media.
Front Cover – A Greater Task, Springfield, Illinois photo: Mary C.
Back Cover – Chicago, Illinois, photo: David Wilson
62.
63.
64. Taxes are complicated. Each state’s tax code is a multifaceted system with
many moving parts, and Illinois is no exception. This chart book aims to
help readers understand Illinois’ overall economy and tax system from a
broad perspective. But it also provides detailed illustrations of each of
Illinois’ major tax types—individual income taxes, business taxes, sales and
excise taxes, and property taxes—to help make the complicated task of
understanding the state’s tax code a bit easier.