This document provides information about California's independent bill review process established under SB 863. It includes a quick reference guide to the rules governing the IBR process with 14 pages of content and timelines. The document also contains 6 flowcharts illustrating the steps in the IBR process. It was created by Richard Boggan, an attorney, as a reference for understanding how the IBR system works according to the emergency regulations.
This bill proposes legislation to establish a pediatric medical device innovation tax credit program in Minnesota. It would provide refundable tax credits of up to $500,000 for qualified businesses engaged in developing pediatric medical devices. To qualify, businesses must meet certain criteria related to location, size, revenues, and years in operation. The bill outlines an application process to be certified for the tax credits and requires annual reporting. Unused credits can be cancelled after two years and reallocated to other applicants. The Department of Employment and Economic Development would administer the program.
The document summarizes various corporate, taxation, and other regulatory updates from October 24-25, 2017. Specifically:
1) MCA notified that powers under Section 247 of the Companies Act regarding valuation by registered valuers will be delegated to IBBI.
2) CBDT clarified guidelines regarding "Place of Effective Management" for deciding company residency status and that regional headquarters operations will not alone constitute a case for establishing POEM.
3) CBDT invited comments on amending Income Tax Rules regarding registration of charitable/religious trusts following amendments to the Income Tax Act.
Corporate Update
SEBI
Acceptance of e-PAN card for KYC purpose
Specifications related to International Securities Identification Number (ISINs) for debt securities issued under the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008
Clarification on monitoring of Interest/ Principal repayment and sharing of such information with Credit Rating Agencies by Debenture Trustees
Monitoring and Review of Ratings by Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs)
MCA
Ministry of Corporate Affairs issues a notification exempting every person or enterprise who is a party to a combination from giving notice within 30 days for a period of 5 years from the date of publication of the notification;
TAXATION
Rules related to Registration and Composition Scheme have been notified on 19th June, 2017& came into effect from 22nd June, 2017 in order to start the process of issue of Registration Certificate, called Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN), to taxpayers already issued provisional ID for registration (PID) as well as to the new taxpayers.
Government imposes levy of 10% basic customs duty (BCD) on cellular mobile phone, specified parts thereof and certain electronic goods.
GSTN unveils excel template for to help taxpayers perform easy data entry offline before uploading on the GST portal; Excel template together with an offline tool will make uploading large numbers of invoices much easier and quick; Offline Tool to be unveiled on July 17, 2017.
Company Website:
www.acquisory.com
This document outlines the standard conditions of contract for design and build projects in the public sector. It defines key terms used in the contract such as contractor, employer, superintending officer, works, defects liability period. It also describes general obligations of the contractor, procedures for payments, variations, claims, insurance, dispute resolution and termination of contract. The conditions are intended to provide a standardized framework for design and build contracts between the public sector and contractors.
This bill proposes changes to North Carolina law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It includes provisions to provide tax relief, flexibility for administering unemployment benefits, and a $75 million appropriation for small business emergency loans through Golden LEAF to assist businesses impacted by economic hardship due to the pandemic. The bill aims to support individuals, businesses and the economy during this public health crisis.
Indian Companies Act 2013 - Chapter 1: Specification of definitions detailsBold Kiln
Law governing formation, functions and all other details pertaining to different types of companies in India. Passed in 2013. Indian Companies Act 2013 - Chapter 1
Key Amendments proposed under the Indirect Tax lawsTaxmann
Budget 2021 has introduced several amendments under the Indirect Tax Laws. In this document, we have highlighted key amendments proposed under Customs and GST.
This bill proposes legislation to establish a pediatric medical device innovation tax credit program in Minnesota. It would provide refundable tax credits of up to $500,000 for qualified businesses engaged in developing pediatric medical devices. To qualify, businesses must meet certain criteria related to location, size, revenues, and years in operation. The bill outlines an application process to be certified for the tax credits and requires annual reporting. Unused credits can be cancelled after two years and reallocated to other applicants. The Department of Employment and Economic Development would administer the program.
The document summarizes various corporate, taxation, and other regulatory updates from October 24-25, 2017. Specifically:
1) MCA notified that powers under Section 247 of the Companies Act regarding valuation by registered valuers will be delegated to IBBI.
2) CBDT clarified guidelines regarding "Place of Effective Management" for deciding company residency status and that regional headquarters operations will not alone constitute a case for establishing POEM.
3) CBDT invited comments on amending Income Tax Rules regarding registration of charitable/religious trusts following amendments to the Income Tax Act.
Corporate Update
SEBI
Acceptance of e-PAN card for KYC purpose
Specifications related to International Securities Identification Number (ISINs) for debt securities issued under the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008
Clarification on monitoring of Interest/ Principal repayment and sharing of such information with Credit Rating Agencies by Debenture Trustees
Monitoring and Review of Ratings by Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs)
MCA
Ministry of Corporate Affairs issues a notification exempting every person or enterprise who is a party to a combination from giving notice within 30 days for a period of 5 years from the date of publication of the notification;
TAXATION
Rules related to Registration and Composition Scheme have been notified on 19th June, 2017& came into effect from 22nd June, 2017 in order to start the process of issue of Registration Certificate, called Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN), to taxpayers already issued provisional ID for registration (PID) as well as to the new taxpayers.
Government imposes levy of 10% basic customs duty (BCD) on cellular mobile phone, specified parts thereof and certain electronic goods.
GSTN unveils excel template for to help taxpayers perform easy data entry offline before uploading on the GST portal; Excel template together with an offline tool will make uploading large numbers of invoices much easier and quick; Offline Tool to be unveiled on July 17, 2017.
Company Website:
www.acquisory.com
This document outlines the standard conditions of contract for design and build projects in the public sector. It defines key terms used in the contract such as contractor, employer, superintending officer, works, defects liability period. It also describes general obligations of the contractor, procedures for payments, variations, claims, insurance, dispute resolution and termination of contract. The conditions are intended to provide a standardized framework for design and build contracts between the public sector and contractors.
This bill proposes changes to North Carolina law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It includes provisions to provide tax relief, flexibility for administering unemployment benefits, and a $75 million appropriation for small business emergency loans through Golden LEAF to assist businesses impacted by economic hardship due to the pandemic. The bill aims to support individuals, businesses and the economy during this public health crisis.
Indian Companies Act 2013 - Chapter 1: Specification of definitions detailsBold Kiln
Law governing formation, functions and all other details pertaining to different types of companies in India. Passed in 2013. Indian Companies Act 2013 - Chapter 1
Key Amendments proposed under the Indirect Tax lawsTaxmann
Budget 2021 has introduced several amendments under the Indirect Tax Laws. In this document, we have highlighted key amendments proposed under Customs and GST.
The President of India has given its assent to the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2019, which further amends the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2019 has been now published in the Official Gazette on 31 July 2019 as the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (the
Amendment Act).
The Amendment Act has taken into consideration the amendments that were originally notified in the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 which was promulgated by the President on 2 November 2018, and then retained in effect through the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance Act, 2019 and the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 promulgated by the President on 12 January 2019 and 21 February 2019, respectively.
Electronic Transaction Act 2063 (ETA 2063)Krishna Pandey
The Electronic Transactions Act of 2008 establishes a legal framework for electronic records and digital signatures in Nepal. Some key points:
- It recognizes the legal validity of electronic records and digital signatures.
- It establishes the role of a Controller to oversee certifying authorities and issue them licenses to issue digital certificates.
- Certifying authorities must be licensed by the Controller and may have their licenses suspended if they violate the terms.
- The act aims to authenticate electronic records, ensure their integrity and confidentiality, and regulate unauthorized access.
Corporate Udates
#SEBI
Charging of additional expenses of upto 0.20% in terms of Regulation 52 (6A) (c) of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 -
SEBI issues Circular w.r.t. Total Expense Ratio (TER)– change and disclosure which shall be applicable on All Mutual Funds/AMCs/Trustee Companies
MCA
MCA exempts Government Company from complying with Ind AS 12 for 7 years w.e.f April 2017
MCA designates Special Courts in Kerala, Odisha and Guwahati for speedy Trial of offences
TAXATION
GST: Government Notifies Postponement of E-Way Bill
CBDT has issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding taxation of long-term capital gains proposed in Finance Bill, 2018.
OTHERS
DGFT – Issues a public notice to notify the amendment in the procedure of seeking modification in IEC
Company Website-
www.acquisory.com
This document establishes rules for interpreting business property insurance policies in Oregon relating to business interruption claims from events like pandemics. It prohibits certain insurer conduct like failing to timely investigate or pay claims. Insureds can sue for actual damages if insurers violate these rules. The act takes effect immediately.
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...tonyturnerlaw
The U.S. Supreme Court approved amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that are expected to take effect on December 1, 2018. Many of the amendments are technical in nature and are intended to update bankruptcy rules related to electronic filing, appeals, judgments, and other procedural matters. Key changes include mandating electronic filing for attorneys, updating rules related to home equity loans and fees/expenses, expanding the definition of entry of judgment, and addressing bankruptcy court jurisdiction over final judgments.
Dear Professional Colleagues,
Sharing with you "Budget Updates-2019". A brief analysis of:
1. Transfer Pricing Amendments
2. Individual Taxation-Tax Incentives
3. Tax Rates
Hope you will find it useful and informative too.
Regards
CA. Reetika G Agarwal
Taxmann's Highlights of the Finance Bill, 2021 – Income TaxTaxmann
The document summarizes key proposals in the Finance Bill 2021 related to direct taxes in India. Some key points include:
1. Exemption proposed for cash allowance received in lieu of leave travel concession during COVID-19, subject to conditions.
2. Threshold for tax audit increased to Rs. 10 crore from Rs. 5 crore if at least 95% transactions are through digital modes.
3. Time limits reduced for processing ITR, notice for scrutiny and reopening assessments.
4. Faceless scheme proposed for ITAT appeals and new Dispute Resolution Committee for small taxpayers.
5. Income-tax Settlement Commission to be discontinued and replaced by Interim Board of Settlement.
This document contains answers to frequently asked questions regarding goods and services tax (GST) for drugs and pharmaceuticals.
It addresses questions about how formulations will be assessed under GST, requirements for clearance of free physician samples, procedures for movement of expired medicines, treatment of supplies to special economic zones, and whether separate registrations are required for input service distributors and units located in SEZs.
It also provides details on transitional credit that can be availed for existing stock, treatment of purchases from unregistered persons, and the effect of non-payment of consideration for supplies received.
This document outlines an addendum to a Master Services Agreement between BT and a customer for the sale and installation of video conferencing equipment. It details that BT will sell equipment and provide installation services according to customer orders. Title and risk of loss passes to the customer upon delivery. The customer must pay all applicable fees and charges and grants BT a security interest in the equipment until full payment. The only applicable warranties are those provided by the equipment manufacturers.
Types of Assessment in GST-
Self Assessment
Provisional Assessment
Scrutiny of Returns
Assessment of Non-filers
Assessment of Unregistered persons
Summary Assessment
- Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique identification number given to directors of companies in India.
- Every individual who is appointed as a director of a company must obtain a DIN by submitting an application to the Central Government.
- If there are any changes to the director's particulars submitted for DIN allotment, the director must notify the Central Government within 30 days using Form DIR-6. The Central Government will then update the director's records after verification.
This document summarizes the proceedings of a court hearing regarding the supply of Remdesivir and other essential drugs in Maharashtra during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The court notes a positive development where the central government increased Maharashtra's Remdesivir allocation to 435,000 vials based on the state's request. However, the court wants more information from Maharashtra on implementing the central order, appointing a nodal officer, and district-wise allocation.
The court also notes issues with some districts allowing private purchases of Remdesivir, and wants clarity on procurement methods. It seeks details from Maharashtra on supplies of other drugs like Ivermectin and plans to import Remdesivir from other countries.
Budget 2017-18 - analysis of direct tax proposalsoswinfo
No change in tax slabs
The rate of income tax for individuals and HUF within the slab of 2.5 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs reduced from 10% to 5%.
Additional surcharge of 10% on the tax payable by a person having total income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs but not exceeding Rs. 1 crore.
31 May Weekly Newsletter - N Pahilwani & AssociatesNitin Pahilwani
This weekly newsletter contains income tax and GST updates for the week. For income tax, it summarizes changes to ITR forms for AY 2020-21 including new schedules for investments, the launch of instant PAN through Aadhaar-based e-KYC, and notifications regarding annual information statements replacing Form 26AS. For GST, it provides updates on the GST portal including new registration options for insolvency professionals and enabling EVC filing for companies. It also summarizes some judicial rulings related to transfer of goods ownership, tax deduction at source on exempt supplies, and authority of subordinate officers.
The document discusses the various types of returns that must be filed under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. It explains returns that normal taxpayers, composition taxpayers, foreign non-residents, input service distributors, tax deductors, and e-commerce operators must file, including GSTR-1, GSTR-2, GSTR-3, GSTR-4, and others. These returns must be filed monthly or quarterly and include details of outward and inward supplies, tax payments, input tax credit, and reconciliations to ensure all transactions are recorded properly.
Taxmann's Deduction of Tax at Source with Advance Tax Taxmann
This book provides a complete and thorough analysis of the Income-tax provisions relating to deduction or collection of tax at source, advance tax, and refunds.
This book is the 33rd Edition & updated till 6th July 2020. It incorporates all the amendments listed below:
• Finance Act, 2020
• The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019
• The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020
Key features of the book are as follows:
• Information on all the interconnected provisions are provided
at a single place
• Detailed analysis of TDS and TCS provisions
• Complete analysis of the rules prescribed on TDS and TCS
provisions
• Illustrations for easy understanding of various complex
provisions
• Guidance on the controversial issues with supporting Case
Laws
• Circulars and notifications are linked with the relevant
provisions
• Forms required for meeting compliance requirements
• The list of content to quickly find the required information
The document provides an overview of various corporate, taxation, regulatory and legal updates from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and other regulatory bodies in India. Some key points include enhanced limits for related party transactions and disclosure of employee remuneration in companies, green initiatives for electronic filings with MCA, simplified amalgamation process for government companies, review of cost auditor appointment process, and clarifications regarding XBRL filing and definition of partnerships in professional acts. It also summarizes amendments related to service tax rates for restaurants and short-term accommodation, and proposals regarding life insurance and health services.
1) A report on an investigation into an incident was submitted to the court in a sealed envelope. The report stated that 4 accused had been apprehended while the 5th was absconding, and they were waiting for reports from the forensic lab and doctor on the cause of death.
2) The court directed the state government to expedite submission of the forensic report and submit a further report on March 1st.
3) The court also directed a respondent to provide details on compliance with assurances to employ spouses of the deceased and to explain prejudging the incident as an accidental fall.
4) The state government was directed to consider directions to authorities on implementing rules regarding employment as manual scavengers and
Draft rules for 16 chapters issued on september 7 2013 by mca(1)mystartupvakil.com
This document provides draft rules for 16 chapters of the Companies Act, 2013 that were issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in India for public comment. It includes definitions for key terms related to companies, rules for incorporating a One Person Company, requirements for the subscriber or member of a One Person Company to nominate another person in case of incapacity, and rules regarding related parties. The draft rules aim to provide regulations and procedures for various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
This short document promotes creating presentations using Haiku Deck, a tool for making slideshows. It encourages the reader to get started making their own Haiku Deck presentation and sharing it on SlideShare. In just one sentence, it pitches the idea of using Haiku Deck to easily create engaging slideshows.
The President of India has given its assent to the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2019, which further amends the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2019 has been now published in the Official Gazette on 31 July 2019 as the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (the
Amendment Act).
The Amendment Act has taken into consideration the amendments that were originally notified in the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 which was promulgated by the President on 2 November 2018, and then retained in effect through the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance Act, 2019 and the Companies (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 promulgated by the President on 12 January 2019 and 21 February 2019, respectively.
Electronic Transaction Act 2063 (ETA 2063)Krishna Pandey
The Electronic Transactions Act of 2008 establishes a legal framework for electronic records and digital signatures in Nepal. Some key points:
- It recognizes the legal validity of electronic records and digital signatures.
- It establishes the role of a Controller to oversee certifying authorities and issue them licenses to issue digital certificates.
- Certifying authorities must be licensed by the Controller and may have their licenses suspended if they violate the terms.
- The act aims to authenticate electronic records, ensure their integrity and confidentiality, and regulate unauthorized access.
Corporate Udates
#SEBI
Charging of additional expenses of upto 0.20% in terms of Regulation 52 (6A) (c) of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 -
SEBI issues Circular w.r.t. Total Expense Ratio (TER)– change and disclosure which shall be applicable on All Mutual Funds/AMCs/Trustee Companies
MCA
MCA exempts Government Company from complying with Ind AS 12 for 7 years w.e.f April 2017
MCA designates Special Courts in Kerala, Odisha and Guwahati for speedy Trial of offences
TAXATION
GST: Government Notifies Postponement of E-Way Bill
CBDT has issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding taxation of long-term capital gains proposed in Finance Bill, 2018.
OTHERS
DGFT – Issues a public notice to notify the amendment in the procedure of seeking modification in IEC
Company Website-
www.acquisory.com
This document establishes rules for interpreting business property insurance policies in Oregon relating to business interruption claims from events like pandemics. It prohibits certain insurer conduct like failing to timely investigate or pay claims. Insureds can sue for actual damages if insurers violate these rules. The act takes effect immediately.
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...tonyturnerlaw
The U.S. Supreme Court approved amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that are expected to take effect on December 1, 2018. Many of the amendments are technical in nature and are intended to update bankruptcy rules related to electronic filing, appeals, judgments, and other procedural matters. Key changes include mandating electronic filing for attorneys, updating rules related to home equity loans and fees/expenses, expanding the definition of entry of judgment, and addressing bankruptcy court jurisdiction over final judgments.
Dear Professional Colleagues,
Sharing with you "Budget Updates-2019". A brief analysis of:
1. Transfer Pricing Amendments
2. Individual Taxation-Tax Incentives
3. Tax Rates
Hope you will find it useful and informative too.
Regards
CA. Reetika G Agarwal
Taxmann's Highlights of the Finance Bill, 2021 – Income TaxTaxmann
The document summarizes key proposals in the Finance Bill 2021 related to direct taxes in India. Some key points include:
1. Exemption proposed for cash allowance received in lieu of leave travel concession during COVID-19, subject to conditions.
2. Threshold for tax audit increased to Rs. 10 crore from Rs. 5 crore if at least 95% transactions are through digital modes.
3. Time limits reduced for processing ITR, notice for scrutiny and reopening assessments.
4. Faceless scheme proposed for ITAT appeals and new Dispute Resolution Committee for small taxpayers.
5. Income-tax Settlement Commission to be discontinued and replaced by Interim Board of Settlement.
This document contains answers to frequently asked questions regarding goods and services tax (GST) for drugs and pharmaceuticals.
It addresses questions about how formulations will be assessed under GST, requirements for clearance of free physician samples, procedures for movement of expired medicines, treatment of supplies to special economic zones, and whether separate registrations are required for input service distributors and units located in SEZs.
It also provides details on transitional credit that can be availed for existing stock, treatment of purchases from unregistered persons, and the effect of non-payment of consideration for supplies received.
This document outlines an addendum to a Master Services Agreement between BT and a customer for the sale and installation of video conferencing equipment. It details that BT will sell equipment and provide installation services according to customer orders. Title and risk of loss passes to the customer upon delivery. The customer must pay all applicable fees and charges and grants BT a security interest in the equipment until full payment. The only applicable warranties are those provided by the equipment manufacturers.
Types of Assessment in GST-
Self Assessment
Provisional Assessment
Scrutiny of Returns
Assessment of Non-filers
Assessment of Unregistered persons
Summary Assessment
- Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique identification number given to directors of companies in India.
- Every individual who is appointed as a director of a company must obtain a DIN by submitting an application to the Central Government.
- If there are any changes to the director's particulars submitted for DIN allotment, the director must notify the Central Government within 30 days using Form DIR-6. The Central Government will then update the director's records after verification.
This document summarizes the proceedings of a court hearing regarding the supply of Remdesivir and other essential drugs in Maharashtra during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The court notes a positive development where the central government increased Maharashtra's Remdesivir allocation to 435,000 vials based on the state's request. However, the court wants more information from Maharashtra on implementing the central order, appointing a nodal officer, and district-wise allocation.
The court also notes issues with some districts allowing private purchases of Remdesivir, and wants clarity on procurement methods. It seeks details from Maharashtra on supplies of other drugs like Ivermectin and plans to import Remdesivir from other countries.
Budget 2017-18 - analysis of direct tax proposalsoswinfo
No change in tax slabs
The rate of income tax for individuals and HUF within the slab of 2.5 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs reduced from 10% to 5%.
Additional surcharge of 10% on the tax payable by a person having total income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs but not exceeding Rs. 1 crore.
31 May Weekly Newsletter - N Pahilwani & AssociatesNitin Pahilwani
This weekly newsletter contains income tax and GST updates for the week. For income tax, it summarizes changes to ITR forms for AY 2020-21 including new schedules for investments, the launch of instant PAN through Aadhaar-based e-KYC, and notifications regarding annual information statements replacing Form 26AS. For GST, it provides updates on the GST portal including new registration options for insolvency professionals and enabling EVC filing for companies. It also summarizes some judicial rulings related to transfer of goods ownership, tax deduction at source on exempt supplies, and authority of subordinate officers.
The document discusses the various types of returns that must be filed under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. It explains returns that normal taxpayers, composition taxpayers, foreign non-residents, input service distributors, tax deductors, and e-commerce operators must file, including GSTR-1, GSTR-2, GSTR-3, GSTR-4, and others. These returns must be filed monthly or quarterly and include details of outward and inward supplies, tax payments, input tax credit, and reconciliations to ensure all transactions are recorded properly.
Taxmann's Deduction of Tax at Source with Advance Tax Taxmann
This book provides a complete and thorough analysis of the Income-tax provisions relating to deduction or collection of tax at source, advance tax, and refunds.
This book is the 33rd Edition & updated till 6th July 2020. It incorporates all the amendments listed below:
• Finance Act, 2020
• The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019
• The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020
Key features of the book are as follows:
• Information on all the interconnected provisions are provided
at a single place
• Detailed analysis of TDS and TCS provisions
• Complete analysis of the rules prescribed on TDS and TCS
provisions
• Illustrations for easy understanding of various complex
provisions
• Guidance on the controversial issues with supporting Case
Laws
• Circulars and notifications are linked with the relevant
provisions
• Forms required for meeting compliance requirements
• The list of content to quickly find the required information
The document provides an overview of various corporate, taxation, regulatory and legal updates from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and other regulatory bodies in India. Some key points include enhanced limits for related party transactions and disclosure of employee remuneration in companies, green initiatives for electronic filings with MCA, simplified amalgamation process for government companies, review of cost auditor appointment process, and clarifications regarding XBRL filing and definition of partnerships in professional acts. It also summarizes amendments related to service tax rates for restaurants and short-term accommodation, and proposals regarding life insurance and health services.
1) A report on an investigation into an incident was submitted to the court in a sealed envelope. The report stated that 4 accused had been apprehended while the 5th was absconding, and they were waiting for reports from the forensic lab and doctor on the cause of death.
2) The court directed the state government to expedite submission of the forensic report and submit a further report on March 1st.
3) The court also directed a respondent to provide details on compliance with assurances to employ spouses of the deceased and to explain prejudging the incident as an accidental fall.
4) The state government was directed to consider directions to authorities on implementing rules regarding employment as manual scavengers and
Draft rules for 16 chapters issued on september 7 2013 by mca(1)mystartupvakil.com
This document provides draft rules for 16 chapters of the Companies Act, 2013 that were issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in India for public comment. It includes definitions for key terms related to companies, rules for incorporating a One Person Company, requirements for the subscriber or member of a One Person Company to nominate another person in case of incapacity, and rules regarding related parties. The draft rules aim to provide regulations and procedures for various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
This short document promotes creating presentations using Haiku Deck, a tool for making slideshows. It encourages the reader to get started making their own Haiku Deck presentation and sharing it on SlideShare. In just one sentence, it pitches the idea of using Haiku Deck to easily create engaging slideshows.
Winning with discounters - Fifth P Industry ViewpointFifthP
This document discusses the challenges faced by suppliers from the rise of discount retailers and presents strategies for suppliers to maintain leadership in price positioning. It notes that long-term price deflation erodes profit margins and reactive short-term tactics further damage value. It recommends that suppliers establish rational price corridors between grocery and discount stores, define an effective pricing structure, understand discounters' strategies and priorities, and empower sales teams to make proactive pricing decisions.
Pricing strategy - Fifth P Industry ViewpointFifthP
1. The document discusses the need for pricing strategy to evolve into a core strategic asset for driving growth against a challenging market backdrop.
2. Currently, pricing is often too tactical and designed from the bottom-up, but it needs to change and become a strategic growth lever by developing the right price and range across the portfolio from a consumer-focused lens.
3. Leading success in pricing strategy requires taking a strategic step-change by transforming pricing into a strategic capability, developing the right prices based on consumer insights, evolving price positioning across channels, and enhancing innovation with increased commercial analysis.
This document discusses challenges facing CEOs in managing business performance and growth in a difficult industry landscape. It proposes that CEOs can cut through complexity by implementing a repeatable process to evaluate how business foundations impact growth. This includes impartially assessing capabilities, collecting qualitative team statements, and identifying the most impactful external and internal growth enablers and detractors. The outcome would be a prioritized list of issues to focus improvement programmes and achieve greater clarity on what truly drives growth. Implementing this approach could help companies effectively navigate challenges and achieve sustainable long-term growth.
This document discusses photography and composition. It explains that photography plays an important role in visual communication, as seen in magazines like National Geographic and social media. The document instructs readers to locate a photograph using at least three design elements, such as balance, color or asymmetry, and explain how these elements impact the photograph. It provides examples of resources with photographs and an example analysis discussing asymmetry, line and color in a landscape photograph.
1. The document discusses the time limits for filing liens under California law, both before and after 2013 reforms.
2. Prior to 2013, lien claimants had 6 months after learning of an industrial injury to file a lien. The reforms in 2013 changed this to 12 months and removed healthcare providers from those able to file liens.
3. For services provided for future medical treatment or where the case was settled prior to 2013, the lien filing deadlines and rules in effect at that time would apply rather than the current laws.
This short document lists the names of 6 photographers who have contributed photos: Mario Sepülveda, { pranav }, Poesia Vomitiva, HBakkali, jgoge, and kevin dooley. It concludes by encouraging the reader to create their own presentation on SlideShare.
This document summarizes a workers' compensation case involving letters sent by the applicant's attorney to three Agreed Medical Evaluators without the defendants' approval. The defendants filed a petition for removal, arguing the letters contained impermissible "information." The WCJ initially found the letters were only "communications," but then recommended removal was appropriate. The Appeals Board granted removal to determine whether the letters contained "information" requiring the defendants' approval under Labor Code section 4062.3. The Board noted removal is an extraordinary remedy, but was warranted here due to the potential for substantial prejudice and irreparable harm if biased medical evaluator reports resulted.
Haiku Deck is a presentation platform that allows users to create Haiku-style slideshows. The document encourages the reader to get started creating their own Haiku Deck presentation on SlideShare by providing a link to do so. It aims to inspire the reader to try out Haiku Deck's unique presentation style.
The document is a cover letter and resume from Balendra Prasad Pandey applying for a D.S. Manager position. The cover letter highlights his 23 years of experience in sales, operations, and management. His resume then details his educational and professional background, including current and previous roles in sales management, business development, and operations management for various consumer goods companies. It outlines his responsibilities, achievements, and qualifications for the position.
This short document promotes creating presentations using Haiku Deck, a tool for making slideshows. It encourages the reader to get started making their own Haiku Deck presentation and sharing it on SlideShare. In just one sentence, it pitches the idea of using Haiku Deck to easily create engaging slideshows.
The document discusses the rise of grocery discounters and their impact on the grocery industry. It notes that discounters are establishing themselves as the new price barometers and intensifying price competition. This is eroding profit margins across the industry as retailers pressure suppliers to further fuel the price war. The document provides strategies for suppliers to take leadership in price positioning, including establishing well-considered price corridors for their products in discounters versus grocery stores. It also recommends empowering sales teams to proactively manage pricing strategies rather than reacting to competitors.
The UR determined that codes 23412 and 23120 performed on 11/18/2015 should be reimbursed based on guidelines. The claims administrator had denied reimbursement indicating pre-authorization was required and visit limits were reached. However, the UR documentation approved the procedures performed. As documentation supported the codes, reimbursement was warranted.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the decision that the medical lien claimant's lien was barred. [The lien claimant provided medical services to the applicant from April to August 2013.] The Board found that under section 4903.5(a) of the Labor Code, the lien claimant was required to file its lien within 18 months of the last date of service in August 2013, but failed to do so. [The Board rejected the lien claimant's argument that the three-year limitation period applied instead of the 18-month period.] The 18-month limitation period enacted in January 2013 provided lien claimants with reasonable time to timely file liens for services provided on or after July 1, 2013.
Growth Enablers - Fifth P Industry ViewpointFifthP
This document discusses challenges facing businesses in managing performance in a difficult industry landscape. It outlines issues such as price deflation, increased competition, and changing consumer tastes. The document then proposes that CEOs can implement a new approach to clearly identify growth enablers versus detractors. This involves decomposing the P&L, evaluating business foundations and activities, and prioritizing the most impactful areas for change to reduce inefficiencies and drive growth. Interested parties are invited to contact the strategy consulting firm Fifth P to learn more about how they can help companies achieve clarity and implement improvement programs.
This document outlines rules for filing and serving lien claims with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board in California. Key points:
- Lien claims must be allowable under Labor Code and not filed prematurely. Medical-legal costs cannot be included as liens.
- Lien claims must be filed electronically in an approved format, include required documents like proof of service and verification, and list the correct case number.
- Supporting documentation cannot be filed with lien claims except as ordered by the Appeals Board.
- Lien claims and supporting documents must be served on injured workers, employers/carriers, and their representatives when applicable.
- Amended lien claims must be clearly marked as such and also
The new no-fault regulations in New York that take effect on April 1st aim to:
1) Prevent insurers from having to pay for medical services that were not actually provided or pay more than the established fee schedule.
2) Require healthcare providers to respond to insurers' requests for medical necessity verification within 120 days or provide justification for not doing so, to speed up the claims process.
3) Specify that technical defects in insurers' denial of claims or verification requests will not invalidate them, to reduce unnecessary litigation.
New no fault regulations to take effect april 1Rene Garcia
The new no-fault regulations in New York that take effect on April 1st aim to:
1) Prevent insurers from having to pay for medical services that were not actually provided or that exceed the fee schedule.
2) Require healthcare providers to respond to insurers' verification requests within 120 days or risk having the claim denied.
3) Specify that technical defects in insurers' documents like denials or verification requests will not invalidate them.
New no fault regulations to take effect april 1Rene Garcia
The new no-fault regulations in New York that take effect on April 1st aim to:
1) Prevent insurers from having to pay for medical services that were not actually provided or pay more than the established fee schedule.
2) Require healthcare providers to respond to insurers' requests for medical necessity verification within 120 days or provide justification for not doing so, to speed up the claims process.
3) Specify that technical defects in insurers' denial of claims or verification requests will not invalidate them, to reduce unnecessary litigation.
1) The document outlines guidelines for timely payment to contractors for construction projects, requiring public authorities to pay bills within 10 working days and provide explanations for delays.
2) It mandates establishing an online system to monitor contractor bill submission and payment for projects over Rs. 100 crore, and allows for interest charges on delayed payments over 30 days.
3) Mobilization advances of up to 10% of the contract price may be provided to contractors, to be recovered in installments secured by bank guarantees for the amount.
The document discusses the fresh start process under Indian insolvency law. Some key points:
- The fresh start process provides debt relief to individuals with small amounts of debt (below certain thresholds) so they can get a fresh start without debt obligations.
- To be eligible, an individual cannot have income over 60,000 rupees or assets over 20,000 rupees, and total qualifying debts must be below 35,000 rupees.
- An application is made to the Adjudicating Authority and a resolution professional is appointed to examine eligibility and objections.
- If approved, a 180-day moratorium is placed on debt proceedings and the individual must comply with certain requirements
Howard Ankin Presentation at ITLA Workers' Compensation SeminarAnkin Law Office, LLC
Howard Ankin gave a presentation at the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association workers’ compensation seminar on November 3, 2017. The Illinois Trial Lawyers is an association of lawyers who advocate on behalf of injured people.
The document discusses refunds under tax law. It states that a taxpayer who has paid excess tax may apply for a refund within two years of the tax assessment or payment. The Commissioner must refund any excess paid after applying it against other outstanding taxes. If a refund is not paid within three months, the taxpayer is entitled to additional compensation at the KIBOR interest rate until the refund is paid. Appeals procedures are outlined for taxpayers aggrieved by refund decisions.
This document proposes amendments to A-Engrossed Senate Bill 414. The amendments modify sections of ORS 731.256 and ORS 746.230 related to unfair claim settlement practices. Key changes include prohibiting insurers from committing unfair claim settlement practices, allowing private actions for violations, and setting standards for prompt claims investigation and settlement when liability is clear. The amendments would go into effect on January 1, 2014.
CBDT issues guidelines for stay of demand at the first appeal stageKunal Gandhi
This document modifies guidelines for granting stays of tax demands during the first appeal stage. It provides that assessing officers shall grant a stay of demand until the disposal of the first appeal if the assessee pays 15% of the disputed demand. It allows assessing officers to require higher or lower payments if certain conditions are met, and establishes a process for administrative review. Assessing officers must dispose of stay petitions within 2 weeks and attach conditions like cooperating in the appeal and reserving the right to review or adjust refunds against the demand.
The document discusses amendments made to the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act (BCIPA) in Queensland that came into effect in December 2014. Key points:
- The amendments introduced a distinction between standard payment claims (under $750k) and complex claims (over $750k) with different timeframes and processes.
- Timeframes for responding to claims and for adjudicators to make decisions were extended, especially for complex claims. This makes the overall dispute resolution process longer.
- For complex claims, respondents can now provide any reasons for withholding payment in their adjudication response, even if not previously stated.
- The number of adjudicator-related changes including fees, grading of
The document discusses the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA) in Malaysia, which establishes a statutory adjudication process to resolve payment disputes in the construction industry. CIPAA provides a mandatory, fast-track dispute resolution procedure involving the submission and response of payment claims, notices of adjudication, and adjudicator decisions within strict timeframes. The Act aims to promote prompt payment and cash flow in construction projects through an expedited, binding dispute resolution process.
The document discusses various provisions related to assessment under the GST law:
- Self-assessment is done by every registered person for a tax period as per Section 59.
- Provisional assessment allows payment of tax provisionally along with a bond and security until final assessment as per Section 60.
- Scrutiny of returns involves verification of correctness of returns filed by the proper officer as per Section 61.
- Best judgment assessment can be done by the proper officer for non-filers of returns within 5 years as per Section 62.
- Assessment of unregistered persons liable to pay tax can also be done based on best judgment as per Section 63.
- Summary assessment with
Clause 14.2 Advance Payment-Understanding Clauses in FIDIC ‘Conditions of Con...Divyanshu Dayal
•Advance payment is an interest free loan to the contractor.
•Advance payment is only paid on fulfillment of certain conditions as stipulated in the clause on receipt of a statement of an interim payment, advance guarantee and performance security.
•Advance guarantee shall remain valid until the advance payment has not been completely repaid. This repayment is done through proportional deduction in the contract price or as stipulated in the particular conditions of the contract.
•Advance payment is also linked with taking over certificate, termination of the contract and force majeure.
- The advance payment is an interest-free loan from the Employer to the Contractor to cover mobilization costs and improve cash flow. It is paid in installments upon the Contractor providing a guarantee and performance security.
- The advance payment amount and repayment terms are specified in the contract's Appendix to Tender. The payment is repaid through proportional deductions from payment certificates.
- If the advance payment is not repaid according to the contract terms, the outstanding balance becomes immediately due from the Contractor to the Employer.
This document discusses statutory and contractual adjudication in Hong Kong. It provides an overview of the development of security of payment legislation in Hong Kong, including reports and public consultations from 2001 to 2021. It outlines the application and requirements of the proposed security of payment legislation, including payment claim processes, maximum payment periods, adjudication procedures, and the adjudicator's jurisdiction. It also discusses recent proposals to implement aspects of security of payment in public works contracts prior to the enactment of legislation.
This document is a proposed bill from the North Carolina General Assembly regarding COVID-19 relief. It aims to provide economic support to North Carolinians by waiving interest on deferred tax payments, extending tax deadlines, providing flexibility for unemployment benefits and taxes, and allocating $5 million in grants for small Buncombe County businesses affected by the pandemic. It also makes some changes to the state's unemployment insurance laws.
C:\Fakepath\17262final Old Sugg Paper June09 8guestb31b11
The document provides guidance for the June 2009 Central Excise exam, including sample questions and answers. It notes that the answers are based on provisions amended by the Finance Act of 2008 and notifications/circulars issued up to October 31, 2008. It then provides a sample question from Section A of the exam and provides a detailed answer analyzing indirect tax provisions and case law.
A review of the raft of amendments under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2018 [NSW] and a discussion about their consequences with Charles Brannen, Robert Riddell and Robert Sundercombe
Similar to Ibr book time sheet-lawsheet-flowcharts[1] (20)
This document provides an overview of the California workers' compensation system process for providers, including the independent medical review (IMR) process. It explains the steps involved, from submitting a request for authorization to utilization review to the IMR process. Key points covered include who can submit authorization requests, timeframes for utilization review and IMR, and the option to resubmit a request if there is a change in medical condition. The document also discusses the disputed liability/lien process and interactions between IMR, IBR and the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.
The Division of Workers Compensation and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board have amended forms and added new requirements for lien filings to comply with recent legislation. The changes include: (1) requiring an amended lien form including a declaration affirming eligibility under penalty of perjury; (2) requiring prior lien filings that require fees to submit a declaration by July 1, 2017 describing services provided; and (3) mandating that all lien claimants file an original bill with their lien starting January 1, 2017. Additionally, a revised attorney fee disclosure statement form was made available to comply with amended requirements.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding a lien filed by Dr. Michael Newman for medical-legal reports he prepared. The primary treating physician, Dr. Massey, had designated Dr. Newman to prepare a permanent and stationary report. While Dr. Massey did not formally adopt Dr. Newman's findings until after the initial trial date, this did not preclude Dr. Newman from establishing his lien. Additionally, it was reasonable for Dr. Massey to designate a chiropractor like Dr. Newman for an evaluation, given the applicant's orthopedic injury and surgery. Finally, Dr. Newman was not required to participate in the initial trial, and properly objected when the defendant sought to
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding a lien filed by Dr. Michael Newman for medical-legal reports he prepared. The primary treating physician, Dr. Massey, had designated Dr. Newman to prepare a permanent and stationary report. While Dr. Massey did not formally adopt Dr. Newman's findings until after the initial trial date, this did not preclude Dr. Newman from establishing his lien. Additionally, it was reasonable for Dr. Massey to designate a chiropractor like Dr. Newman to evaluate the applicant's orthopedic injury. Finally, Dr. Newman was not required to participate in the initial trial and properly objected to dismissal of his lien, allowing the lien issue to
The document discusses chess pieces as metaphors for various aspects of the workers' compensation system.
The Queen represents medical-legal services, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), and petitions. The Queen has many powerful tools and is the second most important piece in the game.
The Pawn represents billing and Explanation of Review (EOR) codes. Correct billing and understanding EOR codes are important for determining the nature and extent of a case - a mistake can make a case long and drawn out while doing it right can lead to an easy win.
Mental checklists using these chess piece metaphors are important for ensuring all relevant issues are considered in encounters like phone calls, settlements,
This document provides an overview of strategic concepts for provider disputes in workers' compensation. It compares key processes like UR, IBR, MPNs, and billing to chess pieces:
- The king represents the burden of proof, as the most important piece that must be protected.
- Medical-legal services, petitions, and the WCAB are like the powerful queen that can move across the board.
- IBR is analogous to rooks for covering wide ranges but with predictable moves.
- MPN issues are like knights that can jump over other pieces with an L-shaped move.
- UR and IMR processes are surprising like bishops that move diagonally across the board.
The document discusses multiple workers' compensation cases and legal issues. It begins with a case where a lien claimant, Passages Malibu, sought reconsideration of a lower payment amount for services provided to an injured worker. It then discusses issues related to denied billing codes for psychological testing and services. Specifically, it provides context and documentation showing codes were authorized but later denied. The document ends with a discussion of denied surgical codes, with the insurer citing CCI edits and lack of proper modifiers as reasons for denial.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Ibr book time sheet-lawsheet-flowcharts[1]
1. 2013
www.workcompliens.com
Richard Boggan
INDEPENDENT BILL REVIEW
PROCESS SB 863
1. 14 PAGES QUICK REFERENCE LAW
2. TIME LINE GRAFT FOR IBR
PROCESS
3. 6 FLOWCHARTS ON IBR PROCESS
By Richard J Boggan JD at www.workcompliens.com
www.workcompliens.com
2. 1
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (a) If the provider disputes the amount of payment made by the claims administrator on
a bill for medical treatment services rendered on or after January 1, 2013, submitted pursuant to
Labor Code section 4603.2, or Labor Code section 4603.4, or bill for medical-legal expenses
incurred on or after January 1, 2013, submitted pursuant to Labor Code section 4622, the provider
may request the claims administrator to conduct a second review of the bill.
Second Review of
Medical Treatment
Bill or Medical-Legal
Bill
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (e) If the only dispute is the amount of payment and the provider does not request a
second review within the timeframes set forth in subdivision (b), the bill shall be deemed
satisfied and neither the claims administrator nor the employee shall be liable for any further
payment.
90 days to seek
second review
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (f) Within 14 days of receipt of a request for second review, the claims
administrator shall respond to the provider with a final written determination on each of the
items or amounts in dispute by issuing an explanation of review. The determination shall
contain all the information that is required to be set forth in an explanation of review under Labor
Code section 4603.3, including an explanation of the time limit to raise any further objection
regarding the amount paid for services and how to obtain independent bill review under Labor
Code section 4603.6.
14 days of receipt of
a request for second
review
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (f) (1) The 14-day time limit for responding to a request for second review may be
extended by mutual written agreement between the provider and the claims administrator.
14 days of receipt of
a request for second
review
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (f) (2) Any properly documented itemized service provided and not paid within
the timeframes described in Labor Code section 4603.2(b)(2) and (3) shall be paid at the rates
then in effect and increased by fifteen (15) percent, together with interest at the same rate as
judgments in civil actions retroactive to the date of receipt of the provider’s initial itemized billing,
if the claims administrator untimely communicates the final written determination under this
section.
14 days of receipt of
a request for second
review
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (g) Payment of any balance not in dispute shall be made within 21 days of receipt
of the request for second review.
21 days payment of
balance not in
dispute
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.5. (h) If the provider further contests the amount paid after receipt of the final written
determination following a second review, the provider shall request an independent bill review
pursuant to this Article.
30 days to seek
second review
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.6. Request for Second Review of Bill – Form Request for Second
Bill Review. DWC
Form SBR-1
Quick Reference Rules Guide To IBR Process from The Emergency Regulations
www.workcompliens.com
December 22, 2012 (14 pages)
3. 2
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. Requesting Independent Bill Review. § 9792.5.6. Request
for Second Review of
Bill – Form
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (a) If the provider further contests the amount of payment made by the claims
administrator on a bill for medical treatment services rendered on or after January 1, 2013,
submitted pursuant to Labor Code sections 4603.2 or 4603.4, or bill for medical-legal expenses
incurred on or after January 1, 2013, submitted pursuant to Labor Code section 4622, following the
second review conducted under section 9792.5.5, the provider shall request an independent bill
review. Unless consolidated under section 9792.5.12, a request for independent bill review shall
only resolve:
(1) For a bill for medical treatment services, a dispute over the amount of payment for services
billed by a single provider involving one injured employee, one claims administrator, one date of
service, and one billing code under the applicable fee schedule adopted by the Administrative
Director or, if applicable, under a contract for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section
5307.11 covering one range of effective dates.
(2) For a bill for medical-legal expenses, a dispute over the amount of payment for services billed
by a single provider involving one injured employee, one claims administrator, and one medical-
legal evaluation including supplemental reports based on that same evaluation, if any.
30 days to seek IBR
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (b) Unless as permitted by section 9792.5.12, independent bill review shall only be
conducted if the only dispute between the provider and the claims administrator is the amount of
payment owed to the provider. Any other issue, including issues of contested liability or the
applicability of a contract for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11 shall be
resolved before seeking independent bill review. Issues that are not eligible for independent bill
review shall include:
(1) The determination of a reasonable fee for services where that category of services is not
covered by a fee schedule adopted by the Administrative Director or a contract for
reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11.
(2) The proper selection of an analogous code or formula based on a fee schedule adopted by the
Administrative Director, or, if applicable, a contract for reimbursement rates under Labor
Code section 5307.11, unless the fee schedule or contract allows for such analogous coding.
Only dispute
between the provider
and the claims
administrator is the
amount of payment
owed to the provider
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (c) The request for independent bill review must be made within 30 days of:
1) The date of service of the final written determination issued by the claims administrator under
30 days to request
IBR
4. 3
www.workcompliens.com
section 9792.5.5(f), if a proof of service accompanies the final written determination.
(2) The date of receipt of the final written determination by the provider, if a proof of service does
not accompany the final written determination and the claims administrator has documentation of
receipt.
(3) The date that is five (5) calendar days after the date of the United States postmark stamped on
the envelope in which the final written determination was mailed if the final written determination
is sent by mail and there is no proof of service or documentation of receipt.
(4) The date of resolution in favor of the provider of any issue of contested liability.
(5) The date of service of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board resolving in
favor of the provider any threshold issue that would have precluded a provider’s right to receive
compensation for medical treatment services provided in accordance with Labor Code section 4600
or for medical-legal expenses defined in Labor Code section 4620.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (d)(1) The request for independent bill review shall be made in one of the
following manners:
(A) Completing and electronically submitting the online Request for Independent Bill Review
form, which can be accessed on the Internet at the Division of Workers’ Compensation’s website.
The website link for the online form can be found at https://ibr.dir.ca.gov. Electronic payment of
the required fee of $335.00 shall be made at the time the request is submitted. Electronic copies of
the documents listed in section 9792.5.9(f)(4)(A) may be submitted by the provider with the
electronic request form.
(B) Mailing the Request for Independent Bill Review form, DWC Form IBR-1, set forth in section
9792.5.8, and simultaneously paying the required fee of $335.00 as instructed on the form.
(2) The provider will include with the request form submitted under this subdivision, either
by electronic upload or by mail, a copy of the following documents:
(A) The original billing itemization;
(B) Any supporting documents that were furnished with the original billing;
(C) If applicable, the relevant contract provisions for reimbursement rates under Labor Code
section 5307.11;
(D) The explanation of review that accompanied the claims administrator’s response to the
The request for
independent bill
review shall be made
in one of the following
manners:
5. 4
www.workcompliens.com
original billing;
(E) The provider’s request for second review of the claims administrator’s original response to the
billing;
(F) Any supporting documentation submitted to the claims administrator with that request for
second review;
(G) The final written determination of the second review (explanation of review) issued by the
claims administrator to the provider.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (e) The provider may request that two or more disputes that would each constitute
a separate request for independent bill review be consolidated for a single determination under
section 9792.5.12.
Consolidated for a
single determination
under section
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.7. (f) The provider shall concurrently serve a copy of the request for independent
bill review upon the claims administrator with a copy of the supporting documents submitted
under subdivision (d). Any document that was previously provided to the claims administrator or
originated from the claims administrator need not be served if a written description of the
document and its date is served.
The provider shall
concurrently serve a
copy of the request
for independent bill
review upon the
claims administrator
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.8. Request for Independent Bill Review Form Request for
Independent Bill
Review. DWC Form
IBR-1.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9. (a) Upon receipt of the Request for Independent Bill Review under section 9792.5.7,
the Administrative Director, or his or her designee, shall conduct a preliminary review to
determine whether the request is ineligible for review. In making this determination, the
Administrative Director shall consider:
(1) The timeliness and completeness of the request;
(2) If a second request for review of the bill was completed;
(3) Whether, for a bill for medical treatment services, the medical treatment was authorized by the
claims administrator under Labor Code section 4610.
§ 9792.5.9. Initial
Review and
Assignment of
Request for
Independent Bill
Review to IBRO.
6. 5
www.workcompliens.com
(4) If the required fee for the review was not paid;
(5) Any previous or duplicate requests for independent bill review of the same bill for medical
treatment services or bill for medical-legal expenses.
(6) If the dispute between the provider and the claims administrator is ineligible under section
9792.5.7(b) or contains any other issue than the amount of payment of the bill.
(7) Other reasons, if any, that the application may be ineligible for independent bill review.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 (b) If the request appears eligible for review, the Administrative Director, or his or her
designee, shall notify the provider and the claims administrator by the most efficient means
available that request for independent bill review has been submitted and appears eligible for
assignment to an IBRO. The notification shall contain:
1) A independent bill review case or identification number;
(2) The date the Request for Independent Bill Review, DWC Form IBR-1, was received by the
Administrative Director
(3) A statement that the claims administrator may dispute eligibility for independent bill
review under subdivision (a) by submitting a statement with supporting documents, and that
the Administrative Director or his or her designee must receive the statement and supporting
documents within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date designated on the notification, if the
notification was provided by mail, or within twelve (12) calendar days of the date designated on
the notification if the notification was provided electronically
12 days / 15 days for
Claims adjuster to
object to IBR
Eligible for review
IBR
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 ( (c) Any document filed with the Administrative Director, or his or her designee, under
subdivision (b)(4) must be served on the other party. Any document that was previously
provided to the other party or originated from the other party need not be served if a written
description of the document and its date is served.
Must be served on
the other party
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 ( (d) Upon receipt of the documents requested in subdivision (b)(4), or, if no documents
have been received, upon the expiration of fifteen (15) days of the date designated on the
notification, if the notification was provided by mail, or within twelve (12) days of the date
designated on the notification if the notification was provided electronically, the Administrative
Director, or his or her designee, shall conduct a further review in order to make a determination as
to whether the request is ineligible for independent bill review under subdivision (a).
12 days / 15 days
Director, or his or her
designee, shall
conduct a further
review in order to
make a determination
7. 6
www.workcompliens.com
as to whether the
request is ineligible
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 ( (e) If the review conducted under either subdivision (a) or subdivision (c) finds that
the request is ineligible for independent bill review, the Administrative Director shall, within
fifteen (15) days following receipt of the documents requested in subdivision (b)(4) or, if no
documents are received, the expiration of the time period indicated above, issue a written
determination informing the provider and claims administrator that the request is not eligible for
independent bill review and the reasons therefor.
(1) If a request is deemed ineligible under this section, the provider shall be reimbursed the
amount of $270.00.
(2) The provider or the claims administrator may appeal an eligibility determination by the
Administrative Director by filing a petition with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and
serving a copy on all interested parties, including the Administrative Director, within 30 days of
receipt of the determination.
If a request is
deemed ineligible
under this section,
the provider shall be
reimbursed the
amount of $270.00.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 (e) If the Administrative Director or his or her designee determines from the
review conducted under subdivision (a) or (c), whichever applies, that the request is eligible
for independent bill review, the Administrative Director shall assign the request to an IBRO for
an independent bill review. Upon assignment of the request, the IBRO shall notify the parties
in writing that the request has been assigned to that organization for review. The notification
shall contain:
(1) The name and address of the IBRO;
(2) A independent bill review case or identification number;
(3) Identification of the disputed amount of payment made by the claims administrator on a bill for
medical treatment services submitted pursuant to Labor Code sections 4603.2 or 4603.4, or bill for
medical-legal expenses submitted pursuant to Labor Code section 4622,
Upon assignment of
the request, the
IBRO shall notify the
parties in writing that
the request has been
assigned to that
organization for
review.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 (f) After the assignment to the IBRO, it shall immediately assign an independent bill
reviewer who does not have any material professional, familial, or financial affiliation with any of
the individuals, institutions, facilities, services or products as described in Labor Code section
139.5 (c) (2) to review and resolve the dispute.
Assignment to the
IBRO
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.9 (g) If in course of conducting an independent bill review it is determined that the bill
reviewer assigned to the dispute has a prohibited interest as described in in Labor Code Section
139.5 (c) (2), the IBRO shall reassign the matter to a different independent bill reviewer.
Independent Bill § 9792.5.9 (h) Upon reassignment under subdivision (h), the IBRO shall immediately notify the
Administrative Director, the provider, and claims administrator of the reassignment of the
IBRO shall
8. 7
www.workcompliens.com
Review Process dispute to a different independent bill reviewer. immediately notify the
Administrative
Director, the provider,
and claims
administrator of the
reassignment of the
dispute to a different
independent bill
reviewer.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.10 (a) The independent bill reviewer assigned the request shall review all information
provided by the parties to determine if any additional information is necessary to resolve the
dispute. If the independent bill reviewer determines that additional information is necessary, the
independent bill reviewer shall contact the claims administrator and the provider in writing to
request the information.
Independent Bill
Review - Document
Filing.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.10 (b) If the independent bill reviewer requests information from either the claims
administrator or the provider, or both, the party shall file the documents with the independent bill
reviewer at the address listed in the correspondence in Section 9792.5.9(e) within 35 days of the
request, if the request is made by mail, or 32 days of the request, if the request is made
electronically. The filing party shall serve the non-filing party with the documents requested by the
independent bill reviewer.
35 days / 32 Days
IBR
Independent Bill
Review Process
(C) Except for the documents submitted under this section, and those requested under section
9792.5.12, neither the provider nor the claims administrator shall file any additional
documents with the independent bill reviewer.
Neither the provider
nor the claims
administrator shall
file any additional
documents with the
independent bill
reviewer
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.11 (a) Following the submission of all required documents under section 9792.5.10 or
9792.5.12, the provider may withdraw his or her request for independent bill review, before a
determination on the amount of payment owed, if the provider and claims administrator settle
their dispute regarding the amount of payment of the medical bill. If the provider and claims
administrator settle their dispute, they shall make a written joint request for withdrawal and serve it
on the independent bill reviewer.
Withdrawal of
Independent Bill
Review.
9. 8
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.11 (b) If a request for independent bill review is withdrawn under this section, the
provider shall not be reimbursed the fee provided with the request under section 9792.5.7(d).
Withdrawn under this
section, the provider
shall not be
reimbursed the fee
provided
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (a) With a request for independent bill review submitted under section 9792.5.7, a
provider may request combining two or more requests for independent bill review together for
the purpose of having the payment reductions contested in each request resolved in a single
determination issued under section 9792.5.14.
§ 9792.5.12.
Independent Bill
Review -
Consolidation or
Separation of
Requests.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (b) In applying this section, the following definitions shall be used:
(1) “Common issues of law and fact” means the denial or reduction of the amount of payment in
each request was made for similar reasons and arose from a similar fact pattern material to the
reason for the denial or reduction.
(2) “Delivery of similar or related services” means like or coordinated medical treatment services
or items provided to one or more injured employees.
Common issues of
law and fact
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (c) Two or more requests for independent bill review by a single provider
may be consolidated if the Administrative Director or the IBRO determines that the
requests involve common issues of law and fact or the delivery of similar or related
services.
(1) Requests for independent bill review by a single provider involving multiple dates of
medical treatment services may be consolidated and treated as one single independent bill
review request if the requests involve one injured employee, one claims administrator, and
one billing code under an applicable fee schedule adopted by the Administrative Director,
or, if applicable, under a contract for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section
5307.11, and the total amount in dispute does not exceed $4,000.00.
(2) Requests for independent bill review by a single provider involving multiple billing
Two or more
requests for
independent bill
review by a single
provider may be
consolidated
10. 9
www.workcompliens.com
codes under applicable fee schedules adopted by the Administrative Director or, if
applicable, under a contract for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11,
may be consolidated with no limit on the total dollar amount in dispute and treated as one
request if the request involves one injured employee, one claims administrator, and one
date of medical treatment service.
(3) Upon a showing of good cause and after consultation with the Administrative
Director, the IBRO may allow the consolidation of requests or independent bill review by
a single provider showing a possible pattern and practice of underpayment by a claims
administrator for specific billing codes. Requests to be consolidated under the subdivision
shall involve multiple injured employees, one claim administrator, one billing code, one
or multiple dates of service, and aggregated amounts in dispute up to $4,000.00 or
individual amounts in dispute less than $50.00 each.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (d) Upon filing a request for independent bill review under section 9792.5.7,
the provider, if requesting the consolidation of separate requests, shall, in addition to
providing the filing fee of $335.00, specify all of the requests for independent bill
review sought to be consolidated with a description of how the requests involve
common issues of law and fact or delivery of similar or related services. Once
consolidation has been granted no other disputes shall be added to the consolidated
disputes.
If requesting the
consolidation of
separate requests
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (e) The IBRO may disaggregate into separate independent bill review
requests a single request that does not meet the standards set forth in subdivision (c)
of this section. For any independent bill review request that must be disaggregated, the
same fee shall be charged for each additional independent bill review request as charged
for one independent bill review request.
(1)If an independent bill review request must be separated, the IBRO shall immediately
provide notice in writing to the provider and claims administrator stating the reasons for
disaggregation, and shall inform the provider of the additional fee or fees required to
perform the independent bill review.
(2) Within ten (10) days following receipt of the notification informing the provider of the
separation of requests, the provider shall submit to the IBRO any additional fee or fees
necessary to conduct independent bill review. The failure to provide the additional fee or
fees shall subject the request to a determination of ineligibility under section 9792.5.9.
IBRO may
disaggregate into
separate independent
bill review requests a
single request that
does not meet the
standards
11. 10
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.12 (f) Nothing in this section shall extend the time for issuing a determination
required by Labor Code section 4603.6 (e).
Nothing in this section
shall extend the time
for issuing a
determination required
by Labor Code
section 4603.6 (e).
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.13 (a) If the request for independent bill review involves the application of the
Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) for the payment of medical treatment services or
goods as defined in Labor Code section 4600, the independent bill reviewer shall apply
the provisions of sections 9789.10 to 9789.111 to determine the additional amounts, if
any, that are to be paid to the provider.
Independent Bill
Review – Review.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.13 (b) If the request for independent bill review involves the application of a
contract for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11 for the payment of
medical treatment services as defined in Labor Code section 4600, the independent bill
reviewer shall apply the contract to determine the additional amounts, if any, that are to be
paid to the provider.
IBR and Contract
Rates
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.13 (c) If the request for independent bill review involves the application of
the Medical-Legal Fee Schedule (M/L Fee Schedule) for services defined in Labor
Code section 4620, the independent bill reviewer shall apply the provisions of sections
9793-9795 and 9795.1 to 9795.4 to determine the additional amounts, if any, that are to be
paid to the provider.
independent bill
review involves the
application of the
Medical-Legal Fee
Schedule (M/L Fee
Schedule)
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.13 (d) In applying this section, the independent bill reviewer shall apply the
provisions of the OMFS, the M/L Fee Schedule, and, if applicable, the contract for
reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11, as if the bill is being
reviewed for the first time.
Apply the provisions
of the OMFS, the
M/L Fee Schedule,
and, if applicable,
the contract for
reimbursement rates
under Labor Code
section 5307.11, as if
12. 11
www.workcompliens.com
the bill is being
reviewed for the first
time.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.14. (a) Within sixty (60) days of the assignment of a dispute to an independent
bill reviewer under section 9792.5.9(f), the reviewer shall issue a written determination, in
plain language, if any additional amount of money is owed the provider under the request
for independent bill review. The determination shall state the reasons for the
determination and the information received and relied upon by the independent bill
reviewer in rendering the determination.
Independent Bill
Review -
Determination
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.14. (b) If the independent bill reviewer finds any additional amount of money is
owed to the provider, the determination shall also order the claims administrator to
reimburse the provider the amount of the filing fee in addition to any additional
payments for services found owing.
Reimburse the
provider the amount
of the filing fee in
addition to any
additional payments
for services found
owing.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.14. (c) The independent bill reviewer shall serve the determination on the
provider, the claims administrator and the Administrative Director.
Serve the
determination on the
provider, the claims
administrator and the
Administrative
Director.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.14. (d) The determination issued by the independent bill reviewer shall be
deemed to be the determination of the Administrative Director and shall be binding
on all parties.
bill reviewer shall be
deemed to be the
determination of the
Administrative
Director and shall be
binding on all
parties.
13. 12
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.15 (a) Upon receiving the determination of the Administrative Director that an
additional amount of money is owed to the provider on a bill for medical treatment
services submitted pursuant to Labor Code sections 4603.2 or 4603.4, or bill for medical-
legal expenses submitted pursuant to Labor Code section 4622, the claims administrator
shall, unless appealed under subdivision (b), pay the additional amounts set forth in the
determination per the timely payment requirements set forth in Labor Code sections
4603.2 and 4603.4.
Pay the additional
amounts set forth in
the determination per
the timely payment
requirements set forth
in Labor Code
sections 4603.2 and
4603.4.
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.15 (b) The provider or the claims administrator may appeal a determination
of the Administrative Director under section 9792.5.14 by filing a verified petition with
the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and serving a copy on all interested parties,
including the Administrative Director, within 20 days of mailing of the determination.
20 days: to Appeal
IBR
The provider or the
claims administrator
may appeal
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.15 (c) The determination of the Administrative Director shall be presumed to be
correct and shall be set aside by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board only
upon proof by clear and convincing evidence of one or more of the following grounds
for appeal:
(1) The Administrative Director acted without or in excess of his or her powers.
(2) The determination of the Administrative Director was procured by fraud.
(3) The independent bill reviewer was subject to a material conflict of interest that is in
violation of Labor Code section 139.5.
(4) The determination was the result of bias on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic
group identification, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, color, or disability.
(5) The determination was the result of a plainly erroneous express or implied finding of
fact, provided that the mistake of fact is a matter of ordinary knowledge based on the
information submitted for review and not a matter that is subject to expert opinion.
Aside by the
Workers’
Compensation
Appeals Board only
upon proof by clear
and convincing
evidence of one or
more of the following
grounds for appeal:
14. 13
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.15 (e) If the final determination of the Administrative Director is reversed
on the basis of the criteria set forth in subdivision (c), the dispute shall be remanded to
the Administrative Director. The Administrative Director shall:
(1) Submit the dispute to independent medical review by a different IBRO, if available;
(2) If a different IBRO is not available after remand, the Administrative Director shall
submit the dispute to the original IBRO for review by a different reviewer in the
organization.
If the final
determination of the
Administrative
Director is reversed
Independent Bill
Review Process
§ 9792.5.4 . Second Review and Independent Bill Review – Definitions
Independent Bill
Review Process
This section is applicable to medical treatment rendered, or medical-legal expenses
incurred, on or after January 1, 2013.
Applicable to
medical treatment
rendered, or
medical-legal
expenses incurred,
on or after January
1, 2013.
Independent Bill
Review Process
9792.5.4 (a) “Amount of payment” means the amount of money paid by the claims
administrator for either:
(1) Medical treatment services rendered by a provider or goods supplied in accordance
with Labor Code section 4600 that was authorized by Labor Code section 4610, and for
which there exists an applicable fee schedule located at sections 9789.10 to 9789.111, or
for which a contract for reimbursement rates exists under Labor Code section 5307.11.
(2) Medical-legal expenses, as defined by Labor Code section 4620, where the payment
for the services are determined by sections 9793-9795 and 9795.1-9795.4.
Amount of payment”
means the amount of
money paid by the
claims administrator
for either:
15. 14
www.workcompliens.com
IBR Process Time Sheet
(www.workcompliens.com) 12/23/2012
Flowchart Independent Bill Reviewer Procedures /Request for Second Review
12 days / 15 days
§ 9792.5.9 ( (d) Upon receipt of the documents requested in subdivision (b)(4), or, if no documents have been received, upon the expiration of fifteen (15) days of the date designated on the notification, if the notification
was provided by mail, or within twelve (12) days of the date designated on the notification if the notification was provided electronically, the Administrative Director, or his or her designee, shall conduct a further review
in order to make a determination as to whether the request is ineligible for independent bill review under subdivision (a).
9792.5.9 ( (e) If the review conducted under either subdivision (a) or subdivision (c) finds that the request is ineligible for independent bill review, the Administrative Director shall, within fifteen (15) days following
receipt of the documents requested in subdivision (b)(4) or, if no documents are received, the expiration of the time period indicated above, issue a written determination informing the provider and claims administrator
that the request is not eligible for independent bill review and the reasons therefor.
14 days
§ 9792.5.5. (f) Within 14 days of receipt of a request for second review, the claims administrator shall respond to the provider with a final written determination on each of the
items or amounts in dispute by issuing an explanation of review. The determination shall contain all the information that is required to be set forth in an explanation of review under
Labor Code section 4603.3, including an explanation of the time limit to raise any further objection regarding the amount paid for services and how to obtain independent bill review under
Labor Code section 4603.6.
§ 9792.5.5. (f) (1) The 14-day time limit for responding to a request for second review may be extended by mutual written agreement between the provider and the claims
administrator
§ 9792.5.5. (f) (2) Any properly documented itemized service provided and not paid within the timeframes described in Labor Code section 4603.2(b)(2) and (3) shall be paid at
the rates then in effect and increased by fifteen (15) percent, together with interest at the same rate as judgments in civil actions retroactive to the date of receipt of the provider’s initial
itemized billing, if the claims administrator untimely communicates the final written determination under this section.
20 days
§ 9792.5.15 (b) The provider or the claims administrator may appeal a determination of the Administrative Director under section 9792.5.14 by filing a
verified petition with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and serving a copy on all interested parties, including the Administrative Director, within 20
days of mailing of the determination.
21 days
§ 9792.5.5. (g) Payment of any balance not in dispute shall be made within 21 days of receipt of the request for second
review.
30 days
§ 9792.5.5. (h) If the provider further contests the amount paid after receipt of the final
written determination following a second review, the provider shall request an
independent bill review pursuant to this Article.
90 days
§ 9792.5.5. (e) If the only dispute is the amount of payment
and the provider does not request a second review within
the timeframes set forth in subdivision (b), the bill shall be
deemed satisfied and neither the claims administrator nor the
employee shall be liable for any further payment.
60 days
§ 9792.5.14. (a) Within sixty (60) days of the assignment of a dispute
to an independent bill reviewer under section 9792.5.9(f), the
reviewer shall issue a written determination
16. 15
www.workcompliens.com
Emergency Regulation
www.workcompliens.com
Flowchart Part 1 of 5
Form Provider’s Request for Second Bill Review
If the provider disputes the amount of payment made by the claims administrator on a bill for
medical treatment services rendered on or after January 1, 2013, the provider may request the
claims administrator to conduct a second review of the bill. (§ 9792.5.5)
§ 9792.5.5 (b) The second review must be requested within 90 days of:
(A) The date of receipt of the explanation of review by the provider is deemed the date of
service, if a proof of service does not accompany the explanation of review and the claims
administrator has documentation of receipt.
(B) If the explanation of review is sent by mail and if in the absence of a proof of service or
documentation of receipt, the date of service is deemed to be five (5) calendar days after the
date of the United States postmark stamped on the envelope in which the explanation of
review was mailed.
(1) The date of service
of the explanation of
review provided by a
claims administrator in
conjunction with the
payment, adjustment, or
denial of the initially
submitted bill, if a
proof of service
accompanies the
explanation of review.
§ 9792.5.5 (b) (2)
The date of service
of an order of the
Workers’
Compensation
Appeal Board
resolving any
threshold issue that
would preclude a
provider’s right to
receive
compensation for the
submitted bill.
§ 9792.5.5 (e) If the only
dispute is the amount of
payment and the provider
does not request a second
review within the timeframes
set forth in subdivision (b),
the bill shall be deemed
satisfied and neither the
claims administrator nor the
employee shall be liable for
any further payment.
§ 9792.5.5 (f) Within 14 days of receipt of a request for
second review, the claims administrator shall respond to the
provider with a final written determination on each of the
items or amounts in dispute by issuing an explanation of
review. The determination shall contain all the information
that is required to be set forth in an explanation of review
under Labor Code section 4603.3, including an explanation
of the time limit to raise any further objection regarding the
amount paid for services and how to obtain independent bill
review under Labor Code section 4603.6.
(1) The 14-day time limit for responding to a request for
second review may be extended by mutual written
agreement between the provider and the claims
administrator.
(2) Any properly documented itemized service provided
and not paid within the timeframes described in Labor
Code section 4603.2(b)(2) and (3) shall be paid at the
rates then in effect and increased by fifteen (15) percent,
together with interest at the same rate as judgments in
civil actions retroactive to the date of receipt of the
provider’s initial itemized billing, if the claims
administrator untimely communicates the final written
determination under this section.
§ 9792.5.5 (g) Payment of any balance not in dispute shall be made
within 21 days of receipt of the request for second review.
(h) If the provider further contests the amount paid after receipt of
the final written determination following a second review, the
provider shall request an independent bill review pursuant to this
Article.
§ 9792.5.6. Request for Second Review of Bill – Form
Request for Second Bill Review. DWC Form SBR-1.
17. 16
www.workcompliens.com
Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process Under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
www.workcompliens.com
(B) Mailing the
Request for
Independent Bill
Review form, DWC
Form IBR-1, set
forth in section
9792.5.8, and
simultaneously
paying the required
fee of $335.00 as
instructed on the
form.
§ 9792.5.7 (d)(1) The request for independent bill
review shall be made in one of the following manners:
(A) Completing and
electronically submitting the
online Request for Independent
Bill Review form, which can be
accessed on the Internet at the
Division of Workers’
Compensation’s website. The
website link for the online form
can be found at
https://ibr.dir.ca.gov. Electronic
payment of the required fee of
$335.00 shall be made at the
time the request is submitted.
Electronic copies of the
documents listed in section
9792.5.9(f)(4)(A) may be
submitted by the provider with
the electronic request form.
Requesting Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process Under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
§ 9792.5.7 (b) Only Issues of IBR amount of
payment owed to the provider.------Issues that are
not eligible for independent bill review:
(1) The determination of a reasonable fee
for services where that category of
services is not covered by a fee schedule
adopted by the Administrative Director or
a contract for reimbursement rates under
Labor Code section 5307.11.
(2) The proper selection of an analogous
code or formula based on a fee schedule
adopted by the Administrative Director, or,
if applicable, a contract for reimbursement
rates under Labor Code section 5307.11,
unless the fee schedule or contract allows
for such analogous coding.
§ 9792.5.7 (c) The request for
independent bill review must be made
within 30 days of:
(1) The date of service of the final written
determination issued by the claims
administrator under section 9792.5.5(f), if a
proof of service accompanies the final
written determination.
(2) The date of receipt of the final written
determination by the provider, if a proof of
service does not accompany the final written
determination and the claims administrator
has documentation of receipt.
(3) The date that is five (5) calendar days
after the date of the United States postmark
stamped on the envelope in which the final
written determination was mailed if the final
written determination is sent by mail and
there is no proof of service or
documentation of receipt.
(4) The date of resolution in favor of the
provider of any issue of contested liability.
(5) The date of service of an order of the
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board
resolving in favor of the provider any
threshold issue that would have precluded a
provider’s right to receive compensation for
medical treatment services provided in
accordance with Labor Code section 4600
or for medical-legal expenses defined in
Labor Code section 4620.
§ 9792.5.7 (e) The provider may request that two
or more disputes that would each constitute a
separate request for independent bill review be
consolidated for a single determination under
section 9792.5.12.
§ 9792.5.7 (f) The provider shall concurrently serve a copy of the request for independent bill review
upon the claims administrator with a copy of the supporting documents submitted under subdivision (d).
Any document that was previously provided to the claims administrator or originated from the claims
administrator need not be served if a written description of the document and its date is served.
§ 9792.5.8. Request for Independent Bill Review Form
18. 17
www.workcompliens.com
Flowchart Part 2 of 5
Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
www.workcompliens.com
After Requesting Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process Under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
§ 9792.5.9. Initial Review and Assignment of
Request for Independent Bill Review to IBRO
(1) The timeliness and completeness of the request;
(2) If a second request for review of the bill was
completed;
(3) Whether, for a bill for medical treatment services,
the medical treatment was authorized by the claims
administrator under Labor Code section 4610.
(4) If the required fee for the review was not paid;
(5) Any previous or duplicate requests for
independent bill review of the same bill for medical
treatment services or bill for medical-legal expenses.
(6) If the dispute between the provider and the claims
administrator is ineligible under section 9792.5.7(b)
or contains any other issue than the amount of
payment of the bill.
(7) Other reasons, if any, that the application may be
ineligible for independent bill review.
§ 9792.5.9 (a) Upon receipt of the Request for
Independent Bill Review under section 9792.5.7,
the Administrative Director, or his or her designee,
shall conduct a preliminary review to determine
whether the request is ineligible for review. In
making this determination, the Administrative
Director shall consider:
§ 9792.5.9 (b) If the request appears
eligible for review, the Administrative
Director, or his or her designee, shall
notify the provider and the claims
administrator by the most efficient
means available that request for
independent bill review has been
submitted and appears eligible for
assignment to an IBRO. The
notification shall contain:
(1) A independent bill review case or
identification number;
(2) The date the Request for
Independent Bill Review, DWC Form
IBR-1, was received by the
Administrative Director
(3) A statement that the claims
administrator may dispute eligibility
for independent bill review under
subdivision (a) by submitting a
statement with supporting documents,
and that the Administrative Director
or his or her designee must receive
the statement and supporting
documents within fifteen (15)
calendar days of the date designated
on the notification, if the notification
was provided by mail, or within
twelve (12) calendar days of the date
designated on the notification if the
notification was provided
electronically.
§ 9792.5.9 (e) If the review conducted under either subdivision (a) or
subdivision (c) finds that the request is ineligible for independent bill
review, the Administrative Director shall, within fifteen (15) days
following receipt of the documents requested in subdivision (b)(4) or,
if no documents are received, the expiration of the time period
indicated above, issue a written determination informing the provider
and claims administrator that the request is not eligible for
independent bill review and the reasons therefor.
(1) If a request is deemed ineligible under this section, the provider
shall be reimbursed the amount of $270.00.
(2) The provider or the claims administrator may appeal an eligibility
determination by the Administrative Director by filing a petition with
the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and serving a copy on all
interested parties, including the Administrative Director, within 30
days of receipt of the determination.
§ 9792.5.9 (e) If the Administrative Director or his or her designee
determines from the review conducted under subdivision (a) or (c),
whichever applies, that the request is eligible for independent bill
review, the Administrative Director shall assign the request to an IBRO
for an independent bill review. Upon assignment of the request, the
IBRO shall notify the parties in writing that the request has been
assigned to that organization for review. The notification shall contain:
(1) The name and address of the IBRO;
(2) A independent bill review case or identification number;
(3) Identification of the disputed amount of payment made by the
claims administrator on a bill for medical treatment services submitted
pursuant to Labor Code sections 4603.2 or 4603.4, or bill for medical-
legal expenses submitted pursuant to Labor Code section 4622,
19. 18
www.workcompliens.com
Flowchart Part 3 of 5
Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
www.workcompliens.com
After the assignment to the IBRO
§ 9792.5.9 (f) After the assignment to the
IBRO, it shall immediately assign an
independent bill reviewer who does not
have any material professional, familial, or
financial affiliation with any of the
individuals, institutions, facilities, services
or products as described in Labor Code
section 139.5 (c) (2) to review and resolve
the dispute.
Bill reviewer assigned to the
dispute has a prohibited interest
§ 9792.5.9 (g) If in course of conducting an
independent bill review it is determined
that the bill reviewer assigned to the
dispute has a prohibited interest as
described in in Labor Code Section 139.5
(c) (2), the IBRO shall reassign the matter
to a different independent bill reviewer.
§ 9792.5.9 (h) Upon reassignment under
subdivision (h), the IBRO shall
immediately notify the Administrative
Director, the provider, and claims
administrator of the reassignment of the
dispute to a different independent bill
reviewer.
§ 9792.5.10 (a) The independent bill
reviewer assigned the request shall review
all information provided by the parties to
determine if any additional information is
necessary to resolve the dispute. If the
independent bill reviewer determines that
additional information is necessary, the
independent bill reviewer shall contact the
claims administrator and the provider in
writing to request the information.
If the independent bill reviewer requests
information from either the claims administrator or
the provider, or both§
9792.5.10 (b) If the independent bill reviewer
requests information from either the claims
administrator or the provider, or both, the party
shall file the documents with the independent bill
reviewer at the address listed in the correspondence
in Section 9792.5.9(e) within 35 days of the
request, if the request is made by mail, or 32 days
of the request, if the request is made electronically.
The filing party shall serve the non-filing party with
the documents requested by the independent bill
reviewer.
§ 9792.5.10 (C) Except for the documents
submitted under this section, and those requested
under section 9792.5.12, neither the provider nor
the claims administrator shall file any additional
documents with the independent bill reviewer.
§ 9792.5.11. Withdrawal of Independent Bill Review.
(a) Following the submission of all required documents under section
9792.5.10 or 9792.5.12, the provider may withdraw his or her request for
independent bill review, before a determination on the amount of payment
owed, if the provider and claims administrator settle their dispute regarding
the amount of payment of the medical bill. If the provider and claims
administrator settle their dispute, they shall make a written joint request for
withdrawal and serve it on the independent bill reviewer.
(b) If a request for independent bill review is withdrawn under this section,
the provider shall not be reimbursed the fee provided with the request
under section 9792.5.7(d).
§ 9792.5.14. Independent Bill Review - Determination
(a) Within sixty (60) days of the assignment of a dispute to
an independent bill reviewer under section 9792.5.9(f), the
reviewer shall issue a written determination, in plain
language, if any additional amount of money is owed the
provider under the request for independent bill review. The
determination shall state the reasons for the determination
and the information received and relied upon by the
independent bill reviewer in rendering the determination.
§ 9792.5.14 (b) If the independent bill reviewer finds any
additional amount of money is owed to the provider, the
determination shall also order the claims administrator to
reimburse the provider the amount of the filing fee in
addition to any additional payments for services found
owing.
§ 9792.5.14 (c) The independent bill reviewer shall serve the
determination on the provider, the claims administrator and
the Administrative Director.
§ 9792.5.14 (d) The determination issued by the independent
bill reviewer shall be deemed to be the determination of the
Administrative Director and shall be binding on all parties.
20. 19
www.workcompliens.com
Flowchart Part 4 of 5
Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
www.workcompliens.com
§ 9792.5.12. Independent Bill Review - Consolidation or Separation of Requests
§ 9792.5.12(a) With a request for
independent bill review submitted under
section 9792.5.7, a provider may request
combining two or more requests for
independent bill review together for the
purpose of having the payment reductions
contested in each request resolved in a single
determination issued under section
9792.5.14.
§ 9792.5.12 (b) In applying this section, the
following definitions shall be used:
(1) “Common issues of law and fact” means
the denial or reduction of the amount of
payment in each request was made for similar
reasons and arose from a similar fact pattern
material to the reason for the denial or
reduction.
(2) “Delivery of similar or related services”
means like or coordinated medical treatment
services or items provided to one or more
injured employees.
§ 9792.5.12 (c) Two or more requests for independent bill
review by a single provider may be consolidated if the
Administrative Director or the IBRO determines that the
requests involve common issues of law and fact or the
delivery of similar or related services.
(1) Requests for independent bill review by a single
provider involving multiple dates of medical treatment
services may be consolidated and treated as one single
independent bill review request if the requests involve one
injured employee, one claims administrator, and one billing
code under an applicable fee schedule adopted by the
Administrative Director, or, if applicable, under a contract
for reimbursement rates under Labor Code section 5307.11,
and the total amount in dispute does not exceed $4,000.00.
(2) Requests for independent bill review by a single
provider involving multiple billing codes under applicable
fee schedules adopted by the Administrative Director or, if
applicable, under a contract for reimbursement rates under
Labor Code section 5307.11, may be consolidated with no
limit on the total dollar amount in dispute and treated as one
request if the request involves one injured employee, one
claims administrator, and one date of medical treatment
service.
§ 9792.5.12 (d) Upon filing a request for independent bill review
under section 9792.5.7, the provider, if requesting the
consolidation of separate requests, shall, in addition to providing
the filing fee of $335.00, specify all of the requests for
independent bill review sought to be consolidated with a
description of how the requests involve common issues of law
and fact or delivery of similar or related services. Once
consolidation has been granted no other disputes shall be added
to the consolidated disputes.
§ 9792.5.12 (e) The IBRO may disaggregate into separate independent bill review requests a single request that does not meet the standards set forth in subdivision (c) of this section. For any
independent bill review request that must be disaggregated, the same fee shall be charged for each additional independent bill review request as charged for one independent bill review request.
(1) If an independent bill review request must be separated, the IBRO shall immediately provide notice in writing to the provider and claims administrator stating the reasons for disaggregation,
and shall inform the provider of the additional fee or fees required to perform the independent bill review.
(2) Within ten (10) days following receipt of the notification informing the provider of the separation of requests, the provider shall submit to the IBRO any additional fee or fees necessary to
conduct independent bill review. The failure to provide the additional fee or fees shall subject the request to a determination of ineligibility under section 9792.5.9.
§ 9792.5.12 (f) Nothing in this section shall extend the time for issuing a determination required by Labor Code section 4603.6 (e).
§ 9792.5.12 (c) (3) Upon a showing of good cause and after
consultation with the Administrative Director, the IBRO may
allow the consolidation of requests or independent bill review by
a single provider showing a possible pattern and practice of
underpayment by a claims administrator for specific billing
codes. Requests to be consolidated under the subdivision shall
involve multiple injured employees, one claim administrator, one
billing code, one or multiple dates of service, and aggregated
amounts in dispute up to $4,000.00 or individual amounts in
dispute less than $50.00 each.
21. 20
www.workcompliens.com
Flowchart Part 5 of 5
Independent Bill Review (IBR) Process under Emergency Regulations / SB 863
www.workcompliens.com
(1) The Administrative Director acted without or in excess of his or her powers.
(2) The determination of the Administrative Director was procured by fraud.
(3) The independent bill reviewer was subject to a material conflict of interest that is in violation of Labor Code section 139.5.
(4) The determination was the result of bias on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, color, or
disability.
(5) The determination was the result of a plainly erroneous express or implied finding of fact, provided that the mistake of fact is a matter of ordinary knowledge
based on the information submitted for review and not a matter that is subject to expert opinion.
§ 9792.5.15 (b) The provider or the claims administrator may appeal a determination of the Administrative Director under section
9792.5.14 by filing a verified petition with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and serving a copy on all interested parties,
including the Administrative Director, within 20 days of mailing of the determination.
§ 9792.5.15 (e) If the final determination of the Administrative Director is reversed on the basis of the criteria set forth in subdivision (c), the dispute shall be remanded to
the Administrative Director. The Administrative Director shall:
(1) Submit the dispute to independent medical review by a different IBRO, if available;
(2) If a different IBRO is not available after remand, the Administrative Director shall submit the dispute to the original IBRO for review by a different reviewer in the
organization.
§ 9792.5.15 (c) The determination of the Administrative Director shall be presumed to be correct and shall be set
aside by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board only upon proof by clear and convincing evidence of one or
more of the following grounds for appeal: