Downloaded 624 times
Uploaded byAndrew Turner
How Neogeography Killed GIS
This document discusses how neogeography has challenged traditional GIS by being more user-centric and focused on personal interaction with place through new technologies. Neogeography empowers users to define their world through location-based applications, social networks, mobile devices, and personal analytics. It has increased accessibility of geospatial data and tools. While GIS remains important infrastructure, neogeography indicates a need for the GIS community to engage more with users, offer expertise without lecturing, and collaborate to solve problems around findability, portability, privacy, accuracy, and interaction. Working together, GIS professionals and neogeographers can build a positive future.
More Related Content
Similar to How Neogeography Killed GIS
How Neogeography Killed GIS
- 1. How Neogeography Andrew Turner @ajturner Killed GIS
- 2. “GIS is dead.” Tim Bowden Mapforge Geospatial @ FOSS4G 2007
- 3. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 4. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 5. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 6. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 7. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 8. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 9. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 10. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 11. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 12. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 13. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 14. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 15. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 16. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 17. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 18. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 19. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 20. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 21. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 22. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 23. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 24. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 25. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 26. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 27. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 28. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 29. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 30. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 31. A Brief HistoryLesson
- 33.
- 34. and how itdied
- 35.
- 36. Trends Connected, Hyperlinked Realtime Two-way conversations Personalized Riseof the ‘amateur’ reporter Syndication and Aggregation Lack of innovation
- 37.
- 38. Traditional Paradigms failed, and so did the industry
- 39. Not a Good Outcome
- 40.
- 41. Peter talked aboutall the great technologies
- 42. Functionality Future GIS Server OSGeo Increasing Accessibility GIS Open Tools Money + Time Cost Geospatial Trend
- 43.
- 44. Adaptx vs. WalkingPapers
- 45. Ordnance Survey vs.OpenStreetMap
- 46.
- 47. Traditional Stack Complicated www.cookbook.hlurb.gov.ph
- 48.
- 49. What is thekey difference between GIS and Neogeography?
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
- 53.
- 55.
- 56. Neogeography is about
- 57. Neogeography is about personal interaction
- 58. Neogeography is about personal interaction with place
- 59. “ The technology isbringing people closer to to their worlds and empowering them to define a future that reflects their values, hopes and dreams. ”
- 60. “ The technology isbringing people closer to to their worlds and empowering them to define a future that reflects their values, hopes and dreams. ” Jack Dangermond
- 61. The New Compass 560 million GPS enabled handsets by 2012
- 62.
- 63. Media & Entertainment Location-Based Going on Locative Games Vacation Art
- 64. Mobile Consumers Social Augmented Banking Networks Reality
- 65. Personal Analytics Where I Government Hyperlocal Live Engagement News
- 66. GIS is acommodity. Part of the infrastructure.
- 69. How to alterthe future-past
- 70. How ‘GISers’ see‘neogeographers’ flickr: diskostu
- 71. How ‘neogeographers’ see‘GISers’
- 72. How ‘neogeographers’ see‘GISers’ they don’t
- 73. We’re from theInternet...
- 74. An Allegory ofa Man
- 75. Neural Network LearningApplied to Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics Control Systems
- 76. GOCE Spacecraft -Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer
- 77. Convergence of Blogs,Digital Media, Consumer GPS and Mobile, Internet enabled devices
- 78. Explain it in meaningfulterms Trip Mapping Friend Finding House Planning GeoGenealogy
- 79. Build tools and components GeoRSS KML
- 80.
- 81. Where the peopleare going
- 82. Reach out intotheir communities.
- 83. Reach out intotheir communities. Engage.
- 84. Offer insight andexpertise.
- 85. Offer insight andexpertise. Don’t lecture.
- 86.
- 87. Collaborate. Build.
- 88. “We” need towork together Gartner: July 2009
- 89. “We” need towork together Gartner: July 2009
- 90. “We” need towork together Gartner: July 2009
- 91. “We” need towork together “We” means more than the people in this audience Gartner: July 2009
- 92. There are alot of problems we need to solve
- 93.
- 94.
- 95. flickr:cardopoli Privacy - Obfuscation
- 96. Accuracy, Precision -Reliability, Quality
- 97. flickr: smb_flickr Conflation -Linked Data
- 98.
- 99. Lets change thefuture
- 100. Plenary Session: “How citizensconnected with place to change the world.”
- 102. Let’s Build aNew Future Together Andrew Turner - @ajturner andrew@fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com