My essay on the topic "How far did technology influence the outcome of the Iran-Iraq war". It is an assignment for SL History IB at UWC Adriatic.
Over 30 hours spent on research and writing. I hope you enjoy reading it and learn something new.
It englights the era of Iraq under the leadership of Saddam hussein untill he was executed. I have analysed Saddam's tenure including Iran-Iraq war, both Gulf wars and Substance of Anarchy embedled in Iraq while scrutinizes his policies and Baa'th agenda.
The war in Yemen has created another humanitarian catastrophe, wrecking a country that was already the poorest in the Arab world. With millions of people now on the brink of famine, the need for a comprehensive cease-fire and political settlement is ever more urgent. Yemenis have suffered tremendous hardships from air bombardments, rocket attacks, and economic blockades. According to the U.N., approximately 4,000 civilians have been killed, the majority in Saudi-led coalition airstrikes. All parties to the conflict stand accused of war crimes, including indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas .
American history: persian gulf war (1990 1991). Operation desert stormAlex Rayón Jerez
Presentation done on June 2009 during my year in the USA in the context of the debates and presentations I took part on with my fellow friend (RIP) and always in mind Ron Mullholand. It treats one of the latest chapter in the American history: the first Persian Gulf War.
It englights the era of Iraq under the leadership of Saddam hussein untill he was executed. I have analysed Saddam's tenure including Iran-Iraq war, both Gulf wars and Substance of Anarchy embedled in Iraq while scrutinizes his policies and Baa'th agenda.
The war in Yemen has created another humanitarian catastrophe, wrecking a country that was already the poorest in the Arab world. With millions of people now on the brink of famine, the need for a comprehensive cease-fire and political settlement is ever more urgent. Yemenis have suffered tremendous hardships from air bombardments, rocket attacks, and economic blockades. According to the U.N., approximately 4,000 civilians have been killed, the majority in Saudi-led coalition airstrikes. All parties to the conflict stand accused of war crimes, including indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas .
American history: persian gulf war (1990 1991). Operation desert stormAlex Rayón Jerez
Presentation done on June 2009 during my year in the USA in the context of the debates and presentations I took part on with my fellow friend (RIP) and always in mind Ron Mullholand. It treats one of the latest chapter in the American history: the first Persian Gulf War.
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TRUMAN'S CONTAINMENT POLICY. Content: Truman's containment policy, key policy, key terms, containment definition, George Kennan, USA's presidents and the containment policy, human rights vs anti-communism, the X-Article, countering soviet pressure, controversy, Dulles and Nitze, expansion of US military budget.
The Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both non-violent and violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab world that began on 18 December 2010 and spread throughout the countries of the Arab League and surroundings.
CAMBRIDGE A2 HISTORY: TRUMAN'S CONTAINMENT POLICY. Content: Truman's containment policy, key policy, key terms, containment definition, George Kennan, USA's presidents and the containment policy, human rights vs anti-communism, the X-Article, countering soviet pressure, controversy, Dulles and Nitze, expansion of US military budget.
The Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both non-violent and violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab world that began on 18 December 2010 and spread throughout the countries of the Arab League and surroundings.
Summary of:
Walsh, BEN "IGCSE Modern World History" (Hodder Education - 2013)
Cantrell, Smith, Smith, Ennion "20th Century History for Cambridge IGCSE" (Oxford University Press - 2013)
Google Images
Anthony H. Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies delivered a lecture at the CIRS Panel "Iraq in the Balance: Security and Democracy After the U.S. Troop Withdrawal"
As the 21st Century dawns, warfare is in the midst of revolutionary change. Information Age warfare characterized by knowledge, speed, and precision is slowly supplanting Industrial Age war and its reliance on mass. The advent of precision firepower is but the first tremor of this tectonic shift. As it reverberates around the globe, the Precision Firepower Military Technical Revolution will dramatically increase the lethality and reach of defensive fires. Unless the means
for offensive maneuver adapt to overcome the greatly enhanced power of the defense, future soldiers will face stalemate and indecision much like their forefathers confronted in 1914.
Love and revenge in Emily Bronte's "Wuthering Heights"Kliment Serafimov
My essay for my English Literature Class on the topic "Discuss revenge in Emily Brontë’s "Wuthering Heights". In what way is the love connected? What is the nature of love in the novel, that it can be so closely connected to vengeance?". Quotes included
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales
Technology used in the Iran-Iraq war
1. How far did technology influence the outcome of the Iran-Iraq war?
War and technology have always been linked together. More precisely, without technology a war
cannot be fought. Since the earliest of civilizations, man has always been looking how to improve the
effectiveness when killing his own kind. With research and investment in war technology he has
never stopped improving that effectiveness.Military technology, which is a collection of equipment,
vehicles, structures and communication systems that are designed for the use in warfare1
, is
indisputably important in determining the outcome of war. However, the importance of other
factors such as manpower, quantity of weapons, strategic intelligence, terrain, third party influence
among other things can’t be underestimated in analyzing an outcome of war. In other words, sole
technological superiority is not likely to fully determine the outcome of a war; however, it is
definitely one of the main factors when tackling the equation of war. Nothing is different in the Iran-
Iraq war, the difference in technological readiness is important throughout the whole war, but it is
not the driving factor of its outcome. This essay will take a closer look at the extent to which the
difference in military technology possessed by both countriesinfluenced the outcome of the Iran-
Iraq war.
In order to understand the outcome of the war and how it came to it, the preceding events have to
be examined first. The war started on the 22nd
of September 1980 with full Iraqi invasion of Iran. The
invasion started with the Iraqi air force attacking Iranian air fields. Iraq used few Soviet MiG-23BN jet
fighters, Tu-20 bombers and Su-17 attack aircraft. However,the attack was not considered successful
since most of the Iranian planes were safely shielded in protective aircraft hangers and some of the
Iraqi bombs either completely missed their targets or malfunctioned. Reasons for the failure include
inexperience of the Iraqi pilots and technical problems in the Soviet equipment2
. Despite the failure,
the Iraqi ground forces moved rapidly into Iranian territory, focusing on an area located in province
of Khuzestan bounded by the cities of Khorramshahr, Ahvaz, Susangrd and Musian3
. The Iraqi aerial
attack was retaliated the very next day (23rd
of September 1980) by Iran which launched Operation
Kaman 99. In the operation Iran launched the full strength of its aerial arsenal which included 58 F-4
Phantom IIs, 88 F-5 Tigers IIs and 60 F-14 Tomcats. These airplanes were supplied by the USA before
the Iranian revolution. The F-4s and F-5s were directed towards Iraqi air to damage or destroy
several locations of strategic importance, such as Iraqi areal bases, oil refineries, and several cities;
while the tomcats were scattered across Iranian airspace in case of possible Iraqi retaliation. Despite
both sides suffering roughly the same amount of losses in planes, Iran managed to do more damage
to the Iraqi areal bases. According to Iran, Iraq’s aerial efficacy was reduced by 55% declaring the
operation a successful one4
.This, in term allowed Iran to have further air raid on key cities, economic
and strategic locations. An example of this, were the 8 air raids carried over Bagdad on October 1st
.
Adding to its air superiority, Iran also had some successes on ground and at sea in terms of pushing
Iraq back within its border. The ground troops in the time frame between mid-November 1981 and
1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_technology
2
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 49)
3
Efraim Karsh, The Iran – Iraq War 1980-1988, Osprey Publishing, 2010 (p. 23)
4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Kaman_99
2. May1982 launched 3 phases of counter offensives that eventually drove the war front back to the
border. Important aspect from a technological point of view in these offensives wasthe use of
helicopters (most notable was the use of around 120 USA purchased Boeing Ch-47 Chinooks and Ah-
1 Cobra Helicopter gunships) to cut through Iraqi defense lines. Also, a significant impact had the
extensive use of Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPG-7s)in which Iran became self-sufficient of during
the war. The RPGs made Iraqi armored advancement costly and by the end of the May 1982 Iraq had
lost more than half of its armored vehicles and tanks. However, Iran was inferior in terms of
numbers when it came to armored vehicles and tanks and suffered even greater losses than Iraq56
.
At sea Iran also became dominant with Operation Morvarid in which Iran managed to destroy 80%
of Iraqi navy and all of Iraqi radar sites. In the operation, Iran utilized its navy (using 6 amphibious
vessels and 2 missile boats) and air force (using F-4s, F-5s and F-14 aircraft, with Ah-1J Sea Cobras,
Bell 214s and Ch-47C Chinooks helicopters) which proved superior, despite losing 1 missile boat and
1 F-4 plane7
.
Although, the importance of the Iranian technological and weapon superiority cannot be
underestimated, several other factors also contributed towards the Iranians pushing the Iraqi forces
out of Iran. One can argue that the main factor of this was from a strategic point of view, not so
much weakness in the Iraqi forces, but rather errors in the campaign plan itself that contributed
towards Iran outplaying Iraq in battles. Another reason may be the misjudgment of the Iraqi
leadership, namely Saddam Hussein, who expected the Iranians to negotiate as soon as Iraq made
limited incursion into Iran. His expectation was unrealistic, since Iraq did not mark a decisive victory,
nor reach any of its objectives8
. Moreover, the Iraqis failed because Iran’s ground forces and
resistance was more motivated and better trained, later accompanied by a mass of less trained but
highly motivated ‘volunteers’ that wanted to help defend their country. At the point when Iran
crossed into Iraq, Iran’s soldiers counted 350000 in contrast to Iraq’s 175000. While at the onset of
the war the numbers were 150000 active personnel for Iran and 350000 soldiers for Iraq.
Theseeventsdid not have a direct impact on the outcome of the war, but rather serve as a
comparison basis for the war situation over the next 6 years. With the analysis so far, it can be
established that Iran should have won the war under the status quo when Iran managed to cross
over to Iraq, because of the same reasons that allowed Iran to fight back after the Iraqi invasion.
However, this was not the case.The decisive battles and events of the war happened during the last
2 years (1987-1988). A series of Iranian failed offensives and Iraqi won counter-offensive strategies
drove Iran and Iraq on the negotiating table at the United Nations Security Consul. They signed
Resolution 598 leading to the 20th
August 1988 cease-fire. According to some interpretations, the
war was won by Iraq, while according to other interpretations, it ended in a draw. This means that
some other factors must have changed or influenced the course of the war during the mid-war
period (1982-1987). These factors include foreign investment, change of tactics and recruitment of
new soldiers.
As soon as Iran crossed into Iraqi territory in 1982, military and financial aid dramatically increased
for Iraq. This aid was mainly coming from the USA, USSR, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, UK,
5
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 49 – p.66)
6
Efraim Karsh, The Iran – Iraq War 1980-1988, Osprey Publishing, 2010 (p. 23-p.29)
7
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Morvarid
8
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 56)
3. UAE, South Africa, West Germany and France.With this help Iraq managed to strengthen its aerial
arsenal, restore its navy, increase its defenses and improve its offensive weapons arsenal. Some of
the newly acquired weapons included: T-55 and T-62 tanks, BM-21 truck mounted rocket launchers
and Mi-24 helicopter gunships. All these weapons began to overtake, or at least match the quality
and size of their Iranian counterparts. Furthermore during the middle of the war, Iraq managed to
double the size of its army totaling 560000 soldiers9
. These increases in firepower and manpower,
backed up by deep and long defense lines, including trenches, minefields, marshlands, rivers,
concrete block fields, highland gun positions and so on, all contributed to the stalemate that was
more or less the situation during the period 1982-1987. The stalemate was also a product of the
change in Iraqi tactics; they started a war of attrition, which included the ‘war of the cities’ and the
‘tanker war’. While Iraq took a more defensive stance, Iran continued with its extensive offensives.
Iran managed to plan and execute around 60 more offensives after 1982, most of them either not
contributing at all towards Iranian advance, or just slightly breaking the Iraqi defense lines. The
change of velocity of the advancement of the Iranian army was due to the influence of the superior
foreign aid that Iraq had, which increased its technological superiority. The Iranian low-tech
strategies, which included human waves of poorly trained (but highly motivated) soldiersto take the
initial hits of the offensives,could not continue to cope with the Iraqi increase in performance. As the
war continued, Iran was becoming more desperate for heavy weapons such as aircraft and tanks,
since it was suffering from international sanctions and embargoes. However,Iran was not falling
behind on weapons so rapidly, as it was self-sufficient in the production of some smaller weapons
such as anti-tank TOW missiles, Scud Ballistic missiles (Shahab-1), Silkworm anti-ship missiles, Oghab
tactical rockets and producing spare parts and ammunition for their weaponry10
.
Other factors that influenced the course of the war in the mid-war period were the so-called tanker
war and the war of the cities. These parts of the war qualified as attritions and may have had the
greatest economic toll on the countries caused by the war. The start of the war of the cities was
officially noted in February 1984 when Iraq attacked 11 Iranian cities. This started a chain of
retaliations by both sides which targeted enemy border cities, oil installations and other economic
and strategic targets. Iraq used Tu-22s, Tu-16s, MiG25s, and Su-22 bombers for raids over Iranian
cities. Some Iraqi air raids used chemical weapons. The Iranians used F-4 and F-14 fighters to
intercept Iraqi bombers and retaliate on Iraqi cities. Iran also used Scud-B surface to surface missiles
to bomb Iraqi cities, including Bagdad11
. The tanker was a series of attacks on enemy and third party
oil tankers and oil terminals carried by the Iran and Iraq. Iraq used air power, MiG-23 fighters, but
mostly helicopters F-1 Mirages most equipped with exocet anti-ship missiles. Iran used its new
Revolutionary Guard’s navy with Boghammar speedboats fitted with rocket launchers, RPGs and
heavy machine guns; also warships with ship-to-ship missiles and land-based anti-ship missiles, and
further more helicopter and F-4s with Maverick missiles and unguided rockets; all in the series of
attacks on oil tankers and oil platforms12
. These wars of attrition caused a decrease in morale in the
army and public opinion about the war in both countries.
9
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 109)
10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War
11
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 124-127)
12
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 (p. 139-150)
4. To compensate for their shortage of heavy weapons, the Iranian leadership managed to recruit
650000 more volunteers in 1986. With these new soldiers, the Iranian army was able to have strong
new advancements, one in the battle of al-Faw and the other in the battle of Mehran. After this the
Iraqis together with the western powers became even more determined not to allow Iran to win the
war. This meant that Iraq installed helicopter behind every defense line equipped with chemical
weapons in the case of Iranian advancement; it recruited even more soldiers, totaling 1.5 million and
possessed 5550 tanks and 900 aircraft by the end of 1987. Iraq even further recruited foreign
military personnel where it found missing competent soldiers, such as pilots. The Iranian armament
when compared to the Iraqi strength was dwarfed. This gave Iraq the confidence to start the final
offensives of the war. These offensives were begun with the final ‘war of the cities’ in which Iraq
fired more than 200 missiles at 37 Iranian cities over 2 months; also threatening to use chemical
weapons in them. Iran was unable to effectively retaliate due to the deteriorated number of
functioning aircraft. After couple of decisive victories of the Iraqi army, Iran accepted the cease-fire.
Looking in retrospect, despite being the aggressor, Iraq was mostly on the defensive side of the war
until extensive foreign involvement came to save it from Iranian victory. If the war was stopped at
any moment before 1987 it could be expected that Iran would win the war since it had the military
personnel, equipment and tactics to do so; this was seen from the fast advancement of Iranian
troops during the first 2 years, and the slow but gradual advanced in the next 5 years of the war. In
that scenario, the difference in technology would have made a significant difference, since Iran was
using helicopters to transport troops to the front lines, small effective anti-tank weapons to counter
the Iraqi armor (which was greater in number than the Iranian armor) and the areal superiority
granted by the faster and longer ranged F-4s and F-5s compared to the Iraqis shorter ranged and
slower MiG-21s and MiGs-23. However, at the end of the war, the numbers of Iraqi armor, infantry
and aircraft became so significantly greater than the Iranian due to foreign aid that it did not
significantly matter what kind of technology the Iraqi had as long as it was comparable to
contemporary weaponry. As a conclusion, in the Iran-Iraq war, the difference in technology was not
a significant determining factor in its outcome of the war, since foreign involvement and the sheer
size of the Iraqi army was enough to determine the outcome of the war.
Word count: 2285
Bibliography
Rob Johnson – The Iran-Iraq War, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011