JANUARY 2014

The biggest
challenges are
demographics and
talking to different
generations

How membership
organisations can
make themselves
fit for purpose
online
white paper

The majority of
our members are
in senior positions
and heading into
retirement, we need
to engage younger
members
Contents
1. Executive summary
2. Membership organisations –
the social audit
3. Member communications
and the engagement rating
4. Achieving rich engagement
with the members
5. Conclusion
6. About Deeson Member
Communications

We have to take
a step back with
social media. Look at
what we are trying to
achieve strategically
and decide what we
engage with
1. Executive summary
Croissants, coffee and a breathtaking view were the
backdrop to our third knowledge share breakfast at the
Gherkin this month.
On 22 January, we gathered together high-profile
membership organisations and trade associations to take
part in a non-attributable conversation around membership
and online challenges.
Membership organisations strive to get close to their
members to demonstrate their value, so they can retain
existing members and attract new ones.
Do the plethora of free social media platforms offer an easy
and cost-effective way of doing this?
Getting close to a membership means building new and
meaningful relationships with them. But how effective is
social media in building these relationships?
Social media has raised everyone’s expectations about
online relationships – we all expect to be treated as
individuals and for our needs to be respected.
High street brands can do this in the context of one-off
purchases, so why not a membership organisation in
helping develop members’ professional careers over many
years?
In reality, membership associations are struggling to convert
conversations in social media spaces into truly deeper
relationships with their members.
Even if an organisation manages a closed group for its
members on a professional platform, such as LinkedIn, it’s
hard to consistently use these to add value, either from the
member’s point of view or the organisation’s.

The white paper contributors
Association of Colleges (AOC), British Medical Association
(BMA), College of Emergency Medicine (CEM), Engineering
Equipment & Materials Users’ Association (EEMUA),
Institute of Leadership & Management (ILM), Society of
Radiographers (SOR).

Member
engagement is
not digital at the
moment
2. Membership organisations –
the social audit
Platform popularity:
• All use Twitter, with some creating different
accounts to reach specific audiences
• Most use YouTube to host their videos, a third see
it as a communication channel in its own right
• Only one third makes significant use of LinkedIn
• Only one organisation uses Facebook
• Half have own communities online

We use
Twitter only as a
broadcasting tool

Twitter is used
for messaging, not
customer service
Owning the agenda
Most of these organisations use social media
primarily for messaging and brand management.
Less than half use these tools to support their
retention and acquisition needs or to foster
networking and debate. The deeper engagement is
occurring on the owned communities.
Why should it be so hard to make social media
activity pay for itself in a member organisation?
In most organisations it’s the marketing department
that owns the social media agenda, possibly
supported by an external digital agency. But should
this activity just sit within the marketing team?
Marketing is essentially there to communicate the
value of a product or service to customers and
social media provides a great route for innovative
campaigns and getting the message out to the
audience.
What the membership needs on social media is
a responsive service which involves the whole
membership organisation, with a focus on customer
service.
They need support from the policy, training, events,
communications and member services teams.

Case studies
The Institute of Leadership & Management has
a proactive LinkedIn group which is memberonly, a closed tutor group, and an open group for
prospecting.
For the Society of Radiographers, Twitter and
YouTube are the strongest platforms. YouTube links
to their major events, such as conferences and
protest marches.
The British Medical Association is reviewing its
internal processes and structure, having recently
launched its owned community. Within the
Communications Directorate a simple name change
now sees the news team sitting in the ‘member
engagement’ department alongside the social media
team, which also runs the BMA’s owned community.

We use
LinkedIn for
broadcasting

Our whole ethos
was towards
broadcast but now
that is changing

Twitter has
become the
main way of
campaigning
3. Member communications and
the engagement rating
Trade associations and professional bodies have varied
audiences. These include members of the public attracted
by campaigns, curious students needing support and
qualified professionals in niche specialisms.
Effective engagement with these audiences needs a
clear understanding of their motivations. Questions need
considering to fully understand these audiences and profile
their needs.
Why would they want to be involved with a membership
organisation? How do these reasons match the
organisation’s current and future objectives?
Many organisations consider their engagement much
higher than it is in reality. We asked each organisation to
examine their overall audience engagement online and rate
their current external communication. They were also asked
to peg where they want communications to be in the next
three years.

We intend
to use polls,
surveys and
commenting to
solicit feedback
from our
members

The engagement scale
The four stages of engagement that were explored:
• Stage 1 – No engagement The organisation is purely
broadcasting – they don’t know who’s reading the
message and even if they are reading
• Stage 2 – One-way communication The organisation is
communicating to a first tier. These will be ‘gatekeepers’
for trade associations and member email lists for
professional bodies
• Stage 3 – Light two-way communication The
organisation uses social media to broadcast and respond
to members, prospects and other parties, such as the
media, key opinion leaders and the public. There is lowlevel interaction (comments, likes, subscribes, shares,
retweets, @mentions and posts) and only occasional
value is identified
• Stage 4 – Deep two-way communication The
organisation is proactively engaging with members,
prospects and other audiences. This is through its
own on-domain community, as well as social spaces.
A community manager is managing comments and
demonstrating value back to the organisation

The problem for us is
we reach a learned view
on a situation or policy
and a discussion in real
time might not represent
that informed view
Our membership is
so broad, we need to
use communities for
very specific groups,
such as groups of
learners
The engagement results for 2014
Our poll revealed that current external communications by
organisations is achieving a low level of engagement among
members:
• 50% are achieving one-way communication
• 50% are achieving shallow two-way communication
• None think they have achieved deep two-way
communication
Considering most professional member organisations
have yet to fully integrate online and social networking and
community into their businesses, this is not an unexpected
response.

The engagement projection for 2017
Move forward three years and these organisations want to
be at a different stage:
• 20% are looking to move from stage 2’s one-way
communication to stage 3’s light two-way communication
• 80% are looking to move to stage 4’s deep two-way
communication.
This ambition to jump ahead in engagement within three
years demonstrates the challenges ahead. Here were some
key points raised:
• Some websites are not fit for purpose from a user
experience, let alone becoming useful transactional hubs
for members to interact with membership organisations
and with other members
• Membership organisations need to think more strategically
and use technology to work towards their organisation’s
business goals
• Content needs to be more interesting, relevant and
shareable. In particular, all organisations recognised the
importance of developing their presence on video sharing
platforms
• Organisations are experimenting with new ways to ask for
membership feedback, such as polls and questions on
social media
• Member contributions to debate or website/magazine
content needs to have prominence and not be regarded
as second-rate
• Not all debate can be public and that’s where an owned
community is far more valuable than social media
platforms

There’s a case
for pushing out
and not expecting
a response
4. Achieving rich engagement with the
members
Achieving deep two-way communications with members requires
initiatives for interaction, relationship-building and collaboration
with the multiple teams of officers and committees that make up a
membership organisation’s head office.
Such initiatives are far better handled on an ‘owned community’
platform than an external social media one. Such platforms allow
officers across the business to help make the organisation a vital
part of their members’ day-to-day working lives.
To stimulate discussion, the table below was used to illustrate the
main activities of any membership association, who is responsible
for them, and the ideal platform on which they can be developed.

Ideal platform
Owned
Your objectives
community

Activity

Department

Social
media

Reputation management with
public

Marketing

Y

Reputation
management

Public relations

PR, Marketing

Y

Brand awareness

Brand extension

Marketing

Y

Brand awareness

Real-time news for public

Press, comms

Y

Brand awareness

Thought leadership with public Comms

Y

[Y]

Brand awareness

Promotion of products

Marketing

Y

[Y]

Prospecting

Engagement with prospects

Business
development,
Sales

Y

[Y]

Prospecting

Peer-to-peer self-help and
discussion

Comms

[Y]

Y

Efficiency gains

Member self-help

Members

Y

Efficiency gains

Identity confirmation through
link with CRM

IT

Y

Efficiency gains

Product innovation

Business
development

Y

New business
opportunities

Reviews of products and
services

Events,
publications,
training etc

Y

New business
opportunities

Premium (paid) services
including tailored content
associated with suppliers

Business
development

Y

New business
opportunities

Real-time news for members

Press, comms

Y

Improved internal
communications

Thought-leadership with
members

Comms, policy,
governance

Y

Improved internal
communications

Knowledge exchange and
professional development

Policy, training

Y

Improved internal
communications

Y

Collaboration
between members &
officers

Y

Collaboration
between members &
officers

Member-to-member
networking
Committees, SIGs, local
groups etc

[Y]

[Y]

[Y]

Member services,
regional services
Case studies
The Institute of Leadership & Management has a one-sizefits-all membership offering, leaving it up to members to
find what they want. To address this a new communication
strategy will see the use of social to position the organisation
as the hub for member activity and networking, using the
organisation’s site as a conduit to social media platforms to
help segment the audience.
The College of Emergency Medicine is considering not having
a comms team as everyone thinks engagement is just a
comms’ team job – in other words encouraging silo working
and doing things that are not relevant. The College is thinking
of embedding communications within the whole organisation.

We need the right
tools and then interact
on the basic stuff before
moving into a much richer
engagement picture, which
will take a few years
Our experience is
there is not always the
time to communicate
very deep two-way

In some parts of the
organisation members
are seen as an
inconvenience
5. Conclusion
To move forward, we found that:
• Social media is just one tool in the membership engagement toolbox and it needs to work in conjunction with the
organisation’s overall strategy
• There needs to be a better appreciation from the top down about just how social media and an owned
community in particular, can further the objectives of the organisation
• Making the business case for investing in social media and owned communities includes delivering a coherent
communications strategy
• Relying on inertia to keep the membership fees flowing is not sustainable in a social media age that takes
networking and sharing as a given
• Internal siloed-working is not compatible with external deep two-way communication.
Points to consider:
• Social communication means moving beyond broadcast and allowing genuine two-way exchanges between
people at every level in the organisation
• A fragmented approach within the organisation to external communication will not ultimately satisfy the individual
member. Fragmentation is frustrating both for the officer and the member
• Social tools can address fragmentation. They not only allow management to communicate what they are
planning to do and why they are planning to do it; crucially they also invite the rest of the staff to explore,
together, how they understand these plans will be worked out across the organisation
• Social knowledge, the business-critical knowledge that resides in our brains and memories, requires social forms
of communication to surface it
Over the next few weeks, we will be writing a series of blogs to cover some of the points in the conclusion and
to suggest ways forward. Follow us on Twitter @DeesonMC for updates or keep an eye on our blog deeson-mc.
co.uk/blog
6. About Deeson Member
Communications
Deeson Member Communications is an integrated
digital, communications and publishing agency for
member organisations.
We devise and deliver social media, websites,
publishing, content, marketing and strategy for our
clients. Our solutions engage, inform, retain and
attract members.
Clients include: College of Emergency Medicine,
Political Studies Association, Royal Meteorological
Society, Institute of Economic Affairs and Society
and the Society and College of Radiographers.

Join us at our Gherkin events
The Gherkin breakfast briefing is a quarterly event
to discuss the key issues facing membership
organisations.
The next event is in April 2014. To join the waiting
list, contact emilyt@deeson.co.uk.
These events are attended by senior
representatives, up to CEO level, from high profile
membership organisations and trade associations.
Places are available on a first-come, first-served
basis.

Contact
If anything in this white paper has resonated with
you and your organisation, our team would be
happy to help. Please contact:
Geoff White, Business Development Manager
geoffw@deeson.co.uk

Follow us
The web: deeson-mc.co.uk/blog
Twitter: @DeesonMC #DMCwhitepaper
LinkedIn (search for Deeson Group Ltd)
© COPYRIGHT DEESON GROUP LTD 2014
How can membership organisations be fit for purpose online - white paper

How can membership organisations be fit for purpose online - white paper

  • 1.
    JANUARY 2014 The biggest challengesare demographics and talking to different generations How membership organisations can make themselves fit for purpose online white paper The majority of our members are in senior positions and heading into retirement, we need to engage younger members
  • 2.
    Contents 1. Executive summary 2.Membership organisations – the social audit 3. Member communications and the engagement rating 4. Achieving rich engagement with the members 5. Conclusion 6. About Deeson Member Communications We have to take a step back with social media. Look at what we are trying to achieve strategically and decide what we engage with
  • 3.
    1. Executive summary Croissants,coffee and a breathtaking view were the backdrop to our third knowledge share breakfast at the Gherkin this month. On 22 January, we gathered together high-profile membership organisations and trade associations to take part in a non-attributable conversation around membership and online challenges. Membership organisations strive to get close to their members to demonstrate their value, so they can retain existing members and attract new ones. Do the plethora of free social media platforms offer an easy and cost-effective way of doing this? Getting close to a membership means building new and meaningful relationships with them. But how effective is social media in building these relationships? Social media has raised everyone’s expectations about online relationships – we all expect to be treated as individuals and for our needs to be respected. High street brands can do this in the context of one-off purchases, so why not a membership organisation in helping develop members’ professional careers over many years? In reality, membership associations are struggling to convert conversations in social media spaces into truly deeper relationships with their members. Even if an organisation manages a closed group for its members on a professional platform, such as LinkedIn, it’s hard to consistently use these to add value, either from the member’s point of view or the organisation’s. The white paper contributors Association of Colleges (AOC), British Medical Association (BMA), College of Emergency Medicine (CEM), Engineering Equipment & Materials Users’ Association (EEMUA), Institute of Leadership & Management (ILM), Society of Radiographers (SOR). Member engagement is not digital at the moment
  • 4.
    2. Membership organisations– the social audit Platform popularity: • All use Twitter, with some creating different accounts to reach specific audiences • Most use YouTube to host their videos, a third see it as a communication channel in its own right • Only one third makes significant use of LinkedIn • Only one organisation uses Facebook • Half have own communities online We use Twitter only as a broadcasting tool Twitter is used for messaging, not customer service
  • 5.
    Owning the agenda Mostof these organisations use social media primarily for messaging and brand management. Less than half use these tools to support their retention and acquisition needs or to foster networking and debate. The deeper engagement is occurring on the owned communities. Why should it be so hard to make social media activity pay for itself in a member organisation? In most organisations it’s the marketing department that owns the social media agenda, possibly supported by an external digital agency. But should this activity just sit within the marketing team? Marketing is essentially there to communicate the value of a product or service to customers and social media provides a great route for innovative campaigns and getting the message out to the audience. What the membership needs on social media is a responsive service which involves the whole membership organisation, with a focus on customer service. They need support from the policy, training, events, communications and member services teams. Case studies The Institute of Leadership & Management has a proactive LinkedIn group which is memberonly, a closed tutor group, and an open group for prospecting. For the Society of Radiographers, Twitter and YouTube are the strongest platforms. YouTube links to their major events, such as conferences and protest marches. The British Medical Association is reviewing its internal processes and structure, having recently launched its owned community. Within the Communications Directorate a simple name change now sees the news team sitting in the ‘member engagement’ department alongside the social media team, which also runs the BMA’s owned community. We use LinkedIn for broadcasting Our whole ethos was towards broadcast but now that is changing Twitter has become the main way of campaigning
  • 6.
    3. Member communicationsand the engagement rating Trade associations and professional bodies have varied audiences. These include members of the public attracted by campaigns, curious students needing support and qualified professionals in niche specialisms. Effective engagement with these audiences needs a clear understanding of their motivations. Questions need considering to fully understand these audiences and profile their needs. Why would they want to be involved with a membership organisation? How do these reasons match the organisation’s current and future objectives? Many organisations consider their engagement much higher than it is in reality. We asked each organisation to examine their overall audience engagement online and rate their current external communication. They were also asked to peg where they want communications to be in the next three years. We intend to use polls, surveys and commenting to solicit feedback from our members The engagement scale The four stages of engagement that were explored: • Stage 1 – No engagement The organisation is purely broadcasting – they don’t know who’s reading the message and even if they are reading • Stage 2 – One-way communication The organisation is communicating to a first tier. These will be ‘gatekeepers’ for trade associations and member email lists for professional bodies • Stage 3 – Light two-way communication The organisation uses social media to broadcast and respond to members, prospects and other parties, such as the media, key opinion leaders and the public. There is lowlevel interaction (comments, likes, subscribes, shares, retweets, @mentions and posts) and only occasional value is identified • Stage 4 – Deep two-way communication The organisation is proactively engaging with members, prospects and other audiences. This is through its own on-domain community, as well as social spaces. A community manager is managing comments and demonstrating value back to the organisation The problem for us is we reach a learned view on a situation or policy and a discussion in real time might not represent that informed view
  • 7.
    Our membership is sobroad, we need to use communities for very specific groups, such as groups of learners The engagement results for 2014 Our poll revealed that current external communications by organisations is achieving a low level of engagement among members: • 50% are achieving one-way communication • 50% are achieving shallow two-way communication • None think they have achieved deep two-way communication Considering most professional member organisations have yet to fully integrate online and social networking and community into their businesses, this is not an unexpected response. The engagement projection for 2017 Move forward three years and these organisations want to be at a different stage: • 20% are looking to move from stage 2’s one-way communication to stage 3’s light two-way communication • 80% are looking to move to stage 4’s deep two-way communication. This ambition to jump ahead in engagement within three years demonstrates the challenges ahead. Here were some key points raised: • Some websites are not fit for purpose from a user experience, let alone becoming useful transactional hubs for members to interact with membership organisations and with other members • Membership organisations need to think more strategically and use technology to work towards their organisation’s business goals • Content needs to be more interesting, relevant and shareable. In particular, all organisations recognised the importance of developing their presence on video sharing platforms • Organisations are experimenting with new ways to ask for membership feedback, such as polls and questions on social media • Member contributions to debate or website/magazine content needs to have prominence and not be regarded as second-rate • Not all debate can be public and that’s where an owned community is far more valuable than social media platforms There’s a case for pushing out and not expecting a response
  • 8.
    4. Achieving richengagement with the members Achieving deep two-way communications with members requires initiatives for interaction, relationship-building and collaboration with the multiple teams of officers and committees that make up a membership organisation’s head office. Such initiatives are far better handled on an ‘owned community’ platform than an external social media one. Such platforms allow officers across the business to help make the organisation a vital part of their members’ day-to-day working lives. To stimulate discussion, the table below was used to illustrate the main activities of any membership association, who is responsible for them, and the ideal platform on which they can be developed. Ideal platform Owned Your objectives community Activity Department Social media Reputation management with public Marketing Y Reputation management Public relations PR, Marketing Y Brand awareness Brand extension Marketing Y Brand awareness Real-time news for public Press, comms Y Brand awareness Thought leadership with public Comms Y [Y] Brand awareness Promotion of products Marketing Y [Y] Prospecting Engagement with prospects Business development, Sales Y [Y] Prospecting Peer-to-peer self-help and discussion Comms [Y] Y Efficiency gains Member self-help Members Y Efficiency gains Identity confirmation through link with CRM IT Y Efficiency gains Product innovation Business development Y New business opportunities Reviews of products and services Events, publications, training etc Y New business opportunities Premium (paid) services including tailored content associated with suppliers Business development Y New business opportunities Real-time news for members Press, comms Y Improved internal communications Thought-leadership with members Comms, policy, governance Y Improved internal communications Knowledge exchange and professional development Policy, training Y Improved internal communications Y Collaboration between members & officers Y Collaboration between members & officers Member-to-member networking Committees, SIGs, local groups etc [Y] [Y] [Y] Member services, regional services
  • 9.
    Case studies The Instituteof Leadership & Management has a one-sizefits-all membership offering, leaving it up to members to find what they want. To address this a new communication strategy will see the use of social to position the organisation as the hub for member activity and networking, using the organisation’s site as a conduit to social media platforms to help segment the audience. The College of Emergency Medicine is considering not having a comms team as everyone thinks engagement is just a comms’ team job – in other words encouraging silo working and doing things that are not relevant. The College is thinking of embedding communications within the whole organisation. We need the right tools and then interact on the basic stuff before moving into a much richer engagement picture, which will take a few years
  • 10.
    Our experience is thereis not always the time to communicate very deep two-way In some parts of the organisation members are seen as an inconvenience 5. Conclusion To move forward, we found that: • Social media is just one tool in the membership engagement toolbox and it needs to work in conjunction with the organisation’s overall strategy • There needs to be a better appreciation from the top down about just how social media and an owned community in particular, can further the objectives of the organisation • Making the business case for investing in social media and owned communities includes delivering a coherent communications strategy • Relying on inertia to keep the membership fees flowing is not sustainable in a social media age that takes networking and sharing as a given • Internal siloed-working is not compatible with external deep two-way communication. Points to consider: • Social communication means moving beyond broadcast and allowing genuine two-way exchanges between people at every level in the organisation • A fragmented approach within the organisation to external communication will not ultimately satisfy the individual member. Fragmentation is frustrating both for the officer and the member • Social tools can address fragmentation. They not only allow management to communicate what they are planning to do and why they are planning to do it; crucially they also invite the rest of the staff to explore, together, how they understand these plans will be worked out across the organisation • Social knowledge, the business-critical knowledge that resides in our brains and memories, requires social forms of communication to surface it Over the next few weeks, we will be writing a series of blogs to cover some of the points in the conclusion and to suggest ways forward. Follow us on Twitter @DeesonMC for updates or keep an eye on our blog deeson-mc. co.uk/blog
  • 11.
    6. About DeesonMember Communications Deeson Member Communications is an integrated digital, communications and publishing agency for member organisations. We devise and deliver social media, websites, publishing, content, marketing and strategy for our clients. Our solutions engage, inform, retain and attract members. Clients include: College of Emergency Medicine, Political Studies Association, Royal Meteorological Society, Institute of Economic Affairs and Society and the Society and College of Radiographers. Join us at our Gherkin events The Gherkin breakfast briefing is a quarterly event to discuss the key issues facing membership organisations. The next event is in April 2014. To join the waiting list, contact emilyt@deeson.co.uk. These events are attended by senior representatives, up to CEO level, from high profile membership organisations and trade associations. Places are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Contact If anything in this white paper has resonated with you and your organisation, our team would be happy to help. Please contact: Geoff White, Business Development Manager geoffw@deeson.co.uk Follow us The web: deeson-mc.co.uk/blog Twitter: @DeesonMC #DMCwhitepaper LinkedIn (search for Deeson Group Ltd) © COPYRIGHT DEESON GROUP LTD 2014