Presentation on HIV-associated sensory neuropathy that was delivered at the XXII World Congress of Neurology, Santiago, Chile, 2015, in a session on the management of difficult neuropathic pain conditions.
2. Disclosures
I have no actual or potential conflicts of interest related to the material
being presented.
Nor do I discuss off-label indications for any medications.
5. Australia: Smyth et al., 2007; Malawi: Beadles et al., 2009; van Oosterhout et al., 2005;
South Africa: Maritz et al., 2010; Wadley et al., 2011; SE Asia: Affandi et al., 2008;
Wright et al., 2008 ; Uganda: Nakasujja et al., 2005; USA: Simpson et al., 2006; Ellis et al., 2010
Global prevalence: 30-60%
Prevalence
6. For review: Kamerman et al., 2012a, 2012b
Dorsal root ganglion Axon and peripheral terminalSpinal cord
Pathogenesis
8. HIV-SN is down, but not out
Newer, less toxic treatments
Ellis et al., 2010; Kamerman, 2015
9. Hung et al., 2005
HIV-SN is down, but not out
Newer, less toxic treatments
Neurotoxic drug regimen Other drug regimens
Proportionwith
worseningsigns
Proportionwith
worseningsymptoms
10. • HIV-SN is common
• Expected to remain a problem
Summary
12. Painful HIV-SN
Pain is a common feature
Veves et al., 2007; Sadosky et al., 2008; Haanpaa et al., 2009;
van Hecke et al., 2014
13. Common causes of chronic pain in HIV
Painful peripheral neuropathy 45-48%
Low back pain 22-28%
Arthralgia 6-13%
Koeppe et al., 2010
Major cause of chronic pain in HIV
Painful HIV-SN
14. Ellis et al., 2010; Hung et al., 2008; Malvar et al., 2015;
Pillay et al., 2015
Risk of pain
↑ risk
Previous neurotoxic drug use
Past or current cART
↑ nadir CD4 T-cell count
Current major depressive disorder
Number of other pain sites
↑ age
Female sex
↓ risk
Current neurotoxic drug use
↑ time since HIV diagnosis
Risk factors for having pain
Painful HIV-SN
15. Keltner et al., 2014
Proportionwithpainful
HIV-SN
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.5
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quartiles of adjusted log cortical volume loss
Pain is associated with reduced cortical volumes
Painful HIV-SN
16. Pain intensity
↑ intensity
↑ viral load
↓ intra-epidermal nerve fibre density
↑ pain catastrophizing
↑ depressive symptoms
↑ number of pain sites
Genetic polymorphisms in KCNS1/TNFA/MHCIII
Simpson et al., 2002; Polydefkis et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2007; Lucey et al.,
2011; Hendry et al., 2013; Hendry et al., 2015; Pillay et al., 2015
The pain typically is moderate-to-severe
Painful HIV-SN
17. Having painful HIV-SN is associated with
Being unemployed
↑ depression and anxiety
↑ severity of depressive symptoms
↑ sleep disturbance
↓ independence
↓ social functioning
Ellis et al., 2010; Phillips et al., 2014
Impact of the pain
Painful HIV-SN
18. • Pain is common
• Typically is moderate-to-severe
• Causes a significant decrease in QoL
Summary
20. Can we treat the pain?
Phillips et al., 2010; Clifford et al., 2012*
Treatment Pain relief superior to
placebo
Yes No
Topical lidocaine gel (5%)
Capsaicin patch (8%) ?*
Amitriptyline
Lamotrigine
Mexilitine
Gabapentin / Pregabalin
21. Can we treat the pain?
Finnerup et al., 2015
“Pain due to HIV-related painful polyneuropathy…seems
more refractory [to treatment] than other types of pain in our
meta-analysis.”
“This difference might be due to large placebo responses in
HIV-related neuropathy trials”
22. Confounding by the placebo response
Cepeda et al., 2012
HIV-SN trials show larger placebo response
23. Confounded by the placebo response
...and more placebo responders
Cepeda et al., 2012
25. Failed drug or failed study?
Tuttle et al., doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000333
Increasing placebo response is a general phenomenon
26. Failed drug or failed study?
Simpson et al., 2014
“Methodological refinements...to minimize the potential
placebo response, which was quite large in the previous
study”
27. Failed drug or failed study?
“Methodological refinements...to minimize the potential
placebo response, which was quite large in the previous
study”
● High baseline pain scores
● Low baseline pain variability
● Long baseline period + single-blind placebo lead-in
● Restricted use of concomitant medications for pain
● Improved phenotyping
Simpson et al., 2014
29. Failed drug or failed study?
“Methodological refinements...to minimize the potential
placebo response, which was quite large in the previous
study”
● High baseline pain scores
● Low baseline pain variability
● Long baseline period + single-blind placebo lead-in
● Restricted use of concomitant medications for pain
● Improved phenotyping
Simpson et al., 2014
31. “HIV-associated DSP was confirmed by the clinician at
screening, ensuring that the patient had at least two of the
three following neurological signs...reduced superficial
sensation in the distal lower extremities bilaterally (using the
pin-prick test)”
Simpson et al., 2014
Failed drug or failed study?
32. Summary
• HIV-SN is common
• Is expected to remain a problem
• Pain is common
• Typically is moderate-to-severe
• Causes a significant decrease in QoL
• The evidence-base to guide treatment is poor
33. University of the Witwatersrand
Antonia Wadley
Zané Lombard
Prinisha Pillay
Liesl Hendry
Burnet Institute, Melbourne
Kate Cherry
University of Western Australia, Perth
Patricia Price
Hayley Goullée
Constance Chew
Funding
• National Research
Foundation, South Africa
• South African Medical
Research Council
• International Association for
the Study of Pain
• University of the
Witwatersrand
Acknowledgements