Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a r.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a reverence page if that works for you. Imagine that you have been sent to the newly discovered planet of Utaboopia that is inhabited by a population of humans. After learning how to communicate with them you find that they do not have any type of taboo language within their culture. Write a scientific article for the Utaboopians explaining what taboo language is, how it functions, and why it exists in Earth culture. Hypothesize about why Utaboopians lack taboo language and what it means for their culture; propose future research to test your hypothesis. Exam Rubric Exam Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts Identifies & Explains Issues view longer description Clearly identifies main problem and successfully explains it for intended audience 3.0 pts Identifies main problem and attempts to explain it 2.0 pts Identifies main problem but does not explain it sufficiently 1.0 pts Does not identify main problem 0.0 pts 3.0 pts Proposes Credible Solution view longer description Offers a credible solution and persuasively argues for it 5.0 pts Offers a plausible solution and attempts to argue for it 4.0 pts Offers a plausible solution 3.0 pts Offers a partial solution (i.e. only addresses part of the prompt) 2.0 pts Offers a vague or implausible solution 1.0 pts Does not offer a solution 0.0 pts 5.0 pts Applying Terminology Correctly uses all appropriate terminology introduced in class so far 4.0 pts Correctly uses some appropriate terminology introduced in class so far 3.0 pts Uses terminology introduced in class so far, but makes some mistakes in usage 2.0 pts Insufficiently uses terminology introduced in class so far or misuses terminology from class 1.0 pts Does not use terminology introduced in class so far 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Explaining Terminology view longer description Clearly explains all appropriate terminology for intended audience. 4.0 pts Attempts to explain all appropriate terminology. 3.0 pts Attempts to explain some appropriate terminology 2.0 pts Incorrectly explains terminology 1.0 pts Neglects to use and/or to explain appropriate terminology 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Applying Concepts, Theories, and Approaches Applies all relevant concepts, theories, and approaches discussed so far in course materials 4.0 pts Applies some relevant concepts, theories, or approaches discussed so far in course materials 3.0 pts Applies concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials but makes some mistakes in application 2.0 pts Insufficiently applies or misuses concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials 1.0 pts Does not apply concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Examples view longer description Offers plentiful illustrative examples both novel and from course materials or other sources 4.0 pts Offers illustrative examples, mostly from course materials 3.0 pts Offers some illustrative examples 2.0 p.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Choose a TOTAL of two questions to write about, but please choos.docx
Choose a TOTAL of two questions to write about, but please choose different plays for each question. You may use books, notes, Power Points, dictionaries, translators, etc. Just please do not use the internet to find your answers. Length of essays will vary, but be sure to use specific examples to make the point you are making and include an opening and closing paragraph (4 or 5 paragraphs for each essay should suffice.)
How does the poem by Langston Hughes, from which the play A Raisin in the Sun takes its name, relate to the themes in the play?
What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.
Or does it explode?
What sort of statement does Lorraine Hansberry (the author) seem to be making about race? Does she make more than one statement? If so, do these statements conflict with each other?
Of the major characters in A Raisin in the Sun (Beneatha, Walter Lee, Mama, Ruth), choose one which you would consider to be a protagonist and which to be an antagonist and explain why.
The Glass Menagerie
Of the main characters (Tom, Laura, or Amanda), which face life most unrealistically? Does this contribute to the themes of illusion versus reality featured in the play?
Discuss the symbol of the glass menagerie. What does it represent? Does it represent the same things throughout the play, or does its meaning change?
Triffles
What life was like for Minnie Wright when John Wright was alive? How do the props in the play come to represent their life together, and the motive for his murder?
How might the circumstances of the character Minnie Wright compare to Mrs. Mallard from The Story of an Hour or the narrator from The Yellow Wallpaper?
Formal Essay ENG 102
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Claim/Focus
Claim and Focus:
Take an arguable stance on the issue and develop the essay around that stance.
50.0 pts
Advanced
The essay introduces an interesting, clear, arguable, and precise claim, based on the topic or text(s) and establishes the significance of the claim. The essay maintains strong focus on the purpose and task, using the whole essay to support and develop the claim and counterclaims fairly while thoroughly addressing demands of the prompt.
40.0 pts
Proficient
The essay introduces a clear, arguable, and specific claim, based on the topic or text(s). The essay maintains focus on the purpose and task, using most of the essay to support and develop the claim and counterclaims while thoroughly addressing the demands of the prompt.
30.0 pts
Developing
The essay introduces a clear, arguable, and specific claim, based on the topic or text(s), but it may somewhat unclear or not maintained throughout the essay. The essay may not fully address the demands of the prompt or stay focused on the purpose and task. The writing may ...
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101
e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity
The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay.
Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132)
In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original.
You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor.
Preliminary Steps
1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose.
2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues.
3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately.
A Possible Outline for Your Essay
Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s:
• Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet.
• Introduce & briefly summarize the main article:
· Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.)
· Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here.
• Respond:
· You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet.
· Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on.
· Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question.
· In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article).
· If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points.
· This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs.
• Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way.
Think it through!
Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response.
In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Analyzes the
Material
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
clearly and completely
addressed in light of
applicable page
limits/presentation
length limits (5–7
pages or 10–12
minutes of
student-spoken audio).
Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly
and reach the nuances
of the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with
precision, clarity and
detail.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Major elements of
the assigned topic
are discussed in a
meaningful way
but the
paper/presentation
would benefit from
additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are
generally well
constructed.
Complex issues
are recognized.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are
mentioned but the
discussion is incomplete,
unclear, superficial, too
general or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
Assigned
elements are not
discussed.
35 pts
Content
Organization
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
The
paper/presentation is
focused and well
organized. The
paper/presentation
has a clear thesis, and
a clear and
substantive
introduction and
conclusion. The
paper/presentation
effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus
and deepen analyses.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
The
paper/presentation
is reasonably well
organized and
follows a logical
path from idea to
idea and section to
section. The
paper/presentation
includes an
adequate
introduction and
conclusion.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The paper/presentation is
in need of additional
organization and clarity.
Ideas and/or sections of
the paper/presentation
either do not flow logically
or are in need of
fundamental improvement.
The paper is lacking an
adequate introduction
and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
The
paper/presentation
lacks meaningful
organization and
the paper lacks
and introduction
and conclusion.
35 pts
Research Paper or Presentation: Final Grading Rubric |
PSCI600_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Evaluation,
Synthesis
and
Adequate
use of
Sources
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts and
ideas are evaluated
critically and
synthesized in a
manner that moves
beyond restatement
and makes a valuable
contribution to the
assigned topic.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and
support the
paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and
ideas are
understood and
linked in a
reasonable way
that supports the
paper’s
conclusions.
Paper reflects a
good familiarity
with the major
ideas but would
benefit from
greater critical
evaluation and
syntheses.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used
but not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an
effective manner.
Paper/presentation would
benefit from more
substantive use of sources,
more appropriate reliance
on sources, and/or better
skill in evaluating,
sy ...
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docx
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docx
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
Assignment InstructionsAssignment 1 SocializationDue by
Assignment Instructions
Assignment 1: Socialization
Due by 11:55p on Sunday of Week 3
Assignment 1 meets the following course objectives:
Apply a sociological perspective to the social world.
Analyze contemporary social issues using the sociological imagination and use sociological theories and concepts to analyze everyday life.
Demonstrate the ability to identify, locate, and retrieve information related to the topics in the course.
Describe culture and socialization
Purpose
The primary goal of this exercise is to apply your developing sociological knowledge and skills to the analysis of the process of socialization.
Writing Expectations
This should be 4-6 pages long, double-spaced, 11pt font (arial or times new roman), with 1" margins.
Instructions:
Describe and analyze the process of socialization.
Begin with responding to the question “Who Am I?” In your description, make sure to incorporate the concepts we have addressed in the course, such as roles, statuses, group membership, etc. Your response to this question should be at least 1+ page in length. Next,
analyze
at least
4 agents of socialization
that have affected your development as an individual, focusing on childhood socialization into adulthood. Consider, for example, the ways in which the family, religion, media, peers, and education have influenced your development, opportunities, and life choices. Your analysis of the process of socialization should be 3+ pages in length and incorporate
at least 4 sociological concepts or theories
covered in this course (hint: sociological concepts should be clearly identified and then applied; any paraphrasing or direct quotes used from another source should include APA formatted in-text citations and a full citation at the end of the essay. Examples of related concepts and theories include the self, moral development, nature and nurture, and resocialization).
Grading Rubric
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Who am I description
5 points
Exemplary
Detailed description of individual’s identity, roles, statuses as applicable
5 points
Accomplished
Discussed roles and statuses, including the setting and preparation as applicable
4.3 points
Developing
Discussed roles and statuses, some details lacking
3.8 points
Beginning
Briefly described roles and statuses, details lacking
3.3 points
Did not attempt
No discussion of roles and statuses or description lacks detail
0 points
Analysis of socialization
10 points
Exemplary
Clearly analyzed socialization process, identifying and describing 4+ influential agents of socialization
10 points
Accomplished
Discussed the socialization process, identifies and describes 4 influential agents of socialization
8.5 points
Developing
Discussed the socialization process; some detail lacking.
7.5 points
Beginning
Discussed meaning of the events; did not include cultural, symbolic, structural, or social meaning
6.5 points
Did ...
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Argument Position Essay Rubric
Content
15
10
5
1
90 total
Introduction
Well-developed introduction that engages readers and creates interest. Identifies a compelling, controversial issue/topic
Contains detailed background information on said topic.
Introduction creates interest.
Identifies a controversial issue/topic
Provides some background information.
Needs minor work.
Introduction is adequate, but does not catch the reader’s attention and/or does not clearly set up the purpose of the paper. Needs moderate work.
.
Introduction is inadequate and/or needs major work. Writer does not attempt to create interest. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related. Introduction is missing.
Thesis Statement
Clear thesis statement that identifies the main reasons that will support the position and direct the reader toward the point of the paper.
Thesis statement is arguable and the writer takes a clear stance.
Clear thesis statement is present, but may be lacking one reason or could be more engaging and/or direct.
Thesis statement is arguable
Thesis is vague and unclear. It requires effort on the part of the reader to discern the point of the paper and the reasons supporting your position.
Thesis is not arguable
Stance is unclear and vague
No thesis present, or thesis is so inadequate that the point of the paper is completely unclear.
Body Paragraphs
Body paragraphs include a topic sentence that connects to thesis and states the main focus of paragraph
Well-developed/relevant examples, details, and evidence.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content.
It is clear and focused, demonstrates original thought/reflection/insight. It holds the reader’s attention.
The paper effectively covers the topic.
Body paragraphs support thesis with examples, details, and evidence
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and adequately explain the content.
It is reasonably clear and focused, and the writer goes beyond the superficial or obvious. It holds the reader’s attention. On the whole, accurate details or clear thoughts are present to support the main idea (reasons).
. It effectively covers the topic.
Topic Sentences are vague and unclear
Body paragraphs offer adequate support to thesis, but examples, details, and support do not go far enough.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are present, but does not enhance and/or explain the content or demonstrate thought/reflection/analysis or specifics.
Lacks full development of ideas.
No topic sentences present
Inadequate number of major points/reasons. Body paragraphs inadequately support the thesis, and examples, details, and quotes are significantly underdeveloped.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are weak, inadequate, or missing.
. It shows no clear sense of purpose and does not reveal reflection. The text reads like a collection of ...
Recommended
Choose a TOTAL of two questions to write about, but please choos.docx
Choose a TOTAL of two questions to write about, but please choose different plays for each question. You may use books, notes, Power Points, dictionaries, translators, etc. Just please do not use the internet to find your answers. Length of essays will vary, but be sure to use specific examples to make the point you are making and include an opening and closing paragraph (4 or 5 paragraphs for each essay should suffice.)
How does the poem by Langston Hughes, from which the play A Raisin in the Sun takes its name, relate to the themes in the play?
What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.
Or does it explode?
What sort of statement does Lorraine Hansberry (the author) seem to be making about race? Does she make more than one statement? If so, do these statements conflict with each other?
Of the major characters in A Raisin in the Sun (Beneatha, Walter Lee, Mama, Ruth), choose one which you would consider to be a protagonist and which to be an antagonist and explain why.
The Glass Menagerie
Of the main characters (Tom, Laura, or Amanda), which face life most unrealistically? Does this contribute to the themes of illusion versus reality featured in the play?
Discuss the symbol of the glass menagerie. What does it represent? Does it represent the same things throughout the play, or does its meaning change?
Triffles
What life was like for Minnie Wright when John Wright was alive? How do the props in the play come to represent their life together, and the motive for his murder?
How might the circumstances of the character Minnie Wright compare to Mrs. Mallard from The Story of an Hour or the narrator from The Yellow Wallpaper?
Formal Essay ENG 102
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Claim/Focus
Claim and Focus:
Take an arguable stance on the issue and develop the essay around that stance.
50.0 pts
Advanced
The essay introduces an interesting, clear, arguable, and precise claim, based on the topic or text(s) and establishes the significance of the claim. The essay maintains strong focus on the purpose and task, using the whole essay to support and develop the claim and counterclaims fairly while thoroughly addressing demands of the prompt.
40.0 pts
Proficient
The essay introduces a clear, arguable, and specific claim, based on the topic or text(s). The essay maintains focus on the purpose and task, using most of the essay to support and develop the claim and counterclaims while thoroughly addressing the demands of the prompt.
30.0 pts
Developing
The essay introduces a clear, arguable, and specific claim, based on the topic or text(s), but it may somewhat unclear or not maintained throughout the essay. The essay may not fully address the demands of the prompt or stay focused on the purpose and task. The writing may ...
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101
e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity
The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay.
Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132)
In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original.
You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor.
Preliminary Steps
1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose.
2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues.
3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately.
A Possible Outline for Your Essay
Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s:
• Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet.
• Introduce & briefly summarize the main article:
· Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.)
· Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here.
• Respond:
· You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet.
· Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on.
· Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question.
· In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article).
· If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points.
· This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs.
• Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way.
Think it through!
Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response.
In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Criteria Ratings PointsContentAnalyzes theMaterial
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Analyzes the
Material
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
All elements of the
assigned topic are
clearly and completely
addressed in light of
applicable page
limits/presentation
length limits (5–7
pages or 10–12
minutes of
student-spoken audio).
Analyses flow in a
logical and effective
manner, address all
elements of the
assignment thoroughly
and reach the nuances
of the issues raised.
Complex issues are
navigated with
precision, clarity and
detail.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Major elements of
the assigned topic
are discussed in a
meaningful way
but the
paper/presentation
would benefit from
additional clarity,
depth, or detail.
Analyses are
generally well
constructed.
Complex issues
are recognized.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some elements of the
assigned topic are
mentioned but the
discussion is incomplete,
unclear, superficial, too
general or otherwise does
not meet expectations.
Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex
issues and nuances are
overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
Assigned
elements are not
discussed.
35 pts
Content
Organization
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
The
paper/presentation is
focused and well
organized. The
paper/presentation
has a clear thesis, and
a clear and
substantive
introduction and
conclusion. The
paper/presentation
effectively uses
headings and
subheadings as
appropriate to focus
and deepen analyses.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
The
paper/presentation
is reasonably well
organized and
follows a logical
path from idea to
idea and section to
section. The
paper/presentation
includes an
adequate
introduction and
conclusion.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The paper/presentation is
in need of additional
organization and clarity.
Ideas and/or sections of
the paper/presentation
either do not flow logically
or are in need of
fundamental improvement.
The paper is lacking an
adequate introduction
and/or conclusion.
0 pts
Not Present
The
paper/presentation
lacks meaningful
organization and
the paper lacks
and introduction
and conclusion.
35 pts
Research Paper or Presentation: Final Grading Rubric |
PSCI600_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Content
Evaluation,
Synthesis
and
Adequate
use of
Sources
35 to >30.0 pts
Advanced
Sources, concepts and
ideas are evaluated
critically and
synthesized in a
manner that moves
beyond restatement
and makes a valuable
contribution to the
assigned topic.
30 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Sources are used
correctly and
support the
paper’s analyses
and conclusions.
Concepts and
ideas are
understood and
linked in a
reasonable way
that supports the
paper’s
conclusions.
Paper reflects a
good familiarity
with the major
ideas but would
benefit from
greater critical
evaluation and
syntheses.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some sources are used
but not critically evaluated
and/or not used in an
effective manner.
Paper/presentation would
benefit from more
substantive use of sources,
more appropriate reliance
on sources, and/or better
skill in evaluating,
sy ...
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docx
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docx
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
Assignment InstructionsAssignment 1 SocializationDue by
Assignment Instructions
Assignment 1: Socialization
Due by 11:55p on Sunday of Week 3
Assignment 1 meets the following course objectives:
Apply a sociological perspective to the social world.
Analyze contemporary social issues using the sociological imagination and use sociological theories and concepts to analyze everyday life.
Demonstrate the ability to identify, locate, and retrieve information related to the topics in the course.
Describe culture and socialization
Purpose
The primary goal of this exercise is to apply your developing sociological knowledge and skills to the analysis of the process of socialization.
Writing Expectations
This should be 4-6 pages long, double-spaced, 11pt font (arial or times new roman), with 1" margins.
Instructions:
Describe and analyze the process of socialization.
Begin with responding to the question “Who Am I?” In your description, make sure to incorporate the concepts we have addressed in the course, such as roles, statuses, group membership, etc. Your response to this question should be at least 1+ page in length. Next,
analyze
at least
4 agents of socialization
that have affected your development as an individual, focusing on childhood socialization into adulthood. Consider, for example, the ways in which the family, religion, media, peers, and education have influenced your development, opportunities, and life choices. Your analysis of the process of socialization should be 3+ pages in length and incorporate
at least 4 sociological concepts or theories
covered in this course (hint: sociological concepts should be clearly identified and then applied; any paraphrasing or direct quotes used from another source should include APA formatted in-text citations and a full citation at the end of the essay. Examples of related concepts and theories include the self, moral development, nature and nurture, and resocialization).
Grading Rubric
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Who am I description
5 points
Exemplary
Detailed description of individual’s identity, roles, statuses as applicable
5 points
Accomplished
Discussed roles and statuses, including the setting and preparation as applicable
4.3 points
Developing
Discussed roles and statuses, some details lacking
3.8 points
Beginning
Briefly described roles and statuses, details lacking
3.3 points
Did not attempt
No discussion of roles and statuses or description lacks detail
0 points
Analysis of socialization
10 points
Exemplary
Clearly analyzed socialization process, identifying and describing 4+ influential agents of socialization
10 points
Accomplished
Discussed the socialization process, identifies and describes 4 influential agents of socialization
8.5 points
Developing
Discussed the socialization process; some detail lacking.
7.5 points
Beginning
Discussed meaning of the events; did not include cultural, symbolic, structural, or social meaning
6.5 points
Did ...
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Argument Position Essay Rubric
Content
15
10
5
1
90 total
Introduction
Well-developed introduction that engages readers and creates interest. Identifies a compelling, controversial issue/topic
Contains detailed background information on said topic.
Introduction creates interest.
Identifies a controversial issue/topic
Provides some background information.
Needs minor work.
Introduction is adequate, but does not catch the reader’s attention and/or does not clearly set up the purpose of the paper. Needs moderate work.
.
Introduction is inadequate and/or needs major work. Writer does not attempt to create interest. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related. Introduction is missing.
Thesis Statement
Clear thesis statement that identifies the main reasons that will support the position and direct the reader toward the point of the paper.
Thesis statement is arguable and the writer takes a clear stance.
Clear thesis statement is present, but may be lacking one reason or could be more engaging and/or direct.
Thesis statement is arguable
Thesis is vague and unclear. It requires effort on the part of the reader to discern the point of the paper and the reasons supporting your position.
Thesis is not arguable
Stance is unclear and vague
No thesis present, or thesis is so inadequate that the point of the paper is completely unclear.
Body Paragraphs
Body paragraphs include a topic sentence that connects to thesis and states the main focus of paragraph
Well-developed/relevant examples, details, and evidence.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content.
It is clear and focused, demonstrates original thought/reflection/insight. It holds the reader’s attention.
The paper effectively covers the topic.
Body paragraphs support thesis with examples, details, and evidence
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and adequately explain the content.
It is reasonably clear and focused, and the writer goes beyond the superficial or obvious. It holds the reader’s attention. On the whole, accurate details or clear thoughts are present to support the main idea (reasons).
. It effectively covers the topic.
Topic Sentences are vague and unclear
Body paragraphs offer adequate support to thesis, but examples, details, and support do not go far enough.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are present, but does not enhance and/or explain the content or demonstrate thought/reflection/analysis or specifics.
Lacks full development of ideas.
No topic sentences present
Inadequate number of major points/reasons. Body paragraphs inadequately support the thesis, and examples, details, and quotes are significantly underdeveloped.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are weak, inadequate, or missing.
. It shows no clear sense of purpose and does not reveal reflection. The text reads like a collection of ...
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)Du.docx
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT
(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)
Due Date: Monday, November 4th
Research Paper:
Write (using your own words) a well-developed paper of at least 5 pages long. You may include your own opinions as well as updated factual research. Research must be properly cited
Use at least 3 recent references (within the last 10 years or less)
Must include: Cover Page and a Works Cited Page in either MLA or APA Format that are not part of your 5 pages
Choose one from the following topics:
How much would it cost to raise a child from birth (including pregnancy and delivery) to age 18?
In vitro fertilization: what are the up-to-date methods and how does it work?
Abortion: what are the issues surrounding this topic?
Infertility: what's being done for those who are infertile?
5. Adoption: what are your options?
6. Child Abuse: what are the laws and long-term effects?
7. Surrogate parenting: what is involved and what is the process?
The paper will be graded on the following criteria:
Depth of thought - Evidence of serious reflection and research on the topic.
Content - Clear thesis statement with adequate support
Organization: Introduction, body, and conclusion
Usage and mechanics (proofread!)
12 pt times new roman font; double spaced; 1 inch margins
Proper Citations and Works Cited/Reference Page
Writing Assignment 2: Listening Styles Fall 2019
Part I: Discuss the importance of listening in interpersonal relationships. Define the word “Listening”. It might be beneficial to pick a specific relationship (i.e. parent/coworker/significant other/child/friend/teacher). Give a story on how listening is important to that specific relationship.
Part II: Take time to read each of the following statements (in the chart below). Score each of the statements on a scale from 1-7
Strong Disagree – 1 Disagree – 2 Somewhat Disagree – 3 Unsure – 4 Somewhat Agree – 5 Agree – 6 Strong Agree – 7
Analyze your results. Tell me which category you are best at and why. Tell me what you are worst at and why you think you are bad at it. NOTE: I do not need to see your results. Do NOT post the chart!
Part III: On pages 210-212 in the book you will see The Challenges of Listening. Choose one of the barriers discussed. For example “information overload” or “defensive listening” or “ambushing”. You need to first DEFINE the word you are using. Second you need to EXPLAIN to me how this word applies to you and how you plan on getting better at it.
Relational Listening
When listening to others, it is important to understand the feelings of the speaker.
When listening to others, I am mainly concerned with how they are feeling.
I listen to understand the emotions and mood of the speaker.
I listen primarily to build and maintain relationships with others.
I enjoy listening to others because it allows me to connect with them.
When listening to others, I focus on un ...
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to men's health. Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Topic 1: Colorectal Cancer Screening
A 47-year-old man presents to your clinic for a routine physical. He considers himself to be “fairly healthy” and doesn’t routinely go to the doctor. His last physical was five years ago. In reviewing his chart, you see that his BMI is 30, he exercises twice a week at the local gym, and he does not take any medication. Part of your discussion during today’s visit is about screening for colorectal cancers. He did endorse some constipation in the review of systems. He noted an uncle in his family history who was diagnosed at age 54 with colon cancer. You begin to talk about colorectal screening, and the patient interrupts you and tells you that he is only 47 and that he should not have to worry about it until he is 50.
What are the recommendations and source(s) for the colorectal cancer screening test?
The patient thinks he does not have to worry about “being screened” until age 50. Is he correct? Why or why not? What age would you recommend screening for this patient and why? Does his family history come into play here?
What age would you recommend screening for this patient and why? Does his family history come into play here?
What are the screening options for this patient, and which would you recommend? Why?
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cit.
Persuasive Essay Rubric
This document outlines criteria for evaluating arguments on a scale of A to D. Criteria A represents the highest level and includes clearly stating a claim, proposing a solution, providing clear evidence from multiple sources, and discussing opposing viewpoints. Criteria B represents a lower but still good level, where the claim and evidence may be less clear or complete. Criteria C is lower yet, where the claim is unclear, evidence is weak, and opposing views are not addressed specifically. Criteria D is the lowest level, where the argument, evidence, and opposing views are not adequately presented or discussed.
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
- Addison's disease is a disorder that was chosen to research. The key aspects that must be discussed include the pathophysiology, most common presenting symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and a standard treatment plan. National screening and treatment guidelines should also be referenced if available.
- Additional scholarly sources beyond the course materials should be used. When researching, look for unique information that may surprise the reader rather than just common facts.
- The discussion post will be evaluated based on criteria such as the quality of the initial post and peer responses, use of scholarly sources, organization, grammar and APA style.
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The document outlines an assignment for a reflection paper on topics related to ergogenic aids, training at altitude, and their application to physical therapy. It provides instructions for the paper, including a length of 2-3 pages in APA format with a minimum of 3 outside sources. A grading rubric is included that will evaluate comprehension of material, development of main points, critical thinking, use of resources, synthesis, writing style, punctuation/grammar, and more. The paper is due on August 16, 2019.
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention
(primary prevention is most important in adult learning). Review the five levels of prevention and then focus on primary prevention. Offer three innovative ways in which to engage the adult population.
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Part.
Form 1009WWritten Communication AssessmentIntroduction.docx
Form 1009W
Written Communication Assessment
Introduction 0 Points
Missing
thesis.
1 Points
Weak thesis
2 Points
Thesis is not
focused or
relevant to
the writer's
purpose.
3 Points
Thesis is
partially
focused or
relevant to
the writer's
purpose.
4 Points
Thesis is
sufficiently
stated and
focused.
5 Points
Thesis is
clearly
stated,
focused, and
specific.
Development
-Support
0 Points
Major points
do not
support
thesis.
1 Points
Major points
offer weak
support for
thesis or are
poorly
developed.
2 Points
Major points
partially
support
thesis.
3 Points
Major points
sufficiently
support
thesis.
4 Points
Major points
fully support
thesis.
5 Points
Major and
minor points
fully support
thesis
throughout.
Development-
Points of View
0 Points
Fails to
consider any
other points
of view.
1 Points
Mentions one
additional
point of view.
2 Points
Presents
other points
of view but
does not
reason
through
them.
3 Points
Presents
other points
of view and
partially
reasons
through
them.
4 Points
Discusses
multiple
points of
view.
5 Points
Thoroughly
introduces
and
discusses
multiple
points of
view.
Development
-Sequencing
0 Points
No rational
sequencing
of
major/minor
points.
1 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points confuses
writer's purpose.
2 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points displays
weak support
for writer's
purpose.
3 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points partially
supports
writer's purpose
4 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points effectively
supports writer's
purpose
5 Points
Superb
sequencing of
major/minor
points
thoroughly
supports
writer's purpose
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Development-
Analysis
0 Points
Fails to show
how
evidence
supports
main
points/thesis.
1 Points
Minimal
analysis to link
evidence to
main
points/thesis.
2 Points
Partial
analysis of
evidence to
show how it
supports
main
points/thesis.
3 Points
Some
analysis of
evidence to
show how it
supports
main
points/thesis.
4 Points
Clear
reasoning
that
sufficiently
ties
supporting
evidence to
main
points/thesis.
5 Points
Clear and
thorough
reasoning
that shows
how
evidence
supports
main
points/thesis.
Development-
Transitions/Flow
0 Points
No
transitions.
1 Points
Weak
transitions
throughout
disrupt flow.
2 Points
Several
transitions
are weak or
unclear.
3 Points
Transitions
are mostly
sufficient to
maintain flow.
4 Points
Transitions
effectively
connect
major/minor
points.
5 Points
Smooth
transitions
throughout
enhance
readability.
Conclusion 0 Points
No
conclusion.
1 Points
Conclusion
Does not
support the
thesis, is
disconnected
from the
evidence and
re ...
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 3: STANCE ESSAY
Due Week 10 and worth 230 points
Congratulations! You made it to your final assignment, and you have learned so much along the way.
• In the personal essay, you learned how to write with a strong personal voice.
• In the informative essay, you learned how to write objectively and support your points with credible sources to
inform the audience.
Now in your final assignment, you will combine these writing techniques to write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a
position on a topic and argues and supports that position with evidence. Consider your topic:
• What possible positions/arguments are there?
• What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
• What are your main points?
• What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
• Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except
you should maintain a formal tone. And just like assignment 2, you will need to support your points with credible sources.
You’re ready to take a position on the topic you have been writing about and to be persuasive!
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your atitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
...
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook. (Do not use lay press Internet sites).
Include the following in your initial post:
Explanation of the pathophysiology of the diagnosis.
Description of the drug category: Overview of use/action.
Analysis of the specific agents:
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacotherapeutics, adverse drug reactions, interactions, monitoring, patient education
Please choose two diagnoses from the following list:
Migraine
Seizure Disorder
Alzheimer’s Disease
Bell’s Palsy
Insomnia
For each of the two diagnoses you choose, select two drug categories used for treatment.
For each of the two drug categories, choose two specific pharmacological agents.
Course Text book :
Woo, Terri Moser and Robinson, Marylou V. (2020).
Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers
. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate pr.
Excellent Satisfactory Basic MINIMUM WORD COUNT A mini.docx
Excellent Satisfactory Basic
MINIMUM WORD COUNT
A minimum length of 500 words within the body of the
assignment. 6 pts
Word count is LESS THAN 500 words
within body of assignment. 3 pts
UNDERSTANDING AND ACCURATE APPLICATION OF COURSE CONCEPT/ASSIGNED TOPIC
Assignment content reflects full
understanding of course concept.
5 pts
Assignment applies course concept
accurately. 4 pts
Assignment content reflects some
understanding of course concept. 3 pts
Assignment mostly applies course
concept accurately. 2 pts
Assignment content reflects limited
understanding of course concept.
2 pts
Assignment applies course
concept inaccurately. 1 pt.
DEPTH OF ANALYSIS
Assignment displays significant
depth of analysis.
6 pts
Assignment relates to course
concept/assigned topic. 2 pts
Assignment displays some depth of
analysis. 4 pts
Assignment is mostly relevant to the
course concept/assigned topic. 1 pt
Assignment suffers from limited
depth of analysis. 3 pts
Assignment is mostly irrelevant to the
course concept/assigned topic. 0 pts
PROVIDING SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE WITH REASONED IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Assignment mostly incorporates
specific content and examples from
course material to competently
substantiate independent points
and ideas. 4 pts
Reasoned implications and
conclusions are also clearly and
accurately identified. 5 pts
Assignment incorporates some use of
specific content and examples from
course material which may be mostly
but not fully appropriate to
substantiating points and ideas. 2 pts
Reasoned implications and conclusion
limited with low to moderate level of
accuracy. 2 pts
Assignment incorporates limited use
of specific content and examples
from course material are mostly
irrelevant and do not support the
ideas being developed. 1 pt
Reasoned implications and
conclusions absent. 1 pt
INCORPORATING EXTERNAL SOURCES
Assignment accurately incorporates
2 or more external sources plus any
course resources (text chapter,
video) used. 6 pts
All references and citations of
external sources fully utilize APA
format. 4 pts
(Both in-text citations and
references required. No title page
is needed.)
Assignment accurately incorporates 1
external source plus any course
resources used. 4 pts
Some references and citations of
external sources utilize APA format.
3 pts
(Both in-text citations and references
required. No title page is needed.)
Assignment only incorporates course
resources used, but no external
source. 2 pts
No included references and
citations of external sources
utilize APA format. 2 pts
(Both in-text citations and
references required. No title page
is needed.)
LANGUAGE, SPELLING, AND GRAMMAR
Assignment is written using
language that is clear, concise and
easy to understand. 4 pts
Content has few to no grammar or
spelling errors. 4 pts
Assignment is adequately writt.
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The document provides instructions and evaluation criteria for an argument essay assignment. Students must write a 3-4 page essay arguing one side of an issue related to climate change, universal healthcare, or employer access to social media. The essay must have an introduction with a thesis, 3 body paragraphs with evidence from sources, and a conclusion. It will be evaluated on the introduction and conclusion, organization, argument development, use of sources, length, writing quality, and following APA format.
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Argumentative Research.docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition
Argumentative Research Essay
Essay for ENG 130: Argumentative Research Essay
Source Materials:
“The Hanging Stranger” by Philip K. Dick
“All Summer in a Day” by Ray Bradbury
“A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor
“Literary Analysis: Using Elements of Literature” by Roane State.
Background:
In the previous unit, you wrote a prewrite introduction/outline. In this unit’s Argumentative Research
Essay, you will transition your prewrite into a 4-5 page essay that defends your thesis using literary
elements. Your essay should defend the following prompt:
Prompt:
Many authors write about the theme, “If an individual does not follow the rules of society, there can
be negative, sometimes violent, consequences.”
Which of the three stories portrays this theme most effectively? How?
Hint to success: Use three literary elements to support your answer. For example, “Dick portrays this
theme most effectively through his use of tone, conflict, and characterization.
Instructions:
Read through all of the instructions of this assignment.
Read all of the above resources.
Select one of the three short stories to write about.
Your audience for this essay are people who have read the stories.
You need to use the Library resources or other search engines to collect at least two
scholarly sources that will defend your thesis. One of these sources must defend your
counterargument.
Your essay will have the following components:
o An Introduction: see unit resources
o A thesis at the end of the introduction that clearly states your position on which author
most clearly portrays this theme.
o Three supporting sections of the body that defend your thesis
Each section should incorporate both text support and research support. Each
quote, paraphrase or new information requires an in text citation.
o A paragraph for the counterargument: see unit resources.
The counterargument would be the main argument for the opposite of your
thesis
o A concluding paragraph: see unit resources.
http://americanliterature.com/author/philip-k-dick/short-story/the-hanging-stranger
https://postu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=49762708&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://postu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=29993364&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://www.roanestate.edu/owl/elementslit.html
Requirements:
Length and format: 4-5 pages.
The title page and reference page are also required, but they should not be factored into the
4-5 page length of the essay.
It should also be double spaced, written in Times New Roman, in 12 point font and with 1 inch
margins. Essay should conform to APA formatting and citation style.
Use the third-person, objective voice, avoiding personal pronouns such as “I,” “you,” “we,” etc.
Plea ...
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraphs (450- 500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.
Topic: Heart Failure
ML is a retired registered nurse (RN) who has been given the diagnosis of Stage A heart failure. She knows from her RN education that she will definitely be placed on digoxin as a therapy. She remembers something about halos as something to be attuned to.
Explain the pathophysiology of Stage A heart failure.
What is the rational drug choice for treatment of this individual?
Address the patient’s concern about halos should digoxin be prescribed.
Are there gender considerations related to medication treatment in this scenario? If so, what are they? For example, do men and women differ in their side effect profile and/or complications (for instance, from digoxin)?
Discuss monitoring of the pharmacological agent(s) selected.
RUBRIC:
ote:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements..
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. Instructions
Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
B. Think About Your Writing
Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)?Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)?Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?
C. Argumentative Essay Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines. Print this checklist!
Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
· If you'd like to have your thesis statement reviewed prior to submitting your full essay, you may email your thesis to [email protected] with "Working Thesis" in the subject line.*Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?Organization and Flow
❒ Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
❒ Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
❒ Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?Style
❒ Are the word choices accurate and effective?
❒ Are the sentence structures varied?Conventions and Formatting
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you double-checked for ...
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable population group that you choose during Week 1 for your paper. Select one of the following topics and respond to the thread corresponding to the question/discussion, utilizing at least three scholarly references to support your post. As a class, please make sure that all topics are addressed.
Analyze how you could motivate the vulnerable population that you chose in Week 1 ( Transgender) to make changes What is your primary health concern for this group and what theory might you utilize to encourage them to make behavior changes?
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported ...
disease.docx
- Addison's disease is caused by a lack of cortisol and aldosterone hormones produced by the adrenal glands.
- Common presenting symptoms include fatigue, weight loss, low blood pressure, and darkening of the skin.
- The disease is routinely diagnosed through blood tests measuring cortisol and aldosterone levels and confirmed with specialized medical imaging tests.
- Standard treatment involves corticosteroid hormone replacement therapy through medications like hydrocortisone to manage symptoms.
Essay 4 Speculating about Causes Quality Criteria NoL.docx
Essay 4: Speculating about Causes
Quality Criteria No/Limited Proficiency
(1)
Minimal Proficiency (2) Proficiency (3) High Proficiency (4)
A focused, well-
defined
phenomenon and
thesis
Phenomenon is not
explained. Thesis is
missing.
Reader cannot
determine
phenomenon/thesis and
purpose or thesis has no
relation to the writing
task.
Phenomenon is not well-
developed.
Phenomenon/Thesis and
topic are somewhat
vague or only loosely
related to the writing
task.
Phenomenon is
competently developed,
but still has some
weaknesses.
Phenomenon/Thesis and
purpose are fairly clear
and match the writing
task.
Substantially, logically, and
concretely defined
phenomenon. Details are
germane, original, and
convincingly interpreted.
Phenomenon/Thesis is clear
and specific. Develops fresh
insight.
Well-argued causes Offers simplistic,
undeveloped, or cryptic
causes. Inappropriate or
off topic generalizations.
Causes are irrelevant to
thesis. There are faulty
assumptions and errors
of fact.
Offers a cause(s) that are
too underdeveloped.
Details are too general,
not interpreted, or
inappropriately
repetitive.
Offers a solid cause(s).
Assumptions are not
always recognized or
made explicit. Contains
mostly appropriate details
or examples.
Develops fresh insight.
Substantial, logical, and
concrete development of
causes. Details are
germane, original, and
convincingly interpreted.
An effective
response to
objections
Fails to include a
response to readers’
objections.
Responses to readers’
objections are
underdeveloped or
vague. Perhaps only
offers an objection but
no response to that
objection.
Offers solid objections and
responses to objections.
Contains mostly
appropriate responses but
some might not be
germane or original.
Effectively anticipates and
appropriately responds to
readers' likely objections in
a detailed manner.
A clear, logical
organization
Unclear organization. No
or very few transitions.
No or very few topic
sentences. Paragraphs
aren’t focused. Flow
between topics and
paragraphs is confusing.
Some signs of logical
organization. May have
abrupt or illogical shifts
and ineffective flow or
ideas. Weak topic
sentences. Paragraph
structure could be
improved.
Organization supports
thesis and purpose.
Transitions are mostly
appropriate. But sequence
of ideas or paragraph
structure could still be
improved.
Fully and imaginatively
supports thesis and
purpose. Sequence of ideas
is effective. Transitions,
topic sentences, and
paragraph structure are
effective.
Use of sources/APA
format and English
grammar and
vocabulary
Neglects important
sources. Uses 0 sources.
Possibly uses source
material without
acknowledgement. Does
not demonstrate
proficiency in English
grammar, vocabulary,
and sentence structure.
No or little
understanding of APA.
Uses a somewhat
relevant source.
Quotations and
parap ...
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
Writing Assignment 2 Listening Styles Fall 2019Part I Discuss .docx
Writing Assignment 2: Listening Styles Fall 2019
Part I: Discuss the importance of listening in interpersonal relationships. Define the word “Listening”. It might be beneficial to pick a specific relationship (i.e. parent/coworker/significant other/child/friend/teacher). Give a story on how listening is important to that specific relationship.
Part II: Take time to read each of the following statements (in the chart below). Score each of the statements on a scale from 1-7
Strong Disagree – 1 Disagree – 2 Somewhat Disagree – 3 Unsure – 4 Somewhat Agree – 5 Agree – 6 Strong Agree – 7
Analyze your results. Tell me which category you are best at and why. Tell me what you are worst at and why you think you are bad at it. NOTE: I do not need to see your results. Do NOT post the chart!Part III: On pages 210-212 in the book you will see The Challenges of Listening. Choose one of the barriers discussed. For example “information overload” or “defensive listening” or “ambushing”. You need to first DEFINE the word you are using. Second you need to EXPLAIN to me how this word applies to you and how you plan on getting better at it.
Relational Listening
When listening to others, it is important to understand the feelings of the speaker.
When listening to others, I am mainly concerned with how they are feeling.
I listen to understand the emotions and mood of the speaker.
I listen primarily to build and maintain relationships with others.
I enjoy listening to others because it allows me to connect with them.
When listening to others, I focus on understanding the feelings behind words.
Relational Listening Total Score
Analytical Listening
I wait until all the facts are presented before forming judgments and opinions.
I tend to withhold judgment about another’s ideas until I have heard everything they have to say.
When listening to others, I attempt to withhold making an opinion until I’ve heard their entire message.
When listening to others, I consider all sides of the issue before responding.
I fully listen to what a person has to say before forming any opinions.
To be fair to others, I fully listen to what they have to say before making judgments.
Analytical Listening Total Score
Task-Oriented (Transactional) Listening
I am impatient with people who ramble on during conversations.
I get frustrated when people get off topic during a conversation.
When listening to others, I become impatient when they appear to be wasting time.
I prefer speakers who quickly get to the point.
I find it difficult to listen to people who take too long to get their ideas across.
When listening to others, I appreciate speakers who give brief, to the-point presentations.
Transactional Listening Total Score
Critical Listening
When listening to others, I focus on any inconsistencies and/or errors in what’s being said. ...
Homework assignmentPlease annotate one artwork you like from this.docx
Homework assignment:
Please annotate one artwork you like from this week’s textbook
reading or Smarthistory. Whenever I am writing for research
presentation or publication, this is how I begin. The point is to make
sure you’re not missing anything in terms of basic data or
interpretive frameworks. When I take notes on a lecture at a
conference, this is the way I like to organize my notes, as well.
Format
Identify the artwork
Identify Period Style
Identify Subject Matter
Discuss Historical Context
Discuss Visual Elements (Line, Color, Texture, Composition etc.)
Discuss Its Place in Ideas or Culture of the Time
.
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense an.docx
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense and Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA), which are missions executed by the Department of Defense (DOD), most specifically by the Combatant Command, United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). In supporting the nation when requested by DHS, FEMA, or other lead federal agencies, or as directed by the president or the secretary of defense, DOD provides many unique capabilities for crisis response. One specific function used most notably during the post-Hurricane Katrina period was the use of airborne assets to provide damage assessments and to gauge the extent of the sea surge at various times during the recovery.
The function of deploying such assets is traditionally called
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
(ISR). Yet the U.S. military cannot legally collect intelligence on U.S. citizens. Consequently, the action, as performed during the hurricane recovery operations described here, is known as
incident awareness and assessments
(IAA). For some, the difference between these terms is merely semantics; for many, IAA differs both symbolically and practically from ISR, if not in how information is collected, then in how it is used and the motivation behind the collection. (The Web site for IAA reference is under Web sites references below.)
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in 5–7 paragraphs:
Do you believe the distinction between ISR and IAA lies simply with terminology (and therefore there is little or no difference) or that there is a separation between the concepts? Explain and defend your answer fully. You may choose to research the topic more fully.
Contemplating the ethics of using IAA in the homeland, list at least 3 benefits of its use where ethics might potentially be secondary.
List at least 2–3 costs or opposing views to its use and how IAA—or the information gathered—might be misused or abused.
What if criminal activity (like acres of tended marijuana) was observed during IAA missions intended to conduct damage assessments? How should such information be handled?
Do you believe converting the term
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
to
incident awareness and assessments
for operations conducted in the homeland was wise or frivolous (or described otherwise)? Explain and defend your answer fully.
What is the value of using carefully selected terminology for operations in the homeland?
How does the symbolism of IAA potentially aid homeland security professionals in performing their jobs?
How does the symbolism of ISR potentially hinder homeland security professionals in performing their jobs?
Among the Web sites listed for this unit, you will find the Air Forces North (AFNORTH) Incident Awareness and Assessment Handbook, June 2010.
Why do you think this manual on IAA is available from open-source sites?
Do you think there might be ethical considerations to publicizing the use and purposes of IAA? Name and discuss at least 1.
More Related Content
Similar to Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a r.docx
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)Du.docx
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT
(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)
Due Date: Monday, November 4th
Research Paper:
Write (using your own words) a well-developed paper of at least 5 pages long. You may include your own opinions as well as updated factual research. Research must be properly cited
Use at least 3 recent references (within the last 10 years or less)
Must include: Cover Page and a Works Cited Page in either MLA or APA Format that are not part of your 5 pages
Choose one from the following topics:
How much would it cost to raise a child from birth (including pregnancy and delivery) to age 18?
In vitro fertilization: what are the up-to-date methods and how does it work?
Abortion: what are the issues surrounding this topic?
Infertility: what's being done for those who are infertile?
5. Adoption: what are your options?
6. Child Abuse: what are the laws and long-term effects?
7. Surrogate parenting: what is involved and what is the process?
The paper will be graded on the following criteria:
Depth of thought - Evidence of serious reflection and research on the topic.
Content - Clear thesis statement with adequate support
Organization: Introduction, body, and conclusion
Usage and mechanics (proofread!)
12 pt times new roman font; double spaced; 1 inch margins
Proper Citations and Works Cited/Reference Page
Writing Assignment 2: Listening Styles Fall 2019
Part I: Discuss the importance of listening in interpersonal relationships. Define the word “Listening”. It might be beneficial to pick a specific relationship (i.e. parent/coworker/significant other/child/friend/teacher). Give a story on how listening is important to that specific relationship.
Part II: Take time to read each of the following statements (in the chart below). Score each of the statements on a scale from 1-7
Strong Disagree – 1 Disagree – 2 Somewhat Disagree – 3 Unsure – 4 Somewhat Agree – 5 Agree – 6 Strong Agree – 7
Analyze your results. Tell me which category you are best at and why. Tell me what you are worst at and why you think you are bad at it. NOTE: I do not need to see your results. Do NOT post the chart!
Part III: On pages 210-212 in the book you will see The Challenges of Listening. Choose one of the barriers discussed. For example “information overload” or “defensive listening” or “ambushing”. You need to first DEFINE the word you are using. Second you need to EXPLAIN to me how this word applies to you and how you plan on getting better at it.
Relational Listening
When listening to others, it is important to understand the feelings of the speaker.
When listening to others, I am mainly concerned with how they are feeling.
I listen to understand the emotions and mood of the speaker.
I listen primarily to build and maintain relationships with others.
I enjoy listening to others because it allows me to connect with them.
When listening to others, I focus on un ...
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to men's health. Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Topic 1: Colorectal Cancer Screening
A 47-year-old man presents to your clinic for a routine physical. He considers himself to be “fairly healthy” and doesn’t routinely go to the doctor. His last physical was five years ago. In reviewing his chart, you see that his BMI is 30, he exercises twice a week at the local gym, and he does not take any medication. Part of your discussion during today’s visit is about screening for colorectal cancers. He did endorse some constipation in the review of systems. He noted an uncle in his family history who was diagnosed at age 54 with colon cancer. You begin to talk about colorectal screening, and the patient interrupts you and tells you that he is only 47 and that he should not have to worry about it until he is 50.
What are the recommendations and source(s) for the colorectal cancer screening test?
The patient thinks he does not have to worry about “being screened” until age 50. Is he correct? Why or why not? What age would you recommend screening for this patient and why? Does his family history come into play here?
What age would you recommend screening for this patient and why? Does his family history come into play here?
What are the screening options for this patient, and which would you recommend? Why?
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cit.
Persuasive Essay Rubric
This document outlines criteria for evaluating arguments on a scale of A to D. Criteria A represents the highest level and includes clearly stating a claim, proposing a solution, providing clear evidence from multiple sources, and discussing opposing viewpoints. Criteria B represents a lower but still good level, where the claim and evidence may be less clear or complete. Criteria C is lower yet, where the claim is unclear, evidence is weak, and opposing views are not addressed specifically. Criteria D is the lowest level, where the argument, evidence, and opposing views are not adequately presented or discussed.
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
- Addison's disease is a disorder that was chosen to research. The key aspects that must be discussed include the pathophysiology, most common presenting symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and a standard treatment plan. National screening and treatment guidelines should also be referenced if available.
- Additional scholarly sources beyond the course materials should be used. When researching, look for unique information that may surprise the reader rather than just common facts.
- The discussion post will be evaluated based on criteria such as the quality of the initial post and peer responses, use of scholarly sources, organization, grammar and APA style.
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The document outlines an assignment for a reflection paper on topics related to ergogenic aids, training at altitude, and their application to physical therapy. It provides instructions for the paper, including a length of 2-3 pages in APA format with a minimum of 3 outside sources. A grading rubric is included that will evaluate comprehension of material, development of main points, critical thinking, use of resources, synthesis, writing style, punctuation/grammar, and more. The paper is due on August 16, 2019.
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention
(primary prevention is most important in adult learning). Review the five levels of prevention and then focus on primary prevention. Offer three innovative ways in which to engage the adult population.
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Part.
Form 1009WWritten Communication AssessmentIntroduction.docx
Form 1009W
Written Communication Assessment
Introduction 0 Points
Missing
thesis.
1 Points
Weak thesis
2 Points
Thesis is not
focused or
relevant to
the writer's
purpose.
3 Points
Thesis is
partially
focused or
relevant to
the writer's
purpose.
4 Points
Thesis is
sufficiently
stated and
focused.
5 Points
Thesis is
clearly
stated,
focused, and
specific.
Development
-Support
0 Points
Major points
do not
support
thesis.
1 Points
Major points
offer weak
support for
thesis or are
poorly
developed.
2 Points
Major points
partially
support
thesis.
3 Points
Major points
sufficiently
support
thesis.
4 Points
Major points
fully support
thesis.
5 Points
Major and
minor points
fully support
thesis
throughout.
Development-
Points of View
0 Points
Fails to
consider any
other points
of view.
1 Points
Mentions one
additional
point of view.
2 Points
Presents
other points
of view but
does not
reason
through
them.
3 Points
Presents
other points
of view and
partially
reasons
through
them.
4 Points
Discusses
multiple
points of
view.
5 Points
Thoroughly
introduces
and
discusses
multiple
points of
view.
Development
-Sequencing
0 Points
No rational
sequencing
of
major/minor
points.
1 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points confuses
writer's purpose.
2 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points displays
weak support
for writer's
purpose.
3 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points partially
supports
writer's purpose
4 Points
Sequencing of
major/minor
points effectively
supports writer's
purpose
5 Points
Superb
sequencing of
major/minor
points
thoroughly
supports
writer's purpose
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Development-
Analysis
0 Points
Fails to show
how
evidence
supports
main
points/thesis.
1 Points
Minimal
analysis to link
evidence to
main
points/thesis.
2 Points
Partial
analysis of
evidence to
show how it
supports
main
points/thesis.
3 Points
Some
analysis of
evidence to
show how it
supports
main
points/thesis.
4 Points
Clear
reasoning
that
sufficiently
ties
supporting
evidence to
main
points/thesis.
5 Points
Clear and
thorough
reasoning
that shows
how
evidence
supports
main
points/thesis.
Development-
Transitions/Flow
0 Points
No
transitions.
1 Points
Weak
transitions
throughout
disrupt flow.
2 Points
Several
transitions
are weak or
unclear.
3 Points
Transitions
are mostly
sufficient to
maintain flow.
4 Points
Transitions
effectively
connect
major/minor
points.
5 Points
Smooth
transitions
throughout
enhance
readability.
Conclusion 0 Points
No
conclusion.
1 Points
Conclusion
Does not
support the
thesis, is
disconnected
from the
evidence and
re ...
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 3: STANCE ESSAY
Due Week 10 and worth 230 points
Congratulations! You made it to your final assignment, and you have learned so much along the way.
• In the personal essay, you learned how to write with a strong personal voice.
• In the informative essay, you learned how to write objectively and support your points with credible sources to
inform the audience.
Now in your final assignment, you will combine these writing techniques to write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a
position on a topic and argues and supports that position with evidence. Consider your topic:
• What possible positions/arguments are there?
• What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
• What are your main points?
• What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
• Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except
you should maintain a formal tone. And just like assignment 2, you will need to support your points with credible sources.
You’re ready to take a position on the topic you have been writing about and to be persuasive!
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your atitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
...
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook. (Do not use lay press Internet sites).
Include the following in your initial post:
Explanation of the pathophysiology of the diagnosis.
Description of the drug category: Overview of use/action.
Analysis of the specific agents:
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacotherapeutics, adverse drug reactions, interactions, monitoring, patient education
Please choose two diagnoses from the following list:
Migraine
Seizure Disorder
Alzheimer’s Disease
Bell’s Palsy
Insomnia
For each of the two diagnoses you choose, select two drug categories used for treatment.
For each of the two drug categories, choose two specific pharmacological agents.
Course Text book :
Woo, Terri Moser and Robinson, Marylou V. (2020).
Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers
. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate pr.
Excellent Satisfactory Basic MINIMUM WORD COUNT A mini.docx
Excellent Satisfactory Basic
MINIMUM WORD COUNT
A minimum length of 500 words within the body of the
assignment. 6 pts
Word count is LESS THAN 500 words
within body of assignment. 3 pts
UNDERSTANDING AND ACCURATE APPLICATION OF COURSE CONCEPT/ASSIGNED TOPIC
Assignment content reflects full
understanding of course concept.
5 pts
Assignment applies course concept
accurately. 4 pts
Assignment content reflects some
understanding of course concept. 3 pts
Assignment mostly applies course
concept accurately. 2 pts
Assignment content reflects limited
understanding of course concept.
2 pts
Assignment applies course
concept inaccurately. 1 pt.
DEPTH OF ANALYSIS
Assignment displays significant
depth of analysis.
6 pts
Assignment relates to course
concept/assigned topic. 2 pts
Assignment displays some depth of
analysis. 4 pts
Assignment is mostly relevant to the
course concept/assigned topic. 1 pt
Assignment suffers from limited
depth of analysis. 3 pts
Assignment is mostly irrelevant to the
course concept/assigned topic. 0 pts
PROVIDING SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE WITH REASONED IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Assignment mostly incorporates
specific content and examples from
course material to competently
substantiate independent points
and ideas. 4 pts
Reasoned implications and
conclusions are also clearly and
accurately identified. 5 pts
Assignment incorporates some use of
specific content and examples from
course material which may be mostly
but not fully appropriate to
substantiating points and ideas. 2 pts
Reasoned implications and conclusion
limited with low to moderate level of
accuracy. 2 pts
Assignment incorporates limited use
of specific content and examples
from course material are mostly
irrelevant and do not support the
ideas being developed. 1 pt
Reasoned implications and
conclusions absent. 1 pt
INCORPORATING EXTERNAL SOURCES
Assignment accurately incorporates
2 or more external sources plus any
course resources (text chapter,
video) used. 6 pts
All references and citations of
external sources fully utilize APA
format. 4 pts
(Both in-text citations and
references required. No title page
is needed.)
Assignment accurately incorporates 1
external source plus any course
resources used. 4 pts
Some references and citations of
external sources utilize APA format.
3 pts
(Both in-text citations and references
required. No title page is needed.)
Assignment only incorporates course
resources used, but no external
source. 2 pts
No included references and
citations of external sources
utilize APA format. 2 pts
(Both in-text citations and
references required. No title page
is needed.)
LANGUAGE, SPELLING, AND GRAMMAR
Assignment is written using
language that is clear, concise and
easy to understand. 4 pts
Content has few to no grammar or
spelling errors. 4 pts
Assignment is adequately writt.
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The document provides instructions and evaluation criteria for an argument essay assignment. Students must write a 3-4 page essay arguing one side of an issue related to climate change, universal healthcare, or employer access to social media. The essay must have an introduction with a thesis, 3 body paragraphs with evidence from sources, and a conclusion. It will be evaluated on the introduction and conclusion, organization, argument development, use of sources, length, writing quality, and following APA format.
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Argumentative Research.docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition
Argumentative Research Essay
Essay for ENG 130: Argumentative Research Essay
Source Materials:
“The Hanging Stranger” by Philip K. Dick
“All Summer in a Day” by Ray Bradbury
“A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor
“Literary Analysis: Using Elements of Literature” by Roane State.
Background:
In the previous unit, you wrote a prewrite introduction/outline. In this unit’s Argumentative Research
Essay, you will transition your prewrite into a 4-5 page essay that defends your thesis using literary
elements. Your essay should defend the following prompt:
Prompt:
Many authors write about the theme, “If an individual does not follow the rules of society, there can
be negative, sometimes violent, consequences.”
Which of the three stories portrays this theme most effectively? How?
Hint to success: Use three literary elements to support your answer. For example, “Dick portrays this
theme most effectively through his use of tone, conflict, and characterization.
Instructions:
Read through all of the instructions of this assignment.
Read all of the above resources.
Select one of the three short stories to write about.
Your audience for this essay are people who have read the stories.
You need to use the Library resources or other search engines to collect at least two
scholarly sources that will defend your thesis. One of these sources must defend your
counterargument.
Your essay will have the following components:
o An Introduction: see unit resources
o A thesis at the end of the introduction that clearly states your position on which author
most clearly portrays this theme.
o Three supporting sections of the body that defend your thesis
Each section should incorporate both text support and research support. Each
quote, paraphrase or new information requires an in text citation.
o A paragraph for the counterargument: see unit resources.
The counterargument would be the main argument for the opposite of your
thesis
o A concluding paragraph: see unit resources.
http://americanliterature.com/author/philip-k-dick/short-story/the-hanging-stranger
https://postu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=49762708&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://postu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=29993364&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://www.roanestate.edu/owl/elementslit.html
Requirements:
Length and format: 4-5 pages.
The title page and reference page are also required, but they should not be factored into the
4-5 page length of the essay.
It should also be double spaced, written in Times New Roman, in 12 point font and with 1 inch
margins. Essay should conform to APA formatting and citation style.
Use the third-person, objective voice, avoiding personal pronouns such as “I,” “you,” “we,” etc.
Plea ...
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraphs (450- 500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.
Topic: Heart Failure
ML is a retired registered nurse (RN) who has been given the diagnosis of Stage A heart failure. She knows from her RN education that she will definitely be placed on digoxin as a therapy. She remembers something about halos as something to be attuned to.
Explain the pathophysiology of Stage A heart failure.
What is the rational drug choice for treatment of this individual?
Address the patient’s concern about halos should digoxin be prescribed.
Are there gender considerations related to medication treatment in this scenario? If so, what are they? For example, do men and women differ in their side effect profile and/or complications (for instance, from digoxin)?
Discuss monitoring of the pharmacological agent(s) selected.
RUBRIC:
ote:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements..
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. Instructions
Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
B. Think About Your Writing
Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)?Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)?Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?
C. Argumentative Essay Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines. Print this checklist!
Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
· If you'd like to have your thesis statement reviewed prior to submitting your full essay, you may email your thesis to [email protected] with "Working Thesis" in the subject line.*Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?Organization and Flow
❒ Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
❒ Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
❒ Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?Style
❒ Are the word choices accurate and effective?
❒ Are the sentence structures varied?Conventions and Formatting
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you double-checked for ...
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable population group that you choose during Week 1 for your paper. Select one of the following topics and respond to the thread corresponding to the question/discussion, utilizing at least three scholarly references to support your post. As a class, please make sure that all topics are addressed.
Analyze how you could motivate the vulnerable population that you chose in Week 1 ( Transgender) to make changes What is your primary health concern for this group and what theory might you utilize to encourage them to make behavior changes?
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported ...
disease.docx
- Addison's disease is caused by a lack of cortisol and aldosterone hormones produced by the adrenal glands.
- Common presenting symptoms include fatigue, weight loss, low blood pressure, and darkening of the skin.
- The disease is routinely diagnosed through blood tests measuring cortisol and aldosterone levels and confirmed with specialized medical imaging tests.
- Standard treatment involves corticosteroid hormone replacement therapy through medications like hydrocortisone to manage symptoms.
Essay 4 Speculating about Causes Quality Criteria NoL.docx
Essay 4: Speculating about Causes
Quality Criteria No/Limited Proficiency
(1)
Minimal Proficiency (2) Proficiency (3) High Proficiency (4)
A focused, well-
defined
phenomenon and
thesis
Phenomenon is not
explained. Thesis is
missing.
Reader cannot
determine
phenomenon/thesis and
purpose or thesis has no
relation to the writing
task.
Phenomenon is not well-
developed.
Phenomenon/Thesis and
topic are somewhat
vague or only loosely
related to the writing
task.
Phenomenon is
competently developed,
but still has some
weaknesses.
Phenomenon/Thesis and
purpose are fairly clear
and match the writing
task.
Substantially, logically, and
concretely defined
phenomenon. Details are
germane, original, and
convincingly interpreted.
Phenomenon/Thesis is clear
and specific. Develops fresh
insight.
Well-argued causes Offers simplistic,
undeveloped, or cryptic
causes. Inappropriate or
off topic generalizations.
Causes are irrelevant to
thesis. There are faulty
assumptions and errors
of fact.
Offers a cause(s) that are
too underdeveloped.
Details are too general,
not interpreted, or
inappropriately
repetitive.
Offers a solid cause(s).
Assumptions are not
always recognized or
made explicit. Contains
mostly appropriate details
or examples.
Develops fresh insight.
Substantial, logical, and
concrete development of
causes. Details are
germane, original, and
convincingly interpreted.
An effective
response to
objections
Fails to include a
response to readers’
objections.
Responses to readers’
objections are
underdeveloped or
vague. Perhaps only
offers an objection but
no response to that
objection.
Offers solid objections and
responses to objections.
Contains mostly
appropriate responses but
some might not be
germane or original.
Effectively anticipates and
appropriately responds to
readers' likely objections in
a detailed manner.
A clear, logical
organization
Unclear organization. No
or very few transitions.
No or very few topic
sentences. Paragraphs
aren’t focused. Flow
between topics and
paragraphs is confusing.
Some signs of logical
organization. May have
abrupt or illogical shifts
and ineffective flow or
ideas. Weak topic
sentences. Paragraph
structure could be
improved.
Organization supports
thesis and purpose.
Transitions are mostly
appropriate. But sequence
of ideas or paragraph
structure could still be
improved.
Fully and imaginatively
supports thesis and
purpose. Sequence of ideas
is effective. Transitions,
topic sentences, and
paragraph structure are
effective.
Use of sources/APA
format and English
grammar and
vocabulary
Neglects important
sources. Uses 0 sources.
Possibly uses source
material without
acknowledgement. Does
not demonstrate
proficiency in English
grammar, vocabulary,
and sentence structure.
No or little
understanding of APA.
Uses a somewhat
relevant source.
Quotations and
parap ...
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
Writing Assignment 2 Listening Styles Fall 2019Part I Discuss .docx
Writing Assignment 2: Listening Styles Fall 2019
Part I: Discuss the importance of listening in interpersonal relationships. Define the word “Listening”. It might be beneficial to pick a specific relationship (i.e. parent/coworker/significant other/child/friend/teacher). Give a story on how listening is important to that specific relationship.
Part II: Take time to read each of the following statements (in the chart below). Score each of the statements on a scale from 1-7
Strong Disagree – 1 Disagree – 2 Somewhat Disagree – 3 Unsure – 4 Somewhat Agree – 5 Agree – 6 Strong Agree – 7
Analyze your results. Tell me which category you are best at and why. Tell me what you are worst at and why you think you are bad at it. NOTE: I do not need to see your results. Do NOT post the chart!Part III: On pages 210-212 in the book you will see The Challenges of Listening. Choose one of the barriers discussed. For example “information overload” or “defensive listening” or “ambushing”. You need to first DEFINE the word you are using. Second you need to EXPLAIN to me how this word applies to you and how you plan on getting better at it.
Relational Listening
When listening to others, it is important to understand the feelings of the speaker.
When listening to others, I am mainly concerned with how they are feeling.
I listen to understand the emotions and mood of the speaker.
I listen primarily to build and maintain relationships with others.
I enjoy listening to others because it allows me to connect with them.
When listening to others, I focus on understanding the feelings behind words.
Relational Listening Total Score
Analytical Listening
I wait until all the facts are presented before forming judgments and opinions.
I tend to withhold judgment about another’s ideas until I have heard everything they have to say.
When listening to others, I attempt to withhold making an opinion until I’ve heard their entire message.
When listening to others, I consider all sides of the issue before responding.
I fully listen to what a person has to say before forming any opinions.
To be fair to others, I fully listen to what they have to say before making judgments.
Analytical Listening Total Score
Task-Oriented (Transactional) Listening
I am impatient with people who ramble on during conversations.
I get frustrated when people get off topic during a conversation.
When listening to others, I become impatient when they appear to be wasting time.
I prefer speakers who quickly get to the point.
I find it difficult to listen to people who take too long to get their ideas across.
When listening to others, I appreciate speakers who give brief, to the-point presentations.
Transactional Listening Total Score
Critical Listening
When listening to others, I focus on any inconsistencies and/or errors in what’s being said. ...
Similar to Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a r.docx (20)
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)Du.docx
ALTERNATIVE PROJECT(In place of Baby Project – 100 points)Du.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Form 1009WWritten Communication AssessmentIntroduction.docx
Form 1009WWritten Communication AssessmentIntroduction.docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Excellent Satisfactory Basic MINIMUM WORD COUNT A mini.docx
Excellent Satisfactory Basic MINIMUM WORD COUNT A mini.docx
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Argumentative Research.docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Argumentative Research.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
Essay 4 Speculating about Causes Quality Criteria NoL.docx
Essay 4 Speculating about Causes Quality Criteria NoL.docx
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Writing Assignment 2 Listening Styles Fall 2019Part I Discuss .docx
Writing Assignment 2 Listening Styles Fall 2019Part I Discuss .docx
More from AbramMartino96
Homework assignmentPlease annotate one artwork you like from this.docx
Homework assignment:
Please annotate one artwork you like from this week’s textbook
reading or Smarthistory. Whenever I am writing for research
presentation or publication, this is how I begin. The point is to make
sure you’re not missing anything in terms of basic data or
interpretive frameworks. When I take notes on a lecture at a
conference, this is the way I like to organize my notes, as well.
Format
Identify the artwork
Identify Period Style
Identify Subject Matter
Discuss Historical Context
Discuss Visual Elements (Line, Color, Texture, Composition etc.)
Discuss Its Place in Ideas or Culture of the Time
.
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense an.docx
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense and Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA), which are missions executed by the Department of Defense (DOD), most specifically by the Combatant Command, United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). In supporting the nation when requested by DHS, FEMA, or other lead federal agencies, or as directed by the president or the secretary of defense, DOD provides many unique capabilities for crisis response. One specific function used most notably during the post-Hurricane Katrina period was the use of airborne assets to provide damage assessments and to gauge the extent of the sea surge at various times during the recovery.
The function of deploying such assets is traditionally called
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
(ISR). Yet the U.S. military cannot legally collect intelligence on U.S. citizens. Consequently, the action, as performed during the hurricane recovery operations described here, is known as
incident awareness and assessments
(IAA). For some, the difference between these terms is merely semantics; for many, IAA differs both symbolically and practically from ISR, if not in how information is collected, then in how it is used and the motivation behind the collection. (The Web site for IAA reference is under Web sites references below.)
Assignment Guidelines
Address the following in 5–7 paragraphs:
Do you believe the distinction between ISR and IAA lies simply with terminology (and therefore there is little or no difference) or that there is a separation between the concepts? Explain and defend your answer fully. You may choose to research the topic more fully.
Contemplating the ethics of using IAA in the homeland, list at least 3 benefits of its use where ethics might potentially be secondary.
List at least 2–3 costs or opposing views to its use and how IAA—or the information gathered—might be misused or abused.
What if criminal activity (like acres of tended marijuana) was observed during IAA missions intended to conduct damage assessments? How should such information be handled?
Do you believe converting the term
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
to
incident awareness and assessments
for operations conducted in the homeland was wise or frivolous (or described otherwise)? Explain and defend your answer fully.
What is the value of using carefully selected terminology for operations in the homeland?
How does the symbolism of IAA potentially aid homeland security professionals in performing their jobs?
How does the symbolism of ISR potentially hinder homeland security professionals in performing their jobs?
Among the Web sites listed for this unit, you will find the Air Forces North (AFNORTH) Incident Awareness and Assessment Handbook, June 2010.
Why do you think this manual on IAA is available from open-source sites?
Do you think there might be ethical considerations to publicizing the use and purposes of IAA? Name and discuss at least 1.
Homecoming is an annual tradition in the United States. In this repo.docx
Homecoming is an annual tradition in the United States. In this report you are going to provide a background information about Homecoming (for example, what is homecoming, what type of activities do people do, why it is celebrated in the U.S….) You must report your findings in an essay format (at least two long paragraphs) and cite any resources that you use.
.
HomerAssignmentIIReadthreeofthebooksfromTheOdyss.docx
Homer
Assignment
II
Read
three
of
the
books
from
The
Odyssey
including
Book
I.
Choose
one
character
and
trace
that
character’s
traits
throughout
your
reading
assignment.
Write
a
five-‐paragraph
character
analysis-‐interesting
insights
about
the
character-‐of
the
character
of
your
choice.
Choose
from
the
books
listed
below:
Book
I:
You
MUST
read
Book
I.
Invocation
and
part
summary
–council
of
the
gods-‐
Athena
visits
Telemachos
in
Ithaka
and
urges
him
to
go
in
search
of
his
father-‐the
suitors
feast
in
the
house
of
Telemachos.
Book
VIII:
Odysseus
at
the
games
of
the
Phaiakians-‐
he
is
asked
top
tell
his
name
and
his
story.
Book
XIII:
Return
of
Odysseus
to
Ithaka-‐
hi
is
landed,
alone-‐
strange
return
of
the
Phaiakian
ship-‐Athena
comes
to
Odysseus
and
advises
him.
Book
XVI:
Telemachos
visits
Eumaios-‐Odyssues
reveals
himself
to
Telemachos-‐Penelope
and
suitors
learn
that
Telemachos
has
returned-‐
night
at
the
house
of
Eumaios.
Book
XXI:
The
test
of
the
bow-‐the
suitors
fail-‐Odysseus
succeeds.
Book
XXII:
The
killing
of
the
suitors-‐punishment
of
the
faithless
maids
and
thrall.
Book
XXIII:
Recognition
of
Odysseus
by
Penelope-‐reunion-‐Odysseus
goes
to
Laertes’
farm.
.
Homelessness in America has been a problem since the settlement of t.docx
Homelessness in America has been a problem since the settlement of the country.
How has society’s response to that population changed over time? Consider the following in your response: Cite references. Min 200 words
·
How has society’s response to that group changed over the past 300 years?
·
How has it changed in your lifetime?
·
What changes do you anticipate in society’s response in the next 50 years?
·
What factors have influenced those changes?
.
Homework Assignments One pagewhat the functional currency .docx
Homework Assignments One page
what the functional currency for Johnson& Johnson
Research your JOHNSON&JOHNSON and report on any major issue(s) of international taxation that is (are) addressed in this chapter.
Post this assignment in the chapter conference.
Discuss how your JOHNSON&JOHNSON handles transfer pricing.
Topics of discussion can include but are not limited to:
Are transfers from a subsidiary to its parent (upstream)? From the parent to a subsidiary (downstream)?
Or from one subsidiary to another of the same parent?
Transfer pricing methods?
What are the objectives of your JOHNSON&JOHNSONs transfer pricing practices?
What law(s) govern your JOHNSON&JOHNSONs practices?
What method is used?
The enforcement of transfer pricing regulations in the country where you JOHNSON&JOHNSON is located?
.
Homework Assignment Company Research This assignment req.docx
Homework Assignment: Company Research
This assignment requires you to research a company which is (
The Union Pacific Railroad
)
. You are to assume that you will be interviewing with this company for a job right after graduation. As such, you want to perform in-depth research about your company so you will be the best prepared candidate to be interviewed. Your goal is to learn as much as you can about the company including their strengths and weaknesses. Your research should include
Marketing issues due
·
Product market (major products)
·
Geographic market (where it operates –
local, regional, national, international)
·
Competitors
·
Brands
Current issues
·
Effect of current economic recession
·
Opportunities for and threats to the company based on current and projected events
·
Strengths and Weaknesses
·
Career opportunities
Financial issues
·
Trend analysis (e.g. trends in income, stock price, dividends)
·
Financial stability
Management issues
·
Core competency
·
Innovation (evidence that the company is or is not innovative)
·
Ethics and social responsibility (evidence of the company’s values and how those values have been reflected in its conduct)
·
Sustainability
Overview of the company
·
History
·
Mission
·
Vision
·
Organizational Structure
·
Primary industry(ies) in which it operates
Written Summary and Reference List
·
A five to eight page well organized executive summary of your company as well as a list of the references used. The reference list should be formatted according to APA style. Additionally, your team must provide evidence of “collaborative effort”, (Meeting Agendas, Minutes, etc.)
.
Homework Assignment #1Directions Please answer each of the foll.docx
Homework Assignment #1
Directions: Please answer each of the following questions in as detailed a manner as possible, and be sure to include all appropriate material discussed in the lectures and the assigned reading material.
1) Define what we mean by money and how it is used in the day to day functioning of the U.S. economy. Be sure to include the major components that make up what is defined as money and which of these components is used most widely to identify what money is. Also, include the major functions that money serves as a part of the overall economy and how banks act to create and maintain money.
2) Name and discuss the four major theories that address the term structure of interest rates. In your discussion, indicate the strengths and weaknesses of each of the theories and which theory or theories appear to be the most well accepted as explanations of term structure.
3) Explain the role that money plays under the Classical Macroeconomic Model. As a part of your discussion, include the impact the Quantity Theory of Money and Say’s Law have on this model and state in algebraic terms how the money supply relates to prices.
4) Compare and contrast pure discount bonds with coupon bonds and provide at least one example of such government or corporate bonds that can be bought and sold by investors. Describe the way interest rates are determined for these bonds by using the appropriate formula or formulas and explain the overall relationship between bond prices and interest rates.
.
Homework Assignment 9Due in week 10 and worth 30 pointsSuppose t.docx
Homework Assignment 9
Due in week 10 and worth 30 points
Suppose that there are two (2) candidates (i.e., Jones and Johns) in the upcoming presidential election. Sara notes that she has discussed the presidential election candidates with 15 friends, and 10 said that they are voting for candidate Jones. Sara is therefore convinced that candidate Jones will win the election because Jones gets more than 50% of votes.
Answer the following questions in the space provided below:
Based on what you now know about statistical inference, is Sara’s conclusion a logical conclusion? Why or why not?
How many friend samples Sara should have in order to draw the conclusion with 95% confidence interval? Why?
How would you explain your conclusion to Sara without using any statistical jargon? Why?
.
Homework Assignment 4 Guidelines1. Write the paper in Microsoft Wo.docx
Homework Assignment 4 Guidelines
1. Write the paper in Microsoft Word or in a comparable program saved as a Word document.
2. The text should be in 12 point CG Times, Times Roman, or New Times Roman.
3. Single spacing is fine but skip a line between questions.
4. Use a spell checker!
5. Include the corresponding question before each answer in your document.
6. Use Chicago or Turabian style citations to inform me of exactly where you found the information to answer the questions. The citation formatting does not need to be perfect, but do your best. For citation guides please see http://hub.miracosta.edu/library/ResearchGuides/Chicago.pdf
7. The title of the assignment in the Bb Section Folder is a hyperlink that opens the Assignment Submission window. Click to open. Upload your file. Copy the text of your assignment into the Assignment Materials text box on the assignment upload page. Make sure the formatting is cool by previewing before you submit.
8. Submit the assignment before the deadline.
Part A) A Reaction to Racism in American Literature, Art, and Music In the latter part of the 19th century, "Realism" became the dominant feature in American literature and influenced the Progressive Era writers of the early 20th century. In the years immediately following World War I, a number of American authors of the realist school began to explore race relations. Dramatists such as Eugene O'Neill and Paul Green wrote plays based on African American themes. O'Neill's The Emperor Jones (1920) and All God's Chillun Got Wings (1924) were immensely popular. Green won the Pulitzer Prize for In Abraham's Bosom, a play performed by a predominately African American cast in a period when few African American artists were able to find work outside vaudeville or minstrel shows. At the same time, a number of African American writers came to prominence writing novels and poetry based on their experiences as African Americans. This literary movement, originally centered in Harlem, New York, became known as the "Harlem Renaissance" (1920s-1930s). It was the outgrowth of a number of factors including the Great Migration to northern cities and the growing anger over both overt and covert racism. Authors, musicians, and painters gathered in Harlem and in other large urban areas throughout the North and developed a distinctly African American cultural movement cognizant of the political, economic, and social issues of prejudice and discrimination that were part of the Black experience in America. Historians have described the Harlem Renaissance as a period in which the African American writer ". . . had achieved a degree and kind of articulation that make it possible for him to transform his feelings into a variety of literary forms. Despite his intense feelings of hate and hurt, he possessed sufficient restraint and objectivity to use his materials artistically, but no less effectively." (John Hope Franklin, From Slavery to Freedom: A History of African Americans, .
Hi we are a group doing a research and we split up the work ev.docx
Hi
we are a group doing a research and we split up the work every one took apart and my part is to do
the Value Chain Analysis only
FOR the
company in question
(
company info you will find it in the attachment
)
so
there is no need to do introduction or anything
else just go directly to the topic and start doing the Value Chain Analysis
instruction in general
1-
12 font Double space
2-
2-3 pages maximum
3-
Add appendix
4-
Reliable sources important
I will check plagiarism just in case
Specific
my part is to do the value chain analysis only again do not write introduction or any thing just start with the analysis
please do not waste my and your time
read the attachment carefully first then start do the reaserch
if you have any regards
contact me
.
hi I need research paper about any topics in Manufacturing Proc.docx
hi
I need research paper about any topics in
Manufacturing Processes
a.
To introduce students to some of the fundamentals of materials (behavior and manufacturing properties)
b.
To give students a working knowledge of production processes of casting, forming and shaping, machining and machine tools, sheet metal, and joining processes
c.
To introduce students computer integrated manufacturing, flexible manufacturing systems and other modern technologies in manufacturing
d.
To give students common aspects of manufacturing including statistical control and life expectancy of some products.
e.
Students will design a simple artifact, present case studies or designs, and write reports
.
HMIS Standards Please respond to the followingFrom the e-A.docx
"HMIS Standards"
Please respond to the following:
From the e-Activity, determine a key factor that has delayed the widespread implementation of electronic health records in health care organizations. Provide an example of the effects of each factor to support your rationale.
Determine two areas where HIPPA has influenced the development of HIMS standards. Justify your response.
.
Hi i need a paper about (Head On )German film ( Turkey part)3 to.docx
Hi
i need a paper about (Head On )German film ( Turkey part)
3 to 5 sentences each
Summary:
Time context:
Details about the film:
Thesis: explain
Characters:
Camera technique:
Light:
Music:
Situation effects:
Power struggle:
Sources: 3 academic
.
Hi i have new work can you do it, its due in 6 hours Boyd, Ga.docx
Hi
i have new work can you do it, it's due in 6 hours
Boyd,
Gayle M.,
Jan Howard,
and
Robert A. Zucker
.
Alcohol Problems among Adolescents: Current Directions in Prevention Research.
Psychology Press
, 2013.
Lowe, Geoff
,
David R. Foxcroft,
and
David Sibley
.
Adolescent Drinking and Family Life
.
Taylor & Francis, 1993
.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
Underage Drinking: A Major Public Health Challenge
. Apr. 2003. Web. 10 Oct. 2016.
Office of Juvenile Jus
tice and Delinquency Prevention.
Effects and Consequences of Underage Drinking
. Sept.
2012
. Web. 10 Oct. 2016.
I want you to chose any two of these sources and write two pergraph for each, total 4 pergraghs. Can you do it?
.
HIT Management and Implementation Please respond to the followi.docx
"HIT Management and Implementation"
Please respond to the following:
Determine a key process in the delivery of health care services that would be more efficient and effective through the application of a specific model of HIT. Support your response.
Analyze the barriers to the implementation of HIMS in a complex adaptive system (CAS). Propose a strategy to help reduce the level of resistance from the clinical staff during a transition from CAS to HIMS innovations. Provide a rationale to support your response
"Innovationin HIMS"
Please respond to the following:
•Compare and contrast the functionality and efficiency of the complaint-push model and data-pull model within the process of health care service delivery. Recommend a strategy improving the effectiveness of each method for delivering patient care.
•Determine a significant aspect of a complex health care system that represents barriers to a more rapid diffusion of HIT. Next, suggest how these barriers can be removed or minimized. Support your rationale.
.
History and TheoryConsiderthe eras, life histories.docx
History and Theory
Consider
the eras, life histories, and personalities of Freud and Rogers.
Identify
two research articles published in the last 5 years: one that investigates a psychoanalytic or Freudian construct and one that investigates a client-centered, humanistic, or Rogerian construct.
Write
a 700- to 1,050-word paper about Freud and Rogers that addresses the following:
Provide a summary of each article, highlighting the processes that contemporary psychologists use to develop the theories of Freud and Rogers.
Explain their views of human nature and their worldviews as expressed in their respective theories.
Which aspect of their theory do you think would be different if they were alive and working today?
Explain how social and cultural factors influenced the development of Freud's and Rogers' respective theories of personality.
Do
NOT
use about.com, psychology.about.com, ask.com, simplypsychology.org, AllPsych.com, SparkNotes.com, wikipedia, or other sources that are not scholarly in nature.
You
MUST
have a minimum of 2 scholarly sources as references. You may use your textbook but it does not count as one of these sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read the Case of Jim in Chapter 6
Each team member should discuss the case using the humanistic theory as a model. Then use the humanistic theory to discuss how you would use it to assess the client.
Post an initial response
to this case analysis (approximately 350 words with at least 1 scholarly source).
THE CASE OF JIM
SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL: PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY
Jim completed ratings of the concepts self, ideal self, father, and mother using the semantic differential (
Chapter 5
), a simple rating scale. Although the semantic differential is not the exact measure recommended by Rogers, its results can be related to Rogerian theory since its procedures have a phenomenological quality and assess perceptions of self and ideal self.
First, consider how Jim perceives his self. Based on the semantic differential, Jim sees himself as intelligent, friendly, sincere, kind, and basically good—as a wise person who is humane and interested in people. At the same time, other ratings suggest that he does not feel free to be expressive and uninhibited. Thus, he rates himself as reserved, introverted, inhibited, tense, moral, and conforming. There is a curious mixture of perceptions: being involved, deep, sensitive, and kind while also being competitive, selfish, and disapproving. There is also the interesting combination of perceiving himself as being good and masculine but simultaneously weak and insecure. One gets the impression of an individual who would like to believe that he is basically good and capable of.
History of an argument Are there too many people There h.docx
History of an argument: Are there too many people?
There have been several points in history at which someone has argued that we have too many people, and that this will be a problem.
Please do some research and choose at least one of these arguments to discuss in some detail in a paper of about 2-3 pages.
Who was making the argument?
Which people were identified as being too many?
Was a solution proposed, and if so, what was it?
Did the predicted overpopulation crisis come to pass, and why or why not?
How many people would be about right?
How many are too many?
Who decides?
What are the criteria for the decision?
The usual formatting and proper mechanics of good writing apply.
.
history essays- 1000 words each essay- mla and 2 works cited. every .docx
history essays- 1000 words each essay- mla and 2 works cited. every question should be submitted in its own sheet.
1.Trace the patterns of international migration since 1970, with reference to at least two examples. How do these differ from migration patterns of a century earlier?
2.
Discuss advantages and disadvantages of globalization in contemporary world. Who has benefited and who has not? Has globalization brought the world together or driven it further apart?
.
Historical Background of Housing PolicyHousing is one of the requi.docx
Historical Background of Housing Policy
Housing is one of the requirements in human life
(not true!)
. Therefore,
it
greatly influences the day to day life of citizens in a country as well as the country's economy. As a result of
its
importance, there
should be
secure policies in the state that protect citizens against exploitation and the economy of the nation
This is not a neutral statement of the evidence
(Turis, 2011).
Good
housing provided with essential social amenities means healthy lives for the citizens since
they will be enjoying all the services
. Poor housing, for instance, can result in health issues for the individuals of a given society. Crime rates are also found to be higher in places with inadequate housing and this
becomes a threat
may be a threat
to the security of the community.
The housing policy
,
??????
therefore, was formed
so as to
address the housing challenges facing the nation and its citizens (Turis, 2011).
indent
To deal with the housing problems
(what housing problems?)
the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program
(The correct name is Section 8 of the Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. § 1437f)
was established in 1974 as the Housing Act (Turis, 2011). This housing policy enables low income earners
to pay for houses of their choice
in the private market. The state funds the program and as a result, it benefits over five million low-income families as it enables them to pay for the housing
with ease
. Provision of
the
vouchers is one of the
policies
ways
in which
the state addresses the housing problem for its citizens (Turis, 2011). Compared to other policies
such as….
, vouchers provide a wider range of shelter and they are less expensive. For the low-income earners to use the vouchers, the kind of houses they find
should not
exceed the maximum allowable rent by the vouchers and must be in line with the program policies. The program also
covers a wide variety of houses
which include single family home; this was aimed at small families. Apartments and houses in towns are also covered by the program.
This description of the HCV is not clear.
indent
The housing voucher programs is managed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (Kotz, 2012)
.
Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) are
the ones
responsible for carrying out the local programs outlines
(Kotz, 2012)
.
The mode of operation of this program is that an individual finds a suitable house for them to live and they pay rent to the landlords. The subsidy for the rent is paid by the PHAs to the owners of the house directly, and the person receiving such voucher will have to pay the remaining amount of money to the landlord (Kotz, 2012)
.
Therefore, in this program, the kind of benefits the citizens receive is subsidies on the rent they pay to the owners. A Certain amount is paid by the PHAs on the behalf of the low-income families, which makes houses relatively cheaper for citizens to choose where they want to li.
More from AbramMartino96 (20)
Homework assignmentPlease annotate one artwork you like from this.docx
Homework assignmentPlease annotate one artwork you like from this.docx
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense an.docx
Homeland Security efforts are ably reinforced by Homeland Defense an.docx
Homecoming is an annual tradition in the United States. In this repo.docx
Homecoming is an annual tradition in the United States. In this repo.docx
HomerAssignmentIIReadthreeofthebooksfromTheOdyss.docx
HomerAssignmentIIReadthreeofthebooksfromTheOdyss.docx
Homelessness in America has been a problem since the settlement of t.docx
Homelessness in America has been a problem since the settlement of t.docx
Homework Assignments One pagewhat the functional currency .docx
Homework Assignments One pagewhat the functional currency .docx
Homework Assignment Company Research This assignment req.docx
Homework Assignment Company Research This assignment req.docx
Homework Assignment #1Directions Please answer each of the foll.docx
Homework Assignment #1Directions Please answer each of the foll.docx
Homework Assignment 9Due in week 10 and worth 30 pointsSuppose t.docx
Homework Assignment 9Due in week 10 and worth 30 pointsSuppose t.docx
Homework Assignment 4 Guidelines1. Write the paper in Microsoft Wo.docx
Homework Assignment 4 Guidelines1. Write the paper in Microsoft Wo.docx
Hi we are a group doing a research and we split up the work ev.docx
Hi we are a group doing a research and we split up the work ev.docx
hi I need research paper about any topics in Manufacturing Proc.docx
hi I need research paper about any topics in Manufacturing Proc.docx
HMIS Standards Please respond to the followingFrom the e-A.docx
HMIS Standards Please respond to the followingFrom the e-A.docx
Hi i need a paper about (Head On )German film ( Turkey part)3 to.docx
Hi i need a paper about (Head On )German film ( Turkey part)3 to.docx
Hi i have new work can you do it, its due in 6 hours Boyd, Ga.docx
Hi i have new work can you do it, its due in 6 hours Boyd, Ga.docx
HIT Management and Implementation Please respond to the followi.docx
HIT Management and Implementation Please respond to the followi.docx
History and TheoryConsiderthe eras, life histories.docx
History and TheoryConsiderthe eras, life histories.docx
History of an argument Are there too many people There h.docx
History of an argument Are there too many people There h.docx
history essays- 1000 words each essay- mla and 2 works cited. every .docx
history essays- 1000 words each essay- mla and 2 works cited. every .docx
Historical Background of Housing PolicyHousing is one of the requi.docx
Historical Background of Housing PolicyHousing is one of the requi.docx
Recently uploaded
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as discipline
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneBeyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Recently uploaded (20)
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a r.docx
- 1. Here is the assignment. This essay needs to be 4 full pages with a reverence page if that works for you. Imagine that you have been sent to the newly discovered planet of Utaboopia that is inhabited by a population of humans. After learning how to communicate with them you find that they do not have any type of taboo language within their culture. Write a scientific article for the Utaboopians explaining what taboo language is, how it functions, and why it exists in Earth culture. Hypothesize about why Utaboopians lack taboo language and what it means for their culture; propose future research to test your hypothesis. Exam Rubric Exam Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts Identifies & Explains Issues view longer description Clearly identifies main problem and successfully explains it for intended audience 3.0 pts Identifies main problem and attempts to explain it 2.0 pts Identifies main problem but does not explain it sufficiently 1.0 pts Does not identify main problem 0.0 pts 3.0 pts Proposes Credible
- 2. Solution view longer description Offers a credible solution and persuasively argues for it 5.0 pts Offers a plausible solution and attempts to argue for it 4.0 pts Offers a plausible solution 3.0 pts Offers a partial solution (i.e. only addresses part of the prompt) 2.0 pts Offers a vague or implausible solution 1.0 pts Does not offer a solution 0.0 pts 5.0
- 3. pts Applying Terminology Correctly uses all appropriate terminology introduced in class so far 4.0 pts Correctly uses some appropriate terminology introduced in class so far 3.0 pts Uses terminology introduced in class so far, but makes some mistakes in usage 2.0 pts Insufficiently uses terminology introduced in class so far or misuses terminology from class 1.0 pts Does not use terminology introduced in class so far 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Explaining Terminology view longer description
- 4. Clearly explains all appropriate terminology for intended audience. 4.0 pts Attempts to explain all appropriate terminology. 3.0 pts Attempts to explain some appropriate terminology 2.0 pts Incorrectly explains terminology 1.0 pts Neglects to use and/or to explain appropriate terminology 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Applying Concepts, Theories, and Approaches Applies all relevant concepts, theories, and approaches discussed so far in course materials 4.0 pts Applies some relevant concepts, theories, or approaches discussed so far in course materials
- 5. 3.0 pts Applies concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials but makes some mistakes in application 2.0 pts Insufficiently applies or misuses concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials 1.0 pts Does not apply concepts, theories, or approaches discussed in course materials 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Examples view longer description Offers plentiful illustrative examples both novel and from course materials or other sources 4.0 pts Offers illustrative examples, mostly from course materials 3.0 pts
- 6. Offers some illustrative examples 2.0 pts Offers few illustrative examples 1.0 pts Does not offer illustrative examples 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Evidence view longer description Offers sufficient credible evidence both from course materials and other credible sources 4.0 pts Offers sufficient credible evidence, mostly from course materials 3.0 pts Offers some credible evidence from course materials 2.0 pts Offers some credible evidence but neglects course materials
- 7. 1.0 pts Does not offer credible evidence 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Conclusions from Evidence view longer description Draws conclusions from evidence and justifies conclusions 3.0 pts Draws conclusions from evidence but insufficiently justifies conclusions 2.0 pts Draws conclusions from evidence but does not justify conclusions or insufficiently draws conclusions from evidence 1.0 pts Does not draw conclusions from evidence 0.0 pts 3.0 pts
- 8. Explaining Concepts Theories and Approaches view longer description Clearly explains all concepts, theories and approaches discussed so far in course materials for intended audience 4.0 pts Attempts to explain all concepts, theories, and approaches discussed so far in course materials 3.0 pts Attempts to explain some concepts, theories and approaches discussed so far in course materials 2.0 pts Incorrectly explains concepts, theories and approaches discussed so far in course materials 1.0 pts Does not explain concepts, theories, or approaches discussed so far in course materials 0.0 pts 4.0 pts Credible Sources
- 9. view longer description Uses several credible sources, including course materials 3.0 pts Uses course materials 2.0 pts Relies too heavily on non-credible sources and/or neglects course materials 1.0 pts Does not use sources 0.0 pts 3.0 pts Identifying Sources view longer description Cites and gives full references for every source used 3.0 pts Cites every source, but does so inadequately 2.0 pts Does not cite every source
- 10. 1.0 pts Does not cite sources or does not use sources 0.0 pts 3.0 pts Notation view longer description Correctly applies italics, single quotes, and double quotes to indicate where words or passages are mentioned, not used 4.0 pts Applies (with some minor mistakes or omissions) italics, single quotes, and double quotes to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used 3.5 pts Correctly applies two of the three notations (italics, single quotes, and double quotes) to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, but does not use or makes mistakes with the third notation type 3.0 pts Applies (with some minor mistakes or omissions) two of the
- 11. three notations (italics, single quotes, and double quotes) to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, but does not use or makes mistakes with the third notation type 2.5 pts Correctly applies one of the three notations (italics, single quotes, and double quotes) to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, but does not use or makes mistakes with the other two notation types 2.0 pts Applies (with some minor mistakes or omissions) one of the three notations (italics, single quotes, and double quotes) to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, but does not use or makes mistakes with the other two notation types 1.5 pts Attempts to indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, but does so incorrectly 1.0 pts Does not indicate where words or passages are mentioned not used, or does not include examples 0.0
- 12. pts 4.0 pts