Evento organizado pelo IEA polo Ribeirão Preto - USP.
Tema: Queimadas na Amazônia e seus efeitos no ecossistema e na saúde da população
Palestra do Prof. Dr. Paulo Artaxo Netto
Realizada em 26/08/2011
Climate change as a driver of volcano lateral collapse. Presented by Bill McGuire at the "Perth II: Global Change and the World's Mountains" conference in Perth, Scotland in September 2010.
Evento organizado pelo IEA polo Ribeirão Preto - USP.
Tema: Queimadas na Amazônia e seus efeitos no ecossistema e na saúde da população
Palestra do Prof. Dr. Paulo Artaxo Netto
Realizada em 26/08/2011
Climate change as a driver of volcano lateral collapse. Presented by Bill McGuire at the "Perth II: Global Change and the World's Mountains" conference in Perth, Scotland in September 2010.
Unconventional Gas and Hydraulic Fracturingfnfnlands
This presentation was made by Hydrogeologist Gilles Wendling at Keepers of the Water VI in Fort Nelson, BC. This event was hosted by Fort Nelson First Nation.
Unconventional Gas and Hydraulic Fracturingfnfnlands
This presentation was made by Hydrogeologist Gilles Wendling at Keepers of the Water VI in Fort Nelson, BC. This event was hosted by Fort Nelson First Nation.
Modifying River-Floodplain Systems: A Historical and Ecological PerspectiveNoam Ross
This presentation made 9/14 at the UC Davis REACH IGERT Floodplains workshop, by Jaime Ashander, Kelly Gravuer, Megan Kelso, Mary E. Mendoza, Noam Ross
Kane Aldridge presents a seminar from the second Water Wednesday entitled "Future options for the Lower Lakes." Kane Aldridge is a postdoctoral fellow with Water Research Centre with The Environment Institute at The University of Adelaide.
Understanding Who is AT RISK - Flood extent modellingAlex Nwoko
Understanding Flood Risk Using Surface Flood Extent Modelling. This study used ArcMap and HECRAS to evaluate flood risk exposure of River Wansbeck in Morpeth, UK.
Mekong ARCC Climate Change and Hydrology Modeling Methods and ResultsMekong ARCC
At the Interim Results Workshop, the Modeling Team presented the climate change and hydrological modeling results for the LMB. The modeling team consists of Mr. Tarek Ketelsen, Mr. Jorma Koponen, Mr. Jeremy Carew-Reid, Mr. Simon Tilleard, Mr. Mai Ky Vinh, and Mr. To Quang Toan.
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Closing remarks for the forum by Dr Kim Geheb, Mekong Basin Leader, CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
Session 20 comparing the nexus along the mekong gangaCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 20: Is the Nexus Secure … and for Whom?: Unpacking Nexus Discourses on Food, Water, and Energy Security in South and Southeast Asia
Sustainability tools in hydropower development & operationsCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
Efforts to apply to rsat in mekong tributary sub basins under the mrc-ish pro...CPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
Advancing sustainability in the mekong region role of assessment tools and st...CPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. Presentation from Session 19: Advancing Sustainability in the Mekong Region: the role of Assessment Tools, Standards and Safeguards.
2. Assessing Mekong dam impacts
• Reservoir storage in Mekong basin
expected to increase by an order of
magnitude from 2010-2022
• Significant debate about the
implications of additional storage
on river flows and the implications
for peoples’ livelihoods and well-
being
3. Tradeoffs
Key
Objective
Optimise
Variables
Overall Benefit
Decisions
Constraints
Impacts
•Livelihoods
•Health
•Biodiversity
Irrigated Domestic Floodplain Recession Floodplain
Fisheries
Agriculture Water Supply Hydropower Industry products Agriculture Grazing
Legislation
• local/national laws Dam operation Development drive
options • political imperatives
• international obligations
Water availability Social/economic Desired ecosystem
• hydrological regime Engineering condition
• reservoir storage conditions • present/future condition
• outlet structures • livelihoods adaptation to
dams
4. Nam Ngum 1 Dam, Lao PDR
First large hydropower dam in Lao PDR Nam Ngum
(1972), now at 155 MW Nam Song
Nam
Song Ban Na
Largest tributary reservoir in Mekong Div. Luang Stn.
(7 km3 active storage, 404 km2 area)
Nam
Ban Lik
Increased dry season flows provide Hinheup
Stn.
downstream irrigation opportunities
Nam Nam Leuk
Ngum 1
Diversions from Nam Song and Nam Res.
Leuk, two adjacent watersheds Nam Mang
Tha Ngon Nam Ngum
New dams upstream of NN1 reduce
seasonal water level fluctuations Mekong
pre-2010 schematic diagram
5. Nam Ngum Flow Distribution
10000
Estimated inflow Releases
Discharge (m3/s)
1000
100
10
1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
Flood frequency at NN1 (1987-2005) Flood frequency with dam
7000 3500
3000 1987-2005
6000
Discharge (m3/s)
1996-2005
Discharge (m3/s)
5000 2500
4000 2000
3000 1500
2000 1000
1000 500
0 0
1 10 100 2 5 10 20 50
Return Period (yrs) Return Interval
6. BELOW NN1 DAM NN1 + BAN HINHEUP THA NGON STN.
30 30 30
Dry season Wet season Dry season Wet season Dry season Wet season
25 25 25
W
/ 20 20 20
Flow (billion m3)
O 15 15 15
10
D 10 10
A 5 5 5
M
0 0 0
30 30 30
W Dry season Wet season Dry season Wet season Dry season Wet Season
25 25 25
I
T 20 20
Flow (billion m3)
20
H
15 15 15
D 10 10 10
A
5 5 5
M
0 0 0
7. Nam Theun-Hinboun Project, Lao PDR
Nam Kading
• Commissioned in 1998 Nam Kading
THPC
Dam Outflow
• Dam with live storage less than one Nam
Hinboun
day of the mean annual flow Headpond
impounds water from Nam Theun Inflow
• Water diverted to 220-MW
powerhouse in Nam Hinboun basin Mekong
Nam
Gnouang
through tunnel at up to 110 m3/s Res.
during study period
Nam
Theun 2
• Now 440 MW, 220 m3/s with Xe Bang Fai
expansion of THPC project
• Nam Theun 2 Reservoir filled in Nam Theun
2008
8. Nam Kading Flow Distribution
100,000
Inflow with u/s stations Outflow to Nam Kading Minimum release requirement
10,000
1,000
Discharge (m3/s)
100
10
1
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average dry season flow (Dec-May)
200
Estimated inflow
Discharge (m3/s)
150
Outflow to Nam Kading
100
50
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Hydrologic Year (Jun-May)
9. Effects of Diversions on Nam Hinboun basin
1000 Nam Hinboun discharge
CS16 CS10 Maximum THPC discharge
800
Discharge (m3/s)
600
400
200
0
2008 2009 2010 2011
120 Sample time series of dry season releases
100
Discharge (m3/s)
80
60
40
Powerhouse
releases
20
0
5-Apr-09 6-Apr-09 7-Apr-09 8-Apr-09 9-Apr-09 10-Apr-09 11-Apr-09 12-Apr-09
10. Conclusions
Dams significantly alter the downstream flow
regime (and other fluxes, nutrients and
sediment), which in turn has ecological
impacts
The response of ecosystems is varied and
complex and currently difficult to predict
Changes in ecosystems affect livelihoods and
well-being of people living downstream
Changes in flow provide both constraints and
opportunities for those living downstream
The environmental and social impacts the
new dams in the Mekong will have
consequences for many decades
Script:2006 = second to last year for which MRC has discharge data. More recent data may be available from national government agencies or private hydropower companies (as is the case w/ Nam Theun). Other notes: The other dams with C:I > 0.01 are Nam Leuk, Nam Mang and Yali Falls. Annual inflow is based on MRC estimates, which may or may not be reliable. For instance, NN1 is 427 m3/s, way too high.
Can get rid of this slide or move it.
The new slide for Nam Ngum seasonal flow distribution effects. Can you mention that this slide shows the June-May hydrologic year with the wet season comprising the period from June to November and the dry season running from December to May? Perhaps, you could use the terms flood and low-flow season instead. It seems like the FDC model does not predict the wet season-dry season distribution at ThaNgon well.
Notes:NT2 will change flow in Mekong by 3%, map missing Nam Gnouang Res., which is critical for maintaining flows at
The top chart shows the effects of the dam on downstream flows in the Nam Kading. (The Nam Theun river becomes known as the Nam Kading d/s of the dam (?)). The inflows from August 2002 – December 2007 were deduced from water balance estimates that the Theun-Hinboun Power Company made from outflows, changes in water level and diversions. To model the period prior to August 2002, two approaches were tested. One of them utilized data from upstream gauging stations to estimate the inflow into the THPC impoundment using mean annual inflow scaling. Records from short-term stations were extended with the Ban Signo gauge upstream of the dam, which has a drainage area of 3,370 km^2 in comparison to the THPC dam DA of ~8,937 km^2. The main livelihood impact in the Nam Kading basin is for fishing. The basin is sparsely populated. The inflow with u/s station does a better job of predicting the recession. Hydropower diversions/production seems to have been lower during the first few years of operation. (CAN WE COMPARE THIS WITH TIME SERIES OF POWER PRODUCTION TO CHECK THAT IT WAS LOWER IN THE FIRST YEARS?)Still some data gap issues with outflow, 18,000 cms value in 2002 unlikely given other annual peak flows