With perfect key points.

1. SHRI K J POLYTECHNIC BHARUCH
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RECREATION OF MAIN BUILDING AT
SHRI K J POLYTECHNIC BY GREEN BUILDINGS NORMS
GUIDE :- V.V.SHAH
LECTURER
CIVIL DEPARTMENT
K.J.POLYTECHNIC,BHARUCH
1

2. PREPARED BY
Sr. no. NAME ENROLLMENT NO.
1 SHAH JAIMIN H. 146450306089
2 SHAH SAGAR V. 146450306090
3 SHAIKH MOHAMMED UZEFA G. 146450306091
4 SHAIKH TEHRIM BANU MO.S. 146450306092
5 SOLANKI JAYPAL N. 146450306094
2

3. CONTENTS
 Introduction
 Literature Review
 Green Building Criteria
 Study Area
 Components Of Green Building
 Materials
 Energy
 Water
 Grass Paver Blocks
 Conclusion
 Future Scope Of Work
 References 3

4. INTRODUCTION
 After air, water, food, and clothing
the next necessity of human being
is shelter.
 In today’s world the concept has
changed. With shelter the human
being needs fresh air, fresh water,
healthy food and the best
environment.
 But as pollution has increased,
recycling of conventional building
material is not possible; natural
resources are being extinct, etc.
 Hence the human being got up
with new concept GREEN
BUILDING.
4
Fig 1:- Green building

5. INTRODUCTION
 A Green building uses less energy, water and natural resource
creates less waste and is healthier for the people living inside
compared to a standard building.
 A GREEN BUILDING also called as sustainable building.
 Hence term green refers to eco-friendly practices from
building design to landscapes choices.
 In simple words less impact has a building on human health
and environment, the more green it is.
5

6. OBJECTIVES OF GREEN BUILDING
 Reduce hard paving on-site.
 Renewable energy utilization.
 Use low material in interior.
 Water reuse by grey water recycling.
 Rain water harvesting.
6

7. BENEFITS OF GREEN BUILDING
 The most tangible benefit is in reduction of operating energy
and water costs.
 Buildings consume at least 40-50% less energy and 20-30%
less water.
 30-40% reduction in operating cost.
 Eco-friendly.
 Reduction in air pollution.
 Better looks and elevation.
7

8. NECESSITY OF GREEN BUILDING
 Planning means pre thinking and pre arranging things to
achieve well result in convenience, comfort and happiness of
all living being.
 Hence here are some points regarding, why the necessity of
green building arises:-
 Increase in carbon content in atmosphere.
 Environmental pollution.
 Resulting in unhealthy conditions.
 Lack of natural resources
8

9. FEATURES OF GREEN BUILDING
 Minimum disturbances to landscapes and site condition.
 Use of recycled and environmental friendly buildings
materials.
 Use of non-toxic and recycled materials.
 Efficient use of water recycling.
 Indoor air quality improvement for human safety and comfort.
 Use of rapidly renewable materials.
 Use of buildings materials having a high recycled content.
9

10. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Performance and
Rating of
Residential
Green Building
2015 Hemant Kumar
Vaishali Sahu
• Building generate
less waste by
using less waste
management
strategies.
• Use renewable
energy on site and
utilize energy
needs.
• Used solar PV
Panel to generate
electricity and
reduces building
dependence on
grid power.
• People are mainly
focus towards
conservation &
reuse of water and
energy.
• To preserve natural
resources.
10

11. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Leader in Energy
& Environment
Design for
Building Sector
2014 Jignesh C. Salior,
Himanshu A.
Naik, Viralkumar
I. Makwana
• Used
geothermal
heating cooling
system and
uses 25-50%
less electricity.
• Used insulated
concrete forms
for the high
performance of
building.
• To provide low
E windows to
prevent the
loss of heat.
• Beneficial for
individual, society,
country and global
environment.
11

12. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Green Building
Architecture on
Designing
Techniques
2014 Kushagra Verma,
Mayank Chaurasia,
Paresenjit Shukla
Tariq Ahmed
• Reduces energy
use by 30-35%.
• Reduces CO2
emissions by 35%.
• Reduces waste
output by 70%.
• Reduces water
usages by 40%.
• Use light color
concrete for
parking area to
reduce heat
islands effect.
• Present works is
attempt in
direction to make
people community
and general public
aware about green
building
advantages.
12

13. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Low Energy Green
Materials by
Embodied Energy
Analysis
2014 Rohit Deshmukh
and Ashok More
• Used plastics and
glasses in
manufacturing of
greener
concrete.
• Used waste
materials like
construction
debris and PVC
scrap as they
perform well for
replacement for
concrete
aggregate.
• Use of fly ash in
bricks we get lower
embodied value of
our whole structure.
13

14. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Selection of
Materials for
Green
Construction
2014 Geeta Mehta,
Amit Mehta
Bidhan
Sharma
• Selected
materials that
are resource
efficient, energy
efficient, water
conservation,
improves indoor
air quality.
• Used low VOC
paints.
• Used various materials
for green construction
which fulfill maximum
energy efficiency.
14

15. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Towards the
Implementation
of the Green
Building concept
in Agricultural
Buildings
2013 M.Samer • Used bio-cement ,
eco-cement and
green concrete.
• Used green roof for
passive cooling
technique to stop
solar radiation
reaching the
building.
• To make green building
construction cost
effective agriculture
waste should be used.
• Retro fitting in old farm
buildings.
• By using agriculture
waste and bio waste as
green building material
and green building
provides sustainable
agriculture structure.
15

16. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Sustainable
Development
Green Building
2012 Odrzivi Razvoj,
Zelena
Gradnjain
• Used wood as a
building
material.
• Buildings have net zero
energy consumption
the effect of embodied
energy and green
house gas emission
become important and
found that a zero
energy house can built
up with different
materials
16

17. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
User Evaluations’
of Energy
Efficient
Buildings
2010 A L Hauge, J
Thompson T
Berker
• Energy efficient
buildings are
often rated better
than conventional
building.
• 30% of LEED rated
buildings perform
better than
expected
conventional
buildings
• Some buildings
function very well
then expected and
have positive impact
on the environment
and on the well being.
17

18. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Sustainable
Construction-An
Education and
Research
Perspective
2010 Amit
Bandyopadha
v,
Orla
LoPiccolo,
Bahar Zoghi
• Typical building
consume more of
our resources than
necessary.
• Negatively impact
the environment.
• Generate a large
amount of waste.
• 46% of construction
management
programs offer one or
two courses in
sustainable
construction.
18

19. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
Green Building
article
2010 Avinash
Shivajirao
Pawar
• To increase
efficiency of
building use high
efficiency
windows and
insulation in walls,
ceilings and floors.
• Passive solar
building design
implemented in
low energy homes.
• Solar water
heating.
• On site generation of
renewable energy
through solar power,
wind power, hydro
power or biomass.
• Building materials
should be extracted and
manufactured locally to
building sites to
minimize energy
embedded in
transportation.
19

20. LITREATURE REVIEW
PAPER YEAR AUTHOR WORK DONE OUTPUT
The Effectiveness
of the Green
Building
Evaluation and
Labeling System
2007 Vivian
W.Y.Tam
• Used indoor
environmental
indicator for
ensuring public
health.
• Used greenery
indicator to
improve
ecological
environment.
• Modifying the existing
GBELS to a scoring system
can help comparing
building in the
implementation of green
design.
20

21. WHY GREEN BUILDING?
Energy
Consumption
Water
Consumption
Ocupant
Satisfaction
CO2 Emissions
74%
54%
27%
67%
22%
46%
73%
33%
PERCENTAGE
Normal Building Green Building
REFERENCE:- LEED for building sector
21

22. NECESSITY OF ENERGY SAVING
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
2000 2005 2010
1.30% 1.60% 1.90%
4.30%
5.29%
6.28%
PERCENTAGE
YEARS
Indian Population Growth Rate
Indian Energy Consumption Growth
Rate
Reference:- LEED for building sector
22

23. GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM
 Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design.
 Developed by US Green
Building Council(USGBC).
 Launched in India in 2001.
 Green Rating for Integrated
Habitat Assessment.
 Developed by The Energy
and Resource Institute(TERI).
 Launched in India in 2008.
GRIHALEED
23

24. GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM
 Rating system:-
 CII-Sohrabji godrej green
buisness centre, Hyderabad
(Platinum rated)
 Rating system:-
 Centre for Enviornmental
Science & Engg.
IIT-Kanpur(Five star)
Points Ratings
40-49 Certified
50-59 Silver
60-79 Gold
80+ Platinum
Points Ratings
51-60 One star
61-70 Two star
71-80 Three star
81-90 Four star
91-100 Five star
24

25. GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM
SR.NO POINTS
SCORED
RATING
1 50-60 One Star
2 61-70 Two Star
3 71-80 Three Star
4 81-90 Four Star
5 91-100 Five Star
GRIHA is acronym for Green
Rating for Integrated Habitat
Assessment rating system tool
developed by TERI(The Energy
and Resource Institute).
The rating system is based
on on accepted energy and
environmental principles, and
seek to strike a balance
between the established
practices and emerging
concepts, both national and
international.
Table 1:- Rating by GRIHA
25

26. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 1 Site Selection.
 Criteria 2 Preserve and protect the landscape during
construction/ compensatory depository forestation.
 Criteria 3 Soil conservation (till post-construction).
 Criteria 4 Design to include existing site features.
 Criteria 5 Reduce hard paving on-site.
26

27. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 6 Enhance outdoor lighting system efficiency.
 Criteria 7 Plan utilities efficiently and optimize on-site
circulation efficiency.
 Criteria 8 Provide at least minimum level of sanitation/safety
facilities for construction workers.
 Criteria 9 Reduce air pollution during construction.
 Criteria 10 Reduce landscape water requirement.
27

28. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 11 Reduce buildings water use.
 Criteria 12 Efficient water use during construction.
 Criteria 13 Optimize buildings design to reduce the
conventional energy demand.
 Criteria 14 Optimize the energy performance of buildings
within special comfort limit.
 Criteria 15 Utilization of fly ash in the buildings structure.
28

29. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 16 Reduce volume, weight and time of construction
by adopting efficient technology.
 Criteria 17 Use low material in interior.
 Criteria 18 Renewable energy utilization.
 Criteria 19 Renewable energy base hot water system.
 Criteria 20 Waste water treatment.
29

30. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 21 Water recycles and reuses including rain water.
 Criteria 22 Reduction in waste during construction.
 Criteria 23 Efficient waste segregation.
 Criteria 24 Storage and disposal of waste.
 Criteria 25 Resources recovery from waste.
30

31. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 26 Use of low VOC paints, adhesives or sealants.
 Criteria 27 Minimize ozone depleting substance.
 Criteria 28 Ensure water quality.
 Criteria 29 Acceptable outdoor and indoor noise levels.
 Criteria 30 Tobacco and smoke control.
31

32. GREEN BUILDING CRITERIAS
 Criteria 31 Provide the minimum level of accessibility for
person with disabilities.
 Criteria 32 Energy audit and validation.
 Criteria 33 Buildings operation and maintenance.
32

33. STUDY AREA
33
Fig 2:- Study Area Of Main Building At Shri K J Polytechnic, Bharuch

34. STUDY AREA
 BUILDING:- Main Admin Building at Shri K J Polytechnic.
 Area:- 317m2
 Numbers of floors:- 2
 Numbers of rooms:-10
 Electricity consumption:-150amp
 Materials used: Concrete, Single layer glass,
Florescent tube light, Bricks.
34

35. COMPONENTS OF GREEN BUILDING
 Materials
 Energy
 Water
 Health components
35

36. MATERIALS
 Snow White Insulation
 Acoustics Ceiling
 Triple Layer Glasses
 Fly Ash
 Dr. Fixit Heat Shield
36

37. SNOW WHITE INSULATION
 Snow white, is an innovative
insulation which has user friendly
and eco-friendly character.
 Snow white provides perfect
solution for thermal and acoustics
insulation for all fields of
construction that is private homes;
commercial, public and light
construction.
 Serves for insulation of rooftops,
partition walls; acoustics partition
walls, peripheral walls and ceilings.
 Snow white acoustics insulation
products have a particularly high
NRC(0.70-0.90) .
37
Fig 3:- Snow White Insulation

38. FEATURES OF SNOW WHITE INSULATION
 Pleasant to touch and easy to install
 Faster installation
 Anti-Microbial
 International standard certified
 Provides complete thermal, reflective and acoustics insulation
 Eco friendly
 Does not require use of any kind of protective clothing
 Offered in size needed for a complete suitability
 Completely recyclable
 Doesn’t lose thickness or volume overtime
 Certified as Green Standard insulation
38

39. COMPARISON BETWEEN SNOW WHITE
AND GLASS WOOL
Product Snow white Glass wool
Weight(kg) 6-24 16-48
Thermal Conductivity 0.030-0.056 0.04
Noise reduction (%) 35-95 35-85
Toxic No Yes
Development of bacteria No Yes
Wire net for constructive
reinforcement
Light Strong
Safe to use Yes No
Green Standard Yes No
Maintenance to humidity Not needed Needed after 5-10 yrs
Maintenance to leak Not needed Needed
Point of melting 210o 400o
39

40. TRIPLE LAYER GLASS
 Triple glazing is 3 panes of
glass instead of 1 or 2.
 The claim is that by having an
extra pane, you will increase
efficiency and reduce noise.
 Save even more on heating
bills
 Maximum comfort
 Enhanced security
40
Fig 4:- Triple Layer Glass

41. BENEFITS OF TRIPLE LAYER GLASS
 Extra panes of glass mean lower E.
 Triple pane windows are more soundproof.
 Triple pane windows reduce condensation on glasses.
41

42. FLY ASH
 Fly ash is the finely divided
residue that results from the
combustion of pulverized coal
and is transported from the
combustion chamber by
exhaust gases.
 Over 61 million metric tons
(68 million tons) of fly ash
were produced in 2001.
42
Fig 5:- Fly Ash

43. ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
 Increasing the life of concrete roads and structures by
improving concrete durability.
 Net reduction in energy use and greenhouse gas and other
adverse air emissions when fly ash is used to replace or
displace manufactured cement.
 Reduction in amount of coal combustion products that must
be disposed in landfills.
 Conservation of other natural resources and materials.
43

44. ACOUSTICS CEILING
 A dropped ceiling is a secondary
ceiling, hung below the main
structural ceiling.
 It may also be referred as a drop
ceiling, T-bar ceiling, false ceiling,
ceiling tiles and is a staple of
modern construction and
architecture in both residential
and commercial application.
44
Fig 6:- Acoustics Ceiling

45.  DESIGN OBJECTIVES
 Aesthetics
 Acoustics
 Indoor environmental quality
 Sustainability
 ADVANTAGES
 Fire safety
 Ease of modification
45

46. Dr. FIXIT HEAT SHIELD
 Dr. Fixit Heatshield is a heat reducing
& ‘energy saving’ elastomeric coating
composed of acrylic emulsion
polymers, microspheres, properly
selected & graded inert fillers, light
fast & weather durable white
pigments, additives & water as
medium.
 It is used as a heat insulating coating
on building rooftops & exterior walls
because it helps in reducing power
consumption substantially by reducing
the load on air-conditioners & keeps
the interiors cool with additional
function of waterproofing. 46Fig 7:- Dr. Fixit Heat Shield

47. AREAS OF APPLICATION
 Terraces and rooftops of buildings - cementitious, asbestos &
metal surfaces
 Industrial & godown shades with GI or asbestos roofs
 Exterior walls of buildings
 Cold storages, computer server rooms, electrical control panel
rooms, etc.
 Metal & concrete storage tanks for water, chemicals and fuel
in petrochemical industry.
47

48. FEATURES & BENEFITS
 Heat Insulation - reduces the conductivity of heat from
exterior to interior, thus lowers the temperature.
 Solar Reflectance - 83.8% solar reflectance re-radiated heat
back to atmosphere
 UV and IR resistant - resistance to UV emission, protects
coating from damage and reduces heat conductivity.
 Microbial resistant – resistance to algae and fungus growth
results into lesser maintenance. Non-Toxic water based
system - eco friendly.
 Energy Saving - reduction in electrical consumption for air-
conditioners, saves energy cost.
48

49. METHOD OF APPLICATION
 Surface Preparation: on Cementitious Surfaces
 surface to be applied upon must be free from dust, loose
material, paint, oil, or any other material which may impair
adhesion
 Mechanical means such as wire brushing & shot blasting can
be used. Finally vacuum cleaning of all loose solids and liquids
can be done if required
 All surface cracks up to 5 mm width should be filled up with Dr.
Fixit Crack x or Dr. Fixit unfilled.
 Cracks more than 5 mm and all separation gaps should be
filled up with Dr. Fixit Pidicrete URP or Dr. Fixit unibond SBR
modified mortar or as specified.
49

50. COST CALCULATIONS
Total exterior wall area = 552m2
Price of 1 litre of dr. Fixit on 1 m2=Rs 437/-
Material cost for 552m2 =552*437= Rs 2,41,224/-
Labour cost per ft2=Rs 11(for three coats)
Labour cost for 5941.68ft2= 5941.68*11= Rs 65,400/-
Total cost = material cost+ labour cost= Rs 3,06,624/-
Durability= 2 years
Annual cost = 3,06,624/2=Rs 1,53,312/-
50

51. ENERGY
 Building consumes energy for
mainly construction, use and
maintenance.
 The design of a building
should be such that it can use
maximum available energy of
the nature and this type of
design is termed as “passive
solar design of a building.”
51
Fig 8:- Energy Design

52. SOLAR PANEL
 A panel designed to absorb the sun's
rays as a source of energy for
generating electricity or heating.
 Solar power systems derive clean,
pure energy from the sun.
Installing solar panels on your home
helps combat greenhouse gas
emissions and reduces our collective
dependence on fossil fuel and
typically ranges from 10 to 300 watts.
52
Fig 9:- Solar Panel

53. FEATURES OF SOLAR PANEL
Cell Type Poly-crystalline 156 x 156mm,
Cell Arrangement 72 (6 x 12)
Dimensions 1954 x 982 x 40mm (76.93 x 38.7 x 1.57in)
Weight 27kg
Front Cover 4mm tempered glass.
Frame Material Anodized aluminum alloy.
Types of system in solar panel
•Grid interactive with battery backup
•Off grid solar power plant
53

54. DESIGN OF SOLAR PANEL
Item Watt Numbers per
room
Total Room Total Watt
Tube Light 18 9 10 1620
Fan 60 9 10 5400
Camera 1.7 1 10 17
Motor 1 HP
(746 watt)
- - 746
Laptop 65 1 10 650
Projector 300 1 10 3000
Plug Point 100 2 10 2000
13433 Watt
54

55.  Numbers of solar panels required for building:
= Total watt/Watt of one solar panel
= 13433/200
= 67 Numbers
 Area of one solar panel = 65×39 inches
= 2535 sq. inches
= 1.635 m2
 Area of 67 panels = 1.635×67
= 109.55 m2
55

56. COST BENEFITS ANALYSIS
Electricity bill per year = Rs 1,80,000/-
Installation cost of solar panel= Rs 5,00,000/-
Maintenance cost of solar panel = Rs 2,00,000/-
Total cost of solar panel = 500000+200000
= Rs 7,00,000/20yrs
Electricity bills in 20 years = 180000*20
= Rs 3,60,0000/-
Savings in electricity bills = 3600000-700000
= Rs 2,90,0000/20yrs
Savings in electricity bills in 1 year = Rs 1,45,000/-
56

57.  Conclusions:- Energy saving by using solar panel is
about 20-25% and helps to conserve natural
resources.
57

58. WATER MANAGEMENT
 Minimising water use is achieved by installing grey water and
rainwater catchment systems that recycle water for irrigation or
toilet flushing.
 Water-efficient appliances, such as low flow showerheads, self-
closing or spray taps; low-flush toilets, or waterless composting
toilets shall be used.
 Installing point of use hot water systems and lagging pipes
saves on water heating.
 Management of water by two methods:-
• Grey water recycling
• Rain water harvesting
58

59. GREY WATER RECYCLING
 Grey water is wastewater generated from domestic activities
such as laundry, bathing and dishwashing.
 It comprises of about two-thirds of domestic water use.
 It gets its name from the cloudy appearance and from its
status as neither being fresh nor polluted.
 Grey water is easier to treat and recycle because of the low
levels of contamination.
 If the grey water is harvested on a separate plumbing, the grey
water can be recycled, stored and re-used.
59

60. PURPOSE OF GREY WATER RECYCLING
 Reduces fresh water requirement
 Reduce sewage generation
 Toilet flushing
 Floor cleaning
 Irrigation
 Gardening
 Car washing
 Construction
60

61. BENEFITS OF GREY WATER RECYCLING
 Lower fresh water extraction from rivers and lakes
 Reduce strain on septic tank or treatment plant
 Ground water recycling
 Irrigation and plant growth
 Maintain soil fertility
 Enhance water quality
61

62. COMPONENTS OF GREY WATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM
 Diversion system
 Piping system
 Filtration unit
 Delivery and storage system
 Pumping unit
62

63.  Filtration Unit
 Filtration is one of the most important operations in the
grey water purification process.
 Type of filter required for a grey water system depends
largely upon the amount of grey water to be filtered, the
type of contaminants present and end use.
 A drain filter is an easy and inexpensive way to filter lint and
hair out of bath or laundry water.
 Delivery and Storage System
 Grey water may be stored in tanks of different materials
e.g. concrete tanks, steel tanks, fibre glass tanks, plastic
tanks or site built tanks.
 After storage, the water is delivered to various units like
cistern tanks and irrigation outlets
63

64.  DIVERSION SYSTEM
 A diversion system is used to convey the grey water away
from the sewers.
 A simple plumbing device diverts grey water in the
wastewater drainage line to a junction chamber for
recycling.
 PIPING SYSTEM
 Combined wastewater is usually conveyed in 7.5 to 10 cm
of pipes in residential areas.
 Grey water carries some solids, most of the solids tend to
scrap the bottom of the pipe in bigger pipe sizes, while
small diameter pipes tend to get clogged.
64

65.  Pumping Unit
 Efficient centrifugal pumps are ideal where water
requirements are substantial and only single-phase power,
and sufficient power available.
 These are normally low cost balanced and with rigged
construction.
 It has no centrifugal switch, require less operational and
maintenance cost with no air lock problems.
65

66. DESIGN OF STORAGE TANK
Grey Water produced / day
No. of students = 300
Approximate number of times flushing the toilets = 150
Capacity of the cistern = 15 litres
Amount of grey water produced per day = 15 × 150
= 2250 l/day
Length: width ratio = 4:1
Depth of tank =1 m (assumed)
Volume of grey water produced = 2.25 /day
Volume = l × w × d
Volume =4*d
2.25 = 4 * d
L = 4 ×0.6=2.4m ≈ 3.0 m
The storage tank dimensions are 3.0m × 1m × 1m. 66

67. COST BENEFITS ANALYSIS
Installation cost of grey water recycling system= Rs 4,30000/-
Maintenance cost=Rs 1,24000/-
Durability=20 years
Maintenance cost= 124000*20
= Rs 2,480000/-
Total cost of grey water system= 430000+2480000
= Rs 2,910000/20yrs
Cost saving in 1 year = Rs 2,40000/-
Cost saving in 20 years = Rs 4,800000/-
Savings of grey water system = 4800000-2910000
= Rs 18,90000/20yrs
Cost saving per year = 1890000/20
= Rs 95,000/-
67

68.  Conclusions: Water saving by using grey water
recycling is about 30-35% & also helped to reduce
impact on sewage treatment plant. Water also used
in gardening as well as flushing
68

69. RAIN WATER HARVESTING
 Rain water harvesting is the accumulating and storing of rain
water for reuse before it reaches the aquifer.
 Rain water collected from the roofs of houses and local
institutions can make an important contribution to the
available drinking water.
 Water collected from the ground, sometimes from areas that
are especially prepared for this purpose, is called “storm water
harvesting”.
69

70. BENEFITS OF RAIN WATER HARVESTING
 Recharge of ground water table
 Increase in greenery in urban areas
 Eco-friendly
 Simple to construct from inexpensive local material
 Prevent soil erosion and flooding in urban areas
 Rejuvenates the river in nearby regions
 Availability of water for drinking, livestock, irrigation etc
70

71. DESIGN OF RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK
Annual discharge = area * total rainfall
= 663.12 * 11982 / 1000
= 7945.50 cubic meter
= 7945503.84 litre
Volume (V) of tank is 7945503.84 litre
Assume height of tank is 3 meter
V =∏/4 *d2*h
7945.50 = ∏/4*d2*3
D = 60 mm
V =π/4 *d2*h
=π/4 *602*3
= 8482 cubic meter
= 8482000 litres
Therefore 2 tanks are required. 71

72. DIAMETER OF PIPE
Rainfall intensity =75mmhr
Area of building =663.12m2
Discharge = Rainfall intensity × Area
= 76×663.1210³×3600 = 1.39*10-3
Pipe area = π÷4×d²
1.39×10–³ = π÷4×d²
D= 0.0420 = 42mm
Provide 4 nos -15 mm dia pipes.
72

73.  Conclusions:-Rain water harvesting will reduce water
bills; provide an alternative supply for drinking water
and helps in maintaining a green or healthy garden. In
fact dependable upon a tank size and climate rain
water harvesting then reduce measures use by water
use by 100%.
73

74. GRASS PAVER BLOCK
 Grass block designed to overcome
some of the difficulties associated
with the early pre-cast system.
 A level upper surface provides a safer
walking platform and a lower level of
traffic vibration than is often
associated with studded block.
 A further benefits comes from the
continuous concrete surround to
each soil pocket.
 These feature makes grass block idle
for slope protection work help into
prevent soil from being washed
down the slope. 74
Fig 10:- Grass Paver Block

75. USES OF GRASS PAVER BIOCKS
 Parking
 Garden
 Hospital
 Airport
 Restaurants
 Bus stop
 Apartment
TYPES OF PAVER BLOCK
1. Concrete paver block
2. Clay paver block
75

76. FEATURES OF GRASS PAVER BLOCK
 Fine Finish
 High Durability
 Smooth Texture
 High Safety
ADVANTAGES OF GRASS PAVER BLOCK
 Environmentally friendly
 Easy installation
 Less maintenance
 Permeable
 Durable
 Economical
 Versatile
 Reusable
76

77. CONCLUSION
 By using snow white insulation in our building it helps to reduce
noise by 35-95% and its thermal conductivity is 0.030-0.056. It
is an eco friendly material and durable.
 By using triple layer window in our building it helps to increase
energy efficiency, reduce temperature, more comfort and eco
friendly.
 Fly ash can be expansive replacement for Portland cement in
concrete also using it using it improve strength segregation and
is of pumping concrete.
 Dr Fixit helps in Heat Insulation - reduces the conductivity of
heat from exterior to interior, thus lowers the temperature as
well as Solar Reflectance - 83.8% solar reflectance re-radiated
heat back to atmosphere.
77

78. CONCLUSION
 Water saving by using grey water recycling is about 30-35% &
also helped to reduce impact on sewage treatment plant.
Water also used in gardening as well as flushing.
 Energy saving by using solar panel is about 20-25% and helps
to conserve natural resources.
 Rain water harvesting will reduce water bills; provide an
alternative supply for drinking water and helps in maintaining
a green or healthy garden. In fact dependable upon a tank size
and climate rain water harvesting then reduce measures use
by water use by 100%.
78

79. FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK
 Working model can be prepared
 3 D design can be prepared on auto-CAD
 Optimize buildings design to reduce the conventional energy
demand
 Renewable energy base hot water system
 Efficient waste segregation.
 Resources recovery from waste.
 Minimize ozone depleting substance
79

80. REFERENCES
 Hemant Kumar and Vaishali Sahu, performance and rating of
residential green building Vol 2(2) in 2015.
 Jignesh C. Salior, Himanshu A. Naik and Viralkumar I.
Makwana. Leader in energy & environment design for building
sector in 2014 Vol 10.
 Rohit Deshmukh and Ashok More, Low Energy Green Materials
by Embodied Energy Analysis Vol. 2 in 2014.
 Kushagra Verma, Mayank Chaurasia, Paresenjit Shukla and
Tariq Ahmed, Green Building Architecture on Designing
Techniques Vol 4 (2) in 2014.
 Geeta Mehta, Amit Mehta and Bidhan Sharma, selection of
material for green construction Vol 11(6) in 2014.
80

81. REFERENCES
 M. Samer, toward the implementation of green building
concept in agriculture building volume 15(2) in 2013.
 Avinash Shivajirao Pawar, green buildings review article in
2013.
 Amit bandyopdhyay, Orla LoPiccolo and Bahar Zoghi,
sustainable construction in 2013.
 Odrzivi Razvoj and Zelena Gradnja, Sustainable Development
Green Building in 2012.
 S Shriniwas , green building in India , lessons learnt , senior
councilor CII godrej GBC in 2012.
81

82. REFERENCES
 A L Hauge, J Thompson and T Berker, User Evaluations’ of
Energy Efficient Buildings in 2010.
 Vivian W.Y. Tam, the effectiveness of green building evaluation
and labeling system Vol 50(4) in 2007.
 Green buildings concept and norms from BSNL in 2012.
 Web sites
 www.greenbuilding.com
 http://greensource.construction.com/tech/010404cle
 http://www.igbc.in
 http://www.usgbc.org
 http://www.griha.in
82

83. 83