Is microbial ecology driven by roaming genes?beiko
Microbial ecology often makes assumptions about the relationship between phylogeny and function, but these assumptions can be invalidated by lateral gene transfer. We need to take a broader view of relationships between genes and genomes in order to make better sense out of microbes.
Is microbial ecology driven by roaming genes?beiko
Microbial ecology often makes assumptions about the relationship between phylogeny and function, but these assumptions can be invalidated by lateral gene transfer. We need to take a broader view of relationships between genes and genomes in order to make better sense out of microbes.
Creating a Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Marine Microbial Ecology Research...Larry Smarr
06.06.27
Invited Talk
ONR Review
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD
Title: Creating a Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Marine Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis (CAMERA)—Taking Metagenomics to Light Speed
La Jolla, CA
Jonathan Eisen talk for 2019 ADVANCE Scholar Award SymposiumJonathan Eisen
Slides for my talk at the 2019 ADVANCE Scholar Award Symposium. Talk covered a little bit about mt research and more about STEM Diversity. See https://diversity.ucdavis.edu/2019-advance-scholar-award-symposium
American Society for Microbiology NGS 2020 Aine O'TooleÁine Niamh O'Toole
200,001: A tree-space odyssey. Pandemic phylogenetics and reporting in 2020. Aine O'Toole Plenary
Pipe Dreams: Analytical Methods, Bioinformatic Tools and Pipelines
Viral Metagenomics (CABBIO 20150629 Buenos Aires)bedutilh
This is a one-hour lecture about metagenomics, focusing on discovery of viruses and unknown sequence elements. It is part of a one-day workshop about metagenome assembly of crAssphage, a bacteriophage virus found in human gut. The hands-on workflow can be found at http://tbb.bio.uu.nl/dutilh/CABBIO/ and should be doable in one afternoon with supervision. There is also an iPython notebook about this here: https://github.com/linsalrob/CrAPy
My presentation at the 2014 MetaCenter symposium in Eugene, OR entitled "High-throughput annotation of metagenomes reveals community physiological variation in the mammalian microbiome"
Targeted RNA Sequencing, Urban Metagenomics, and Astronaut GenomicsQIAGEN
Dr. Chris Mason’s presentation will cover the QIAseq Targeted RNA Panel beta testing, Qiagen’s Sample-to-Insight solution for Metagenomics sequencing as demonstrated in the Metasub project, as well as Chris latest endeavor the, “Twins Study”, which will be a comprehensive genomic study of the impact of spaceflight on the human body. Astronaut Scott Kelly will be studied during the course of his year-long stay at the ISS as will his twin brother, Mark Kelly, a former NASA astronaut who will remain on earth.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/03/27/395536140/nasa-to-study-a-twin-in-space-and-his-brother-on-earth
Clinical Metagenomics for Rapid Detection of Enteric Pathogens and Characteri...QIAGEN
High-throughput sequencing, combined with high-resolution metagenomic analysis, provides a powerful diagnostic tool for clinical management of enteric disease. Forty-five patient samples of known and unknown disease etiology and 20 samples from health individuals were subjected to next-generation sequencing. Subsequent metagenomic analysis identified all microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites) in the samples, including the expected pathogens in the samples of known etiology. Multiple pathogens were detected in the individual samples, providing evidence for polymicrobial infection. Patients were clearly differentiated from healthy individuals based on microorganism abundance and diversity. The speed, accuracy and actionable features of CosmosID bioinformatics and curated GenBook® databases, implemented in the QIAGEN Microbial Genomics Pro Suite, and the functional analysis, leveraging the QIAGEN functional metagenomics workflow, provide a powerful tool contributing to the revolution in clinical diagnostics, prophylactics and therapeutics that is now in progress globally.
Genomic aided selection for crop improvementtanvic2
In last Several years novel genetic and genomics approaches are expended. Genetics and genomics have greatly enhanced our understanding of the structural and functional aspects of plant genomes.
Creating a Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Marine Microbial Ecology Research...Larry Smarr
06.06.27
Invited Talk
ONR Review
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD
Title: Creating a Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Marine Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis (CAMERA)—Taking Metagenomics to Light Speed
La Jolla, CA
Jonathan Eisen talk for 2019 ADVANCE Scholar Award SymposiumJonathan Eisen
Slides for my talk at the 2019 ADVANCE Scholar Award Symposium. Talk covered a little bit about mt research and more about STEM Diversity. See https://diversity.ucdavis.edu/2019-advance-scholar-award-symposium
American Society for Microbiology NGS 2020 Aine O'TooleÁine Niamh O'Toole
200,001: A tree-space odyssey. Pandemic phylogenetics and reporting in 2020. Aine O'Toole Plenary
Pipe Dreams: Analytical Methods, Bioinformatic Tools and Pipelines
Viral Metagenomics (CABBIO 20150629 Buenos Aires)bedutilh
This is a one-hour lecture about metagenomics, focusing on discovery of viruses and unknown sequence elements. It is part of a one-day workshop about metagenome assembly of crAssphage, a bacteriophage virus found in human gut. The hands-on workflow can be found at http://tbb.bio.uu.nl/dutilh/CABBIO/ and should be doable in one afternoon with supervision. There is also an iPython notebook about this here: https://github.com/linsalrob/CrAPy
My presentation at the 2014 MetaCenter symposium in Eugene, OR entitled "High-throughput annotation of metagenomes reveals community physiological variation in the mammalian microbiome"
Targeted RNA Sequencing, Urban Metagenomics, and Astronaut GenomicsQIAGEN
Dr. Chris Mason’s presentation will cover the QIAseq Targeted RNA Panel beta testing, Qiagen’s Sample-to-Insight solution for Metagenomics sequencing as demonstrated in the Metasub project, as well as Chris latest endeavor the, “Twins Study”, which will be a comprehensive genomic study of the impact of spaceflight on the human body. Astronaut Scott Kelly will be studied during the course of his year-long stay at the ISS as will his twin brother, Mark Kelly, a former NASA astronaut who will remain on earth.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/03/27/395536140/nasa-to-study-a-twin-in-space-and-his-brother-on-earth
Clinical Metagenomics for Rapid Detection of Enteric Pathogens and Characteri...QIAGEN
High-throughput sequencing, combined with high-resolution metagenomic analysis, provides a powerful diagnostic tool for clinical management of enteric disease. Forty-five patient samples of known and unknown disease etiology and 20 samples from health individuals were subjected to next-generation sequencing. Subsequent metagenomic analysis identified all microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites) in the samples, including the expected pathogens in the samples of known etiology. Multiple pathogens were detected in the individual samples, providing evidence for polymicrobial infection. Patients were clearly differentiated from healthy individuals based on microorganism abundance and diversity. The speed, accuracy and actionable features of CosmosID bioinformatics and curated GenBook® databases, implemented in the QIAGEN Microbial Genomics Pro Suite, and the functional analysis, leveraging the QIAGEN functional metagenomics workflow, provide a powerful tool contributing to the revolution in clinical diagnostics, prophylactics and therapeutics that is now in progress globally.
Genomic aided selection for crop improvementtanvic2
In last Several years novel genetic and genomics approaches are expended. Genetics and genomics have greatly enhanced our understanding of the structural and functional aspects of plant genomes.
Potential for genomic selection in indigenous cattle breeds and results of GWAS in Gir dairy cattle of Gujrat by Dr.Pravin Kandhani and Dr. Vijay Trivedi KAMDHENU UNIVERSITY GANDHINAGAR
Molecular marker and its application in breed improvement and conservation.docxTrilokMandal2
Molecular markers have revolutionized the field of genetics and genomics by providing valuable tools for studying genetic diversity, identifying individuals, and characterizing traits of interest. This review paper aims to explore the applications of molecular markers in breed improvement and conservation. We discuss the various types of molecular markers commonly used, such as microsatellites, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), and many more. Additionally, we examine their applications in genetic diversity assessment, parentage analysis, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and conservation efforts. The paper highlights the importance of molecular markers in accelerating breed improvement programs and enhancing conservation strategies for maintaining genetic diversity within a population.Molecular markers have had a significant impact on breed development and conservation efforts, transforming genetics and offering vital insights into genetic diversity, lineage tracing, and genotype characterization. The importance of molecular markers in improving genetic gains, facilitating breeding programs, and preserving genetic diversity for the long-term sustainability of the animal population has been underlined in this review paper. Emerging advancements in molecular marker technology show enormous potential for improving and conserving breeds. Deeper insights into the genetic basis of complex traits will be provided through GWAS, CRISPR/Cas9, gene editing technologies, and sequencing technologies, resulting in faster genetic gains. Breeders and conservationists will be able to make more informed judgments thanks to these technologies. In conclusion, molecular markers have had a significant impact on breed conservation and enhancement. Their innovations have changed the industry and given both conservationists and breeders vital knowledge. We can pave the road for more effective and sustainable genetic improvement and the preservation of biodiversity for future generations by combining the power of molecular markers with conventional breeding and conservation techniques.
Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) is a combined tool of plant mutagenesis and DNA Biology to investigate useful mutations at Genomic level. First time used for cotton improvement.
Genome to pangenome : A doorway into crops genome explorationKiranKm11
This seminar underpins the significance and need of formulating pan-genome oriented crop improvement strategies over single reference genome based studies. Pangenome graphs uncovers large repository of genetic variation which could we useful for planning and executing strategic crop improvement programmed
Genomics platform for agriculture-CAT lectureSenthil Natesan
The popular lecture for the undergraduate students of agriculture to know about the application of biotechnology in agriculture science graduates. Some of the major break through inventions how it impact on agriculture research and development
MAGIC :Multiparent advanced generation intercross and QTL discovery Senthil Natesan
MAGIC or multiparent advanced generation inter-crosses is an experimental method that increases the precision with which genetic markers are linked to quantitative trait loci (QTL). This method was first introduced by (Mott et al., 2000) in animals as an extension of the advanced intercrossing (AIC) approach suggested by (Darvasi and Soller , 1995)for fine mapping multiple QTLs for multiple traits. Advanced Intercrossed Lines (AILs) are generated by randomly and sequentially intercrossing a population initially originating from a cross between two inbred lines.
MAGIC involves multiple parents, called founder lines, rather than bi-parental control. AILs increase the recombination events in small chromosomal regions for the purpose of fine mapping. These lines are then cycled through multiple generations of outcrossing. Each generation of random mating reduces the extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD), allowing the QTL to be mapped more accurately.
Similar to Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules (20)
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Toxic effects of heavy metals : Lead and Arsenicsanjana502982
Heavy metals are naturally occuring metallic chemical elements that have relatively high density, and are toxic at even low concentrations. All toxic metals are termed as heavy metals irrespective of their atomic mass and density, eg. arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, thallium, chromium, etc.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules
1. ‘Artificial selection on the phenotypes of domesticated species has
been practiced consciously or unconsciously for millennia, with
dramatic results. Recently, advanced in molecular genetic
engineering have promised to revolutionize agricultural practices.
There are, however, several reasons why molecular genetics can
never replace traditional methods of agricultural improvement, but
instead they should be integrated to obtain the maximum
improvement in the economic value of domesticated populations.’
Lande & Thompson (1990)
2. Martin Johnsson
The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences
Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices
and molecules
@mrtnj
3. The statistical and sequence perspectives
How they are used
Future genomic breeding
5. ‘Genomics'
‘Genome’ from German Genom, Hans Winkler 1920
The DNA of an organism
Journal title Genomics, Thomas Roderick 1986
(Yadav 2007 Journal of Biomolecular Techniques)
6. Genomes as matrices or molecules
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4
Individual 1 0 2 0 1
Individual 2 0 2 0 1
Individual 3 1 1 0 2
Individual 4 0 2 1 2
GTTGTCTTGGCTATTTTGCTGGACCATCCCTGTAAGGCTGCT
CTGCCCTGCTCCTCTCTGCCTCCAGCAGTGCTATTAAGGGAA
GGAGGGAGCTGTGAATTCCTGCAGTCTCTGGGAGCGGAGCA
AAGCGAAGCCGAACTCCCGTTTCCATGTCGCTGCGGGACTC
CCGGTAAATATCCGTCCGTCCGCTGCGGGTGATGCGAAGGA
CGCTCGCGCGAGGCGCCGTGCCGCTCCGTAACACATAGCAC
CCACTGGCGGGCGGGCACGCGCGCACCGAGAGGAGGACGA
AAAGGAAGCGCCGACTTTCCGACCGCCGCTTTCCGAACGGA
GAAGCCTTCCCCGGCAGAGCCCTTCCTTCTGCCTCCCGCCC
CGCCGCCGTAGGCATGTTCCCGAGGCGCTCCGCACCGCGG
GGAGCTCCCGTTTTCCGCCCGGCGGCCGCAGAGGAGCAGC
AGCAGCGCGGTTCGGAGTAACTCCAAGTGATGCGGGGACCA
CAGCCCGAGAGCAGCACGCGCTCCCGCAGACGCCAGCCCC
GCCGCACTCAGGTCGACCATGGTTGCCGCCACCCGCTCCCT
CCTGGCGCTGCTGCTCTGCCGGGTGCTGCTGGGCGGCGCG
GCCGGCCTCATGCCGGAGGTGGGACGGCGGCGCTTCAGCG
AACCGGGCCGCGCCGCCTCGGCCGCGCAGCGCCCCGAGGA
CCTCCTGGGCGAGTTCGAGCTGCGCCTG
vs
7. The gene concept
A a
A AA Aa
A AA Aa
vs
instrumental nominal
(Griffith & Stotz 2006 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics)
8. Statistical perspective: Genomic data is a large set of markers; we are
agnostic about their function.
Sequence perspective: Genomic data is a source of causative variants; we
need to find them and exploit them.
10. Genomic selection
(Pig by Alice Noir from the Noun Project)
Reference population
Measurements
SNP chip genotypes
Genomic prediction model
Selection candidates
SNP chip genotypes
Predicted breeding values
11. Effect of genomic selection
Cattle: Increased accuracy allows shortening generation time (Hayes
et al 2009)
Pigs: Increased accuracy by half (Knol, Nielsen & Knap 2016)
Chickens: Increased accuracy (Wolc et al. 2016)
13. Landmark genomic selection papers
Lande & Thompson (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in
the improvement of quantitative traits
Haley & Visscher (1998) Strategies to utilize marker-quantitative trait
loci associations
Meuwissen, Hayes & Goddard (2001) Prediction of total genetic value
using genome-wide dense marker maps
14. Further statistical genomics tools
Designing mating plans to manage genetic variation
Population genetic classification, assignment, admixture
Genotype imputation
22. Why haven’t we found the
causative variants yet?
Polygenicity
The fine mapping problem
23. ‘We can now see it as progressing in four phases: (i) making a broad
sweep map (~20 cM) with both highly informative (microsatellite)
and evolutionary conserved (gene) markers; (ii) using the informative
markers to identify regions of chromosomes containing quantitative
trait loci (QTL) controlling commercially important traits–this
requires complex pedigrees or crosses between phenotypically and
genetically divergent strains; (iii) progressing from the informative
markers into the QTL and identifying trait genes(s) themselves
either by complex pedigrees or back-crossing experiments, and/or
using the conserved markers to identify candidate genes from their
position in the gene-rich species; (iv) functional analysis of the trait
genes to link the genome through physiology to the trait–the
‘phenotype gap’.’
Bulfield (2000)
31. Jenko et al.
2015
Jenko et al (2015) Genet Select Evol
Promotion of alleles by genome editing (PAGE)
Genomic selection + PAGE
Geneticgain
Generations
Genomic selection only
34. There are (at least) two ways to think of genomics in animal breeding
The statistical perspective is doing the heavy lifting, currently
The bright sequence future—are we there yet?
35. ‘It is rarely possible to identify the pertinent genes in a Mendelian
way or to map the chromosomal position of any of them. Fortunately
this inability to identify and describe the genes individually is almost
no handicap to the breeder of economic plants or animals. What he
would actually do if he knew the details about all the genes which
affect a quantitative character in that population differs little from
what he will do if he merely knows how heritable it is and whether
much of the hereditary variance comes from dominance or
overdominance, and from epistatic interactions between the genes.’
Lush (1949)
36. ‘I believe animal breeding in the post-genomic era will be
dramatically different to what it is today. There will be a massive
research effort to discover the function of genes including the effect of
DNA polymorphisms on phenotype. Breeding programmes will utilize
a large number of DNA-based tests for specific genes combined with
new reproductive techniques and transgenes to increase the rate of
genetic improvement and to produce for, or allocate animals to, the
product line to which they are best suited. However, this stage will
not be reached for some years by which time many of the early
investors will have given up, disappointed with the early benefits. ‘
Goddard (2003)
Thanks for inviting me. Gregor has talked about quantitative genetics – I will talk about genomics
thinking of genomics from a statistical perspective, or a molecular perspective, which I think is a fruitful way to understand some of the things that are going on in animal breeding and modern quantitative genetics.
Twitter handle.
We are going to do three things in this talk:
Look at the statistical and sequence perspectives on genomics in animal breeding (the matrices and the molecules)
Then, we’re going to look at the tools of the trade, and what these two perspectives allow animal breeders and animal breeding researchers to do
Finally, we’re going to go into future genomic breeding.
In short, I would argue, that the statistical perspective is what powers contemporary animal breeding, and the sequence perspective is a matter of research, maybe will become more important in the future
I did my PhD on chickens, which is great because it’s a livestock animal people often have a relationship to
‘My grandma had chickens …’
People also say, with resignation in their voice, ‘those huge chickens, that’s all genetic manipulation, isn’t it?’
This is from a study where they raised commercial Aviagen Ross broilers (2005) with lines that have been unselected since 50s and 70s
This is genetic improvement: a lot more of the products that humans care about from animals, and per unit of input. Better productivity, fertility, welfare, that slowly accumulates
This is before genomics – the first genotyping SNP chip for the chicken was released in 2005 .. Aviagen writes on their website that they started with genomics in 2012
Brief detour: the word ‘genomics’ from genome
The genome is all the DNA in an organism
Apparently they met in a bar to discuss founding the journal Genomics ... I feel like this is the kind of story biologists love to tell
There are two perspectives on genomics in animal breeding.
On the one hand, we can view the genomes of a population as a large matrix of ancestry indicators. Row individual, column variable position (we only store the ones that differ between individuals). If the variable positions come in two variants, arbitrarily coded as 1/0, and individuals are diploid, there are three states 0,1,2 (genotypes). Possibly we should show two rows for each individual, if we knew which variants occur together on one chromosome (genotypes are then said to be phased).
On the other hand, we can think of DNA as a long string of ACTG. Often we talk of “the genome” as the overall structure of one species or population, but really, each individual has its own, and nowadays, we have the technology to interrogate the whole genome of individuals. It’s just expensive.
I think that these two perspectives on genomics align with two different conceptions of genes, described by Griffith and Stotz (others have made similar observations)
instrumental, which dates back to classical genetics, before we knew that genes were made of DNA. Genes are indirectly observed in crosses, they can follow the laws of Mendelian inheritance, and thanks to quantitative genetics theory (Fisher et al.) we know that quantitative traits can also be explained by individual genes that segregate like this, only many of them.
Then there’s the nominal gene … Where a gene is a piece of DNA that has a name and some (known or putative) function. This is the concept that underpins genome browsers like Ensembl.
FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT -- NOT REDUCIBLE
In summary, the two perspectives are …
MARKERS – they tell us the genotype in a certain part of the genome, but we don’t care so much about if they’re in genes, if they have any effect on their own, or whatever
CAUSATIVE VARIANST – variants that make a difference to a trait we care about (either qualitative but most often quantitative)
So, what can you do with a large matrix of anonymous ancestry markers? It turns out, a lot.
Most importantly, I think, you can do genomic selection, which is the way to make selection decisions in breeding, over the last ten years or so. (introduced in chickens around 2012, diary 2009)
USE MARKERS THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE GENOME TO ESTIMATE BREEDING VALUES
You take your reference population, where you measure things, genotype markers (usually with a SNP chip, that contains the order of a few 10 000s of markers), and build a statistical model that allows you to predict the breeding values of animals from genotypes.
Then you go to your selection candidates, genotype them, and then you can predict their breeding values, as soon as you can get a DNA sample.
This can make selection faster or more accurate, depending on the species
Marker assisted selection … the idea that you would find variants that matter, and then put them into your selection program.
At some point during the 1990s to early 2000s, a shift happened, went from marker assisted selection to genomic selection.
Went from arguing that we should find the variants, to arguing that we should ignore function, and just cover the genome with markers.
You will notice that this is a shift from the sequence perspective to statistical perspective.
"we're going to find the variants that give the most growth, genotype and increase them in our breeding program" to "we're going to genotype every variant in every chromosome in every pig"
MHG -- simulation study of the full case for genomic selection, showing that it could work -- mind you, BEFORE SNP chips were available
other papers -- developing MAS towards GS
LT -- the idea of covering the genome in markers, a genomic score to select on
HV -- replacing relationship matrix with genomic relationship, getting estimates for the entire genome in proportion to its variance explained -- my favourite candidate for the paper that has the GS idea articulated
Chicken: polymorphic maps (this is what will lead to SNP chips), and ”framework for discovering functional polymorphisms underlying quantitative traits, thus fully exploiting the genetic potential of the chicken”
Cattle: “The cattle genome and associated resources will facilitate the identification of novel functions and regulatory systems of general importance in mammals and may provide an enabling tool for genetic improvement within the beef and dairy industries.”
Pig: pushes the evolutionary and biomedical angle, but “The genome sequence also provides a valuable resource enabling effective uses of pigs both in agricultural production and in biomedical research.”
The genome sequence itself is not much use unless we understand what’s in it
After genome sequencing -- variant discovery
"Sequencing leads to more sequencing"
Here are publications for important SNP chips for livestock. Also lower density, and later high density chips … but these are the industry standard chips.
Genomic selection has hit the animal genomics community!
They explicitly motivate this with genomic selection. The cattle and pig papers cite Meuwissen, Hayes, Goddard (2001).
GWAS … localize causative variants in the genome ... Before that Quantitative trait locus mapping
Look for variants associated with traits – chromosomal chunks associated with traits
Manhattan ... Dundee
Causative variant identification has turned out to be a very hard problem
It is funny to look back at early reviews of genomics in animal breeding ..
All these technologies … expressed sequence tags, line-cross linkage QTL mapping, candidate genes, radiation hybrid maps, even microarrays … all sound so quaint now. They did not lead to massive causative variant identification 20 years ago
Our impressive list of technologies now: open chromatin sequencing, single cell rna sequencing, genomewide CRISPR screens, … will they lead to massive causative variant identification? We hope so
And that brings us to the genomic breeding of the future. What will we be able to do with genomics?
GS in more species, industries, maybe smallholder farmers bypassing the need for pedigrees, larger datasets
GS and optimal contributions selection with dominance, maybe in crossbreeding systems
GS that somehow accounts for functional information about variants
Looking in the literature, a sort of consensus about what will happen -- similar to the pre-GS consensus, except it now acknowledges GS as an intermediary stage
Funny that they’ve chosen different version numbers
New stage where we can engineer genotypes, put the causative variants that we want in
This is the list people usually give for what can be done with genome editing and roughly the order it will happen.
Single high value edits – PRRS resistance in pigs, polling in cattle
Repair broken variants – there are lots of them in domestic animals
Promote beneficial alleles for quantitative traits
The PRRS virus exploits the CD163 protein to get from a vesicle into the cytosol when it enters the cell. If you knock it out, you lock the virus out – like changing locks after you get your keys stolen.
This figure shows infected macrophages and virus does in cells from homozygous knockout pigs
Several research groups have done that – I think this one seems the most promising (I wasn’t involved in the project, so I feel free to say that, but bear in mind they are from the Roslin too) – it just removes part of the gene, the domain that the virus uses, which seems to leave the rest of the function of the gene intact
As sequence data accumulates, we get the opportunity to identify variants directly from sequence data. There is a series of bioinformatic methods to do this.
Guessing causative variants from sequence data alone is hard, but getting at deleterious variants could be possible (as opposed to the more subtle, often regulatory, variants that we believe cause beneficial variation).
So we’ve come up with a strategy to do this
So, a few years ago, my colleagues (especially John Hickey and Janez Jenko) were interested in whether genome editing can actually improve quantitative traits.
The short answer is: yes, if you can find the causative variants, you can!
So, we assume that we can discover causal variants and rank them in order of effect, and edit the 20 largest effect variants in all the sires over 20 generations.
That doubles genetic gain.
That is assuming a lot, but I’d like to highlight one important thing that it doesn’t assume: we don’t assume extremely large effect quanitative trait loci (we work with a polygenic trait with 10000 variants, and normal distribution for effects)
Myostatin – double muscling in Belgian blue, Piedmonese
Knock it in other animals, double muscled pigs, some indications that they may have problems – most importantly, no-one is really excited about putting this into breeding, why?
This is great as research into gene function, and into developing editing
BUT FUNDAMENTALLY THE WRONG MENTAL MODEL OF ANIMAL BREEDING – we don’t know enough about animals to design genomes – what we can do is discover some causative variants and adding them to our breeding practice in a good way
Here is an example from tomato – they have two genes in a developmental pathway where one inhibits the other, and they now that less of one gene will lead to more of the good stuff
This is the kind of hypothetical relationship we will get from doing expression QTL mapping and screening in cell lines.
Here they take a regulatory region of one of the genes, and scramble it by cutting it and letting the cell repair, and measure the outcomes.
They get this synthetic allelic series that modulates gene expression, and then they can pick the ones that give the most of what they want (many locules per fruit). A humble form of pathway engineering.
I’m going to end on two quotes of how nothing is new under the sun.
We’re going to start with Jay Lush, one of the originators of quantitative genetics for animal breeding, who pronounces the proud agnosticism about gene function that has served animal breeding well
Then, some tempered optimism by Mike Goddard, who still in 2003, two years after Meuwissen Hayes Goddard, believed that functional genes are important – and still works towards discovering them, in parallel with developing new methods for genomic selection