The maxilla is the middle third of the facial skeleton, formed by two pyramidal halves. It has four processes and a hollow body forming the maxillary sinuses. It assists in forming several structures and is attached to the skull base by strong buttresses that distribute forces. The maxilla has transverse and vertical buttresses. Children have smaller sinuses and tooth buds, while adults have larger sinuses penetrating the midface. The alveolar process provides tooth support but weakens with tooth loss. Maxillary fractures can occur from direct impacts and vary in severity and pattern. The Le Fort classification identifies fracture patterns based on lines of weakness. Treatment involves reduction, immobilization with intermaxillary fixation, and stabilization with plates or wires
Fractures of the Middle-third of the Facial Skeleton (1).pptxPalPal12
This document discusses fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton. It begins by defining the middle third as being bounded superiorly by the zygomaticofrontal suture and inferiorly by the occlusal plane. It is comprised of 8 paired and 2 unpaired bones. The bones are fragile and articulate complexly. Fractures in this region are generally comminuted and can cause a "dish face deformity" with inward crushing. Due to the angle of the cranial base, fractures result in backward and downward displacement, causing open bite and airway obstruction. Comminution of the orbital floor can cause diplopia. Fractures of the cribriform plate provide direct access to the anterior
Indian Dental Academy: will be one of the most relevant and exciting training center with best faculty and flexible training programs for dental professionals who wish to advance in their dental practice,Offers certified courses in Dental implants,Orthodontics,Endodontics,Cosmetic Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontics and General Dentistry.
This document discusses midface fractures, including:
- The Le Fort classification system divides midface fractures into 3 types based on the fracture lines. Le Fort I involves the maxilla, Le Fort II is a pyramidal fracture, and Le Fort III is a craniofacial disjunction.
- Common causes of midface fractures are motor vehicle accidents, assaults, and falls. Maxillary bones and the zygomatic bone are frequently involved.
- Clinical features of a Le Fort I fracture include swelling of the upper lip and palate, a "cracked pot" sound from tapping teeth, and mobility of the maxilla. Le Fort II fractures result in "moon face" swelling and "raccoon
Mandibular fractures have been documented since ancient Greece. Hippocrates described reducing displaced but incomplete mandibular fractures by pressing on the lingual surface with fingers while applying counterpressure externally. The Edwin Smith Treatise also described examining for mandibular fractures by feeling for crepitus under the fingers. Mandibular fractures typically involve the body, angle, condyle, symphysis, or ramus. Physical exam may reveal changes in occlusion, inability to open or close the mouth, anesthesia of the lower lip, or trismus. Diagnosis is made by identifying these physical exam findings along with the patient's mechanism of injury.
Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Students Fifth Year First semester
Lecture Name maxillofacial trauma part 2
Al Azhar University Gaza Palestine
Dr. Lama El Banna
The document discusses the anatomy and biomechanics of facial bone fractures. It begins by describing the structures that make up the skull - the cranial vault, base, and facial skeleton. It then discusses the classification of common midface fractures according to the Le Fort system. The rest of the document details the epidemiology, characteristics, and treatment of various types of facial fractures including nasal, orbital, zygomatic, panfacial and mandibular fractures. Modern treatment primarily involves early open reduction and internal fixation using miniplates and screws.
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi, Oral Surgeon, Pune All Good Things
Hi. This is Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Oral & Maxillofacial surgeon from Pune, India. I am here on slideshare.com to share some of my own presentations presented at various levels in the field of OMFS. Hope this would somehow be helpful to you making your presentations. All the best.
Fractures of the Middle-third of the Facial Skeleton (1).pptxPalPal12
This document discusses fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton. It begins by defining the middle third as being bounded superiorly by the zygomaticofrontal suture and inferiorly by the occlusal plane. It is comprised of 8 paired and 2 unpaired bones. The bones are fragile and articulate complexly. Fractures in this region are generally comminuted and can cause a "dish face deformity" with inward crushing. Due to the angle of the cranial base, fractures result in backward and downward displacement, causing open bite and airway obstruction. Comminution of the orbital floor can cause diplopia. Fractures of the cribriform plate provide direct access to the anterior
Indian Dental Academy: will be one of the most relevant and exciting training center with best faculty and flexible training programs for dental professionals who wish to advance in their dental practice,Offers certified courses in Dental implants,Orthodontics,Endodontics,Cosmetic Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontics and General Dentistry.
This document discusses midface fractures, including:
- The Le Fort classification system divides midface fractures into 3 types based on the fracture lines. Le Fort I involves the maxilla, Le Fort II is a pyramidal fracture, and Le Fort III is a craniofacial disjunction.
- Common causes of midface fractures are motor vehicle accidents, assaults, and falls. Maxillary bones and the zygomatic bone are frequently involved.
- Clinical features of a Le Fort I fracture include swelling of the upper lip and palate, a "cracked pot" sound from tapping teeth, and mobility of the maxilla. Le Fort II fractures result in "moon face" swelling and "raccoon
Mandibular fractures have been documented since ancient Greece. Hippocrates described reducing displaced but incomplete mandibular fractures by pressing on the lingual surface with fingers while applying counterpressure externally. The Edwin Smith Treatise also described examining for mandibular fractures by feeling for crepitus under the fingers. Mandibular fractures typically involve the body, angle, condyle, symphysis, or ramus. Physical exam may reveal changes in occlusion, inability to open or close the mouth, anesthesia of the lower lip, or trismus. Diagnosis is made by identifying these physical exam findings along with the patient's mechanism of injury.
Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Students Fifth Year First semester
Lecture Name maxillofacial trauma part 2
Al Azhar University Gaza Palestine
Dr. Lama El Banna
The document discusses the anatomy and biomechanics of facial bone fractures. It begins by describing the structures that make up the skull - the cranial vault, base, and facial skeleton. It then discusses the classification of common midface fractures according to the Le Fort system. The rest of the document details the epidemiology, characteristics, and treatment of various types of facial fractures including nasal, orbital, zygomatic, panfacial and mandibular fractures. Modern treatment primarily involves early open reduction and internal fixation using miniplates and screws.
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi, Oral Surgeon, Pune All Good Things
Hi. This is Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Oral & Maxillofacial surgeon from Pune, India. I am here on slideshare.com to share some of my own presentations presented at various levels in the field of OMFS. Hope this would somehow be helpful to you making your presentations. All the best.
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit Suryawanshi .Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS). Oral &...All Good Things
Description:
Hi. This is Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS) Oral & Maxillofacial surgeon from Kolhapur, India. I am here on slideshare.com to share some of my own presentations presented at various levels in the field of OMFS. Hope this would somehow be helpful to you making your presentations. All the best & your replies are welcomed!
The naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) region consists of a complex of delicate bones that form the central upper midface. Fractures in this region can be challenging to manage due to the anatomy. The NOE region contains four cavities and is reinforced by vertical and horizontal buttresses. It is supplied by arteries and innervated by branches of the trigeminal nerve. Clinical evaluation of NOE fractures involves examining for signs of injuries to the nose, eyes, medial canthal tendon, and possible intracranial involvement. Classification systems help determine fracture patterns and guide management.
This document discusses midface fractures, known as LeFort fractures. It begins by defining the midface region and describing the bones that make up the midface. It then discusses the classic classifications of LeFort fractures as proposed by LeFort himself and others. Specifically, it describes LeFort I, II, and III fractures in terms of their etiology, fracture lines, and clinical signs. Radiographic examination including waters view and CT are important for diagnosis. Pre-operative planning considers the type of fixation and stabilization needed. Management involves open reduction with plates, screws or wires as well as intermaxillary fixation devices.
The document discusses mid facial fractures, which involve the bones of the central face between the forehead and upper jaw. It describes the classification systems for mid facial fractures proposed by Le Fort and others. Le Fort I fractures involve the upper jaw, Le Fort II involve the pyramidal bones, and Le Fort III involve separation of the mid face from the skull. Common causes are motor vehicle accidents and assaults. Clinical features vary depending on the fracture type but may include swelling, bruising, numbness, and mobility of facial bones. Diagnosis involves imaging like CT scans. Treatment goals are to restore facial structure and function, often through closed or open reduction and internal fixation of the bones.
Indian Dental Academy: will be one of the most relevant and exciting training center with best faculty and flexible training programs for dental professionals who wish to advance in their dental practice,Offers certified courses in Dental implants,Orthodontics,Endodontics,Cosmetic Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontics and General Dentistry.
This document discusses orbital fractures, including:
- The surgical anatomy of the orbit and boundaries like the lateral wall and medial wall.
- Biomechanics, etiology, fracture patterns, and classification of orbital fractures.
- Clinical presentation, diagnosis using imaging like CT, and management including complications.
- Recent trends involve use of stereolithography models and computer-assisted reconstruction based on cone beam tomography for complex orbital fractures.
This document provides an overview of various conditions involving the foot and ankle that can be evaluated on radiology imaging. It discusses accessory ossicles that can occur in the foot and be a cause of pain. It also reviews conditions like rocker bottom foot, tarsal coalition, fractures around the ankle joint involving the lateral malleolus, tibial plafond, talus and calcaneus. Other topics covered include osteochondral defects of the talus, accessory ossicles of the foot, and angles used to evaluate calcaneal fractures.
Maxillofacial fractures usually occur as the result of massive facial trauma and can include fractures of the mandible, nasal bones, maxilla, and zygomatic bones. Cervical spine fractures include fractures of C1-C2 as well as burst, compression, and teardrop fractures of the lower cervical vertebrae. Humerus fractures are classified as one, two, three, or four-part fractures. Distal radius fractures include Colles', Smith's, Barton's, and Galeazzi fractures. Hip fractures are classified as femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fractures. Common foot fractures are Lisfranc fractures and fractures of the metatarsals
This document discusses maxillary fractures, including:
1) It classifies maxillary fractures according to Le Fort's classification system into Le Fort I, II, and III fractures based on the fracture pattern and location.
2) It describes the signs, symptoms, and features of each type of fracture both externally such as swelling and internally such as dental mobility.
3) It discusses methods for evaluating and managing maxillary fractures including reduction techniques, fixation methods, and immobilization.
The document discusses naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures, which involve the central upper midface region. It describes the anatomy and classification of NOE fractures. Markowitz classification system categorizes NOE fractures into 5 types based on the status of the central bony fragment and involvement of the medial canthal tendon. Type I and II fractures involve a single or displaced central fragment with an intact tendon. Type III fractures have comminution beneath the tendon. Imaging such as CT is important for diagnosis.
The document discusses fractures of the talus bone. It provides a brief history of studies on talus injuries from 1919 to 1970. It then describes the anatomy of the talus bone and its limited blood supply. Different classification systems for talus fractures are mentioned. Treatment depends on fracture type but generally involves closed or open reduction and internal fixation to restore alignment and blood flow. Complications like osteonecrosis can occur depending on displacement and are challenging to treat.
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a bilateral synovial joint that connects the mandible to the temporal bone. It has several unique features, including an articular disc that divides the joint into two compartments. The TMJ is innervated by the auriculotemporal nerve and receives its blood supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Common disorders of the TMJ include myofascial pain, derangements of the disc-condyle complex, and inflammatory conditions like arthritis. Treatment for TMJ disorders focuses on conservative and reversible therapies.
The document discusses the anatomy of the orbital walls and contents, including the bones that make up each wall, their relations and clinical applications. It also describes the ciliary ganglion in detail, including the nerves that pass through it and their roles in sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of the eye. Key structures discussed include the orbital fissures, foramina, and the relations and functions of the ciliary ganglion.
Dentist in pune.(BDS) MDS- OMFS - Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi.. Mandibular fractu...All Good Things
Dentist in pune. (BDS. MDS) - Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Seminar-Canine Impaction.
Email ID- amitsuryawanshi999@gmail.com
Contact -Ph no.-9405622455
Subscribe our channel on youtube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_gylEXTrjmEbbOTSXjuZ4Q/videos?view_as=public
Follow us on slideshare
The orbital cavity contains the eyeball and surrounding structures. It is pear shaped with seven bones forming its walls. Key structures discussed include the openings like the superior and inferior orbital fissures which connect the orbit to the brain. The document outlines the anatomy, dimensions, walls, openings and relations of the orbital cavity. It also discusses variations with age and surface anatomy landmarks.
This document provides an overview of the anatomy of the orbit and its walls, including the medial, lateral, inferior, and roof walls. It describes the bones that form each wall and their relationships to surrounding structures. It also discusses the base of the orbit, orbital apex, periorbita, orbital fascia, and common congenital anomalies seen in the orbit. In summary, it provides a detailed anatomical description of the bony orbit and its contents to understand its structure and clinical applications.
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit Suryawanshi .Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS). Oral &...All Good Things
Description:
Hi. This is Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS) Oral & Maxillofacial surgeon from Kolhapur, India. I am here on slideshare.com to share some of my own presentations presented at various levels in the field of OMFS. Hope this would somehow be helpful to you making your presentations. All the best & your replies are welcomed!
The naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) region consists of a complex of delicate bones that form the central upper midface. Fractures in this region can be challenging to manage due to the anatomy. The NOE region contains four cavities and is reinforced by vertical and horizontal buttresses. It is supplied by arteries and innervated by branches of the trigeminal nerve. Clinical evaluation of NOE fractures involves examining for signs of injuries to the nose, eyes, medial canthal tendon, and possible intracranial involvement. Classification systems help determine fracture patterns and guide management.
This document discusses midface fractures, known as LeFort fractures. It begins by defining the midface region and describing the bones that make up the midface. It then discusses the classic classifications of LeFort fractures as proposed by LeFort himself and others. Specifically, it describes LeFort I, II, and III fractures in terms of their etiology, fracture lines, and clinical signs. Radiographic examination including waters view and CT are important for diagnosis. Pre-operative planning considers the type of fixation and stabilization needed. Management involves open reduction with plates, screws or wires as well as intermaxillary fixation devices.
The document discusses mid facial fractures, which involve the bones of the central face between the forehead and upper jaw. It describes the classification systems for mid facial fractures proposed by Le Fort and others. Le Fort I fractures involve the upper jaw, Le Fort II involve the pyramidal bones, and Le Fort III involve separation of the mid face from the skull. Common causes are motor vehicle accidents and assaults. Clinical features vary depending on the fracture type but may include swelling, bruising, numbness, and mobility of facial bones. Diagnosis involves imaging like CT scans. Treatment goals are to restore facial structure and function, often through closed or open reduction and internal fixation of the bones.
Indian Dental Academy: will be one of the most relevant and exciting training center with best faculty and flexible training programs for dental professionals who wish to advance in their dental practice,Offers certified courses in Dental implants,Orthodontics,Endodontics,Cosmetic Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontics and General Dentistry.
This document discusses orbital fractures, including:
- The surgical anatomy of the orbit and boundaries like the lateral wall and medial wall.
- Biomechanics, etiology, fracture patterns, and classification of orbital fractures.
- Clinical presentation, diagnosis using imaging like CT, and management including complications.
- Recent trends involve use of stereolithography models and computer-assisted reconstruction based on cone beam tomography for complex orbital fractures.
This document provides an overview of various conditions involving the foot and ankle that can be evaluated on radiology imaging. It discusses accessory ossicles that can occur in the foot and be a cause of pain. It also reviews conditions like rocker bottom foot, tarsal coalition, fractures around the ankle joint involving the lateral malleolus, tibial plafond, talus and calcaneus. Other topics covered include osteochondral defects of the talus, accessory ossicles of the foot, and angles used to evaluate calcaneal fractures.
Maxillofacial fractures usually occur as the result of massive facial trauma and can include fractures of the mandible, nasal bones, maxilla, and zygomatic bones. Cervical spine fractures include fractures of C1-C2 as well as burst, compression, and teardrop fractures of the lower cervical vertebrae. Humerus fractures are classified as one, two, three, or four-part fractures. Distal radius fractures include Colles', Smith's, Barton's, and Galeazzi fractures. Hip fractures are classified as femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fractures. Common foot fractures are Lisfranc fractures and fractures of the metatarsals
This document discusses maxillary fractures, including:
1) It classifies maxillary fractures according to Le Fort's classification system into Le Fort I, II, and III fractures based on the fracture pattern and location.
2) It describes the signs, symptoms, and features of each type of fracture both externally such as swelling and internally such as dental mobility.
3) It discusses methods for evaluating and managing maxillary fractures including reduction techniques, fixation methods, and immobilization.
The document discusses naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures, which involve the central upper midface region. It describes the anatomy and classification of NOE fractures. Markowitz classification system categorizes NOE fractures into 5 types based on the status of the central bony fragment and involvement of the medial canthal tendon. Type I and II fractures involve a single or displaced central fragment with an intact tendon. Type III fractures have comminution beneath the tendon. Imaging such as CT is important for diagnosis.
The document discusses fractures of the talus bone. It provides a brief history of studies on talus injuries from 1919 to 1970. It then describes the anatomy of the talus bone and its limited blood supply. Different classification systems for talus fractures are mentioned. Treatment depends on fracture type but generally involves closed or open reduction and internal fixation to restore alignment and blood flow. Complications like osteonecrosis can occur depending on displacement and are challenging to treat.
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a bilateral synovial joint that connects the mandible to the temporal bone. It has several unique features, including an articular disc that divides the joint into two compartments. The TMJ is innervated by the auriculotemporal nerve and receives its blood supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Common disorders of the TMJ include myofascial pain, derangements of the disc-condyle complex, and inflammatory conditions like arthritis. Treatment for TMJ disorders focuses on conservative and reversible therapies.
The document discusses the anatomy of the orbital walls and contents, including the bones that make up each wall, their relations and clinical applications. It also describes the ciliary ganglion in detail, including the nerves that pass through it and their roles in sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of the eye. Key structures discussed include the orbital fissures, foramina, and the relations and functions of the ciliary ganglion.
Dentist in pune.(BDS) MDS- OMFS - Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi.. Mandibular fractu...All Good Things
Dentist in pune. (BDS. MDS) - Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi. Seminar-Canine Impaction.
Email ID- amitsuryawanshi999@gmail.com
Contact -Ph no.-9405622455
Subscribe our channel on youtube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_gylEXTrjmEbbOTSXjuZ4Q/videos?view_as=public
Follow us on slideshare
The orbital cavity contains the eyeball and surrounding structures. It is pear shaped with seven bones forming its walls. Key structures discussed include the openings like the superior and inferior orbital fissures which connect the orbit to the brain. The document outlines the anatomy, dimensions, walls, openings and relations of the orbital cavity. It also discusses variations with age and surface anatomy landmarks.
This document provides an overview of the anatomy of the orbit and its walls, including the medial, lateral, inferior, and roof walls. It describes the bones that form each wall and their relationships to surrounding structures. It also discusses the base of the orbit, orbital apex, periorbita, orbital fascia, and common congenital anomalies seen in the orbit. In summary, it provides a detailed anatomical description of the bony orbit and its contents to understand its structure and clinical applications.
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotesPsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kol...rightmanforbloodline
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Versio
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
TEST BANK For An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 7th Edition by Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw, Verified Chapters 1 - 16, Complete Newest Version
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdfJim Jacob Roy
Osteoporosis is an increasing cause of morbidity among the elderly.
In this document , a brief outline of osteoporosis is given , including the risk factors of osteoporosis fractures , the indications for testing bone mineral density and the management of osteoporosis
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseHealth Advances
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
2. Middle third of the facial skeleton
Formed by union of two symmetrical irregular
pyramidal halves
A body and four processes
Frontal
Zygomatic
Palatine
Alveolar
3. Body is hollowed on its anterior aspect forming
the maxillary sinuses
Assists in formation of
Orbit (orbital floor)
Nasal fossa
Oral cavity
Palate
Pyriform aperture
Support for the nasal bones and nasal cartilages
4.
5.
6. Attached to the base of the skull by a series of
buttresses
Vertical system strong and capable of
Horizontal system resisting force
The buttress system distributes the load over
the entire craniofacial skeleton
7. Vertical buttresses
Anteriorly, the nasofrontal buttress
Laterally, the zygomaticomaxillary buttress
Posteriorly, the pterygomaxillary buttress
8.
9.
10. Transverse maxillary buttresses include
The superior orbital rims
The inferior orbital rims
The palate
11.
12. The forces are distributed through
The articulation of the maxilla against the
frontomaxillary, zygomaticomaxillary, and ethmoidal
maxillary sutures
The palatine bone and pterygoid plates of the
sphenoid give additional stability posteriorly to the
maxilla which extend to the strong buttresses of the
sphenoid bone in the skull base
The vomer, the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid,
and the zygoma distribute the load to the temporal
and frontal bones and to the anterior cranial fossa
13.
14. Children
Maxillary sinuses are small
Tooth buds are present
Adults
Large
Penetrate most of the central structure of the midface,
nose, and periorbital area
Thus a thin orbital floor and thin anterior and posterior
medial wall of the maxilla
Tooth buds are absent in adult and causes weakening
of the bone of the midface
15.
16. Alveolar process of the maxilla
Strong and thick
Provides excellent support to the teeth
Also support the horizontal processes of the
maxilla through the palate
Alveolar process thins, weakens, and resorbs
with loss of teeth and entire maxilla may thus
become weaker, and recession may occur
Resorption of the anterior surfaces of the
maxilla may occur simultaneously
17. Muscles attaching to the maxilla
Muscles of facial expression anteriorly
Pterygoid muscles posteriorly
Although muscle contraction has less role but it
explains the displacement of the fractured
segments
18.
19.
20. The nerves pass through
Anterior wall of the maxilla (anterior superior dental
alveolar nerve and other branches of infraorbital
nerve)
Palatine canal between the maxilla and the palatine
bones in the posterior portion of the palate (palatine
branches of the second division of the trigeminal
nerve)
Lateral walls of the maxilla (branches of the
posterior superior dental alveolar nerves)
21.
22. Direct impact
Vary from simple incomplete fractures of a
portion of the alveolar process of the maxilla to
comminuted fractures of the entire midface
area
Pattern and distribution depend on the
magnitude and the direction of force
Frontal
Lateral
Inferior impact
23. Segmental fractures get displaced posteriorly by the
pterygoid muscles
Sagittal fracture gets pulled laterally by facial muscle
attachments
Higher maxillary fractures get displaced in downward
and backward direction by the pull of the pterygoid
muscles
Maxillary fractures in association with fractures of the
zygoma cause posterior and medial displacement of
fragment due to pull of masseter muscles
24.
25. Le Fort classification identifies the patterns of
midfacial fractures
The thinner areas- weakened sections through
which fracture lines occur, designated as "lines of
weakness"
Fracture lines travel adjacent to the thicker portions
of the bones, designated as "areas of strength”
Straightforward pure bilateral Le Fort I, Le Fort II, or
Le Fort III fractures are less common than
combination patterns
Fracture is usually more comminuted on the side of
the injury
26. The highest level and components of the fracture
on each side
Le Fort I: Maxillary alveolus
Split palate
Alveolar tuberosity fracture
Le Fort II: Pyramidal fracture
Le Fort III: Craniofacial disjunction
Le Fort IV: Frontal bone
27. Guérin fracture or transverse fracture
Traverse the maxilla horizontally above the level of
the apices of the maxillary teeth
Section the entire alveolar process of the maxilla,
vault of the palate, and inferior ends of the
pterygoid processes in a single block
Extends transversely across the base of the
maxillary sinuses and is almost always bilateral
28.
29. Pyramidal fractures
Blows to the central maxilla with a frontal
impact
The fracture begins above the level of the
apices of the maxillary teeth laterally and
posteriorly in the zygomaticomaxillary fissure
Extends through the pterygoid plates
30. Travels medially and superiorly to pass through
anterior wall of the maxillary sinus near
zygomatico-maxillary suture
Then passes through the orbital plate of maxilla
and medial portion of the inferior orbital rim
Crosses through the lacrimal bone and frontal
process of maxilla
31. Extends across the nasal bone, usually at the
junction of thin and thick parts of the bones
Damage to the ethmoidal areas is routine
Centrally, it may traverse the nose high (at the
junction of the nasal bones and frontal bone) or
low (through the nasal cartilages)
Frontal sinus may be fractured in high-energy
central midface impacts
32.
33. Craniofacial disjunction
Fracture extends through the zygomaticofrontal
suture and the nasal frontal suture
Across the floor of the orbits
Separate all midfacial structures from the cranium
Maxilla is usually separated from the zygoma
Traverses through upper one third of pterygoid
plates
34.
35.
36.
37. Antero-posterior fracture
Less common fractures
Splits the maxillary alveolus longitudinally near
the junction of the maxilla with the vomer
Exits anteriorly to traverse between the cuspid
teeth
Extends through the maxillary portion of hard
palate back through the horizontal portion of the
palatine bone
38. Usually involve the palate alone and Le Fort I
level, occasionally extend to the Le Fort II level
They increase the comminution of the Le Fort
fracture and make the treatment more difficult
Displacement depends on the direction and
degree of fracture and muscle forces
39.
40.
41. HISTORY
Frontal or lateral impact
Thrown forward, striking the middle third of the
face against an object such as steering wheel
of an automobile
Force sustained on the lower maxilla
An alveolar or transverse fracture of the maxilla is
likely
42. Force is more violent and sustained at a higher
level
Frontal impact- Le Fort II fracture
Higher energy impact injuries- combination of the Le
Fort I and Le Fort II fractures
Lateral impact- Le Fort III level fracture on one side
and a Le Fort II level fracture on the other side
Upward forces by impaction of the mandible
against the maxilla can cause maxillary
fractures
43. Elongated, retruded appearance in the middle
third of the facial skeleton, so-called donkey-
like facies
Maxillary dentition is frequently rotated
Le Fort fractures of all types- malocclusion and
bilateral maxillary sinus fluid on radiographs
Le Fort (II and III) fractures- bilateral periorbital
ecchymosis
44. Symmetrical facial swelling
Subconjunctival haemorrhage and swollen
eyelids
Epistaxis
CSF rhinorrhoea
Intra-oral examination
Ecchymosis in upper buccal sulcus
Irregularity of central portion of hard palate
Hematoma of the soft palate
45. Teeth examination
Complete transverse fractures-
vertical and downward displacement, may have normal
occlusion
Backward and downward displacement or lateral twist
of maxilla, and premature occlusion in the posterior
dentition with an anterior open bite occurs
Fractured segment is usually mobile or may be
impacted (manifest as an open bite)
46. On palpation
With the tips of the fingers both externally through
the skin and internally intraorally
Bimanual examination- grasp the teeth and
alveolar process between thumb and index finger of
one hand and movement is felt by palpating the face
with the fingers of the other hand
Mobility of the maxilla, may be absent in greenstick
fractures or impacted fractures
Infraorbital margin integrity (LeFort II)
47. If the maxilla medially is higher than the
zygoma
Zygomatic fracture
If the maxilla medially is lower than the zygoma
Pyramidal fracture
Nasal bones palpation
Nasal fracture is a routine component of Le Fort II
and III fractures
48. Plain films
Difficult to demonstrate on routine plain radiographs
Waters view
Caldwell view
Submental vertex views
Lateral view
Bilateral maxillary sinus opacity should always
suggest the possibility of a maxillary fracture
49. CT scan
Preferred for maxillary fractures
Especially those within the orbit, pterygoid plate and
palate
Axial and coronal CT scans taken from the palate
through the anterior cranial fossa
Both bone and soft tissue windows for evaluation of
the orbital portion of the fracture and for the brain
Bilateral maxillary sinus fluid usually represents a
maxillary fracture until proven otherwise
50. Emergency measures
Establishment of an airway
Control of hemorrhage
Closure of soft tissue lacerations
Placement of the patient in intermaxillary
fixation
51. Severly displaced fractures may block the airway
Hemorrhage, swelling, and secretions
Structures forced into the pharyngeal region, eg.,
Loose teeth, pieces of broken bone, broken
dentures, blood clot
Measures taken
Cleansing of the mouth
Removal of loose dentures or teeth
Prone positioning
Nasopharyngeal airway insertion
If transportation needed, tracheostomy may be required
52. Two components of treatment
Reduction of displaced fragments and their
replacement thus re-establishment of normal
occlusion
Immobilization of reduced segments against the
cranium until consolidation occurs
53. Arch bars ligated to the upper and lower
dentition and arch bars are linked with either
elastic or wire
As soon after a maxillary injury as possible
Eliminates much of the deformity of a midfacial
fracture
Reduces the distraction of the fragments
54.
55. Frequently facilitates cessation of hemorrhage
Places the maxilla at rest, which is an
important treatment when dural fistulas exist
When mandible is intact, it limits the downward
and posterior displacement of the lower portion
of the midface and keys a major portion of the
lower midface into proper anterior-posterior
reduction
56.
57. Importance of post-operative IMF
The midface should be considered a dependent
structure because of its thin bone which are not
conducive to stability
Most of its injuries are comminuted
Malleable plates and small screws viewed as a relative
positioning device rather than rigid fixation
Maxilla has weak sagittal buttresses
58. Alveolar fractures
Two guiding principles
1. Teeth of the non-fractured side of the maxilla are
utilized for reduction and fixation of the fractured
fragments
2. Teeth of the mandible are maintained in occlusion
with those of maxilla
59. Simple fractures can be digitally repositioned
Teeth selected for anchorage according to their
ability to withstand stress and strain
Methods
Horizontal and lateral interdental wiring
Intraoral retention appliances
Open reduction by plates and screws to unite
the alveolar fragment to the remainder of the
maxilla
60.
61. Maintainance of reduction
IMF
Barton bandage- figure of eight bandage
Fixation maintained for at least 4 to 12 weeks
or until clinical immobility has been achieved
62.
63. Complete separation of lower maxilla from its
attachment to remaining maxilla
Or separation of maxilla from the cranium
Floating maxilla
Treatment dictated by direction and degree of
displacement
Simple downward displacement- occlusion
maintained
Lateral or backward displacement- malocclusion is
present
64.
65. Immobilisation of maxilla against the cranium
maintaining the normal occlusion
Normal occlusion- IMF
Immobilisation
External splints- older method
Barton bandage
Adhesive tape made splint
Plaster headgear
Plate and screw fixation
66.
67. Suspension wires
Passed from the arch bars to a point above the most
superior level of the Le Fort fracture on each side
Thought to contribute to stability by compression of
the midfacial skeleton
But they reduced the vertical height of the midface
and retrude the midface
68. Suspension wires
LeFort I-
Zygomatic
Infraorbital
Piriform aperture
Circumzygomatic
LeFort II
Circumzygomatic
Frontal- central and lateral
LeFort III
Frontal- central and lateral
69.
70.
71.
72. Wire interfragment fixation
Was used for bone alignment and reduction
Provides only a one-dimensional force of apposition
so rigid bone stabilization not produced
Three-dimensional stabilization
Multiple wire points of fixation per fragment
Plate and screw technique which provides stability
by the placement of two screws (two points of
fixation) per bone fragment
73. The goals in midface fracture treatment
Achieving the original dimensions of the facial bones
to re-establish midfacial height and projection
Provide proper occlusion
Restore the integrity of the nose and orbit
Stabilize these dimensions with bone grafts and
plate and screw fixation
74. Anatomic reconstruction of the buttresses of the maxilla
Anteriorly, the nasomaxillary and
zygomaticomaxillary buttresses are reconstructed -
bone grafts and rigid fixation
Posterior height- IMF
Posterior (ramus) height of the mandible must be
correct for a proper reconstruction
Important to have the mandible anatomically
reconstructed as a buttress
Ramus and subcondylar fractures are stabilized by open
reduction and rigid fixation
75. Three incisions required for exposure
Molar to molar sublabial incision- access to maxillae,
up to the orbital rims
Blepharoplasty incision of the lower eyelid or
subconjunctival approach- access to inferior and
lateral walls of orbit
Bicoronal scalp incision extended down to the ears-
access to frontal, nasoethmoid, zygomatic process
and orbital bones and zygomatic arches
76.
77. Less frequent
Usually associated with fractures of the middle
third of the face
Absence of teeth provide a measure of
protection for the edentulous elderly patient
Older patients are not usually exposed to the
traumatic hazards of the lifestyle of the younger
age groups
Dentures provide some protection by absorbing
traumatic forces
78. Minimal displacement causing little facial
deformity
Soft diet for 3 to 8 weeks after which usually
healing has occurred
New denture is constructed after this to correct
malocclusion discrepancy
80. Today, reduction and immobilization of the
midface fracture segments by open reduction
and plate and screw fixation is usually
performed
81. If Le Fort I level segments are so comminuted
that accurate reduction is difficult, denture or a
splint designed to key the position of the lower
midface segments to the mandible is
recommended
Bone grafts may be required
Splints may be screwed temporarily to the
alveolus of the maxilla, palate, or mandible,
which provides a straightforward and rapid
initial fixation of the denture
82. Early
Haemorrhage
Airway obstruction
Infection
Lacrimal obstruction
CSF rhinorrhoea
Blindness
Late
Nonunion or malunion
Plate exposure
Lacrimal system obstruction
Infraorbital and lip hypoesthesia or anesthesia
Devitalization of teeth
83. Nasal cavity or nasopharynx
Tamponade in closed midface injuries
Anterior-posterior nasopharyngeal packing
Manual reduction of the displaced maxilla
Reduction in intermaxillary fixation
Angiographic embolization
External carotid and superficial temporal artery
ligation as a last resort
84. Airway is compromised by
Posterior displacement of the fracture fragments
Edema and swelling of the soft tissues in the nose,
mouth, and throat
Treatment
Nasopharyngeal airway
Intubation
Tracheostomy
85. Less common
Causes
Faulty immobilization of fragments
Foreign bodies in the wound
Teeth in the line of fracture
Associated soft tissue wounds
Pre-existing sinusitis may get flared up
86. Treatment
Removal of any devitalized bone fragments or soft
tissue
Sinus drainage by nasal-antral window or
endoscopic drainage of the maxillary sinus by
enlarging its orifice
Extraction of loose or devitalized teeth or foreign
material
Administration of antibiotics
87. High le fort (II and III) level fractures associated
with fractures of the cribriform area
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Recumbent nursing
Blowing of the nose and placement of obstructing
nasal packing should be avoided
88. Rare complication
May complicate le fort II and III
Cause
Swelling of the nerve within the tight portion of the
optic canal
Interference with the capillary blood supply of the
optic nerve by swelling and edema
Rarely optic nerve gets severed by bone fragments
89. True nonunion is rare
Delayed union is frequent
Thin bone of the maxillary sinuses
Comminuted fractures
Delayed union results in malocclusion
If the arch bars or intermaxillary fixation is
removed too soon, the maxilla may slowly drift
into malocclusion especially if comminuted
fracture at the le fort I level
90. Impacted fractures or partially healed fractures
Osteotomy and full open reduction
Occlusion maintained by intermaxillary fixation
Rigid fixation
Bone grafts
Lack of good bone or bone gaps in the buttress
areas
Taken from the calvarial, iliac, or rib donor sites
Attached with plate and screw fixation
Supplement (but do not replace) plates for rigid
fixation
91. Le Fort I and Le Fort III
Due to
Fracture displacement in the bones composing the
nasal lacrimal duct
Bone proliferation after fracture near the nasal
lacrimal canal that obstructs the duct in its bony path
Duct transection in the canal
92. Treatment
Canalicular lacrimal system is intact and duct is
obstructed- dacryocystorhinostomy
Nasal lacrimal sac and canaliculi injury
Protection against obstruction - anatomic
repositioning of the fracture fragments of the medial
portion of the maxilla and nasoethmoidal-orbital area
If obstruction has occurred, external drainage and
secondary dacryocystorhinostomy is required
93.
94.
95. Central third of the upper midfacial skeleton
Medial orbital walls
The nasal process of the frontal bone,the frontal
process of the maxilla, and the thick upper portions
of the nasal bones
Posteriorly- the frontal process of the maxilla, the
thinner lacrimal bone, and the delicate lamina
papyracea
96. The anterior ethmoidal foramen is situated
along the upper border of the lamina
papyracea and transmits the nasociliary nerve
and the anterior ethmoidal vessels
The posterior ethmoidal foramen gives
passage to the posterior ethmoidal nerves and
vessels which rupture in significant
nasoethmoidal-orbital fractures and is one of
the causes of significant orbital hematoma
97. Medial posterior portion of the medial orbital
wall
Body of the sphenoid, immediately in front of the
optic foramen
In severe skeletal disruption, the fracture lines
involve the optic foramen and superior orbital fissure
producing shearing of nerve fibers or a disturbance
of circulation to the optic nerve or a pressure injury to
the nerve, which might result in blindness
98. Area between the orbits and below the floor of
the anterior cranial fossa
Contains
Two ethmoidal labyrinths
Superior and middle turbinates
Median thicker plate of septal bone
Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid
Roughly pear shaped in transverse section,
being wider in the middle than in the posterior
portion
99. Relations
Above by the cribriform plate in the midline and by
the roof of each ethmoidal mass on the sides
Below at the level of the horizontal line through the
lower border of the ethmoidal labyrinths
Laterally, medial wall of the orbit
Anteriorly, the frontal process of the maxilla and the
nasal process and spine of the frontal bone
Divided into two approximately equal halves by the
nasal septum
100. A pyramid with a median partition
Inferior wall, or floor of the frontal sinus
Roof of the orbit
Thinnest portion of the frontal sinus
Anterior wall
Thickest
Compact and some cancellous bone
Posterior wall
Is thinner than the anterior wall
Almost entirely of compact bone, which separates
the sinus from the frontal lobe
101. The nasofrontal ducts descend from the posterior
inferior portion of the sinus to middle turbinate of
the nose
Size, shape, and septation vary greatly
May occupy most of the frontal bone or only a small
portion of the lower central portion
The two sides are usually strikingly asymmetric
May be the size of an ethmoid cell or may be
pneumatizing the entire frontal bone and roof of the orbits
Always larger on one side than on the other
Occasionally, one or both frontal sinuses may be absent
Contains highly variable partial and complete septa.
102. Pyramidal or cuboidal in shape
3.5 to 5 cm long and 1.5 to 2.5 cm wide
Cellular in structure
8 to 10 cells with thin lamellar walls
Divided into anterior and posterior sections
Drain into the middle meatus of the nose
103.
104. A typical cause is a blunt impact over the upper
portion of the bridge of the nose by a blunt object,
striking the nasofrontal area and crushing injury
with comminuted fractures is produced
Orbital roof, the interorbital space, and the
perpendicular plate of the ethmoid are frequently
involved
The anterior cranial fossa may be fractured or
penetrated
May also involve the roofs of the ethmoid sinuses
and the lateral walls of the ethmoid sinuses
105. Neurologic complications
Laceration of the dura covering the frontal lobes
Laceration of the tubular sheaths enveloping the
olfactory nerves
Contusion or severance of the nerves as they
perforate the cribriform plate
Penetration of the brain by sharp-edged ethmoidal or
frontal cell walls
Blunt contusion of brain tissue
106. Splintering of the lamina papyracea facilitates
an enlarged blowout fracture
Lacerations may sever the levator palpebrae
superioris or penetrate through the medial
canthal ligament and lacrimal system
Less commonly, the medial canthal tendon
may be avulsed from bone with its contained
lacrimal system
107. Unilateral (36%) or bilateral (64%)
The unilateral type-
Upper le fort II or III injuries or in fractures involving
the frontal area progressing into the nasoethmoidal
region
Also involves the zygoma and the medial inferior
orbit.
108. Produced by two types of backward and lateral
displacement
First type
The frontal process of the maxilla and the nasal
bones penetrate the interorbital space, comminuting
the ethmoidal cells and outfracturing the medial walls
of the orbit
Medial canthal tendon attachments are displaced
with the bone, and the medial canthi are displaced
laterally
109. In the second
More common type
Nasal bones and the frontal process of the maxilla
are splayed outward and projected backward into the
medial portion of the orbital cavity along the lateral
surface of the medial orbital wall
The medial canthal tendon usually is not severed
from bone, nor is the lacrimal or canalicular system
transected in the absence of cutaneous lacerations
Traumatic telecanthus contributed to an increase in
the thickness of the medial orbital wall from the
overlapping bone fragments
110. TYPE DESCRIPTION
I Incomplete fracture, mostly unilateral, displaced only inferiorly at the
infraorbital rim and piriform margin
II Section the entire nasoethmoidal area as a unit, telecanthus
doesnot occur, rotated and posteriorly displaced, and considerable
canthal distortion occurs
III Comminuted nasoethmoidal fractures with the fractures remaining
outside the canthal ligament insertion
IV Either have avulsion of the canthal ligament (uncommon) or extend
underneath the canthal ligament insertion
111.
112. Nose flattened and appear to have been
pushed between the eyes
Loss of dorsal nasal prominence
Obtuse angle is noted between the lip and
columella
The medial canthal areas are swollen and
distorted with palpebral and subconjunctival
hematomas
Ecchymosis and subconjunctival hemorrhage
113. Crepitus present directly over the medial canthal
ligaments
Bimanual examination of the medial orbital rim
Performed by placement of a palpating finger deeply over
the canthal ligament and a clamp inside the nose with its
tip directly under the finger. The frontal process of the
maxilla may then, if it is fractured, be moved between the
index finger and the clamp, indicating instability
Confirms both the diagnosis and the need for an open
reduction
If the clamp is placed under the nasal bones, it
erroneously identifies a nasal fracture as canthal
instability.
114. Intranasal examination
Swollen, bulging mucosa with fractures of the septum
suggested by its displacement, swollen mucous
membranes, and septal hematoma
Septal hematomas should be specifically searched for
Often accompanied by the signs of bilateral
orbital blowout fractures or fractures of the
frontal bone, maxilla, and zygoma
115. If the patient is irritable, restless, or
unconscious or had a loss of consciousness, a
frontal brain injury should be suspected
CSF rhinorrhea, often masked by bloody
drainage, distinguished by the "double ring"
sign
When the degree of comminution of the
fracture is sufficient, the medial canthal
ligament and its attached frontal process of the
maxilla move laterally producing Telecanthus
116. Plain radiographs
often mask the fractures
critical details obscured and always incomplete
CT scan shows fractures of
frontal process of the maxilla
nose
medial and inferior orbital rims
medial orbital wall and orbital floor
117. Fractures of the anterior cranial fossa difficult to
detect in the ordinary axial CT section, especially if
displacement is minimal
Air in the subdural or extradural space or rarely in a
ventricle is a sign of communication of the intracranial
area with the nasal cavity or sinuses
Fractures of the frontal sinus
Depression of the anterior or posterior walls of the frontal
sinus
Air-fluid level implying nasofrontal duct obstruction
Displacement of either the anterior wall alone or the
anterior and posterior walls of the sinus may be observed.
118. Fragmentation and a "buckled" appearance of
the cribriform plate- penetration of bone
fragments toward the base of the brain
Brain tissue in the nose may also be seen,
which is an indication for neurosurgical
intervention
119. Brain trauma should always be suspected
Neurosurgical intervention is required in
patients who have depressed or open frontal
skull or cranial base fractures
neurologic examination must assess the level
of consciousness, motor response, eye
movements, and response to questions
120. CSF leak must be assumed in any patient with
a nasoethmoidal-orbital fracture