Write a report on the application of population health improvement i.docxarnoldmeredith47041
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvements in the safety and quality of care? How?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting raise any particular ethical .
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docxarnoldmeredith47041
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Competency Map
Use this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Questions to ConsiderAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvemen.
Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to imp.docxbradburgess22840
Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.
Note
: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high quality outcomes.
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
CONTEXT:
As a master's-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, st.
[INSERT TITLE HERE] 7BUS 499 Module 1 Homework AssignmentPa.docxhanneloremccaffery
[INSERT TITLE HERE] 7
BUS 499: Module 1 Homework Assignment
Part I
Directions: For this first week, you will work on a draft. It may change during the course of this class, but do your best and start with a business problem that you find interesting. It may be in your field or it may be interesting in another way. Begin to narrow the choices that you selected in the Check Your Understanding.
Submit the following:
The working title of your topic.
Two to three paragraphs describing the topic and the rationale for choosing the topic. Use the 8 steps to outline your ideas.
A preliminary list of 10 to 15 resources, composed exclusively of titles and URLs.
One paragraph with your initial ideas for how you will conduct the research for this topic. Discuss the applicability of Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method research methods. How could you apply each one? Which one seems best at this time to use for your proposal? Begin to narrow down the selection you might use for your proposal.
Note: Before submitting your final topic, please confer with your faculty advisor about your choice and options for a topic and get his or her input. The sooner you submit your topic to your advisor, the sooner you can begin your research on the topic.
Part II
Directions: Please fill in the areas shaded in blue.
Exercise I: Developing a research instrument
QUANTITATIVE STUDIES
Now that you have gone through all the chapters that constitute Step I of the research process, this exercise provides you with an opportunity to apply that knowledge to formulate a research problem that is of interest to you. As you know, selecting a research problem is one of the most important aspects of social research, so this exercise will, therefore, help you in formulating your research problem by raising questions and issues that will guide you to examine critically various facets and implications of what you are proposing to study. The exercise is designed to provide a directional framework that guides you through the problem formulation path. Keep in mind that the questions and issues raised in this exercise are not prescriptive but indicative and directional; hence you need to be critical and innovative while working through them. Thinking through a research problem with care can prevent a tremendous wastage of human and financial resources.
A research problem should be clearly stated and be specific in nature. The feasibility of the study in terms of the availability of technical expertise, finances, and time, and in terms of its relevance, should be considered thoroughly at the problem-formulation stage. In studies that attempt to establish a causal relationship or an association, the accuracy of the measurement of independent (cause) and dependent (effect) variables is of crucial importance and, hence, should be given serious consideration. If you have already selected a problem, you need not go through this process.
Start by identifying a broad area y.
Write a report on the application of population health improvement i.docxarnoldmeredith47041
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvements in the safety and quality of care? How?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting raise any particular ethical .
Write a report on the application of population health improve.docxarnoldmeredith47041
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Competency Map
Use this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Questions to ConsiderAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.
What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvemen.
Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to imp.docxbradburgess22840
Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.
Note
: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high quality outcomes.
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
CONTEXT:
As a master's-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, st.
[INSERT TITLE HERE] 7BUS 499 Module 1 Homework AssignmentPa.docxhanneloremccaffery
[INSERT TITLE HERE] 7
BUS 499: Module 1 Homework Assignment
Part I
Directions: For this first week, you will work on a draft. It may change during the course of this class, but do your best and start with a business problem that you find interesting. It may be in your field or it may be interesting in another way. Begin to narrow the choices that you selected in the Check Your Understanding.
Submit the following:
The working title of your topic.
Two to three paragraphs describing the topic and the rationale for choosing the topic. Use the 8 steps to outline your ideas.
A preliminary list of 10 to 15 resources, composed exclusively of titles and URLs.
One paragraph with your initial ideas for how you will conduct the research for this topic. Discuss the applicability of Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Method research methods. How could you apply each one? Which one seems best at this time to use for your proposal? Begin to narrow down the selection you might use for your proposal.
Note: Before submitting your final topic, please confer with your faculty advisor about your choice and options for a topic and get his or her input. The sooner you submit your topic to your advisor, the sooner you can begin your research on the topic.
Part II
Directions: Please fill in the areas shaded in blue.
Exercise I: Developing a research instrument
QUANTITATIVE STUDIES
Now that you have gone through all the chapters that constitute Step I of the research process, this exercise provides you with an opportunity to apply that knowledge to formulate a research problem that is of interest to you. As you know, selecting a research problem is one of the most important aspects of social research, so this exercise will, therefore, help you in formulating your research problem by raising questions and issues that will guide you to examine critically various facets and implications of what you are proposing to study. The exercise is designed to provide a directional framework that guides you through the problem formulation path. Keep in mind that the questions and issues raised in this exercise are not prescriptive but indicative and directional; hence you need to be critical and innovative while working through them. Thinking through a research problem with care can prevent a tremendous wastage of human and financial resources.
A research problem should be clearly stated and be specific in nature. The feasibility of the study in terms of the availability of technical expertise, finances, and time, and in terms of its relevance, should be considered thoroughly at the problem-formulation stage. In studies that attempt to establish a causal relationship or an association, the accuracy of the measurement of independent (cause) and dependent (effect) variables is of crucial importance and, hence, should be given serious consideration. If you have already selected a problem, you need not go through this process.
Start by identifying a broad area y.
Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case PresentationPsychiatric notesShainaBoling829
Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case Presentation
Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect them to the didactic learning you gain from your NRNP courses. Focused SOAP notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last three weeks, using the Focused SOAP Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient. To Prepare
· Create a Focused SOAP Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided to serve as a guide to assignment expectations.
PleaseNote:
· Based on your SOAP note of this patient, develop a case study presentation.
· Include at least five scholarly resources to support your assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning.
The Assignment
The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.
In your presentation:
· Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.
· Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
· Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:
·
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
·
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
·
Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with
DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.
·
Plan: describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based pr ...
During this assignment, you will be asked to discuss the concepttawnan2hsurra
During this assignment, you will be asked to discuss the concepts of health promotion and disease prevention, relating this information to the role of the APRN and applying it to the vulnerable population you selected during Week 1. In Week 6, you submitted a rough draft of your paper and received feedback from faculty, so please make sure you incorporate those comments along with direction you received from SmartThinking, Pearson Writing Center, and the Library.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Population-Specific Paper
This paper was to be developed throughout the first six to nine weeks of the course, with an opportunity to submit a rough draft for feedback during Week 6 and your final submission due this week, in Week 10. The goal of this assignment is twofold: 1) for you to demonstrate an understanding of the key concepts of health promotion and disease prevention as related to the role of the APRN while applying this information to a specific vulnerable population; and 2) for you to have an opportunity to develop your writing and APA formatting skills through faculty feedback and the utilization of various tools here at Regis (that is, Regis Library and staff, SmartThinking, Pearson Writing Center, etc.).
The faculty at Regis want you to be successful. Being able to present not only your thoughts but evidence-based practice information in a concise, systematic, and clear manner will be a talent that serves you well.
The paper is to be five to eight pages in length, not including the title page, attachments, and reference pages.
The paper will be divided into four sections.
Section 1 (Content can be found in Week 1)
Introduction
WHO’s definition of health
Concepts of health, health promotion, and behavior change options
Vulnerable individuals and populations
Historical Perspectives of Health
Healthy People Initiative – overall summary of the initiative
Levels of Prevention
Primordial
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Quaternary
The role of nursing, specifically APRNs, in health promotion and disease prevention
Section 2 (Content can be found in Week 2 and 3)
Vulnerability as a concept
Health disparities
Cultural competency as a provider
Defining resilience and applying to the vulnerable
Advocacy role as a provider
Vulnerable people, groups, populations, and societal views: Sinner versus victim (Mechanic and Tanner, 2005)
Section 3 (Content can be found in Week 2 through 4. Don’t forget to use the media/website/video links, as they will provide a lot of great information). Focus on your specific vulnerable population group
Introduce your vulnerable population: sinner or victim?
Social justice related to your population
Low literacy within your population and how this affects their health
Evaluate your vulnerable population related to current Healthy People Initiative guidelines.
Discuss one primary health concern for your population and include the preventive guidel ...
Orientations. Case Study Part 1.My questionPICOT (PICO) QuAlleneMcclendon878
Orientations. Case Study Part 1.
My question
PICOT (PICO) Question
PICOT (PICO) Question
For asymptomatic urethral and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection, would periodically screening of sex workers be beneficial to reduce incidence and prevalence rates at community level when compared to communities without intervention in a period of six months.
· 1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction". (1 paragraph).
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
2. Describe the vulnerable population. (1-2 paragraph).
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2, one of those two should be systematic review supporting what you wish to accomplish) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraph, one for each article).
After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found and how this evidence supports your ideas.
4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. (1-2 paragraph).
For this assignment a conclusion paragraph is not required.
Paper Requirements
Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)
Follow APA format
Cite a minimum of five research articles, including the two sources you will use as body of evidence in the literature search, in point 3.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.
Assignment rubric
Case Study Part II
[100 Points Total]
A. Project Content
90 points possible
0
1
2
3
4
Score
1. Describe the health problem.
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a
problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measureable
Did not identified the problem
Poorly identified the problem and aspect to address
Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
2. Describe the vulnerable population.
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
Did not identified or described population supported by evidence.
Poorly identified or described population supported by evidence.
Vaguely identified or described population s ...
Second topic
English 1302 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The final project is the creation of a grant proposal.
The assessment for this course will be the construction of a grant proposal that targets a current need. The overall assessme nt will
demonstrate your ability not only to conduct research, but to think critically. Specifically, the paper will examine your ability to
address the following:
• Explanation of issues: Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively,
delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding
• Evidence: Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive
analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
• Influence of context and assumptions: Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the
relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
• Your position: Specific position is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are
acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within position.
• Conclusions and related outcomes: Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect your informed
evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
The project will be broken up into different sections throughout the semester and at the end you will combine each section in to one
complete paper.
Some examples of grant proposal ideas have included:
• An elementary school has over 50 at-risk-students with behavior issues who are at risk with learning. This directly affects their
ability for future success in school. A grant was submitted to support the development of a music program directly targeting
the lessons being taught to improve memory.
• The implementation of logotherapy with failing high school students to improve behavior and help change the attitude of these
students.
This project is divided into four parts, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure
quality final submissions. These different parts are: Problem Identification, Literature Review, Justification, and the creation of a
PowerPoint Presentation to be submitted during finals week.
Prompt
The grant proposal will contain the critical elements listed below.
I. Problem Identification: Research and identify resources for a specific issue that needs to be corrected (3 -4 pages). The
issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant
information necessary for full understanding.
a. Prevalence: Determine a necessary program or service by examining current needs.
i. What is the issue you have chosen to address? Who is affected? What data do you have that points to the
prevalence of this issue.
For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for.docxtemplestewart19
For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a culture of ownership and shared responsibility (Berkow et al., 2012). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.
You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Reference
Berkow, S., Workman, J., Aronson, S., Stewart, J., Virkstis, K., & Kahn, M. (2012). Strengthening frontline nurse investment in organizational goals.
JONA: The Journal .
Assessment 2 Instructions Needs Analysis for ChangeTop of Form.docxrobert345678
Assessment 2 Instructions: Needs Analysis for Change
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
·
PRINT
·
Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Background and Context
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Instructions
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:
· Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
1. Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
· Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
2. Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
· Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
3. For example, if your implementati.
Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case PresentationPsychiatric notesShainaBoling829
Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case Presentation
Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect them to the didactic learning you gain from your NRNP courses. Focused SOAP notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last three weeks, using the Focused SOAP Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient. To Prepare
· Create a Focused SOAP Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided to serve as a guide to assignment expectations.
PleaseNote:
· Based on your SOAP note of this patient, develop a case study presentation.
· Include at least five scholarly resources to support your assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning.
The Assignment
The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.
In your presentation:
· Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.
· Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
· Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:
·
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
·
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
·
Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with
DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.
·
Plan: describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based pr ...
During this assignment, you will be asked to discuss the concepttawnan2hsurra
During this assignment, you will be asked to discuss the concepts of health promotion and disease prevention, relating this information to the role of the APRN and applying it to the vulnerable population you selected during Week 1. In Week 6, you submitted a rough draft of your paper and received feedback from faculty, so please make sure you incorporate those comments along with direction you received from SmartThinking, Pearson Writing Center, and the Library.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Population-Specific Paper
This paper was to be developed throughout the first six to nine weeks of the course, with an opportunity to submit a rough draft for feedback during Week 6 and your final submission due this week, in Week 10. The goal of this assignment is twofold: 1) for you to demonstrate an understanding of the key concepts of health promotion and disease prevention as related to the role of the APRN while applying this information to a specific vulnerable population; and 2) for you to have an opportunity to develop your writing and APA formatting skills through faculty feedback and the utilization of various tools here at Regis (that is, Regis Library and staff, SmartThinking, Pearson Writing Center, etc.).
The faculty at Regis want you to be successful. Being able to present not only your thoughts but evidence-based practice information in a concise, systematic, and clear manner will be a talent that serves you well.
The paper is to be five to eight pages in length, not including the title page, attachments, and reference pages.
The paper will be divided into four sections.
Section 1 (Content can be found in Week 1)
Introduction
WHO’s definition of health
Concepts of health, health promotion, and behavior change options
Vulnerable individuals and populations
Historical Perspectives of Health
Healthy People Initiative – overall summary of the initiative
Levels of Prevention
Primordial
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Quaternary
The role of nursing, specifically APRNs, in health promotion and disease prevention
Section 2 (Content can be found in Week 2 and 3)
Vulnerability as a concept
Health disparities
Cultural competency as a provider
Defining resilience and applying to the vulnerable
Advocacy role as a provider
Vulnerable people, groups, populations, and societal views: Sinner versus victim (Mechanic and Tanner, 2005)
Section 3 (Content can be found in Week 2 through 4. Don’t forget to use the media/website/video links, as they will provide a lot of great information). Focus on your specific vulnerable population group
Introduce your vulnerable population: sinner or victim?
Social justice related to your population
Low literacy within your population and how this affects their health
Evaluate your vulnerable population related to current Healthy People Initiative guidelines.
Discuss one primary health concern for your population and include the preventive guidel ...
Orientations. Case Study Part 1.My questionPICOT (PICO) QuAlleneMcclendon878
Orientations. Case Study Part 1.
My question
PICOT (PICO) Question
PICOT (PICO) Question
For asymptomatic urethral and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection, would periodically screening of sex workers be beneficial to reduce incidence and prevalence rates at community level when compared to communities without intervention in a period of six months.
· 1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction". (1 paragraph).
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
2. Describe the vulnerable population. (1-2 paragraph).
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2, one of those two should be systematic review supporting what you wish to accomplish) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraph, one for each article).
After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found and how this evidence supports your ideas.
4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. (1-2 paragraph).
For this assignment a conclusion paragraph is not required.
Paper Requirements
Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)
Follow APA format
Cite a minimum of five research articles, including the two sources you will use as body of evidence in the literature search, in point 3.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.
Assignment rubric
Case Study Part II
[100 Points Total]
A. Project Content
90 points possible
0
1
2
3
4
Score
1. Describe the health problem.
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a
problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measureable
Did not identified the problem
Poorly identified the problem and aspect to address
Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
2. Describe the vulnerable population.
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
Did not identified or described population supported by evidence.
Poorly identified or described population supported by evidence.
Vaguely identified or described population s ...
Second topic
English 1302 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The final project is the creation of a grant proposal.
The assessment for this course will be the construction of a grant proposal that targets a current need. The overall assessme nt will
demonstrate your ability not only to conduct research, but to think critically. Specifically, the paper will examine your ability to
address the following:
• Explanation of issues: Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively,
delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding
• Evidence: Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive
analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
• Influence of context and assumptions: Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the
relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
• Your position: Specific position is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are
acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within position.
• Conclusions and related outcomes: Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect your informed
evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
The project will be broken up into different sections throughout the semester and at the end you will combine each section in to one
complete paper.
Some examples of grant proposal ideas have included:
• An elementary school has over 50 at-risk-students with behavior issues who are at risk with learning. This directly affects their
ability for future success in school. A grant was submitted to support the development of a music program directly targeting
the lessons being taught to improve memory.
• The implementation of logotherapy with failing high school students to improve behavior and help change the attitude of these
students.
This project is divided into four parts, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure
quality final submissions. These different parts are: Problem Identification, Literature Review, Justification, and the creation of a
PowerPoint Presentation to be submitted during finals week.
Prompt
The grant proposal will contain the critical elements listed below.
I. Problem Identification: Research and identify resources for a specific issue that needs to be corrected (3 -4 pages). The
issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant
information necessary for full understanding.
a. Prevalence: Determine a necessary program or service by examining current needs.
i. What is the issue you have chosen to address? Who is affected? What data do you have that points to the
prevalence of this issue.
For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for.docxtemplestewart19
For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a culture of ownership and shared responsibility (Berkow et al., 2012). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.
You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Reference
Berkow, S., Workman, J., Aronson, S., Stewart, J., Virkstis, K., & Kahn, M. (2012). Strengthening frontline nurse investment in organizational goals.
JONA: The Journal .
Assessment 2 Instructions Needs Analysis for ChangeTop of Form.docxrobert345678
Assessment 2 Instructions: Needs Analysis for Change
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
·
PRINT
·
Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Background and Context
As a master's-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.
Instructions
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:
· Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
1. Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
· Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
2. Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
· Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
3. For example, if your implementati.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients Discussion.docx
1. FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients Discussion
FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients DiscussionFPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer
Patients DiscussionSummarize 3-5 Summarize 3-5 sources that address the target
population in your PICOT question. Then, synthesize the evidence from these sources into
one paragraph in of the target population.INTRODUCTIONSuccessful academic writing
requires the interpretation and synthesis of scholarly sources in of ideas, projects, or
additional scholarship. In this assessment, you will progress from summary to synthesis,
using the sources you have gathered to the target population of your project. This
assessment focuses on crafting an argument in of the selection of the target population
identified in your PICOT question. Complete this assessment before beginning Assessment
7.DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCYBy successfully completing this assessment, you will
demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment
scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text,
incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.Integrate
evidence into text appropriately.Competency 2: Craft a compelling argument.Compose a
strong thesis stating an argument.Explain how evidence s an argument.Competency 3:
Create a literature review that s a possible intervention or process change.Develop a
synthesis of evidence in of an argument.Competency 4: Obtain preceptor and practicum
approval.FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients Discussion Explain why the proposed
intervention does not pose any risk to human subjects.ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED,
PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSPREPARATIONGather 3–5 sources you have found ing your
argument that there is a need in the target population and that the intervention identified in
your PICOT question will meet the need. The following are things you should identify when
considering your population (not an exhaustive list and not all the items on this list might
apply to your population): age, generation, sociocultural determinants, geographic area,
gender, and ethnicity.Review the resources on summarizing.Review the steps in the MEAL
Plan.Use the Synthesis module for an introduction to synthesis.The target population will be
the subject(s) undergoing the change in practice or process, and they will be key
stakeholders in your intervention. Make sure that you have not identified a vulnerable
population. Refer to the Programs of Research, to ensure that your intervention does not
pose any risk to human subjects. Your intervention should involve a quality improvement or
process improvement that implements an evidence-based practice.INSTRUCTIONSNote:
The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent
assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your instructor’s feedback on
2. earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering
and integrating your instructor’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded,
resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.State your PICOT question, including the
target population. Gather 3–5 resources that address the topic. Write the following:For each
source, write a summary paragraph.Then, create one synthesized paragraph of information,
bringing together the information from all the sources.FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer
Patients Discussion Here are some questions to consider when writing this final paragraph,
which will be a synthesis in of the target population.How do your sources relate?In what
ways are they similar or different?How do they build upon one another?Each paragraph
should present a main idea, ed by evidence, following the model set by the MEAL Plan.Your
assessment will be graded according to the following criteria:Explain why the proposed
intervention does not pose any risk to human subjects.Capella IRB requires learners to
ensure that volunteers/participants in doctoral projects will not experience negative
impacts to their social reputation, financial standing, employability, legal status, educational
opportunities, or health.Describe the characteristics of the project stakeholders who will
participate in the change.Explain the impact of the project on the stakeholders. How will the
change in practice or process meet the needs of said stakeholders and/or the
organization?Describe, if any, the potential negative impacts the project may have on the
stakeholders or organization.Integrate evidence into text appropriately.Compose a strong
thesis stating an argument.Explain how the evidence s an argument.Develop a synthesis of
evidence in of an argument.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTSAPA Format: Citations and
references follow current Evidence and APA.urces that address the target population in
your PICOT question. Then, synthesize the evidence from these sources into one paragraph
in of the target population.INTRODUCTIONSuccessful academic writing requires the
interpretation and synthesis of scholarly sources in of ideas, projects, or additional
scholarship. In this assessment, you will progress from summary to synthesis, using the
sources you have gathered to the target population of your project. This assessment
focuses on crafting an argument in of the selection of the target population identified in
your PICOT question. Complete this assessment before beginning Assessment 7. FPX 8045
Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients DiscussionDEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCYBy
successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the
course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency
1: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate
evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.Integrate evidence into text
appropriately.Competency 2: Craft a compelling argument.Compose a strong thesis stating
an argument.Explain how evidence s an argument.Competency 3: Create a literature
review that s a possible intervention or process change.Develop a synthesis of evidence in
of an argument.Competency 4: Obtain preceptor and practicum approval.Explain why the
proposed intervention does not pose any risk to human subjects.PREPARATIONGather 3–5
sources you have found ing your argument that there is a need in the target population and
that the intervention identified in your PICOT question will meet the need. The following
are things you should identify when considering your population (not an exhaustive list and
not all the items on this list might apply to your population): age, generation, sociocultural
3. determinants, geographic area, gender, and ethnicity.Review the resources on
summarizing.Review the steps in the MEAL Plan.Use the Synthesis module for an
introduction to synthesis.The target population will be the subject(s) undergoing the
change in practice or process, and they will be key stakeholders in your intervention. Make
sure that you have not identified a vulnerable population. Refer to the Programs of
Research, to ensure that your intervention does not pose any risk to human subjects. Your
intervention should involve a quality improvement or process improvement that
implements an evidence-based practice. FPX 8045 Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Patients
Discussion