First Summarize the research what is the.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
The research study aimed to examine the relationship between exercise and depression. The researchers hypothesized that regular exercise would be associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms. Participants completed surveys about their exercise habits and depression levels, allowing the researchers to analyze whether more frequent exercise correlated with less depression. The authors concluded that their findings supported the hypothesis, with greater amounts of exercise linked to fewer depressive symptoms.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Share research Questionnaires for thesis
This document outlines questions to consider when writing different sections of a research paper, including the introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. For each section, 3-6 questions are provided to guide content and structure. Examples include questions about the paper's thesis, sources used, data collection and analysis methods, presentation of results, interpretation of findings, limitations, and importance/implications. Considering these questions can help ensure all necessary components are addressed for each section of a research paper.
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx
1
Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing.
The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar.
The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles.
Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article.
Link to peer reviewed article one:
http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341
1) APA reference for article #1
2)Introductionand core study elements
· Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed.
· Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)?
· What were the research questions?
· What were the key findings and conclusions of the study?
3) Evaluate literature reviewed
· Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing?
4) Evaluate theoretical framework
· What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study?
5) Evaluate methods
· What research method and designs are used in this study?
· How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)?
· Do the m ...
Educational research introduction
This document provides an overview of the main components of an educational research project, including the statement of the problem, research questions, literature review, methodology, analysis, conclusions, and implications. It discusses the purpose statement, theoretical framework, strategies of inquiry (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods), data collection and analysis. The document also outlines the first steps for developing an educational research project, including identifying a problem, choosing a worldview, selecting a methodology, and generating initial keywords for the literature review.
Research seminar lecture_7_criteria_good_research
This document provides an overview and review of key aspects of educational research. It discusses what educational research is and the main types of research. It outlines the typical steps in conducting research, including identifying a research problem, conducting a literature review, developing research questions and hypotheses, identifying needed data, data collection methods, data analysis, findings, discussion, and conclusions. Good research is defined as having a sound rationale, clear aims, a relevant theoretical basis, well-defined research questions, an appropriate methodology, contributions to the field, and consistency between all steps. Typical mistakes include having too much background and too little on the specific current research, as well as weaknesses in feasibility or scope.
Introduction to Thesis
This document provides an overview of the requirements and process for writing a Master's thesis. It discusses defining research, identifying a problem, selecting a research problem, conducting a literature review, and issues to consider when reading papers. The key points are:
- A thesis requires 12 credits and a published 11 page manuscript. It must follow the Graduate School's guidelines.
- Research involves systematically studying a field to establish facts or principles.
- Problems can come from work, literature, discussions, or courses and must be interesting, urgent, useful, within one's abilities, unique, and feasible.
- Literature reviews examine if a research question was already answered and help identify gaps. Useful websites include Google Scholar and PubMed
Writing a research proposal: Key chapters Explanation
These slides are about to write a proposal for research work. It is very handy and first hand information.
Viva questions
The document contains questions that were obtained by the author while attending doctoral school in 2002/2003. The questions cover several topics related to conducting PhD research including: the background and motivation for undertaking a PhD; developing the research question and theoretical framework; choosing a research methodology; conducting fieldwork and data analysis; presenting research results; and evaluating the value and limitations of the research. The questions provide a guide for PhD students to help structure their research and prepare for their thesis defense.
8 1 proposal-guidelines-qualitative-reserach
This document provides guidelines for writing qualitative research proposals. It outlines the key sections that should be included, such as the statement of the problem, literature review, methods, and work plan. The guidelines emphasize that qualitative research is emergent in nature, so the proposal should describe how the researcher plans to engage in an emergent process and keep their committee informed of any changes that occur during the research. It also stresses the importance of conducting a pilot study to help refine the research questions and design before beginning the formal research project.
Recommended
Share research Questionnaires for thesis
This document outlines questions to consider when writing different sections of a research paper, including the introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. For each section, 3-6 questions are provided to guide content and structure. Examples include questions about the paper's thesis, sources used, data collection and analysis methods, presentation of results, interpretation of findings, limitations, and importance/implications. Considering these questions can help ensure all necessary components are addressed for each section of a research paper.
1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx
1
Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography
As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing.
The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar.
The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles.
Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article.
Link to peer reviewed article one:
http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341
1) APA reference for article #1
2)Introductionand core study elements
· Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed.
· Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)?
· What were the research questions?
· What were the key findings and conclusions of the study?
3) Evaluate literature reviewed
· Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing?
4) Evaluate theoretical framework
· What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study?
5) Evaluate methods
· What research method and designs are used in this study?
· How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)?
· Do the m ...
Educational research introduction
This document provides an overview of the main components of an educational research project, including the statement of the problem, research questions, literature review, methodology, analysis, conclusions, and implications. It discusses the purpose statement, theoretical framework, strategies of inquiry (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods), data collection and analysis. The document also outlines the first steps for developing an educational research project, including identifying a problem, choosing a worldview, selecting a methodology, and generating initial keywords for the literature review.
Research seminar lecture_7_criteria_good_research
This document provides an overview and review of key aspects of educational research. It discusses what educational research is and the main types of research. It outlines the typical steps in conducting research, including identifying a research problem, conducting a literature review, developing research questions and hypotheses, identifying needed data, data collection methods, data analysis, findings, discussion, and conclusions. Good research is defined as having a sound rationale, clear aims, a relevant theoretical basis, well-defined research questions, an appropriate methodology, contributions to the field, and consistency between all steps. Typical mistakes include having too much background and too little on the specific current research, as well as weaknesses in feasibility or scope.
Introduction to Thesis
This document provides an overview of the requirements and process for writing a Master's thesis. It discusses defining research, identifying a problem, selecting a research problem, conducting a literature review, and issues to consider when reading papers. The key points are:
- A thesis requires 12 credits and a published 11 page manuscript. It must follow the Graduate School's guidelines.
- Research involves systematically studying a field to establish facts or principles.
- Problems can come from work, literature, discussions, or courses and must be interesting, urgent, useful, within one's abilities, unique, and feasible.
- Literature reviews examine if a research question was already answered and help identify gaps. Useful websites include Google Scholar and PubMed
Writing a research proposal: Key chapters Explanation
These slides are about to write a proposal for research work. It is very handy and first hand information.
Viva questions
The document contains questions that were obtained by the author while attending doctoral school in 2002/2003. The questions cover several topics related to conducting PhD research including: the background and motivation for undertaking a PhD; developing the research question and theoretical framework; choosing a research methodology; conducting fieldwork and data analysis; presenting research results; and evaluating the value and limitations of the research. The questions provide a guide for PhD students to help structure their research and prepare for their thesis defense.
8 1 proposal-guidelines-qualitative-reserach
This document provides guidelines for writing qualitative research proposals. It outlines the key sections that should be included, such as the statement of the problem, literature review, methods, and work plan. The guidelines emphasize that qualitative research is emergent in nature, so the proposal should describe how the researcher plans to engage in an emergent process and keep their committee informed of any changes that occur during the research. It also stresses the importance of conducting a pilot study to help refine the research questions and design before beginning the formal research project.
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
This document provides information about preparing for and successfully completing a doctoral defense or viva voce exam. It begins with polling attendees on their stage in the dissertation process. It then outlines key criteria for evaluating dissertations, including what constitutes outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. Tips are provided for ensuring one's dissertation meets the evaluation standards, such as thoroughly revising and getting feedback. Common types of questions examiners may ask are listed, covering originality, methods, findings, implications, and future work. Finally, important questions for students to ask their examiners beforehand are discussed to reduce uncertainty about examiner expectations and outcomes.
1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
! 1
Running head: INFORMED CONSENT
RUA: Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
Student Name
Chamberlain University
Dr. Shakeeka Misher
11/29/18
INFORMED CONSENT !2
Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
In this section, you will discuss the problem and the focus of your group work, the
significance of the problem, health outcomes or statistics of the problem, present your PICOT
question, and include a purpose statement.
Description of Findings: Summary
Insert Matrix Table
Description of Findings: Description
In this section, you will discuss what concepts have been studied, methods utilized,
participants of the samples, any instruments utilized, reliability and validity, reflect back on the
purpose of your paper, and discuss recommendations. Ensure to identify two questions that can
help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion
Provide a one paragraph conclusion (3-5 sentences) regarding your paper.
INFORMED CONSENT !3
References
Ensure to place all references in APA format (include in-text citations within the paper).
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. doi: 10.1521533
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. Retrieved from www.journalofnursingineducation.com
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
Required Uniform Assignment: Analyzing Published Research
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4
and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based
practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE
Refer to the course calendar for due date information. The college’s Late Assignment policy applies to this
activity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
The paper will include the following.
1. Clinical question
a. Description of problem
b. Significance of problem
c. Purpose of paper
2. Description of findings
a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methods used
iii. Participants
iv. Instruments including reliability and validity
v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group
3. Conclusion of paper
4. Format
a. Correct grammar and spelling
b. Use of headings for each section
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
c. Use of APA format (sixth edition)
d. Page length: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
2. Paper should include a title page and a reference pa.
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document provides instructions for an independent study project on research methods in sociology. Students will be assigned one research method from a list to create a resource on, covering how it is used, strengths, weaknesses, ethical issues, examples in sociology and health, connections to sociological perspectives, and references. Resources can be presented through diagrams, charts, presentations or documents and will be shared with other students.
DATA EXTRACTION SHEETAuthorFirst author’s surnameDateYea.docx
DATA EXTRACTION SHEET
Author
First author’s surname
Date
Year of publication
Country of Origin
Location(s) of fieldwork
Study Purpose & Design
i.e. Aims and Objectives and design
Setting
Eg. Community, hospital, mixed, unstated
Participation
Sample size
Socio-demographic data
For eg,
Age:
Gender:
Ethnicity:
Comment if unstated
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Leave blank if not mentioned
Methodology/Method
Include both
Summary of findings/outcomes
Could use bullet points here
Personal Notes
Any other observations (eg. About relevance, application, ethics, equality and diversity).
Funding
Leave blank if not mentioned
Reference in full
Harvard style
Assignment guidance for Evidence Informed Practice Research - Assessment 1
Aims of the module
To introduce students to a range of research and evaluation methods relevant to social work.
To equip students with the skills to critically review relevant research evidence in relation to a selected area of social work practice.
Learning Outcomes
After completing the module the student should be able to:
LO1 Evaluate the evidence base for social work practice
LO2 Critically review the strengths and weaknesses of a range of research methods in
relation to social work
LO3 Critically evaluate and integrate research evidence from a range of sources related
to a specific area of social work practice
There are two parts to assessment of the module
Learning Outcomes of Assessment 1 of the module.
Learning Outcome of Assessment 2 (LO1) will be discussed at a later stage
The assessment 1 item list is assessed via the following learning outcomes listed:
LO2 Critically review the strengths and weaknesses of a range of research methods in
relation to social work
LO3 Critically evaluate and integrate research evidence from a range of sources related
to a specific area of social work practice
Assessment 1(80%): Critical evaluation of research study
The research study will be chosen by the student (agreed by the research tutor). It should bebased on a topic related to the final social work placement and follow the prescribed critical evaluation framework. A data extraction sheet (provided) should be included as part of the appendix. Additional references should be used to reflect wider reading around the context of the research and the body of knowledge around it. References should also be used to support discussions on areas such as research design, ethics and methodology. (2500 words and data extraction sheet). Please attach the research study to your critical evaluation.
Critical evaluation of research framework (as provided)
You should aim to respond to all the questions set out here in order to produce a good critical evaluation of your research study.
You are advised to structure this using the headings provided.
You should provide some relevant references (research methods, texts) where you can, e.g. in relation to research ethics, where you refer to the strengths and weaknesses of the r.
ENV 101Final Project GuidanceDraft ScaffoldA. INTRODUCTION.docx
ENV 101
Final Project Guidance
Draft Scaffold
A. INTRODUCTION
Why is this topic/question one that you wanted to ask?
Why is it important that we learn more about this topic/question?
My research question(s) is/are…
B. LITERATURE REVIEW:
What do we already know about this topic?
Topic 1:
Topic 2:
Topic 3:
Topic 4:
Topic 5:
C. METHOD
How are you collecting original data/information?
Why is that method the right one for the question you are asking?
Who are your participants?
How do you have access to your participants?
What questions are you asking them? OR In what ways are you modifying a behavior?
D. RESULTS
If you have some results already what are they?
If you don’t have results already, consider your questions or your actions, what do you expect to see?
How do you plan on displaying your results? (This might be a table, if you have multiple participants, it might be a written paragraph for each question that you ask, it might be a log of your behavior modification, day by day)
E. ANALYSIS AND INSIGHTS
What did your literature review tell you in answer to the research question that you asked?
What did your original data collection tell you in answer to your research question?
Did your original data collection support or correspond with what you found in your literature review?
What did you find challenging about you behavior modification, if that is what you did? How did your survey/interview participants struggle with the questions that you asked, if that was your method of data collection?
ENV 101
Introduction to Environmental Science
FINAL PROJECT
The learning objectives for this class are the following:
-understand the basic environmental processes that shape the natural world around them.
-evaluate the reciprocal relationship between human and environmental systems.
-consider environmental problems from both a global and a local perspective.
-understand the impact of human decisions on the natural environment (both positive and negative).
-understand some of the ways in which scientists gather information, as well as, analyze and communicate their findings.
Everything we did in class was aimed at improved your understanding and skill related to these learning objectives. I don’t want you all to leave as scientists, but I want you to be able to navigate scientific information related to environmental issues with some understanding and ability to take it apart and use it to make well-informed decisions.
The final project is designed to give you the opportunity to reflect the improvement in your understanding and skill and to consider your relationship to the environment. For this project, you will select a behavior that you engage in, that has an impact on the environment. This behavior will be the foundation of a research question that investigate and use to inform your perspective on this particular environmental beha ...
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidance on how to conduct a critical appraisal or critique of a research report. It emphasizes that a critique requires careful examination of all aspects of a study, including its methodology, analysis, and conclusions. The critique should objectively assess both the strengths and limitations of the research. Key aspects that should be evaluated include the study's design, sampling approach, data collection and analysis methods, and whether ethical standards were upheld. The critique aims to advance scientific knowledge by helping to identify ways future studies could be improved.
Tips and tricks in hand surgery research
The document provides tips for conducting successful clinical research. It discusses defining a worthy research problem or question, staying motivated throughout the research process, beginning with a literature review to understand the current knowledge in the area, and networking and collaborating with others. It also emphasizes maintaining organization through project management tools and time management.
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (httpwww.lib.uog.docx
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-critical-review)
Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review
Writing a critical review of a journal article can help to improve your research skills. By assessing the work of others, you develop skills as a critical reader and become familiar with the types of evaluation criteria that will be applied to research in your field and thus your own research.
You are expected to read the article carefully, analyse it, and evaluate the quality and originality of the research, as well as its relevance and presentation. Its strengths and weaknesses are assessed, followed by its overall value. Do not be confused by the term critique: it does not mean that you only look at the negative aspects of what the researcher has done. You should address both the positive and negative aspects.
If your lecturer has given you specific advice on how to write a critical review, follow that advice. If not, the following steps may help you. These steps are based on a detailed description of how to analyse and evaluate a research article provided by Wood (2003) in her lab guide.
This guide is divided into two parts. The first part, "Researching the Critique," outlines the steps involved in selecting and evaluating a research article. The second part, "Writing your Critique," discusses two possible ways to structure your critique paper.
A. Researching the Critique
The questions listed under many of the subheadings in this section may provide you with a good place to begin understanding what you are looking for and what form your critique might take.
1. Select a Topic
If your lecturer does not assign a topic or a particular article for you to review, and you must choose a topic yourself, try using a review article from your field. Review articles summarize and evaluate current studies (research articles) on a particular topic. Select a review article on a topic that interests you and that is written clearly so you can understand it.
2. Select a Research Article
Use the review article to select a research article. This can be very useful in writing your critique. The review article will provide background information for your analysis, as well as establishing that the research paper you are critiquing is significant: if the paper was not so highly regarded, it would not have been selected to be reviewed.
When choosing a research article, examine the Materials & Methods section closely and make sure you have a good grasp of the techniques and methods used. If you don't, you may have difficulty evaluating them.
3. Analyse the Text
Read the article(s) carefully. As you read the article(s) use the following questions to help you understand how and why the research was carried out.
· What is the author's central purpose? Look at INTRODUCTION.
· What methods were used to accomplish this purpose (systematic recor ...
Seven steps for framing and testing a research paper
I use the steps in this presentation to:
(i) test research ideas for research papers,
(ii) shape research papers, and
(iii) help draft the Introduction section of a research paper.
For each step I draft one or two concise paragraphs.
I then present and share these with co-authors, collaborators and colleagues to test the ideas and get feedback on how interesting and valid they are.
I consider and work through these steps several times during the life of a research paper framed.
Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline.docx
1. This document provides guidelines for critically appraising a quantitative research study and writing an assignment on it. Students are to select a study, preferably from a nursing journal, and critically evaluate it using the provided criteria.
2. The evaluation should address the research problem, literature review, framework, objectives, variables, methodology, measurements, data collection/analysis, results, and implications for nursing practice. A rubric is provided to guide the assignment.
3. Students will present their critique to the class, discussing aspects of the evaluation. The goal is to help students understand how to conduct a literature review and evidence-based practice, as well as gain knowledge from nursing research.
ROL.pptx
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. It discusses the purposes of a literature review, which include justifying the need for a research study and demonstrating knowledge of previous work. The document also outlines the key steps to writing a literature review, such as developing an organization and search strategy, analyzing sources, and structuring the review with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Surviving Your Viva or Dissertation Defense
This document provides guidance for post-graduate students preparing to defend their thesis or final project. It discusses variations in the defense process between countries and institutions. It also addresses how defenses are evaluated, the range of questions students may face, and tips for ensuring success. Key points include outlining standards for outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. It emphasizes the importance of internal consistency and addressing examiners' questions specifically for one's own university and research.
Research proposal writing
This presentation covers the basics of preparing a research proposal in Social Sciences.
A Malayalam video explaining this presentation can be accessed at https://youtu.be/acg9Y3mQs9A
Note: This is not suitable for preparing a proposal for research funding
Review roleija originalstudy
This document provides guidelines for peer reviewing original articles and clinical investigations submitted to the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. It outlines key areas to check such as headings, title, abstract, keywords, and main sections of the article including introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Reviewers are asked to check that appropriate approvals and consent were obtained, the study design and statistical analysis are sound, results are clearly presented, discussions are supported by citations, and references are formatted correctly. Guidelines also cover reviewing images, illustrations, videos andlegends.
Review roleija originalstudy 2
This document provides guidelines for peer reviewers to evaluate original articles submitted to the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. It includes a checklist of criteria to assess for various sections of the article like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Reviewers are asked to evaluate if the manuscript includes the necessary components for each section, follows ethical guidelines, and uses appropriate statistical analyses and language. The goal is to promote high-quality scientific writing while maintaining constructive feedback to authors.
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
This document provides guidance for students on completing their critical review and professional artefact assignments for the BA (Hons) programme. It discusses the structure and content required for the critical review, including an introduction, evaluation of the inquiry process, analysis of findings, and critical reflection. It also provides examples of how to analyze different types of data collected, such as observations, surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Finally, it addresses formatting requirements, use of citations and references, and responding to common student questions about distinguishing the critical review from the professional artefact.
Chapter 4, Conceptualizing A Research Study
Sample lecture from the DCT College of Liberal Arts.
Stay tuned to be updated on when is the next enrollment date and learn with us.
BAGAIMANA MENGENALPASTI PERMASALAHAN KAJIAN??
The document provides guidance on how to identify and define a research problem. It discusses the key elements of a research problem statement, including describing the ideal situation, current reality, and consequences of not addressing the problem. Some important sources of research problems are one's own experiences, deductions from theory, and gaps found in related literature. The problem statement should have a clear topic and be narrowed down through reviewing literature. Determining whether a problem is worth researching involves considering if it advances knowledge, contributes to practice, and fills gaps in existing research. The document outlines steps for writing a problem statement and differentiates a research problem from other aspects of a study like the topic, purpose, and research questions. It also compares quantitative and qualitative purpose statements
inventor who is currently living in Northeast Ohio and answer.docx
The document provides instructions for an assignment asking students to research an inventor currently living in Northeast Ohio. It lists 9 questions to answer about the inventor, including their name, invention, impact of the invention, benefits to the inventor, improvements over time, work background, funding sources, number of patents, and personal background details. Students are to include 2 references in APA format and not use 3 specific inventors for the assignment.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Despite efforts to improve patient safety, medical errors continue to occur. Some errors result in minor issues, while others can permanently alter or end a patient's life. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between caregivers. This document discusses analyzing a medical error or near miss to identify contributing factors, preventability, stakeholder impacts, team responsibilities, quality improvement measures taken, and proposed additional solutions to prevent similar incidents.
More Related Content
Similar to First Summarize the research what is the.docx
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
This document provides information about preparing for and successfully completing a doctoral defense or viva voce exam. It begins with polling attendees on their stage in the dissertation process. It then outlines key criteria for evaluating dissertations, including what constitutes outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. Tips are provided for ensuring one's dissertation meets the evaluation standards, such as thoroughly revising and getting feedback. Common types of questions examiners may ask are listed, covering originality, methods, findings, implications, and future work. Finally, important questions for students to ask their examiners beforehand are discussed to reduce uncertainty about examiner expectations and outcomes.
1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA
1
RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing
RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT,
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight)
You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization
(employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to
gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance.
Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of
Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3.
This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written
in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style.
HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1):
Title of your research
Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS)
Introduction/Background
Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be
interested in it.
Literature Review
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research.
The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography.
Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a
statement, back it up with a reference!
• Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital
format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you
might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15).
• Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own
subsection within the literature review.
• For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their
similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information.
State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study.
• Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research.
Statement of the Problem
Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain:
• How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research?
• What is the gap that will be addressed by this research?
• What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research?
• Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society.
Research Questions
Provide focused ...
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
! 1
Running head: INFORMED CONSENT
RUA: Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
Student Name
Chamberlain University
Dr. Shakeeka Misher
11/29/18
INFORMED CONSENT !2
Informed Consent Regarding Patient Safety
In this section, you will discuss the problem and the focus of your group work, the
significance of the problem, health outcomes or statistics of the problem, present your PICOT
question, and include a purpose statement.
Description of Findings: Summary
Insert Matrix Table
Description of Findings: Description
In this section, you will discuss what concepts have been studied, methods utilized,
participants of the samples, any instruments utilized, reliability and validity, reflect back on the
purpose of your paper, and discuss recommendations. Ensure to identify two questions that can
help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion
Provide a one paragraph conclusion (3-5 sentences) regarding your paper.
INFORMED CONSENT !3
References
Ensure to place all references in APA format (include in-text citations within the paper).
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. doi: 10.1521533
Misher, S. (2018). Evidence-based research in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing
Education, 8(1), 23-63. Retrieved from www.journalofnursingineducation.com
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
Required Uniform Assignment: Analyzing Published Research
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4
and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based
practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE
Refer to the course calendar for due date information. The college’s Late Assignment policy applies to this
activity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
The paper will include the following.
1. Clinical question
a. Description of problem
b. Significance of problem
c. Purpose of paper
2. Description of findings
a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methods used
iii. Participants
iv. Instruments including reliability and validity
v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group
3. Conclusion of paper
4. Format
a. Correct grammar and spelling
b. Use of headings for each section
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
c. Use of APA format (sixth edition)
d. Page length: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
2. Paper should include a title page and a reference pa.
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document provides instructions for an independent study project on research methods in sociology. Students will be assigned one research method from a list to create a resource on, covering how it is used, strengths, weaknesses, ethical issues, examples in sociology and health, connections to sociological perspectives, and references. Resources can be presented through diagrams, charts, presentations or documents and will be shared with other students.
DATA EXTRACTION SHEETAuthorFirst author’s surnameDateYea.docx
DATA EXTRACTION SHEET
Author
First author’s surname
Date
Year of publication
Country of Origin
Location(s) of fieldwork
Study Purpose & Design
i.e. Aims and Objectives and design
Setting
Eg. Community, hospital, mixed, unstated
Participation
Sample size
Socio-demographic data
For eg,
Age:
Gender:
Ethnicity:
Comment if unstated
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Leave blank if not mentioned
Methodology/Method
Include both
Summary of findings/outcomes
Could use bullet points here
Personal Notes
Any other observations (eg. About relevance, application, ethics, equality and diversity).
Funding
Leave blank if not mentioned
Reference in full
Harvard style
Assignment guidance for Evidence Informed Practice Research - Assessment 1
Aims of the module
To introduce students to a range of research and evaluation methods relevant to social work.
To equip students with the skills to critically review relevant research evidence in relation to a selected area of social work practice.
Learning Outcomes
After completing the module the student should be able to:
LO1 Evaluate the evidence base for social work practice
LO2 Critically review the strengths and weaknesses of a range of research methods in
relation to social work
LO3 Critically evaluate and integrate research evidence from a range of sources related
to a specific area of social work practice
There are two parts to assessment of the module
Learning Outcomes of Assessment 1 of the module.
Learning Outcome of Assessment 2 (LO1) will be discussed at a later stage
The assessment 1 item list is assessed via the following learning outcomes listed:
LO2 Critically review the strengths and weaknesses of a range of research methods in
relation to social work
LO3 Critically evaluate and integrate research evidence from a range of sources related
to a specific area of social work practice
Assessment 1(80%): Critical evaluation of research study
The research study will be chosen by the student (agreed by the research tutor). It should bebased on a topic related to the final social work placement and follow the prescribed critical evaluation framework. A data extraction sheet (provided) should be included as part of the appendix. Additional references should be used to reflect wider reading around the context of the research and the body of knowledge around it. References should also be used to support discussions on areas such as research design, ethics and methodology. (2500 words and data extraction sheet). Please attach the research study to your critical evaluation.
Critical evaluation of research framework (as provided)
You should aim to respond to all the questions set out here in order to produce a good critical evaluation of your research study.
You are advised to structure this using the headings provided.
You should provide some relevant references (research methods, texts) where you can, e.g. in relation to research ethics, where you refer to the strengths and weaknesses of the r.
ENV 101Final Project GuidanceDraft ScaffoldA. INTRODUCTION.docx
ENV 101
Final Project Guidance
Draft Scaffold
A. INTRODUCTION
Why is this topic/question one that you wanted to ask?
Why is it important that we learn more about this topic/question?
My research question(s) is/are…
B. LITERATURE REVIEW:
What do we already know about this topic?
Topic 1:
Topic 2:
Topic 3:
Topic 4:
Topic 5:
C. METHOD
How are you collecting original data/information?
Why is that method the right one for the question you are asking?
Who are your participants?
How do you have access to your participants?
What questions are you asking them? OR In what ways are you modifying a behavior?
D. RESULTS
If you have some results already what are they?
If you don’t have results already, consider your questions or your actions, what do you expect to see?
How do you plan on displaying your results? (This might be a table, if you have multiple participants, it might be a written paragraph for each question that you ask, it might be a log of your behavior modification, day by day)
E. ANALYSIS AND INSIGHTS
What did your literature review tell you in answer to the research question that you asked?
What did your original data collection tell you in answer to your research question?
Did your original data collection support or correspond with what you found in your literature review?
What did you find challenging about you behavior modification, if that is what you did? How did your survey/interview participants struggle with the questions that you asked, if that was your method of data collection?
ENV 101
Introduction to Environmental Science
FINAL PROJECT
The learning objectives for this class are the following:
-understand the basic environmental processes that shape the natural world around them.
-evaluate the reciprocal relationship between human and environmental systems.
-consider environmental problems from both a global and a local perspective.
-understand the impact of human decisions on the natural environment (both positive and negative).
-understand some of the ways in which scientists gather information, as well as, analyze and communicate their findings.
Everything we did in class was aimed at improved your understanding and skill related to these learning objectives. I don’t want you all to leave as scientists, but I want you to be able to navigate scientific information related to environmental issues with some understanding and ability to take it apart and use it to make well-informed decisions.
The final project is designed to give you the opportunity to reflect the improvement in your understanding and skill and to consider your relationship to the environment. For this project, you will select a behavior that you engage in, that has an impact on the environment. This behavior will be the foundation of a research question that investigate and use to inform your perspective on this particular environmental beha ...
Research Critique.pptx
This document provides guidance on how to conduct a critical appraisal or critique of a research report. It emphasizes that a critique requires careful examination of all aspects of a study, including its methodology, analysis, and conclusions. The critique should objectively assess both the strengths and limitations of the research. Key aspects that should be evaluated include the study's design, sampling approach, data collection and analysis methods, and whether ethical standards were upheld. The critique aims to advance scientific knowledge by helping to identify ways future studies could be improved.
Tips and tricks in hand surgery research
The document provides tips for conducting successful clinical research. It discusses defining a worthy research problem or question, staying motivated throughout the research process, beginning with a literature review to understand the current knowledge in the area, and networking and collaborating with others. It also emphasizes maintaining organization through project management tools and time management.
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (httpwww.lib.uog.docx
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/using-scientific-journal-article-write-critical-review)
Using a Scientific Journal Article to Write a Critical Review
Writing a critical review of a journal article can help to improve your research skills. By assessing the work of others, you develop skills as a critical reader and become familiar with the types of evaluation criteria that will be applied to research in your field and thus your own research.
You are expected to read the article carefully, analyse it, and evaluate the quality and originality of the research, as well as its relevance and presentation. Its strengths and weaknesses are assessed, followed by its overall value. Do not be confused by the term critique: it does not mean that you only look at the negative aspects of what the researcher has done. You should address both the positive and negative aspects.
If your lecturer has given you specific advice on how to write a critical review, follow that advice. If not, the following steps may help you. These steps are based on a detailed description of how to analyse and evaluate a research article provided by Wood (2003) in her lab guide.
This guide is divided into two parts. The first part, "Researching the Critique," outlines the steps involved in selecting and evaluating a research article. The second part, "Writing your Critique," discusses two possible ways to structure your critique paper.
A. Researching the Critique
The questions listed under many of the subheadings in this section may provide you with a good place to begin understanding what you are looking for and what form your critique might take.
1. Select a Topic
If your lecturer does not assign a topic or a particular article for you to review, and you must choose a topic yourself, try using a review article from your field. Review articles summarize and evaluate current studies (research articles) on a particular topic. Select a review article on a topic that interests you and that is written clearly so you can understand it.
2. Select a Research Article
Use the review article to select a research article. This can be very useful in writing your critique. The review article will provide background information for your analysis, as well as establishing that the research paper you are critiquing is significant: if the paper was not so highly regarded, it would not have been selected to be reviewed.
When choosing a research article, examine the Materials & Methods section closely and make sure you have a good grasp of the techniques and methods used. If you don't, you may have difficulty evaluating them.
3. Analyse the Text
Read the article(s) carefully. As you read the article(s) use the following questions to help you understand how and why the research was carried out.
· What is the author's central purpose? Look at INTRODUCTION.
· What methods were used to accomplish this purpose (systematic recor ...
Seven steps for framing and testing a research paper
I use the steps in this presentation to:
(i) test research ideas for research papers,
(ii) shape research papers, and
(iii) help draft the Introduction section of a research paper.
For each step I draft one or two concise paragraphs.
I then present and share these with co-authors, collaborators and colleagues to test the ideas and get feedback on how interesting and valid they are.
I consider and work through these steps several times during the life of a research paper framed.
Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline.docx
1. This document provides guidelines for critically appraising a quantitative research study and writing an assignment on it. Students are to select a study, preferably from a nursing journal, and critically evaluate it using the provided criteria.
2. The evaluation should address the research problem, literature review, framework, objectives, variables, methodology, measurements, data collection/analysis, results, and implications for nursing practice. A rubric is provided to guide the assignment.
3. Students will present their critique to the class, discussing aspects of the evaluation. The goal is to help students understand how to conduct a literature review and evidence-based practice, as well as gain knowledge from nursing research.
ROL.pptx
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. It discusses the purposes of a literature review, which include justifying the need for a research study and demonstrating knowledge of previous work. The document also outlines the key steps to writing a literature review, such as developing an organization and search strategy, analyzing sources, and structuring the review with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Surviving Your Viva or Dissertation Defense
This document provides guidance for post-graduate students preparing to defend their thesis or final project. It discusses variations in the defense process between countries and institutions. It also addresses how defenses are evaluated, the range of questions students may face, and tips for ensuring success. Key points include outlining standards for outstanding, acceptable, and unacceptable work. It emphasizes the importance of internal consistency and addressing examiners' questions specifically for one's own university and research.
Research proposal writing
This presentation covers the basics of preparing a research proposal in Social Sciences.
A Malayalam video explaining this presentation can be accessed at https://youtu.be/acg9Y3mQs9A
Note: This is not suitable for preparing a proposal for research funding
Review roleija originalstudy
This document provides guidelines for peer reviewing original articles and clinical investigations submitted to the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. It outlines key areas to check such as headings, title, abstract, keywords, and main sections of the article including introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Reviewers are asked to check that appropriate approvals and consent were obtained, the study design and statistical analysis are sound, results are clearly presented, discussions are supported by citations, and references are formatted correctly. Guidelines also cover reviewing images, illustrations, videos andlegends.
Review roleija originalstudy 2
This document provides guidelines for peer reviewers to evaluate original articles submitted to the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. It includes a checklist of criteria to assess for various sections of the article like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Reviewers are asked to evaluate if the manuscript includes the necessary components for each section, follows ethical guidelines, and uses appropriate statistical analyses and language. The goal is to promote high-quality scientific writing while maintaining constructive feedback to authors.
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
This document provides guidance for students on completing their critical review and professional artefact assignments for the BA (Hons) programme. It discusses the structure and content required for the critical review, including an introduction, evaluation of the inquiry process, analysis of findings, and critical reflection. It also provides examples of how to analyze different types of data collected, such as observations, surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Finally, it addresses formatting requirements, use of citations and references, and responding to common student questions about distinguishing the critical review from the professional artefact.
Chapter 4, Conceptualizing A Research Study
Sample lecture from the DCT College of Liberal Arts.
Stay tuned to be updated on when is the next enrollment date and learn with us.
BAGAIMANA MENGENALPASTI PERMASALAHAN KAJIAN??
The document provides guidance on how to identify and define a research problem. It discusses the key elements of a research problem statement, including describing the ideal situation, current reality, and consequences of not addressing the problem. Some important sources of research problems are one's own experiences, deductions from theory, and gaps found in related literature. The problem statement should have a clear topic and be narrowed down through reviewing literature. Determining whether a problem is worth researching involves considering if it advances knowledge, contributes to practice, and fills gaps in existing research. The document outlines steps for writing a problem statement and differentiates a research problem from other aspects of a study like the topic, purpose, and research questions. It also compares quantitative and qualitative purpose statements
Similar to First Summarize the research what is the.docx (20)
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
! 1Running head INFORMED CONSENT RUA Informed Consen.docx
DATA EXTRACTION SHEETAuthorFirst author’s surnameDateYea.docx
DATA EXTRACTION SHEETAuthorFirst author’s surnameDateYea.docx
ENV 101Final Project GuidanceDraft ScaffoldA. INTRODUCTION.docx
ENV 101Final Project GuidanceDraft ScaffoldA. INTRODUCTION.docx
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (httpwww.lib.uog.docx
University of Guelph, Learning Commons Library (httpwww.lib.uog.docx
Seven steps for framing and testing a research paper
Seven steps for framing and testing a research paper
Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline.docx
Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline.docx
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
Final 23.3.12 cs3 mod 3 review of analysis and learning 3760
More from studywriters
inventor who is currently living in Northeast Ohio and answer.docx
The document provides instructions for an assignment asking students to research an inventor currently living in Northeast Ohio. It lists 9 questions to answer about the inventor, including their name, invention, impact of the invention, benefits to the inventor, improvements over time, work background, funding sources, number of patents, and personal background details. Students are to include 2 references in APA format and not use 3 specific inventors for the assignment.
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Despite efforts to improve patient safety, medical errors continue to occur. Some errors result in minor issues, while others can permanently alter or end a patient's life. Many errors stem from ineffective communication between caregivers. This document discusses analyzing a medical error or near miss to identify contributing factors, preventability, stakeholder impacts, team responsibilities, quality improvement measures taken, and proposed additional solutions to prevent similar incidents.
Health care has become to depend on information technology.docx
Health care has become dependent on information technology like electronic medical records to deliver, monitor, and communicate patient care. IT plays a key role in measuring and improving the quality of care through tools like EMRs and EHRs, which can help providers access patient information but may also introduce challenges in healthcare delivery if not implemented correctly.
Health care facilities treat many types of For.docx
Health care facilities collect patient data to document treatment, support reimbursement processes, and maintain patient health. The type of data collected varies depending on the facility and whether patients are inpatients, outpatients, or long-term patients. This document discusses three common data sets - the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set for inpatients, the Uniform Ambulatory Care Data Set for outpatients, and the Minimum Data Set for long-term patients. The writer is tasked with reviewing each data set, describing their elements, and identifying one similarity and difference between the sets.
Health Belief Model.docx
The document discusses the requirements for a student paper on the Health Belief Model theory. Students must write a 4-6 page paper, excluding references and title page, that: 1) Explains the concepts and subconcepts of the Health Belief Model theory clearly and simply; 2) Describes how the theory can be broadly applied across cultures and provides examples; 3) Discusses the impact and future implications of the theory, citing at least 3 references excluding Wikipedia. The paper will be graded based on an rubric evaluating the discussion of the theory, examples of its application, impact and references, as well as adherence to APA style guidelines.
Health assessment.docx
The document provides instructions for a graded assignment on applying the nursing process in a health assessment. Students are asked to:
1) Describe their practice setting and typical patient population.
2) Provide examples of subjective and objective data collected through assessment.
3) Explain their documentation process and whether technology is involved.
4) Describe how they analyze data and what the end result is, such as formulating nursing diagnoses and care plans.
Health and Professional Ethics.docx
This chapter discusses how health policy, politics, and professional ethics intersect. It explores how nurses can influence policy and advocates for ethical, evidence-based policymaking. The chapter also examines the political process and nurses' role in advocating for patients and the profession.
Health and Advocacy.docx
To understand factors related to disease outbreaks, one must assess concepts related to health behavior, communication, and advocacy. A community coalition meeting presentation script should address verbalizing the local measles problem and assistance needs, describing intrapersonal and interpersonal factors contributing to measles contraction, identifying health behaviors to reduce measles risk, explaining how social marketing principles can change measles-related behaviors, and examining benefits and consequences of health advocacy to policymakers.
he brain changes as we Explain the changes in.docx
As we age, the brain undergoes changes in activity involved in processing memories. Two articles and chapters from a textbook on learning, memory, and neuropsychology should be read to understand these changes. The articles discuss postmortem examinations of patient HM's brain through histological sectioning and 3D reconstruction, and the use of neuropsychology to study brain-behavior relationships.
HCR 210 Week 1 DQs.docx
1. Three ways to ensure standard measures of performance in medical records management are: regular training and education on standards; consistent quality control through audits and reviews; and adherence to established policies and procedures.
2. The Joint Commission is an accreditation agency that affects the area of information management in medical records. Accreditation sets requirements for collecting, storing, and using records. Hospitals following accreditation have formal record management policies, while those setting their own policies may have inconsistent approaches increasing errors.
HCS 131 Course Presentation.docx
This course covered important concepts of workplace communication including:
1) The role of perception and principles of cross-cultural communication.
2) The importance of active listening, and how communication climates and technology affect interactions.
3) Different types of conflict and strategies for effective management.
4) The significance of teamwork, consumer relations, and positive employee relations.
The presentation outlines key lessons from each week, best practices like clear communication and goal setting, and examples of applying these skills to enhance organizational performance and patient satisfaction.
Hawksbill sea turtle Conservation Management.docx
The document provides specifications for a short scientific paper on the conservation and management of hawksbill sea turtles. It outlines that the paper should be 2 pages and include: 1) an overview of threats to the species like bycatch and climate change, 2) more detail on a single threat, and 3) a discussion of management efforts to address threats. The paper should also include at least one referenced figure and 3 references from scientific literature using the journal style Ecology.
Is social media more beneficial or more harmful to our.docx
This prompt asks the student to write a 2000+ word paper arguing whether social media is more beneficial or harmful to society, including an argument, rebuttal, and response to the rebuttal paragraphs. The paper must be typed, double-spaced, with a title page and works cited page, avoiding first and second person pronouns while using at least 4 sources. The essay does not need to use complex language or terminology.
Is relevant to Teslas.docx
This document discusses whether co-creation is relevant to Tesla's campaign and whether it could lead to exploitation or opportunities. It provides examples of how companies have successfully involved consumers through social media platforms, contests, feedback options, and supporting causes important to customers. However, some argue that co-creation represents a form of exploitation as consumers are not paid for their contributions and often pay premium prices for co-created products. The document also discusses debates around whether co-creation transfers control to consumers or further enables their exploitation through "new forms of governmentality."
Having more clarity about helps one become a better.docx
Having clarity about their values helps a leader be more consistent and make better decisions. When a leader shares their values with their team, it shows the team what to expect from the leader and what the leader expects of them. An effective leader finds their unique leadership style that fully embraces their own values, rather than copying another leader's style. While a leader should be committed to their own values, they should also understand that team members may have different values and priorities. Valuing collaboration helps create a team where everyone's ideas are valued.
Is prostitution morally Should we legalize.docx
This document asks a series of questions about the morality and legalization of prostitution, as well as supporting a child with intellectual differences in their sexuality and relationships. Specifically, it asks whether prostitution is morally wrong and if it should be legalized, detailing the potential pros and cons, and also inquiring about fears or concerns in allowing a child with intellectual differences to express their sexuality through marriage and children.
Is Moral Anger.docx
This document outlines an argument for whether moral anger exists. It presents three supporting arguments and one counter argument. The first supporting argument claims that if moral anger exists, then moral facts exist, and moral anger does exist as evidenced by sources. The counter argument states anger is not necessarily moral, but the reply argues that anger towards injustice is a reaction to a lack of moral concern for others, making it moral. The second supporting argument says if moral facts exist, then moral realist theses are valid, and anger towards being morally diminished is a moral fact. The final argument concludes that if a single moral fact exists, such as anger, then moral realist theses are sound.
Is Price gouging criminal or is it the free market.docx
Price gouging during natural disasters is still morally and economically wrong according to the document. While free markets are typically efficient, disasters cause markets to break down completely in impacted areas that cannot be physically accessed. Natural disasters are also usually short-term events that market forces cannot rapidly respond to. When access to essential resources like water and fuel are limited after a disaster, relying on price gouging would direct scarce supplies only to those who can pay rather than based on needs.
is never total and never The Social.docx
Socialization is an ongoing process that occurs throughout one's life. Primary socialization occurs during childhood through interactions with family and influences a person's basic values and behaviors. Secondary socialization continues into adulthood through school, work, and other social institutions and leads to the adoption of social roles. A lack of socialization can negatively impact cognitive development in children and adults as social interactions are important for learning and maintaining cognitive function. Socialization is never complete as people encounter new social groups and contexts throughout their lives that require ongoing learning and adjustment.
is medicine and doctors need to prescribe.docx
This document discusses the statement that exercise should be prescribed like medicine by doctors. It asks for a critical discussion of this statement with reference to psychological theory and social determinants of exercise behavior. The discussion should be double spaced with 12pt Arial or Times New Roman font and reference list in APA format. It should be approximately 2000 words and specify the exact word count at the end before the references.
More from studywriters (20)
inventor who is currently living in Northeast Ohio and answer.docx
inventor who is currently living in Northeast Ohio and answer.docx
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Health care organizations strive to create a culture of.docx
Health care has become to depend on information technology.docx
Health care has become to depend on information technology.docx
Health care facilities treat many types of For.docx
Health care facilities treat many types of For.docx
he brain changes as we Explain the changes in.docx
he brain changes as we Explain the changes in.docx
Is social media more beneficial or more harmful to our.docx
Is social media more beneficial or more harmful to our.docx
Having more clarity about helps one become a better.docx
Having more clarity about helps one become a better.docx
Is Price gouging criminal or is it the free market.docx
Is Price gouging criminal or is it the free market.docx
Recently uploaded
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdAzure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
PCOS corelations and management through Ayurveda.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Recently uploaded (20)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
First Summarize the research what is the.docx
- 1. First part: Summarize the research study: what is the background, First part:Summarize the research study: what is the background, hypothesis(es), methods (enough detail for me follow how the study was conducted and main aspects of the methods related to the validity and generalizability of the research), and highlight the author(s) interpretation of the findings. This should all be in your own words and avoid your personal opinion in this section.Second part:Personal ideas or perceptions, based on your analysis and evaluation of the research methodology and conclusions. Focus on the main research problem and critique of the methods used in the study in addressing the question or address one or more of the specific ideas/points/findings and describe your opinion. 3-4 pages in APA format not including the cover page and references Answer the following questions in your analysis:• Do you agree with the conclusions the authors are stating? Is it free of bias? Does it make a meaningful contribution to our knowledge or to society in some way?• What questions come to mind about the main ideas/points, methodology, research findings, and/or conclusions?• Can you generalize the results to other populations or settings? How are subgroups addressed (or not), i.e., gender, race, culture, demographics, social or economic groups, etc.?• How can the material relate to the modern world, to the society and to specific groups of individuals?What are your conclusions about the information in the article and the author(s) position?