This document outlines the Summer Placement Project for Team OMEGA at Jet Protect in 2015. The team consists of 4 members with specific roles: Project Planner, Engineering Lead, Project Manager, and Commercial Lead. They have developed several concepts for an interactive product to increase knowledge of electronic warfare and promote awareness of Selex ES, including an electronic game, interactive spectrum slider, electronic board game, and internal mobile application. After evaluating the concepts, they selected the electronic game as the top concept to pursue. The document includes details of stakeholder requirements, concept designs, meetings, and the project timeline and management.

1. Summer Placement Project - Team OMEGA
Jet Protect
2015

2. Jenny Barker
• Project Planner
– Meeting agendas and minutes
– Targets and time frames
– Budget
Calum Cunningham
• Engineering Lead
– Oversee engineering tasks
– Research and resourcing
materials
– Design
Introductions
Robert Noakes
• Project Manager
– Ensuring team fulfils
deadlines
– Delegating tasks
Jordan King
• Commercial Lead
– Stakeholder relations
– Organise external
meetings
2

3. Team Structure
Robert Noakes
Project Manager
Jordan King
Commercial Lead
Calum Cunningham
Engineering Lead
Jenny Barker
Project Planner
3

4. 4
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

5. Project Brief
‘To design a product that increases EW knowledge;
enhances company awareness and motivates people
to work for Selex ES’
Problems:
• Internal
– The cross department knowledge is low
– Big world picture (Systems Overview)
– Sites work in an isolated fashion with little knowledge and work sharing
– Little celebration of individual and group work within Selex ES
– No off the shelf solution for EW demonstrations at desired level
• External
– University degrees are not tailored to EW
– External knowledge of EW and Selex ES is very poor
– Work is restricted in its nature so not available commercially
5

6. Project Time Management
Gantt Chart
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu FriTasks
Team Structure Organised
Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholder Requirements
Concepts Generated
Meetings with Stakeholders
Preparation of Interim Presentation
Final Presentation
Feedback Session
Raspberry Pi Circuit Constructed
Game Code for RPi Tested
Prototype Box Constructed
Stakeholder Analysis Finished - Deliverable 1
Stakeholder Requirements Finished - Deliverable 2
Solution Document Finished - Deliverable 3
Final Report Finished - Deliverable 4
13-Aug-15
Final Presentation Preparation
System Analysis
SPP Kick-off Presentation
23-Jul-15 30-Jul-15 06-Aug-15
First Presentation
Chosen Design Brainstorm and Development
Feedback from Stakeholders
Adjust Design according to Feedback Received
Parts Finalised and Ordered
6
= Predicted

7. Development Process
System Requirements Engineering
7

8. 8
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

9. Stakeholders
Internal/External Divide
Consultants
University
ambassadors
Students
MoD/Government
Employees Students
Other EW
companies
Careers fair
organisers
General public
Employees’ family
Organisers
Members
Stakeholders
Fit For the
Future
Selex ES
employees
Universities,
schools and
colleges
External
organisations
End users
Assessors
Engineering
the future
Big Bang
University
liaison lead
EESE mentors
Schools liaison lead
9

10. Stakeholder Analysis
Importance/Influence Grid
Team Mentors
FFF
Organisers
University
Ambassadors/
Liaisons
Assessors
Employees as
end users
The Team
University
Students
University Careers
service
Family of
Employees
Other EW
companies
Educational
institutions
Government
(MoD)
Employees as
consultants
10

11. Stakeholder Analysis
Head of Engineering the Future (schools)
Need something interactive.
Low technical knowledge required to understand.
Easy to set-up and transport.
Team building activities work well.
University Liaison Lead
Need something that stands out to draw them towards career stands.
Something interactive with a registration of details page.
Big Bang representative
A product that is enjoyable, as a celebration of STEM subjects
Not recruitment-based
Fit For the Future representative
Need for the SAP system to be more user-friendly
Stakeholder Feedback
11

12. 12
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

13. Stakeholder Requirements
The product shall increase users’ EW knowledge
The product shall promote awareness of Selex ES and its products
The product shall motivate people to work for Selex ES
The product shall be interactive
The product should be aesthetically appealing to the end users
The product should be cost-effective and within budget
The product should be suitable to the EW knowledge of the user
It is desirable that the product has high scalability and modularity
General Requirements
13

14. Stakeholder Requirements
The product shall increase users’ EW knowledge
The product shall promote awareness of Selex ES and its products
The product shall motivate people to work for Selex ES
The product shall be interactive
The product should be aesthetically appealing to users
The product should be cost-effective and within budget
The product should be suitable to the EW knowledge of the user
It is desirable that the product has high scalability and modularity
General Requirements
14

15. Development Process
System Functional Analysis
16

16. 17
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

17. EW Game/App
An electronic game (perhaps a mobile app)
Players will have to protect a platform (e.g. a Typhoon) from a variety of incoming threats
The player must choose the most effective ECM
Players will gain points based on their performance
Builds a good knowledge of EW
Highly interactive and engaging, especially for young people
Concept 1
18

18. EM Spectrum Sliding Scale
Interactive touchscreen programme
After selecting an area, information will pop out with information of what
this part of the spectrum is used for in the real world.
Relates to current Selex ES products and EW
Concept 2
19

19. Electronic Board Game
Concept 3
A model Typhoon will be placed on a grid
Possible threats will be placed on the grid with
the Typhoon.
On a screen there will be a radar simulation to
help them detect the possible threats to protect
their plane.
Ability to change the radar parameters
A weight sensor or a colour detecting camera.
20

20. Internal Selex App
Mobile application for use by Selex staff
start.Warwick taken as inspiration
Selex Main Products
• Descriptions
• Technologies in use
• Teaching about EW
Contains relevant information useful to new
employees
• Integration of email account
• Guidance for booking meeting rooms,
room locations, etc.
• SAP
Takes the current intranet page of Selex ES
and displays it in a clear format for the user
Concept 4
21

21. Evaluation of Concepts
Concept Education
of EW
(20%)
Promotion
of Selex ES
(25%)
Scalability/
Modularity
(10%)
Cost-
effectiveness
(10%)
Interactivity
(15%)
Feasibility
(20%)
SCORE:
EW game 8 6 9 7 9 5 7.05
EM
spectrum
slider
7 8 4 8 7 6 6.85
Electronic
Board
Game
6 5 7 5 9 7 6.40
Internal
Selex app
3 9 8 7 3 4 5.60
22

22. 23
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

23. Why should Engineering companies get involved
with schools and Universities?
“Engineering companies are projected to have
2.56 million job openings from 2012-2022.”
“This means we need to double the number of
engineering apprentices and double the number of
people with engineering qualifications such as
engineering degrees, in order to meet the demand for
engineers.” Tomorrows Engineers
24

24. Why School Children?
“Only 18% of students study A level maths
and only 8% study physics” Questions for governors
“Only 12% of parents would recommend an
engineering career to their son” FFF
“An even lower 2% of parents would
recommend the same to their daughter” FFF
25

25. 26
Who do we want to be at careers fairs and
school events?

26. What Selex ES already do?
Marble Run
• Pros
– Interactive
– Problem solving
• Cons
– Doesn’t link to Selex ES
– Isn’t engineering related
Geo locator
• Pros
– Competitive
– Memorable
• Cons
– Not very interactive
– Doesn’t attract attention
STEM days and small piece
• Pros
– In depth involvement
– High learning and education
benefits
• Cons
– Activities take a long time
– Can’t be taken to stall events
Rampaging chariots
• Pros
– Interactive
– Hands on
• Cons
– Doesn’t link to Selex ES
– Isn’t very portable
27

27. Concept Requirements
The product shall be Interactive
The product shall link to Selex ES
The product shall be engineering related
The product should be Competitive
The product should be Memorable
The product should attract attention
The product should be sufficiently portable for relevant events
The product should be small enough to be used on a table top and fit in a hire car
28

28. 29
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

29. Initial Ideas
30
Classic Board Game
• The board would be electronic and interactive.
• The aim is to get your plane from the ‘enemy’ territory to the
homeland
• LED’s turn on, showing positions of enemy RADAR’s
• If you are one space away from an enemy RADAR, press
button to select threat
• Then see which ECM you can use such as BriteCloud,
flares, chaff etc
• If your ECM matches the threat, the threat is neutralised and
you survive the ‘round’

30. Initial Ideas
Reaction Game
• Strips of LEDs leading to a central plane represent different types of threats
• Buttons corresponding to these threats indicate the four different countermeasures
they can release.
• During the game the player presses the button corresponding to the correct strip of
LEDs, and the threats increase in speed
• When the player fails to press the button the ‘Game over’ screen appears and the
player’s time is recorded. Their time and name are then placed on the leader board.
31
Radar Detection Game
• The threats are plugged into the board.
• The player uses the radar screen to guess where the threats could be
placed.
• They type in the grid coordinates.
• When each threat coordinate is found the LED light on the threat turns off
and the player is notified on the laptop screen.
• When all the threats have been found the timer stops and the players
name and time is placed on a leader board.

31. Initial Ideas Evaluation
Positives of Reaction Game
The game could be quick
The game could be visual
The programming was feasible.
The hardware design was feasible
Easy to implement EW knowledge within the game
Negatives of Radar Detection
The programming and hardware wasn’t as feasible
Doesn’t link perfectly to Selex ES
Negatives of Classic Board Game
Would have taken too long to play the game
It wasn’t very modern
It was very Electronic or visual
32
Why we chose Jet Protect

32. 33
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

33. Final Concept: Introduction
Board game
One-player
Reaction-based
Target Audience
• School children
• For use at Big Bang Fair, STEM days, etc.
• Could also perhaps be aimed at an older
audience – students, etc
34

34. 600 mm
400mm
LED Strips
Buttons
Touchscreen
Box containing
Raspberry Pi
and its
components
35

35. System Operation
36
User Input LED’s OutRaspberry Pi GPIO Menu and Score O/P to LCD

36. 37
Code Flow Chart

37. Menu
38

38. New game
Products
Careers
Options
Menu
Exit
39
Demo

39. New Game
Enter your name
or initials:………..
Enter your email
address:………..
40

40. New Game
Enter your name
or initials: Jenny B
Enter your email
address: jenny.bar..
41

41. New Game
Would you like to hear
about opportunities with
Selex ES?
• Graduate training
programmes
• Summer placement
• Apprenticeships
Yes
Please
No
Thanks
42

42. Introduction
Skip
Intro
Your mission is to protect
the typhoon from the
incoming threats
Do this by deploying the
correct electronic
countermeasure in time
The threats will speed up,
and your score will depend
on how long you last
Good luck!
43

43. BriteCloud
The red lights indicate that
you are being attacked by a
Radio Frequency tracking
missile.
You need to release your
Britecloud, Radio
Frequency deployed decoy.
Red Button!
44

44. Flares
The yellow lights indicate
that you are being attacked
by a Heat seeking missile.
You need to release your
Flares, the heat from the
flares throw the missile off
course.
Yellow
Button!
45

45. Chaff
The Green lights indicate
that you have been
identified by a unknown
radar signal.
You need to release Chaff,
small pieces of metal, used
to cloud the enemy radar
screen.
Green Button!
46

46. DIRCM
The blue lights indicate a
laser following missile is
locked onto your typhoon.
DIRCM deflects IR-Guided
missiles by aiming a laser
back at the threat and
confusing it.
Blue Button!
47

47. Time 00:00
48

48. 49

49. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
50

50. 51

51. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
52

52. 53

53. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
54

54. 55

55. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
56

56. 57

57. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
58

58. 59

59. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
60

60. 61

61. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
62

62. 63

63. Game over!
Your Score : 3:12
Go to Leader
board
64

64. Leader board
Name Score
1 Jenny 3:12
2 Jordan 3:02
3 Calum 2:53
4 Rob 1:08
5 Alex 0:04
Menu
65

65. 66
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

66. Apprenticeships
Graduates
Summer placements
Work Experience
Careers
67

67. Summer Placements
We offer a number summer placement
for students studying for a degree or
other professional qualifications.
Our placements offer invaluable
opportunity to work on real projects
facing complex challenges as part of a
team. Placements start in June and
end in September.
Menu
Selex ES provides
opportunities for
training and
development and
the opportunity to
participate in a
variety of Education
Liaison activities.
More Info
68

68. Apprenticeships
They combine hands-on training with further
day release. This means you will be building
a successful career working alongside true
professionals, while gaining nationally
recognised valuable qualifications for the
future.
Selex ES have invested heavily in our
Technical, Software, Manufacturing, Business
and Secretarial Apprenticeships
More Info Menu
You will also be
involved in real
projects, gaining an
insight into how a
highly successful
company operates.
69

69. Graduate Programmes
Welcome to the Transnational Graduate
Development Programme. Its aim is to give you
a flavour of the benefits and unique
opportunities you can expect by joining Selex
ES as a graduate within the UK and Italy.
The two year scheme provides graduates with
the best possible start to their career, excellent
prospects and great development opportunities
within the wider Finmeccanica Group.
More Info Menu
70

70. BriteCloud
HIDAS
Miysis DIRCM
Products
71

71. BriteCloud
BriteCloud Expendable Active Decoy (EAD)
is a compact, DRFM-based active RF
countermeasure that has the capability to
defeat the majority of RF-guided surface-to-
air and air-to-air threat systems. BriteCloud
is designed to be dispensed from standard
chaff/flare dispensers and therefore
requires minimal platform integration.
Utilising advanced techniques it is effective
against active and semi-active RF seekers,
and fire control radars.
More Info Menu
72

72. HIDAS
Helicopter Integrated Defensive Aids
System (HIDAS) combines a radar and laser
warning receiver, missile warning system
and chaff and flares. It is fitted to UK
Chinook and Puma helicopters, as well as
UK and exported Apache helicopters. Using
multi-spectral sensors and pre-loaded
intelligence to produce comprehensive
tactical pictures of the operational
environment,
More Info Menu
HIDAS rapidly
identifies hostile
systems and initiates
appropriate
countermeasures.
73

73. Miysis DIRCM
Miysis, the latest generation Directed Infrared
Countermeasure (DIRCM) System, is a
readily exportable countermeasures device
providing assured, persistent protection from
IR-guided missiles, including advanced, all-
aspect Man Portable Air Defence Systems
(MANPADS). Suitable for any platform,
Miysis can be configured as either a fully
integrated or podded solution.
More Info Menu
74

74. Costings of the prototype
Item Cost Quantity
Raspberry Pi £26.60 1
Starter Kit £13.95 1
Wi-Fi adapter £7.38 1
SD card £8.25 1
Total £56.18 5
75

75. Predicted costings of prototype and final product
76
Item Cost Quantity
Raspberry Pi £26.60 1
Starter Kit £13.95 1
Wifi adapter £7.38 1
SD Card £8.25 1
7 Inch Capacitive
Touch Screen LCD
HDMI 800×480 For
Raspberry Pi
£45.98 1
RGB LED strips £20.99 1
Big Dome Push
Buttons
£7.99 4
Total £155.11 10

76. 77
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

77. How it Meets Requirements
The product shall increase users’ EW knowledge
The product shall promote awareness of Selex ES and its products
The product shall motivate people to work for Selex ES
The product shall be interactive
The product should be aesthetically appealing to the end users
The product should be cost-effective and within budget
The product should be suitable to the EW knowledge of the user
It is desirable that the product has high scalability and modularity
78

78. How it Meets the Concept Requirements
The product shall be Interactive
The product shall link to Selex ES
The product shall be engineering related
The product should be Competitive
The product should be Memorable
The product should attract attention
The product should be sufficiently portable for relevant events
The product should be small enough to be used on a table top and fit in a hire
car
79

79. 80
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

80. Positive Aspects
Simple
Interactive
Engaging
Competitive
Visual
Fun
Addictive
81

81. Negative Aspects
Easy to skip EW information and just play the game
Too much information for the time they have
Doesn’t focus a lot on recruitment
82

82. 83
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

83. Prototype development
GUI
• Animated plane in the centre which reacts
• Menu
• Leader board
Increase number of threat “tracks”
Sounds and music
Use of RGB LED strips
Change LED/Threat behaviour
• Clear Screen
• LED “speed”
Age range selection
• Difficulty
• Careers
84

84. Packaging and Transportation
Secure Box for transport
Able to fit in a hire car
A single case for all the parts of the game
The box will open for any electronics to be removed
or repaired
Transparent Perspex casing
85

85. Large Touchscreen with Higher Detail of Threats
Entire board as LCD Touchscreen
Detail of Animations/Countermeasure Locations
Inventory of ECMs
• Threats are named, player has to select
correct countermeasure
Wall-mounted
TV Screen
• Replaces board
• Allows for larger animations
86
Vision for the project

86. 87
Animated plane on large screen
• Manoeuvres
• ECM visible (e.g. flare release)
Choice of aircraft – even helicopters
Visual and audio warnings
Game Over results in pilot ejecting
Air Craft Versatility

87. 88
Engaging with a younger audience
Leaderboard
Two player – App for game with up to 4
players?
• Teamwork
• Communication
Online leader boards – Twitter
Possible App Included
• Buttons
• Multiplayer
• Leader board position
• Extra information
Mobile App

88. 89
Contents
1) Interpreting the Brief
2) Stakeholders
3) Initial Concepts
4) Product Refinement
5) Final Concept Design
6) Final Concept Evaluation
7) Future Modifications
8) Group Evaluation
2.1) Analysis
2.2) Requirements
4.1) Sub-Concepts
5.1) Demonstration
6.1) Meeting Requirements
6.2) Positives and Negatives

89. Project Time Management
90
Gantt Chart
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tues Wed Thu FriTasks
Team Structure Organised
Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholder Requirements
Concepts Generated
Meetings with Stakeholders
Preparation of Interim Presentation
Final Presentation
Feedback Session
Raspberry Pi Circuit Constructed
Game Code for RPi Tested
Prototype Box Constructed
Stakeholder Analysis Finished - Deliverable 1
Stakeholder Requirements Finished - Deliverable 2
Solution Document Finished - Deliverable 3
Final Report Finished - Deliverable 4
13-Aug-15
Final Presentation Preparation
System Analysis
SPP Kick-off Presentation
23-Jul-15 30-Jul-15 06-Aug-15
First Presentation
Chosen Design Brainstorm and Development
Feedback from Stakeholders
Adjust Design according to Feedback Received
Parts Finalised and Ordered
= Actual
= Predicted

90. What we have learnt
• User requirements
• Engineering process
• Selex ES’ current school
programmes
Challenges
• Learning a new language/interface
• Learning a new project process
• Low product development before
initial presentation
Group Evaluation
91

91. How we worked as a team
• Team meetings
• Communication
• Even delegation of work
• All worked on different areas
• Time management
• Team decision making
Positives
• Resilience
• Time Keeping
• Teamwork
Improvements
• More time developing concepts
• Restricted creativity
• Better time management
Group Evaluation
92

92. Thank you – Any questions?
93