SlideShare a Scribd company logo
6. Software Lifecycle
Models
A software lifecycle model is a standardised
format for
 planning
 organising, and
 running
a new development project.
Hundreds of different kinds of models are
known and used.
Many are minor variations on just a small
number of basic models. In this section we:
 survey the main types of model, and
 consider how to choose between them.
6.1. Planning with Models
SE projects usually live with a fixed financial
budget. (An exception is maintainance?)
Additionally, time-to-market places a strong
time constraint.
There will be other project constraints such
as staff.
Project constraints
money
time
Computing
resources
staff
programmers managers
designers
Examples of Project Constraints
Project planning is the art of scheduling the
necessary activities, in time, space and across
staff in order to optimise:
 project risk [low] (see later)
 profit [high]
 customer satisfaction [high]
 worker satisfaction [high]
 long-term company goals
Questions:
1. What are these necessary activities?
(besides programming)
2. Are there good patterns of organisation
that we could copy?
A project plan contains much information,
but must at least describe:
 resources needed
(people, money, equipment, etc)
 dependency & timing of work
(flow graph, work packages)
 rate of delivery (reports, code, etc)
It is impossible to measure rate of progress
except with reference to a plan.
In addition to project members, the following
may need access to parts of the project plan:
 Management,
 Customers
 Subcontractors
 Suppliers
 Investors
 Banks
6.2. Project Visibility
Unlike other engineers
(e.g. civil, electronic, chemical … etc.)
software engineers do not produce anything
physical.
It is inherently difficult to monitor an SE
project due to lack of visibility.
This means that SE projects must produce
additional deliverables (artifacts)
which are visible, such as:
 Design documents/ prototypes
 Reports
 Project/status meetings
 Client surveys (e.g. satisfaction level)
6.3. What is a Lifecycle
Model?
Definition.
A (software/system) lifecycle model is a
description of the sequence of activities
carried out in an SE project, and the relative
order of these activities.
It provides a fixed generic framework that
can be tailored to a specific project.
Project specific parameters will include:
 Size, (person-years)
 Budget,
 Duration.
project plan =
lifecycle model + project parameters
There are hundreds of different lifecycle
models
to choose from, e.g:
 waterfall,
 code-and-fix
 spiral
 rapid prototyping
 unified process (UP)
 agile methods, extreme programming (XP)
 COTS …
but many are minor variations on a smaller
number of basic models.
By changing the lifecycle model, we can
improve and/or tradeoff:
 Development speed (time to market)
 Product quality
 Project visibility
 Administrative overhead
 Risk exposure
 Customer relations, etc, etc.
Normally, a lifecycle model covers the entire
lifetime of a product.
From birth of a commercial idea
to final de-installation of last release
i.e. The three main phases:
 design,
 build,
 maintain.
Note that we can sometimes combine
lifecycle models,
e.g. waterfall inside evolutionary – onboard shuttle software
We can also change lifecycle model between
releases as a product matures,
e.g. rapid prototyping → waterfall
6.4. The Waterfall Model
• The waterfall model is the classic lifecycle
model – it is widely known, understood
and (commonly?) used.
• In some respect, waterfall is the ”common
sense” approach.
• Introduced by Royce 1970.
User Requirements
Software Requirements
Architecture Design
Detailed design & Coding
Testing
Delivery
The Waterfall
Lifecycle Workflow
Time
User Requirements Document
Software Requirements
Document
Architectural Design
Document
Detailed
Design
& Code
phase
output
”Swimming
upstream”
Advantages
1. Easy to understand and implement.
2. Widely used and known (in theory!)
3. Reinforces good habits: define-before-
design, design-before-code
4. Identifies deliverables and milestones
5. Document driven, URD, SRD, … etc.
Published documentation standards, e.g.
PSS-05.
6. Works well on mature products and weak
teams.
Disadvantages I
1. Idealised, doesn’t match reality well.
2. Doesn’t reflect iterative nature of exploratory
development.
3. Unrealistic to expect accurate requirements so
early in project
4. Software is delivered late in project, delays
discovery of serious errors.
Disadvantages II
5. Difficult to integrate risk management
6. Difficult and expensive to make changes
to documents, ”swimming upstream”.
7. Significant administrative overhead,
costly for small teams and projects.
6.5. Code-and-Fix
This model starts with an informal general
product idea and just develops code until a
product is ”ready” (or money or time runs
out). Work is in random order.
Corresponds with no plan! (Hacking!)
Advantages
1. No administrative overhead
2. Signs of progress (code) early.
3. Low expertise, anyone can use it!
4. Useful for small “proof of concept” projects, e.g.
as part of risk reduction.
Disadvantages
1. Dangerous!
1. No visibility/control
2. No resource planning
3. No deadlines
4. Mistakes hard to detect/correct
2. Impossible for large projects,
communication breakdown, chaos.
6.6. Spiral Model
Since end-user requirements are hard to
obtain/define, it is natural to develop software
in an experimental way: e.g.
1. Build some software
2. See if it meets customer requirements
3. If no goto 1 else stop.
This loop approach gives rise to structured
iterative lifecycle models.
In 1988 Boehm developed the spiral model as
an iterative model which includes risk
analysis and risk management.
Key idea: on each iteration identify and solve
the sub-problems with the highest risk.
Cumulative cost
Evaluate alternatives,
Identify & resolve risks
Develop & verify
next-level product
Plan next phase
Determine objectives,
alternatives & constraints
Review &
commitment
Prototypes
P1 P2 P3
Operational
PrototypeStart
End
Requirements
plan
Development
plan
Integration &
Test plan
Requirements
validation
Design,
Validation
& Verification
Detailed design
Coding
Unit & Integration
Testing
Acceptance
Testing
Concept
Of Operation
Each cycle follows a waterfall model by:
1. Determining objectives
2. Specifying constraints
3. Generating alternatives
4. Identifying risks
5. Resolving risks
6. Developing next-level product
7. Planning next cycle
Advantages
1. Realism: the model accurately reflects the
iterative nature of software development on
projects with unclear requirements
2. Flexible: incoporates the advantages of the
waterfal and rapid prototyping methods
3. Comprehensive model decreases risk
4. Good project visibility.
Disadvantages
 Needs technical expertise in risk analysis to really
work
 Model is poorly understood by non-technical
management, hence not so widely used
 Complicated model, needs competent
professional management. High administrative
overhead.
6.7. Rapid Prototyping
Key idea: Customers are non-technical and
usually don’t know what they want/can have.
Rapid prototyping emphasises requirements
analysis and validation, also called:
 customer oriented development,
 evolutionary prototyping
Requirements Capture
Quick Design
Build Prototype
Customer Evaluation of
Prototype
Engineer Final
Product
The Rapid
Prototype Workflow
Iterate
Advantages
1. Reduces risk of incorrect user requirements
2. Good where requirements are changing/uncommitted
3. Regular visible progress aids management
4. Supports early product marketing
Disadvantages I
1. An unstable/badly implemented prototype often
becomes the final product.
2. Requires extensive customer collaboration
 Costs customers money
 Needs committed customers
 Difficult to finish if customer withdraws
 May be too customer specific, no broad market
Disadvantages II
3. Difficult to know how long project will last
4. Easy to fall back into code-and-fix without
proper requirements analysis, design, customer
evaluation and feedback.
6.8. Agile (XP) Manifesto
XP = Extreme Programming emphasises:
 Individuals and interactions
 Over processes and tools
 Working software
 Over documentation
 Customer collaboration
 Over contract negotiation
 Responding to change
 Over following a plan
6.8.1. Agile Principles
(Summary)
 Continuous delivery of software
 Continuous collaboration with customer
 Continuous update according to changes
 Value participants and their interaction
 Simplicity in code, satisfy the spec
6.9. XP Practices
(Summary)
 Programming in pairs
 Test driven development
 Continuous planning, change , delivery
 Shared project metaphors, coding standards and
ownership of code
 No overtime! (Yeah right!)
Advantages
 Lightweight methods suit small-medium size
projects
 Produces good team cohesion
 Emphasises final product
 Iterative
 Test based approach to requirements and quality
assurance
Disadvantages
 Difficult to scale up to large projects where
documentation is essential
 Needs experience and skill if not to degenerate
into code-and-fix
 Programming pairs is costly
 Test case construction is a difficult and
specialised skill.
6.10. Unified Process (UP)
 Booch, Jacobson, Rumbaugh 1999.
 Lifetime of a software product in cycles:
 Birth, childhood, adulthood, old-age, death.
 Product maturity stages
 Each cycle has phases, culiminating in a new
release (c.f. Spiral model)
Inception Elaboration
ConstructionTransition
UP Lifecycle – single phase workflow
(drawn as a UML Statechart!)
 Inception – identify core use cases, and use to make
architecture and design tradeoffs. Estimate and schedule
project from derived knowledge.
 Elaboration – capture detailed user requirements. Make
detailed design, decide on build vs. buy.
 Construction – components are bought or built, and
integrated.
 Transition – release a mature version that satisfies
acceptance criteria.
Unified Process
Software Lifecycle
Cycle
Phase
Iteration
Artifact
Workflow
Management
Environment
Requirements
Design
Implementation
Assessment
Deployment
*
*
Inception
Elaboration
Construction
Transition
*
*
4
Product
releases
Use Case Model
Analysis Model
Design Model
Deployment Model
Implementation Model
Test Model
specified by
realised by
deployed by implemented by
verified by
All models are interdepedent
but this only shown for use
case model
UML class diagram!
6.11. COTS
 COTS =
Commercial Off-The-Shelf software
 Engineer together a solution from existing
commercial software packages using minimal
software ”glue”.
 E.g. using databases, spread sheets, word
proccessors, graphics software, web browsers,
etc.
Advantages
 Fast, cheap solution
 May give all the basic functionality
 Well defined project, easy to run
Disadvantages
 Limited functionality
 Licensing problems, freeware, shareware, etc.
 License fees, maintainance fees, upgrade
compatibility problems

More Related Content

What's hot

Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710
Nikhil Todkar
 
Risk Driven Testing
Risk Driven TestingRisk Driven Testing
Risk Driven Testing
Jorge Boria
 
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scaleImproving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
IBM Rational software
 
OO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
OO Development 2 - Software Development MethodologiesOO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
OO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
Randy Connolly
 
R.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
R.A.D. - Rapid Application DevelopmentR.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
R.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
Mediotype .
 
sdlc life cycle
sdlc life cyclesdlc life cycle
sdlc life cycle
yogesh paghdal
 
Software Development Life Cycle
Software Development Life CycleSoftware Development Life Cycle
Software Development Life Cycle
Dr. ARUP ABHINNA ACHARYA
 
Software development slides
Software development slidesSoftware development slides
Software development slides
iarthur
 
Embedded Design
Embedded Design Embedded Design
Embedded Design
AJAL A J
 
Software models
Software modelsSoftware models
Software models
MOULA HUSSAIN KHATTHEWALE
 
What Is the Rational Unified Process
What Is the Rational Unified ProcessWhat Is the Rational Unified Process
What Is the Rational Unified Process
Robson Silva Espig
 
Fromscrumtokanbantowardlean
FromscrumtokanbantowardleanFromscrumtokanbantowardlean
Fromscrumtokanbantowardlean
Luca Aliberti
 
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTMODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
PaYal Umraliya
 
Dynamic System Development Method
Dynamic System Development MethodDynamic System Development Method
Dynamic System Development Method
Baguio Central University
 
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLEEDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
Sabeel Irshad
 
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
HASEEB MUGHAL
 
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTE
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTEProject management chapter_04 for MSBTE
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTE
Kalyan Ingole
 
Agile and XP
Agile and XPAgile and XP
Agile and XP
Vishwas Sutar
 
CSC426 - SDLC Models
CSC426 - SDLC ModelsCSC426 - SDLC Models
CSC426 - SDLC Models
Bro Shola Ajayi
 
Project Management Concepts
Project Management ConceptsProject Management Concepts
Project Management Concepts
Saqib Raza
 

What's hot (20)

Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710Pm soln9416141129710
Pm soln9416141129710
 
Risk Driven Testing
Risk Driven TestingRisk Driven Testing
Risk Driven Testing
 
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scaleImproving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
Improving software economics - Top 10 principles of achieving agility at scale
 
OO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
OO Development 2 - Software Development MethodologiesOO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
OO Development 2 - Software Development Methodologies
 
R.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
R.A.D. - Rapid Application DevelopmentR.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
R.A.D. - Rapid Application Development
 
sdlc life cycle
sdlc life cyclesdlc life cycle
sdlc life cycle
 
Software Development Life Cycle
Software Development Life CycleSoftware Development Life Cycle
Software Development Life Cycle
 
Software development slides
Software development slidesSoftware development slides
Software development slides
 
Embedded Design
Embedded Design Embedded Design
Embedded Design
 
Software models
Software modelsSoftware models
Software models
 
What Is the Rational Unified Process
What Is the Rational Unified ProcessWhat Is the Rational Unified Process
What Is the Rational Unified Process
 
Fromscrumtokanbantowardlean
FromscrumtokanbantowardleanFromscrumtokanbantowardlean
Fromscrumtokanbantowardlean
 
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTMODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
MODELS USED IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
 
Dynamic System Development Method
Dynamic System Development MethodDynamic System Development Method
Dynamic System Development Method
 
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLEEDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
EDLC-EMBEDDED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
 
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
 
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTE
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTEProject management chapter_04 for MSBTE
Project management chapter_04 for MSBTE
 
Agile and XP
Agile and XPAgile and XP
Agile and XP
 
CSC426 - SDLC Models
CSC426 - SDLC ModelsCSC426 - SDLC Models
CSC426 - SDLC Models
 
Project Management Concepts
Project Management ConceptsProject Management Concepts
Project Management Concepts
 

Viewers also liked

Software life cycle comparison
Software life cycle comparisonSoftware life cycle comparison
Software life cycle comparison
Suvek Shakya
 
STX_SU11_Magazine
STX_SU11_MagazineSTX_SU11_Magazine
STX_SU11_Magazine
Eric Barnes
 
Top 8 math specialist resume samples
Top 8 math specialist resume samplesTop 8 math specialist resume samples
Top 8 math specialist resume samples
tonychoper6605
 
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETACUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
Dulce P. Calderón
 
Planning and Prevention
Planning and PreventionPlanning and Prevention
Planning and Prevention
Eloine Ashmore
 
Himpunan
HimpunanHimpunan
Himpunan
085746355268
 
Resume new
Resume newResume new
Resume new
Abhishek Jaiswal
 
Populasi dan Sampel
Populasi dan SampelPopulasi dan Sampel
Populasi dan Sampel
085746355268
 
Untitled Presentation
Untitled PresentationUntitled Presentation
Untitled Presentation
Ignacio Rippa
 
EN_T-Time 1 2015
EN_T-Time 1 2015EN_T-Time 1 2015
EN_T-Time 1 2015
Gary M. Gladysz, PhD
 
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
AnastasiyaF
 
Credit clerk performance appraisal
Credit clerk performance appraisalCredit clerk performance appraisal
Credit clerk performance appraisal
kyleannie435
 
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhất
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt NhấtUống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhất
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhấtligia310
 
CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
 CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI... CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
nexgentechnology
 
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Open Educational Resources  (OER)Open Educational Resources  (OER)
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Anne Mulligan-Sund
 
Distribution clerk performance appraisal
Distribution clerk performance appraisalDistribution clerk performance appraisal
Distribution clerk performance appraisal
kyleannie435
 
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial InterpolationSpace-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
nexgentechnology
 
wri brochure
wri brochurewri brochure
wri brochure
Lance Hall
 
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار مغاغة - العدوة )
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار  مغاغة - العدوة )قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار  مغاغة - العدوة )
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار مغاغة - العدوة )
Nour Elbader
 

Viewers also liked (19)

Software life cycle comparison
Software life cycle comparisonSoftware life cycle comparison
Software life cycle comparison
 
STX_SU11_Magazine
STX_SU11_MagazineSTX_SU11_Magazine
STX_SU11_Magazine
 
Top 8 math specialist resume samples
Top 8 math specialist resume samplesTop 8 math specialist resume samples
Top 8 math specialist resume samples
 
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETACUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
CUIDEMOS NUESTRO PLANETA
 
Planning and Prevention
Planning and PreventionPlanning and Prevention
Planning and Prevention
 
Himpunan
HimpunanHimpunan
Himpunan
 
Resume new
Resume newResume new
Resume new
 
Populasi dan Sampel
Populasi dan SampelPopulasi dan Sampel
Populasi dan Sampel
 
Untitled Presentation
Untitled PresentationUntitled Presentation
Untitled Presentation
 
EN_T-Time 1 2015
EN_T-Time 1 2015EN_T-Time 1 2015
EN_T-Time 1 2015
 
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
Грамадска палітычнае жыццё БССР у 1945-53 гг. Адукацыя і навука.
 
Credit clerk performance appraisal
Credit clerk performance appraisalCredit clerk performance appraisal
Credit clerk performance appraisal
 
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhất
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt NhấtUống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhất
Uống Thuốc Gì Chữa Trị Bốc Hỏa Tốt Nhất
 
CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
 CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI... CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
CONTROL CLOUD DATA ACCESS PRIVILEGE AND ANONYMITY WITH FULLY ANONYMOUS ATTRI...
 
Open Educational Resources (OER)
Open Educational Resources  (OER)Open Educational Resources  (OER)
Open Educational Resources (OER)
 
Distribution clerk performance appraisal
Distribution clerk performance appraisalDistribution clerk performance appraisal
Distribution clerk performance appraisal
 
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial InterpolationSpace-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
Space-efficient Verifiable Secret Sharing Using Polynomial Interpolation
 
wri brochure
wri brochurewri brochure
wri brochure
 
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار مغاغة - العدوة )
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار  مغاغة - العدوة )قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار  مغاغة - العدوة )
قطاع الشمال ( بني مزار مغاغة - العدوة )
 

Similar to Software Life Cylce Model

2
22
reaserch ppt.pptx
reaserch ppt.pptxreaserch ppt.pptx
reaserch ppt.pptx
BinyamBekele3
 
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docxDiscussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
madlynplamondon
 
Introduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringIntroduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software Engineering
Saqib Raza
 
Software development process models
Software development process modelsSoftware development process models
Software development process models
Muhammed Afsal Villan
 
Incremental model
Incremental modelIncremental model
Incremental model
Sajid Ali Laghari
 
An overview of software development methodologies.
An overview of software development methodologies.An overview of software development methodologies.
An overview of software development methodologies.
Masoud Kalali
 
Software process model
Software process modelSoftware process model
Software process model
Muhammad Yousuf Abdul Qadir
 
Unified Process
Unified Process Unified Process
Unified Process
ramyaranjith
 
01lifecycles
01lifecycles01lifecycles
01lifecycles
Abdihakim Dalmar
 
Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3
Hardik Patel
 
Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3
Priyanka Shetty
 
Faisal Incremental Model
Faisal Incremental ModelFaisal Incremental Model
Faisal Incremental Model
Federal Urdu University
 
Lifecycle Model
Lifecycle ModelLifecycle Model
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
JayeshPatil149
 
Software process life cycles
Software process life cyclesSoftware process life cycles
Software process life cycles
sathish sak
 
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Compare Infobase Limited
 
Software Development Life Cycle Part II
Software Development Life Cycle Part IISoftware Development Life Cycle Part II
Software Development Life Cycle Part II
Compare Infobase Limited
 
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.pptIntroduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
Mohan Late
 
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
SuhleemAhmd
 

Similar to Software Life Cylce Model (20)

2
22
2
 
reaserch ppt.pptx
reaserch ppt.pptxreaserch ppt.pptx
reaserch ppt.pptx
 
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docxDiscussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docx
 
Introduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringIntroduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software Engineering
 
Software development process models
Software development process modelsSoftware development process models
Software development process models
 
Incremental model
Incremental modelIncremental model
Incremental model
 
An overview of software development methodologies.
An overview of software development methodologies.An overview of software development methodologies.
An overview of software development methodologies.
 
Software process model
Software process modelSoftware process model
Software process model
 
Unified Process
Unified Process Unified Process
Unified Process
 
01lifecycles
01lifecycles01lifecycles
01lifecycles
 
Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3
 
Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3Slides chapter 3
Slides chapter 3
 
Faisal Incremental Model
Faisal Incremental ModelFaisal Incremental Model
Faisal Incremental Model
 
Lifecycle Model
Lifecycle ModelLifecycle Model
Lifecycle Model
 
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
 
Software process life cycles
Software process life cyclesSoftware process life cycles
Software process life cycles
 
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
 
Software Development Life Cycle Part II
Software Development Life Cycle Part IISoftware Development Life Cycle Part II
Software Development Life Cycle Part II
 
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.pptIntroduction to Scrum.ppt
Introduction to Scrum.ppt
 
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
61f4fc87-9977-4003-baf8-37f13200977b.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
sonjaschweigert1
 
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdfData structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
TIPNGVN2
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Adtran
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Aggregage
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Alpen-Adria-Universität
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
DianaGray10
 
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
James Anderson
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Uni Systems S.M.S.A.
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Kumud Singh
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
KatiaHIMEUR1
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
Alex Pruden
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
danishmna97
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
DanBrown980551
 
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
ThomasParaiso2
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Safe Software
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
Neo4j
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Neo4j
 
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase TeamPCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
ControlCase
 

Recently uploaded (20)

A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...
 
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdfData structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
Data structures and Algorithms in Python.pdf
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
 
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
 
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
 
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
 
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase TeamPCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
PCI PIN Basics Webinar from the Controlcase Team
 

Software Life Cylce Model

  • 1. 6. Software Lifecycle Models A software lifecycle model is a standardised format for  planning  organising, and  running a new development project.
  • 2. Hundreds of different kinds of models are known and used. Many are minor variations on just a small number of basic models. In this section we:  survey the main types of model, and  consider how to choose between them.
  • 3. 6.1. Planning with Models SE projects usually live with a fixed financial budget. (An exception is maintainance?) Additionally, time-to-market places a strong time constraint. There will be other project constraints such as staff.
  • 5. Project planning is the art of scheduling the necessary activities, in time, space and across staff in order to optimise:  project risk [low] (see later)  profit [high]  customer satisfaction [high]  worker satisfaction [high]  long-term company goals
  • 6. Questions: 1. What are these necessary activities? (besides programming) 2. Are there good patterns of organisation that we could copy?
  • 7. A project plan contains much information, but must at least describe:  resources needed (people, money, equipment, etc)  dependency & timing of work (flow graph, work packages)  rate of delivery (reports, code, etc) It is impossible to measure rate of progress except with reference to a plan.
  • 8. In addition to project members, the following may need access to parts of the project plan:  Management,  Customers  Subcontractors  Suppliers  Investors  Banks
  • 9. 6.2. Project Visibility Unlike other engineers (e.g. civil, electronic, chemical … etc.) software engineers do not produce anything physical. It is inherently difficult to monitor an SE project due to lack of visibility.
  • 10. This means that SE projects must produce additional deliverables (artifacts) which are visible, such as:  Design documents/ prototypes  Reports  Project/status meetings  Client surveys (e.g. satisfaction level)
  • 11. 6.3. What is a Lifecycle Model? Definition. A (software/system) lifecycle model is a description of the sequence of activities carried out in an SE project, and the relative order of these activities.
  • 12. It provides a fixed generic framework that can be tailored to a specific project. Project specific parameters will include:  Size, (person-years)  Budget,  Duration. project plan = lifecycle model + project parameters
  • 13. There are hundreds of different lifecycle models to choose from, e.g:  waterfall,  code-and-fix  spiral  rapid prototyping  unified process (UP)  agile methods, extreme programming (XP)  COTS … but many are minor variations on a smaller number of basic models.
  • 14. By changing the lifecycle model, we can improve and/or tradeoff:  Development speed (time to market)  Product quality  Project visibility  Administrative overhead  Risk exposure  Customer relations, etc, etc.
  • 15. Normally, a lifecycle model covers the entire lifetime of a product. From birth of a commercial idea to final de-installation of last release i.e. The three main phases:  design,  build,  maintain.
  • 16. Note that we can sometimes combine lifecycle models, e.g. waterfall inside evolutionary – onboard shuttle software We can also change lifecycle model between releases as a product matures, e.g. rapid prototyping → waterfall
  • 17. 6.4. The Waterfall Model • The waterfall model is the classic lifecycle model – it is widely known, understood and (commonly?) used. • In some respect, waterfall is the ”common sense” approach. • Introduced by Royce 1970.
  • 18. User Requirements Software Requirements Architecture Design Detailed design & Coding Testing Delivery The Waterfall Lifecycle Workflow Time User Requirements Document Software Requirements Document Architectural Design Document Detailed Design & Code phase output ”Swimming upstream”
  • 19. Advantages 1. Easy to understand and implement. 2. Widely used and known (in theory!) 3. Reinforces good habits: define-before- design, design-before-code 4. Identifies deliverables and milestones 5. Document driven, URD, SRD, … etc. Published documentation standards, e.g. PSS-05. 6. Works well on mature products and weak teams.
  • 20. Disadvantages I 1. Idealised, doesn’t match reality well. 2. Doesn’t reflect iterative nature of exploratory development. 3. Unrealistic to expect accurate requirements so early in project 4. Software is delivered late in project, delays discovery of serious errors.
  • 21. Disadvantages II 5. Difficult to integrate risk management 6. Difficult and expensive to make changes to documents, ”swimming upstream”. 7. Significant administrative overhead, costly for small teams and projects.
  • 22. 6.5. Code-and-Fix This model starts with an informal general product idea and just develops code until a product is ”ready” (or money or time runs out). Work is in random order. Corresponds with no plan! (Hacking!)
  • 23. Advantages 1. No administrative overhead 2. Signs of progress (code) early. 3. Low expertise, anyone can use it! 4. Useful for small “proof of concept” projects, e.g. as part of risk reduction.
  • 24. Disadvantages 1. Dangerous! 1. No visibility/control 2. No resource planning 3. No deadlines 4. Mistakes hard to detect/correct 2. Impossible for large projects, communication breakdown, chaos.
  • 25. 6.6. Spiral Model Since end-user requirements are hard to obtain/define, it is natural to develop software in an experimental way: e.g. 1. Build some software 2. See if it meets customer requirements 3. If no goto 1 else stop.
  • 26. This loop approach gives rise to structured iterative lifecycle models. In 1988 Boehm developed the spiral model as an iterative model which includes risk analysis and risk management. Key idea: on each iteration identify and solve the sub-problems with the highest risk.
  • 27. Cumulative cost Evaluate alternatives, Identify & resolve risks Develop & verify next-level product Plan next phase Determine objectives, alternatives & constraints Review & commitment Prototypes P1 P2 P3 Operational PrototypeStart End Requirements plan Development plan Integration & Test plan Requirements validation Design, Validation & Verification Detailed design Coding Unit & Integration Testing Acceptance Testing Concept Of Operation
  • 28. Each cycle follows a waterfall model by: 1. Determining objectives 2. Specifying constraints 3. Generating alternatives 4. Identifying risks 5. Resolving risks 6. Developing next-level product 7. Planning next cycle
  • 29. Advantages 1. Realism: the model accurately reflects the iterative nature of software development on projects with unclear requirements 2. Flexible: incoporates the advantages of the waterfal and rapid prototyping methods 3. Comprehensive model decreases risk 4. Good project visibility.
  • 30. Disadvantages  Needs technical expertise in risk analysis to really work  Model is poorly understood by non-technical management, hence not so widely used  Complicated model, needs competent professional management. High administrative overhead.
  • 31. 6.7. Rapid Prototyping Key idea: Customers are non-technical and usually don’t know what they want/can have. Rapid prototyping emphasises requirements analysis and validation, also called:  customer oriented development,  evolutionary prototyping
  • 32. Requirements Capture Quick Design Build Prototype Customer Evaluation of Prototype Engineer Final Product The Rapid Prototype Workflow Iterate
  • 33. Advantages 1. Reduces risk of incorrect user requirements 2. Good where requirements are changing/uncommitted 3. Regular visible progress aids management 4. Supports early product marketing
  • 34. Disadvantages I 1. An unstable/badly implemented prototype often becomes the final product. 2. Requires extensive customer collaboration  Costs customers money  Needs committed customers  Difficult to finish if customer withdraws  May be too customer specific, no broad market
  • 35. Disadvantages II 3. Difficult to know how long project will last 4. Easy to fall back into code-and-fix without proper requirements analysis, design, customer evaluation and feedback.
  • 36. 6.8. Agile (XP) Manifesto XP = Extreme Programming emphasises:  Individuals and interactions  Over processes and tools  Working software  Over documentation  Customer collaboration  Over contract negotiation  Responding to change  Over following a plan
  • 37. 6.8.1. Agile Principles (Summary)  Continuous delivery of software  Continuous collaboration with customer  Continuous update according to changes  Value participants and their interaction  Simplicity in code, satisfy the spec
  • 38. 6.9. XP Practices (Summary)  Programming in pairs  Test driven development  Continuous planning, change , delivery  Shared project metaphors, coding standards and ownership of code  No overtime! (Yeah right!)
  • 39. Advantages  Lightweight methods suit small-medium size projects  Produces good team cohesion  Emphasises final product  Iterative  Test based approach to requirements and quality assurance
  • 40. Disadvantages  Difficult to scale up to large projects where documentation is essential  Needs experience and skill if not to degenerate into code-and-fix  Programming pairs is costly  Test case construction is a difficult and specialised skill.
  • 41. 6.10. Unified Process (UP)  Booch, Jacobson, Rumbaugh 1999.  Lifetime of a software product in cycles:  Birth, childhood, adulthood, old-age, death.  Product maturity stages  Each cycle has phases, culiminating in a new release (c.f. Spiral model)
  • 42. Inception Elaboration ConstructionTransition UP Lifecycle – single phase workflow (drawn as a UML Statechart!)
  • 43.  Inception – identify core use cases, and use to make architecture and design tradeoffs. Estimate and schedule project from derived knowledge.  Elaboration – capture detailed user requirements. Make detailed design, decide on build vs. buy.  Construction – components are bought or built, and integrated.  Transition – release a mature version that satisfies acceptance criteria.
  • 45. Use Case Model Analysis Model Design Model Deployment Model Implementation Model Test Model specified by realised by deployed by implemented by verified by All models are interdepedent but this only shown for use case model UML class diagram!
  • 46. 6.11. COTS  COTS = Commercial Off-The-Shelf software  Engineer together a solution from existing commercial software packages using minimal software ”glue”.  E.g. using databases, spread sheets, word proccessors, graphics software, web browsers, etc.
  • 47. Advantages  Fast, cheap solution  May give all the basic functionality  Well defined project, easy to run Disadvantages  Limited functionality  Licensing problems, freeware, shareware, etc.  License fees, maintainance fees, upgrade compatibility problems