1. Atlanta Federal Executive Board
Leadership Government Program
PROPOSAL TO CREATE
A FEDERAL GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
TO BENEFIT METRO ATLANTA
Atlanta Federal Center
August 15, 2012
2. Survey Distribution and Respondents
• 10 Federal Agencies with an impact on
Green Infrastructure (GI) in the Metro
Atlanta Area
• Respondents included:
– EPA - Brownfields, CDC, GSA, USDA
- Forrest Service, Federal Highway
Administration, U.S. Fish &Wildlife
Service, EPA- Stormwater, USDA –
National Resources Conservation
Service and HUD.
• Percentages were calculated from the
total number of respondents
2
3. Participant GI Definition Analysis
• 9 Responses – 9 different
definitions of Green
Infrastructure
• All respondents have a 22%
11%
different view of what GI
Products
is and how to address it. Services
33% Environment
• Adopting a broader view Combination
of GI can help everyone 33%
work together to address
GI in a way that meets all
stakeholders needs.
3
4. GI Continuum
Landscape Regional Site specific
EPA EPA
FS FWS FHWA CDC Brownfields HUD Stormwater GSA
Forest Service (FS)
Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS)
Federal Highway Administration (FWHA)
Centers For Disease Control (CDC)
EPA – Brownfields (EPA-BF)
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD)
GSA
EPA – Stormwater
Preservation / Low Impact Site
Conservation Development
Note: Based on Initial Survey
4
5. Current Needs Identified in Survey
• Continued Support and GI Education
• Help identifying other agencies and organizations with funding
and authority to apply GI
• “Spread the word”
• Leads on material, resources and ideas
• Water and Wetland Mitigation techniques
• Stable Funding
• Planning models that inventory sensitive lands and buffer them
to support synergistic public infrastructure
• Storm water detention designed as community space
5
6. GI Essential Ecological Services -
The Basic Infrastructure of All Life
• Green Infrastructure is a critical and basic step to achieve
Sustainable Development
• Nature’s Ecological Services
–Recharge Groundwater
–Clean Air
–Clean Water
–Plants for Pollinators
–Etc.
6
7. Is Our Current Land Development
Approach Sustainable?
As we develop, tracks of undisturbed nature become fragmented.
Ecosystem services are undermined in highly urbanized settings.
Undeveloped Land
95-100% nature
Developed Atlanta
85-95% Impervious
7
8. Impacts of Current Land Development
Practices
Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA
Urban Streams do not meet
Clean Water Act Goals
of Fishable and Swimmable
Incised, Unstable Banks - Commonplace with
Urban Streams - Substantial Erosion
9. Impacts of Current Land Development
Practices
Impacts of Metro Atlanta’s Growth and Increasing Impervious Surfaces
Historic Flooding of 2009
– Stress for Residents
– Damage to Metro Atlanta’s Economy
9
10. Impacts of Current Land Development
Practices
• Lake Lanier - Reduced Infiltration (Imperviousness!)
• Less Groundwater Recharge
• Drought Conditions Worse
• Worries about Drinking Water Supply
10
14. What is Green Infrastructure?
Green Infrastructure (GI) is strategically planned and
managed networks of green space that protect ecosystem
values and functions through an array of products,
technologies, and practices.
GI conserves or mimics natural processes to ensure the
provision of basic services provided by nature.
The continuum of GI includes practices at the individual
project site, neighborhood and regional scale.
14
15. In Addition to Essential Ecological
Services: Social and Economic Benefits
GI Benefits to Metro Atlanta –“significant with tremendous opportunities”
Social Benefits Economic Benefits
• Improved quality of life • Reduced costs for treating
• Better public health drinking water
• Increased recreation • Increased efficiencies in
opportunities agencies working together
• Reduced flooding • Reduced Utility Bills
• Increased Real Estate Values
• Reduced Dependency on Cars
Triple Bottom Line Benefits: Environmental, Social and Economic
15
17. What is the Federal Green Infrastructure
Community of Practice?
• Self-selected federal staffs, informally come together, to share
expertise and passion for learning about and contributing to
efforts to incorporate GI at all scales to benefit the City of
Atlanta.
• The intrinsic value is in meeting to share information, discuss
and solve problems, develop new ideas, leverage resources, and
build relationships with peers who share common goals and
objectives.
• The community of practice continues as long as interest is
expressed.
17
18. Why Develop a Green Infrastructure
Community of Practice?
Broaden discussion to educate practitioners about all scales of
Green Infrastructure
– All scales produce a similar outcome - "a place for nature -
natural system processes to provide ecological services”
Breakdown the stovepipe mentality
– Find and seek opportunities to tie different efforts together
Change in approach needs to be widespread.
– Atlanta's efforts will encourage others to adopt
18
19. Bridge the Barriers of
Traditional Disciplinary Boundaries
Comprehensive, integrated and strategic approach to land use decision making
AIR WATER SOIL LIFE
Architects - Civil Engineers - Landscape Architects- Ecologists - Planners
Architects Civil Engineers Landscape Architects Ecologists Planners …
19
20. Benefits of a Community of Practice
• Fosters peer to peer information exchange and
learning among members
• Promotes a consistent approach and terminology
• Encourages Federal coordination, collaboration and
cooperation on plans, strategies and policies
• Reduces duplication and increases partnerships
• Encourages new ideas and innovation
• Understanding funding sources
20
21. Atlanta is Adopting
Green Infrastructure Practices
Atlanta City Hall Green Roof Atlanta Fire Station #16 Rain Garden
Fernbanks Rain Garden Serenbe Low Impact Community
21
22. Next Steps
• Meet others working on this topic and create a network of
practitioners
• Identify Topics for Discussion including developing a common
terminology
• Educate federal agencies and their staffs about what GI is, how
it works
• Share information
• Develop a steering committee with rotating leadership so
ownership is shared
• Focus the COP on the City of Atlanta - gain experience working
together here will translate into working together in other
locations
22
23. Next Steps – Website and Environmental
Directory
23
24. Next Steps
• How to get involved – ideally it would be great for
one person from each agency to be on the team; the
hosting of the meeting would ideally rotate between
agencies involved
– Formulate how meetings would work…enjoyable,
meaningful, productive
– Create an agenda—what other agencies are doing
– Establish logistic for CoP and methods for
communication
– Quarterly Meetings
24
Editor's Notes
What the purpose of the presentation is.
FEB Green Team prepared and distributed a survey to understand status of GI work by Federal Agencies.
Definitions differed due to focus on different aspects of the GI continuum – different stovepipes. Adopting a broader view also help people “get” that nature and systems that mimic nature need to be thought about in all future land use decisions.Products – FHWAServices – CDC, EPA (SW), HUDEnvironment – FWS, FS, NRCSCombination / not everything – EPA (BF), GSAAll – 0
Here are the recipient responses and note because EPA participants works on stormwater “green infrastructure” best management practices, they did not report out the work done on Low Impact Development through the Sustainable Communities program of EPA, HUD and DOT. This data supports the need to broaden our definition of green infrastructure.
Stable funding sources that provide for the long range planning of green infrastructure systems – positioned to include water management, parks, trails, greenways, sidewalks with planting strips adequate for mature canopy trees, outreach to the design/development community and environmental education. Construction material resources and ideas are always beneficial. Water and wetland mitigation techniques can further our partners understanding.All respondents seem to have similar challenges:FundingResourcesEducation
Green Infrastructure was first used by the conservation/preservationists to discuss the need to recognize that essential infrastructure for ecological functions will only be available if we leave a critical mass of undisturbed nature to provide them. Mark A. Benedict, Edward T. McMahon, The Conservation Fund wrote the book. Fragmentation caused by development patterns eliminates natural systems that provide clean air, clean water and clean land resources. The stormwater folks co-opted the term for use as a best management practice for the management of stormwater – green roofs, rain gardens, cisterns, etc. Conclusion: Society needs green infrastructure as much as it needs roads and sewer systems.
Downtown Connector Flooded 2009
Drought
This series of three slides shows housing density in the Southern United States in 1970, 2000 and predicted for 2030.
Growth in Georgia2000 -2010 GA gained 1.5 million new residents Regional Water Planning 2009-2011
With this projected population growth, it is clear that a new paradigm to land use development is necessary to ensure Sustainable Communities. The land use decision making process at the site, neighborhood and regional scales need to be integrated to ensure that basicEcological services are maintained.
In order to begin integrating our green infrastructure work we have provided a broad definition that includes all aspects of the work being understaken. And we propose the formation of a Federal Green Infrastructure Community of Practice.
In addition to the environmental benefits Metro Atlanta will also benefit socially and economically from incorporating green infrastructure in our land use decision making.
Here is academic research showing that including green infrastructure in land use decision making is less expensive.How is monetary value assigned to an ecosystem service? Environmentalists and economists frequently suggest that there would be a greater incentive for environmental stewardship if ecosystem services were valued in a manner that reflects the large contribution they have to our economy and society. Assigning a monetary value to a particular service can be very complicated due to issues of scale and the complexity of ecological interactions that make isolating the economic effects of one service difficult. Although challenging, valuation is seen as essential for encouraging conservation. Economists have developed innovative methods that attempt to quantify ecosystem services and the economic benefits of conservation. Instead of developing values for individual landscape features, such as a wetland, a healthy stream reach or headwaters, many economists have found that holistic valuation techniques that monetize a range of services provided by a landscape to be a more effective communication tool. At times, value is measured indirectly through payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs that compensate landowners for conserving land so that others may benefit from the multitude of ecosystem services the land supplies. Value can also be estimated by citizen’s willingness to pay (WTP) to use or protect a land area or ecosystem service. Another common indirect valuation method is the estimation of avoided costs to society due to protection activities. Cost avoidance scenarios are used to communicate the costs associated with losing ecosystem services and replacing them. These scenarios are commonly used to show costs saved from the prevention of flood damage or impairments that would occur if a floodplain was not intact.
The only requirement for participation is interest in this effort.
Key practicitioners to engage.
We seek to facilitate the adoption of GI in the Greater Atlanta Region through greater Federal Agency communication, coordination, and collaboration by creating a GI Community of Practice to: Foster peer to peer information exchange and learning among membersPromote a consistent approach and terminologyEncourage Federal coordination, collaboration and cooperation on plans, strategies and policiesReduce duplication and increase partnershipsEncourage new ideas and innovation
Fernback Rain Garden Educational SignageCity Hall’s Green RoofAtlanta Federal Center’s Green RoofFire Station #16 Rain Garden – Proctor Creekhttp://www.serenbecommunity.com/serenbeoverview.htmlAtlanta’s Mayor has the goal of being a Sustainable City.
We seek to facilitate the adoption of GI in the Greater Atlanta Region through greater Federal Agency communication, coordination, and collaboration by creating a GI Community of Practice to: Foster peer to peer information exchange and learning among membersPromote a consistent approach and terminologyEncourage Federal coordination, collaboration and cooperation on plans, strategies and policiesReduce duplication and increase partnershipsEncourage new ideas and innovation