Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Nile Basin Development Challenge: Rainwater management systems


Published on

Presented by Tilahun Amede — Nile BDC 'Platforms' Workshop, Addis Ababa, April 8, 2011.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Nile Basin Development Challenge: Rainwater management systems

  1. 1. Nile Basin Development Challenge: Rainwater Management Systems Nile BDC Workshop, Addis Ababa April 8, 2011 Tilahun Amede and Team Nile Basin Leader
  2. 2. CPWF Consortium Members AREO
  3. 3. Phase 2
  4. 4. Basin Development Challenges (BDCs) <ul><li>Andes – Benefit sharing mechanisms </li></ul><ul><li>Ganges – intensification in coastal areas </li></ul><ul><li>Limpopo – rainwater management and water access </li></ul><ul><li>Mekong – dams, reservoirs and livelihoods </li></ul><ul><li>Nile – rainwater management in landscapes </li></ul><ul><li>Volta – rainwater management and small reservoirs To improve rural livelihoods and their resilience through a landscape approach to rainwater management </li></ul>
  5. 5. SSA’s dependence on rainwater agriculture
  6. 6. Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) <ul><li>NBDC research will focus on the Ethiopian highlands and will examine the interrelated issues of rainwater management at Landscape and Sub-basin scales; </li></ul><ul><li>Understanding causes and its consequences of low rainwater productivity; </li></ul><ul><li>Innovations for improving rainwater management systems; addressing poverty, vulnerability and resources degradation in the basin. </li></ul><ul><li>Managing rainfall variability; increased water storage; </li></ul><ul><li>Crop and livestock water productivity; </li></ul><ul><li>Minimizing land degradation and downstream siltation of water storage infrastructure, increased biomass; </li></ul><ul><li>Resilient communities and systems that will manage climatic and market shocks </li></ul>
  7. 7. Nile BDC Rainwater Management Systems
  8. 8. Landscape from NBDC perspective?
  9. 9. What is ‘RWMs at Landscape’? <ul><li>Capturing, storing and efficient utilization of water </li></ul><ul><li>Protect irrigation schemes; water quality and quantity; </li></ul><ul><li>Coordinate cross-Community cooperation of diverse water user groups; </li></ul><ul><li>Address NRM issues that cannot be addressed by single farmers; </li></ul><ul><li>Co-management of common NRM resources (e.g. conflict management); </li></ul><ul><li>Exploiting interface between diverse social and biophysical processes (i.e. water, soil, livestock, crops, pests, sedimentation) at landscape / basin. </li></ul>
  10. 10. R&D actors, communities, policy makers and others jointly achieve a sustainable and economically viable watershed with improved resource quality, minimized resource loss and improved economic benefits & livelihoods
  11. 11. Improvement through well-targeted combinations of technologies, up-scaling ‘best bets’, policies and institutions, understanding of downstream & cross-scale consequences, facilitating learning, collective action, commitment to change <ul><li>Nile 1: On learning from the past; </li></ul><ul><li>Nile 2: On integrated rainwater management strategies – technologies, institutions and policies; </li></ul><ul><li>Nile 3: On targeting and scaling out </li></ul><ul><li>Nile 4: On assessing and anticipating consequences of innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Nile 5: Nile Coordination and Change </li></ul>
  12. 12. Linkages Sub-regional Landscape Farm level Impact Learning Communication Nile 5. Coordination / change Nile 4. Consequences, impact, tradeoffs Nile 2. Innovations, technologies , practices Nile 3. Mapping, targeting. Up-scaling Nile 1. Inventory and synthesis Linkages Linkages
  13. 13. <ul><li>Participatory M&E framework will be used to monitor and evaluate progress and make adjustments; </li></ul><ul><li>Generic indicators against which the activities and expected results will be measured; </li></ul><ul><li>Development of common reporting formats allowing teams to better share lessons; </li></ul><ul><li>Schedules for project specific evaluations will be agreed and evaluation studies on cross cutting issues including gender, social preferences will be jointly carried out; </li></ul><ul><li>Capacity building (inc gender, M&E) will be built both into the whole co-ordination and project implementation, individual activities based on a needs assessment. </li></ul>Strongly interlinked NBDC projects
  14. 14. NBDC working principles <ul><li>Strong partnership; range of partners, larger network and linkages </li></ul><ul><li>Interdisciplinary research; disciplines and institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Capacity building; mentoring, facilitating </li></ul><ul><li>Gender and diversity; ability to participate in and derive benefit from water </li></ul><ul><li>Learning, documentation and communication </li></ul><ul><li>Innovation for action </li></ul>
  15. 15. Market incentives for Landscape Management
  16. 16. Value-Addition by NBDC <ul><li>Farm level </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Participatory, integrated research approaches </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strategic entry points (‘turn keys’) on farm </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Linkages among system components </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Landscape level </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Integrated research approaches (including water, land, vegetation, crop, livestock and other common property resources as components) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strategic entry points (‘turn keys’) in landscapes, communities (increasing water storage for fruit production creates community enthusiasm and investments in landscapes around springs, etc.) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collective action & negotiated land and water use practices ( drainage, niche compatibility in agroforestry, spring management, livestock grazing) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>By-laws and institutional change in support of local resolutions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>National / basin Scales </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Analyzing and synthesizing scenarios & methods for out-scaling; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facilitating knowledge sharing across basins and within basins; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developing insights into basin level concerns e.g., Climate change food security, poverty alleviation & biodiversity conservation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RWMS and their widespread dissemination through publications and guides to decision-makers, implementers and the scientific community at large </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Why Platforms? Community participation & commitment Learning through process monitoring & documentation Supportive policies Market orientation Scaling up strategy Community facilitation of R&D process Institutional learning & capacity building Farmer experimention Local organizational capacity Basket of technology options Linkages and partnerships among stakeholders Multi-interdisciplinary & systems approach Managing an Effective RWMS Supportive infrastrcture Commitment & capacity of research teams Supportive research management & organization
  18. 18. <ul><li>Peers and organization take more traditional view of Land and water management – the way of doing it, and research topics. This is related to institutional agenda, donor influence etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Incompatible visions of partners: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>- Those perceiving need for partnerships are not empowered to make them </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>- Limited experience in managing and sustaining partnerships </li></ul></ul><ul><li> - Teamwork not rewarded or supported </li></ul><ul><li>Need a few champions with attitude and new mind set </li></ul><ul><li>Change often driven from the outside and by outsiders – rather than by self-felt need to do things differently </li></ul><ul><li>Limited use of feedback culture and learning from the past; </li></ul><ul><li>M&E systems not designed to foster learning and change </li></ul>Platforms Break Institutional Barriers
  19. 19. Well come to NBDC!