Aortic dissection is a very difficult condition in which the inner sheath of the aortic wall is torn without tearing the outer sheath. This causes blood to enter the aortic wall through the tear, which further splits the mediastinum and creates a new channel in the aortic wall. The serious and often fatal condition of aortic dissection produces symptoms of sudden and tearing chest pain. Although aortic dissection mostly occurs in people around the age of 60, the peak incidence in people with Marfan syndrome is between 20 and 40 years of age.

1. Franjic S*
Independent Researcher, Croatia
*
Corresponding author:
Sinisa Franjic,
Independent Researcher, Croatia
Received: 14 Jan 2024
Accepted: 05 Mar 2024
Published: 12 Mar 2024
J Short Name: COS
Copyright:
©2024 Franjic S, This is an open access article distribut-
ed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
build upon your work non-commercially.
Citation:
Franjic S. Fatal Condition of Aortic Dissection Produces
Symptoms of Sudden and Tearing Chest Pain.
Clin Surg. 2024; 10(9): 1-5
Fatal Condition of Aortic Dissection Produces Symptoms of Sudden and Tearing
Chest Pain
Clinics of Surgery
Research Article ISSN: 2638-1451 Volume 10
United Prime Publications LLC., https://clinicofsurgery.org 1
1. Abstract
Aortic dissection is a very difficult condition in which the inner
sheath of the aortic wall is torn without tearing the outer sheath.
This causes blood to enter the aortic wall through the tear, which
further splits the mediastinum and creates a new channel in the
aortic wall. The serious and often fatal condition of aortic dis-
section produces symptoms of sudden and tearing chest pain. Al-
though aortic dissection mostly occurs in people around the age of
60, the peak incidence in people with Marfan syndrome is between
20 and 40 years of age.
2. Introduction
Dissection of the thoracic aorta is among the foremost feared en-
tities in all of medicine since of the exceedingly high mortality
and the speed with which its wounds become irreversible [1]. An
intimal tear of the aorta permits blood stream to exit the lumen and
travel a variable remove inside the media. Depending on the area
of the intimal tear and the course in which blood travels, aortic dis-
sections can be categorized utilizing two noticeable classification
plans. The DeBakey classification depicts the area and the extent,
while the more simplified Stanford classification looks at the area
alone. A Stanford sort A dissection includes the ascending aorta; a
Stanford type B includes the curve or descending aorta.
Patients with aortic dissections complain of tearing back pain or
crushing chest pain. They are frequently hypertensive and tachy-
cardic. The determination can frequently be confused with acute
myocardial infarction, ureterolithiasis, cholelithiasis, or pancrea-
titis. Patients with malperfusion can display flank or stomach pain
from renal or mesenteric ischemia, lower limit pain or paresthesias
from iliac occlusion, stroke from carotid occlusion, or intense loss
of motion from occlusion of the numerous branches to the spinal
line. These indications of malperfusion can frequently overpower
the chest or back pain from the dissection, clouding the demon-
strative assessment. Delay in diagnosis is exceedingly common in
acute aortic dissection.
3. Acute Aortic Syndrome
The aorta exits the heart at the aortic valve and has both thoracic
and abdominal components [2]. The aortic divider comprises of
three layers. The adventitia is the furthest layer and gives quality
through connective tissue cells, the media contains smooth muscle
cells, and the intima comprises of endothelial cells. The vasa vaso-
rum gives blood supply specifically to the aortic divider through
tunica media and tunica externa cells.
Acute aortic syndromes cover a range of pathology which includes
intramural hematoma (IMH), entering aortic ulcer (PAU), and aor-
tic dissection (AD). All three conditions can display as either acute
or unremitting forms and may influence any portion of the aorta.
The three pathologies are interrelated with comparative character-
istics, but shifting levels of stability.
AD is the foremost common subset of acute aortic disorder and
happen through a tear within the intima into the external third of
the media. The tear comes about in a partition of the layers of the
media, making a true and false lumen. Pulsatile stream can enter
the false lumen which may proliferate the dissection either for-
ward (antegrade) or in reverse (retrograde) from the tear, as well
as re-entry tears which may create somewhere else along the aorta.
Keywords:
Aorta; Dissection; Aoric Dissection;
Emergency; Pain; Health

2. United Prime Publications LLC., https://clinicofsurgery.org 2
Volume 10 Issue 9 -2024 Research Article
IMH and PAU are rarer intense aortic syndromes and as a rule
have absent luminal flow. IMH may emerge from unconstrained
break of aortic vasa vasorum or from a thrombosed aortic untrue
lumen, whereas PAU happens secondary to atherosclerotic plaque
rupture, comparable to a coronary plaque rupture, coming about
in an intimal imperfection and pseudoaneurysm with or without
blood flow in it.
The foundation of the International Registry of Acute Aortic
Dissection (IRAD) database has permitted an universal collec-
tion of centers to collaborate in evaluating the introduction, ad-
ministration, and results of acute AD. The foremost dangerous,
life-threatening acute aortic syndrome is acute type A aortic dis-
section (ATAAD). ATAAD has an frequency of approximately 10
per 10,000 within the United States and a 1-3% mortality rate/h
without surgical repair due to cardiac tamponade, end-organ malp-
erfusion, and aortic crack. Untreated ATAAD is associated with an
over 33% mortality rate within the to begin with 24 h, 50% at 48
h, and 75-90% at 2 weeks. With forceful therapeutic and surgical
treatment, 30-day survival can be as high as 80-90%.
4. Classification
IMH and PAU based on the area of pathology [2]. Whereas numer-
ous classification frameworks exist, the two most common are the
Stanford and DeBakey classifications.
Timing of acute AD is greatly critical since it can alter adminis-
tration methodology. Chronicity is based on the beginning intimal
tear and side effect onset, concurring to agreement North Ameri-
can and European rules for thoracic aortic infection:
• Acute: ≤14 days
• Subacute: 15-90 days
• Chronic: >90 days
5. Pathophisiology
A typical aortic diameter is decided by patient age, size, and sex
[2]. The rising, arch, and descending aorta are regularly 2-3 cm in
distance across. Advertisement happens as a result of expanded
divider stretch based on Laplace’s law, where the pressure (wall
stress) is equal to weight increased by sweep, separated by two
times the wall thickness. Any component that increments divider
push past its capacity will at that point incline that person’s aorta
to dissection.
AD most commonly happens in patients aged 60-70 (mean age 63)
and includes a 3:1 male to female predisposition. The foremost
common hazard figure for AD is incessant hypertension, which
is display in >75% of cases. Connective tissue infections are too
vital chance variables for AD. The three most common are Mar-
fan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz, and Ehlers-Danlos. Connective tissue
disorders weaken the elastin and/or collagen layers of the aortic
wall media, which incline the aorta to aneurysm and dissection.
Extra chance components for AD may be partitioned into coordi-
nate strengths that affect the aortic wall and others that change the
composition of the aortic wall.
Most commonly the intimal tear in ATAAD starts at the correct
front viewpoint of the proximal climbing aorta along the more
noteworthy ebb and flow and may engender through the iliac arter-
ies. Intimal tears starting within the aortic arch or descending tho-
racic supply route may advance retrograde back to the rising aorta,
which speaks to an similarly case not more dangerous illness. Type
B acute ADs most commonly include an intimal tear fair distal to
the cleared-out subclavian or less as often as possible from a tear
within the abdominal aorta with retrograde movement. ADs tend
to happen toward the external layers of the media, making the ex-
ternal wall of the untrue lumen thinner than the intimal fold and
subordinate upon the adventitia for its quality. All vessels emerg-
ing from the aorta counting the coronaries, aortic arch vessels, in-
tercostal supply routes, visceral vessels, and iliac courses may be
sheared off the lumen, impeded by the dissecting media, remain
in communication with the wrong lumen, or stay uninvolved. The
wrong lumen may rupture, re-communicate with the true lumen by
re-entry tears, thrombose, or stay intaglio, driving to future aneu-
rysm arrangement.
6. Emergency
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a medical and often a surgical
emergency [3]. AAD has an surmised rate of 3.5/100,000 people
yearly within the United States. It is five times more common in
guys than females and incorporates a top rate within the fifth and
sixth decades of life. Over 60% of the time, aortic dissections in-
clude the ascending aorta, and the remainder of cases include es-
sentially the descending thoracic and stomach aorta. Even though
treatment has advanced over the past a few decades, various con-
troversies remain. Our most later and total information around
AAD comes from the multicenter International Registry of Acute
Aortic Dissection, which has more than 1,700 patients from 22
institutions.
Even though the common approach has been surgical administra-
tion for AAD of the proximal or climbing aorta and restorative
administration for the slipping aorta, more up-to-date modalities
of treatment have driven to changes in generally treatment. A few
of the basic issues to consider when treating AAD are understand-
ing the classification framework and its pertinence, considering
which AADs ought to be overseen therapeutically or surgically,
what methodology of imaging ought to be utilized, what the part
of blood pressure treatment is in AAD, and the part endovascular
treatment may play within the current time.
7. Pain
The torment of infarction is ordinarily extreme and persistent and
rapidly creates all the hallmarks of peritonitis [3]. The understand-

3. United Prime Publications LLC., https://clinicofsurgery.org 3
Volume 10 Issue 9 -2024 Research Article
ing regularly finds it troublesome to find the location of the tor-
ment, which gets continuously more regrettable in case cleared
out untreated and which is irritated by any development and is
as it were diminished by solid analgesics. Vomiting may go with
the torment and most patients are extremely disgusted. Enormous
vomiting and complete dysphagia happen within the few patients
who create the uncommon condition of localized necrosis of the
stomach caused by a gastric volvulus.
A few patients may depict a classical colic in which the torment
gets to be ceaseless and much more extreme as the blood supply
of a discouraged circle is compromised by the method of stran-
gulation. Patients may know they have a hernia that has ended up
irreducible and excruciating, or they may give a history of past
abdominal surgery, showing the possibility of adhesions as a cause
of strangulation.
A history of angina, heart attacks, strokes or intermittent claudi-
cation demonstrates coexisting atherosclerotic disease and incre-
ments the probability of a mesenteric thrombosis.
Splenic infarction is common in patients with sickle-cell disease,
who may moreover create bowel ischaemia, as may patients with
autoimmune vasculitis.
Severe chest pain going before the abdominal pain demonstrates
the possibility that an aortic dissection has compromised the mes-
enteric vessels and driven to localized necrosis.
When getting an understanding history, the doctor ought to main-
tain a strategic distance from questions that are leading and ought
to center on points of interest of the pain [4]. This incorporates
data on the onset, character, duration, and area of pain as well as
the nearness of radiation of pain.
Concerning onset, pain that creates all of a sudden may be sugges-
tive of a perforated viscus or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Pain that gradually worsens over time may be the result of condi-
tions characterized by the dynamic advancement of infection and
irritation such as intense appendicitis and cholecystitis.
With respect to character, pain described as „burning“ may impli-
cate the pain of a perforated peptic ulcer whereas a „ripping“ or
„tearing“ sensation regularly speaks to the torment of an aortic dis-
memberment. Pain that’s discontinuous or colicky ought to be dis-
tinguished from pain that’s persistent in nature. Colicky torment
is regularly related with obstructive forms of the intestinal, hepa-
tobiliary, or genitourinary tract, whereas pain that’s continuous is
usually the result of underlying ischemia or peritoneal inflamma-
tion. The last mentioned may happen fundamentally or taking after
an introductory scene of colicky pain when an obstructive handle
is complicated by the improvement of ischemia. Illustrations of
this incorporate cases of biliary colic that advances to acute chole-
cystitis or an imprisoned circle of digestive system that gets to be
strangulated and ischemic.
The area of pain is critical to consider as different pathologic con-
ditions tend to happen in particular locales or quadrants of the ab-
domen. In this manner, in the event that the doctor is learned of
the infection forms that cause torment in these ranges, they may
be able to essentially limit their differential. This holds genuine for
those with the understanding that certain conditions may result in
torment that transmits or is alluded to an range past the location of
illness due to shared innervation. Classic cases of this incorporate
biliary torment that’s alluded to the correct subscapular locale, the
pain of acute pancreatitis that emanates to the back, and genitou-
rinary pain that radiates from the flank down to the groin. At last,
it is vital to note any chronological variety within the pain as this
may give accommodating clues to the determination. One of the
leading cases of this is often within the case of intense appendi-
citis, in which pain is at first seen within the periumbilical locale
some time recently localizing to the right lower quadrant (RLQ).
This wonder reflects the move from visceral to parietal torment
as appendiceal inflammation advances to include and irritate the
peritoneal lining.
The larger part of patients showing with intense stomach torment
have partner indications (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, consti-
pation, hematochezia) that are regularly accommodating in mak-
ing a diagnosis. Chronology of nausea is vital to consider as heav-
ing that happens after the onset of abdominal pain is more likely to
be surgical in nature as a result of medullary spewing centers that
are fortified by torment-driving forces traveling through secondary
visceral afferent fibers. Furthermore, constipation or obstipation
may point towards an intestinal obstruction, whereas diarrhea (par-
ticularly if bloody) is related with gastroenteritis, inflammatory
bowel disease, and intestinal ischemia.
8. Disruption
As imaging modalities have duplicated and their determination
made strides, a huge number of aortic pathologies have been re-
vealed and given descriptions [5]. A few of these substances in-
corporate aortic intramural hematoma and entering aortic ulcer,
as well as the catch-all determination of intense aortic disorder.
Particularly characterized, an AAD may be a disturbance of the
layers of the arterial wall of the aorta. It is ordinarily characterized
by a breach of the intimal layer with expansion and disturbance
of the media of the vessel wall. A dismemberment is complex in
that it may frame a winding tear because it expands distally and
proximally. Rarely is the tear or disturbance direct, and it may in-
volve several reentry focuses between genuine and untrue lumens.
In case the adventitial layer is disturbed, at that point the AAD is
basically a rupture and may openly extravasate blood into the chest
or midriff.
By accepted definition, AADs are those that are recognized less
than 14 days from time of the onset of indications. Those that are
analyzed more than 14 days are regularly called subacute in case
recognized earlier to two months from side effects or inveterate in

4. United Prime Publications LLC., https://clinicofsurgery.org 4
Volume 10 Issue 9 -2024 Research Article
the event that more noteworthy than two months from side effect
onset.
The three essential sorts of terminology that exist incorporate the
DeBakey classification, the Stanford classification, and the ana-
tomical classification. The DeBakey framework separates AADs
into three discrete categories based on area of the dismemberment
and area of the intimal tear. DeBakey type I AADs include the
proximal or climbing aorta and the descending aorta. The type II
AAD includes as it were the rising aorta without inclusion of the
curve or bracheocephalic vessels. Sort III beneath the DeBakey
construction portrays AADs that are constrained to the slipping
aorta alone and are further subdivided into IIIa that’s restricted
to the slipping thoracic aorta distal to the subclavian or IIIb, con-
strained to the infra-diaphragmatic aorta.
The other major framework of classification was developed
at Stanford University Medical Center and may be a simplified
grouping of type A involving a dissection within the ascending
aorta and any other portion of the aorta and type B being limited
to a dissection within the aorta distal to the take-off of the cleared
out subclavian. The Stanford type A includes the DeBakey types
I and II, and the type B incorporates DeBakey types IIIa and IIIb.
A framework that may well be more precise and doubtlessly
graphic depends on anatomic specificity. A case would be isolat-
ing AADs into those that include the ascending aorta (that parcel
from the aortic valve to the level of the innominate course), the
transverse or arch aorta (that parcel enveloping the innominate,
cleared out carotid, and cleared out subclavian beginnings) and the
plummeting aorta. The descending aortic dissections seem at that
point be assist isolated into descending thoracic aortic dissections
and thoracoabdominal dissections for those that navigate the dia-
phragm and include the visceral vessels. This framework would
permit clear depiction of both the area of the intimal tear and the
expansion of the dissection.
9. Aneurysms
Thoracic aortic aneurysms are oftentimes noiseless until catastro-
phe strikes, and nearly 95% of patients with thoracic aortic an-
eurysms are undiscovered and completely unconscious of their
condition [6]. The administration of thoracic aortic aneurysms
remains challenging in both the elective and new settings. The
mortality of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms approaches 100%,
and it can be a troublesome choice whether or not to function on a
thoracic aortic dismemberment once it has been found. Clinician
conclusions contrast on when to start forceful surgical methods,
and these choices hold huge results for patients. It is profoundly
likely that detailed frequencies of thoracic aortic aneurysms are
thought little of, as fatal thoracic aortic aneurysm ruptures can be
misdiagnosed as myocardial infarctions. No two thoracic aortic
aneurysms are the same, and it is basic to get it the etiology and
administration of this phenomenon. Generally, the only treatment
alternative for aortic arch illness has been open arch substitution
beneath circulatory capture conditions with or without particular
cerebral perfusion. However, this open method has noteworthy
morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients with numer-
ous comorbidities. To possibly moderate the dangers related with
open aortic arch substitution, endovascular arch repair has picked
up force as an elective treatment choice. As of now, endeavors to
stent the aortic curve are being trialed in various healthcare offices
around the world. Patients chosen for this strategy are considered
a tall chance for customary open curve substitution.
Thoracic aortic aneurysms affect more than 15,000 individuals
within the United States each year, and around 60% of all tho-
racic aortic aneurysms are within the climbing aorta. One of the
foremost causes of death because of thoracic aortic aneurysms
may be a dismemberment, or a tear within the divider of the aor-
ta, as well as add up to crack. Type A aortic dissection (TAAD),
for illustration, is indicated within the Stanford classification as a
dismemberment of the rising aorta, notwithstanding of the distal
extent of the tear, while type B dissection includes the lower aor-
ta. In general, pooled healing center mortality from a later precise
survey and meta-analysis illustrated that hospital mortality for all
surgical repairs of TAAD was 11.9%. Etiologies of TAAD incor-
porate hypertension, atherosclerosis, connective tissue disorders,
injury, disease, and past cardiac or vascular surgery. The acquired
disarranges related with TAAD incorporate aortopathies related
with Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Loeys-Dietz
syndrome, and the bicuspid aortic valve.
10. Diagnosis
Early and exact diagnosis of AAD is critical [5]. A high degree
of clinical doubt combined with cautious indication cross exami-
nation regularly give the diagnosis, which can at that point be af-
firmed with imaging. The foremost common side effect detailed is
pain, regularly portrayed as a shearing, tearing, or ripping in nature
with an area that’s regularly interscapular or paraspinous. Torment
is show within the endless larger part of AADs, with as it were 4%
of patients denying side effects.
Electrocardiogram-gated, multidetector row computed tomogra-
phy (CT) imaging, with and without the utilize of an intravenous
contrast agent, is the mainstay of radiological assessment of the
persistent with asuspected AAD. A CT of the chest, abdomen,
and pelvis can quickly (less than 30 seconds securing time) and
precisely give imaging of the whole aorta from the level of the
aortic valve to the femoral vessels. The essential finding is that of
two lumens or channels with blood, as restricted to one particu-
lar channel, and the visualization of the intimal or average flap.
CT with differentiate will also permit for understanding the area
and extent of the dissection. A non-contrast CT check frequently
provides important data approximately calcification within the di-
viders of the aorta and whether intramural hematoma is displayed

5. United Prime Publications LLC., https://clinicofsurgery.org 5
Volume 10 Issue 9 -2024 Research Article
or thrombosis of the false lumen has happened. Fitting renal de-
fensive techniques ought to be utilized for patients who have sus-
pected or known lessening of their renal function. Hydration and
alkalinization of the patient’s urine are thought to be the foremost
successful techniques to diminish the nephrotoxicity of most intra-
venous iodinated contrast agents.
The precision of multidetector CT with contrast for the discovery
of aortic dissection was 100% in a few considers. In terms of find-
ing the entry tear, CT includes 82% sensitivity and 100% specific-
ity. For characterizing the association of the cephalic or visceral
department vessels, the affectability and specificity are 95% and
100%, individually. A few other ponders report about 100% sensi-
tivity and specificity for CT checking to detect aortic dissections.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an elective methodology
that’s utilized when conventional contrast agents cannot be man-
aged due to renal insufficiency or allergies. Gadolinium, the dif-
ferentiate specialist utilized for most MRIs, has been involved in
a many-fold increment in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and needs
to be avoided in patients with persistent renal lacking. Moreover,
MRI is related to longer picture acquisition times (up to 30 min-
utes) and is regularly not promptly accessible in numerous remote
restorative centers, particularly during off hours. MRI has been
famous for having between 95% and 100% sensitivity and 94%
and 98% specificity for the discovery of aortic dissection.
Invasive imaging, such as contrast aortography, is nearly out of
date for the acute diagnosis of AAD, even though it was the pre-
vious gold standard. Catheterization and angiography is now and
then valuable in agent arranging, such as the imaging of coronary
courses or the appraisal of visceral vessel patency and run-off. In
this respect, intravascular ultrasound has been demonstrated to be
a valuable adjunct for intraoperative imaging and in superior char-
acterizing and recognizing the true and false lumens of vessels.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an important asset
when disparity exists concerning the diagnosis or on the off chance
that clarification is required to get it whether an AAD includes the
ascending aorta. Given that type A dissections require quick sur-
gery, the affirmation of a genuine fold or dissection within the as-
cending aorta by TEE is required if there’s any question or equiv-
ocation on the CT images. Even though its utility is constrained
within the descending thoracic aorta, and despite the methodology
being much more operator-dependent than CT or MRI, TEE can
regularly clearly characterize the beginning of the dissection as ei-
ther distal or proximal to the subclavian artery and authoritatively
reveal whether the ascending aorta is included.
Plain chest X-rays, although suggestive, are not diagnostic and
don’t give the fundamental detail for the diagnosis of either type
A or type B acute aortic dissections. Discoveries on chest X-rays
of an extended mediastinum, tracheal deviation, obscured or al-
tered aortic forms, or the noted displacement of a nasogastric tube
within the thoracic portion should all prompt further, more specific
diagnostic imaging modalities.
11. Conclusion
Aortic dissection occurs most often due to damage to the aortic
wall, and this is the cause of this problem in the majority of cas-
es. Damage to the aortic wall can occur for several reasons, the
most common of which is high blood pressure. Various diagnos-
tic modalities can be used to establish a diagnosis. Primarily, an
X-ray of the chest can be taken, on which the expansion of the
mediastinum will be visible, regardless of the type of dissection
being performed. In order to rule out acute coronary syndrome, it
is necessary to perform an ECG, which normally does not show
any changes, except in cases where the dissection spreads to the
coronary blood vessels. The diagnosis of aortic dissection is most
easily confirmed by transthoracic ultrasound of the heart. CT, as
well as aortography and magnetic resonance are also in use. Each
diagnostic procedure has its advantages and disadvantages, so it
would be ideal to combine them, for example, CT will give ad-
equate data on the location of the entrance and exit rupture, the
length of the dissection, and the involvement of the aortic branch-
es, while on the other hand, echocardiography will provide infor-
mation on valve involvement, that is, about the possible existence
of aortic regurgitation and pericardial rupture.
References
1. Haft JW. The Heart: I. Surgical Treatment of Acquired Cardiac Dis-
ease in Doherty, G. M. (ed): Current Diagnosis and Treatment - Sur-
gery, 14th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USA. 2015;
413-4.
2. Brescia AA, Yang B. Acute Aortic Syndromes“ in Bloom, JP, Sundt
TM. (eds): Cardiac Surgery Clerkship - A Guide for Senior Medi-
cal Students“, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland.
2024; 247-51.
3. Browse NL, Black J, Burnand KG, Thomas WEG. Browse’s Intro-
duction to the Symptoms and Signs of Surgical Disease, Fourth Edi-
tion, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA. 2005;
415.
4. Crandall M. The Evaluation of the Acute Abdomen in Moore, L. J.;
Todd, S. R. (eds): „Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery, Sec-
ond Edition, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzer-
land. 2017; 17-8.
5. Reddy VS. Acute Aortic Dissection in Cohn, S. M. (ed): „Acute Care
Surgery and Trauma - Evidence-Based Practice“, Informa Health-
care, London, UK. 2009; 427-9.
6. Silvay G, Lurie JM. Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Resection“ in Cohen,
E. (ed): „Cohen’s Comprehensive Thoracic Anesthesia“, Elsevier,
Philadelphia, USA. 2022; 559.