This document introduces Fauquier County Public Schools' new teacher evaluation system which will be field tested from September 2011 to May 2012. The new system is in response to state legislative mandates and will evaluate teachers based on 7 standards rather than the previous 5. It aims to give teachers more voice in the process and make evaluations more meaningful. Six schools will participate by having teachers collect evidence of their performance and provide feedback. The goal is to create a practical and respectful system that encourages reflection and favors student learning outcomes over one-time test scores. Teachers and administrators will try out the standards in practice and suggest improvements.
Presentazione di Lee Nothern del HMI Ostfed del governo britannico relativa al suo intervento al convegno internazionale "Migliorare la scuola" (14-15 Maggio 2015, Napoli), organizzato dall'Indire.
A detailed description on school based assessment, Bangladesh view.
Reference: National Curriculam and Textbook Board. (2006). Teacher’s guide for SBA.
Presentazione di Lee Nothern del HMI Ostfed del governo britannico relativa al suo intervento al convegno internazionale "Migliorare la scuola" (14-15 Maggio 2015, Napoli), organizzato dall'Indire.
A detailed description on school based assessment, Bangladesh view.
Reference: National Curriculam and Textbook Board. (2006). Teacher’s guide for SBA.
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Discussion ab out trends in assessment and accountability for National Superintendent's Dialogue
CXC presented at the 2015 UWI Symposium on the topic " Transforming Assessment and Evaluation: Potential Impact of New School-Based Assessment Guidelines"
Presented at the 2013 NPEA conference by: Brigham Nahas Research Associates, The Steppingstone Foundation, Kingsbury Center at NWEA
http://www.educational-access.org/npea_conference_speakers2013.php
This presentation clarifies what formative assessment is. The purpose and intention of formative assessment on improving student learning is emphasized. The different techniques on conducting formative assessment inside the classroom are provided.
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Discussion ab out trends in assessment and accountability for National Superintendent's Dialogue
CXC presented at the 2015 UWI Symposium on the topic " Transforming Assessment and Evaluation: Potential Impact of New School-Based Assessment Guidelines"
Presented at the 2013 NPEA conference by: Brigham Nahas Research Associates, The Steppingstone Foundation, Kingsbury Center at NWEA
http://www.educational-access.org/npea_conference_speakers2013.php
This presentation clarifies what formative assessment is. The purpose and intention of formative assessment on improving student learning is emphasized. The different techniques on conducting formative assessment inside the classroom are provided.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere, promising self-driving cars, medical breakthroughs, and new ways of working. But how do you separate hype from reality? How can your company apply AI to solve real business problems?
Here’s what AI learnings your business should keep in mind for 2017.
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsLinkedIn
We asked LinkedIn members worldwide about their levels of interest in the latest wave of technology: whether they’re using wearables, and whether they intend to buy self-driving cars and VR headsets as they become available. We asked them too about their attitudes to technology and to the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the devices that they use. The answers were fascinating – and in many cases, surprising.
This SlideShare explores the full results of this study, including detailed market-by-market breakdowns of intention levels for each technology – and how attitudes change with age, location and seniority level. If you’re marketing a tech brand – or planning to use VR and wearables to reach a professional audience – then these are insights you won’t want to miss.
The Regents Reform Agenda & Improvement of Teaching PracticesCASDANY
A review or the Regents Reform Agenda in NYS, and how teacher improvement can affect student performance. A look into the standards and assessment, data systems to support instruction, great teachers and leaders, and turning around struggling schools as part of the Regents Reform Agenda.
The following presentation juxtaposes the research and practices found in the areas of problem and project based learning, organizational leadership and change, and Visible Learning to enhance leaders at all levels to substantially enhance the learning of students.
Learning-oriented assessment in an era of high-stakes and insecure testingMark Carver
Presentation at the EUKS conference in Edinburgh, February 23rd 2019. An introduction to how assessment issues in HE may be relevant to language teachers in the future.
Learn how to bring the three big ideas of a PLC to life in a middle school. Leave with a powerful understanding of what it takes to transform any middle school into a high-performing PLC. Gain practical strategies you can use immediately.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Faculty 2 copy - developing a new teacher eval process
1. Developing a New Teacher
Evaluation System:
Faculty Meetings 2011
2. Developing a New Teacher*
Evaluation System:
AGENDA GOALS:
1. To introduce the new state standards for
teaching performance: why? what?
2. To review Fauquier County’s response to the
state requirements and its implementation
process.
*Counselor, Librarian, Specialists, &
Administrators will follow this process.
3. Why New Standards Now?
• STATE: State’s response to legislative mandate
and state revision of 2000 standards:
The new guidelines and standards will become effective on July 1, 2012…
The Code of Virginia requires (1) that teacher evaluations be consistent
with the performance objectives (standards) included in the Board of
Education’s Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation
Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) that
school boards shall develop procedures in evaluating instructional
personnel that address student academic progress….
• FAUQUIER COUNTY: It’s time. Current FCPS
evaluation program was developed in 1999 and
passed by the school board in 2001.
4. WHY TEACHERS?
Teachers matter most.
• “Teacher effectiveness is THE most significant
school-related variable impacting student learning
outcomes” (Hattie, 2009).
• Studies have found that as much as a 30 percentile
point difference in student achievement in math
and English can be attributed to the quality of
teaching over an academic year.
5. The Studies
Student Achievement Accounted for by Teacher Effects
Approximate Variability in Student
Study Achievement Explained by Teacher
Effectiveness
Goldhaber (2002) 8.5 percent
Heistad (1999) 9.2 percent
Nye, Konstantopoulos, &
7-21 percent
Hedges (2004)
Rivkin, Hanushek, & Kain
15 percent
(2005)
Munoz & Chang (2007) 14 percent
6. Teachers Make A Difference
Catherine Snow (1991). Unfulfilled Expectations. Harvard University Press
PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN WHO ACHIEVE SUCCESS
WITH VARYING LEVELS OF
HOME AND CLASSROOM SUPPORT
HIGH HOME LOW HOME SUPPORT
SUPPORT
HIGH CLASSROOM 100% 100%
SUPPORT
MIXED CLASSROOM 100% 25%
SUPPORT
LOW CLASSROOM 60% 0%
SUPPORT
7. Comparative Impact of Effective Versus
Ineffective Primary Grade Teachers
Comparative Impact of Effective Versus Ineffective
Primary Grade Teachers
Comparative Impact on Student
Teacher Effectiveness Level
Achievement
Reading: 25th vs. 75th percentile teacher +0.35 Standard Deviation
Math: 25th vs. 75th percentile teacher +0.48 Standard Deviation
Reading: 50th vs. 90th percentile teacher +0.33 Standard Deviation
Math: 50th vs. 90th percentile teacher +0.46 Standard Deviation
Note: To illustrate the conversion of a standard deviation into percentiles, if a student started at the 50th
percentile on a pre-test and her performance increased by 0.50 standard deviation on the post-test, the
student would have a score at approximately the 67th percentile -- a gain of 17 percentile points.
Stronge, J. H. (2010a), p. 19.
8. What will change?
BOTTOM LINE.
CURRENT STANDARDS – FIVE (5)
(1) classroom environment; (2) planning & assessing instruction; (3)
implementing instruction; (4) communication; (5) professionalism
NEW STANDARDS – SEVEN (7)
(1) professional knowledge (2) instructional planning (3)
instructional delivery (4) assessment of and for student learning (5)
learning environment (6) professionalism (7) student academic
progress
9. Another Change: Rating Scale
• CURRENT “SCALE” FOR FINAL EVALUATION
– Meets Expectations
– Needs Improvement
• NEW SCALE FOR FINAL EVALUATION
– Rating scale of four (4) levels (state guidelines)
– Example in guidelines:
• (4) Exemplary (3) Proficient
• (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unacceptable
10. A CLOSER LOOK AT
THE 7 STANDARDS
(1) professional knowledge
(2) instructional planning
(3) instructional delivery
(4) assessment of and for student learning
(5) learning environment
(6) professionalism
(7) student academic progress
11. BIG QUESTIONS
Questions that have emerged in the research and in
discussions with teachers and administrators
• Even with these bottom line changes, will (should) the
evaluation process be “business-as-usual”?
• If not, how might we improve our process?
• Is it possible to make the evaluation process more
meaningful for teachers? Will the teacher be able to
contribute to the development of his/her own
evaluation? (TEACHER VOICE)
ability to make choices about focus for
evaluation; ability to provide evidence; ability to
provide “context” about classes.
12. BIG QUESTIONS (CONT’D)
• Will a new process address some of the standard
problems with teacher evaluation (e.g., THE “ONE
SNAPSHOT” PHENOMENON)?
• What does the standard “student academic progress”
mean to the teacher and daily practice?
• Is it possible to make the evaluation process more
meaningful and less cumbersome (for principals)?
• How do we give this opportunity our best shot?
– Why not “try-on” the new standards before they are
required?
– Why not try-out several implementation approaches in a
real-time context?
14. Our Field Test Guiding Principles
• Participatory
– Include teachers in the process; provide opportunities
for many voices
• Purposeful
– Look at evaluation approaches that have meaning for
real classroom experiences…that acknowledge value
of assessment but go beyond one-time test
scores…that keep student learning in focus
• Patient
– Make this a true search; ask questions; take risks,
make corrections; allow for errors and revisions
15. Field Test Participants
• Six Schools: Smith, Mary Walter,
Coleman, Auburn, Cedar Lee, and
Kettle Run
• 3-5 teachers from each of these
schools
16. Field Test Participants:
Excellent Teachers and Cross-Section of FCPS Teaching Staff
• Kindergarten • English
• 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th • Mathematics
• Special Education • Advanced Placement
• 6th, 7th, 8th • Fine Arts
• Science • Physical Education
• CTE (Tech. Education) • Reading
• History and Social
Science
17. The teachers….
• Meet to set/clarify goals based on 7 standards.
• Teach as always.
• Collect evidence to support each standard (some
standards may have more emphasis than others)
• Receive new summative evaluation based on 7
standards.
• Share experiences; suggest changes and additions
to the process (ease of use? practicality? vocabulary?
respectful?)
18. How do teachers “collect evidence”?
• The Evidence Log
• Teachers will include lists of activities,
artifacts, charts, admin. feedback, tests that
demonstrate meeting the standard
Instructional Planning a unit plan
Instructional Delivery student survey(s)
Student Academic Progress pre & post test of a unit
19. The principals….
• Meet to set/clarify goals based on 7 standards.
• Supervise instruction as always.
• Provide teacher observation feedback to support
one or more standard
• Conduct summative evaluation based on 7
standards.
• Share experiences; suggest changes and additions
to the process (ease of use? practicality? vocabulary?
respectful?)
20. What we want to accomplish
through the field-testing
• To make our evaluation process better
• To see if we can find a feasible way to give teachers
more voice in their own evaluation
• To see if we can reduce the “one snapshot” effect
• To see if we can create a process that will favorably
impact student learning
• To see if we can create a process that encourages
teacher & administrative reflection
• To “try-on” the standards with practicing teachers &
administrators –in a real context
• To “try-out” a process – in a real context
21. How Can You Participate?
• Review standards and definitions with your
colleagues
• Ask how might you demonstrate the meeting
of the standards ---- your choice.
• Share your ideas or questions through
survey. (Sent to you next week.)
22. QUESTIONS?
“Teachers matter most. The quality of an education
system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers.”
(Barber and Mourshed, 2007, p. iii in Stronge (2011), Why Teachers
Matter Most.)