Ex. 110
•
1 like•163 views
This letter from the tribunal requests additional information from both parties regarding Ecuador's application to dissolve three interim arbitration awards in the dispute between Chevron and Ecuador. Specifically, the tribunal asks Chevron to provide more details on enforcement proceedings outside of Canada, Brazil and Argentina. It also asks Ecuador to comment on Chevron's description of the progress of enforcement proceedings in those three countries. Finally, both parties are requested to address a recent decision by The Hague Court of Appeal relevant to Ecuador's application and provide copies of that decision in Dutch and English if possible.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
062018 FAX -EMAIL Prosecutor Eric Hawkins... (Cary Johnson)
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document contains the FAX sent in regards to the Cary Cornelius Johnson matter. Mr. Johnson was KIDNAPPED and subjected to other CRIMES on or about 04/30/18.
Many mentioned that under the United States’ DESPOTISM President Donald Trump, he would DIVIDE the Country. However, even better, a Legal and Lawful “NEW” Government (Utica International Embassy) will be addressing and bringing matters properly before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals and/or Nations to address such TERRORIST/RACIST attacks, etc. as that leveled against SOVEREIGN Citizens as Cary Cornelius Johnson WITHOUT just cause!
NOTE: How QUICK the KKKlan’s Law Enforcement was to KIDNAP and commit other CRIMES against Cary Cornelius Johnson. NOW that he is ENTITLED to RESTITUTION, they will DRAG THEIR FEET!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/061818-fax-to-mississippicommissiononjudicialperformancejudgemichaelprewittprosecutorerichawkins-cary-johnson
With Warmest Regards,
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(888) 700-5056 / (513) 680-2922
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
28 usc453
Each justice and judge of the United States must take an oath to administer justice without respect to persons, do equal right to both the poor and rich, and faithfully and impartially perform all duties under the US Constitution and laws. The oath states "I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [position] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
Sample cease and desist letter to collection agency
This sample cease and desist letter to a collection agency for California is sent pursuant to the Federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 1692c and 1692k, and by the Rosenthal Collection Practices Act, California Civil Code Section 1788.17. The sample requests that the collection agency immediately cease and desist all telephone calls to either the place of employment or the home of the alleged debtor and further states that any violations may result in legal action. The sample can be modified for use in any State in the United States of America. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 250 sample legal documents for sale.
Ca2 db241675 01
This document is a response opposing an application for an extension of time to file a brief. It summarizes that the appellants, who are appealing an order adding them as judgment debtors, have already received 60 days of extensions for filing their brief, totaling 120 days. The response argues the appeal does not require unusually complex factual or legal analysis. It asserts the appellants' claims that the appeal involves issues of probate, taxation, and irrevocable trusts are not properly within the scope of the appeal. The response requests the court deny any further extensions.
Master exhibit
This document summarizes testimony from Stephen Gaggero during a trial. Gaggero testified that he currently resides on a 1,500 acre ranch in Ventura County that he uses for equestrian activities, cattle grazing, and growing crops. He has lived in California his entire life. After leaving high school halfway through 10th grade, he became a licensed general contractor and built homes for others until 1985 when he began developing his own real estate projects, primarily custom single-family homes along the California coast from Malibu south. He also remodeled apartment buildings and small shopping centers that he kept in his real estate portfolio.
Sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California
This sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California includes a cause of action under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act found in Civil Code section 3439 et seq., and also includes causes of action for common law fraudulent transfer as well as violations of the California bulk sale law. The sample document on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions and a verification. The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and also collected unpaid California judgments for over 20 years and has used this sample for many years.
Document 112 (Main)
This document is a motion filed by the plaintiffs' attorneys requesting permission from the court to file a fourth amended complaint. Specifically, the motion requests: (1) changing the class definition; (2) removing Michele Reinhart as a plaintiff and adding George and Susie Pfau; and (3) adding claims against additional defendants including Central Asia Institute and MC Consulting for alleged RICO violations. The motion also details why the plaintiffs' counsel believes the additional claims and parties are necessary.
DMD reed smith bio september 2016
This document provides biographical information about Donna Doblick, including her education, areas of legal practice, experience, honors and awards. Some key details:
- She is an appellate attorney and counsel at Reed Smith LLP based in Pittsburgh.
- Her appellate practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and questions of foreign law. She has over 20 years of litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels.
- She received her law degree from the University of Chicago Law School and clerked for Judge Frank H. Easterbrook of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Her notable cases include successfully defending antitrust, business tort, and fraud claims on behalf of
Recommended
062018 FAX -EMAIL Prosecutor Eric Hawkins... (Cary Johnson)
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document contains the FAX sent in regards to the Cary Cornelius Johnson matter. Mr. Johnson was KIDNAPPED and subjected to other CRIMES on or about 04/30/18.
Many mentioned that under the United States’ DESPOTISM President Donald Trump, he would DIVIDE the Country. However, even better, a Legal and Lawful “NEW” Government (Utica International Embassy) will be addressing and bringing matters properly before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals and/or Nations to address such TERRORIST/RACIST attacks, etc. as that leveled against SOVEREIGN Citizens as Cary Cornelius Johnson WITHOUT just cause!
NOTE: How QUICK the KKKlan’s Law Enforcement was to KIDNAP and commit other CRIMES against Cary Cornelius Johnson. NOW that he is ENTITLED to RESTITUTION, they will DRAG THEIR FEET!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/061818-fax-to-mississippicommissiononjudicialperformancejudgemichaelprewittprosecutorerichawkins-cary-johnson
With Warmest Regards,
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(888) 700-5056 / (513) 680-2922
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
28 usc453
Each justice and judge of the United States must take an oath to administer justice without respect to persons, do equal right to both the poor and rich, and faithfully and impartially perform all duties under the US Constitution and laws. The oath states "I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [position] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God."
Sample cease and desist letter to collection agency
This sample cease and desist letter to a collection agency for California is sent pursuant to the Federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 1692c and 1692k, and by the Rosenthal Collection Practices Act, California Civil Code Section 1788.17. The sample requests that the collection agency immediately cease and desist all telephone calls to either the place of employment or the home of the alleged debtor and further states that any violations may result in legal action. The sample can be modified for use in any State in the United States of America. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 250 sample legal documents for sale.
Ca2 db241675 01
This document is a response opposing an application for an extension of time to file a brief. It summarizes that the appellants, who are appealing an order adding them as judgment debtors, have already received 60 days of extensions for filing their brief, totaling 120 days. The response argues the appeal does not require unusually complex factual or legal analysis. It asserts the appellants' claims that the appeal involves issues of probate, taxation, and irrevocable trusts are not properly within the scope of the appeal. The response requests the court deny any further extensions.
Master exhibit
This document summarizes testimony from Stephen Gaggero during a trial. Gaggero testified that he currently resides on a 1,500 acre ranch in Ventura County that he uses for equestrian activities, cattle grazing, and growing crops. He has lived in California his entire life. After leaving high school halfway through 10th grade, he became a licensed general contractor and built homes for others until 1985 when he began developing his own real estate projects, primarily custom single-family homes along the California coast from Malibu south. He also remodeled apartment buildings and small shopping centers that he kept in his real estate portfolio.
Sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California
This sample complaint for fraudulent transfer in California includes a cause of action under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act found in Civil Code section 3439 et seq., and also includes causes of action for common law fraudulent transfer as well as violations of the California bulk sale law. The sample document on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions and a verification. The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and also collected unpaid California judgments for over 20 years and has used this sample for many years.
Document 112 (Main)
This document is a motion filed by the plaintiffs' attorneys requesting permission from the court to file a fourth amended complaint. Specifically, the motion requests: (1) changing the class definition; (2) removing Michele Reinhart as a plaintiff and adding George and Susie Pfau; and (3) adding claims against additional defendants including Central Asia Institute and MC Consulting for alleged RICO violations. The motion also details why the plaintiffs' counsel believes the additional claims and parties are necessary.
DMD reed smith bio september 2016
This document provides biographical information about Donna Doblick, including her education, areas of legal practice, experience, honors and awards. Some key details:
- She is an appellate attorney and counsel at Reed Smith LLP based in Pittsburgh.
- Her appellate practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and questions of foreign law. She has over 20 years of litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels.
- She received her law degree from the University of Chicago Law School and clerked for Judge Frank H. Easterbrook of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Her notable cases include successfully defending antitrust, business tort, and fraud claims on behalf of
SC-500I katryna child rhodes.pdf
1. A summons and complaint form is presented for a small claims case in an unspecified Wisconsin county court.
2. The plaintiff, Sima Albouyeh of Las Vegas, NV, is suing the defendant, Katryna Child-Rhodes of Wauwatosa, WI, for $10,000.
3. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant represented themselves as a court official in a fake Zoom hearing for a nonexistent debt collection case against the plaintiff, as part of an ongoing conspiracy against the plaintiff.
NC 100
This document is a petition for a change of name filed in a California superior court. It requests that the court change the names listed in item 2 to the proposed names. It also requests that the court issue an order directing interested parties to appear and show cause why the name changes should not be granted. Additional information about each person whose name is to be changed must be attached using form NC-110.
The petition provides basic information about the petitioner and the name changes being requested. It confirms the number of people under 18 whose names are being changed and identifies the relationship of the petitioner to those individuals (e.g. parent or guardian).
Fc2006removal sawbsp
This document summarizes a memorandum of fact and law supporting the removal of a case from a Minnesota state court to federal court. The appellant claims they have been subject to long-term harassment and defamation by the city of St. Paul due to past political activities and litigation. The current case involves a threat by the city water board to disconnect water service, and the appellant argues the board has not provided adequate reasons and is denying them due process. The appellant requests the federal court issue an injunction barring further state court proceedings and police searches to prevent irreparable harm.
Ttabvue 91232672-opp-4
Tesla Motors, Inc. withdrew two pending trademark applications (numbers 86960133 and 86960138) for the stylized "3" and "Model 3" marks. The withdrawal was filed with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on February 6, 2017 by Tesla's attorneys, Cooley LLP, in response to an opposition filed by adidas AG. Cooley certified that they electronically filed the withdrawal and also mailed and emailed a copy of the withdrawal to adidas AG's attorney.
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document has been prepared in support of DEPRIVATION OF JURY TRIAL(S) - i.e. as “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury” – as set forth in the United States of America’s DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Furthermore, provides a copy of a Court Order FALSELY accusing Newsome of RACIAL and ANTI-SEMITIC SLURS for addressing for what are KNOWN to be Terrorist Acts, War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, and other Criminal Acts launched against her by the United States of America’s NAZI’S and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Are those WHO played ROLES in the FOUNDING of Israel as the Nazis and/or WHITE Jewish/Zionists/Supremacists Law Firms as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-founder-of-state-of-israel
The DENIAL of JURY TRIAL is also a defense that may be used in seeking INTERNATIONAL Judicial Review, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS, etc. – i.e. in taking matter(s) before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals!
177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez
This document summarizes a court case involving a complaint for disbarment filed against Atty. Fred L. Gutierrez. Gisela Huyssen alleges that Gutierrez misappropriated $20,000 she deposited with him while he worked for the Bureau of Immigration, falsely claiming the money was required for her family's visa applications. While Gutierrez admitted receiving the money, he denied misappropriating it. However, he failed to provide evidence and did not appear at several hearings, resulting in a recommendation that he be disbarred for violating legal ethics.
17 1302 documents
This document provides a notice of docketing for an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal is case number 17-1302, involving CardiAQ Valve Technologies v. Neovasc Inc. The notice lists critical dates for the appeal, including dates for entry of appearance, certificate of interest, docketing statement, requests for extensions of time, briefs, and scheduling conflicts for oral argument. It also provides contact information for the parties and clerks.
Darren Chaker publish_police_address
Darren Chaker http://darrenchaker,us/ notes, “[T]he First Amendment does not „belong‟ to any definable category of persons or entities: It belongs to all who exercise its freedoms.” First Nat. Bank. of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 802 (1978) (Burger, C.J., concurring). This federal court ruling found a Florida law preventing disclosure of police home address information to be unconstitutional for several articulated reasons based on the First Amendment. The court found the right to publish police home addresses did not fall within any category of speech the First Amendment allowed to exempt from protection.
Brayshaw v. City Of Tallahassee, 2010 - Landmark Case Striking Down The 1972...
The Landmark Case Of Brayshaw V. City Of Tallahassee, 2010. This federal case made Rob Brayshaw an American Civil Rights Hero Against Dumb and Dirty Cops Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore who were very crooked and dishonest. The Florida Statute from 1972 known as "The Dildo Law" or "Dilmore's Law" was struck down as Unconstitutional on it's face and illegally applied by false police reports as there was no threat. Tallahassee cops attempted to illegally silence and use illegal censorships for exposing them as crooked police officers.
Brayshaw order
The Landmark Federal Case Of Brayshaw V. City Of Tallahassee, 2010. This is the federal court order protecting the First Amendment Rights Of Our U.S. Constitution Against Dumb and Dirty Police Officers, Malicious Prosecutors and Corrupt Judges. The 1972 Florida Statute Was Struck Down as Unconstitutional on its face and as illegally applied by dirty cops of Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore with their falsely written police reports.
USA v. Matt Beasley Extension
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Robert Brayshaw filed an amended complaint against Annette Garrett alleging violations of his civil rights and First Amendment rights. Brayshaw claims Garrett deleted his critical online posts about the Tallahassee Police Department and Garrett. Garrett used her position as a police officer to have Brayshaw's accounts terminated on various websites. Brayshaw argues these were retaliatory acts that violated his free speech rights. He is seeking damages and claims Garrett's actions were willful, wanton, and in reckless disregard of his rights.
Motion to Disqualify
This document is a motion by the United States to disqualify defense attorneys Myles Breiner and Kevin Sumida from representing defendants Katherine and Louis Kealoha. The motion argues Breiner and Sumida have conflicts of interest that prevent them from providing competent representation due to their simultaneous representation of both Kealohas and other past representations. Specifically, Breiner previously represented plaintiffs suing Louis Kealoha for civil rights violations and a defendant prosecuted by Katherine Kealoha. Sumida may be a witness in the current case. The motion asks the court to disqualify both attorneys to avoid ethical issues and ensure the trial proceeds fairly.
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of Eligio Cedeño v. Castillo. The order affirms the district court's dismissal of Cedeño's RICO complaint against various defendants for failure to state a claim. Specifically, it finds that Cedeño's complaint alleges an extraterritorial violation of RICO that the statute does not reach based on insufficient domestic conduct. It also rejects Cedeño's arguments that his claims fit within RICO's domestic focus and that RICO incorporates extraterritorial predicate offenses. The court further finds that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cedeño's request to amend his complaint.
benchmemo_evenwelvabbott
This case concerns a challenge to Texas's congressional redistricting plan, which is based on total population from census data rather than eligible voter population. The plaintiffs argue this dilutes some voters' influence. The Fifth Circuit dismissed the case, finding no substantial evidence of an equal protection violation. The respondents argue precedent requires using total population and the plan's population deviations are acceptable. The Supreme Court must consider whether to require apportionment based on eligible voter population instead of total population from the census.
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
This document summarizes a ruling by the Supreme Court of California regarding challenges to Proposition 8, a ballot initiative that amended the state constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. The court found that Proposition 8 constituted a valid constitutional amendment, rather than a revision, and was therefore properly enacted through the ballot initiative process. It determined that Proposition 8 had a narrow effect of reserving the designation of marriage for opposite-sex couples while leaving other rights of same-sex couples intact.
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
This document summarizes a court case from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia regarding claims brought by the Herero People's Reparations Corporation against Deutsche Bank AG. The plaintiffs allege that during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Deutsche Bank engaged in genocide, extermination, enslavement, and other atrocities against the Herero Tribe of Namibia in cooperation with the German government. Deutsche Bank filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the court lacks jurisdiction and the plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim. The court must determine if it has authority to consider the case on its merits before ruling on the motion to dismiss.
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive De...
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive Department's Engagement In Criminal Acts - Obama Administration Of Justice (President Barack Obama, United States Attorney Eric Holder, and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis)
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
3/6/2017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2005 - Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13096571268307866226&q=Castle+Rock+v.+Gonzales,+545+US+748+(2005)&hl=en&as_sdt=1006 1/17
545 U.S. 748 (2005)
TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO
v.
GONZALES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT BEST FRIEND OF HER DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN,
GONZALES ET AL.
No. 04-278.
Argued March 21, 2005.
Decided June 27, 2005.
Supreme Court of United States.
*750 John C. Eastman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Thomas S. Rice, Eric M. Ziporin, and Erik S.
Jaffe.
750
John P. Elwood argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Acting
Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Michael Jay Singer, and Howard S. Scher.
Brian J. Reichel argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.
We decide in this case whether an individual who has obtained a state-law restraining order has a constitutionally *751 protected
property interest in having the police enforce the restraining order when they have probable cause to believe it has been
violated.
751
I
The horrible facts of this case are contained in the complaint that respondent Jessica Gonzales filed in Federal District Court.
(Because the case comes to us on appeal from a dismissal of the complaint, we assume its allegations are true. See
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U. S. 506, 508, n. 1 (2002).) Respondent alleges that petitioner, the town of Castle Rock,
Colorado, violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution when its police
officers, acting pursuant to official policy or custom, failed to respond properly to her repeated reports that her estranged husband
was violating the terms of a restraining order.[1]
The restraining order had been issued by a state trial court several weeks earlier in conjunction with respondent's divorce
proceedings. The original form order, issued on May 21, 1999, and served on respondent's husband on June 4, 1999,
commanded him not to "molest or disturb the peace of [respondent] or of any child," and to remain at least 100 yards from the
family home at all times. 366 F. 3d 1093, 1143 (CA10 2004) (en banc) (appendix to dissenting opinion of O'Brien, J.). The bottom
of the preprinted form noted that the reverse side contained "IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR RESTRAINED PARTIES AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS." Ibid. (emphasis deleted). The preprinted *752 text on the back of the form included the following
"WARNING":
752
"A KNOWING VIOLATION OF A RESTRAINING ORDER IS A CRIME . . . . A VIOLATION WILL ALSO CONSTITUTE
CONTEMPT OF COURT. YOU MAY BE ARRESTED WITHOUT NOTICE IF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER HAS
PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE KNOWINGLY VIOLATED THIS ORDER." Id., at 1144
(emphasis in original).
The preprinted text on the back of th ...
Dallas appellate lawyer Chad Ruback shares tips with trial attorneys
There is no document text provided to summarize. A document with content is required to generate a meaningful summary.
Ex. 134
- The document is a letter from the Ecuadorian Attorney General's office responding to an order to attach $96 million that the Ecuadorian government allegedly owes to Chevron.
- The order was issued in relation to an arbitration award against Ecuador in favor of Chevron, but Ecuador is appealing the award. As such, there is no definitive debt owed to Chevron at this time.
- The Attorney General argues that the funds ordered for attachment are protected and not subject to attachment under Ecuadorian law. He asks that the order be revoked.
Ex. 133
This document is an award from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal regarding claims brought by SEDCO, Inc. against the National Iranian Oil Company and Iran. SEDCO leased drilling rigs to NIOC through its subsidiary SISA. SEDCO alleges that after contract termination in 1979, NIOC appropriated the rigs by failing to assist with export as required and continuing to operate the rigs in Iran. NIOC argues it did not take possession of the rigs until 1980 and was only obligated to use best efforts to help with export. The tribunal must determine whether NIOC's actions around contract termination and after amounted to a taking of the rigs for which compensation is due.
More Related Content
Similar to Ex. 110
SC-500I katryna child rhodes.pdf
1. A summons and complaint form is presented for a small claims case in an unspecified Wisconsin county court.
2. The plaintiff, Sima Albouyeh of Las Vegas, NV, is suing the defendant, Katryna Child-Rhodes of Wauwatosa, WI, for $10,000.
3. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant represented themselves as a court official in a fake Zoom hearing for a nonexistent debt collection case against the plaintiff, as part of an ongoing conspiracy against the plaintiff.
NC 100
This document is a petition for a change of name filed in a California superior court. It requests that the court change the names listed in item 2 to the proposed names. It also requests that the court issue an order directing interested parties to appear and show cause why the name changes should not be granted. Additional information about each person whose name is to be changed must be attached using form NC-110.
The petition provides basic information about the petitioner and the name changes being requested. It confirms the number of people under 18 whose names are being changed and identifies the relationship of the petitioner to those individuals (e.g. parent or guardian).
Fc2006removal sawbsp
This document summarizes a memorandum of fact and law supporting the removal of a case from a Minnesota state court to federal court. The appellant claims they have been subject to long-term harassment and defamation by the city of St. Paul due to past political activities and litigation. The current case involves a threat by the city water board to disconnect water service, and the appellant argues the board has not provided adequate reasons and is denying them due process. The appellant requests the federal court issue an injunction barring further state court proceedings and police searches to prevent irreparable harm.
Ttabvue 91232672-opp-4
Tesla Motors, Inc. withdrew two pending trademark applications (numbers 86960133 and 86960138) for the stylized "3" and "Model 3" marks. The withdrawal was filed with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on February 6, 2017 by Tesla's attorneys, Cooley LLP, in response to an opposition filed by adidas AG. Cooley certified that they electronically filed the withdrawal and also mailed and emailed a copy of the withdrawal to adidas AG's attorney.
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document has been prepared in support of DEPRIVATION OF JURY TRIAL(S) - i.e. as “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury” – as set forth in the United States of America’s DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Furthermore, provides a copy of a Court Order FALSELY accusing Newsome of RACIAL and ANTI-SEMITIC SLURS for addressing for what are KNOWN to be Terrorist Acts, War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, and other Criminal Acts launched against her by the United States of America’s NAZI’S and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Are those WHO played ROLES in the FOUNDING of Israel as the Nazis and/or WHITE Jewish/Zionists/Supremacists Law Firms as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-founder-of-state-of-israel
The DENIAL of JURY TRIAL is also a defense that may be used in seeking INTERNATIONAL Judicial Review, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS, etc. – i.e. in taking matter(s) before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals!
177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez
This document summarizes a court case involving a complaint for disbarment filed against Atty. Fred L. Gutierrez. Gisela Huyssen alleges that Gutierrez misappropriated $20,000 she deposited with him while he worked for the Bureau of Immigration, falsely claiming the money was required for her family's visa applications. While Gutierrez admitted receiving the money, he denied misappropriating it. However, he failed to provide evidence and did not appear at several hearings, resulting in a recommendation that he be disbarred for violating legal ethics.
17 1302 documents
This document provides a notice of docketing for an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal is case number 17-1302, involving CardiAQ Valve Technologies v. Neovasc Inc. The notice lists critical dates for the appeal, including dates for entry of appearance, certificate of interest, docketing statement, requests for extensions of time, briefs, and scheduling conflicts for oral argument. It also provides contact information for the parties and clerks.
Darren Chaker publish_police_address
Darren Chaker http://darrenchaker,us/ notes, “[T]he First Amendment does not „belong‟ to any definable category of persons or entities: It belongs to all who exercise its freedoms.” First Nat. Bank. of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 802 (1978) (Burger, C.J., concurring). This federal court ruling found a Florida law preventing disclosure of police home address information to be unconstitutional for several articulated reasons based on the First Amendment. The court found the right to publish police home addresses did not fall within any category of speech the First Amendment allowed to exempt from protection.
Brayshaw v. City Of Tallahassee, 2010 - Landmark Case Striking Down The 1972...
The Landmark Case Of Brayshaw V. City Of Tallahassee, 2010. This federal case made Rob Brayshaw an American Civil Rights Hero Against Dumb and Dirty Cops Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore who were very crooked and dishonest. The Florida Statute from 1972 known as "The Dildo Law" or "Dilmore's Law" was struck down as Unconstitutional on it's face and illegally applied by false police reports as there was no threat. Tallahassee cops attempted to illegally silence and use illegal censorships for exposing them as crooked police officers.
Brayshaw order
The Landmark Federal Case Of Brayshaw V. City Of Tallahassee, 2010. This is the federal court order protecting the First Amendment Rights Of Our U.S. Constitution Against Dumb and Dirty Police Officers, Malicious Prosecutors and Corrupt Judges. The 1972 Florida Statute Was Struck Down as Unconstitutional on its face and as illegally applied by dirty cops of Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore with their falsely written police reports.
USA v. Matt Beasley Extension
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Robert Brayshaw filed an amended complaint against Annette Garrett alleging violations of his civil rights and First Amendment rights. Brayshaw claims Garrett deleted his critical online posts about the Tallahassee Police Department and Garrett. Garrett used her position as a police officer to have Brayshaw's accounts terminated on various websites. Brayshaw argues these were retaliatory acts that violated his free speech rights. He is seeking damages and claims Garrett's actions were willful, wanton, and in reckless disregard of his rights.
Motion to Disqualify
This document is a motion by the United States to disqualify defense attorneys Myles Breiner and Kevin Sumida from representing defendants Katherine and Louis Kealoha. The motion argues Breiner and Sumida have conflicts of interest that prevent them from providing competent representation due to their simultaneous representation of both Kealohas and other past representations. Specifically, Breiner previously represented plaintiffs suing Louis Kealoha for civil rights violations and a defendant prosecuted by Katherine Kealoha. Sumida may be a witness in the current case. The motion asks the court to disqualify both attorneys to avoid ethical issues and ensure the trial proceeds fairly.
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of Eligio Cedeño v. Castillo. The order affirms the district court's dismissal of Cedeño's RICO complaint against various defendants for failure to state a claim. Specifically, it finds that Cedeño's complaint alleges an extraterritorial violation of RICO that the statute does not reach based on insufficient domestic conduct. It also rejects Cedeño's arguments that his claims fit within RICO's domestic focus and that RICO incorporates extraterritorial predicate offenses. The court further finds that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cedeño's request to amend his complaint.
benchmemo_evenwelvabbott
This case concerns a challenge to Texas's congressional redistricting plan, which is based on total population from census data rather than eligible voter population. The plaintiffs argue this dilutes some voters' influence. The Fifth Circuit dismissed the case, finding no substantial evidence of an equal protection violation. The respondents argue precedent requires using total population and the plan's population deviations are acceptable. The Supreme Court must consider whether to require apportionment based on eligible voter population instead of total population from the census.
FindLaw : Cal Prop. 8 Decision
This document summarizes a ruling by the Supreme Court of California regarding challenges to Proposition 8, a ballot initiative that amended the state constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. The court found that Proposition 8 constituted a valid constitutional amendment, rather than a revision, and was therefore properly enacted through the ballot initiative process. It determined that Proposition 8 had a narrow effect of reserving the designation of marriage for opposite-sex couples while leaving other rights of same-sex couples intact.
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
This document summarizes a court case from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia regarding claims brought by the Herero People's Reparations Corporation against Deutsche Bank AG. The plaintiffs allege that during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Deutsche Bank engaged in genocide, extermination, enslavement, and other atrocities against the Herero Tribe of Namibia in cooperation with the German government. Deutsche Bank filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the court lacks jurisdiction and the plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim. The court must determine if it has authority to consider the case on its merits before ruling on the motion to dismiss.
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive De...
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive Department's Engagement In Criminal Acts - Obama Administration Of Justice (President Barack Obama, United States Attorney Eric Holder, and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis)
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
3/6/2017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2005 - Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13096571268307866226&q=Castle+Rock+v.+Gonzales,+545+US+748+(2005)&hl=en&as_sdt=1006 1/17
545 U.S. 748 (2005)
TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO
v.
GONZALES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT BEST FRIEND OF HER DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN,
GONZALES ET AL.
No. 04-278.
Argued March 21, 2005.
Decided June 27, 2005.
Supreme Court of United States.
*750 John C. Eastman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Thomas S. Rice, Eric M. Ziporin, and Erik S.
Jaffe.
750
John P. Elwood argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Acting
Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Michael Jay Singer, and Howard S. Scher.
Brian J. Reichel argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.
We decide in this case whether an individual who has obtained a state-law restraining order has a constitutionally *751 protected
property interest in having the police enforce the restraining order when they have probable cause to believe it has been
violated.
751
I
The horrible facts of this case are contained in the complaint that respondent Jessica Gonzales filed in Federal District Court.
(Because the case comes to us on appeal from a dismissal of the complaint, we assume its allegations are true. See
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U. S. 506, 508, n. 1 (2002).) Respondent alleges that petitioner, the town of Castle Rock,
Colorado, violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution when its police
officers, acting pursuant to official policy or custom, failed to respond properly to her repeated reports that her estranged husband
was violating the terms of a restraining order.[1]
The restraining order had been issued by a state trial court several weeks earlier in conjunction with respondent's divorce
proceedings. The original form order, issued on May 21, 1999, and served on respondent's husband on June 4, 1999,
commanded him not to "molest or disturb the peace of [respondent] or of any child," and to remain at least 100 yards from the
family home at all times. 366 F. 3d 1093, 1143 (CA10 2004) (en banc) (appendix to dissenting opinion of O'Brien, J.). The bottom
of the preprinted form noted that the reverse side contained "IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR RESTRAINED PARTIES AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS." Ibid. (emphasis deleted). The preprinted *752 text on the back of the form included the following
"WARNING":
752
"A KNOWING VIOLATION OF A RESTRAINING ORDER IS A CRIME . . . . A VIOLATION WILL ALSO CONSTITUTE
CONTEMPT OF COURT. YOU MAY BE ARRESTED WITHOUT NOTICE IF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER HAS
PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE KNOWINGLY VIOLATED THIS ORDER." Id., at 1144
(emphasis in original).
The preprinted text on the back of th ...
Dallas appellate lawyer Chad Ruback shares tips with trial attorneys
There is no document text provided to summarize. A document with content is required to generate a meaningful summary.
Similar to Ex. 110 (20)
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
Brayshaw v. City Of Tallahassee, 2010 - Landmark Case Striking Down The 1972...
Brayshaw v. City Of Tallahassee, 2010 - Landmark Case Striking Down The 1972...
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Rob Brayshaw v. Officer Annette Garrett Filed By Attorney Marie Mattox
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
Caso de EliGio Cedeño contra Juan Felipe Lara Fernández
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive De...
06/08/10 - REQUESTS FOR RESPONSE & AFFIDAVITS BY JUNE 23, 2010 - Executive De...
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
Dallas appellate lawyer Chad Ruback shares tips with trial attorneys
Dallas appellate lawyer Chad Ruback shares tips with trial attorneys
More from Embajada del Ecuador en Washington
Ex. 134
- The document is a letter from the Ecuadorian Attorney General's office responding to an order to attach $96 million that the Ecuadorian government allegedly owes to Chevron.
- The order was issued in relation to an arbitration award against Ecuador in favor of Chevron, but Ecuador is appealing the award. As such, there is no definitive debt owed to Chevron at this time.
- The Attorney General argues that the funds ordered for attachment are protected and not subject to attachment under Ecuadorian law. He asks that the order be revoked.
Ex. 133
This document is an award from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal regarding claims brought by SEDCO, Inc. against the National Iranian Oil Company and Iran. SEDCO leased drilling rigs to NIOC through its subsidiary SISA. SEDCO alleges that after contract termination in 1979, NIOC appropriated the rigs by failing to assist with export as required and continuing to operate the rigs in Iran. NIOC argues it did not take possession of the rigs until 1980 and was only obligated to use best efforts to help with export. The tribunal must determine whether NIOC's actions around contract termination and after amounted to a taking of the rigs for which compensation is due.
Ex. 132
The Tribunal was seized with requests from both parties regarding interim measures and jurisdiction. Regarding interim measures, the Tribunal ordered an expert to commence inventorying goods stored by Claimant and transferred some goods to a more suitable warehouse. The Tribunal also ordered Respondents to deposit additional funds to cover expert costs. However, the Tribunal declined to fully grant Respondents' request to transfer all goods, reserving final jurisdiction determination. The Tribunal invited both parties to submit evidence on jurisdiction by a set deadline.
Ex. 131
Este documento presenta la declaración suplementaria de Fabián Andrade Narváez sobre la ley ecuatoriana en respuesta a los informes de los expertos de Chevron. Andrade concluye lo siguiente: 1) La ley ecuatoriana permite atravesar el velo corporativo en circunstancias excepcionales para prevenir fraude; 2) La ley ecuatoriana establece una presunción de responsabilidad para actividades peligrosas como las hidrocarburíferas; 3) La ley permite la acumulación de demandas civ
Ex. 130
1) El documento presenta la declaración de tres expertos en derecho ecuatoriano que buscan corregir errores en la interpretación de la ley ecuatoriana realizada por abogados de Texaco. 2) Explican que, según la ley ecuatoriana, el Estado solo puede adoptar obligaciones contractuales de forma expresa y por escrito. La doctrina del "estoppel" no se aplica. 3) Argumen que las actividades de CEPE relacionadas con hidrocarburos son de carácter público y sus actos y contratos se rigen por derecho público
Ex. 129
The Republic of Ecuador informs the Tribunal that on February 17, 2012, the Sole Division of the Provincial Court of Sucumbíos declared the judgment against Chevron in the Lago Agrio case to be enforceable under Ecuadorian law. The Court denied Chevron's request to suspend enforceability pending appeal or require Chevron to post a bond. The Court examined its obligations under the Tribunal's First Interim Award and international human rights treaties and found the treaties prevailed. The Republic provided the original Spanish decision and English translation.
Ex. 128
The Respondent informs the Tribunal that it has taken measures to implement the Interim Award issued on January 25, 2011. Specifically, the Attorney General of Ecuador issued notices of the Award on January 26, 2011 to the President of Ecuador, Judiciary Council, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and appellate judges. Given the transition of judges at the National Court, notice was sent to its President on January 31. Through these official communications, the various branches of the Ecuadorian State were notified of the Interim Award and directed to suspend enforcement or recognition of any judgments against Chevron.
Ex. 127
El juez Lilia Marlene Ortiz Vásquez emitió una orden en un caso judicial entre María Aguinada y otros contra Adolfo Callejas Rivadeneira. La orden aprueba el informe del liquidadora de costas y ordena a Chevron Corporation a pagar $19,041,414,529 dólares estadounidenses o entregar propiedad equivalente en un plazo de 24 horas para satisfacer la sentencia. El juez también rechazó varias mociones presentadas por la defensa.
Ex. 126
This letter from King & Spalding LLP to members of an arbitration tribunal requests interim measures in an ongoing arbitration between Chevron Corporation, Texaco Petroleum Company, and the Republic of Ecuador. It summarizes recent developments in related litigation in Ecuadorian courts, including the issuance of an order finalizing the evidence period and allowing for imminent judgment, as well as newly discovered evidence of plans by opposing parties to immediately attach assets and disrupt Chevron's global operations. The letter argues interim measures are urgently needed to protect the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction and ability to provide meaningful relief by suspending enforceability of any imminent Ecuadorian court judgment.
Ex. 125
1) The Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory establishes procedures for transmitting and executing letters rogatory, or requests for judicial assistance, between member states of the Organization of American States for civil and commercial matters.
2) Letters rogatory must meet certain requirements like being properly legalized and translated before they can be executed. They can be transmitted through judicial, diplomatic, or central authority channels.
3) The convention provides rules for how letters rogatory will be executed according to the laws of the receiving state and allocates responsibility for costs. It also allows some flexibility if requested by the issuing state.
Ex. 124
This document outlines an international convention to abolish the requirement of legalization for foreign public documents. Key points:
1) It applies to public documents produced between contracting states, including documents from courts/tribunals, administrative documents, notarial acts, and official certificates.
2) Each state will exempt covered documents from legalization requirements. Legalization refers only to certifying authenticity of signatures and authority of those signing.
3) An apostille certificate placed on the document is the only formality required between contracting states to certify authenticity and authority. This simplifies legalization requirements.
Ex. 123
The document summarizes proceedings in the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbíos regarding enforcement of an environmental judgment against Chevron. It orders the expansion of trademarks attached to include additional Chevron and Texaco brands. It denies Chevron's request to revoke the enforcement order, finding the arguments on jurisdiction and alleged procedural flaws have already been rejected in prior rulings. It authorizes letters rogatory to be sent to foreign authorities to aid enforcement efforts against Chevron abroad.
Ex. 122
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), International Court of Justice, Order on Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (Feb. 5, 2003)
Ex. 121
Supreme Court Decision, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 83, Official Registry Supplement 323, May 10, 2001
Ex. 120
Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 162, Official Register 664, Sept. 17, 2002
Ex. 119
Este documento presenta la Ley para el Juzgamiento de la Colusión de 1977. La ley establece procedimientos para procesar actos colusorios fraudulentos entre dos o más personas con el objetivo de causar daño a terceros. La ley otorga jurisdicción a los jueces civiles y comerciales para procesar casos de colusión y establece procedimientos de apelación. También invalida actos afectados por colusión y ordena restaurar la situación anterior.
Ex. 117
Navarrete v. Carbo, Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Official Gazette No. 14, Nov. 10, 2003
Ex. 116
1) El documento presenta la declaración jurídica de Fabián Andrade Narváez, un experto ecuatoriano, sobre varias alegaciones de errores judiciales y violaciones al debido proceso en el litigio de Lago Agrio.
2) Andrade Narváez resume sus conclusiones sobre temas como el momento para adjudicar defensas preliminares, la supuesta unión inapropiada de demandas, los alegados desvíos del procedimiento aplicable en conexión con las inspecciones judiciales, la aplicación retroactiva alegada de la LMA
Ex. 115
Este documento presenta extractos del Código de Procedimiento Civil de 1987 de Ecuador. Establece reglas sobre diferentes aspectos del proceso judicial civil, incluyendo procedimientos ordinarios y especiales, presentación de pruebas y evidencia, nombramiento y rol de peritos, y emisión de sentencias.
Ex. 114
Petition for Precautionary Measures against Ecuador in the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights filed by Lago Agrio Plaintiffs (Feb. 9, 2012)
More from Embajada del Ecuador en Washington (20)
Recently uploaded
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
原版制作(Hope毕业证书)利物浦霍普大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(Hope毕业证书)利物浦霍普大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PFMS) and DBT.pptx
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PFMS) and DBT - EXPLANATION
Border towns and spaces of (in)visibility.pdf
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Milton Keynes Hospital Charity - A guide to leaving a gift in your Will
A forever thank you in your Will to Milton Keynes University Hospital can change lives for years to come.
World Food Safety Day 2024- Communication-toolkit.
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
Presentation by Molly Dahl, CBO's Long-Term Analysis Unit Chief, at a conference organized by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
在线办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality UpdatesTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business Meeting快速办理(Bristol毕业证书)布里斯托大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(Bristol毕业证书)布里斯托大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Land degradation, desertification and drought resilience. UN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME -WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY 2024.
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAY
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
Recently uploaded (20)
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PFMS) and DBT.pptx
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PFMS) and DBT.pptx
Milton Keynes Hospital Charity - A guide to leaving a gift in your Will
Milton Keynes Hospital Charity - A guide to leaving a gift in your Will
World Food Safety Day 2024- Communication-toolkit.
World Food Safety Day 2024- Communication-toolkit.
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Ex. 110
- 1. Mr. R. Doak Bishop Mr. Wade M. Coriell Ms. Isabel Fernández de la Cuesta Mr. David Weiss Ms. Elizabeth Silbert Ms. Sara McBrearty King & Spalding LLP 1100 Louisiana, Suite 4000 Houston, TX 77002 USA BY E-MAIL: DBISHOP@KSLAW.COM, WCORIELL@KSLAW.COM, IFERNANDEZ@KSLAW.COM, DWEISS@KSLAW.COM, ESILBERT@KSLAW.COM, SMCBREARTY@KSLAW.COM, ZRSILVERMAN@KSLAW.COM Mr. Edward G. Kehoe Ms. Caline Mouawad King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 USA BY E-MAIL: EKEHOE@KSLAW.COM, CMOUAWAD@KSLAW.COM Prof. Jan Paulsson Mr. Luke Sobota Three Crowns LLP BY E-MAIL: JAN.PAULSSON@THREECROWNSLLP.COM, LUKE.SOBOTA@THREECROWNSLLP.COM Dr. Diego García Carrión Procurador General del Estado Procuraduría General del Estado República del Ecuador Avenida Amazonas N39-123 y Arízaga Edificio Amazonas Plaza, 5to piso Quito Ecuador BY E-MAIL: DGARCIA@PGE.GOB.EC, BGOMEZ@PGE.GOB.EC, CGAIBOR@PGE.GOB.EC, LAGUILAR@PGE.GOB.EC, CVITERI@PGE.GOB.EC, JSPER@PGE.GOB.EC Mr. Ricardo Ugarte Mr. Eric W. Bloom Mr. Tomás Leonard Ms. Nicole Silver Ms. Kathy Ames Valdivieso Winston & Strawn LLP 1700 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006-3817 USA BY E-MAIL: RUGARTE@WINSTON.COM, EBLOOM@WINSTON.COM, TLEONARD@WINSTON.COM, NSILVER@WINSTON.COM, KAMES@WINSTON.COM, ECRUZ@WINSTON.COM Prof. Eduardo Silva Romero Dr. Alvaro Galindo Dechert LLP BY E-MAIL: EDUARDO.SILVAROMERO@DECHERT.COM, ALVARO.GALINDO@DECHERT.COM Prof. Pierre Mayer BY E-MAIL: MAYER@PIERREMAYER.COM CT-E II 205733 21 July 2017 DIRECT DIAL: +31 70 302 4140 E-MAIL: MDOE@PCA-CPA.ORG RE: PCA CASE N° 2009-23 1. CHEVRON CORPORATION (U.S.A.) 2. TEXACO PETROLEUM COMPANY (U.S.A.) V. THE REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR
- 2. CT-E II 205733 21 July 2017 Page 2 of 2 Dear Mesdames, Dear Sirs, The Tribunal refers to the Respondent’s application made by letter dated 12 July 2017, opposed by the Claimants by letter dated 19 July 2019. By its application, the Respondent requests the Tribunal to order the prompt dissolution of the First, Second, and Fourth Interim Awards dated 25 January 2012, 16 February 2012 and 7 February 2013 respectively. (The grounds for this application are not the same as the Respondent’s pending application for the Tribunal’s reconsideration of these Interim Awards which is scheduled for Track III under Procedural Order No. 23). The Tribunal requests the Parties to address in writing the following queries arising from the Respondent’s current application and the Parties’ recent correspondence related to that application. First, the Claimants are requested to elaborate on their references to enforcement proceedings currently taking place elsewhere than Canada, Brazil and Argentina (see p. 3 of the Claimants’ letter). Second, the Respondent is requested to comment on the account provided by the Claimants as a factual chronology of the progress to date of the enforcement proceedings in Canada, Brazil and Argentina (see pp. 4-5 of the Claimants’ letter). Third, the Respondent and the Claimants are requested to address further, insofar as relevant to the Respondent’s current application, the decision of The Hague Court of Appeal of 18 July 2017, and to provide copies of that decision in Dutch and, if possible, agreed English translation (see footnote 6 of the Respondent’s letter; and p. 2 of the Claimants’ letter). The Parties are invited to respond to these requests as soon as practicable. Yours sincerely, Martin Doe Senior Legal Counsel cc: Dr. Horacio A. Grigera Naón (by separate e-mail: hgrigeranaon@yahoo.com, hgnlaw@gmail.com) Professor Vaughan Lowe QC (by separate e-mail: vlowe@essexcourt.net) Mr. V.V. Veeder QC (by separate e-mail: vvveeder@londonarbitrators.net) Ms. Jessica Wells (by separate e-mail: jwells@essexcourt.net)