- The document is a letter from the Ecuadorian Attorney General's office responding to an order to attach $96 million that the Ecuadorian government allegedly owes to Chevron.
- The order was issued in relation to an arbitration award against Ecuador in favor of Chevron, but Ecuador is appealing the award. As such, there is no definitive debt owed to Chevron at this time.
- The Attorney General argues that the funds ordered for attachment are protected and not subject to attachment under Ecuadorian law. He asks that the order be revoked.
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSamuel Partida
A list of common motions filed in a criminal case related to the bail bond are provided. Six sample motions are provided that a prosecutor may typically file. Seven sample motions are provided that a defense attorney may typically file over the span of a typical criminal case.
A fictitious legal brief to remit the final judgment of bail forfeiture. Capt. Bryant issued a bond for the release of Rutger Batty who later failed to appear in court. Mr. Batty was in a Texas jail because of a prior illegal gun possession charge. Though Mr. Batty was not incarcerated in a North Carolina jail or a federal prison within the United States, Captain Bryant wants Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. to try and get the forfeited bail money remitted.
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- Kaaihue, a five year litigation and court battle. When NECA board of directors, and community are jealous for driving right by a property that could have been purchased, but was inherited by Angela Kaaihue, who has turned the property she inherited into a Hawaiian Gold Mine.
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSamuel Partida
A list of common motions filed in a criminal case related to the bail bond are provided. Six sample motions are provided that a prosecutor may typically file. Seven sample motions are provided that a defense attorney may typically file over the span of a typical criminal case.
A fictitious legal brief to remit the final judgment of bail forfeiture. Capt. Bryant issued a bond for the release of Rutger Batty who later failed to appear in court. Mr. Batty was in a Texas jail because of a prior illegal gun possession charge. Though Mr. Batty was not incarcerated in a North Carolina jail or a federal prison within the United States, Captain Bryant wants Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. to try and get the forfeited bail money remitted.
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- Kaaihue, a five year litigation and court battle. When NECA board of directors, and community are jealous for driving right by a property that could have been purchased, but was inherited by Angela Kaaihue, who has turned the property she inherited into a Hawaiian Gold Mine.
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Anhing v. Viet Phu - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's feesRobert Scott Lawrence
Order denying defendant Viet Phu's post-trial motion for attorneys fees, noting that under the Lanham Act a prevailing defendant is only entitled to fees in exceptional cases.
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community Association
ANGELA KAAIHUE -VS- NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION- OPENING BRIEF CAAP-19-0000806
NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6770 / 2013 (SLP. 1427 of 2009)- India- Pending disciplinary action should not be a barrier for an employee for availing Pension and Gratuity. Uploaded by T James joseph Adhikarathil, Kottayam -ക്രിമിനൽ -വകുപ്പു തല നടപടികൾ നേരിടുന്ന കാരണത്താൽ ഒരു വ്യക്തിയുടെ പെൻഷനും ഗ്രാറ്റുവിറ്റിയും തടയാൻ പറ്റില്ലെന്നുള്ള state of Jharkhand vs jitendrakumar കേസിലെ വളരെ പ്രധാനപ്പെട്ട സുപ്രീം കോടതി വിധി
Sample petition for final distribution for probate in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
This sample petition for final distribution in a probate case in California is filed to request that the Court make an order of final distribution and approve the statutory compensation for the personal representative and their attorney. The sample petition on which this preview is based is 18 pages and includes brief instructions, a sample summary of account, sample exhibits to support the summary of account and a sample verification. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Anhing v. Viet Phu - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's feesRobert Scott Lawrence
Order denying defendant Viet Phu's post-trial motion for attorneys fees, noting that under the Lanham Act a prevailing defendant is only entitled to fees in exceptional cases.
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community Association
ANGELA KAAIHUE -VS- NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION- OPENING BRIEF CAAP-19-0000806
NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6770 / 2013 (SLP. 1427 of 2009)- India- Pending disciplinary action should not be a barrier for an employee for availing Pension and Gratuity. Uploaded by T James joseph Adhikarathil, Kottayam -ക്രിമിനൽ -വകുപ്പു തല നടപടികൾ നേരിടുന്ന കാരണത്താൽ ഒരു വ്യക്തിയുടെ പെൻഷനും ഗ്രാറ്റുവിറ്റിയും തടയാൻ പറ്റില്ലെന്നുള്ള state of Jharkhand vs jitendrakumar കേസിലെ വളരെ പ്രധാനപ്പെട്ട സുപ്രീം കോടതി വിധി
Sample petition for final distribution for probate in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
This sample petition for final distribution in a probate case in California is filed to request that the Court make an order of final distribution and approve the statutory compensation for the personal representative and their attorney. The sample petition on which this preview is based is 18 pages and includes brief instructions, a sample summary of account, sample exhibits to support the summary of account and a sample verification. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.
The Competition Superintendence (CS) disagrees with the Constitutional Tribunal of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) for admitting the constitutional guarantees suits filed by CTE and PERSONAL.
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Steven de Koenigswarter and Associated En...Theworld Crawler
Court order from the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario, Canada. The order is dated July 4, 2023, and it is addressed to Steven de Koenigswarter, Luc Georges de Clerck, the de Koenigswarter Family Trust, the Health Factory Holding BV, and Venator International SA.
The order states that a legal proceeding has been commenced against the defendants by the plaintiff, 2705564 Ontario Inc. The claim made against the defendants is set out in the statement of claim that was served with the notice of action
The Supreme Courts jurisprudence of P. R. 2003 2003 DTS 1.docxssusera34210
The Supreme Court's jurisprudence of P. R. 2003
2003 DTS 121 LAS Marías REFRENCE LAB V. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN 2003TSPR121
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Las Marías Reference Laboratory Corp.
Demandante-Recurrido
V.
Municipality of San Juan
Demandado-Peticionario
Certiorari
TSPR 2003 121
DPR 159 ____
Case Number: DC-2002-725
Date: July 15 2003
Circuit Court of Appeals: Regional Circuit I
Judge Rapporteur: Hon. Dolores Rodriguez of Oronoz
Lawyers from the petitioner: Lcdo. Ivan Castro Ortiz
Lcdo. Simone Cataldi Malpica
Counsel for the defendant: Lcdo. Orlando Fernandez
Subject: collection of money, contract. Municipality not liable for the debt. The non-referral of a municipal contract to the Office of the Comptroller, as required by the Autonomous Municipalities Law, makes this one ineffective and unenforceable. Court orders that all municipalities regulate on this area to comply with this requirement for bill and recommends to the private parties to enforce this requirement of law before making any delivery.
WARNING
This document is an official document of the Supreme Court that it is subject to changes and corrections of the compilation process and official publication of the decisions of the Court. Its electronic distribution is done as a public service to the community.
Court Opinion issued by the Judge associated JEHOVAH CORRADA DEL RIO
San Juan, Puerto Rico on July 15 2003.
We must resolve if the non-referral of a municipal contract to the Office of the Comptroller, as required by the Autonomous Municipalities Law, makes this one ineffective and unenforceable.
By understanding that compliance with this requirement is a constitutive element of all municipal contract, resolve in the affirmative.
I
Las Marías Reference Laboratory Corp. (Hereinafter, "Las Marias") has filed a lawsuit in recovery of money against the Municipality of San Juan (hereinafter, "the Village") by the amount of $510,659.80 . [ 1] By the claim, the Marys argued that the aforementioned debt arose from a contract it had signed with the Municipality, in which this would provide clinical laboratory services to indigent residents of San Juan. [ 2] The alleged services were provided for various periods between the 1 of August 1994 and 30 June 1997. [endnoteRef:1][endnoteRef:2] [1: Footnotes
[ 1] The demand was presented on 28 August 1997. See Appendix, p. 1.
] [2: [ 2] The services were provided to the patients of programs such as "San Juan AIDS" and "Mental Health", as well as other attached to the Department of Health of the Capital. See petition for certiorari , p. 3.
]
Subsequently, the parties presented before the Court of First Instance, Upper Chamber of San Juan (hereinafter, "TPI") a stipulation of partial Judgment, through which they agreed that the municipality would satisfy the amount of $244,544.50 in partial payment of the amount owed. [ 3] As a result, the TPI proceeded to sentencing by the partial amount stipul ...
The following documents were submitted by the Republic of Ecuador to the international arbitration hearing the case between Chevron/Texaco and the Republic. These documents further show the impact of Chevron/Texaco’s decades’ long oil pollution on the people of Ecuador.
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), International Court of Justice, Order on Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (Feb. 5, 2003)
Roy E. Hofer, Supreme Court Reversal Rates: Evaluating the Federal Courts of Appeals, LANDSLIDE, Jan. – Feb. 2010, available at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/intelprop/magazine/LandslideJan2010_Hofer.authcheckdam.pdf
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
1. Robles 731 y Av. Amazonas – Quito, Ecuador – PBX: (593 2)-2 562 080
www.pge.gob.ec
CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
Attorney General’s Office
Ecuador
TO THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF
SUCUMBIOS:
I, Attorney Marcos Arteaga Valenzuela, National Director of Legal Representation, Delegate of
the Attorney General, in accordance with Articles 2 and 6 of the Law Governing the Attorney
General’s Office and Articles 17 and 18 of its Functional Organic Regulations, in Summary
Verbal Proceeding No. 0002-2003-P-CPJS filed by María Aguinda et al. against Chevron
Corporation, appear before you and state:
On October 17, 2012, I received your Official Letter No. 200-P-CPJS-2012, to which you attach
the order you issued on October 15, 2012, at 4:53 p.m., in Summary Verbal Proceeding No.
0002-2003-P-CPJS, advising us that you have ordered “the attachment of US $96,355,369 of the
award against the Government of Ecuador in the arbitration proceeding brought by Chevron
and Texaco with the Republic of Ecuador, publicly known as the Chevron II Case.” The official
letter also orders the Attorney General to take the necessary actions and inform the Court of the
actions undertaken to ensure the attachment. In response, I would like to make the following
comments:
As a basic premise, it must be made clear that neither the Attorney General nor the State of
Ecuador is a party to the proceeding or has participated in Summary Verbal Proceeding No.
0002-2003-P-CPJS.
The order in question, issued by Dr. Wilfrido Erazo Araujo in his capacity as Deputy President of
the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbíos on October 15, 2012, at 4:53 p.m., in Summary
Verbal Proceeding No. 0002-2003-P-CPJS, orders the attachment of monies that, according to
the order, the Government of Ecuador “owes” Chevron Corporation by virtue of the arbitration
award issued in the arbitration proceeding known as “Chevron II.” That order erroneously
establishes that “the Government of Ecuador owes the judgment debtor” the amount of
$96,355,369 “as a result of an arbitration award.”
On August 31, 2011, the arbitration tribunal in case AA277, formed under the arbitration rules of
the U.N. Commission on Trade Law, issued its final award in the proceeding filed by Chevron
Corporation against the Republic of Ecuador and ordered the Ecuadorian State to pay
compensation equivalent to
[handwritten: 3] [initials]
2. Robles 731 y Av. Amazonas – Quito, Ecuador – PBX: (593 2)-2 562 080
www.pge.gob.ec
CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
Attorney General’s Office
Ecuador
$96,355,369.17, including interest. The Republic of Ecuador rejected the tribunal’s decision and
filed for judicial review of the award before the courts of The Hague, which was the seat of the
arbitration. On May 2, 2012, the District Court of The Hague issued a judgment to the effect that
there was no basis for annulling the award and, consequently, rejected Ecuador’s petitions. On
August 2, 2012, the Republic of Ecuador appealed the judgment issued by the District Court. The
appeal is pending resolution.
Moreover, the District Court of The Hague granted Ecuador measures against enforcement of the
Award and placed it on what is known as the “Grey List” of awards. This means that the Court
has taken into consideration the objections raised against enforcement and could, in the future,
invite the parties to present their arguments before it hands down a decision.
After Ecuador filed the appeal of the decision of the District Court of The Hague, on October 2,
2012, the Court affirmed the measures against enforcement of the Award in the case known as
“Chevron II.” Consequently, there is currently no debt or obligation that can be demanded in
favor of Chevron Corporation.
Moreover, on July 27, 2012, Chevron Corporation filed, with the Court of the District of
Colombia in the United States of America, a petition for recognition and enforcement of the
aforementioned award, in application of the New York Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The proceeding is pending and the Republic of
Ecuador has the right to challenge it.
Therefore, the order to attach $96,355,369 is premature since the Court of Appeals could reverse
the arbitration tribunal’s decision. Since Chevron’s right to obtain the respective compensation is
uncertain until the judicial proceeding has been resolved and is final, there is no demandable
obligation, so the attachment order cannot be enforced under the prescribed terms and conditions,
because to do so would be to recognize the right to collect mere expectations, which is not a right
under Article 7(6) of the Civil Code. To Guillermo Cabanellas, “Debt” is what the debtor in the
obligational relationship owes the creditor
[initials]
2
[handwritten: 4]
3. Robles 731 y Av. Amazonas – Quito, Ecuador – PBX: (593 2)-2 562 080
www.pge.gob.ec
CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
Attorney General’s Office
Ecuador
thereof. In this case there is no obligation demandable of the Ecuadorian State in favor of
Chevron Corporation.
Further, the duties of the Attorney General are defined in Art. 237 of the Constitution of the
Republic and Art. 3 of the Law Governing the Attorney General’s Office. These are representing
the State in court and legal representation of the State and its institutions, as per the constitutional
rule quoted below:
“Art. 237.- In addition to the other duties established by law, the Attorney General shall be
responsible for the following:
1. Representation of the State in court.
2. Legal representation of the State and its institutions
3. To provide legal counsel to and answer legal questions from public-sector bodies and entities
concerning knowledge or application of the law, on those matters for which the Constitution or
the law does not grant this authority to some other authority or body.
4. To oversee, subject to the law, the acts and contracts signed by public-sector bodies and
entities.”
Consequently, the Attorney General is not responsible for “taking the necessary actions” with
respect to an attachment order, [or] enforcing judgments or decisions, in any court case, since, as
mentioned, those are not his duties.
Therefore, your order, transcribed in Official Letter No. 200-P-CPJS-2012, is inappropriate since
the Attorney General does not have the authority to comply with your order.
Regardless of the foregoing, I should note that with respect to section F(5) and (6) of the order
you issued on October 15, 2012, at 4:53 p.m., in Summary Verbal Proceeding No. 0002-2003-P-
CPJS, the attachment ordered deals with monies that cannot be attached.
In fact, under Article 1634 of the Civil Code and Article 441 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the
property that the Special Laws declare to not be subject to attachment cannot be attached. In this
respect, Article 170 of the Law Governing Planning and Public Finance provides:
[handwritten: 5] [initials]
3
4. Robles 731 y Av. Amazonas – Quito, Ecuador – PBX: (593 2)-2 562 080
www.pge.gob.ec
CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
Attorney General’s Office
Ecuador
“Art. 170.- Judgments.- …The funds of the Sole Account of the Treasury are not subject to
attachment and may not be the object of any kind of court order to enforce compliance,
preventive measure, or precautionary measure.” (Emphasis added)
It is clear that the monies in the Sole Account of the Treasury are not subject to attachment.
Therefore, Your Honor, I ask that you revoke the order you issued on October 15, 2012, at 4:53
a.m., with respect to section F(5) and (6).
Please send notifications intended for me to judicial mailbox No. 08.
I attach a certified copy of the Personnel Action attesting to the capacity in which I appear.
[signature]
Attorney Marcos Arteaga Valenzuela
NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION
DELEGATE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
REGISTRATION 3632 Guayas Bar Association
No. 21100-2003-0002
Filed in Lago Agrio today, Monday, the twenty-second of October, two thousand twelve, at
11:24 a.m. Attachments: 1. I certify.
[signature]
DR. ROMULO SARITAMA NAULA
RECORDING CLERK (A)
4
[handwritten: 6]
5. CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
[Symbol] ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE PERSONNEL ACTION
No. 081 DNDHyC Date: March 14, [cut off]
ARTEAGA VALENZUELA
Surnames
MARCOS EDISON
Given names
0901499905
Citizen ID card Voter certification
Effective:
March 14, 2011
[cut off] of ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: APPOINTMENT
[cut off]: TO APPOINT ATTORNEY MARCOS EDISON ARTEAGA VALENZUELA, NATIONAL
DIRECTOR, IN [THE] NATIONAL OFFICE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL’S OFFICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLES No. 17(c), ARTICLE 83(a), SECTION
a.5 AND ARTICLE 85 OF THE LAW GOVERNING THE PUBLIC SERVICE.
CURRENT POSITION
Administrative Unit:
[cut off] work:
Unified Monthly Remuneration:
Budget item:
PROPOSED POSITION
Administrative Unit: NATIONAL OFFICE OF LEGAL
REPRESENTATION
Position: NATIONAL DIRECTOR
Work location: QUITO
Unified Monthly Remuneration: $4,700.00
Budget item: 2011590000000000100000001A96510
[cut off] 105000000100000000-0280
NATIONAL OFFICE OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING
[signature] [illegible stamp]
Engineer John Maldonado Herrera
NATIONAL OFFICE OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING
This COPY matches the document
found in the archive of the respective
Office, and to which I refer if
necessary. I CERTIFY.
Date: [signature] 11 OCT. 2012
ATTORNEY LEONARDO GARCIA S.
[illegible]
Attorney General’s Office [cut off]
initials
[illegible stamp]
Signature: [signature]
Dr. Diego García Carrión
ATTORNEY GENERAL
SWORN STATEMENT
[cut off] under oath that I do not hold any
other office [cut off] Ecuadorian public
sector that would prevent me from
exercising these duties.
[signature]
Marcos Edison Arteaga Valenzuela
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT UNIT
REPLACES:
IN THE POSITION:
BY:
REGISTRATION: 107792611 [illegible stamp]
DATE: 14 MAR. 2011
Signature: [signature]
Mr. Patricio Vasco Mosquera
CHIEF 2 (HUMAN DEVELOPMENT UNIT)
6. CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
CERTIFICATION OF POSSESSION OF POSITION
I CERTIFY THAT ATTORNEY MARCOS EDISON ARTEAGA VALENZUELA TOOK THE
OATH REQUIRED BY LAW BEFORE ASSUMING THE POSITION OF NATIONAL
DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL OFFICE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, ON THIS DATE AT 10:00 A.M.
Quito, March 14, 2011
[signature]
John Maldonado Herrera
NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING
[handwritten: 2]