Evaluation of the objectives in greece english

2015-1-ES01-KA219-015927_1 THE EUROSCHOOL REPORTERS
Evaluation of the objectives in
each school (official marks)
before and after the project
GREECE

*The Evaluation of pupils‘ achievements was carried out on
the basis of their annual report results in 2014-2015 and
2016-2017.
The target groups of the evaluation were:
49 PUPILS of 2014 – 2015 Class aged 11 – 12 years old
(before the beginning of the project).
49 PUPILS of 2016 – 2017 Class aged 11 – 12 years old
(during and after the end of the project).

*The objectives of this evaluation were:
*To compare the performance of the 6th grade pupils of our school in the year 2014-15, in
all the subjects of the curriculum before the beginning of the program with the
performance of the 6th grade pupils in the class of 2016-17, during and after the end of the
program.
*To assess the development of the pupils during and after the implementation of the
program, by analyzing the official annual score they received at the end of each year.
*To control the qualitative participation of our school in such a program in reference to the
students' scores.
*To demonstrate all actions and activities, which had the most effective and qualitative
results in the pupils' learning process.
*The answer to one of the most basic questions which is posed whenever a school
participates in an ERASMUS program, namely: “what will the benefits be on a cognitive
level?”.

* The evaluation of the scores was done in the following lessons:
* English language
* Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).
* Religion.
* Greek language.
* Mathematics.
* History.
* Geography.
* Science.
* Social and Political Education (S.P.E.).
* Art.
* Music.
* Physical Education.

* Evaluation of the English Language
The euro-school reporters ”2015-1-ES01-KA219-015927_1
0%
2%
19%
16%
18%
45%
Κατάσταση βαθμολογίας Αγγλικών Στ τάξης 2014-2015
MARK 5
MARK 6
MARK 7
MARK 8
MARK 9
MARK 10

0%
4%
6%
28%
29%
33%
Κατάσταση βαθμολογίας Αγγλικών Στ τάξης 2016-2017
MARK 5
MARK 6
MARK 7
MARK 8
MARK 9
MARK 10

MARK 5 MARK 6 MARK 7 MARK 8 MARK 9 MARK 10
2014-15 0% 2% 19% 16% 18% 45%
2016-17 0% 4% 6% 28% 29% 33%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Βαθμολογία Αγγλικών Στ τάξης 2014-2015 & 2016-2017 σε %

*ANALYSIS
*ENGLISH LANGUAGE
*The grade of the students of the 6th grade, class 2014-2015,
prior to the ERASMUS program, in the English course, was:
*0% graduated with grade 5. 0 pupils
*2% graduated with grade 6. 1 pupil

*ANALYSIS
*ENGLISH LANGUAGE
*The grade of the students of the 6th grade, class 2016-2017,
after the end of the ERASMUS program, in the English course,
was:
*28,5% graduated with grade 8. 14 pupils

ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 5 ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 6 ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 7 ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 8 ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 9 ΒΑΘΜΟΣ 10
2015-16 2% 8% 18% 34% 24% 14%
2016-17 0% 4% 6% 28% 29% 33%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Βαθμολογία Αγγλικών Ε τάξης 2015-2016 & Στ τάξης 2016-2017 σε %

*ANALYSIS
*ENGLISH LANGUAGE
*We thought that it would be enlightening to mention the score of 48 pupils of the 5th
Grade in our school at the English course in the year 2015 - 16 where the ERASMUS
program started and compare it to the grade the same students took in the 6th grade in
the year 2016 - 17, at the end of the program:
*GRADE OF THE PUPILS OF THE 5TH GRADE IN THE YEAR 2015 – 16

*ANALYSIS
*ENGLISH LANGUAGE
*GRADE OF THE SAME PUPILS IN THE 6TH GRADE IN THE YEAR 2016 – 17

* Evaluation of the ICT
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
65%
2014-2015 ICT
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%
0%
0%
2%
33%
65%
2016-2017 ICT
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 65%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 2% 33% 65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
ICT

*ANALYSIS
*ICT
* The grade of the students of the 6th grade, class 2014-2015, prior to
the ERASMUS program, in the ICT course, was:
* 0% graduated with grade 5. 0 pupils

*ANALYSIS
*ICT
* The grade of the students of the 6th grade, class 2016-2017, after
the ERASMUS program, in the ICT course, was:
* 2% graduated with grade 8. 1 pupil

ΜΑΡΚ 5 ΜΑΡΚ 6 ΜΑΡΚ 7 ΜΑΡΚ 8 ΜΑΡΚ 9 ΜΑΡΚ 10
2015-2016 0% 0% 2% 4% 28% 66%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 2% 33% 65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Βαθμολογία ΤΠΕ E τάξης 2015-2016 & Στ τάξης 2016-2017 σε %

*ANALYSIS
*ICT
*We thought that it would be enlightening to mention the score of 48 pupils of the 5th
Grade in our school at the ICT course in the year 2015 - 16 where the ERASMUS program
started and compare it to the grade the same students took in the 6th grade in the year
2016 - 17, at the end of the program:

*ANALYSIS
*ICT

* Evaluation of the Religion
0%
0%
0%
8%
20%
72%
2014-2015 Religion
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0% 0% 0%
2%
16%
82%
2016-2017 Religion
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 8% 20% 72%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 2% 16% 82%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Religion

*ANALYSIS
*RELIGION

* Evaluation of the Greek Language
0%
2%
14%
20%
33%
31%
2014-2015 Greek Language
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0% 0% 0%
27%
53%
20%
2016-2017 Greek Language
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 2% 14% 20% 33% 31%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 27% 53% 20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Greek Language

*ANALYSIS
*GREEK LANGUAGE

* Evaluation of the Mathematics
0%
2%
16%
6%
37%
39%
2014-2015 Mathematics
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

* Evaluation of the Mathematics
0% 0% 0%
20%
39%
41%
2016-2017 Mathematics
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 2% 16% 6% 37% 39%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 20% 39% 41%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Mathematics

*ANALYSIS
*MATHEMATICS

* Evaluation of the History
0%
4%
10%
8%
37%
41%
2014-2015 History
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0% 0%
2%
12%
47%
39%
2016-2017 History
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 4% 10% 8% 37% 41%
2016-2017 0% 0% 2% 12% 47% 39%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
History

*ANALYSIS
*HISTORY

* Evaluation of the Geography
0%
2%
8%
16%
39%
35%
2014-2015 Geography
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%
0%
2%
0%
39%
59%
2016-2017 Geography
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 2% 8% 16% 39% 35%
2016-2017 0% 0% 2% 0% 39% 59%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Geography

*ANALYSIS
*GEOGRAPHY

* Evaluation of the Science
0% 0% 0%
14%
23%
63%
2014-2015 Science
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0% 0%
2%
6%
45%
47%
2016-2017 Science
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 14% 23% 63%
2016-2017 0% 0% 2% 6% 45% 47%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Science

*ANALYSIS
*SCIENCE

* Evaluation of the Social and Political Education
0%
0%
0%
6%
14%
80%
2014-2015 S.P.E.
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%0%
2%
0%2%
96%
2016-2017 S.P.E.
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 6% 14% 80%
2016-2017 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 96%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
S.P.E.

*ANALYSIS
*SOCIAL & POLITICAL EDUCATION

* Evaluation of the Art
0%0%0%0%
4%
96%
2014-2015 Art
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%0%0%0%
2%
98%
2016-2017 Art
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 96%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 98%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Art

*ANALYSIS
*ART

* Evaluation of the Music
0%
0%
0%
12%
63%
25%
2014-2015 Music
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%
0%
0%
12%
49%
39%
2016-2017 Music
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 12% 63% 25%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 12% 49% 39%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Music

*ANALYSIS
*MUSIC

* Evaluation of the Physical Education
0% 0% 0%
4%
18%
78%
2014-2015 Physical Education
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
86%
2016-2017 Physical Education
ΜΑΡΚ 5
ΜΑΡΚ 6
ΜΑΡΚ 7
ΜΑΡΚ 8
ΜΑΡΚ 9
ΜΑΡΚ 10

2014-2015 0% 0% 0% 4% 18% 78%
2016-2017 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 86%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Physical Education

*ANALYSIS
*Physical Education

*CONCLUSIONS
*In the ENGLISH LANGUAGE (class 2014 -15/ 2016 -17):
*In both student classes there were no pupils graded with 5.
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with a grade 6, has increased from 2% (1 pupil) to
4% (2 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7, was reduced from 19% (9 pupils) to
6% (3 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 16% (8 pupils) to
28,5% (14 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased from 18% (9 pupils) to 28,5%
(14 pupils).
33% (16 pupils),.
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program,
there was an improvement in the English language, because the reduced percentage of
pupils who graduated with grade 7 rose to grade 8, (+6 pupils /+13%), the percentage of
pupils who scored 9 increased by 10,5% / +5 pupils and while the percentage of pupils who
scored a 10 dropped per 12% (6 pupils), the overall percentage of pupils who scored 8, 9
and 10 has increased from 79% (39 pupils to 91% (45 pupils), +12% /6 pupils.

*CONCLUSIONS
*In the ENGLISH LANGUAGE for the same pupils (class 2015 -16/ 2016 -17):
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 5 was reduced from 2% (1 pupil) to 0%,.
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 6 was reduced from 8% (4 pupils) to 4% (2 pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 was reduced from 18% (9 pupils) to 6% (3
pupils),.
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 was reduced from 34% (16 pupils) to 28,5% (14
pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased from 24% (11 pupils) to 28,5% (14
pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 10 increased from 14% (7 pupils) to 33% (15
pupils).
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program, there was an
improvement in the English language skills for the same students who participated throughout the
program in the 5th and 6th grade (classes 2015-16 / 2016-17), because the reduced percentage of pupils
who graduated with grade 5 , 6, 7 and 8, moved to grade 9, (+3 pupils +6%) and grade 10 (+8 pupils
/+16%), while the percentage of pupils who scored a 9 increased by 4,5% (+3 students) and the
percentage of pupils who graduated with 10, increased from 14% (7 pupils) to 33% (15 pupils), (+
19%/8 pupils) whereas the total percentage of pupils rated with 9 and 10 increased, from 38% (18
pupils) to 61,5% (29 pupils), +23,5% / +11 students.

*CONCLUSIONS
*In ICT (2014 – 15/2016 – 17):
*There were no pupils who graded with grades 5,6 and 7.
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 0% to 2% (1
pupil).
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 was reduced from 35% (17
pupils) to 33% (16 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with a 10 was the same 65% (32 pupils).
From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program, there
was not a remarkable improvement in ICT course because the percentage of the pupils who
graduated with grade 9 was reduced by 2% (1 pupil) and the percentage of the pupils
who graduated with grade 10 was the same 65% (32 pupils).

*CONCLUSIONS
*In ICT (2015 – 16/2016 – 17):
*There were no pupils who graded with grades 5 and 6.
*There was only 1 pupil who graduated with a 7 (class of 2015 – 16).
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 0% to 2% (1
pupil).
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased from 28% (17 pupils)
to 33% (16 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with a 10 was the same 65% (32 pupils).
From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program, there
was not an improvement in ICT course because the percentage of the pupils who graduated
with grade 9 increased by 28% (13 pupils) to 33% (15 pupils) and in spite of the fact the
percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10 was the same 65% (32 pupils), the
general percentage of the pupils who graduated with 9 and 10 increased from 94% (45
pupils) to 98% (47 pupils), +4%/2 pupils.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN RELIGION:
*In both pupils’ classes, there were no students rated with grades 5,6,7.
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8, was reduced from 8% (4 pupils) to 2%
(1 pupil).
16% (8 pupils),.
*The proportion of pupils who graduated with grade 10 increased from 72% (35 pupils) to
82% (40 pupils).
there was an improvement in Religion course because the reduced percentage of the pupils
who graduated with grade 8 and grade 9 received a grade 10, +5 students /+10%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN THE GREEK LANGUAGE:
* In both student classes, there were no pupils rated with grade 5.
* In both student classes, there was only 1 pupil who graduated with grade 6 (2014 -15).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 was reduced, from 14% (7 pupils) to 0% (0 pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 20% (10 pupils) to 27% (13 pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased from 33% (16 pupils) to 53% (26 pupils).
* The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 10 has decreased from 31% (15 pupils) to 20% (10 pupils).
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program, there was an
improvement in the Greek language lesson because the reduced percentage of pupils who graduated with
grade 7 has passed to grade 8 and grade 9 (+3 pupils at grade 8 / +10 pupils in grade 9), the percentage of
pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased by 7% (3 pupils), the percentage of pupils who graduated with
grade 9 increased by 20%/+10 pupils and, while the percentage of pupils graduated with grade 10 diminished
by 11% (5 pupils), the overall percentage of pupils who scored grade 9 and 10 increased from 64%, (31 pupils)
to 73%, (36 pupils), (+9% / + 5 pupils).
 This improvement has a particular interest because, according to the Teachers ‘ Administration, the cognitive
level of the pupils in the class of 2014 - 15 in the Greek language lesson was particularly high and regardless
of that fact, there was still further improvement for those pupils of the 2016 – 17 class who, to begin with,
were not on a similar level and were included in the program!

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN MATHEMATICS:
*In both pupils’ classes, there were no students graded with a 5.
*In both pupils’ classes, there was only 1 pupil who graduated with grade 6 (2014 -15).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 was reduced, from 16% (8 pupils) to
0% (0 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 6% (3 pupils) to 20%
(10 pupils).
(19 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 10 has increased, from 39% (19 pupils)
to 41% (20 pupils).
there was an improvement in Mathematics because the reduced percentage of the pupils
who graduated with grade 7 passed to grade 8 and 9 (+7 pupils with grade 8 / +1 pupil
with grade 9), the percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 and 10 increased by
2% consecutively and, in general, the percentage of pupils who graduated with grades 8, 9
and 10 increased from 82% (40 pupils) to 100% (49 pupils ), + 9 pupils / + 18%.

*CONCLUSIONS
* IN HISTORY:
*In both pupils’ classes, there were only 2 pupils who graduated with grade 6 (2014 -15).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 was reduced from 10% (5 pupils) to 2%
(1 pupil).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 increased from 8% (4 pupils) to 12% (6
pupils).
(23 pupils).
39% (19 pupils).
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS program, there
was an improvement in History lesson because the reduced percentage of the pupils who
graduated with grade 7 passed to grades 8 and 9 (+2 pupils with grade 8 / +2 pupils with
grade 9), the percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased by 10%, and
although the percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10 reduced by 2%, the
general percentage of pupils who scored 8, 9 and 10 increased from 86% (42 pupils) to 98%
(48 pupils), + 6 pupils / + 12%.

*CONCLUSIONS
* IN GEOGRAPHY:
*In both pupils’ classes, there was only 1 pupil who graduated with grade 6 (2014 -15).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 was reduced from 8% (4 pupils) to 2%
(1 pupil).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8 was reduced, from 16% (8 pupils) to
0% (0 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who were graded with a 9, 39% (19 pupils) remained equal.
59% (29 pupils).
was an improvement in Geography lesson because the reduced percentage of the pupils who
graduated with grade 7 passed to grade 8 and grade 9 (+2 pupils with grade 8 / +2 pupils
with grade 9), the percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 (39%) remained the
same, while the percentage of students who graduated with grade 10 increased by 24%
(12 pupils) and the overall percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8, 9 and 10,
increased from 90% (44 students) to 98% (48 pupils) ), + 4 students / + 8%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN SCIENCE:
*In both pupils’ classes, there were no students who graded with 5 and 6.
*In both pupils’ classes, there was only 1 pupil who graded a 7 (2016 -17).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8, was reduced from 14% (7 students) to
6% (3 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased from 23% (11 students) to
45% (22 students).
*The proportion of pupils who graduated with grade 10 was reduced, from 63% (31 pupils) to
47% (23 pupils).
was an improvement in the lesson of Science because the reduced percentage of the pupils
who graduated with grade 8 progressed to grade 9 (+4 pupils with grade 9), the
percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9 increased by 22% /+11 students and
although the percentage of pupils who graduated with 10 decreased by 16% (8 pupils), the
overall percentage of pupils who scored 9 and 10 increased from 86% (42 pupils), to 92%
(45 pupils), + 3 pupils / + 6%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN SOCIAL & POLITICAL EDUCATION:
*In both pupils’ classes, there were no pupils who graded with 5 and 6.
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 7 increased from 0% to 2% (1 pupil).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 8, was reduced from 6% (3 students)
to 0% (0 pupils).
*The percentage of pupils who graduated with grade 9, was reduced from 14% (7 pupils)
to 2% (1 pupil).
96% (47 pupils).
there was an improvement in Social and Political Education lesson because the reduced
percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 progressed to grade 9 and 10,
and although the proportion of pupils who graduated with 9 decreased by 12% (6
pupils) the overall percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10 increased,
from 80% (39 pupils) to 96% (47 pupils), + 8 pupils / + 16%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN ART
*In both classes there were no pupils who graded with grade 5, 6, 7 and 8.
* The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 was reduced from 4% (2 pupils)
to 2% (1 pupil).
* The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10 increased from 96% (47 pupils)
to 98% (48 pupils).
there was an improvement in Art because the reduced percentage of the pupils who
graduated with grade 9 progressed to grade 10 and the percentage of the pupils
who graduated with grade 10 increased from 96% (47 pupils) to 98% (48 pupils), +1
pupil / +2%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN MUSIC
*In both classes there were no pupils who graded with grade 5, 6 and 7.
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 was the same in both classes
12% (6 pupils).
* The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 was reduced from 63% (31
pupils) to 49% (24 pupils).
to 39% (19 pupils).
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS
program, there was an improvement in Music course because besides the fact that
the percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 was the same 12%/6 pupils
the percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 decreased from 63% (31
pupils) to 49% (24 pupils), the percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10
increased from 25% (12 pupils) to 39% (19 pupils), +7 pupils / +14%.

*CONCLUSIONS
*IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
*In both classes there were no pupils who graded with grade 5, 6, and 7.
* The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 8 was reduced from 4% (2 pupils)
to 0% (0 pupils).
*The percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 9 was reduced from 18% (9 pupils)
to 14% (7 pupils).
to 86% (42 pupils).
 From the data above it can be surmised that after the end of the ERASMUS
program, there was an improvement in Physical Education because the percentage of
the pupils who graduated with grade 8 was reduced by 4%/-1 pupil and the
percentage of the pupils who graduated with grade 10 progressed to grade 10 from
78% (38 pupils) to 86% (42 pupils), +4 pupils/+8%.

Evaluation of the objectives in greece english

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Evaluation of the objectives in greece english

Similar to Evaluation of the objectives in greece english (20)

More from theeuroschoolreporters

More from theeuroschoolreporters (13)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Evaluation of the objectives in greece english