SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Valuable Sources of Resistance in the Ethiopian durum
                                      wheat landraces to Ug99 and other stem rust races
                                       Worku Denbel1* and Ayele Badebo2
                                       1 Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box. 489, Asella, Ethiopia
                                       2 Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

                                       *Corresponding author: workudi@yahoo.com

INTRODUCTION
Puccinia. graminis f.sp. tritici is one of the debilitating wheat diseases worldwide. For at least two decades, stem rust of
wheat was considered to be a disease of minor importance mainly due to the incorporation of Sr31 resistance gene in
many of the bread wheat cultivars; however, this gene succumbed to a new stem rust race called Ug99 (TTKSK)
(Pretorius et al., 2000). In Ethiopia, two types of wheat (hexaploid, Triticum aestivum L., and tetraploid, T. turgidum L)
are cultivated under rain-fed conditions mainly by resource-poor farmers. Durum wheat (T.turgidum subsp. durum Desf.)
is the predominating tetraploid, which is an indigenous crop in Ethiopia whereas bread wheat is an introduction, and most
of the high yielding semi-dwarf bread wheat varieties are susceptible to Ug99 and other races prevalent in the country. In
the absence of resistance in cultivated varieties, new sources of resistance are sought from landraces and related species.
Ethiopia is endowed with an immense genetic diversity for tetraploid wheat. All the six species of wheat observed by
Vavilov in the mid-1920s are still grown by farmers as landraces (IBC, 2007). The Ethiopian tetraploid landraces have
been identified to be potential sources of disease resistance including stripe and stem rust (Betesellassie et al., 2007; Haile
et al., 2012).

The high level of diversity in these landraces allows breeders and pathologists to make selection for different traits of
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Table 1. The reaction of selected durum wheat
economic importance. Therefore, the major objective of this study was to identify sources of resistance in the Ethiopian                                                                                                                               landraces to the prevailing stem rust races at Debre
durum wheat landraces to Ug99 and other prevailing races of stem rust at Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.                                                                                                                                                         Zeit in 2009 and 2010 seasons.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       No. Entries                      Stem rust severity
MATERIALS and METHODS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 2009    2010
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      (main (off-season)
A total of 991 durum wheat landraces collected from different areas of Ethiopia (Tigray, Gondar, Gojjam, Wollo, Shewa                                                                                                                                                                 season)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
and Kaffa) were used in this study. The collections were made and maintained as single lines by various researchers of                                                                                                                                     1    WC-1#29               TMR     10MR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
durum wheat improvement program of Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center. The experiment was conducted in 2009                                                                                                                                           2    WC-1#32               MRMS 15MSS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
and 2010 seasons. In 2009 main season, a total of 991 entries were tested whereas in 2010 off-season, 132 landraces                                                                                                                                        3    WC-1#109              RMR 15MRMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
selected from the main season were used. Each entry was planted in two rows of 1m length together with four checks                                                                                                                                         4    WC-2#7                TR      20MRMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
(PBW343, Morocco, Ude and Yerer). PBW343 is carrying Sr31 gene (Brama et al., 2003), Morocco (susceptible check),                                                                                                                                          5    WC-2#12               TR      20MRMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
Ude and Yerer are CIMMYT originated commercail durum wheat varieties in Ethiopia. The nursery was bounded by                                                                                                                                               6    WC-2#41               TR      20MR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
spreader rows planted with mixtures of susceptible durum (Arendeto and local red) and bread wheat (PBW343) varieties.                                                                                                                                      7    WC-2#80               TR      20MSMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
The spreader rows were inoculated three times starting from stem elongation with mixtures of TTKSK (Ug99) and other                                                                                                                                        8    WC-2#98               TR      5MRMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
races carrying virulences for stem rust resistance genes including Sr13 using the injection method (Roelfs et al., 1992).                                                                                                                                  9    WC-2#100              TMR     10MR
                                                                                                                                                                             Figure 1. Frequency (%) of landraces under different leaf                  1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           10   WC-3 #15              TMSMR 10MR
The rust assessment was made three times using the Modified Cobb’s scale (Peterson et al., 1948). The terminal severity                                                      rust resistance categories tested at Debre Zeit, 2009 main                 1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           11                         TR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                WC-3 #19                      10MRMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
was used to categorize the entries into resistant and susceptible groups. The severity was converted to coefficient of                                                       season (N= LR, 991)                                                           12   WC-4 #12              TR      20MSMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
infection (CI) values by multiplying the severity by constant values (Roelfs et al., 1992). The constant values are: R= 0.2,                                                                                                                               13   WC-4 #62              TR      20MSMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
MR=0.4, MS=0.8 and S=1. Based on the CI values, the entries were categorized under four resistant groups: The first                                                                                                                                        14   WC-4 #93              TR      5SMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
group included the landraces with 0-10% severity (resistant), the second with severity 15-20% (moderately resistant), and                                                                                                                                  15   WC - 12 # 40          TR      15MR
the third with severity of 25-30% moderately susceptible whereas the rest were considered as susceptible. However, only                                                                                                                                 1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           16   WC - 12 #66           TMS     15RMR
entries which combined leaf and stem rust resistances were advanced to the next stage of evaluation in 2010 off-season.                                                                                                                                 1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           17   WC -16 #31            TR      10R
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           18   WC -16 #37            TR      20RMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.

 RESULTS and DISCUSSION                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    19   WC -16 #57            TR      15MR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           20   WC -16 #145           TR      20RMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           21   DW-A- 4 #12           TMR     5RMR
In 2009 main season, the leaf rust diseases pressure was quite high, and out of the total entries tested, only 4.8% were                                                                                                                                1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           22   DW-A-3 #18            TMR     15MR
resistant, 13.2% were moderately resistant, 32.9% were moderately susceptible and the remaining 49.1% were                                                                                                                                              1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           23   DW-A-3 #20            TR      20RMR
completely susceptible to the disease (Figure 1). Leaf rust has been reported to be the most common disease wherever                                                                                                                                    1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           24   DW-A-3 #70            TR      20MR
durum landraces are grown (Huluka and Andnew, 1992). In this study, almost all of the durum wheat landraces                                                                                                                                             1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           25   DW-A-3 #73            TMR     5MS
exhibited susceptible or moderately susceptible reaction to leaf rust; however, they varied in terminal severities. The                                                                                                                                 1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           26   DW-K-1#57             TR      15MR
absence of complete resistance to leaf rust in the landraces is also in agreement with the previous reports (Andenow et                                                                                                                                 1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           27   DW-K-1#145            TR      20RMR
al., 1997; Huluka and Andenow, 1992). In Ethiopia, durum wheat and stem rust have co-evolved for thousands of                                                                                                                                           1.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           28                         TMR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                CD-1-#73                      5MS
years and this close association has resulted in the accumulation of a wider virulence spectrum on the side of the rust                                                                                                                                 29                            TMR
                                                                                                                                                                         Figure 2. Frequency (%) of landraces under different                                   Yerer                         30MRMS
(Bechere et al., 1995). The use of durum wheat parents with low level of moderately susceptible or moderately                                                            stem rust resistance categories tested at Debre Zeit,                          30                            5MR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Ude                           10MS
resistant infection types is a valuable and a recommended breeding strategy which has been utilized for durum wheat                                                      2009 main season (N= SR, 991)                                                  31      PBW343                50S     80S
improvement in Ethiopia (Bechere et al., 1995) and as a result of such breeding methodology a number of durum
wheat varieties have been released by Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center.
                                                                                                                                                                         In 2010 off-season the stem rust pressure was quite high and only 28 landraces were found to be
In 2009 main season, stem rust incidence was relatively low and the highest stem rust severity was 50% on susceptible                                                    resistant to stem rust. Those entries showed similar or low levels of stem rust reaction when compared
varieties. Out of 991 landraces evaluated for stem rust resistance, 79.5% exhibited resistance reaction, 10.6% were                                                      with the resistant durum wheat cultivars namely Yerer and Ude (Table 1). Out of these, 20 belong to
moderately resistant, 8% were moderately susceptible and the remaining 1.9% was completely susceptible (Figure 2).                                                       those collections from Wollo, two from Kaffa, five from Ambo, and one from Chefe Donsa. The stem
The low level of stem rust infection was attributed to the susceptibility of many of the landraces to leaf rust which                                                    rust disease pressure is often high in the off-seasons when compared to the main seasons even without
appeared early in the season. Under such circumstances, it was difficult to select for stem rust resistance under field                                                  artificial inoculation at Debre Zeit which might be due to favorable (warmer) temperatures in the off-
conditions since the tissue was being killed by leaf rust at early stages. Therefore, only 132 entries which combine                                                     season. Probably that was the reason that accounted for the high pressure of stem rust and low
stem and leaf rust resistances have been selected for the subsequent test.                                                                                               frequency of stem rust resistant landraces in the 2010 off-season compared to the 2009 main season.

                                                                                                                                                                         In this study, combined resistance to stem and leaf rust diseases have been identified in the 28
                                                                                                                                                                         Ethiopian durum wheat landraces. In previous reports, the Ethiopian durum landraces have been
                                                                                                                                                                         reported to be excellent sources of stem rust (Bechere et al., 2000) and powdery mildew resistance
                                                                                                                                                                         (Negassa, 1986). Furthermore, the importance of Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces as sources of
                                                                                                                                                                         resistance to wheat stem rust was reported by Betesellassie et al. (2007). This finding is further
                                                                                                                                                                         supported by the work of Dyck and Sykes (1995) as they found combined resistances to stem and leaf
                                                                                                                                                                         rust in the Ethiopian durum landraces. The Ethiopian durum wheat landrace, ST464 carrying Sr7a,
                                                                                                                                                                         Sr9e and Sr13 genes has been utilized as a source of resistance to stem rust in wheat breeding
                                                                                                                                                                         programs of many countries (Knott, 1996; Klindworth et al., 2007).

                                                                                                                                                                         In this study, 28 durum wheat landraces were found to be resistant to leaf and stem rust of wheat with
                                                                                                                                                                         combined virulence for TTKSK and other races with virulence for Sr13 and Sr9e and the leaf rust
                                                                                                                                                                         races prevailing in Debre Zeit.

                                                                                                                                                                         CONCLUSION

                                                                                                                                                                         The result showed that the Ethiopian durum landraces are potential sources of stem rust resistance and
                                                                                                                                                                         they could be exploited in wheat breeding programs.




  REFERENCES                                                                                                                                                             Huluka M., Andenow Y.1992. Variation within indigenous durum wheat germplasm for response to stem and leaf rust races in Ethiopia. In: The 7th
                                                                                                                                                                              Regional Wheat Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Nakuru, Kenya, September 16-19, 1991. CIMMYT. Tanner, D. G. and
  Andenow Y, Hulluka M, Belay G, Tesemma T. 1997. Resistance and tolerance to leaf rust in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces. Plant Breeding 116: 533-536.                 Mwangi, W. (eds.). pp. 131-134.
  Bechere E, Kebede H., and Belay G. 2000. Durum wheat in Ethiopia. An old crop in an ancient land. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research (IBCR),          IBC (Institute of Biodiversity Conservation). 2007. Ethiopia: Country Report on the State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture to
       Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 68 p.                                                                                                                                           FAO. 46p.
  Bechere E., Tessema T., Huluka M., Andenow Y. 1995. Breeding durum wheat for resistance to leaf and stem rusts in Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of a Regional              Klindworth DL., Miller JD, Jin Y, Xu SS. 2007. Chromosomal locations of genes for stem rust resistance in monogenic lines derived from tetraploid
       Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Njoro, Kenya, October 2-6, 1994. Breeding for disease resistance with emphasis on durability. Danial, D.            wheat accession ST464. Crop Science 47: 1441-1450.
       L. (ed.). pp. 125-132.                                                                                                                                            Knott DR. 1996. The transfer of stem rust resistance from the Ethiopian durum wheat St.464 to common wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science
  Betessilassie N., Fininsa C., Badebo A. 2007. Sources of resistance to stem rust (Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici) in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat accessions. Genetic        76: 317-319.
       Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 337-343.                                                                                                                         Negassa M. 1986. Estimates of phenotypic diversity and breeding potential of Ethiopian wheats. Hereditas 104: 41-48.
  Brama RN, Sivasamy M, Saikia A. 2003. New wheat lines with superior yield components and resistance to stem, leaf, and strip rust. Annual Wheat Newsletter 49:         Peterson RF, Campbell AB, Hannah AE. 1948. A diagrammatic scale for estimating rust intensity of leaves and stems of cereals. Canadian Journal of
       48-49.                                                                                                                                                                 Research 60: 496-500.
  Dyck PL, Sykes EE. 1995. The inheritance of stem rust and leaf rust resistance in some Ethiopian wheat collections. Euphytica 81: 291-297.                             Pretorius ZA, Singh RP, Wagoire WW, Payne TS. 2000. Detection of virulence to wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr31 in Puccinia graminis f. sp.
                                                                                                                                                                              tritici in Uganda. Plant Diseases 84:203.
  Haile KJ., Hammer K., Badebo A., Singh RP., Roeder MS. 2012. Haplotype analysis of molecular markers linked to stem rust resistance genes in Ethiopian                 Roelfs AP, Singh RP, Saari EE. 1992. Rust diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexicco, D.F.: CIMMYT. 81 p.
       improved durum wheat varieties and tetraploid landraces. Geneti Resour and Crop Evol. Online Doi.10.1007/s10722-012-9880-0.

More Related Content

More from CIMMYT

The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
CIMMYT
 
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in ThailandOutbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
CIMMYT
 
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
CIMMYT
 
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
CIMMYT
 
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
CIMMYT
 
Maize intensification in major production regions of the world
Maize intensification in major production regions of the worldMaize intensification in major production regions of the world
Maize intensification in major production regions of the world
CIMMYT
 
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
CIMMYT
 
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
CIMMYT
 
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
CIMMYT
 
New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
 New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba... New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
CIMMYT
 
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chickenEffects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
CIMMYT
 
Seeds of Discovery
Seeds of DiscoverySeeds of Discovery
Seeds of Discovery
CIMMYT
 
Soil and nitrogen management in maize
Soil and nitrogen management in maizeSoil and nitrogen management in maize
Soil and nitrogen management in maize
CIMMYT
 
Technologies to drive maize yield improvement
Technologies to drive maize yield improvementTechnologies to drive maize yield improvement
Technologies to drive maize yield improvement
CIMMYT
 
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
CIMMYT
 
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
CIMMYT
 
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer EntrepreneurKanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
CIMMYT
 
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in MaizeIdentification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
CIMMYT
 
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
CIMMYT
 
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in IndiaMolecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
CIMMYT
 

More from CIMMYT (20)

The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
The development of two sweet corn populations resistance to northern corn lea...
 
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in ThailandOutbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
Outbreak of Fusarium ear rot on Maize in Thailand
 
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
Next Generation Phenotyping Technologies in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Toler...
 
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
Marker-assisted introgression of waxy1 gene into elite inbreds for enhancemen...
 
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
Comparative Analysis of Biochemical & Physiological Responses of Maize Genoty...
 
Maize intensification in major production regions of the world
Maize intensification in major production regions of the worldMaize intensification in major production regions of the world
Maize intensification in major production regions of the world
 
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
Genomic and enabling technologies in maize breeding for enhanced genetic gain...
 
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
Defense Response boost Through Cu-chitosan Nanoparticles and Plant Growth enh...
 
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
Institutional and Policy Innovations for Food and Nutrition Security in Asia ...
 
New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
 New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba... New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
New agricultural technologies and gender dynamics at house holds in rural Ba...
 
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chickenEffects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
Effects of QPM and PVA maize on chicken
 
Seeds of Discovery
Seeds of DiscoverySeeds of Discovery
Seeds of Discovery
 
Soil and nitrogen management in maize
Soil and nitrogen management in maizeSoil and nitrogen management in maize
Soil and nitrogen management in maize
 
Technologies to drive maize yield improvement
Technologies to drive maize yield improvementTechnologies to drive maize yield improvement
Technologies to drive maize yield improvement
 
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
Heat Stress Resilient Maize Hybrids for Terai Region of Nepal
 
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
Efficiency of slow/controlled-release fertilizers
 
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer EntrepreneurKanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
Kanwal Singh Chauhan, Farmer Entrepreneur
 
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in MaizeIdentification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
Identification of Candidate Genes for Drought Stress in Maize
 
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
Genetic Mapping of Kernel-Zinc and Iron in Maize
 
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in IndiaMolecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
Molecular Breeding for Development of Biofortified Maize Hybrids in India
 

Valuable sources of resistance to stripe rust in synthetic hexaploid wheat

  • 1. Valuable Sources of Resistance in the Ethiopian durum wheat landraces to Ug99 and other stem rust races Worku Denbel1* and Ayele Badebo2 1 Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box. 489, Asella, Ethiopia 2 Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: workudi@yahoo.com INTRODUCTION Puccinia. graminis f.sp. tritici is one of the debilitating wheat diseases worldwide. For at least two decades, stem rust of wheat was considered to be a disease of minor importance mainly due to the incorporation of Sr31 resistance gene in many of the bread wheat cultivars; however, this gene succumbed to a new stem rust race called Ug99 (TTKSK) (Pretorius et al., 2000). In Ethiopia, two types of wheat (hexaploid, Triticum aestivum L., and tetraploid, T. turgidum L) are cultivated under rain-fed conditions mainly by resource-poor farmers. Durum wheat (T.turgidum subsp. durum Desf.) is the predominating tetraploid, which is an indigenous crop in Ethiopia whereas bread wheat is an introduction, and most of the high yielding semi-dwarf bread wheat varieties are susceptible to Ug99 and other races prevalent in the country. In the absence of resistance in cultivated varieties, new sources of resistance are sought from landraces and related species. Ethiopia is endowed with an immense genetic diversity for tetraploid wheat. All the six species of wheat observed by Vavilov in the mid-1920s are still grown by farmers as landraces (IBC, 2007). The Ethiopian tetraploid landraces have been identified to be potential sources of disease resistance including stripe and stem rust (Betesellassie et al., 2007; Haile et al., 2012). The high level of diversity in these landraces allows breeders and pathologists to make selection for different traits of Table 1. The reaction of selected durum wheat economic importance. Therefore, the major objective of this study was to identify sources of resistance in the Ethiopian landraces to the prevailing stem rust races at Debre durum wheat landraces to Ug99 and other prevailing races of stem rust at Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Zeit in 2009 and 2010 seasons. No. Entries Stem rust severity MATERIALS and METHODS 2009 2010 (main (off-season) A total of 991 durum wheat landraces collected from different areas of Ethiopia (Tigray, Gondar, Gojjam, Wollo, Shewa season) 1. and Kaffa) were used in this study. The collections were made and maintained as single lines by various researchers of 1 WC-1#29 TMR 10MR 1. durum wheat improvement program of Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center. The experiment was conducted in 2009 2 WC-1#32 MRMS 15MSS 1. and 2010 seasons. In 2009 main season, a total of 991 entries were tested whereas in 2010 off-season, 132 landraces 3 WC-1#109 RMR 15MRMS 1. selected from the main season were used. Each entry was planted in two rows of 1m length together with four checks 4 WC-2#7 TR 20MRMS 1. (PBW343, Morocco, Ude and Yerer). PBW343 is carrying Sr31 gene (Brama et al., 2003), Morocco (susceptible check), 5 WC-2#12 TR 20MRMS 1. Ude and Yerer are CIMMYT originated commercail durum wheat varieties in Ethiopia. The nursery was bounded by 6 WC-2#41 TR 20MR 1. spreader rows planted with mixtures of susceptible durum (Arendeto and local red) and bread wheat (PBW343) varieties. 7 WC-2#80 TR 20MSMR 1. The spreader rows were inoculated three times starting from stem elongation with mixtures of TTKSK (Ug99) and other 8 WC-2#98 TR 5MRMS 1. races carrying virulences for stem rust resistance genes including Sr13 using the injection method (Roelfs et al., 1992). 9 WC-2#100 TMR 10MR Figure 1. Frequency (%) of landraces under different leaf 1. 10 WC-3 #15 TMSMR 10MR The rust assessment was made three times using the Modified Cobb’s scale (Peterson et al., 1948). The terminal severity rust resistance categories tested at Debre Zeit, 2009 main 1. 11 TR WC-3 #19 10MRMS 1. was used to categorize the entries into resistant and susceptible groups. The severity was converted to coefficient of season (N= LR, 991) 12 WC-4 #12 TR 20MSMR 1. infection (CI) values by multiplying the severity by constant values (Roelfs et al., 1992). The constant values are: R= 0.2, 13 WC-4 #62 TR 20MSMR 1. MR=0.4, MS=0.8 and S=1. Based on the CI values, the entries were categorized under four resistant groups: The first 14 WC-4 #93 TR 5SMS 1. group included the landraces with 0-10% severity (resistant), the second with severity 15-20% (moderately resistant), and 15 WC - 12 # 40 TR 15MR the third with severity of 25-30% moderately susceptible whereas the rest were considered as susceptible. However, only 1. 16 WC - 12 #66 TMS 15RMR entries which combined leaf and stem rust resistances were advanced to the next stage of evaluation in 2010 off-season. 1. 17 WC -16 #31 TR 10R 1. 18 WC -16 #37 TR 20RMR 1. RESULTS and DISCUSSION 19 WC -16 #57 TR 15MR 1. 20 WC -16 #145 TR 20RMR 1. 21 DW-A- 4 #12 TMR 5RMR In 2009 main season, the leaf rust diseases pressure was quite high, and out of the total entries tested, only 4.8% were 1. 22 DW-A-3 #18 TMR 15MR resistant, 13.2% were moderately resistant, 32.9% were moderately susceptible and the remaining 49.1% were 1. 23 DW-A-3 #20 TR 20RMR completely susceptible to the disease (Figure 1). Leaf rust has been reported to be the most common disease wherever 1. 24 DW-A-3 #70 TR 20MR durum landraces are grown (Huluka and Andnew, 1992). In this study, almost all of the durum wheat landraces 1. 25 DW-A-3 #73 TMR 5MS exhibited susceptible or moderately susceptible reaction to leaf rust; however, they varied in terminal severities. The 1. 26 DW-K-1#57 TR 15MR absence of complete resistance to leaf rust in the landraces is also in agreement with the previous reports (Andenow et 1. 27 DW-K-1#145 TR 20RMR al., 1997; Huluka and Andenow, 1992). In Ethiopia, durum wheat and stem rust have co-evolved for thousands of 1. 28 TMR CD-1-#73 5MS years and this close association has resulted in the accumulation of a wider virulence spectrum on the side of the rust 29 TMR Figure 2. Frequency (%) of landraces under different Yerer 30MRMS (Bechere et al., 1995). The use of durum wheat parents with low level of moderately susceptible or moderately stem rust resistance categories tested at Debre Zeit, 30 5MR Ude 10MS resistant infection types is a valuable and a recommended breeding strategy which has been utilized for durum wheat 2009 main season (N= SR, 991) 31 PBW343 50S 80S improvement in Ethiopia (Bechere et al., 1995) and as a result of such breeding methodology a number of durum wheat varieties have been released by Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center. In 2010 off-season the stem rust pressure was quite high and only 28 landraces were found to be In 2009 main season, stem rust incidence was relatively low and the highest stem rust severity was 50% on susceptible resistant to stem rust. Those entries showed similar or low levels of stem rust reaction when compared varieties. Out of 991 landraces evaluated for stem rust resistance, 79.5% exhibited resistance reaction, 10.6% were with the resistant durum wheat cultivars namely Yerer and Ude (Table 1). Out of these, 20 belong to moderately resistant, 8% were moderately susceptible and the remaining 1.9% was completely susceptible (Figure 2). those collections from Wollo, two from Kaffa, five from Ambo, and one from Chefe Donsa. The stem The low level of stem rust infection was attributed to the susceptibility of many of the landraces to leaf rust which rust disease pressure is often high in the off-seasons when compared to the main seasons even without appeared early in the season. Under such circumstances, it was difficult to select for stem rust resistance under field artificial inoculation at Debre Zeit which might be due to favorable (warmer) temperatures in the off- conditions since the tissue was being killed by leaf rust at early stages. Therefore, only 132 entries which combine season. Probably that was the reason that accounted for the high pressure of stem rust and low stem and leaf rust resistances have been selected for the subsequent test. frequency of stem rust resistant landraces in the 2010 off-season compared to the 2009 main season. In this study, combined resistance to stem and leaf rust diseases have been identified in the 28 Ethiopian durum wheat landraces. In previous reports, the Ethiopian durum landraces have been reported to be excellent sources of stem rust (Bechere et al., 2000) and powdery mildew resistance (Negassa, 1986). Furthermore, the importance of Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces as sources of resistance to wheat stem rust was reported by Betesellassie et al. (2007). This finding is further supported by the work of Dyck and Sykes (1995) as they found combined resistances to stem and leaf rust in the Ethiopian durum landraces. The Ethiopian durum wheat landrace, ST464 carrying Sr7a, Sr9e and Sr13 genes has been utilized as a source of resistance to stem rust in wheat breeding programs of many countries (Knott, 1996; Klindworth et al., 2007). In this study, 28 durum wheat landraces were found to be resistant to leaf and stem rust of wheat with combined virulence for TTKSK and other races with virulence for Sr13 and Sr9e and the leaf rust races prevailing in Debre Zeit. CONCLUSION The result showed that the Ethiopian durum landraces are potential sources of stem rust resistance and they could be exploited in wheat breeding programs. REFERENCES Huluka M., Andenow Y.1992. Variation within indigenous durum wheat germplasm for response to stem and leaf rust races in Ethiopia. In: The 7th Regional Wheat Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Nakuru, Kenya, September 16-19, 1991. CIMMYT. Tanner, D. G. and Andenow Y, Hulluka M, Belay G, Tesemma T. 1997. Resistance and tolerance to leaf rust in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces. Plant Breeding 116: 533-536. Mwangi, W. (eds.). pp. 131-134. Bechere E, Kebede H., and Belay G. 2000. Durum wheat in Ethiopia. An old crop in an ancient land. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Research (IBCR), IBC (Institute of Biodiversity Conservation). 2007. Ethiopia: Country Report on the State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 68 p. FAO. 46p. Bechere E., Tessema T., Huluka M., Andenow Y. 1995. Breeding durum wheat for resistance to leaf and stem rusts in Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of a Regional Klindworth DL., Miller JD, Jin Y, Xu SS. 2007. Chromosomal locations of genes for stem rust resistance in monogenic lines derived from tetraploid Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa. Njoro, Kenya, October 2-6, 1994. Breeding for disease resistance with emphasis on durability. Danial, D. wheat accession ST464. Crop Science 47: 1441-1450. L. (ed.). pp. 125-132. Knott DR. 1996. The transfer of stem rust resistance from the Ethiopian durum wheat St.464 to common wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science Betessilassie N., Fininsa C., Badebo A. 2007. Sources of resistance to stem rust (Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici) in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat accessions. Genetic 76: 317-319. Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 337-343. Negassa M. 1986. Estimates of phenotypic diversity and breeding potential of Ethiopian wheats. Hereditas 104: 41-48. Brama RN, Sivasamy M, Saikia A. 2003. New wheat lines with superior yield components and resistance to stem, leaf, and strip rust. Annual Wheat Newsletter 49: Peterson RF, Campbell AB, Hannah AE. 1948. A diagrammatic scale for estimating rust intensity of leaves and stems of cereals. Canadian Journal of 48-49. Research 60: 496-500. Dyck PL, Sykes EE. 1995. The inheritance of stem rust and leaf rust resistance in some Ethiopian wheat collections. Euphytica 81: 291-297. Pretorius ZA, Singh RP, Wagoire WW, Payne TS. 2000. Detection of virulence to wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr31 in Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in Uganda. Plant Diseases 84:203. Haile KJ., Hammer K., Badebo A., Singh RP., Roeder MS. 2012. Haplotype analysis of molecular markers linked to stem rust resistance genes in Ethiopian Roelfs AP, Singh RP, Saari EE. 1992. Rust diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexicco, D.F.: CIMMYT. 81 p. improved durum wheat varieties and tetraploid landraces. Geneti Resour and Crop Evol. Online Doi.10.1007/s10722-012-9880-0.