Collaborative Digital Collection Management: Briefing on Oregon Digital & the Hydra Project
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•677 views
Briefing for GWLA library directors on Oregon Digital Hydra Project. Presentation by Evviva Weinraub Lajoie and Karen Estlund.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (18)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (16)
Similar to Collaborative Digital Collection Management: Briefing on Oregon Digital & the Hydra Project
Similar to Collaborative Digital Collection Management: Briefing on Oregon Digital & the Hydra Project (20)
More from Karen Estlund
More from Karen Estlund (12)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Collaborative Digital Collection Management: Briefing on Oregon Digital & the Hydra Project
- 1. Collaborative Digital Collection Management: Briefing on Oregon Digital & the Hydra Project GWLA Annual Meeting September 8, 2014 Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie Head, Digital Scholarship Center Director, Emerging Technologies & Services University of Oregon Libraries Oregon State University Libraries & Press Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 2. Who Are We? Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 3. OSU/UO Collaborations Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu Copyright Caryn Medina - http://littletuxedo.wordpress.com/
- 4. Oregon Digital Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 5. DAMS Review Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 6. DAMS Test Environments Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 7. Hydra Hydrozoa (796). Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Image Collection. Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 8. UO Staffing Digital Scholarship Center Programmer (Level 1) UX Design Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu Metadata Librarian Metadata Technician Head / Manager Library Systems Programmer (Level 2) System Administrator
- 9. OSU Staffing Special Collections & Archives Programmer (Level 1) – 50% Emerging Technologies & Services Programmer (Level 3) Programmer (Level 3) Programmer (Level 1) – 50% Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu Digital Applications Librarian – 50% Systems Administrator UX Manager Director Center for Digital Scholarship Digital Applications Librarian – 50% Digital Applications Librarian Metadata Librarian
- 10. Benefits Weighing Hops. Braceros in Oregon Photograph Collection. Oregon State University Libraries & Press. Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 11. Challenges OAC vs. Oregon, November 21, 1908. (UAREF3). University of Oregon Athletics Image Collection. Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
- 12. Future Gray, Don. (1990) Future Lives. Oregon Percent for Art Program. Karen Estlund Evviva Weinraub Lajoie kestlund@uoregon.edu evviva.weinraub@oregonstate.edu
Editor's Notes
- List out our big digital collaborations Oregon Digital (historic) Publishing OJS Oregon Explorer Building Oregon Tribal Archives Institute
- Basic collection policy Items that serve the needs of the citizens of Oregon, and the research & teaching missions of each school Designed to support the digital assets or cultural heritage objects that fall into the collection policy of each respective institution Oregon Digital doesn’t collect ETD’s, research data, pre/post print articles, chapters, grey literature, formal forms of scholarly communication, or GIS data. Basically, if it belongs in a research or data repository, it doesn’t belong in Oregon Digital. Yet. Why we joined forces in the first place (2008) – collaboration & information sharing. Also staff sharing. We fully expect that our collaborations in regards to Hydra will expand to include items like research or data repositories, but we’re currently developing those plans. Etc
- Initially in 2010, then re-engaged in February 2012, E & K got together and presented the idea of exploring options other than ContentDM. Reviewed what was in the field, what met our needs best. Some resistance at the time since neither Islandora or Hydra had huge followings. What were the staffing expectations of each institution This is the piece I think is most important to Faye – WHY we chose Islandora and then WHY we chose Hydra. What did it offer us.
- Islandora Test failed. Also failed at the Alliance though for a different reason. Tom came back from a conference and said, Hydra is ready for prime time. So we pursued a test of Hydra. Spent 6 months building the prototype. Showed it, all parties were in support. Moved forward with full development.
- 12 months of further development Went fully live September 1 What’s changed in our development environments to support this How that’s important moving forward