Essay On Science And Religion

Essay on Science and Religion
Humans do not engage the world in a neutral way. Instead, we see world through the reality that our culture creates. Without culture, humanity would
have to continuously reinvent the wheel, perhaps even literally. It casts a web of reality over us that is inescapable. We are constantly in the grip of our
culture. Therefore, it isn't surprising to find societies with cultures which differ greatly from ours who come to very different conclusions about what
reality is. When we are confronted with these differences in world views, we are often quick and confident to assert that our way of life is superior to
others. This is behavior isn't unique to tribes indigenous to foreign lands who believe in so–called "primitive" religions. It...show more content...
Every part of it depends upon the existence of witchcraft, just as their absolute belief in witchcraft depends upon the rest of their cultural framework.
There is a system of self–reinforcement, which causes the belief to go unquestioned, even when the effects are inconsistent with an objective reality.
Evans–Pritchard explains, "Azande do not perceive the contradiction as we perceive it because they have no theoretical interest in the subject, and those
situations in which they express their beliefs in witchcraft do not force the problem upon them."(Evans–Pritchard, 25) Even if one is able to point out
the inconsistent effects of witchcraft, the Azande will not believe it, but in fact will find a way to incorporate inconsistencies into his worldview,
Evans–Pritchard tells us. However, he also points out that, "they did not attempt to account for the existence of phenomena, or even the action of
phenomena, by mystical causation alone"(Evans–Pritchard, 67) and that "They reason excellently within the idiom of their
beliefs"(Evans–Pritchard,XX), and thus are not mentally inferior or irrational. They merely engage the world through a different idiom than the
Westerner. However, if the Azande are blinded by their beliefs in witchcraft, we cannot be sure that we are free from the same sort of cultural blinders.
Just as the Azande are at the mercy of witches, oracles, and sorcerers,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Science and Religion Essays
Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature
controls how the universe works and religion is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I believe
that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way
around and that religion and science are completely different. It also tells on how many scientists are religious and may be inspired be many religious
ideals but on the other side is that if God created the universe he also created the rules that go with it....show more content...
I'm my opinion since God is the creator of the universe and all life then he is the creator of science as well. There are four other models that
explain the relationship between science and religion but in my opinion they do not explain the relationship between the two. Independence tells
how the two are complete opposites which is true but it also says that religion seeks to explain experiences of inner life which I don't believe to be
true. Religion does try to explain experiences of inner life but it's much more than just that, religion tries to explain how and why were created, how
God created the world, and what purpose do serve on this earth. Complimentary tells how science and religion benefit each other and that information
from one enriches the other. I don't think this model fits at all because I believe that the two are completely different and do not enrich or fulfill one
another. I believe that in the world there opposites to everything, good and evil, white and black and science and religion. The only way science and
religion compliment the other is to be the opposite of the other.
Integration is the model that tells how science

Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature
controls how the universe works and religion is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I believe
that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way
around and that religion and science are completely different. It also tells on how many scientists are religious and may be inspired be many religious
ideals but on the other side is that if God created the universe he also created the rules that go with it.
I choose the model of conflict because I believe in some of the points it talks about such as how they are at odds because science tells how nature
controls life and religion tells how God does. The point that really sticks out with me is how it's says that if God created the universe then he created
the rules that go with it and I strongly believe in that point. I thinks that this model can show a little about what it means to be faithful in God because
faith is believing in God and the teachings of God, so in having faith in God you believe that he created the universe and its rules.
Most scientists believe in the theory of evolution because it answers the question on how humans came to be and how life as we know it came to be.
In my opinion it does answer the question

Essay Can Science and Religion Co-exist?
Science and theology have diverged lines amongst several of the world's phenomenon with the two greatest differences being human and world
development. Although there are differences in the beliefs of these two groups, they are ultimately attempting to solve the same puzzles that consume
the minds of members of both disciplines. In the end one might say, both disciplines are working to solve two different puzzles that may be really
different, but ultimately are aspects of the same puzzle. Both the method and the aims of science and religion seem to be different. Science is
considered to be more linked to the material aspect of all things, where religion is concerned with the spiritual. These are just two of the differences to
be discussed...show more content...
Religions are based on what myths the members believe to be true. Some examples of these sacred collections are the Bible and Koran. Christians
following the Bible are told, through scripture, that the earth was created by God in six days. The Bible describes how God also created Adam
and Eve who were the beginning of humankind. Being as these creations of God are believed to have occurred over 6,000 years ago and no harden
proof of the creation is available, religious followers utilize the stories of the creations described in scripture as the basis for their beliefs. The
estimate of the creation occurring over 6,000 years ago is determined by theologians using mathematical equations based on statements found in the
bible (Deem, 2006). This brief description of God's creation is the Christian belief of beginning of the world and mankind which is based upon spiritual
concerns which strongly differs from that of the scientific belief. Scientists use the scientific method of research to develop theories. This method of
research begins with a problem or question, then observation and research of the question is conducted. Following this research the scientists creates a
hypothesis, or educated guess, of one definitive answer to the question. The scientist then conducts an experiment where he collects and analyzes

Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science
The human mind is easily convinced on what the eyes tell the mind. If you see something in front of yourself, you might have an easier time
believing, than if one was to tell a story. Religion is a story that has been told for thousands of years, and not till technology has ripened have scientists
disproved many beliefs. It is now that mankind lets religion restrain the mind from portraying the truth about life. Some people claim that science
does not have all of the answers when it comes to the business of life. They are right. Science is less a body of "facts" than it is is a method of
establishing claims about the universe. Claims, which can be tested and measured, reviewed and evaluated....show more content...
population"(n.y.times4/12/88), believes that these supernatural people exist, running errands for God, or helping people in time of need. This whole
belief system is a throwback to earlier times in human history, when the world was enchanted, populated with mystical and religious entities of all
sorts (Greek Gods for example). Its existence today is a shadow land of beliefs, which co–exist with our more enlightened views about the universe.
For most people, their view of the world rests with one foot in consciousness and the other ignorance. One of the more curious artifacts of supernatural
belief is so–called Scientific Creationism. A quest to balance the mind's interpretations of the Judeo–Christian Bible with the findings of modern
science. Decades after the famous "Monkey trial" which debated the pros and cons of evolutionary discovery, we are still repeating this argument in the
nation's public schools. The evolution on–creation debate which now rages in the United States, and elsewhere is tied to other issues. This includes
prayer in schools, and indeed the role of religious instruction in the classroom and other civic institutions. It is also a highly charged, emotional
debate. Creationists see evolution as part of a larger agenda aimed at religious belief itself. In a peculiar way, they may well be correct. But as with
any debate, we should weigh the evidence and examine these raw facts as

Science And Religion Research Paper
Today, it seems like science and religion are in a constant, bloody war with one another, similarly to the on–going war between the Palestinians and the
Jews, but what are science and religion? Science is the intellectual study of the structure and behavior of the world through observation and experiment.
Religion is the belief in a superior being or many superior beings. Although science and religion seem like two diverse topics, the two methods of
explanation are more alike than one would think, and both of these things together complement each other to give us our modern technology and how
we as a society should use it. First, to explain how science and religion are similar, we have to look back in time. Throughout our history and deep in
...show more content...
Without the contribution our religion institution provided us, we could still be stuck in a dark time with a lack of advances in technological. The
catholic church was the first place to allowed the common folk (peasants) the luxury of books and education. Before the Catholic Church opened the
opportunity of education and books to the masses, education and books were strictly for the wealthy. With the education provided by the catholic
church, the people started to question things in their environment. They also started pursuing answers to their questions away from text. People held
experiments and would document it carefully. An example of a person who did document his findings is Roger Bacon. It was the curiosity of the
common folk and the opportunity the Catholic Church gave the common folk that helped to re–birth science in Europe. This action made by the
catholic church changed the course of history, which gave European empires an opportunity to compete among the hegemonic powers at the time
(the Abbasid Empire), and brought Europe out of the gloomy Medieval Era and into the beautiful Renaissance Era. To this day, the Catholic Church
remains one of the main contributors to educating the youth of the world and as a result, has a huge emphasis on science and technology. The
second clue to how these three big topics are closely related is in the nature of science. Science is our explanation of the world backed up with
experimentation and hard fact. Us taking the knowledge of the world and creating a new method or device to make life easier is how we obtain

To react to the first assignment, all the quotes mentioned in the earlier assignment still sustain, but one more quote from Einstein is added. Because my
personal philosophy of science still believes that science and religion go together (Quote #1 to 3). Human beings obtain wisdom and abilities from
religion to understand the phenomena through science application to investigate the phenomena. While religion can cultivate a human beings' sense of
morality and humanity, it can also guide scientists when they conduct research that runs the risk of going beyond humane standards. However, after a
semester, different views of religion are included in the current personal philosophy of science. At the beginning, religion was seen in a very...show
more content...
He also indicated research questions as guidance in literature search, data collection, data analysis, and discussion. In other words, research questions
keep scientists emphasize their studies, so they do not go off in unnecessary directions (Bryman, 2012). Similarly, research plans are also essential to
scientists because they might have limited resources, such as time, human labor, locations, or funding (Bryman, 2012). With a research plan, scientists
can understand the process of their research and how many resources can be distributed to each research phase. Therefore, these two quotes are staying
in the list because they remind scientists the most important elements of research.
The goals Four personal goals were stated in the first assignment but not all of them sustain after this semester. The first three goals are to think
outside of the discipline, to critique a research design, and to understand threats to validity. My ability to accomplish these goals might still be at the
elementary level, but in compare to at the beginning of the semester, I feel more comfortable to understand criminology from a different view.
Moreover, after a semester lecture on research design and threats to validity, although I might be able to crudely apply the knowledge in critiquing
research articles, with more practice in the future, I hope to smoothly

Religion and Science: Can They Coexist in the Modern World
Since the dawn of man, humans have struggled to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify their existence in it. Throughout this
journey of self–understanding, numerous standpoints about human existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called
religion. Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious
ideology. The new, scientifically–grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age–old questions, which are
antithetical to the explanations offered by some religious beliefs. The Bible has answered the questions: how...show more content...
Many religious thinkers have responded to this evidence, by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earth's age are inaccurate. They argue that
radioactive dating; a widely accepted method of determining the age of rocks, is inaccurate because there is no available rock sample of a known
age, to which the method can be calibrated. However, this argument is obsolete because the only calibration required to find the age of a rock is the
measurement of decay rates, which can be found in the laboratory in a controlled experiment (Badash, 1995, 90). Because of the evidence provided by
scientific research, many religious thinkers have been forced to compromise their position, and have attempted to blend scientific fact with biblical
accounts of the age of the earth.
Many theists contend that the words of the Bible are metaphorical, and can be interpreted in a way that reconciles the biblical account of the Earth's
age with scientific fact. According to Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, the earth was created in six days: "And God saw every thing that
he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day" (Genesis 1:31). They argue that other passages in
the book of Genesis can be interpreted to mean that a day to God can be thousands of years, and because of this, the Earth could have been created
over a much longer timeframe than six days, and can thus be as

The Relations between Science and Religion Essay
The relations between science and religion.
Humans are servant of God who descended to earth as its inhabitants. Humans are creatures of God are given the advantage of reasonable than other
creatures. With that human minds can do more than any other creature.
At the beginning of its creation, only human beings who do not know anything and therefore people need a hint for his life. Humans need a guideline
in order to survive life in the world and in the hereafter. Guideline for humans is religion. Religion is a hint of life, encompasses all aspects of human
beings, including science. So many recent scientific discoveries in modern times was already confirmed.
With scientific evidence in accordance with the scriptures, it can be...show more content...
So ilmuadalah knowledge that meet specific characteristics and terms are standardized into a "science ", the two terms are combined into one word.
Can be formulated also that science is as common knowledge ilmiahdan merged into science directly.
The application of science in the world modeern has produced many technologies that make people's lives healthier, more comfortable, and more
secure. While the science is also one way to seek the truth, which is the objective truth. Even so, science tends to be autonomous so therefore he is
often seen as the only path to truth.
As a result we often face a clash between science and religion in the field of theology. The problem is, science is actually just talking about the
objective reality of nature and humans. When in fact the religion talk about a whole person, body and soul are, and the broadest nature, ie the real
nature and the supernatural, as well as kenyataam entirely, namely nature and god of creation. So in fact there is the intersection between the two, yait
on nature and human problems. There is no contradiction between the two.
But in the course of history several centuries after reinaisans, scientific revolution, followed by the industrial revolution, our scientific knowledge about
ourselves and our natural environment has changed dramatically. Unfortunately the new picture for a lot of people tend to negate the description given
by the theology of world

Relationship Between Science And Religion
Science is the study of the natural and physical world through experiments and observations.
Religion, however, makes analytical arguments and shares transcendental beliefs that have been passed on from believers to converts. Religion
acknowledges philosophical explanations; it includes faith and revelation, whereas, science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence, whereas.
The relationship offers a continued debate in both philosophy and theology. This paper will explore the different religious perspectives on science,
and scientific perspectives on topics of a variety of religious groups. This paper will provide general exploration of the relationship between science, and
religion. This paper, along with their oppositions, will include an explanation on how science and religion can strengthen each other to allow a more
nuanced experience of our world and our place in it.
Science and religion and their differences Science and religion are the two most important worldviews. They are global phenomena present throughout
the history of mankind. Science and religion are extremely complex enterprises. Both are in a state of constant change. The birth of modern science
itself cannot be understood without previous scientific developments. Going back to the dawn of science in antiquity, we can already find interactions
with religion. Science is the study of the natural and physical world through experiments and observations; it's about explanation. Religion is about

Research Paper On Science And Religion
Science and Religion
When you think of science and religion you automatically think that they are the polar opposite of one another, and while yes they do tend to have
conflicting sides to them, they actually have some things in common. This goes without saying that they do have varying ideas on certain topics which
will be discussed. Of the plethora of different topics, we will be discussing the views of science and religion on, homosexuals, evolution, afterlife, and
purpose. Not only will we be talking about those topics, we will also discuss the variety of conflicting views of different religions. Many of these
topics are controversial and many religions will have different views, some may be violent, some peaceful, whilst others may be indifferent.
Regardless of the position that everyone takes we all just want to understand or feel like we understand the universe and why we are here. We will
start off with science, science in many cases is stoic and homosexuality is not an exception, but regardless of the stoicism, the fact is you see it in
nature, in a book published by Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist from the University of Harvard, Gottingen, and Cambridge, he states "about 10% of
rams (male) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams" (LeVay, 2010, pg 70–71). The next topic for examination is
Evolution, or as some creationists may say the "theory of evolution", and yes it is a theory, but in science when something is a theory it is the

Evidence Based Science Vs Religion
The opposite of science is commonly regarded to as religion. Scientific discoveries have been challenging the established religions throughout history
and have played a severe role in science's influence in multiple generations. For example, during Copernicus's time, society was amidst an era of
reformation and rebellion where catholic authority was being questioned, especially with important figures such as Martin Luther and astronomers such
as Copernicus having such a power voice to society. the famous astronomer, Galileo, was shunned by the Catholic church for endorsing the theory that
the earth revolved around the sun. Centuries later, Charles Darwin's ideas of evolution clashed with the ideas of the majority of religious people. This
lead to the...show more content...
Today's establishment consists of many religions, and depending on one's location in the world depends on which religion is majority. In a country such
as America, the first amendment protects the rights for any person to practice their religion freely but this does not prevent out–lash from both sides of
the arguments. In outside countries however, religion has been ruled by extremists that deny any education that promotes non–religion based science.
Scientists continue to provide research, develop new theories, and collect evidence regardless of the out–lash received.
Outside of religious governmental power and laws, the closest belief–based science to evidence–based science is pseudoscience. Many individuals rely
on the healing power of the horoscopes and zodiac signs for meditative and trans–formative uses. Though the pseudoscience such as astrology has the
title of 'science', it is discouraged from being a science because of it's belief–based system that relies on emotional appeal rather than tested

Science And Religion
Are science and religion related? If so, how are they related? What is the importance of them in human lives? I believe, science and religion are
related to each other. The relationship between them has been debated for several years. Science is linked to the material, while religion is worried
about spirituality (Vikas, 2012). Humans depend on both religion and science not one or the other. In spite of being different from each other, science
and religion are related and linked to each other.
Science is based on observations, experiments, verifications, poofs, and facts while religion is based on the rituals and faith. Both use different ways to
explain and understand the world and what humans represent in the world. On one hand, there...show more content...
For example, most of us describe God as all–knowing and everywhere present. What if there was a finite probability that God could do these stuff and
it is not impossible. What if there is a possibility that God does not break boundaries of science but actually stays within in them. If science tells us
that there is a probability for the unusual activity happening and we are okay with that then we should not be as surprised about god that he can do
such things (Cruz, 2017). However, there is still a probability for that. This example shows that based on the probability, God's such act could be a
possibility. This shows how can these two things could be linked to together to explain phenomena like probability.
In Christian biblical texts, it talks about God created the world out of nothing, God is separate from the world, God created world freely, and many
other things. But, there is nowhere in their literature of Christian religion talks about the age of the earth or specifies a mode of creation. This allows
diverse views within science and religion. Therefore, in the Big Band theory proposed by Geroges LemaГ®tre, seems to give an answer. Based on the
theory, "universe originated from an extremely hot and dense state around 13.8 billion years ago" (Cruz, 2017). This shows that having known the
world was created, lead science to find out how long ago was earth created.
Science

Science and Religion Essay
Science and religion have always collided. Science is based on observation and what we can prove. Religion on the other hand makes arguments
analytical in nature and requires faith. The basis though may not seem similar. A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy,
which is transmitted in the world we live in. Religions like to look this ultimate reality as God. This entity is capable of setting an order in the universe
and is nothing but what religion defines as God. Science and Religion then appear to be tied up like two versions of the same subject.
What major affects does science have on religion in the past two centuries? From Isaac Newton, who discovered gravity, Thomas Edison who invented
to light...show more content...
All these affect religion and who believes it and to what extent we as people actually believe. In today's society people want to be able to grasp, to
hold it, and even just feel it. So how do some people believe in God, we are not able to see him, hold him, let alone hear him? So how can we
actually believe in something that is not there? Now you see this is how science draws us away from our beliefs. Science says that, "seeing is
believing." Meaning that if u can see something then you can believe in it. We are not able to see him. But his existence could be debated using
knowledge based on what we see around us. For instance when we throw coins on a table, these coins will stop and arrange themselves on the table.
What made the coins be in the order we see them after they have been thrown? Maybe it was the cause of Newton's Laws. But then again this order as
proposed by Science implies an order setter. Is this God, a human like, yet unseen being? Are his features well defined? How do we describe the
qualities of such a being? If He is perfect, his features are the highest level of moral standards, then we can say that him and is followers are beyond
our understanding. We might say that he is wise, he knows all, and he is merciful and powerful. But these just limits how we express things not
described by our won language. It is possible we might not have

The relationship between science and religion has been debated for many years. With strong personal opinions and beliefs, it is not surprising that
no progress has been made in this argument. In my opinion, I feel as though religion and science have to be related in some way. There is no
possible way people can separate two things that attempt to prove the same facts. My belief is that a metaphorical bridge has to be formed to connect
the two. Personally, I feel as though science can be a compliment to religion, and that the scientific discoveries can and should be used to prove that God
exists, not disprove it. If science did this, then the relationship between science and religion could be a friendly one. If that...show more content...
This observation by Nancy Murphy and her colleagues was published in 1993, and has been used in the debate over science and religion ever since.
People have stated the observations made by the astronomers imply that the belief in God as the designer and creator of the universe is a completely
valid statement. It has even been said that science has even proven where everything comes from, and science proves that through the Holy Trinity.
Parker Johnstone wrote how God's power is common to everything in the universe and how, in the Holy Trinity, God is the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit. He writes how the only element common to every father, son, and spirit is the energy that is established both tangibly and intangibly in
positive–negative forces. These forces are what scientists use to describe every object in existence. So that means if God really is the Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit that symbolizes life forever, then, based on scientific principles, God will continue to make combinations and objects forever. That
shows where everything comes from. The previous paragraph proved that science and religion have to be related in some way, and, whether you agree
or disagree with the statements and implications above, that science is able to prove religion. People can disagree with the

Argument Between Science and Religion Essay
Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument
between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual
questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed
Charles Darwin as a paragon of evolution, found evidence and answers to argue that evolution is the more reasonable theory in the question of: Where
did everything come from? This paper focuses on a traditional Creationist theory as described in the Genesis story of creation in the Hebrew Bible.
Evolution is the...show more content...
But then the next question is: Where did god come from? If that gets considered as an unanswerable question, then save a step and say the origins of
the universe are an unanswered question. Creationist also argue, that god always existed, why not save a step again and consider that the universe
always existed, but then there wouldn't be a need for a creation, it was always there. These are not easy questions. In an evolutionist eyes though, the
universe did not always existed, but was the consequence of an unusual event. The Big Bang.
How could life begin without intelligent interference?
It is possible that through a chemical process life can begin without intelligent interference.
To answer this question requires looking at the primordial earth as it was over 1.7 billion years ago: warm, mostly wet, and with an atmosphere of
different gases like hydrogen, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide. DNA is a chain of just four different types of nuclear tights. Under the condition of
the primordial earth those nuclear tights can form on they own. After they formed the next step is to join together. Researches found that the clay
in the primordial earth was in perfect condition for them to join and so they did. The result was RNA. RNA is able to make copies of itself. The
copies are not always perfect there are mistakes. The ones that are copied better are stronger and survive. And so over 1.000 years RNA grew more
complex to DNA. DNA needs

Research Paper On Science Vs Religion
Science versus Religion: How the universe came to be
Humanity has always struggled with the controversy of how the universe was created, since it is a question without a definite answer. People tend to
look to science and religion to solve this problem. Christianity is the most followed religion, and evolution is the most popular scientific belief.
Christians claim there is a greater being (God), who created the universe.
Evolutionists, on the other hand, claim the earth and humanity came to be through the big bang. The creation debate tends to focus on evolution and
Christianity. Through gapcreationism, evolutionary creationism, and old earth creationism, theologians and scientists are in the process of fusing
scientific creation and religion. Theologians are using old earth creationism, evolutionary creationism, and gap...show more content...
Public schools are only allowed to teach evolution, while private schools tend to only teach Christianity. Studies show when both views, Intelligent
design theory and Evolution, are taught there tends to be more people who accept both sides. The reason why the public schooling system came to
not being able to speak about Christianity is because parents and students claimed it dissuaded and offended their religion. I think this is not fair to
the majority of children, who are not offended by hearing more views on creation. People who are only taught Evolution actually tend to be less
likely to believe in evolution then if they are taught multiple religions. A reason why this is also not taught in school is because science is always
changing with new technology, and obtaining new information about the world. This is a problem because religion is never changing, or at least the
basic principles of religion do not change. The basic principles of science can change, and do change. There does not seem to be a place where both,
Christianity and Evolution, can be taught without

Religion vs. Science Essay
Religion vs. Science
This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I
also have faith. Scientific research has lead to dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and physical
injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all–time high. Majority of Americans have said they trust the scientific community more than almost
anyone, including the Supreme Court, organized religion, Congress, teachers and the U.S. military. Many of these Americans believe that these
scientific advances are leading them to a better world. The questions: What is man? What am I to do?...show more content...
Raymo viewed humans as the universe becoming conscious of itself through evolution, while prayer consists of miracles, and giving praise and
thanksgiving to nature. (National Review p32) Scientists begin to worship their own concepts, proclaiming limitless philosophical systems rather than
concentrating on what the data is really showing. Scientists cannot prove that known natural forces can produce complex biological organisms. No one
has demonstrated that chemical evolution cannot even begin to account for the information content of the simplest organisms. There is no actual
evidence of natural selection having substantial creative power. The only examples available are those of variations in fundamentally stable
populations. In scientific perspective, molecular revolution has revealed an unforeseen domain of complexity and interaction more consistent with
technology than with the mechanical viewpoint. Scientist have come to realize that cells thoroughly protect themselves against the kinds of accidental
genetic change that, according to conventional theory, are the sources of evolutionary variability. The current knowledge of genetic change is
fundamentally at variance with hypothesis held by neo–Darwinists. Everyone is in search of the their truth. Understanding, the very rich and varied
world, in which we live, the need for these insights of

Relationship Between Science And Religion Essay
An Essay on Science and Religion
There can be hardly any compromise between science and religion. Science deals with the material world that we know religion is concerned with a
divine order that we imagine. Science believes in things that can be proved; religion deals with ideas that cannot be proved. Science depends on reason;
religion on intuition. The scientist bases himself on material facts; religion takes its stand on spiritual ideas. The scientist works in the laboratory of
the material world; the religious teacher probes into the recesses of the inward mind. The goal of science is achievement; that of religion is
realization. The truths of science can be proved to all; the so–called truths of religion have to be taken on trust. Hence there is bound to be hostility
between the man of science and the man of religion.
Whether God exists is a proposition that is beyond proof. Writing in an age when science was already beginning to work havoc with man's traditional
ideas, Tennyson plaintively said of God–
Whom we that cannot see Thy faces,
By faith and faith and faith alone embrace,
Believing where we cannot prove.
And again–
We have but faith, we cannot know,
Fol. knowledge is of things we see;
And yet we trust it comes from Thee
A beam in darkness.
Here we have in poetic language the essence of the perplexity with which we in the modern age are confronted, when dealing with the ideas of
God and religion. We have to accept these ideas on trust because they are incapable of proof. Beyond the known world of life that is before us,
there is the illimitable unknown world beyond death which we neither know nor can know, and yet which looms before us as something so
portentous that we cannot ignore Religion therefore, is the refuge of man where science has failed to solve his doubts. And as long as this limitation
on our powers of knowing will remain, there is bound to be a place for religion in human life.
But a claim is being made on behalf of religion chiefly in India–that it has its own science; that it does know that which is unknown to our senses by a
sort of sixth sense. That is the claim made by the mystic and the yogi. According to them just as the scientist knows reality with the help of

Essay On Science And Religion

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Essay On Science And Religion