The document discusses errors and mistakes in language learning. It defines the differences between errors and mistakes, with mistakes being performance errors where the learner knows the correct system but makes a slip, and errors reflecting the learner's current competence where their internalized system is incorrect. The document also discusses sources of errors such as interlingual transfer from the native language and intralingual errors within the target language. It notes the importance of balancing feedback on errors with positive reinforcement to avoid demotivating learners.

1. 1. Errors and Mistakes
2. Statements about feedback The fact that the teacher gives feedback on student performance
implies a power hierarchy: the teacher above, the student below. Very much agree Totally disagree
Assessment is potentially humiliating to the assessed person. Very much agree Totally disagree
Teachers should give only positive feedback, in order to encourage, raise confidence and promote
feelings of success; negative feedback demoralises. Very much agree Totally disagree
3. Statements about feedback Giving plenty of praise and encouragement is important for the
fostering of good teacher-student relationships Very much agree Totally disagree Very frequent
approval and praise lose their encouraging effect; and lack of praise may then be interpreted as
negative feedback Very much agree Totally disagree Correcting each other can be harmful to
student relationships Very much agree Totally disagree
4. Mistakes and Errors Intralingual (within one language) errors Interlingual (across two or more
languages) errors ” A learner’s errors…are significant in (that) they provide to the researcher
evidence of how language is learned or acquired, what strategies or procedures the learner is
employing in the discovery of the language.” (Corder, 1967)
5. Mistakes and Errors A mistake refers to a performance error that is either a random guess or a
“slip,” in that it is a failure to utilise a known system correctly. An error , a noticeable deviation from
the adult grammar of a native speaker, reflects the competence of the learner. Mistakes are what
researchers have referred to as performance errors (the learner knows the system but fails to use it)
while the errors are a result of one’s systematic competence (the learner’s system is incorrect).
6. Mistakes and Errors Think about to what extent your learning or teaching has been characterised
by a progression of noticing and repair? Can you think of stages when you were in the process of
cleaning up your errors and may have made a few random mistakes? What do you do?
7. What’s the difference? An error cannot be self-corrected, according to James (1998), while
mistakes can be self-corrected if the deviation is pointed out to the speaker.
8. Error Analysis Learners from disparate language backgrounds tend to make similar errors in
learning one target language. Interlingual errors of interference from the native language Intralingual
errors within the target language The sociolinguistic context of communication Pyscholinguistic or
cognitive strategies Affective variables
9. Too much attention to error We must be aware of placing too much attention on errors and not
lose sight of the value of positive reinforcement or clearly expressed language that is a product of
the learner’s progress and development. The comprehension of language is as important as the
production . Language is speaking and listening, writing and reading. The absence of the error does
not necessarily reflect native-like competence because learners may be avoiding the very structures
that pose difficulty for them. We need to engage in performance analysis or inter-language analysis,
a less restrictive concept that places a healthy investigation or errors within the larger perspective of
the learner’s total language performance.
10. Sources of Error TABLE 9,1 PG 265 BROWN Interlingual Transfer Intralingual Transfer Context
of Learning Communication Strategies

2. 11. Identifying and Describing Errors “ Does John can Sing?” A. no B. Yes D. Can John sing? E.
Original sentence contained pre-posed do auxiliary applicable to most verbs, but not to verbs with
modal auxiliaries OUT2
12. Identifying and Describing Errors “ I saw their department” YES NO (Context was a conversation
about living quarters in Mexico) NO F. YES. Spanish G. YO vi su departamento. YES H. I saw their
apartment E. Departamento was translated to false congate department. OUT2
13. But…what can I do more quickly? Generalised errors: addition, omission, substitution and/or
ordering Levels of language need to be considered: phonology, orthography, lexicon, grammar and
discourse Global errors hinder communication: ; they prevent the hearer from comprehending
some/all aspect of the message. Local errors do not prevent the message from being heard, usually
because there is only a minor violation on one segment of a sentence, allowing the hearer/reader to
make an accurate guess about the intended meaning.
14. Stages of learner language development Random Errors – pre-systematic stage Emergent
Stage Systematic Stage Postsystematic or stabilisation stage
15. References Brown, 273- 280 Errors in the Classroom Celce-Murcia and Hawkins, 1985,
Contrastive analysis, error analysis and interlanguage analysis. Beyond basics: Issues and
research in TESOL (44-66) Rowley, MA: Newbury House Gass (1989) James (1998) Errors in
language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Corder
(1967), The significance of learners’ errors. International review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170
Corder (1971) Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International review of Applied Linguistics, 9,
147-159 Panova I and Lyster R(2002), Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL
classroom, TESOL Quarterly, 36 – 573-595