2. Clinical case
History goes back to 12 years prior to presentation, when the
patient started complaining from regurgitation, and mild
dysphagia
The patient has consulted a gastrologist, and a gastroscopy
was done
11. Clinical case
Syptoms begun to worsen since 4 years, with added frequent
vomiting and regurgitation of undigested foods, with dysphagia
to both solids and liquids, assiciated with marked weight loss
(about 10 kg in the last few years).
A gastroscopy was repeated in 2017, and general surgeon
consulted.
13. What is an esophageal diverticulum?
An esophageal diverticulum is a pouch that protrudes outward
in a weak portion of the esophageal lining.
This pocket-like structure can appear anywhere in the
esophageal lining between the throat and stomach.
15. Congenital vs Acquired
Congenital diverticula are diverticula that are present at birth,
while acquired diverticula develop later in life.
Diverticula of the esophageal body can sometimes be difficult
to classify as congenital or acquired
16. True vs False
True diverticula
False diverticula(pseudodiverticula)
A special type of pseudodiverticula, believed to represent
dilated excretory ducts of esophageal submucosal glands, is
observed in the condition esophageal intramural
pseudodiverticulosis.
24. What are the symptoms of esophageal
diverticula?
The symptoms of esophageal diverticula include:
Dysphagia
Pulmonary aspiration (the entry of secretions or foreign material into the trachea and
lungs)
Aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection caused by pulmonary aspiration)
Regurgitation of swallowed food and saliva
Pain when swallowing
Cough
Neck pain
Weight loss
Bad breath (halitosis)
Some people may experience a gurgling sound as air passes through the diverticulum.
This is known as Boyce's sign.
26. Clinical case
On physical examination, the patient looks well, thin.
Vitals within normal range
Abdomen was not distended, with positive bowel sounds, soft,
non tender
32. Clinical case
The patient on pre-op examination, he had dyspnea,
transferred to ER.
A CT chest was ordered for a suspected Pulmonary Embolism.
The patient had aspiration pneumonia
40. After the esophagogastric junction was indentified, the
operation started with mobilization of the abdominal
esophagus from the diaphragmatic pillars and dissection of the
diaphragmatic cruses.
41. Once a wide retroesophageal space was created, gentle
traction was applied to the esophagus using a retractor.
The gastroesophageal junction was then encircled with
umbilical tape to aid with traction during the mediastinal
dissection.
Then, epiphrenic diverticulum of the esophagus was mobilized
from the mediastinum about 7 cm above the diaphragmatic
cruses
42. After preparation of the diverticular pouch was completed, the
4 cm long diverticulum neck was sewn with the endoscopic
linear surgical stapler Echelon FLEX 60 under intraoperative
esophagogastroscopic control
Endoscopy is repeated to check for the adequacy of the
myotomy and ruling our mucosal injury.
43. The resected diverticulum was inserted in a retrieval bag.
No evidence of esophageal stricture was observed, and the
operation continued with esophageal myotomy 5 cm above
and 3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction.
After myotomy was performed, a test with gas showed no
leaks from the staple line. The procedure was completed with
Dor fundoplication.
Ethibond 3/0 interrupted stitches were used.
44. The bottom of the anterior stomach wall was sewn to the
myotomy edges with Ethibond 2/0 interrupted stitches from
both sides. To close the diaphragmatic lesion the upper
stitches
The patient tolerated the surgery well. The overall operative
time was 180 min.
45. On the first postoperative day an esophagogram with
Gastrografin swallow (Photo 6) and chest X-ray was
performed. It excluded any defects of suture line integrity and
pneumothorax.
The patient had no complaints of dysphagia or vomiting.
46.
47.
48. Pathology
The results of histological analysis showed a 7.5 cm × 6 cm
esophageal diverticulum with 0.3 cm thickness of the wall.
It was covered with stratified squamous cell epithelium, had
some focal erosions, and was infiltrated with monomorphic
leukocytes. Partial or total atrophy of the muscular layer of the
diverticulum was observed.
49. A liquid diet was prescribed for 3 days; it was tolerated without
any pain, regurgitation or dysphagia.
On the 4 day after surgery the patient was discharged from
hospital in a good state of health with recommendations for a
soft diet for 5 days.
50. From the 10 postoperative day the patient resumed a regular
diet.
Four weeks after the operation the patient had no complaints,
symptoms of dysphagia or vomiting.
52. DEFINITION
Distal 10 cm of the esophagus
20% of all esophageal diverticulum
FALSE
PULSION
53. DEFINITION
The underlying pathophysiologic mechanism is a result of increased
intraluminal pressure, presumably secondary to an esophageal
motility disorder :
Achalasia
Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter
Distal peptic ulcer
Prior fundoplication
Any of these processes may lead to herniation of the mucosa and
submucosa through an area of weakness in the muscle layers of the
esophagus.
55. PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL
FINDINGS
symptomatic in only 15% to 20% of cases.
Typical symptoms include :
Dysphagia
regurgitation.
Reflux
chest pain
Pulmonary symptoms
Malodorous breath
56. PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL
FINDINGS
On history, it is important to elicit whether the patient
experiences symptoms of GE reflux disease, regurgitation,
chest pain, or dysphagia.
Additional medical history such as recurrent pneumonia, lung
abscesses, or repeated aspiration episodes is pertinent.
A history of weight loss is not uncommon.
Prior procedures such as esophageal dilations or botulinum
toxin injection are also pertinent.
57. How is esophageal diverticulum diagnosed?
Barium swallow
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Esophageal manometry
24-h pHmetry
Epiphrenic diverticula are associated with an underlying esophageal
motility disorder in most cases.
It is imperative to not only assess the size and location of the
diverticulum but also to characterize the motor function of the
esophagus.
58. Imaging Studies
Barium radiography (ie, barium esophagography, barium
swallow) generally is the diagnostic procedure of choice.
61. High resolution manometry
High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a variant of the
conventional manometry in which multiple recording sites are
used, thus creating a “map” of the esophageal contractions.
This technology allows detection of segmental peristaltic
defects, detecting motor defects in a higher number of patients
with epiphrenic diverticula.
63. Nonsurgical treatment
Mild esophageal diverticula can usually be managed through
lifestyle changes, such as:
thoroughly chewing your food
eating a bland diet
drinking lots of water after you eat to help with digestion.
Antacids
65. Medication
Botulinum toxin has been used successfully as an alternative to surgical myotomy or
pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia.
OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®)
Botulinum toxin type A is produced by Clostridium botulinum and is responsible for
botulism in humans. Botulinum toxin type A produces denervation of affected muscle
tissue by irreversibly binding to presynaptic nerve endings and inhibiting the release of
acetylcholine.
When endoscopically injected into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), interference
with cholinergic transmission of the myenteric plexus leads to smooth muscle relaxation
with a subsequent fall of the LES resting pressure.
This drug has been used in other fields of medicine to treat spastic torticollis and
blepharospasm.
66. In many patients with mid esophageal and epiphrenic
diverticula, dysphagia is related to underlying dysmotility; thus,
treatment should be directed to the motility disorder when
feasible.
For instance, achalasia can be treated with pneumatic dilation,
botulinum toxin injection into the lower esophageal sphincter,
or surgical Heller esophagomyotomy.
67. Endoscopic treatment of an epiphrenic
diverticulum using a fully covered self-expanding
metal stent
68.
69. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
The need for surgical resection of epiphrenic diverticula largely
depends on the patient’s symptoms.
Small, asymptomatic diverticula (less than 3 cm) often do not
require intervention.
Symptomatic patients with small diverticula may benefit from
myotomy (with concomitant partial fundoplication) to correct
the underlying motility disorder.
Larger diverticula require diverticulectomy in addition to
myotomy (with concomitant partial fundoplication).
70. OPEN THORACIC APPROACH
The operative steps for an open transthoracic epiphrenic
diverticulum resection are similar to those described earlier for the
minimally invasive approach. A
7th interspace thoracotomy is used. An open left thoracic approach
is ideal when a fundoplication is to be performed from the chest
(Belsey Mark IV). Use of
a thoracoabdominal (TA) stapler or resection and hand-sewn closure
of the mucosa are commonly used techniques for resection of the
diverticulum when an
open approach is used.
Editor's Notes
Esophageal diverticula are classified by location in the esophagus.
Diverticula also may be classified on the basis of histopathology.
True diverticula contain all layers of the intestinal tract wall.
False diverticula, also known as pseudodiverticula, occur when herniation of mucosa and submucosa through a defect in the
muscular wall occurs (eg, Zenker diverticulum).
A special type of pseudodiverticula, believed to represent dilated excretory ducts of esophageal submucosal glands, is observed in the condition esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis.
acquired diverticula of the esophagus and hypopharynx also may be classified according to their pathogenesis as pulsion diverticula or traction diverticula.
Pulsion diverticula form as a result of high intraluminal pressures against weaknesses in the GI tract wall.
Zenker diverticulum occurs due to increased pressure in the oropharynx during swallowing against a closed upper esophageal sphincter.
An epiphrenic diverticulum occurs from increased pressure during esophageal propulsive contractions against a closed lower esophageal sphincter.
In contrast, traction diverticula occur as a consequence of pulling forces on the outside of the esophagus from an adjacent inflammatory process (eg, involvement of inflamed mediastinal lymph nodes in tuberculosis or histoplasmosis).
Most esophageal diverticula occur in middle-aged adults and elderly people.
Presentation in infants and children is rarely seen.
Zenker diverticula typically present in people older than 50 years and especially present during the seventh and eighth decades of life
Over time, an esophageal diverticulum can lead to some health complications.
Aspiration pneumonia. If an esophageal diverticulum causes regurgitation, it can lead to aspiration pneumonia. This is a lung infection caused by inhaling things, such as food and saliva, that usually travel down your esophagus.
Obstruction. An obstruction near the diverticulum can make it hard, if not impossible, to swallow. This can also cause the pouch to rupture and bleed.
Squamous cell carcinoma. In very rare cases, ongoing irritation of the pouch can lead to squamous cell carcinoma.
Typically, esophageal diverticula are nuisances that enlarge slowly over many years, gradually producing increasing symptoms, such as dysphagia, regurgitation and aspiration pneumonia, caused by breathing in regurgitated diverticula content.
Regurgitation caused by a diverticulum often occurs at night when lying down, which can lead to choking, aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection caused by pulmonary aspiration, the entry of secretions or foreign material into the trachea and lungs), and lung abscesses.
When symptoms of esophageal diverticula worsen, a person may be unable to swallow due to an obstruction near the diverticulum; rarely, the esophagus may rupture.
An obstruction or rupture caused by an esophageal diverticulum is dangerous, and both complications require immediate attention.
Although rare, squamous cell carcinoma can develop in 0.5 percent of those with diverticula.
This is thought to be caused by chronic irritation of the diverticula by prolonged food retention.
It is important to note that the fear of cancer is not a reason to surgically treat diverticula.
A review of the barium esophagram is helpful to confirm the size and location of the diverticulum relative to the diaphragm and GE junction.
It also defines the esophageal anatomy in terms of degree of esophageal dilation and presence of megaesophagus or sigmoid appearance in the setting of achalasia.
The patient’s diet should be restricted to clear liquids for 2 days prior to surgery to minimize the accumulation of food debris in the diverticulum prior to operation.
The anesthesiologist must be informed that rapid sequence induction is needed to minimize risk of aspiration.
After induction of anesthesia, upper endoscopy should be performed to delineate esophageal anatomy, rule out malignancy, and remove debris from the
pouch. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should also evaluate for the presence of a “pop,” which is consistent with achalasia.
Prophylactic antibiotics should be administered prior to skin incision, with consideration given to covering for oral flora, anaerobes, and yeast.
Standard procedures such as sequential compression devices and Foley catheter are employed.
Positioning of the patient varies with surgical approach.
When approaching epiphrenic diverticula from the abdomen, the patient is positioned supine.
Surgery was performed under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation, by the laparoscopic approach.
The patient was placed in a reverse Trendelenburg (30-degree) supine position with legs spread.
The surgeon stood between the patient's legs.
A Veress needle was inserted 5 cm above the umbilicus.
To form the pneumoperitoneum, CO at 10 mm Hg was used.
The trocar and video laparoscope were placed.
Under the control of the laparoscope, two trocars (10 mm and 12 mm) on the left side of the abdomen and two 10 mm trocars on the right side of the abdomen were inserted
Epiphrenic diverticula are those that occur in the distal 10 cm (lower third) of the esophagus.
They constitute approximately 20% of all esophageal diverticula.
Epiphrenic diverticula are thus false, or pulsion, diverticula.
Most commonly, epiphrenic diverticula occur in the setting of achalasia or diffuse esophageal spasm. A high-pressure environment in the esophageal lumen is potentially created by some form of distal functional or mechanical obstruction, such as a non relaxing, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES); repetitive normal to high amplitude simultaneous contractions; or a distal peptic stricture.
A prior fundoplication for the treatment of reflux may also lead to epiphrenic diverticula in the setting of an esophageal motility disorder.
The differential diagnosis of epiphrenic diverticula includes hiatal hernia, esophageal webs and strictures, esophageal duplication cyst, and esophageal
carcinoma.
Epiphrenic diverticula are estimated to be symptomatic in only 15% to 20% of cases.
Typical symptoms include dysphagia and regurgitation. Reflux and chest pain may also commonly occur.
Pulmonary symptoms may include chronic cough, productive or purulent sputum, or chronic dyspnea.
Malodorous breath may also be present.
The tests most commonly used to diagnose and evaluate esophageal diverticulum include:
Barium swallow: The patient swallows a barium preparation (liquid or other form) and its movement through the esophagus is evaluated using X-ray technology.
Gastrointestinal endoscopy: A flexible, narrow tube called an endoscope is passed through the gastrointestinal tract and projects images of the inside onto a screen.
Esophageal manometry: This test measures the timing and strength of esophagus contractions and muscular valve relaxations.
24-h pHmetry: A test to check for the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
A barium esophagram is the initial test performed to define the anatomy of the diverticulum and esophagus. Size, location, and right or left sidedness can be
determined from the esophagram.
This provides a “road map” for operative planning, as diverticula more than 7 to 10 cm above the diaphragm are not easily through the transhiatal route and may be better approached from the chest. Barium esophagrams may also offer information about motility.
Preoperative upper endoscopy is necessary to examine the esophagus and stomach for the presence of Barrett’s, esophagitis, and to exclude malignancy.2
In addition, the presence of a pop upon passage of the scope across the LES may further confirm the diagnosis of achalasia. Lastly, it is important to remove
debris from the diverticulum on the day of surgery.
manometry is helpful to better define underlying motility disorders.
can be helpful to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter pressure, lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, and esophageal body function in symptomatic patients if achalasia or another esophageal motility disorder is suspected or if surgery is being considered.
It can also demonstrate the incoordination between the buccal squirt and relaxation of the cricopharyngeus, although special manometric techniques are usually required.
High-resolution manometry, the current gold standard, is necessary to evaluate for an underlying esophageal motility disorder. In the setting of achalasia,
manometry demonstrates aperistalsis with a nonrelaxing LES. Other manometric patterns seen in the setting of epiphrenic diverticula include diffuse
esophageal spasm (80% or more simultaneous contractions of normal amplitude), nonspecific motility disorder, nutcracker esophagus, or hypertensive LES.
Failure to identify and treat the underlying motility disorder during diverticulum resection has been associated with high rates of recurrence and leak along the
suture line in the range of 10% to 20%.1 Specifically, failure to perform an adequate myotomy in such patients has yielded leak rates exceeding 25% when
diverticulectomy alone is performed.
Cases of esophageal diverticulum that cause minor symptoms can be treated through lifestyle changes, such as eating a bland diet, chewing food thoroughly, and drinking plenty of water after meals.
Over-the-counter antacids can also help with mild symptoms.
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
The need for surgical resection of epiphrenic diverticula largely depends on the patient’s symptoms. Small, asymptomatic diverticula (less than 3 cm) often do
not require intervention. Symptomatic patients with small diverticula may benefit from myotomy (with concomitant partial fundoplication) to correct the
underlying motility disorder. Larger diverticula require diverticulectomy in addition to myotomy (with concomitant partial fundoplication).