Downloaded 48 times
![REFERENCES
• Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, Andrew, & Gustafson, D. (1975).
Group techniques for program planning a guide to nominal
:
group and Delphi processes. Glenview Ill.: Scott Foresman.
• Luff et al (2007) Augmented Paper: Developing relationships
between digital content and paper
• Oliver, M. (2012) Learning with technology as a coordinated
sociomaterial practice: digital literacies as a site of
praxiological study
• Varga-Atkins, McIsaac et al (2011) Using the nominal group
technique with clickers to research student experiences of e-
learning: a project report [http://slidesha.re/xQlBCg ]
• Varga-Atkins, McIsaac et al (2011) The Nominal Group
Technique – a practical guide for facilitators
[http://slidesha.re/AmYOgv]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/id275finalforuploadalt-c2012ngttechnologies-120926084039-phpapp02/75/Enhancing-Nominal-Group-Technique-using-technologies-a-demonstration-29-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byTünde Varga-Atkins
Enhancing Nominal Group Technique using technologies: a demonstration
The document presents a demonstration of enhancing the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) using various technologies for student feedback and evaluation. It outlines the stages of NGT, the challenges faced, and evaluates the effectiveness of technologies like polling and web-conferencing in facilitating group decision-making. Outcomes include improved feedback methods through structured group activities and the exploration of technology use in both face-to-face and online settings.
More Related Content
Similar to Enhancing Nominal Group Technique using technologies: a demonstration
More from Tünde Varga-Atkins
Enhancing Nominal Group Technique using technologies: a demonstration
- 1. Enhancing Nominal GroupTechnique using technologies: a demonstration (ID275) ALT-C 11-13 September 2012 Jaye McIsaac, Educational Development Tunde Varga-Atkins, eLearning Unit University of Liverpool ELESIG-funded project
- 2. OUTLINE • Introduction andpurpose • What is the Nominal Group Technique? • What is the problem? • Technologies we tried
- 3. OUTCOMES • To describethe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) as a student feedback & evaluation tool. • To evaluate the use of learning technologies in the process of a face- to-face NGT session. • To consider the value of using technologies in online settings using NGT.
- 4. WHAT IS NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE? • Structured group activity • One given topic • Facilitates group decision-making • Immediate results • Reduces researcher/participant bias - Delbecq & Van de Ven (1971)
- 5. NGT: STAGES Example question: ‘What would you change in your course?’ 1) Individual 2) Clarification and 3) Ranking responses responses consolidation
- 6. STAGE 1: WHATTO KEEP DOING (FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS) 1 2 3 Annotated Model Audio ,personalised answers feedbac feedback. k giving extensive commen 4 5 ts Giving Audio 6 model feedback Drafts that answers for for must be essay titles everythin submitted g! and marked prior final work
- 7. STAGE 2 :WHAT TO KEEP DOING (FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS) Model answers 4 2 Giving Model model answers answers for essay titles Audio feedback Personalised 3 Audio 5 6 Drafts that feedback feedbac Audio must be 1 k giving submitted Annotated feedback extensive for and marked ,personalise commen prior final feedback. everythin ts g! work
- 8. STAGE 3 :WHAT TO KEEP DOING (FEEDBACK) Item no. Item description 5 points 1 Annotated, personalised feedback 4 points 2 Giving model answers 3 points 4 Audio feedback 2 points 7 etc. 1 point 10 etc.
- 9. THE TOP FIVEQUALITIES OF GOOD FEEDBACK 1 Timing, quick Detailed, on how to 2 improve Applicable to future 3 work Personal 4 Consistent bw 5 markers
- 10. ‘PROBLEMS’ Credit by Nathan T. Baker
- 11. TECHNOLOGIES WE TESTED 1)Individual 2) Clarification and 3) Ranking responses responses consolidation
- 12. TECHNOLOGIES WE TESTED Polling: GoogleModerator mobile text-entry / MCQ polling online sticky- note: linoit.com clickers Web- conferencing
- 14. MOBILE TEXT ENTRY (E.G.POLLEVERYWHERE.COM, TEXTWALL.CO.UK) 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification
- 15. CLICKERS 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification
- 16. GUIDE TO NGT& PROJECT REPORT See References On slideshare.net , search for Nominal Group Technique
- 17. GOOGLE MODERATOR Live link:
- 18. GOOGLE MODERATOR 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification
- 19.
- 20. WEB-CONFERENCING 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification
- 21. ONLINE STICKY-NOTES: E.G.LINOIT.COM
- 22. LINOIT.COM 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification
- 23. TECHNOLOGIES TRIED FOR NOMINAL GROUP 1) Individual 2) 3) Ranking response Consolidation and clarification so…
- 24. FOR NOW: KEEPINGWITH and…
- 25. UNINTENDED OUTCOME 1: ONLINE SETTINGS
- 26. UNINTENDED OUTCOME 2: INOTHER STUDENT FEEDBACK METHODS
- 27. UNINTENDED OUTCOME 3: PAPER AS TECHNOLOGY • ubiquitous • manipulable • overlay • multi-items • text entry • legibility • visibility Image by Paul Duvall
- 28. THANK YOU Contact Jaye McIsaac J.Mcisaac@liverpool.ac.uk TundeVarga-Atkins tva@liverpool.ac.uk
- 29. REFERENCES • Delbecq, A.,Van de Ven, Andrew, & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning a guide to nominal : group and Delphi processes. Glenview Ill.: Scott Foresman. • Luff et al (2007) Augmented Paper: Developing relationships between digital content and paper • Oliver, M. (2012) Learning with technology as a coordinated sociomaterial practice: digital literacies as a site of praxiological study • Varga-Atkins, McIsaac et al (2011) Using the nominal group technique with clickers to research student experiences of e- learning: a project report [http://slidesha.re/xQlBCg ] • Varga-Atkins, McIsaac et al (2011) The Nominal Group Technique – a practical guide for facilitators [http://slidesha.re/AmYOgv]