ENFPC 2010

Outline Stochastic Approach to Inflation Warm Inflation Stochastic approach to Warm Inflation
Stochastic Approach to Warm Inflation
Leandro Alexandre da Silva
1
Rio de Janeiro State University
Department of Theoretical Physics
XXXI Encontro Nacional de F´ısica de Part´ıculas e Campos
01/09/2010
1
in collaboration with R.O. Ramos

1 Stochastic Approach to Inflation
2 Warm Inflation
3 Stochastic approach to Warm Inflation

Stochastic Approach to Inflation
When?
Stochastic Inflation: ∼ 1987
Why?
Exponentially rapid expansion → “freeze” of inflaton quantum
fluctuations on super-horizon scales
⇓
Inflaton fluctuations behave effectivelly as classical fluctuation
modes with random amplitudes
⇓
Emulates the growth of vacuum fluctuations by an effective
stochastic noise field which drives the dynamics of the
volume-smoothed inflaton → effective dynamics for
coarse-grained field φ

How?
Usual approach → decomposition of φ in a classical,
coarse-grained component and in a quantum fluctuation part:
Φ(x, t) → φ(x, t) + q(x, t) .
φ → coarse-grained scalar field averaged over approximatelly
all de Sitter horizon size 1/χ
q(x, t) → summarizes high frequency (k kh ≈ χ) quantum
fluctuations.
q(x, t) aproximated as a free, massless scalar field.

de Sitter metric:
ds2
= dxµ
dxν
gµν = −dt2
+ e2χt
dx2
,
Lagrangian density:
L =
1
2
√
−g [gµν
∂µΦ∂νφ − 2V (Φ)]
Equation of motion(EoM):
−3χ
∂
∂t
−
∂2
∂t2
+ e−2χt 2
Φ(x, t) −
∂V (Φ)
∂Φ
= 0

Making the field decomposition (slow-roll: ¨φ(x, t) ≈ 0):
3χ
∂
∂t
− e−2χt 2
[φ(x, t) + q(x, t)] +
∂V (φ)
∂φ
= 0
3χ
∂
∂t
− e−2χt 2
φ(x, t) +
∂V (φ)
∂φ
= 3χη(x, t) ,
Noise term:
η(x, t) ≡ −
∂
∂t
+
e−2χt
3χ
2
q(x, t)
Fourier mode expansion in de Sitter background:
q(x, t) ≡ d3
kWχ(k) σk
(t)e−ik·x
âk
+ σ∗
k
(t)eik·x
â†
k
.
Wχ(k) → filter or window function. Sharp momentum cutoff
implementation: Wχ(k) ≡ θ(k − χeχt).

σk
(t) ≡
1
2k(2π)3
χτ − i
χ
k
e−ikτ
.
Commutator:
[η(x, τ), η(y, τ)] = 0
⇓
Classical behaviour of quantum noise!

σk
(t) ≡
1
2k(2π)3
χτ − i
χ
k
e−ikτ
.
Commutator:
[η(x, τ), η(y, τ)] = 0
⇓
Classical behaviour of quantum noise!
Propagator:
0 | η(x, t)η(y, t ) | 0 =
χ3
4π2
δ(t − t )
sin τ | x − y |
τ | x − y |
.

Warm Inflation
Same basic ideas of cold inflation
Inflaton interacts with other fields → radiation production
A reheating process is no more necessary
Smooth transition to the radiation dominated regime
Thermal origin for the density perturbations
A. Berera and L. Z. Fang,Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1912 (1995):
Inflaton dynamics → Langevin-like equation

Microscopic motivation to Warm Inflation
Example:
S[φ, χ, σ] = d4
x
1
2
(∂µφ)2
−
1
2
m2
φφ2
−
λ
4!
φ4
+
1
2
(∂µχ)2
−
1
2
m2
χχ2
+
1
2
(∂µσ)2
−
1
2
m2
σσ2
−
g2
2
φ2
χ2
− f χσ2
.
φ → classical field in which dynamics we are interested in
χ → intermediate field that couples to σ and φ
σ → Thermally equilibrated field at temperature T

Microscopic motivation to Warm Inflation
Detailed calculation: Berera and Ramos, PRD63, 103509
(2001),Gleiser and Ramos, PRD50, 2441 (1994):
General Effective Equation of Motion (Homogeneous
approximation)
d2φ(t)
dt2
= −
dVeff(φ)
dφ
− φn
(t)
t
−∞
dt φn
(t ) ˙φ(t )Kχ(t − t )
+ φn
(t) ξ (t) ,
n = 0: additive noise→ φχ2 interaction
n = 1: multiplicative noise → φ2χ2 interaction

Markovian Approximation
Non-Markovian Equation of Motion:
∂2
t + m2
φ +
λ
3!
φ(t)2
φ(t) + φn
(t)
t
t0
dt K(t − t )φn
(t ) ˙φ(t )
= φn
(t)ξ(t) .
Markovian Approximation:
φn
(t)
t
t0
dt K(t − t )φn
(t ) ˙φ(t ) φ2n
(t) ˙φ(t)
t
t0→−∞
dt K(t − t )
→ Υ φ2n
(t) ˙φ(t) .
Markovian Equation of Motion:
¨φ + Υ φ2n ˙φ + m2
φφ +
λ
6
φ3
= φn
(t) ξ(t)

Figure: (a) mχ = 50H(0), (b) mχ = 150H(0) and (c) mχ = 250H(0)

More details about Markovian dynamics reliability:
R. L. S. Farias, R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva, Nonlinear
eﬀects in the dynamics governed by non-Markovian stochastic
Langevin-like equations, JPCS, in press
R. L. S. Farias, R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva, Numerical
Solutions for non-Markovian Stochastic Equations of Motion
Comp. Phys. Comm. 180, 574 (2009).
R. L. S. Farias, L. A. da Silva and R. O. Ramos,
Non-Markovian stochastic Langevin equations: Markovian and
non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 80, 031143 (2009)
R. L. S. Farias, R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva,Langevin
Simulations with Colored Noise and Non-Markovian
Dissipation Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 38 , no. 3B,
(2008)

Considering the additive case:
¨φ + [3H + Υ] ˙φ + V (φ) = ξ ,
¨a = −
8π
3m2
pl
ρr + ˙φ2
− V (φ) a ,
˙ρφ = −3
˙a
a
˙φ2
− Υ ˙φ2
+ ν ˙φ , ˙ρr = −4
˙a
a
ρr + Υ ˙φ2
− ξ ˙φ .

Stochastic approach to Warm Inflation
Back to stochastic approach: implement Warm Inflation
Modification of EoM:
∂φ(x, t)
∂t
=
1
3χ + Υ
e−2χt 2
φ(x, t) −
∂V (φ)
∂φ
+η(x, t)+ξ(x, t) .

Back to stochastic approach: implement Warm Inﬂation
Modiﬁcation of EoM:
∂φ(x, t)
∂t
=
1
3χ + Υ
e−2χt 2
φ(x, t) −
∂V (φ)
∂φ
+η(x, t)+ξ(x, t) .
Global analysis:
∂φ(t)
∂t
= −
1
3χ + Υ
∂V (φ)
∂φ
+ η(t) + ξ(t) ,
η(t)η(t ) =
χ3
4π2
δ(t − t )
ξ(t)ξ(t ) = βδ(t − t ) .

Considering a general SDE of the form
˙φ = h(φ, t) + g(φ, t)η(t) + f (φ, t)ξ(t) ,
we obtain a Fokker-Planck equation for η(t)ξ(t ) = 0 of the form
∂P(φ, t)
∂t
= −
∂
∂φ
D(1)
+
∂2
∂φ2
D(2)
P(φ, t) .
where the Kramers-Moyal coeﬃcients are:
D(1)
(φ, t) = h(φ, t) +
α
2
∂g(φ, t)
∂φ
g(φ, t) +
β
2
∂f (φ, t)
∂φ
f (φ, t)
D(2)
(φ, t) =
α
2
g(φ, t)2
+
β
2
f (φ, t)2
.
(1)

In our particular case:
∂P(φ, t)
∂t
= −
∂
∂φ
−
1
3χ + Υ
∂V (φ)
∂φ
+
∂2
∂φ2
χ3
4π2
+
β
2
P(φ, t) .
A trick to obtain φn(t) :
∂
∂t
φn
(t) ≡
∞
−∞
dφφn ∂
∂t
P(φ, t) .
∂
∂t
φn
(t) =
χ3
8π2
+
β
2
n(n−1) φn−2
(t) −
n
3χ + Υ
φn−1
(t)
∂V (φ)
∂t
.
φ2
(t) =
3χ + Υ
2m2
φ
χ3
4π2
+ β 1 − exp −
2m2
φ
3χ + Υ
t .

The Fokker-Planck operator
LFP ≡ −
∂
∂φ
−
1
3χ + Υ
∂V (φ)
∂φ
+
∂2
∂φ2
χ3
4π2
+
β
2
,
is so that LFP = L†
FP.
⇒ Transformation of variables:
t → (3χ + Υ)t
φ → (3χ + Υ)
χ3
4π2
+
β
ψ

The Fokker-Planck becomes:
∂P(ψ, t )
∂t
=
2
∂2P(ψ, t )
∂ψ2
+
∂
∂ψ
∂ ˜V (ψ)
∂ψ
P(ψ, t ) ,
where
˜V (ψ) ≡ (3χ + Υ)
χ3
4π2
+
β
−1
V φ = (3χ + Υ)
χ3
4π2
+
β
ψ
One more transformation
P(ψ, t ) = exp
1 ˜V (0) − ˜V (ψ) F(ψ, t ) ,
and then the Fokker-Planck equation becomes...

...a Schr¨odinger-like equation with imaginary time:
−
2
∂2
∂ψ2
+ U(ψ) F(ψ, t ) = −
∂F(ψ, t )
∂t
, (2)
with
U(ψ) ≡
1
2

 ∂ ˜V (ψ)
∂ψ
2
−
∂2 ˜V (ψ)
∂ψ2

 . (3)
Analogy with quantum mechanics:
ψ | α, t =
λ
ψ | λ λ | α, t → F(ψ, t ) =
λ
cλe− i
Eλt
ϕλ(ψ) ,
with
Hϕλ(ψ) = Eλϕλ(ψ) , H ≡ −
2
∂2
∂ψ2
+ U(ψ) , t →
i
t

Then using standard operator techniques and recovering the
original variables φ and t, we get:
P(φ, t) =
λ
cλe−m2
φσ−1
λt
×
Λ
1
2
π
1
4
√
2λλ!
m2
φ
(λ
2 − 3
4 )
m2
φΛ−1
φ −
∂
∂φ
λ
exp
m2
φΛ−1
φ2
,
And the propagator K(φ2, t2; φ1, t1):
K(φ2, t2; φ1, t1) = 1 − e−2m2
φσ−1
(t2−t1)
− 1
2
×
exp



−
m2
φΛ−1
φ2
2 + φ2
1 − 2φ2φ1e−m2
φσ−1
(t2−t1)
1 − e−2m2
φσ−1(t2−t1)



with Λ ≡ (3χ + Υ) χ3
4π2 + β
and σ ≡ 3χ + Υ

Discussions and perspectives
Planck energy scale at V (φ = φmax ) → breakdown of
semiclassical picture of spacetime
⇓
P(φmax ) = 0
⇓
Bounded from above eigenvalues
H eigenvalues ∈ N → LFP eingenvalues ∈ Z−
⇓
Highest eigenvalue (˜λmax ) of volume-weighted FP equation
(LFP → LFP + 3H) can be negative or positive: warm inﬂation
→ ˜λmax > 0 → number of inﬂating domains increases without
limit. (to appear in JCAP)

Discussions and perspectives
Work out the local (φ(x, t)) analysis
Study the pathway to classicalization: when the thermal
fluctuations overcome the quantum ones?
Better quantify eternal inflation based on Warm Inflation

Thanks for your attention!!!

ENFPC 2010

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (11)

Similar to ENFPC 2010

Similar to ENFPC 2010 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ENFPC 2010