This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms that contribute to propagation of competence in an Agile
Scrum team. This study seeks to challenge the traditional view of bounded rationality (BR). An Agile Scrum
team (Team) is expected to build problem solving competence quickly as the expected ramp up time
continues to shrink. But the team has a mixture of expertise, competence and sociability levels that affect
out-of-the-box performance. The objective is to expand BR into the social realm and see how teams can
self-organize and reconfigure to allow effective problem solving. Studies have shown that agent-based
computational simulation is an appropriate technique to explore this point from a theoretical perspective.
(Fioretti, 2013) (Secchi, 2015). The first step is to define the problem, discuss how senior team members
exhibit high curiosity and apply sociability and cognitive resources to develop overall team competence.
This dynamic is modeled and simulated in NetLogoR and the results are analyzed. Finally, some key
findings are presented and discussed.
Adaptive Structuration Theory examines how groups interact with technology and each other to develop social structures and communication patterns. It focuses on how groups appropriate the rules and resources available to them to accomplish goals. The theory proposes 7 principles about how technology features, tasks, and social interactions shape group decisions and structures over time. It can be applied at the micro, meso, and macro levels to understand and guide group communication.
JuliaThere is an art to projecting management. Knowing how to m.docxtawnyataylor528
Julia:
There is an art to projecting management. Knowing how to move a group of people who all has a common goal but all have a different point of views takes some skills this person will also need systematization. But along with a person to help everyone stay focus and moving the technology that is used for communication is also very important. Making sure everyone can communicate and send files that everyone can case and edit can help keep the project moving forward. Picking the right software from the beginning will make the sharing of information easy. Now for Brook’s Law, I believe if the right people are added and understand the objective this may not slow down the project. Adding a programmer or someone else to help write the simple code like for a table whiles the other people who have been on the project creates the more complex code is a great use of adding people. Everything about project management is about placement and communication.
Mantilla, Gloria E. Vela. "Community Systematization And Learning: Project Management For Change." Community Development Journal 45.3 (2010): 367-379. Political Science Complete. Web. 8 Dec. 2016
Charlene:
Hi Class,
“Project Management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques applied to project activities in order to meet the project requirements. Project management is a process that includes planning, putting the project plan into action, and measuring progress and performance.” I think a good project manager makes sure the project is completed within the time scheduled, within budget and good quality. While it is rare that a project goes without any mishaps, a good project manager would be able to catch those issues early if he/she is communicating and writing things down as the project progresses.
I think Fredric Brooks book The Mythical Man-Monthdoes have some truth to it still to this day especially regarding communication. While technology has advanced and there are smarter people, if the communication is not clear on how a project should go, workers' interpretations of what they thought was stated, could lead to a disaster. Knowledgeable, skilled workers who are not afraid to ask questions is the key.
http://cnx.org/content/m31508/latest/
Charlene
S U M M E R 2 0 0 9 V O L . 5 0 N O . 4
R E P R I N T N U M B E R 5 0 4 1 2
Frank Siebdrat, Martin Hoegl and Holger Ernst
How to Manage
Virtual Teams
SMR322
This document is authorized for use only in Leadership and Teams by Dev Team from July 2012 to January 2015.
SUMMER 2009 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 63COURTESY OF SAP
TEAMS ARE THE typical building blocks of an organization: They provide companies with
the means to combine the various skills, talents and perspectives of a group of individuals to achieve
corporate goals. In the past, managers used to colocate team members because of the high levels of
interdependencies that are inherent in group work. Recently, though, more and more ...
This document summarizes a presentation on how social networks impact organizational learning. It discusses two key concepts - organizational learning, which is how organizations acquire, retain, and apply knowledge, and social networks, which embody past knowledge and shape future knowledge transfer. The presentation examines the relationship between these two concepts, exploring how networks impact knowledge creation, retention, and transfer within organizations. It uses a case study of student company networks and learning to empirically test these relationships.
Acs Sept 2008 Leadership Prm Linked In Edited Versiontuffley
This document summarizes a presentation on leadership of integrated virtual teams. It defines leadership and discusses generic, integrated team, and virtual team leadership factors. It presents a process reference model that integrates these three categories of leadership factors. Preliminary validation efforts with four organizations found the model to accurately capture leadership processes and provide benefits like process improvement identification.
The 3 Dimensions of Design: A Model to scale the Human-Centered Problem-Solvi...Andrea Picchi
Abstract. Design is a human-centered, problem-solving, practice that happens inside three dimensions. These dimensions are defined by the thinking and doing activities, and the environment where these two events take place.
After an introduction (section 1 and 2) to the landscape that developed the main idea behind this essay, the paper illustrates (section 3 and 4) the connection between design and being human-centered, and presents a framework that supports the creation of a human-centered organization. Subsequently (section 5.1), the paper articulates the abilities demanded by the thinking and the doing activities and shows how to scale them across the workforce. Following (section 5.2) the paper introduces the characteristics that an environment must possess to engender and promote the thinking and doing activities proposing a real implementation that can be allocated to a multidisciplinary team.
The paper also compares (section 6) the proposed framework against three popular approaches used to bring a design function inside an organization analyzing their nature and limitations. In the final part (section 7), the paper articulates some conclusions pointing the direction for further elaborations.
Reconceptualising Design Research for Design Seeking and Scaling. Short position paper by Cook and Bannan, June 2013. **Critical comment and pointers to related literature invited** Contact: john2.cook@uwe.ac.uk
Harnessing Collective Intelligence: Shifting Power To The EdgeMike Gotta
Socially-oriented systems create inter-connections across groups and communities that enable workers to leverage the collective intelligence of an organization. Sense-making tools and decision-making systems are more critical than ever before but need to be re-invented for a net-centric environment.
This document introduces the concept of "functional stupidity" to describe how organizations rely not just on intelligence but also the denial of cognitive abilities. The authors argue that functional stupidity, defined as a lack of reflexivity, substantive reasoning and justification, can facilitate organizational functioning by providing certainty. However, it can also trap organizations in problematic patterns of thinking. The authors develop a model of functional stupidity and how it arises from contexts dominated by image and symbolic manipulation, and is reinforced through "stupidity management" that represses doubt.
Adaptive Structuration Theory examines how groups interact with technology and each other to develop social structures and communication patterns. It focuses on how groups appropriate the rules and resources available to them to accomplish goals. The theory proposes 7 principles about how technology features, tasks, and social interactions shape group decisions and structures over time. It can be applied at the micro, meso, and macro levels to understand and guide group communication.
JuliaThere is an art to projecting management. Knowing how to m.docxtawnyataylor528
Julia:
There is an art to projecting management. Knowing how to move a group of people who all has a common goal but all have a different point of views takes some skills this person will also need systematization. But along with a person to help everyone stay focus and moving the technology that is used for communication is also very important. Making sure everyone can communicate and send files that everyone can case and edit can help keep the project moving forward. Picking the right software from the beginning will make the sharing of information easy. Now for Brook’s Law, I believe if the right people are added and understand the objective this may not slow down the project. Adding a programmer or someone else to help write the simple code like for a table whiles the other people who have been on the project creates the more complex code is a great use of adding people. Everything about project management is about placement and communication.
Mantilla, Gloria E. Vela. "Community Systematization And Learning: Project Management For Change." Community Development Journal 45.3 (2010): 367-379. Political Science Complete. Web. 8 Dec. 2016
Charlene:
Hi Class,
“Project Management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques applied to project activities in order to meet the project requirements. Project management is a process that includes planning, putting the project plan into action, and measuring progress and performance.” I think a good project manager makes sure the project is completed within the time scheduled, within budget and good quality. While it is rare that a project goes without any mishaps, a good project manager would be able to catch those issues early if he/she is communicating and writing things down as the project progresses.
I think Fredric Brooks book The Mythical Man-Monthdoes have some truth to it still to this day especially regarding communication. While technology has advanced and there are smarter people, if the communication is not clear on how a project should go, workers' interpretations of what they thought was stated, could lead to a disaster. Knowledgeable, skilled workers who are not afraid to ask questions is the key.
http://cnx.org/content/m31508/latest/
Charlene
S U M M E R 2 0 0 9 V O L . 5 0 N O . 4
R E P R I N T N U M B E R 5 0 4 1 2
Frank Siebdrat, Martin Hoegl and Holger Ernst
How to Manage
Virtual Teams
SMR322
This document is authorized for use only in Leadership and Teams by Dev Team from July 2012 to January 2015.
SUMMER 2009 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 63COURTESY OF SAP
TEAMS ARE THE typical building blocks of an organization: They provide companies with
the means to combine the various skills, talents and perspectives of a group of individuals to achieve
corporate goals. In the past, managers used to colocate team members because of the high levels of
interdependencies that are inherent in group work. Recently, though, more and more ...
This document summarizes a presentation on how social networks impact organizational learning. It discusses two key concepts - organizational learning, which is how organizations acquire, retain, and apply knowledge, and social networks, which embody past knowledge and shape future knowledge transfer. The presentation examines the relationship between these two concepts, exploring how networks impact knowledge creation, retention, and transfer within organizations. It uses a case study of student company networks and learning to empirically test these relationships.
Acs Sept 2008 Leadership Prm Linked In Edited Versiontuffley
This document summarizes a presentation on leadership of integrated virtual teams. It defines leadership and discusses generic, integrated team, and virtual team leadership factors. It presents a process reference model that integrates these three categories of leadership factors. Preliminary validation efforts with four organizations found the model to accurately capture leadership processes and provide benefits like process improvement identification.
The 3 Dimensions of Design: A Model to scale the Human-Centered Problem-Solvi...Andrea Picchi
Abstract. Design is a human-centered, problem-solving, practice that happens inside three dimensions. These dimensions are defined by the thinking and doing activities, and the environment where these two events take place.
After an introduction (section 1 and 2) to the landscape that developed the main idea behind this essay, the paper illustrates (section 3 and 4) the connection between design and being human-centered, and presents a framework that supports the creation of a human-centered organization. Subsequently (section 5.1), the paper articulates the abilities demanded by the thinking and the doing activities and shows how to scale them across the workforce. Following (section 5.2) the paper introduces the characteristics that an environment must possess to engender and promote the thinking and doing activities proposing a real implementation that can be allocated to a multidisciplinary team.
The paper also compares (section 6) the proposed framework against three popular approaches used to bring a design function inside an organization analyzing their nature and limitations. In the final part (section 7), the paper articulates some conclusions pointing the direction for further elaborations.
Reconceptualising Design Research for Design Seeking and Scaling. Short position paper by Cook and Bannan, June 2013. **Critical comment and pointers to related literature invited** Contact: john2.cook@uwe.ac.uk
Harnessing Collective Intelligence: Shifting Power To The EdgeMike Gotta
Socially-oriented systems create inter-connections across groups and communities that enable workers to leverage the collective intelligence of an organization. Sense-making tools and decision-making systems are more critical than ever before but need to be re-invented for a net-centric environment.
This document introduces the concept of "functional stupidity" to describe how organizations rely not just on intelligence but also the denial of cognitive abilities. The authors argue that functional stupidity, defined as a lack of reflexivity, substantive reasoning and justification, can facilitate organizational functioning by providing certainty. However, it can also trap organizations in problematic patterns of thinking. The authors develop a model of functional stupidity and how it arises from contexts dominated by image and symbolic manipulation, and is reinforced through "stupidity management" that represses doubt.
This document introduces the concept of "functional stupidity" to describe how organizations rely not just on intelligence but also on a lack of reflexivity and justification. The authors argue that functional stupidity, which refers to an absence of questioning and avoidance of justifications, is prevalent in contexts dominated by image and symbolic manipulation. This can have productive outcomes like providing certainty, but also corrosive consequences like creating individual and organizational dissonance. The paper aims to challenge the assumption that organizations solely rely on intelligence and to propose a new concept to understand organizational life.
MEDIATING EFFECT OF OCB ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE S...IAEME Publication
This document summarizes a research paper that studied the relationship between job attitudes, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and knowledge sharing behavior among employees of Add Soft Technologies in Bangalore, India. The study found:
1) There was a significant relationship between employee knowledge sharing and their job attitudes. Employees with more positive job attitudes were more likely to share knowledge.
2) There was also a significant relationship between job attitudes and OCB. More positive job attitudes led to greater OCB among employees.
3) OCB had a mediating effect on the relationship between job attitudes and knowledge sharing behavior. Positive job attitudes increased OCB, which then increased knowledge sharing.
A demonstration of some of the potential for social network analysis.
This is a previously-posted file which I had meant to narrate, but the sound didn't work out. I have added annotations to this file.
System Dynamics Understanding: Part II - Connectivity-groupthink or heightene...Dr. Elliot Bendoly
Having the same information is certainly not the same as sharing common approaches to thinking about problems. Nor is it equivalent to acquiescing independent thought to that of others (groupthink). Yet with all of the research on information sharing and group work in operations contexts, these distinctions have seldom been made. As normative researchers continue to pursue ways to incorporate human behavior into their models, this lack of distinction may prove misleading. Fortunately recent methods for measuring an individual’s strength in a particular approach to thinking have been applied to empirically demonstrate its value above and beyond other forms of expertise. Specifically the extent to which individuals share an understanding of system dynamics principles has been shown to yield performance benefits in team project settings. Competing against this view are recent normative models such as that of LiCalzi and Surucu (2012) in which such a lack of diversity contributes to phenomena such as groupthink, thus limiting the ability of a team to success in project work. This study reconciles these perspectives using the LiCalzi-Surucu model as a foundation for capturing competing effects on a typical performance measure for SCM technology implementation teams: schedule adherence. The results support the idea that both benefits and penalties may derive from increased levels of shared system dynamics understanding. The overall impact appears highly nonlinear. Nevertheless where there are certain domains in which benefits appear offset by losses, schedule adherence seems to be a strictly non-decreasing function of this understanding. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.
This paper explores obstacles to knowledge sharing motivations within organizations. The author conducted interviews with 14 employees of a research organization. Preliminary results identified two major themes: organizational structure and social interaction. At the project level, strong identification formed through shared goals and experiences motivated knowledge sharing. However, at the team level, deidentification due to unclear roles and objectives hindered motivations. Additionally, lack of feedback, work pressures, and inflexible policies presented further obstacles by failing to acknowledge or support knowledge sharing behaviors. The results indicate that organizational structures can both encourage and hinder motivations through identification and feedback, highlighting the need for organizations to understand how social contexts influence knowledge sharing.
An Analytical Study on Knowledge Sharing within the Organizationijcnes
The better management of knowledge within the organization will lead to improved innovation and competitive advantage. The main goal of the firm� better utilization of internal and external knowledge. This core knowledge is found in individuals, communities of interest and their connections. An organization�s data is found in its computer systems but a company�s intelligence is found, in its biological and social systems. Though it is acclaimed as a good method, there are some setbacks in the process of knowledge sharing[KS] among the employees. This paper explores the possible ways to establish organization using social computing tools to facilitate Knowledge Sharing and create a social data mining among all the members of organization. Social Data Mining Network Analysis (SDMNA) techniques have been used to study KS patterns which take place between employees and departments. This SDMNA graph reveals the structure of social data mining network highlighting connectivity, clustering and strength of relationships between employees.
Top Ten Workplace Skills for Future OrganizationsCSCJournals
Many researchers have indicated that there are skills that are going to be essential for the future workforce. This review helps identify these skills and the applicability of these skills to job performance of the future organization competing in a globalized environment. The review provides insight into each of the ten listed skills and also information on how the skills will be useful for future organizations. The review will extend previous literature regarding the identified ten skills essential for future organizations. Providing this analysis of the literature and potential applicability of these identified essential skills will help guide and focus additional studies relating to future job performance requirements.
Hospitality Supervision And Management
We Also Provide SYNOPSIS AND PROJECT.
Contact www.kimsharma.co.in for best and lowest cost solution or
Email: amitymbaassignment@gmail.com
Call: 9971223030
This document discusses enhancing resilience between organizations through loose couplings and organizational learning. It presents a model showing how loose couplings, which enable self-organization and emerging processes, can improve inter-organizational resilience during complex codesign projects. The model was developed by analyzing data from a codesign project between an aerospace company and its partner. The analysis identified both tight couplings through formal cooperation and loose couplings through informal cooperation. Loose couplings were found to create positive outcomes like knowledge sharing and coordination, while their absence led to inefficiencies. The model proposes that a balance of tight and loose couplings provides the control and flexibility needed for codesign projects to adapt to changes.
This essay discusses the importance of organizational structure for businesses. It begins by defining organizational structure and explaining its purpose. The second paragraph discusses three main types of organizational structures - functional, divisional, and matrix structures. The third paragraph analyzes factors that influence the choice of organizational structure, such as a company's strategy, size, and industry. The conclusion restates the key role of organizational structure in allowing businesses to operate efficiently.
The essay opens by defining organizational structure as the framework for how job tasks are divided and how information flows within a company. It states that structure provides the foundation for how a business is operated and managed. The second paragraph then
Effective Communication- Organizational BehaviorTosif Mir
The document discusses how different organizations adapt to different communication media. It analyzes data on employee preferences for communication methods like email, phone calls, and video conferencing. The results show that marketing employees prefer email most while educational institutions prefer face-to-face interactions. Creative jobs were found to be more rewarding with lower effort levels compared to non-creative jobs. Female employees felt less satisfied in their jobs but worked harder and saw themselves as team players compared to males, who were more satisfied but less hardworking.
This document describes a study that used machine learning to analyze online knowledge sharing conversations between students collaboratively solving problems. The researchers used Hidden Markov Models to classify knowledge sharing episodes as either effective or ineffective based on features of the conversation. They were able to accurately classify episodes 93% of the time, significantly better than random chance. The study provides insights into how to better understand and assess how students share and assimilate new knowledge in collaborative learning groups.
PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTECEDENTS TO EMERGENCE OF TEAM AUTONOMY IN AGILE SCRUM TEAMSijseajournal
Agile project management methods are gaining in popularity in the software industry as software
development teams are being asked to be adaptive to market needs and resilient to change and uncertainty.
With increasing market uncertainty, global competition, and time-to-market pressure, it is becoming a
challenge to develop an innovative product and deliver it on-time without the opportunity that comes from
team autonomy to experiment and learn from failures. The purpose of this research study was to study the
influence of key psychological factors on emergence of Agile team autonomy that leads to Agile project
success in software organizations. Using an online survey instrument, the study sampled 137 software
professionals from US software companies with experience in the Agile Scrum role of Team Member. The
relationship between the human psychology factors pertaining to leadership style, organization structure,
human resource practices, customer engagement and Agile team autonomy is explained through multiple
linear regression. One-way ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to demonstrate the
existence (or nonexistence) of relationships between variables. Finally, an empirical model relating the
human psychology factor variables and the dependent variable of Agile team autonomy was constructed
for the population.
Effects of internal_social_media_and_ocb____research_proposal[1]SohailTariq16
This research proposal aims to examine the impact of internal social media on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. The student proposes to investigate whether internal social media engages employees, the effect of positive voice behavior on employee engagement, and whether internal social media affects organizational citizenship behavior. The proposal outlines the research questions, contribution, objectives, theoretical model relating internal social media to employee engagement and citizenship behavior, and provides a literature review on internal communication, social media, and their benefits and challenges.
This document summarizes a research study on strategic opinion leadership for the adoption of cyberinfrastructure (CI). The researchers interviewed 15 members of the e-science community to identify strategies that opinion leaders can use to promote CI adoption. Three key strategies were identified: 1) using storytelling and tailored narratives to engage others, 2) acting as teachers/facilitators to train others to adopt innovations, and 3) enabling opinion leaders to connect with and influence many community members through interpersonal communication. The researchers conclude these strategies can be employed together to spread influence within a community and accelerate the adoption of CI.
Supporting user innovation activities in crowdsourcing communityMiia Kosonen
The document discusses supporting user-driven innovation activities in crowdsourcing communities. It examines how perceived support from a crowdsourcing community affects users' intentions to share knowledge. Specifically, it analyzes the relationships between knowledge sharing intentions and (1) collaborative norms, (2) trust in the hosting company, (3) ease of use of technology, and (4) knowledge-based support. A survey of 241 users of an ideas crowdsourcing platform in China finds that trust in the hosting company and technology/knowledge support positively influence knowledge sharing, while collaborative norms did not have a significant effect.
Using these slides, I presented my paper titled "Institutional works in scholarly networks: A rapprochement between agency and structure" at the 2014 Academy of Management annual meeting. In the paper, I attempt to find an answer to the question: how noble ideas emerge in academia?
The Psychology of Successful Business Communications in Geographically Isolat...Healthcare consultant
It is our belief that teams and individuals are most effective when they are presented with a range of communications options and clear information on which will be most effective at any given time. Knowing the communications preferences of your team members, and being able to see their status or ‘presence’ in advance of making contact can have a significant positive impact on the effectiveness of team working and knowledge sharing. Simple and instant access to a range of rich communications options that brings together text, voice and video allows individuals and groups to benefit from much of the additional information that co-located teams take for granted – without the hassle-factor of booking specialist facilities.
Teaching Excellence in the Social Sciences conference 2015Pamela McKinney
Presentation on the situational analysis of student reflective writing at the University of Sheffield conference on Teaching Excellence in the Social Sciences March 2015
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...IJECEIAES
This paper describes a speed control device for generating electrical energy on an electricity network based on the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) used for wind power conversion systems. At first, a double-fed induction generator model was constructed. A control law is formulated to govern the flow of energy between the stator of a DFIG and the energy network using three types of controllers: proportional integral (PI), sliding mode controller (SMC) and second order sliding mode controller (SOSMC). Their different results in terms of power reference tracking, reaction to unexpected speed fluctuations, sensitivity to perturbations, and resilience against machine parameter alterations are compared. MATLAB/Simulink was used to conduct the simulations for the preceding study. Multiple simulations have shown very satisfying results, and the investigations demonstrate the efficacy and power-enhancing capabilities of the suggested control system.
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSIJNSA Journal
The smart irrigation system represents an innovative approach to optimize water usage in agricultural and landscaping practices. The integration of cutting-edge technologies, including sensors, actuators, and data analysis, empowers this system to provide accurate monitoring and control of irrigation processes by leveraging real-time environmental conditions. The main objective of a smart irrigation system is to optimize water efficiency, minimize expenses, and foster the adoption of sustainable water management methods. This paper conducts a systematic risk assessment by exploring the key components/assets and their functionalities in the smart irrigation system. The crucial role of sensors in gathering data on soil moisture, weather patterns, and plant well-being is emphasized in this system. These sensors enable intelligent decision-making in irrigation scheduling and water distribution, leading to enhanced water efficiency and sustainable water management practices. Actuators enable automated control of irrigation devices, ensuring precise and targeted water delivery to plants. Additionally, the paper addresses the potential threat and vulnerabilities associated with smart irrigation systems. It discusses limitations of the system, such as power constraints and computational capabilities, and calculates the potential security risks. The paper suggests possible risk treatment methods for effective secure system operation. In conclusion, the paper emphasizes the significant benefits of implementing smart irrigation systems, including improved water conservation, increased crop yield, and reduced environmental impact. Additionally, based on the security analysis conducted, the paper recommends the implementation of countermeasures and security approaches to address vulnerabilities and ensure the integrity and reliability of the system. By incorporating these measures, smart irrigation technology can revolutionize water management practices in agriculture, promoting sustainability, resource efficiency, and safeguarding against potential security threats.
More Related Content
Similar to EFFECT OF SOCIABILITY AND CURIOSITY OF SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN BUILDING AGILE SCRUM TEAM COMPETENCY
This document introduces the concept of "functional stupidity" to describe how organizations rely not just on intelligence but also on a lack of reflexivity and justification. The authors argue that functional stupidity, which refers to an absence of questioning and avoidance of justifications, is prevalent in contexts dominated by image and symbolic manipulation. This can have productive outcomes like providing certainty, but also corrosive consequences like creating individual and organizational dissonance. The paper aims to challenge the assumption that organizations solely rely on intelligence and to propose a new concept to understand organizational life.
MEDIATING EFFECT OF OCB ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE S...IAEME Publication
This document summarizes a research paper that studied the relationship between job attitudes, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and knowledge sharing behavior among employees of Add Soft Technologies in Bangalore, India. The study found:
1) There was a significant relationship between employee knowledge sharing and their job attitudes. Employees with more positive job attitudes were more likely to share knowledge.
2) There was also a significant relationship between job attitudes and OCB. More positive job attitudes led to greater OCB among employees.
3) OCB had a mediating effect on the relationship between job attitudes and knowledge sharing behavior. Positive job attitudes increased OCB, which then increased knowledge sharing.
A demonstration of some of the potential for social network analysis.
This is a previously-posted file which I had meant to narrate, but the sound didn't work out. I have added annotations to this file.
System Dynamics Understanding: Part II - Connectivity-groupthink or heightene...Dr. Elliot Bendoly
Having the same information is certainly not the same as sharing common approaches to thinking about problems. Nor is it equivalent to acquiescing independent thought to that of others (groupthink). Yet with all of the research on information sharing and group work in operations contexts, these distinctions have seldom been made. As normative researchers continue to pursue ways to incorporate human behavior into their models, this lack of distinction may prove misleading. Fortunately recent methods for measuring an individual’s strength in a particular approach to thinking have been applied to empirically demonstrate its value above and beyond other forms of expertise. Specifically the extent to which individuals share an understanding of system dynamics principles has been shown to yield performance benefits in team project settings. Competing against this view are recent normative models such as that of LiCalzi and Surucu (2012) in which such a lack of diversity contributes to phenomena such as groupthink, thus limiting the ability of a team to success in project work. This study reconciles these perspectives using the LiCalzi-Surucu model as a foundation for capturing competing effects on a typical performance measure for SCM technology implementation teams: schedule adherence. The results support the idea that both benefits and penalties may derive from increased levels of shared system dynamics understanding. The overall impact appears highly nonlinear. Nevertheless where there are certain domains in which benefits appear offset by losses, schedule adherence seems to be a strictly non-decreasing function of this understanding. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.
This paper explores obstacles to knowledge sharing motivations within organizations. The author conducted interviews with 14 employees of a research organization. Preliminary results identified two major themes: organizational structure and social interaction. At the project level, strong identification formed through shared goals and experiences motivated knowledge sharing. However, at the team level, deidentification due to unclear roles and objectives hindered motivations. Additionally, lack of feedback, work pressures, and inflexible policies presented further obstacles by failing to acknowledge or support knowledge sharing behaviors. The results indicate that organizational structures can both encourage and hinder motivations through identification and feedback, highlighting the need for organizations to understand how social contexts influence knowledge sharing.
An Analytical Study on Knowledge Sharing within the Organizationijcnes
The better management of knowledge within the organization will lead to improved innovation and competitive advantage. The main goal of the firm� better utilization of internal and external knowledge. This core knowledge is found in individuals, communities of interest and their connections. An organization�s data is found in its computer systems but a company�s intelligence is found, in its biological and social systems. Though it is acclaimed as a good method, there are some setbacks in the process of knowledge sharing[KS] among the employees. This paper explores the possible ways to establish organization using social computing tools to facilitate Knowledge Sharing and create a social data mining among all the members of organization. Social Data Mining Network Analysis (SDMNA) techniques have been used to study KS patterns which take place between employees and departments. This SDMNA graph reveals the structure of social data mining network highlighting connectivity, clustering and strength of relationships between employees.
Top Ten Workplace Skills for Future OrganizationsCSCJournals
Many researchers have indicated that there are skills that are going to be essential for the future workforce. This review helps identify these skills and the applicability of these skills to job performance of the future organization competing in a globalized environment. The review provides insight into each of the ten listed skills and also information on how the skills will be useful for future organizations. The review will extend previous literature regarding the identified ten skills essential for future organizations. Providing this analysis of the literature and potential applicability of these identified essential skills will help guide and focus additional studies relating to future job performance requirements.
Hospitality Supervision And Management
We Also Provide SYNOPSIS AND PROJECT.
Contact www.kimsharma.co.in for best and lowest cost solution or
Email: amitymbaassignment@gmail.com
Call: 9971223030
This document discusses enhancing resilience between organizations through loose couplings and organizational learning. It presents a model showing how loose couplings, which enable self-organization and emerging processes, can improve inter-organizational resilience during complex codesign projects. The model was developed by analyzing data from a codesign project between an aerospace company and its partner. The analysis identified both tight couplings through formal cooperation and loose couplings through informal cooperation. Loose couplings were found to create positive outcomes like knowledge sharing and coordination, while their absence led to inefficiencies. The model proposes that a balance of tight and loose couplings provides the control and flexibility needed for codesign projects to adapt to changes.
This essay discusses the importance of organizational structure for businesses. It begins by defining organizational structure and explaining its purpose. The second paragraph discusses three main types of organizational structures - functional, divisional, and matrix structures. The third paragraph analyzes factors that influence the choice of organizational structure, such as a company's strategy, size, and industry. The conclusion restates the key role of organizational structure in allowing businesses to operate efficiently.
The essay opens by defining organizational structure as the framework for how job tasks are divided and how information flows within a company. It states that structure provides the foundation for how a business is operated and managed. The second paragraph then
Effective Communication- Organizational BehaviorTosif Mir
The document discusses how different organizations adapt to different communication media. It analyzes data on employee preferences for communication methods like email, phone calls, and video conferencing. The results show that marketing employees prefer email most while educational institutions prefer face-to-face interactions. Creative jobs were found to be more rewarding with lower effort levels compared to non-creative jobs. Female employees felt less satisfied in their jobs but worked harder and saw themselves as team players compared to males, who were more satisfied but less hardworking.
This document describes a study that used machine learning to analyze online knowledge sharing conversations between students collaboratively solving problems. The researchers used Hidden Markov Models to classify knowledge sharing episodes as either effective or ineffective based on features of the conversation. They were able to accurately classify episodes 93% of the time, significantly better than random chance. The study provides insights into how to better understand and assess how students share and assimilate new knowledge in collaborative learning groups.
PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTECEDENTS TO EMERGENCE OF TEAM AUTONOMY IN AGILE SCRUM TEAMSijseajournal
Agile project management methods are gaining in popularity in the software industry as software
development teams are being asked to be adaptive to market needs and resilient to change and uncertainty.
With increasing market uncertainty, global competition, and time-to-market pressure, it is becoming a
challenge to develop an innovative product and deliver it on-time without the opportunity that comes from
team autonomy to experiment and learn from failures. The purpose of this research study was to study the
influence of key psychological factors on emergence of Agile team autonomy that leads to Agile project
success in software organizations. Using an online survey instrument, the study sampled 137 software
professionals from US software companies with experience in the Agile Scrum role of Team Member. The
relationship between the human psychology factors pertaining to leadership style, organization structure,
human resource practices, customer engagement and Agile team autonomy is explained through multiple
linear regression. One-way ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to demonstrate the
existence (or nonexistence) of relationships between variables. Finally, an empirical model relating the
human psychology factor variables and the dependent variable of Agile team autonomy was constructed
for the population.
Effects of internal_social_media_and_ocb____research_proposal[1]SohailTariq16
This research proposal aims to examine the impact of internal social media on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. The student proposes to investigate whether internal social media engages employees, the effect of positive voice behavior on employee engagement, and whether internal social media affects organizational citizenship behavior. The proposal outlines the research questions, contribution, objectives, theoretical model relating internal social media to employee engagement and citizenship behavior, and provides a literature review on internal communication, social media, and their benefits and challenges.
This document summarizes a research study on strategic opinion leadership for the adoption of cyberinfrastructure (CI). The researchers interviewed 15 members of the e-science community to identify strategies that opinion leaders can use to promote CI adoption. Three key strategies were identified: 1) using storytelling and tailored narratives to engage others, 2) acting as teachers/facilitators to train others to adopt innovations, and 3) enabling opinion leaders to connect with and influence many community members through interpersonal communication. The researchers conclude these strategies can be employed together to spread influence within a community and accelerate the adoption of CI.
Supporting user innovation activities in crowdsourcing communityMiia Kosonen
The document discusses supporting user-driven innovation activities in crowdsourcing communities. It examines how perceived support from a crowdsourcing community affects users' intentions to share knowledge. Specifically, it analyzes the relationships between knowledge sharing intentions and (1) collaborative norms, (2) trust in the hosting company, (3) ease of use of technology, and (4) knowledge-based support. A survey of 241 users of an ideas crowdsourcing platform in China finds that trust in the hosting company and technology/knowledge support positively influence knowledge sharing, while collaborative norms did not have a significant effect.
Using these slides, I presented my paper titled "Institutional works in scholarly networks: A rapprochement between agency and structure" at the 2014 Academy of Management annual meeting. In the paper, I attempt to find an answer to the question: how noble ideas emerge in academia?
The Psychology of Successful Business Communications in Geographically Isolat...Healthcare consultant
It is our belief that teams and individuals are most effective when they are presented with a range of communications options and clear information on which will be most effective at any given time. Knowing the communications preferences of your team members, and being able to see their status or ‘presence’ in advance of making contact can have a significant positive impact on the effectiveness of team working and knowledge sharing. Simple and instant access to a range of rich communications options that brings together text, voice and video allows individuals and groups to benefit from much of the additional information that co-located teams take for granted – without the hassle-factor of booking specialist facilities.
Teaching Excellence in the Social Sciences conference 2015Pamela McKinney
Presentation on the situational analysis of student reflective writing at the University of Sheffield conference on Teaching Excellence in the Social Sciences March 2015
Similar to EFFECT OF SOCIABILITY AND CURIOSITY OF SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN BUILDING AGILE SCRUM TEAM COMPETENCY (20)
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...IJECEIAES
This paper describes a speed control device for generating electrical energy on an electricity network based on the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) used for wind power conversion systems. At first, a double-fed induction generator model was constructed. A control law is formulated to govern the flow of energy between the stator of a DFIG and the energy network using three types of controllers: proportional integral (PI), sliding mode controller (SMC) and second order sliding mode controller (SOSMC). Their different results in terms of power reference tracking, reaction to unexpected speed fluctuations, sensitivity to perturbations, and resilience against machine parameter alterations are compared. MATLAB/Simulink was used to conduct the simulations for the preceding study. Multiple simulations have shown very satisfying results, and the investigations demonstrate the efficacy and power-enhancing capabilities of the suggested control system.
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSIJNSA Journal
The smart irrigation system represents an innovative approach to optimize water usage in agricultural and landscaping practices. The integration of cutting-edge technologies, including sensors, actuators, and data analysis, empowers this system to provide accurate monitoring and control of irrigation processes by leveraging real-time environmental conditions. The main objective of a smart irrigation system is to optimize water efficiency, minimize expenses, and foster the adoption of sustainable water management methods. This paper conducts a systematic risk assessment by exploring the key components/assets and their functionalities in the smart irrigation system. The crucial role of sensors in gathering data on soil moisture, weather patterns, and plant well-being is emphasized in this system. These sensors enable intelligent decision-making in irrigation scheduling and water distribution, leading to enhanced water efficiency and sustainable water management practices. Actuators enable automated control of irrigation devices, ensuring precise and targeted water delivery to plants. Additionally, the paper addresses the potential threat and vulnerabilities associated with smart irrigation systems. It discusses limitations of the system, such as power constraints and computational capabilities, and calculates the potential security risks. The paper suggests possible risk treatment methods for effective secure system operation. In conclusion, the paper emphasizes the significant benefits of implementing smart irrigation systems, including improved water conservation, increased crop yield, and reduced environmental impact. Additionally, based on the security analysis conducted, the paper recommends the implementation of countermeasures and security approaches to address vulnerabilities and ensure the integrity and reliability of the system. By incorporating these measures, smart irrigation technology can revolutionize water management practices in agriculture, promoting sustainability, resource efficiency, and safeguarding against potential security threats.
We have compiled the most important slides from each speaker's presentation. This year’s compilation, available for free, captures the key insights and contributions shared during the DfMAy 2024 conference.
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...IJECEIAES
Climate change's impact on the planet forced the United Nations and governments to promote green energies and electric transportation. The deployments of photovoltaic (PV) and electric vehicle (EV) systems gained stronger momentum due to their numerous advantages over fossil fuel types. The advantages go beyond sustainability to reach financial support and stability. The work in this paper introduces the hybrid system between PV and EV to support industrial and commercial plants. This paper covers the theoretical framework of the proposed hybrid system including the required equation to complete the cost analysis when PV and EV are present. In addition, the proposed design diagram which sets the priorities and requirements of the system is presented. The proposed approach allows setup to advance their power stability, especially during power outages. The presented information supports researchers and plant owners to complete the necessary analysis while promoting the deployment of clean energy. The result of a case study that represents a dairy milk farmer supports the theoretical works and highlights its advanced benefits to existing plants. The short return on investment of the proposed approach supports the paper's novelty approach for the sustainable electrical system. In addition, the proposed system allows for an isolated power setup without the need for a transmission line which enhances the safety of the electrical network
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniquesnooriasukmaningtyas
The growing significance of portable systems to limit power consumption in ultra-large-scale-integration chips of very high density, has recently led to rapid and inventive progresses in low-power design. The most effective technique is adiabatic logic circuit design in energy-efficient hardware. This paper presents two adiabatic approaches for the design of low power circuits, modified positive feedback adiabatic logic (modified PFAL) and the other is direct current diode based positive feedback adiabatic logic (DC-DB PFAL). Logic gates are the preliminary components in any digital circuit design. By improving the performance of basic gates, one can improvise the whole system performance. In this paper proposed circuit design of the low power architecture of OR/NOR, AND/NAND, and XOR/XNOR gates are presented using the said approaches and their results are analyzed for powerdissipation, delay, power-delay-product and rise time and compared with the other adiabatic techniques along with the conventional complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) designs reported in the literature. It has been found that the designs with DC-DB PFAL technique outperform with the percentage improvement of 65% for NOR gate and 7% for NAND gate and 34% for XNOR gate over the modified PFAL techniques at 10 MHz respectively.
Embedded machine learning-based road conditions and driving behavior monitoringIJECEIAES
Car accident rates have increased in recent years, resulting in losses in human lives, properties, and other financial costs. An embedded machine learning-based system is developed to address this critical issue. The system can monitor road conditions, detect driving patterns, and identify aggressive driving behaviors. The system is based on neural networks trained on a comprehensive dataset of driving events, driving styles, and road conditions. The system effectively detects potential risks and helps mitigate the frequency and impact of accidents. The primary goal is to ensure the safety of drivers and vehicles. Collecting data involved gathering information on three key road events: normal street and normal drive, speed bumps, circular yellow speed bumps, and three aggressive driving actions: sudden start, sudden stop, and sudden entry. The gathered data is processed and analyzed using a machine learning system designed for limited power and memory devices. The developed system resulted in 91.9% accuracy, 93.6% precision, and 92% recall. The achieved inference time on an Arduino Nano 33 BLE Sense with a 32-bit CPU running at 64 MHz is 34 ms and requires 2.6 kB peak RAM and 139.9 kB program flash memory, making it suitable for resource-constrained embedded systems.
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
Generative AI leverages algorithms to create various forms of content
EFFECT OF SOCIABILITY AND CURIOSITY OF SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN BUILDING AGILE SCRUM TEAM COMPETENCY
1. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
DOI: 10.5121/ijsea.2022.13501 1
EFFECT OF SOCIABILITY AND CURIOSITY OF
SENIOR DEVELOPERS IN BUILDING AGILE
SCRUM TEAM COMPETENCY
Ravi Kalluri
Department of Engineering Management & Systems Engineering,
Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
ABSTRACT
This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms that contribute to propagation of competence in an Agile
Scrum team. This study seeks to challenge the traditional view of bounded rationality (BR). An Agile Scrum
team (Team) is expected to build problem solving competence quickly as the expected ramp up time
continues to shrink. But the team has a mixture of expertise, competence and sociability levels that affect
out-of-the-box performance. The objective is to expand BR into the social realm and see how teams can
self-organize and reconfigure to allow effective problem solving. Studies have shown that agent-based
computational simulation is an appropriate technique to explore this point from a theoretical perspective.
(Fioretti, 2013) (Secchi, 2015). The first step is to define the problem, discuss how senior team members
exhibit high curiosity and apply sociability and cognitive resources to develop overall team competence.
This dynamic is modeled and simulated in NetLogoR and the results are analyzed. Finally, some key
findings are presented and discussed.
KEYWORDS
ABS, Agent Based Modeling, NetLogo, Teams, Agile, Scrum, Knowledge Management
1. INTRODUCTION
This study explores how the curiosity and sociability traits, if present in the senior developers of
an Agile Scrum team, can improve team wide problem-solving competence. This paper
introduces a refined version of Bounded Rationality (BR) that is socially oriented (Simon, 1993).
In particular, it makes the distinction between senior developers who operate within the
boundaries of their team (i.e. sociable) and those who extend their reach outside of those
boundaries and norms (i.e. curious). An existing agent-based simulation model is repurposed
where agents represent developers and user stories. A key trait for agent developer is competence
while a key trait for agent story is difficulty.
The curiosity and sociability traits of a senior developer are expected to combine team member
competences in a way that makes problem solving more efficient. This is due to the
understanding that the integration of knowledge from the various team members is done non-
linearly, i.e. exponentially increasing or decreasing the original knowledge base of the curious
senior developers. Conversely, other non-curious senior developers would combine competences
in a linear fashion, and this makes knowledge integration more directly dependent on the existing
competences (preferred to be at higher level). In other words, curiosity may add an emergent
element to team competence that is not included in the original knowledge base of each team
member. This synergy has the potential to dramatically increase the efficiency of knowledge
integration and resilience in an Agile Scrum team when dealing with complex problems.
2. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
2
The paper shows how the traits of sociability and curiosity enable senior members in an Agile
Scrum team to collaborate with junior team members in completing user stories and in the
process raise the overall team competence. It shows that BR can be considered as a social process
and the simulation of team dynamics reveals how social attitudes can aid in problem solving.
The paper is structured as follows. Section 1 provides an introduction. Section 2 presents the
theoretical background and literature review relevant to the study, supporting reasons for inquiry,
and contextual background. Section 3 discusses the Agent Based Simulation model. Section 4
describes the procedures, data analysis and simulation results. Section 5 discusses the
implications, future work and concludes the paper. This is followed by references and an
appendix.
2. RELATED WORK
2.1. Bounded Rationality (BR)
Simon (1955, 1997) posited that rationality is always bounded in the sense that a decision is made
regardless of all the alternatives that are available. That is because of the inherently limited
alternatives available in any given situation (March, 1994) (Simon, 1997). The limitations forced
upon our rationality by our inherent boundedness prevent us from selecting the optimal set of
means (Secchi, 2016). This limits our ability to effectively solve complex problems. The result is
we end up creating new problems. For example, figuring out how to increase cooperation in a
team is a complex goal. According to Simon, it is not possible to take the goal and work
backwards to derive the sequence of the right means, as the traditional view on BR would
assume. The manner in which the team members need to engage with each other and with the
environment has to be atypical in order to find a potential solution. (Chia and Holt, 2009)
(Secchi, 2016).
Simon (1955, 1997) suggests that engagement with the environment is central to BR as a source
of resources. There is a tendency exhibited by certain agents (members of a team) who rely more
on gaining competency through social channels by watching the senior team members. The
context of “social channels” has changed with the advent of the internet (Secchi, 2011) (Magnani
et al., 2007). Competency can be gained by direct consultation with a team member or by
technological instruments (i.e. smartphones) or services (i.e. social media like Facebook or
Twitter, Google search, etc.).
A senior developer (senior team member) who is sociable, prefers to make decisions assuming
the existence of a social group to refer to. (Bardone, 2011) (Secchi and Bardone, 2009, 2013).
Therefore, sociable individuals intrinsically take a more collaborative stance on decision-making.
When this sociability trait is exhibited by the senior team members, there is rapid diffusion of
competence to the novice team members. This enables faster build-up of overall team
effectiveness in solving problems (completing user stories).
Lalsing (2012) studied three different sized Agile teams developing products based on the same
technologies and using Scrum. Both objective and subjective measures were used and the results
are supported by a survey. The results clearly show that for agile methodologies to work well, it
is crucial to select the “right” people for the right team.
However, the variety of ways in which an agent (sociable, senior developer) may actually engage
with the other team members is not fully understood. The impact of sociability is well
substantiated when interactions within a group are stable and well-defined, but it is unclear how
3. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
3
much this concept is useful when groups are formed ad hoc or when the decision maker reaches
out to members of other groups (the environment).
The motivation for creation is higher for the agent as it leads to competency gain and external
recognition. The internal sharing of information, on the other hand, develops the team as a whole
but eats into the time for personal advancement and also narrows the competency gap with more
junior developers. With such complex psychological forces at work, it is hard to assess whether
the notion of sociability can really have an impact on the way in which bounded agents may
really act. There is thus a need to define a more inclusive term “curiosity” for the specific type of
engagement that the agent has with the environment and the team. A curious agent is
continuously learning by enquiry and openly exploring ideas and decisions with the team and
environment using the available social channels.
The notion of curiosity is not aligned with the extant view on BR because it prompts the agent to
learn from open-ended explorations of complex problems and to accept the complexity of
decision-making. Curiosity has been referred to as an “openness to cognitive diversity” (Klein
and Kozlowski, 2000) and “cross-understanding” (Meslec and Graff, 2015). Curiosity allows the
team member (agent) to cross existing boundaries of cooperation to form new knowledge
associations for both personal and team interests.
2.2. Sociability and Curiosity
Sociability places importance on the information provided by social channels and an inclination
for individuals to share ideas with like-minded people and collaborate. (Simon, 1993) (Knudsen,
2003). But sociability refers to situations in which a person works with other people on
something that is mostly defined. Thomsen (2016) explains this concept with teams of medical
doctors and nurses in the emergency room of a hospital. The ER team members are sociable
individuals as they tend to work within boundaries that are set beforehand. This is a worldview
specifying already accepted templates of thinking along with the identification of specific and
well-defined problems and issues to deal with. Sociability can lead to formation of tight
couplings among team members and, possibly, an entire organization but there is a risk that the
organization becomes unfit to learn and adapt to the changing external environment (Rivkin,
2000), reaching what Siggelkow and Rivkin (2005) call “sticking points”.
Curiosity, on the other hand, breaks preset patterns of behavior and allows individuals to see
unexpected connections among apparently unrelated things (Bardone, 2011). From a social point
of view, curious individuals reach out to others to explore problems more broadly (beyond the
immediate team) and facilitate a solution (Secchi, 2011). The way these individuals interact with
others is oriented toward gaining a better understanding of the problem at hand. Their use of
information is not simply the sum of what is available from others but a restructuring of available
expertise to find the best solution. The focus is on gaining new knowledge and understanding by
interacting with the social environment. If sociability allows self-organization to emerge within a
team, curiosity has the potential to establish new consortiums, both within and outside the team.
This is necessary to build a resilient team. This is in contrast with the literature on “shared
cognition” (Cannon-Bowers et al., 1993) (Cannon-Bowers and Salas, 2001) (McAvoy and Butler,
2007), where individuals share a mental model or group think to make the team more effective.
Curiosity requires openness to learning and engaging with other people regardless of their
background, position and role within an organization and may lead to better problem-solving.
From this perspective, curiosity serves as a catalyst to sociability and makes team self-
organization and resilience possible. The next section discusses how the sociability enhanced by
curiosity of senior team members (agents with high competence) helps in building overall team
4. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
4
competency and eventually productivity, self-organization and resilience in an Agile Scrum team
with the aid of an agent-based simulation (ABS) model.
3. THE ABS MODEL
Curiosity is seen as a tool that links agents together; hence, it affects how teams deal with
problems. Agent-based modeling (ABM) is a simulation technique that has been increasingly
used in the social sciences (Secchi and Neumann, 2016) (Fioretti, 2013) and its properties have
recently been explored in relation to teams (Secchi, 2015).
3.1. Objectives of the Model
The purpose of this model is to understand the impact of sociability and curiosity on boundedly
rational agents that are confronted with complex problems. As mentioned above, curious senior
developers reach out to others within and outside the team to explore problems more broadly and
facilitate a solution. The way these individuals interact with others is oriented toward gaining a
better understanding of the problem at hand. Their use of information (competence, c in the
model) is not simply the sum of what is available from others but a deliberate reassembly of
knowledge with the aim of finding the most effective solution. Given these assumptions, the
model attempts to explore whether individuals with sociability and curiosity deal with problems
better than individuals with sociability but lower curiosity, thus offering a better way to build
overall team competence. The model mimics an organizational environment, where simulated
developers (agents) have to deal with problems, and Agile teams are swarming around problems
when one simulated developer cannot solve the problem alone. This represents an opportunity to
explore how ad hoc teams are formed and how the sociability and curiosity behaviors of the
senior team members influence competency building in the team.
3.2. Agents and Parameters
The model has two separate types of agents: stories (st) and developers (sd). The stories are
characterized by level of difficulty (d) which is a random-normal value. The developers have a
level of competence c that is also a random-normal value. The competence level c is an agent’s
knowledge, and it can be applied to a problem as a direct function of the efforts necessary to find
a solution. In other words, c can be thought of as a set of cognitive abilities that each and every
individual has in line with the tradition of studies on BR (Kahneman, 2003) (Gigerenzer and
Selten, 2001). These are operational abilities that aid in problem solving. If c > d, then a problem
gets solved, and competence of the agents responsible for finding a good solution increases at a
fixed rate ri in [0.15, 0.30]. When a solution cannot be found, then the competence rate decreases
at a fixed rate rd in [0, 0.05, 0.1]. This information is updated at every step of the simulation. All
parameters and respective values are summarized in Table 1. A difficulty level d for each
problem is not taken as an objective value because it depends on competence level c, the
combination of agents around a given problem and the inclination of the agents to share and
combine c based on their sociability and curiosity levels.
5. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
5
Table 1. Parameter notations and values.
Parameter Values Description
Steps 10 The maximum number of opportunities
that developers have to interact with
each other when working on stories
Initial number of user
stories, Nst,0
50, 100, 200 Initial number of user stories in the
product backlog at time zero
Problem spin-off, pso 2, 4, 10 This is the factor by which stories can
increase at any step of the simulation
Initial number of
developers, Nsd,0
50, 100, 200 Initial number of developers in an
Agile Scrum team at time zero
Difficulty, d ~N (3, 1), ~N (1, 1) Each story is associated with a
difficulty level that is random-normally
distributed
Competence, c ~N (1, 1.5), ~N (2, 1.5), ~N
(3, 1.5)
This is the expertise of each developer
that is needed to complete a story
Competence increase
rate, ri
0.15, 0.30 The rate at which competence
increases when a story is completed
Competence decrease
rate, rd
0, 0.05, 0.1 The rate at which competence
decreases when a story is not
completed
Sociable developer,
sosd
~ N (0, 1) This is the sociability of each
developer and inclination on
information coming from others in the
team
Sociable true, false This influences the ways of working of
the developers in solving problems in a
team
Enquiry, e ~ N (0, 1) This is the enquiry level that would
make developers consider knowledge
coming from others in the environment
Curious true, false This influences the ways of working of
the developers in solving problems in a
team
Proximity [0, 20, 1] This is the value used to explore the
environment that surrounds each agent
The other characteristics of developers (sd) are enquiry e and socially oriented decision making
sosd or sociability. Developers (sd) with sosd < Mean(sosd) - 0.75·Stdev(sosd) are less prone to
use information from social channels to make decisions. On the other hand, those with sosd >
Mean(sosd) + 0.75·Stdev(sosd) are particularly inclined on using information from social
channels (other agents in the system) to make decisions. sosd models the behavior of developers
in a team with different dispositions toward giving and taking information, recommendations,
advice from others. Enquiry e is assigned to each agent using a random normal distribution.
When the level ei of a particular agent i is higher than the mean e, then there are higher gains
from cooperating with others. While high sosd indicates the ability to learn from others, e makes
the developer explore solutions outside of the team. sosd*c is the amount of competence that a
developer is willing to share with others without sacrificing individual growth and recognition.
Each developer (sd) scans the environment around it upto a pre-specified range and takes on
stories along with other agents (team members) within that range. The developers then start
sharing their knowledge (c), using different rules based on their sosd and e levels. Higher values
of sosd imply better access to one’s competence c. Also, developers with higher levels of sosd
6. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
6
embed other’s knowledge according to a non-linear effect, given by ∑jci + (sodmj·cj)sodmi·ci,
where the parameters indexed with i refer to the agent and those indexed with j refer to other
agents in range and connected to the agent i. Those with lower levels of sodm use a linear effect,
∑jci + (sodmj·cj). The assumption of this model is that curiosity triggers developers to process
information coming from social channels in a way that combines their competence with the
competence of others producing effects that may be valuable to problem solving. In the
simulation, it is possible to switch curiosity “on” and “off” to understand how it impacts group
decision-making and whether it enables more stories to be completed. The non-linear effect
operates in the model for high e and sosd agents only when curiosity is turned “on”.
Stories and developers with varying level of competence appear randomly in the simulated
environment. While the stories do not move at all in the simulation space, the developers move
around and try to find stories to complete. The developer’s task is to find stories and swarm a
team of other developers in the proximity around that story if he/she cannot solve it solely with
own competence level c. When connection between a story and a team is established, the team of
developers does not move until that story is done. Open stories are shown in green color. Done
stories are shown in blue color. Developers with high competence are depicted in red color,
intermediate developers are in yellow color and junior developers are in white color.
3.3. Process Overview
There are three steps in the simulation process. First, the agents (stories and developers) are
randomly distributed on the two-dimensional simulation space (patch) and are attributed the
characteristics described above. Second, the developers find stories, connect to them and to other
developers. Third, senior developers try to complete the story with their own knowledge ci, and,
if that is not enough, they combine knowledge from others in the team cj according to curiosity
levels (or its absence). We refer to those rules as linear and non-linear effects, the latter being
those for more curious agents. Also, sd agents increase or decrease their competence and
eventually change their general attitudes toward problem solving (sosd), depending on the results
of the previous round of interactions. This can be called behavior emergence of senior developers
in the team and is critical to competency building in a team.
4. PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
4.1. Procedures
The model was implemented in NetLogo 6.2.2, a free software for ABM (Wilensky, 1999).
Guidance was taken on how many times each simulation scenario should run (Secchi and
Gullekson, 2016) (Radax and Rengs, 2010). An attempt to reach a power of 0.95 at the 0.01
significance level and a conservative estimate of effect size, 0.1, resulted in approximately 30
runs for each simulation. The simulations were run in BehaviorSpace, a software tool integrated
with NetLogo that allows us to perform experiments with models. BehaviorSpace runs a model
many times, systematically varying the model’s settings and recording the results of each model
run. This process is sometimes called “parameter sweeping”. It lets us explore the model’s
“space” of possible behaviors and determine which combinations of settings cause the behaviors
of interest. In my computer with eight processor cores, eight simulations could be run in parallel.
4.2. Results
The main objective of the ABM simulation is to understand the effect of sociability and curiosity
of senior developers (those with high problem-solving competence) on building the overall
7. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
7
competency of an Agile Scrum team. For this purpose, all other variables in the model were held
constant throughout the experiment as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. List of Constants.
Variable Value
Initial # stories (st) 100
Initial # developers (sd) 50
mean_enquiry 0
increase_comp_rate 0.13
tolerance 5.5
stdev_enquiry 5.1
decrease_comp_rate 0.64
mean_difficulty 5
stdev_difficulty 5.2
avoid-edges TRUE
stdev_soc-or-sd 5.03
mean_soc-or-sd 0.2
looking_for_stories TRUE
proximity 19
mean_competence 5.0
stdev_competence 9.7
The simulations involved varying the two variables sociable and curious in combination leading
to the following four scenarios:
Scenario 1: (Sociable = F; Curious = F)
Scenario 2: (Sociable = T; Curious = F)
Scenario 3: (Sociable = F; Curious = T)
Scenario 4: (Sociable = T; Curious = T)
Results of the NetLogo 6.2.2 simulation of the four scenarios are presented in Table 3.
8. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
8
Table 3. Simulation Results.
Variable Scenario 1
(Sociable = F;
Curious = F)
Scenario 2
(Sociable = T;
Curious = F)
Scenario 3
(Sociable = F;
Curious = T)
Scenario 4
(Sociable = T;
Curious = T)
Initial # stories (st) 100 100 100 100
Initial # sr. devs (sd) 50 50 50 50
# stories completed
(st.solved2) (median)
98 98 97 97
Time steps (t) (median) 4 3 4 2
Team velocity
(#stories completed / time)
(median)
28 25 32 46
Max # of stories completed by Mid-level dev Mid-level dev Senior dev Junior dev
Highest competence gained by
(median)
Junior dev Senior dev Junior dev Junior dev
Number of runs for each scenario (n) = 30
All scenarios use the team velocity (number of stories completed per unit time) as the dependent
variable and differ from each other in the sociable and curious binary values. The values listed
are the median values from 30 simulation runs for each of the four scenarios leading to a total of
120 runs. This was done to sufficiently account for the variability in the run results. The median
values can thus be considered as reliable indicators of the behaviors under study.
The team velocity is generally positively correlated with the condition of curiosity, that makes
senior developers with high competence (red sd’s) enhance their capacity to interact with and
develop the less competent team members (yellow and white sd’s). In the simulation, curious is a
Boolean variable, and it can be “true” (on) or “false” (off). The anchor for the results in the
model is the “false” condition, meaning that we observe what happens to the dependent variable
when curiosity is “true”. The strongest effect to team velocity (46) is observed when both
sociable and curious are set to “true”. When sociable is set to “false” and curious is still “true”,
the team velocity significantly lower (32). It is apparent that sociability enhances the effect of
curiosity and has a marginal although stable direct effect on team velocity.
Curiosity is the parameter that makes senior developers non-linearly combine efforts of the team
members. This implies that the way to combine competences together in a team is more efficient
when curiosity exists. This is evidenced by the fact that the curve for the number of (open) stories
declines more rapidly when curiosity is “on”.
Another interesting effect reported is the gain in competence of team members by initial
competence level. In all but one scenario, junior developers show the largest growth in
competence as a result of learning from their senior peers and observing them complete stories.
But it needs both sociable and curiosity for the junior developers to translate this enhanced
competence into a commensurate increase in velocity. Also, sociability of senior developers is
alone not sufficient to percolate their competence beyond mid-level developers. In the absence of
curiosity and a lack of tendency to learn from each other and other Agile Scrum teams in the
organization environment, sociability without curiosity does not grow any significant team wide
competence. The result also narrates something about the attachment preference of senior
developers – the preference is to attach with other senior developers followed by mid-level
developers and only in the end with junior developers. This might be revealing a natural
9. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
9
inclination of senior developers towards individual vs. team performance because attaching to
high competency developers may lead to more completed stories and hence more senior
developer velocity. This natural tendency is mitigated when senior developers exhibit both
sociability and curiosity. Sociability uses a linear approach to group shared competences to
approach problems, whereas curiosity uses a non-linear approach. When the parameter curiosity
is in place (i.e. set to “on”), senior developers are more effective in combining team members’
competence into the task to be performed or problem to be solved. This implies that the
performance on a given story depends on the senior developer that finds a connection to that
particular story and the team he/she forms with other developers for the task. The interpretation
of results is that senior developers with only sociability but no curiosity work better in a team
when the team members have something to offer (are also competent), and less inclined to share
when the “quality” (competence) of the team is low. For this individual tendency to be overcome,
senior developers need to have both sociability and curiosity.
5. IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The implication to practice is that what counts in an organization is not necessarily the single
piece of expertise that each individual may bring in. Conversely, what seems to count is more
related to the attitude that each individual has in relation to the problems the organization is
facing. This is particularly applicable to senior developers in the team. So, care should be taken
in hiring senior developers with behavior interviews that assess both sociability and curiosity
traits. It is the open-mindedness and curiosity of the developers that may help cross competence
gaps and subsequently bring about new and innovative perspectives, which would be simply
unthinkable in the rigid confinements of static competence levels. However, an empirical study of
a real Agile team is required to cement the understanding of how this may actually happen in
practice.
The curiosity trait may be relevant to organizations that face a crisis or operate in turbulent
environments. Employees that are capable of crossing the norms of their group and of integrating
knowledge on a wider basis can make a better use of human resources. Here again, this may
suggest that curious people adapt better to uncertainty, and they are consequently a better fit in
turbulent environments because that is not after all so far from their usual way of working. Agile
Scrum teams with sociable and curious members seem to find ways to increase their competence
more rapidly than other teams in the organization. This is because of the specific assumption we
have used to generate the model that sociable and curious team members collaborate better with
each other, regardless of seniority level and individual goals, to find new solutions to complex
problems. The best solution does not always come from the senior developers in the team
working on their own. It most often comes when senior developers work collaboratively with the
junior developers in their team as well as reach out to other teams in the Agile organization. As
more senior developers evidence this fact, they become more inclined to be sociable and curious.
There are some limitations in the approach taken to study the proposed model of rational
decision-making. First, competence c is represented by a number and that is an extremely
simplified version of the way knowledge actually materializes. This calls for expanded and more
sophisticated modeling. Second, the model only considers a constant number of developers and
stories. The effect of increasing the number of stories and/or developers on team velocity can be
the focus of a future study. Third, the effect of difficulty and mutation levels of stories on the
time to develop a similar level of team competence needs to be explored. Fourth, additional
factors like organization structure, rewards, stakeholder influence and leadership style should be
incorporated in an improved version of the model. Finally, there are several parameters in this
rich model that this study has not made use of and the hope is that they will be put to use in future
enquiries by other researchers.
10. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
10
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank Emanuele Bardone and Davide Secchi for providing the guidance
and source ABM model for this study. This study uses a modification of the Agent-based model
developed by them and is strongly motivated by the paper “Bardone, E. and Secchi, D. (2017),
"Inquisitiveness: distributing rational thinking", Team Performance Management, Vol. 23 No.
1/2, pp. 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0044.
REFERENCES
[1] Bardone, E. and Secchi, D. (2017). "Inquisitiveness: distributing rational thinking", Team
Performance Management, Vol. 23 No. 1/2, pp. 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0044.
[2] Bardone, E. (2011), Seeking Chances: From Biased Rationality to Distributed Cognition, volume 13
of Cognitive Systems Monographs, Springer, New York, NY.
[3] Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Salas, E. (2001). “Reflections on shared cognition”, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 195-202.
[4] Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Converse, S. (1993), “Shared mental models in expert team
decision making”, in Castellan, N.J. (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making, Lawrence
Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 221-246.
[5] Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy Without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[6] Cowley, S.J. and Vallee-Tourangeau, F. (Eds) (2013), Cognition beyond the Brain: Computation,
Interactivity and Human Artifice, Springer, London.
[7] Croissant, Y. and Millo, G. (2008), “Panel data econometrics in r: the plm package”, Journal of
Statistical Software, Vol. 27 No. 2.
[8] Ferdinand, A.E. (1974), A Theory of System Complexity, International Journal of General Systems,
1:1, 19-33, DOI: 10.1080/03081077408960745.
[9] Fioretti, G. (2013), “Agent-based simulation models in organization science”, Organizational
Research Methods, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-242.
[10] Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (2001), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
[11] Gilboa, I. (2010), Rational Choice, first edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[12] Greene, W.H. (2008), Econometric Analysis, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[13] Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[14] Kahneman, D. (2003), “A perspective of judgement and choice: mapping bounded rationality”,
American Psychologist, Vol. 58 No. 9, pp. 697-721.
[15] Klein, K. and Kozlowski, S. (2000), “From micro to meso: critical steps in conceptualizing and
conducting multilevel research”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 21 Nos 1/2, pp. 211-236.
[16] Knudsen, T. (2003), “Simon’s selection theory: why docility evolves to breed successful altruism”,
Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 229-244.
[17] Knudsen, T. and Levinthal, D.A. (2007), “Two faces of search: alternative generation and alternative
evaluation”, Organization Science, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-54.
[18] Kuhn, T. (2009), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th ed., Chicago University Press, Chicago.
[19] Lalsing, V. (2012). People Factors in Agile Software Development and Project Management.
International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 3(1), 117–137.
https://doi.org/10.5121/IJSEA.2012.3109.
[20] Lorscheid, I., Heine, B.O. and Meyer, M. (2012), “Opening the ‘black box’ of simulations: increased
transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments”,
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 22-62.
[21] Magnani, L. (2007), Morality in A Technological World: Knowledge as a Duty, Cambridge
University Press, New York.
[22] Magnani, L., Secchi, D. and Bardone, E. (2007), “The docile hacker: the open source model as a way
of creating knowledge”, in Schmidt, C. (Ed.), Proceedings from the International Conference on
Computers and Philosophy, i-C&P, Laval, pp. 583-596.
[23] March, J.G. (1994), A Primer on Decision Making, Free Press, New York, NY.
11. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
11
[24] McAvoy, J., & Butler, T. (2007). The impact of the Abilene Paradox on double-loop learning in an
agile team. Information and software technology, 49(6), 552-563.
[25] Meslec, N. and Graff, D. (2015), “Being open matters: the antecedents and consequences of cross-
understanding in teams”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 21 Nos 1/2, pp. 6-18.
[26] Miller, K.D. and Lin, S.J. (2010), “Different truths in different worlds”, Organization Science, Vol.
21 No. 1, pp. 97-114.
[27] Ossola, P. (2013), “Trust as a mechanism to increase ‘docility.’ a theoretical approach”, International
Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 495-520.
[28] Polhill, J.G. (2010), “ODD updated”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 13
No. 4, p. 9.
[29] Radax, W. and Rengs, B. (2010), “Prospects and pitfalls of statistical testing: insights from
replicating the demographic prisoner’s dilemma”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social
Simulation, Vol. 13 No. 4, p. 1.
[30] Rivkin, J.W. (2000), “Imitation of complex strategies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 824-
844.
[31] Secchi, D. (2011), Extendable Rationality: Understanding Decision Making in Organizations,
Springer, New York, NY.
[32] Secchi, D. (2015), “A case for agent-based model in organizational behavior and team research”,
Team Performance Management, Vol. 21 Nos 1/2, pp. 37-50.
[33] Secchi, D. (2016), “Boundary conditions for the emergence of ‘docility:’ An agent-based model and
simulation”, in Secchi, D. and Neumann, M. (Eds), Agent-Based Simulation of Organizational
Behavior: New Frontiers of Social Science Research, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 175-200.
[34] Secchi, D. and Adamsen, B. (2017), “Organizational cognition: a critical perspective on the theory in
use”, in Cowley, S.J. and Vallee-Tourangeau, F. (Eds), Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation,
Interactivity and Human Artifice, 2nd ed., Springer, Heidelberg.
[35] Secchi, D. and Bardone, E. (2009), “Super-docility in organizations: an evolutionary model”,
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 339-379.
[36] Secchi, D. and Bardone, E. (2013), “Socially distributed cognition and intra-organizational
bandwagons: theoretical framework, model, and simulation”, International Journal of Organization
Theory and Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 521-572.
[37] Secchi, D. and Gullekson, N. (2016), “Individual and organizational conditions for the emergence
and evolution of bandwagons”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 22 No.
1, pp. 88-133.
[38] Secchi, D. and Neumann, M. (Eds) ( 2016), Agent-Based Simulation of Organizational Behavior:
New Frontiers of Social Science Research, Springer, New York, NY.
[39] Secchi, D. and Seri, R. (2016), “Controlling for ‘false negatives’ in agent-based models: a review of
power analysis in organizational research”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory,
Vol. 23 No. 1.
[40] Seri, R. and Secchi, D. (2017), “The problem of determining the number of runs in your simulation”,
in Edmonds, B. and Meyer, R. (Eds), Simulating Social Complexity. A Handbook, 2nd ed., Springer,
Heidelberg.
[41] Siggelkow, N. and Rivkin, J.W. (2005), “Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence
and complexity”, Organization Science, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 101-122.
[42] Simon, H.A. (1955), “A behavioral theory of rational choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.
69 No. 1, pp. 99-118.
[43] Simon, H.A. (1990), “A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism”, Science, Vol. 250
No. 4988, pp. 1665-1668.
[44] Simon, H.A. (1993), “Altruism and economics”, American Economic Review, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp.
156-161.
[45] Simon, H.A. (1997), Administrative Behavior, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York, NY.
[46] Thomsen, S.E. (2016), “How docility impacts team efficiency: an agent-based modeling approach”,
in Secchi, D. and Neumann, M. (Eds), Agent-Based Simulation of Organizational Behavior: New
Frontiers of Social Science Research, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 159-173.
[47] von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[48] Wilensky, U. (1999), Netlogo: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling,
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
12. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), Vol.13, No.5, September 2022
12
APPENDIX
Figure 1. NetLogo 6.2.2 simulation environment.
AUTHOR
Ravi kalluri, MSME, MSEE, MBA, PMP, ACP, SPT, CSM, Ravi has 25 years of
experience leading complex programs, with an expertise in project risk management.
Currently, he serves as a Sr. Technical Program Manager at Amazon Web Services. He
has previously held program management roles at Cisco Systems, Citrix Systems,
Ericsson, CA Technologies, VeriSign, and Motorola. Ravi previously served as an
Adjunct Faculty of Project Management in the University of California System (Berkeley,
Irvine, Santa Cruz Extension campuses). He has conducted corporate trainings in Project
Management for Volkswagen of America as well as taught project management and risk management
courses for Northrop Grumman. His recent presentations include Project Risk Management for Business
Success in a Startup Environment at PMI Silicon Valley and Enabling Collaborative Software
Development in a Post-Acquisition Scenario at VeriSign Technical Symposium. Ravi received his MBA
from Northwestern University (Kellogg), MS in Electrical Engineering at Stanford, MS in Mechanical
Engineering at The Ohio State University, MS Certificate in Project Management from George Washington
University and Graduate Certificate in Systems Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.