This document defines and studies various weak forms of nano-open sets, including nano α-open sets, nano semi-open sets, and nano pre-open sets. It introduces these concepts in a nano topological space based on lower and upper approximations. Some key results shown are: 1) every nano-open set is nano α-open, 2) the family of nano α-open sets is contained within the families of nano semi-open and nano pre-open sets, and 3) the nano α-open sets equal the intersection of nano semi-open and nano pre-open sets. Examples are provided to illustrate these concepts.
Abstract: In this paper, we define and study about a new type of generalized closed set called, g∗s-closed set.Its relationship with already defined generalized closed sets are also studied
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological SpacesIOSR Journals
In this paper we introduce and study the concept of a new class of closed sets called (𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− regular generalized b- closed sets (briefly(𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb-closed) in bitopological spaces.Further we define and study new neighborhood namely (𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb- neighbourhood (briefly(𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb-nhd) and discuss some of their properties in bitopological spaces. Also, we give some characterizations and applications of it.
Abstract: In this paper, we define and study about a new type of generalized closed set called, g∗s-closed set.Its relationship with already defined generalized closed sets are also studied
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological SpacesIOSR Journals
In this paper we introduce and study the concept of a new class of closed sets called (𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− regular generalized b- closed sets (briefly(𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb-closed) in bitopological spaces.Further we define and study new neighborhood namely (𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb- neighbourhood (briefly(𝜏𝑖, 𝜏𝑗)− rgb-nhd) and discuss some of their properties in bitopological spaces. Also, we give some characterizations and applications of it.
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.IJERA Editor
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to exhibit the research on separation axioms in terms of nearly open sets viz
p-open, s-open, α-open & β-open sets. It contains the topological property carried by respective ℘ -Tk spaces (℘
= p, s, α & β; k = 0,1,2) under the suitable nearly open mappings . This paper also projects ℘ -R0 & ℘ -R1
spaces where ℘ = p, s, α & β and related properties at a glance. In general, the ℘ -symmetry of a topological
space for ℘ = p, s, α & β has been included with interesting examples & results.
In the present paper , we introduce and study the concept of gr- Ti- space (for i =0,1,2) and
obtain the characterization of gr –regular space , gr- normal space by using the notion of gr-open
sets. Further, some of their properties and results are discussed.
The determination of this paper is to introduce two new spaces , namely 𝑆𝑔
∗
-compact and 𝑆𝑔
∗
-
connected spaces. Additionally some properties of these spaces are investigated.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 54A05
In this paper we introduce a new class of sets known as
δ
ˆ
S –closed sets in ideal topological
spaces and we studied some of its basic properties and characterizations. This new class of sets lies
between –I–closed [19] sets and g–closed sets, and its unique feature is it forms topology and it is
independent of open sets.
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical GeometryArun Gupta
New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Original URL: http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/philo/shared/summer_school_2013/NYU.ppt
Tim Maudlin
NYU
Physics & Philosophy of Time
July 25, 2013
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesIJMER
In this paper we introduce and characterize some new generalized locally closed sets
known as
δ
ˆ
s-locally closed sets and spaces are known as
δ
ˆ
s-normal space and
δ
ˆ
s-connected space and
discussed some of their properties
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Gave a talk at StartCon about the future of Growth. I touch on viral marketing / referral marketing, fake news and social media, and marketplaces. Finally, the slides go through future technology platforms and how things might evolve there.
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.IJERA Editor
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to exhibit the research on separation axioms in terms of nearly open sets viz
p-open, s-open, α-open & β-open sets. It contains the topological property carried by respective ℘ -Tk spaces (℘
= p, s, α & β; k = 0,1,2) under the suitable nearly open mappings . This paper also projects ℘ -R0 & ℘ -R1
spaces where ℘ = p, s, α & β and related properties at a glance. In general, the ℘ -symmetry of a topological
space for ℘ = p, s, α & β has been included with interesting examples & results.
In the present paper , we introduce and study the concept of gr- Ti- space (for i =0,1,2) and
obtain the characterization of gr –regular space , gr- normal space by using the notion of gr-open
sets. Further, some of their properties and results are discussed.
The determination of this paper is to introduce two new spaces , namely 𝑆𝑔
∗
-compact and 𝑆𝑔
∗
-
connected spaces. Additionally some properties of these spaces are investigated.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 54A05
In this paper we introduce a new class of sets known as
δ
ˆ
S –closed sets in ideal topological
spaces and we studied some of its basic properties and characterizations. This new class of sets lies
between –I–closed [19] sets and g–closed sets, and its unique feature is it forms topology and it is
independent of open sets.
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical GeometryArun Gupta
New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Original URL: http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/philo/shared/summer_school_2013/NYU.ppt
Tim Maudlin
NYU
Physics & Philosophy of Time
July 25, 2013
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesIJMER
In this paper we introduce and characterize some new generalized locally closed sets
known as
δ
ˆ
s-locally closed sets and spaces are known as
δ
ˆ
s-normal space and
δ
ˆ
s-connected space and
discussed some of their properties
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Gave a talk at StartCon about the future of Growth. I touch on viral marketing / referral marketing, fake news and social media, and marketplaces. Finally, the slides go through future technology platforms and how things might evolve there.
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post FormatsBarry Feldman
If your B2B blogging goals include earning social media shares and backlinks to boost your search rankings, this infographic lists the size best approaches.
Each technological age has been marked by a shift in how the industrial platform enables companies to rethink their business processes and create wealth. In the talk I argue that we are limiting our view of what this next industrial/digital age can offer because of how we read, measure and through that perceive the world (how we cherry pick data). Companies are locked in metrics and quantitative measures, data that can fit into a spreadsheet. And by that they see the digital transformation merely as an efficiency tool to the fossil fuel age. But we need to stretch further…
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your BusinessBarry Feldman
How can a digital marketing consultant help your business? In this resource we'll count the ways. 24 additional marketing resources are bundled for free.
On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological SpacesIJMER
The purpose of this paper is to establish and derive the theorems which exhibit the
characterization of nano rgb-closed sets in nano topological space and obtain some of their interesting
properties. We also use this notion to consider new weak form of continuities with these sets.
2010 AMS classification: 54A05, 54C10.
In this paper, we define and study about a new type of generalized closed set called, 𝑔∗s-closed set.Its relationship with already defined generalized closed sets are also studied.
MA500-2: Topological Structures 2016
Aisling McCluskey, Daron Anderson
[email protected], [email protected]
Contents
0 Preliminaries 2
1 Topological Groups 8
2 Morphisms and Isomorphisms 15
3 The Second Isomorphism Theorem 27
4 Topological Vector Spaces 42
5 The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem 43
6 The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem 44
7 Tychonoff ’s Theorem if Time Permits 45
Continuous assessment 30%; final examination 70%. There will be a weekly
workshop led by Daron during which there will be an opportunity to boost
continuous assessment marks based upon workshop participation as outlined in
class.
This module is self-contained; the notes provided shall form the module text.
Due to the broad range of topics introduced, there is no recommended text.
However General Topology by R. Engelking is a graduate-level text which has
relevant sections within it. Also Undergraduate Topology: a working textbook by
McCluskey and McMaster is a useful revision text. As usual, in-class discussion
will supplement the formal notes.
1
0 PRELIMINARIES
0 Preliminaries
Reminder 0.1. A topology τ on the set X is a family of subsets of X, called
the τ-open sets, satisfying the three axioms.
(1) Both sets X and ∅ are τ-open
(2) The union of any subfamily is again a τ-open set
(3) The intersection of any two τ-open sets is again a τ-open set
We refer to (X,τ) as a topological space. Where there is no danger of ambi-
guity, we suppress reference to the symbol denoting the topology (in this case,
τ) and simply refer to X as a topological space and to the elements of τ as its
open sets. By a closed set we mean one whose complement is open.
Reminder 0.2. A metric on the set X is a function d: X×X → R satisfying
the five axioms.
(1) d(x,y) ≥ 0 for all x,y ∈ X
(2) d(x,y) = d(y,x) for x,y ∈ X
(3) d(x,x) = 0 for every x ∈ X
(4) d(x,y) = 0 implies x = y
(5) d(x,z) ≤ d(x,y) + d(y,z) for all x,y,z ∈ X
Axiom (5) is often called the triangle inequality.
Definition 0.3. If d′ : X × X → R satisfies axioms (1), (2), (3) and (5) but
maybe not (4) then we call it a pseudo-metric.
Reminder 0.4. Every metric on X induces a topology on X, called the metric
topology. We define an open ball to be a set of the form
B(x,r) = {y ∈ X : d(x,y) < r}
for any x ∈ X and r > 0. Then a subset G of X is defined to be open (wrt the
metric topology) if for each x ∈ G, there is r > 0 such that B(x,r) ⊂ G. Thus
open sets are arbitrary unions of open balls.
Topological Structures 2016 2 Version 0.15
0 PRELIMINARIES
The definition of the metric topology makes just as much sense when we are
working with a pseudo-metric. Open balls are defined in the same manner, and
the open sets are exactly the unions of open balls. Pseudo-metric topologies are
often neglected because they do not have the nice property of being Hausdorff.
Reminder 0.5. Suppose f : X → Y is a function between the topological
spaces X and Y . We say f is continuous to mean that whenever U is open in
Y ...
Rough set theory is a powerful tool to analysis the uncertain and imprecise problem in information systems. Also the soft set and lattice theory can be used as a general mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. In this paper, we present a new concept, soft rough lattice where the lower and upper approximations are the sub lattices and narrate some properties of soft rough lattice with some examples. Payoja Mohanty "Soft Lattice in Approximation Space" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-6 , October 2022, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd52246.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/52246/soft-lattice-in-approximation-space/payoja-mohanty
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of ContinuityIJERA Editor
In this paper, we introduce and study the notion of Zα-open sets and some properties of this class of sets are investigated. Also, we introduce the class of A *L-sets via Zα-open sets. Further, by using these sets, a new decompositions of continuous functions are presented. (2000) AMS Subject Classifications: 54D10; 54C05; 54C08.
If X be a topological space and A subspace of X, then a point x E X is said to be a cluster point of A if every open ball centered at x contains at least one point of A different from X. In the preliminary sections, review of the interior of the set X was discussed before the major work of section three was implemented.
Continuous functions play a dominant role in analysis and homotopy theory. They
have applications to image processing, signal processing, information, statistics,
engineering and technology. Recently topologists studied the continuous like functions
between two different topological structures. For example, semi continuity between a
topological structure, α-continuity between a topology and an α-topology.
Nithyanantha Jothi and Thangavelu introduced the concept of binary topology in
2011. Recently the authors extended the notion of binary topology to n-ary topology
where n˃1 an integer. In this paper continuous like functions are defined between a
topological and an n-ary topological structures and their basic properties are
studied.
In this paper we introduce the concept of connectedness in fuzzy rough topological spaces.
We also investigate some properties of connectedness in fuzzy rough topological spaces.
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Congruence Lattices of Isoform LatticesIOSR Journals
A congruence of a lattice L is said to be isoform, if any two congruence classes of are isomorphic as lattices. The lattice L is said to be isoform, if all congruence's of L are isoform. We prove that every finite distributive lattice D can be represented as the congruence lattice of a finite isoform lattice.
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functionsinventionjournals
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of computer science and electronics. IJMSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Mathematics and Statistics, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
On Fuzzy - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...IOSR Journals
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to introduce the concept of fuzzy - semi open and fuzzy - semi closed sets of a fuzzy topological space. Some characterizations are discussed, examples are given and properties are established. Also, we define fuzzy - semi interior and fuzzy - semi closure operators. And we introduce fuzzy
- t-set, -SO extremely disconnected space analyse the relations between them.
MSC 2010: 54A40, 03E72.
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian MotionIJMERJOURNAL
ABSTRACT: This study researches a representation of set indexed Brownian motion { : } X X A A A via orthonormal basis, based on reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The RKHS associated with the set indexed Brownian motion X is a Hilbert space of real-valued functions on T that is naturally isometric to 2 L ( ) A . The isometry between these Hilbert spaces leads to useful spectral representations of the set indexed Brownian motion, notably the Karhunen-Loève (KL) representation: [ ] X e E X e A n A n where { }n e is an orthonormal sequence of centered Gaussian variables. In addition, we present two special cases of a representation of a set indexed Brownian motion, when ([0,1] ) d A A and A = A( ) Ls .
Similar to International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) (20)
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
1. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759
www.ijmsi.org Volume 1 Issue 1 ǁ August. 2013ǁ PP-31-37
On Nano Forms Of Weakly Open Sets
M. Lellis Thivagar , Carmel Richard
1
1
2
School of Mathematics, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-625021, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Mathematics, Lady Doak College, Madurai - 625 002, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT : The purpose of this paper is to define and study certain weak forms of nano-open sets namely,
nano -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets. Various forms of nano -open sets and nano
semi-open sets corresponding to different cases of approximations are also derived.
KEYWORDS: Nanotopology,nano-open sets,nano interior, nano closure, nano -open sets, nano semi-open
sets, nano pre-open sets, nano regular open sets.
2010 AMS Subject Classification:54B05
I.
INTRODUCTION
Njastad [5], Levine [2] and Mashhour et al [3] respectively introduced the notions of - open,
semi-open and pre-open sets.Since then these concepts have been widelyinvestigated. It was made clear that
each -open set is semi-open and pre-open but the converse of each is not true. Njastad has shown that the
family of - open sets is a topology on X satisfying . The families SO(X, ) of all semi–open
sets and PO(X, ) of all preopen sets in (X, )are not topologies. It was proved that both SO(X, ) and
PO(X, ) are closed under arbitrary unions but not under finite intersection. Lellis Thivagar et al [1]
introduced a nano topological space with respect to a subset X of an universe which is defined in terms of lower
and upper approximations of X. The elements of a nano topological space are called the nano-open sets. He has
also studied nano closure and nano interior of a set. In this paper certain weak forms of nano-open sets such as
nano -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets are established. Various forms of nano open sets and nano semi-open sets under various cases of approximations sre also derived. A brief study of nano
regular open sets is also made.
II.
PRELIMINARIES
Definition 2.1 A subset A of a space ( X , ) is called
(i) semi-open [2] if A Cl ( Int ( A )) .
(ii) pre open [3] if A Int ( Cl ( A )) .
(iii) -open [4] if A Int ( Cl ( Int ( A ))) .
(iv) regular open [4] if A = Int ( Cl ( A )) .
Definition 2.2 [6] Let U be a non-empty finite set of objects called the universe and R be an equivalence
relation on U named as the indiscernibility relation. Elements belonging to the same equivalence class are said
to be indiscernible with one another. The pair ( U , R ) is said to be the approximation space. Let X U .
(i) The lower approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be for certain classified as
X with respect to R and its is denoted by L R ( X ) . That is, L R ( X ) =
{R ( x) : R ( x)
X } , where R(x)
xU
denotes the equivalence class determined by x.
(ii) The upper approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be possibly classified as
X with respect to R and it is denoted by U R ( X ) . That is, U R ( X ) =
{R ( x) : R ( x)
X }
xU
(iii) The boundary region of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be classified neither as X nor
www.ijmsi.org
31 | P a g e
2. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
as not-X with respect to R and it is denoted by B R ( X ) . That is, B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) L R ( X ) .
Property 2.3 [6] If ( U , R) is an approximation space and X, Y U , then
(i)
LR ( X ) X U
(ii)
L R ( ) = U
R
R
(X ) .
( ) = and L R ( U ) = U
R
(U ) = U
(iii) U R ( X Y ) = U R ( X ) U R ( Y )
(iv) U R ( X Y ) U R ( X ) U R ( Y )
(v)
L R ( X Y ) L R ( X ) L R (Y )
(vi) L R ( X Y ) = L R ( X ) L R ( Y )
(vii) L R ( X ) L R ( Y ) and U R ( X ) U R ( Y ) whenever X Y
c
(viii) U R ( X ) = [ L R ( X )]
c
c
and L R ( X ) = [U R ( X )]
c
(ix) U R U R ( X ) = L R U R ( X ) = U R ( X )
(x) L R L R ( X ) = U R L R ( X ) = L R ( X )
Definition
2.4
[1] :
Let
U
be
the
universe,
R
be
an equivalence
relation
on
U
and
R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} where X U . Then by propetry 2.3, R ( X ) satisfies the
following axioms:
(i) U and R ( X ) .
(ii) The union of the elements of any subcollection of R ( X ) is in R ( X ) .
(iii) The intersection of the elements of any finite subcollection of R ( X ) is in R ( X ) .
That is, R ( X ) is a topology on U called the nanotopology on U with respect to X. We call (U , R ( X ) ) as
the nanotopological space. The elements of R ( X ) are called as nano-open sets.
Remark 2.5 [1] If R ( X ) is the nano topology on U with respect to X, then the set B =
{ U , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} is the basis for R ( X ) .
Definition 2.6 [1] If ( U , R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X U and if
A U , then the nano interior of A is defined as the union of all nano-open subsets of A and it is denoted by
N Int(A). That is, N Int(A) is the largest nano-open subset of A. The nano closure of A is defined as the
intersection of all nano closed sets containing A and it is denoted by N Cl(A). That is, N Cl(A) is the smallest
nano closed set containing A.
Definition 2.7 [1] A nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) is said to be extremally disconnected, if the nano
closure of each nano-open set is nano-open.
III.
NANO OPEN SETS
Throughout this paper ( U , R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X U, R is an
equivalence relation on U , U / R denotes the family of equivalence classes of U by R.
Definition 3.1 Let ( U , R ( X )) be a nano topological space and A U . Then A is said to be
(i) nano semi-open if A N Cl ( N Int ( A ))
(ii) nano pre-open if A N Int ( N Cl ( A ))
(iii) nano -open if A N Int ( NCl ( NInt ( A ))
NSO( U , X ), NPO ( U ,X) and R (X) respectively denote the families of all nano semi-open, nano pre-open
www.ijmsi.org
32 | P a g e
3. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
and nano -open subsets of U .
Definition 3.2 Let ( U , R ( X )) be a nanotopological space and A U . A is said to be nano -closed
(respectively, nano semi- closed, nano pre-closed), if its complement is nano -open (nano semi-open, nano
pre-open).
Example 3.3 Let U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then the nano topology,
R ( X ) = { U , , { a }, { a , b , d }, { b , d }} . The nano closed sets are U , , { b , c , d }, { c } and { a , c } . Then,
N SO ( U , X ) = {U , , { a }, { a , c }, { a , b , d }, { b , c , d }} , N PO ( U , X ) = {U , , { a }, { b }, { d }, { a , b }
,
{ a , d } , { b , d }, { a , b , c }, { a , b , d }, { a , c , d }} and R ( X ) = {U , , { a }, { b , d }, { a , b , d }} . We note
that, N SO ( U , X ) does not form a topology on U , since { a , c } and { b , c , d } N SO ( U , X ) but
{ a , c } { b , c , d } = { c } N SO ( U , X ) . Similarly, N PO ( U , X ) is not a topology on U , since
{ a , b , c } { a , c , d } = { a , c } N PO ( U , X ) , even though { a , b , c } and { a , c , d } N PO ( U , X ) . But
the sets of R ( X ) form a topology on U . Also, we note that { a , c } N SO ( U , X ) but is not in
N PO ( U , X ) and { a , b } N PO ( U , X ) but does not belong to N SO ( U , X ) . That is, N SO ( U , X ) and
N PO ( U , X ) are independent.
Theorem 3.4 If A is nano-open in ( U , R ( X )) , then it is nano -open in U .
Proof: Since A is nano-open in U , N IntA = A . Then N Cl ( N IntA ) = N Cl ( A ) A . That is
A N Cl ( N IntA ) . Therefore, N Int ( A ) N Int
( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is,
A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, A is nano -open.
Theorem 3.5 R ( X ) N SO ( U , X ) in a nano topological spce ( U , R ( X )) .
Proof: If A R ( X ) , A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A N SO ( U , X ) .
Remark 3.6 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, {a,c} and {b,c,d} and nano semiopen but are not nano -open in U .
Theorem 3.7 R ( X ) N PO ( U , X ) in a nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) .
Proof: If A R ( X ) , A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Since N Int ( A ) A ,
N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . That is, A N Int
( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore, A N PO ( U , X ) .
That is, R ( X ) N PO ( U , X ) .
Remark 3.8 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, the set {b} is nano pre-open but is
not nano -open in U .
Theorem 3.9 R ( X ) = N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X ) .
Proof: If A R ( X ) , then A N SO ( U , X ) and A N PO ( U , X ) by theorems 3.5 and 3.7 and hence
A N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X ) . That is R ( X ) N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X ) . Conversely, if
A N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X ) , then A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and A N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore,
N Int ( N Cl ( A )) N Int ( N Cl ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) = N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is,
N Int ( N Cl ( A )) N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) . Also A N Int
( N Cl ( A )) N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))
implies that A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is, A R ( X ) . Thus,
N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X )
R
( X ) . Therefore,
R
( X ) = N SO ( U , X ) N PO ( U , X ) .
www.ijmsi.org
33 | P a g e
4. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
Theorem 3.10 : If, in a nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) , L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , then U , ,
L R ( X )(= U
R
( X )) and any set A L R ( X ) are the only nano- -open sets.in U .
Proof: Since L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , the nano topology, R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X )} . Since any nano-open
set is nano- -open, U , and L R ( X ) are nano -open in U . If A L R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) = , since
is the only nano-open subset of A. Therefore N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = and hence A is not nano -open. If
A L R ( X ) , L R ( X ) is the largest nano-open subset of A and hence, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =
N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = N Int ( B R ( X ) ) = N Int ( U ) , since B R ( X ) = . Therefore,
C
N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = U and hence, A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is nano -open. Thus
U
, , L R ( X ) and any set A L R ( X ) are the only nano -open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) .
Theorem 3.11 : U , , U R ( X ) and any set A U R ( X ) are the only nano -open sets in a nanotopological space ( U , R ( X )) if L R ( X ) = .
Proof: Since L R ( X ) = , B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) . Therefore, R ( X ) = { U , , U R ( X )} and the members of
R ( X ) are nano -open in U . Let A U R ( X ) . Then N Int ( A ) = and hence
N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = . Therefore A is not nano open
in U . If A U R ( X ) , then U R ( X ) is the
largest nano-open subsetof A (unless, U R ( X ) = U , in case of which U and are the only nano-open sets in
U
). Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl (U R ( X ) )
= N Int ( U ) and hence
A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, any set A U R ( X ) is nano -open in U . Hence, U , , U R ( X )
and any superset of U R ( X ) are the only nano -open sets in U
Theorem 3.12 : If U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X ) , in a nano topological space (U , R ( X )) , then
U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano -open sets in U .
Proof: Since U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X ) , the nano-open sets in U are U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and
hence they are nano -open also. If A = ,then A is nano -open. Therefore, let A . When
A L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) = , since the largest open subset of A is and hence
A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) , unless A is . That is, A is not nano -open in U . When L R ( X ) A ,
N Int ( A ) = L R ( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X )))
C
= N Int ( B R ( X ) )
= N Int ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) A . That is, A N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is not nano -open
in U . Similarly, it can be shown that any set A B R ( X ) and A B R ( X ) are not nano -open in U . If
A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) = and hence A is not nano open in U . Hence, U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano -open sets in U when U R ( X ) = U and
LR ( X ) .
Corollary 3.13 : R ( X ) = R ( X ) , if U R ( X ) = U .
Theorem 3.14 : Let L R ( X ) U R ( X ) where L R ( X ) and U R ( X ) U in a nano topological space
( U , R ( X )) . Then U , , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , U R ( X ) and any set A U
sets in
U
R
( X ) are the only nano -open
.
Proof: The nano topology on U is given by R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X ), B R ( X ) , U R ( X )} and hence U , ,
L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) and U R ( X ) are nano -open in U . Let A U such that A U
www.ijmsi.org
R
( X ) . Then
34 | P a g e
5. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
N Int ( A ) = U
R
( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl (U
R
( X ))) = N Int ( U ) = U . Hence, A N Int ( N Cl
( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, any A U R ( X ) is nano -open in U . When A L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) = and
hence N ( Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = . Therefore, A is not nano -open in U . When A B R ( X ) ,
N Int ( A ) = and hence A is not nano -open in U . When A U R ( X ) such that A is neither a subset of
L R ( X ) nor a subset of B R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) = and hence A is not nano -open in U . Thus,
U , , L R ( X ), B R ( X ), U
IV.
R
( X ) and any set A U
R
( X ) are the only nano -open sets in U .
FORMS OF NANO SEMI-OPEN SETS AND NANO REGULAR OPEN SETS
In this section, we derive forms of nano semi-open sets and nano regular open sets depending on various
combinations of approximations.
Remark 4.1 U , are obviously nano semi-open, since N Cl ( N Int ( U )) = U and N Cl ( N Int ( )) =
Theorem 4.2 If, in a nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) , U R ( X ) = L R ( X ) , then and sets A such that
A L R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open subsets of U
Proof: R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X )} . is obviously nano semi-open. If A is a non- empty subset of U and
A L R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( ) = . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open, if A L R ( X ) . If
A LR ( X ) ,
then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = U ,
since
LR ( X ) = U
R
(X ) .
Therefore,
A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is nano semi-open. Thus and sets containing L R ( X ) are the only nano
semi-open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) .
Theorem 4.3 If L R ( X ) = and U R ( X ) U , then only those sets contianing U R ( X ) are the nano semiopen sets in U .
Proof: R ( X ) = { U , , U R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If
A U
R
( X ) , then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( ) = and hence A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U .
If A U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (U R ( X )) = U and hence A N Cl ( N Int ( U )) . Therefore, A
is nano semi-open in U . Thus, only the sets A such that A U R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U .
Theorem 4.4 If U R ( X ) = U is a nano topological space, then U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only
nano semi-open sets in U .
Proof: R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If A L R ( X ) , then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) =
and
hence
A
is
not
nano
semi-open
in
U
.
If
A = LR ( X ) ,
then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) and hence, A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is nano semi-
open
in
U
.
If
A LR ( X ) ,
then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) .
Therefore,
A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A B R ( X ) , N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = and
hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X ) and
hence
A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) .
Therefore,
A is nano semi-open in
U
. If
A BR (X ) ,
then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X ) A and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A has atleast
one element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( ) = and hence
A is not nano semi-open in U . Thus, U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U , if
U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X ) . If L R ( X ) = , U and are the only nano semi-open sets in U , since U
www.ijmsi.org
35 | P a g e
6. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
and are the only sets in U which are nano-open and nano-closed.
Theorem 4.5 If L R ( X ) U R ( X ) where L R ( X ) and U R ( X ) U , then U , , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) ,
C
sets containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X ) B and B R ( X ) B where B (U R ( X )) are the only nano semiopen sets in U .
Proof: R ( X ) = { U , , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty, proper subset of U . If
A L R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) = and hence, N cl ( N int ( A )) = . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U .
C
If A = L R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) [U R ( X )] and hence
A N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, L R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . If A B R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) = and
hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X )
[U
R
( X )]
C
and hence A N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, B R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . Since L R ( X )
and B R ( X ) are nano semi-open, L R ( X ) B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) is also nano semi-open in U . Let
A U
R
( X ) such that A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) . Then N int ( A ) = or
L R ( X ) or B R ( X ) and consequently, N cl ( N int ( A )) = or L R ( X ) [U R ( X )]
B R ( X ) [U
A U
R
R
( X )]
C
C
or
and hence A ÚN cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U . If
( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl (U
R
( X )) = U and hence A N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is
nano semi-open. If A has a single element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and atleast one element of
[U R ( X )]
C
, then N int ( A ) = . Then, N cl ( N int ( A )) = and hence A is not nano semi-open in U .
C
Similarly, when A has a single element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] , or a single element
C
of B R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] then N cl ( N int ( A )) = and hence A is not nano semiC
open in U . When A = L R ( X ) B where B [U R ( X )] , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) =
L R ( X ) [U
B (U
R
( X ))
R
C
( X )]
C
A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . Similarly, if A = B R ( X ) B where
, then N cl ( N int ( A )) = B R ( X ) [U R ( X )]
C
A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U .
Thus, U , , L R ( X ) , U R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , any set containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X ) B and B R ( X ) B
where B [U R ( X )]
C
are the only nano semi-open sets in U .
Theorem 4.6 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A B is also nano semi-open in U . Proof: If A
and B are nano semi-open in U , then A N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and B N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Consider
A B N Cl ( N Int ( A )) N Cl ( N Int ( B )) = N Cl ( N Int ( A ) N Int ( B )) N Cl ( N Int ( A B )) and
hence A B is nano semi-open.
Remark 4.7 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A B is not nano semi-open in U . For example, let
U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then R ( X ) = { U , , { a }, { a , b , d },
{ b , d }} . The nano semi-open sets in U are U , , { a } , { a , c } , { b , d } , { a , b , d } , { b , c , d } . If A = { a , c }
and B = { b , c , d } , then A and B are nano semi-open but A B = { c } is not nano semi-open in U .
Definition 4.8 A subset A of a nano topological space (U , R ( X )) is nano-regular open in U, if
N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A .
Example 4.9 Let U = { x , y , z } and U / R = {{ x }, { y , z }} . Let X = { x , z } . Then the nano topology on U
with respect to X is given by R ( X ) = {U , , { x }, { y , z }} . The nano closed sets are U , , { y , z }, { x } . Also,
N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A for A = U , , { x } and { y , z } and hence these sets are nano regular open in U.
www.ijmsi.org
36 | P a g e
7. On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
Theorem 4.10 Any nano regular open set is nano-open.
Proof: If A is nano regular open in (U , R ( X )), A = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Then N Int ( A ) = N Int ( N Int ( N Cl
( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = A . That is, A nano-open in U.
Remark 4.11 The converse of the above theorem is not true. For example, let U = { a , b , c , d , e } with
U / R = {{ a , b }, { c , e }, { d }} . Let X = { a , d } . Then R ( X ) = { U , , { d }, { a , b , d }, { a , b }} and the nano
closed sets are U , , { a , b , c , e }, { c , e }, { c , d , e } . The nano regula open sets are U , , { d } and {a,b}. Thus,
we note that {a,b,d} is nano-open but is not nano regular open. Also, we note that the nano regular open sets do
not form a topology, since { d } { a , b } = { a , b , d } is not nano regular open, even though {d} and {a,b} are
nano regular.
Theorem 4.12 In a nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) ,if L R ( X ) U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular
open sets are U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) .
Proof: The only nano-open sets ( U , R ( X )) are U , , L R ( X ), U R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and hence the only nano
closed sets in U are U , , [ L R ( X )] , [U R ( X )] and [ B R ( X )]
C
C
LR (X
) and L R ( X ) L R ( X
C
C
C
which are respectively U , , U R ( X
C
),
).
C
C
Case 1: Let A = L R ( X ) .Then N CL ( A ) = [ B R ( X )] . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ B R ( X )]
= [N Cl ( B R ( X ))]
C
C
= [( L R ( X )) ]
C
= L R ( X ) = A . Therefore, A = L R ( X ) is nano-regular open.
C
C
Case 2: Let A = B R ( X ) . Then N Cl ( A ) = [ L R ( X )] , Then N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ L R ( X )] =
[N Cl ( L R ( X ))]
C
C
= [[ B R ( X )] ]
C
= B R ( X ) = A . That is, A = B R ( X ) is nano regular open.
Case 3: If A = U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( A ) = U . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int (U ) = U A . That is,
A =U
R
( X ) is not nano regular open unless U R ( X ) = U .
Case 4: Since N Int ( N Cl (U )) = U and N Int ( N Cl ( )) = , U and are nano regular open. Also any nano
regular open set is nano-open. Thus, U , , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano regular open sets .
Theorem 4.13 : In a nano topological space ( U , R ( X )) ,if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular
open sets are U and .
Proof: The nano- open sets in U are U ,
and L R ( X ) And N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = U L R ( X )
Therefore, L R ( X ) is not nano regular open. Thus, the only nano regular open sets are U and .
Corollary: If A and B are two nano regular open sets in a nano topological space, then A B is also nano
regular open.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
M.Lellis Thivagar and Carmel Richard, Note on nano topological spaces,Communicated.
N. Levine, Semi–open sets and semicontinuity in topological spaces, Amer.Math.Monthly 70 (1963), 36–41.
A.S. Mashhour, M.E. Abd El-Monsef and S.N. El-Deeb, On pre-topological spaces, Bull.Math. de la Soc. R.S. de Roumanie 28(76)
(1984), 39–45.
[5]
Miguel Caldas, A note on some applications of -open sets, IJMMS, 2 (2003),125-130 O. Njastad, On some classes of nearly
open sets, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 961–970.
Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, International journal of computer and Information Sciences, 11(1982),341-356.
[6]
I.L.Reilly and M.K.Vamanamurthy, On
[4]
-sets in topologicalspaces, Tamkang J.Math.,16 (1985), 7-11
www.ijmsi.org
37 | P a g e