SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759
www.ijmsi.org Volume 1 Issue 1 ǁ August. 2013ǁ PP-31-37

On Nano Forms Of Weakly Open Sets
M. Lellis Thivagar , Carmel Richard
1

1

2

School of Mathematics, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-625021, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Mathematics, Lady Doak College, Madurai - 625 002, Tamil Nadu, India

ABSTRACT : The purpose of this paper is to define and study certain weak forms of nano-open sets namely,
nano  -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets. Various forms of nano  -open sets and nano
semi-open sets corresponding to different cases of approximations are also derived.

KEYWORDS: Nanotopology,nano-open sets,nano interior, nano closure, nano  -open sets, nano semi-open
sets, nano pre-open sets, nano regular open sets.
2010 AMS Subject Classification:54B05

I.

INTRODUCTION

Njastad [5], Levine [2] and Mashhour et al [3] respectively introduced the notions of  - open,
semi-open and pre-open sets.Since then these concepts have been widelyinvestigated. It was made clear that
each  -open set is semi-open and pre-open but the converse of each is not true. Njastad has shown that the




family  of  - open sets is a topology on X satisfying    . The families SO(X,  ) of all semi–open
sets and PO(X,  ) of all preopen sets in (X,  )are not topologies. It was proved that both SO(X,  ) and
PO(X,  ) are closed under arbitrary unions but not under finite intersection. Lellis Thivagar et al [1]
introduced a nano topological space with respect to a subset X of an universe which is defined in terms of lower
and upper approximations of X. The elements of a nano topological space are called the nano-open sets. He has
also studied nano closure and nano interior of a set. In this paper certain weak forms of nano-open sets such as
nano  -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets are established. Various forms of nano  open sets and nano semi-open sets under various cases of approximations sre also derived. A brief study of nano
regular open sets is also made.

II.

PRELIMINARIES

Definition 2.1 A subset A of a space ( X ,  ) is called
(i) semi-open [2] if A  Cl ( Int ( A )) .
(ii) pre open [3] if A  Int ( Cl ( A )) .
(iii)  -open [4] if A  Int ( Cl ( Int ( A ))) .
(iv) regular open [4] if A = Int ( Cl ( A )) .
Definition 2.2 [6] Let U be a non-empty finite set of objects called the universe and R be an equivalence
relation on U named as the indiscernibility relation. Elements belonging to the same equivalence class are said
to be indiscernible with one another. The pair ( U , R ) is said to be the approximation space. Let X  U .
(i) The lower approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be for certain classified as
X with respect to R and its is denoted by L R ( X ) . That is, L R ( X ) =

 {R ( x) : R ( x) 

X } , where R(x)

xU

denotes the equivalence class determined by x.
(ii) The upper approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be possibly classified as
X with respect to R and it is denoted by U R ( X ) . That is, U R ( X ) =

 {R ( x) : R ( x) 

X  }

xU

(iii) The boundary region of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be classified neither as X nor

www.ijmsi.org

31 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
as not-X with respect to R and it is denoted by B R ( X ) . That is, B R ( X ) = U R ( X )  L R ( X ) .
Property 2.3 [6] If ( U , R) is an approximation space and X, Y  U , then
(i)

LR ( X )  X  U

(ii)

L R ( ) = U

R

R

(X ) .

(  ) =  and L R ( U ) = U

R

(U ) = U

(iii) U R ( X  Y ) = U R ( X )  U R ( Y )
(iv) U R ( X  Y )  U R ( X )  U R ( Y )
(v)

L R ( X  Y )  L R ( X )  L R (Y )

(vi) L R ( X  Y ) = L R ( X )  L R ( Y )
(vii) L R ( X )  L R ( Y ) and U R ( X )  U R ( Y ) whenever X  Y
c

(viii) U R ( X ) = [ L R ( X )]

c

c

and L R ( X ) = [U R ( X )]

c

(ix) U R U R ( X ) = L R U R ( X ) = U R ( X )
(x) L R L R ( X ) = U R L R ( X ) = L R ( X )
Definition

2.4

[1] :

Let

U

be

the

universe,

R

be

an equivalence

relation

on

U

and

 R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} where X  U . Then by propetry 2.3,  R ( X ) satisfies the
following axioms:
(i) U and    R ( X ) .

(ii) The union of the elements of any subcollection of  R ( X ) is in  R ( X ) .
(iii) The intersection of the elements of any finite subcollection of  R ( X ) is in  R ( X ) .
That is,  R ( X ) is a topology on U called the nanotopology on U with respect to X. We call (U ,  R ( X ) ) as
the nanotopological space. The elements of  R ( X ) are called as nano-open sets.
Remark 2.5 [1] If  R ( X ) is the nano topology on U with respect to X, then the set B =
{ U , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} is the basis for  R ( X ) .

Definition 2.6 [1] If ( U ,  R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X  U and if
A  U , then the nano interior of A is defined as the union of all nano-open subsets of A and it is denoted by
N Int(A). That is, N Int(A) is the largest nano-open subset of A. The nano closure of A is defined as the
intersection of all nano closed sets containing A and it is denoted by N Cl(A). That is, N Cl(A) is the smallest
nano closed set containing A.

Definition 2.7 [1] A nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) is said to be extremally disconnected, if the nano
closure of each nano-open set is nano-open.

III.

NANO   OPEN SETS

Throughout this paper ( U ,  R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X  U, R is an
equivalence relation on U , U / R denotes the family of equivalence classes of U by R.
Definition 3.1 Let ( U ,  R ( X )) be a nano topological space and A  U . Then A is said to be
(i) nano semi-open if A  N Cl ( N Int ( A ))
(ii) nano pre-open if A  N Int ( N Cl ( A ))
(iii) nano  -open if A  N Int ( NCl ( NInt ( A ))

NSO( U , X ), NPO ( U ,X) and  R (X) respectively denote the families of all nano semi-open, nano pre-open

www.ijmsi.org

32 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
and nano  -open subsets of U .
Definition 3.2 Let ( U ,  R ( X )) be a nanotopological space and A  U . A is said to be nano  -closed
(respectively, nano semi- closed, nano pre-closed), if its complement is nano  -open (nano semi-open, nano
pre-open).
Example 3.3 Let U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then the nano topology,
 R ( X ) = { U ,  , { a }, { a , b , d }, { b , d }} . The nano closed sets are U ,  , { b , c , d }, { c } and { a , c } . Then,
N SO ( U , X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { a , c }, { a , b , d }, { b , c , d }} , N PO ( U , X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { b }, { d }, { a , b }

,



{ a , d } , { b , d }, { a , b , c }, { a , b , d }, { a , c , d }} and  R ( X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { b , d }, { a , b , d }} . We note

that, N SO ( U , X ) does not form a topology on U , since { a , c } and { b , c , d }  N SO ( U , X ) but
{ a , c }  { b , c , d } = { c }  N SO ( U , X ) . Similarly, N PO ( U , X ) is not a topology on U , since

{ a , b , c }  { a , c , d } = { a , c }  N PO ( U , X ) , even though { a , b , c } and { a , c , d }  N PO ( U , X ) . But


the sets of  R ( X ) form a topology on U . Also, we note that { a , c }  N SO ( U , X ) but is not in

N PO ( U , X ) and { a , b }  N PO ( U , X ) but does not belong to N SO ( U , X ) . That is, N SO ( U , X ) and
N PO ( U , X ) are independent.

Theorem 3.4 If A is nano-open in ( U ,  R ( X )) , then it is nano  -open in U .
Proof: Since A is nano-open in U , N IntA = A . Then N Cl ( N IntA ) = N Cl ( A )  A . That is
A  N Cl ( N IntA ) . Therefore, N Int ( A )  N Int

( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is,

A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, A is nano  -open.

Theorem 3.5  R ( X )  N SO ( U , X ) in a nano topological spce ( U ,  R ( X )) .

Proof: If A   R ( X ) , A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A  N SO ( U , X ) .

Remark 3.6 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, {a,c} and {b,c,d} and nano semiopen but are not nano  -open in U .

Theorem 3.7  R ( X )  N PO ( U , X ) in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) .


Proof: If A   R ( X ) , A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Since N Int ( A )  A ,

N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . That is, A  N Int

( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore, A  N PO ( U , X ) .



That is,  R ( X )  N PO ( U , X ) .
Remark 3.8 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, the set {b} is nano pre-open but is
not nano  -open in U .


Theorem 3.9  R ( X ) = N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) .

Proof: If A   R ( X ) , then A  N SO ( U , X ) and A  N PO ( U , X ) by theorems 3.5 and 3.7 and hence


A  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) . That is  R ( X )  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) . Conversely, if
A  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) , then A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and A  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore,
N Int ( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) = N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is,
N Int ( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) . Also A  N Int

( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))



implies that A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is, A   R ( X ) . Thus,
N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X )  


R

( X ) . Therefore, 


R

( X ) = N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) .

www.ijmsi.org

33 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
Theorem 3.10 : If, in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) , L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , then U ,  ,
L R ( X )(= U

R

( X )) and any set A  L R ( X ) are the only nano-  -open sets.in U .

Proof: Since L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , the nano topology,  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X )} . Since any nano-open
set is nano-  -open, U ,  and L R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . If A  L R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) =  , since
 is the only nano-open subset of A. Therefore N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  and hence A is not nano  -open. If
A  L R ( X ) , L R ( X ) is the largest nano-open subset of A and hence, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =
N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = N Int ( B R ( X ) ) = N Int ( U ) , since B R ( X ) =  . Therefore,
C

N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = U and hence, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is nano  -open. Thus
U

,  , L R ( X ) and any set A  L R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) .

Theorem 3.11 : U ,  , U R ( X ) and any set A  U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in a nanotopological space ( U ,  R ( X )) if L R ( X ) =  .
Proof: Since L R ( X ) =  , B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) . Therefore,  R ( X ) = { U ,  , U R ( X )} and the members of
 R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . Let A  U R ( X ) . Then N Int ( A ) =  and hence
N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  . Therefore A is not nano   open

in U . If A  U R ( X ) , then U R ( X ) is the

largest nano-open subsetof A (unless, U R ( X ) = U , in case of which U and  are the only nano-open sets in
U

). Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl (U R ( X ) )

= N Int ( U ) and hence

A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, any set A  U R ( X ) is nano  -open in U . Hence, U ,  , U R ( X )

and any superset of U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U
Theorem 3.12 : If U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   , in a nano topological space (U ,  R ( X )) , then
U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U .

Proof: Since U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   , the nano-open sets in U are U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and
hence they are nano  -open also. If A =  ,then A is nano  -open. Therefore, let A   . When
A  L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  , since the largest open subset of A is  and hence

A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) , unless A is  . That is, A is not nano  -open in U . When L R ( X )  A ,
N Int ( A ) = L R ( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X )))

C

= N Int ( B R ( X ) )

= N Int ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X )  A . That is, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is not nano  -open

in U . Similarly, it can be shown that any set A  B R ( X ) and A  B R ( X ) are not nano  -open in U . If
A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  open in U . Hence, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U when U R ( X ) = U and
LR ( X )   .

Corollary 3.13 :  R ( X ) =  R ( X ) , if U R ( X ) = U .

Theorem 3.14 : Let L R ( X )  U R ( X ) where L R ( X )   and U R ( X )  U in a nano topological space
( U ,  R ( X )) . Then U ,  , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , U R ( X ) and any set A  U

sets in

U

R

( X ) are the only nano  -open

.

Proof: The nano topology on U is given by  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X ) , U R ( X )} and hence U ,  ,
L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) and U R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . Let A  U such that A  U

www.ijmsi.org

R

( X ) . Then

34 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
N Int ( A ) = U

R

( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl (U

R

( X ))) = N Int ( U ) = U . Hence, A  N Int ( N Cl

( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, any A  U R ( X ) is nano  -open in U . When A  L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  and

hence N ( Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  . Therefore, A is not nano  -open in U . When A  B R ( X ) ,
N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  -open in U . When A  U R ( X ) such that A is neither a subset of
L R ( X ) nor a subset of B R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  -open in U . Thus,

U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X ), U

IV.

R

( X ) and any set A  U

R

( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U .

FORMS OF NANO SEMI-OPEN SETS AND NANO REGULAR OPEN SETS

In this section, we derive forms of nano semi-open sets and nano regular open sets depending on various
combinations of approximations.
Remark 4.1 U ,  are obviously nano semi-open, since N Cl ( N Int ( U )) = U and N Cl ( N Int (  )) = 
Theorem 4.2 If, in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) , U R ( X ) = L R ( X ) , then  and sets A such that
A  L R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open subsets of U

Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X )} .  is obviously nano semi-open. If A is a non- empty subset of U and
A  L R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (  ) =  . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open, if A  L R ( X ) . If
A  LR ( X ) ,

then

N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = U ,

since

LR ( X ) = U

R

(X ) .

Therefore,

A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is nano semi-open. Thus  and sets containing L R ( X ) are the only nano

semi-open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) .
Theorem 4.3 If L R ( X ) =  and U R ( X )  U , then only those sets contianing U R ( X ) are the nano semiopen sets in U .
Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , U R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If

A  U

R

( X ) , then

N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (  ) =  and hence A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U .

If A  U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (U R ( X )) = U and hence A  N Cl ( N Int ( U )) . Therefore, A
is nano semi-open in U . Thus, only the sets A such that A  U R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U .
Theorem 4.4 If U R ( X ) = U is a nano topological space, then U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only
nano semi-open sets in U .
Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If A  L R ( X ) , then
N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = 

and

hence

A

is

not

nano

semi-open

in

U

.

If

A = LR ( X ) ,

then

N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) and hence, A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is nano semi-

open

in

U

.

If

A  LR ( X ) ,

then

N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) .

Therefore,

A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A  B R ( X ) , N Cl ( N Int ( A )) =  and

hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X ) and
hence

A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) .

Therefore,

A is nano semi-open in

U

. If

A  BR (X ) ,

then

N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X )  A and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A has atleast

one element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( ) =  and hence
A is not nano semi-open in U . Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U , if
U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   . If L R ( X ) =  , U and  are the only nano semi-open sets in U , since U

www.ijmsi.org

35 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
and  are the only sets in U which are nano-open and nano-closed.
Theorem 4.5 If L R ( X )  U R ( X ) where L R ( X )   and U R ( X )  U , then U ,  , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) ,
C
sets containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X )  B and B R ( X )  B where B  (U R ( X )) are the only nano semiopen sets in U .

Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty, proper subset of U . If
A  L R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) =  and hence, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U .
C
If A = L R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X )  [U R ( X )] and hence

A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, L R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . If A  B R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) =  and

hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X ) 
[U

R

( X )]

C

and hence A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, B R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . Since L R ( X )

and B R ( X ) are nano semi-open, L R ( X )  B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) is also nano semi-open in U . Let
A  U

R

( X ) such that A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) . Then N int ( A ) =  or

L R ( X ) or B R ( X ) and consequently, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  or L R ( X )  [U R ( X )]
B R ( X )  [U

A  U

R

R

( X )]

C

C

or

and hence A ÚN cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U . If

( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl (U

R

( X )) = U and hence A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is

nano semi-open. If A has a single element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and atleast one element of
[U R ( X )]

C

, then N int ( A ) =  . Then, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U .

C
Similarly, when A has a single element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] , or a single element
C
of B R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] then N cl ( N int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semiC
open in U . When A = L R ( X )  B where B  [U R ( X )] , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) =

L R ( X )  [U

B  (U

R

( X ))

R
C

( X )]

C

 A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . Similarly, if A = B R ( X )  B where

, then N cl ( N int ( A )) = B R ( X )  [U R ( X )]

C

 A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U .

Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) , U R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , any set containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X )  B and B R ( X )  B
where B  [U R ( X )]

C

are the only nano semi-open sets in U .

Theorem 4.6 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  B is also nano semi-open in U . Proof: If A
and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and B  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Consider
A  B  N Cl ( N Int ( A ))  N Cl ( N Int ( B )) = N Cl ( N Int ( A )  N Int ( B ))  N Cl ( N Int ( A  B )) and

hence A  B is nano semi-open.
Remark 4.7 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  B is not nano semi-open in U . For example, let
U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then  R ( X ) = { U ,  , { a }, { a , b , d },
{ b , d }} . The nano semi-open sets in U are U ,  , { a } , { a , c } , { b , d } , { a , b , d } , { b , c , d } . If A = { a , c }

and B = { b , c , d } , then A and B are nano semi-open but A  B = { c } is not nano semi-open in U .
Definition 4.8 A subset A of a nano topological space (U ,  R ( X )) is nano-regular open in U, if
N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A .

Example 4.9 Let U = { x , y , z } and U / R = {{ x }, { y , z }} . Let X = { x , z } . Then the nano topology on U
with respect to X is given by  R ( X ) = {U ,  , { x }, { y , z }} . The nano closed sets are U ,  , { y , z }, { x } . Also,
N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A for A = U ,  , { x } and { y , z } and hence these sets are nano regular open in U.

www.ijmsi.org

36 | P a g e
On Nano Forms Of Weakly…
Theorem 4.10 Any nano regular open set is nano-open.
Proof: If A is nano regular open in (U ,  R ( X )), A = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Then N Int ( A ) = N Int ( N Int ( N Cl
( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = A . That is, A nano-open in U.

Remark 4.11 The converse of the above theorem is not true. For example, let U = { a , b , c , d , e } with
U / R = {{ a , b }, { c , e }, { d }} . Let X = { a , d } . Then  R ( X ) = { U ,  , { d }, { a , b , d }, { a , b }} and the nano

closed sets are U ,  , { a , b , c , e }, { c , e }, { c , d , e } . The nano regula open sets are U ,  , { d } and {a,b}. Thus,
we note that {a,b,d} is nano-open but is not nano regular open. Also, we note that the nano regular open sets do
not form a topology, since { d }  { a , b } = { a , b , d } is not nano regular open, even though {d} and {a,b} are
nano regular.
Theorem 4.12 In a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) ,if L R ( X )  U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular
open sets are U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) .
Proof: The only nano-open sets ( U ,  R ( X )) are U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and hence the only nano
closed sets in U are U ,  , [ L R ( X )] , [U R ( X )] and [ B R ( X )]
C

C

LR (X

) and L R ( X )  L R ( X

C

C

C

which are respectively U ,  , U R ( X

C

),

).

C
C
Case 1: Let A = L R ( X ) .Then N CL ( A ) = [ B R ( X )] . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ B R ( X )]

= [N Cl ( B R ( X ))]

C

C

= [( L R ( X )) ]

C

= L R ( X ) = A . Therefore, A = L R ( X ) is nano-regular open.

C
C
Case 2: Let A = B R ( X ) . Then N Cl ( A ) = [ L R ( X )] , Then N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ L R ( X )] =

[N Cl ( L R ( X ))]

C

C

= [[ B R ( X )] ]

C

= B R ( X ) = A . That is, A = B R ( X ) is nano regular open.

Case 3: If A = U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( A ) = U . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int (U ) = U  A . That is,
A =U

R

( X ) is not nano regular open unless U R ( X ) = U .

Case 4: Since N Int ( N Cl (U )) = U and N Int ( N Cl (  )) =  , U and  are nano regular open. Also any nano
regular open set is nano-open. Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano regular open sets .
Theorem 4.13 : In a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) ,if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular
open sets are U and  .
Proof: The nano- open sets in U are U , 

and L R ( X ) And N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = U  L R ( X )

Therefore, L R ( X ) is not nano regular open. Thus, the only nano regular open sets are U and  .
Corollary: If A and B are two nano regular open sets in a nano topological space, then A  B is also nano
regular open.

REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]

M.Lellis Thivagar and Carmel Richard, Note on nano topological spaces,Communicated.
N. Levine, Semi–open sets and semicontinuity in topological spaces, Amer.Math.Monthly 70 (1963), 36–41.
A.S. Mashhour, M.E. Abd El-Monsef and S.N. El-Deeb, On pre-topological spaces, Bull.Math. de la Soc. R.S. de Roumanie 28(76)
(1984), 39–45.

[5]

Miguel Caldas, A note on some applications of  -open sets, IJMMS, 2 (2003),125-130 O. Njastad, On some classes of nearly
open sets, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 961–970.
Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, International journal of computer and Information Sciences, 11(1982),341-356.

[6]

I.L.Reilly and M.K.Vamanamurthy, On

[4]



-sets in topologicalspaces, Tamkang J.Math.,16 (1985), 7-11

www.ijmsi.org

37 | P a g e

More Related Content

What's hot

C026014016
C026014016C026014016
C026014016
inventionjournals
 
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaek
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaekHypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaek
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaekJun Taek Lee
 
InvolveSubmission
InvolveSubmissionInvolveSubmission
InvolveSubmissionJohn Norton
 
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
IJERA Editor
 
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 On Gr-Separation Axioms  On Gr-Separation Axioms
On Gr-Separation Axioms
IJMER
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
IJMER
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
paperpublications3
 
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed setsBetween -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
IJMER
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
inventionjournals
 
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical GeometryTim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Arun Gupta
 
New type of generalized closed sets
  New type of generalized closed sets  New type of generalized closed sets
New type of generalized closed setsAlexander Decker
 
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spacesδ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
IOSR Journals
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologybkrawat08
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
gizemk
 
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesOn some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
IJMER
 
Bd32360363
Bd32360363Bd32360363
Bd32360363
IJERA Editor
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spacesAlexander Decker
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spacesAlexander Decker
 

What's hot (19)

C026014016
C026014016C026014016
C026014016
 
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaek
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaekHypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaek
HypergroupsAssociationSchemes_leejuntaek
 
InvolveSubmission
InvolveSubmissionInvolveSubmission
InvolveSubmission
 
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
An Overview of Separation Axioms by Nearly Open Sets in Topology.
 
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 On Gr-Separation Axioms  On Gr-Separation Axioms
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
 
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed setsBetween -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
Between -I-closed sets and g-closed sets
 
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
 
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical GeometryTim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
Tim Maudlin: New Foundations for Physical Geometry
 
New type of generalized closed sets
  New type of generalized closed sets  New type of generalized closed sets
New type of generalized closed sets
 
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spacesδ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
 
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesOn some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
 
Bd32360363
Bd32360363Bd32360363
Bd32360363
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 

Viewers also liked

Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
maditabalnco
 
What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016
Andrew Chen
 
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post FormatsThe Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
Barry Feldman
 
The Outcome Economy
The Outcome EconomyThe Outcome Economy
The Outcome Economy
Helge Tennø
 
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
Barry Feldman
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Metabolic syndrome 2
Metabolic syndrome 2Metabolic syndrome 2
Metabolic syndrome 2
 
Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
Reuters: Pictures of the Year 2016 (Part 2)
 
What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016What's Next in Growth? 2016
What's Next in Growth? 2016
 
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post FormatsThe Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
The Six Highest Performing B2B Blog Post Formats
 
The Outcome Economy
The Outcome EconomyThe Outcome Economy
The Outcome Economy
 
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
32 Ways a Digital Marketing Consultant Can Help Grow Your Business
 

Similar to International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)

On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological SpacesOn Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
IJMER
 
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
IRJET-  	  Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological SpacesIRJET-  	  Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
IRJET Journal
 
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
IJMER
 
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological SpacesSome Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
IJERA Editor
 
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docxMA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
smile790243
 
Soft Lattice in Approximation Space
Soft Lattice in Approximation SpaceSoft Lattice in Approximation Space
Soft Lattice in Approximation Space
ijtsrd
 
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of ContinuityOn Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
IJERA Editor
 
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological SpaceOn Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
BRNSS Publication Hub
 
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACESCONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
IAEME Publication
 
Db31463471
Db31463471Db31463471
Db31463471IJMER
 
FUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACES
FUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACESFUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACES
E025036043
E025036043E025036043
E025036043
inventionjournals
 
Congruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
Congruence Lattices of Isoform LatticesCongruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
Congruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
IOSR Journals
 
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute FunctionsTotally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
inventionjournals
 
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
IJMER
 
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
IOSR Journals
 
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian MotionReproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
IJMERJOURNAL
 

Similar to International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) (20)

On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological SpacesOn Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
On Characterizations of NANO RGB-Closed Sets in NANO Topological Spaces
 
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
IRJET-  	  Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological SpacesIRJET-  	  Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
 
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
 
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological SpacesSome Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
 
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docxMA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
 
Soft Lattice in Approximation Space
Soft Lattice in Approximation SpaceSoft Lattice in Approximation Space
Soft Lattice in Approximation Space
 
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of ContinuityOn Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
On Zα-Open Sets and Decompositions of Continuity
 
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological SpaceOn Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
On Review of the Cluster Point of a Set in a Topological Space
 
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACESCONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
 
Db31463471
Db31463471Db31463471
Db31463471
 
50120140504018
5012014050401850120140504018
50120140504018
 
FUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACES
FUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACESFUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACES
FUZZY ROUGH CONNECTED SPACES
 
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
 
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
 
E025036043
E025036043E025036043
E025036043
 
Congruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
Congruence Lattices of Isoform LatticesCongruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
Congruence Lattices of Isoform Lattices
 
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute FunctionsTotally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
 
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
 
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
On Fuzzy  - Semi Open Sets and Fuzzy  - Semi Closed Sets in Fuzzy Topologic...
 
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian MotionReproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space of A Set Indexed Brownian Motion
 

Recently uploaded

Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and backKnowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Elena Simperl
 
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Frank van Harmelen
 
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdfLeading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
OnBoard
 
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualitySoftware Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Inflectra
 
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
BookNet Canada
 
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewState of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
Prayukth K V
 
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
Thierry Lestable
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
DianaGray10
 
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
Product School
 
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User GroupODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
CatarinaPereira64715
 
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonConnector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
DianaGray10
 
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyesAssuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
ThousandEyes
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
DanBrown980551
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
Jemma Hussein Allen
 
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMsTo Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
Paul Groth
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance
 
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
Product School
 
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
UiPathCommunity
 
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
Sri Ambati
 
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
Elena Simperl
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and backKnowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
 
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
 
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdfLeading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
Leading Change strategies and insights for effective change management pdf 1.pdf
 
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualitySoftware Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
 
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...
 
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewState of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview
 
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4
 
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
 
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User GroupODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
ODC, Data Fabric and Architecture User Group
 
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonConnector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a button
 
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyesAssuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
 
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMsTo Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
 
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...
 
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
 
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
 
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
 

International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)

  • 1. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759 www.ijmsi.org Volume 1 Issue 1 ǁ August. 2013ǁ PP-31-37 On Nano Forms Of Weakly Open Sets M. Lellis Thivagar , Carmel Richard 1 1 2 School of Mathematics, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-625021, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Department of Mathematics, Lady Doak College, Madurai - 625 002, Tamil Nadu, India ABSTRACT : The purpose of this paper is to define and study certain weak forms of nano-open sets namely, nano  -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets. Various forms of nano  -open sets and nano semi-open sets corresponding to different cases of approximations are also derived. KEYWORDS: Nanotopology,nano-open sets,nano interior, nano closure, nano  -open sets, nano semi-open sets, nano pre-open sets, nano regular open sets. 2010 AMS Subject Classification:54B05 I. INTRODUCTION Njastad [5], Levine [2] and Mashhour et al [3] respectively introduced the notions of  - open, semi-open and pre-open sets.Since then these concepts have been widelyinvestigated. It was made clear that each  -open set is semi-open and pre-open but the converse of each is not true. Njastad has shown that the   family  of  - open sets is a topology on X satisfying    . The families SO(X,  ) of all semi–open sets and PO(X,  ) of all preopen sets in (X,  )are not topologies. It was proved that both SO(X,  ) and PO(X,  ) are closed under arbitrary unions but not under finite intersection. Lellis Thivagar et al [1] introduced a nano topological space with respect to a subset X of an universe which is defined in terms of lower and upper approximations of X. The elements of a nano topological space are called the nano-open sets. He has also studied nano closure and nano interior of a set. In this paper certain weak forms of nano-open sets such as nano  -open sets, nano semi-open sets and nano pre-open sets are established. Various forms of nano  open sets and nano semi-open sets under various cases of approximations sre also derived. A brief study of nano regular open sets is also made. II. PRELIMINARIES Definition 2.1 A subset A of a space ( X ,  ) is called (i) semi-open [2] if A  Cl ( Int ( A )) . (ii) pre open [3] if A  Int ( Cl ( A )) . (iii)  -open [4] if A  Int ( Cl ( Int ( A ))) . (iv) regular open [4] if A = Int ( Cl ( A )) . Definition 2.2 [6] Let U be a non-empty finite set of objects called the universe and R be an equivalence relation on U named as the indiscernibility relation. Elements belonging to the same equivalence class are said to be indiscernible with one another. The pair ( U , R ) is said to be the approximation space. Let X  U . (i) The lower approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be for certain classified as X with respect to R and its is denoted by L R ( X ) . That is, L R ( X ) =  {R ( x) : R ( x)  X } , where R(x) xU denotes the equivalence class determined by x. (ii) The upper approximation of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be possibly classified as X with respect to R and it is denoted by U R ( X ) . That is, U R ( X ) =  {R ( x) : R ( x)  X  } xU (iii) The boundary region of X with respect to R is the set of all objects, which can be classified neither as X nor www.ijmsi.org 31 | P a g e
  • 2. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… as not-X with respect to R and it is denoted by B R ( X ) . That is, B R ( X ) = U R ( X )  L R ( X ) . Property 2.3 [6] If ( U , R) is an approximation space and X, Y  U , then (i) LR ( X )  X  U (ii) L R ( ) = U R R (X ) . (  ) =  and L R ( U ) = U R (U ) = U (iii) U R ( X  Y ) = U R ( X )  U R ( Y ) (iv) U R ( X  Y )  U R ( X )  U R ( Y ) (v) L R ( X  Y )  L R ( X )  L R (Y ) (vi) L R ( X  Y ) = L R ( X )  L R ( Y ) (vii) L R ( X )  L R ( Y ) and U R ( X )  U R ( Y ) whenever X  Y c (viii) U R ( X ) = [ L R ( X )] c c and L R ( X ) = [U R ( X )] c (ix) U R U R ( X ) = L R U R ( X ) = U R ( X ) (x) L R L R ( X ) = U R L R ( X ) = L R ( X ) Definition 2.4 [1] : Let U be the universe, R be an equivalence relation on U and  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} where X  U . Then by propetry 2.3,  R ( X ) satisfies the following axioms: (i) U and    R ( X ) . (ii) The union of the elements of any subcollection of  R ( X ) is in  R ( X ) . (iii) The intersection of the elements of any finite subcollection of  R ( X ) is in  R ( X ) . That is,  R ( X ) is a topology on U called the nanotopology on U with respect to X. We call (U ,  R ( X ) ) as the nanotopological space. The elements of  R ( X ) are called as nano-open sets. Remark 2.5 [1] If  R ( X ) is the nano topology on U with respect to X, then the set B = { U , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} is the basis for  R ( X ) . Definition 2.6 [1] If ( U ,  R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X  U and if A  U , then the nano interior of A is defined as the union of all nano-open subsets of A and it is denoted by N Int(A). That is, N Int(A) is the largest nano-open subset of A. The nano closure of A is defined as the intersection of all nano closed sets containing A and it is denoted by N Cl(A). That is, N Cl(A) is the smallest nano closed set containing A. Definition 2.7 [1] A nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) is said to be extremally disconnected, if the nano closure of each nano-open set is nano-open. III. NANO   OPEN SETS Throughout this paper ( U ,  R ( X )) is a nano topological space with respect to X where X  U, R is an equivalence relation on U , U / R denotes the family of equivalence classes of U by R. Definition 3.1 Let ( U ,  R ( X )) be a nano topological space and A  U . Then A is said to be (i) nano semi-open if A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) (ii) nano pre-open if A  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) (iii) nano  -open if A  N Int ( NCl ( NInt ( A ))  NSO( U , X ), NPO ( U ,X) and  R (X) respectively denote the families of all nano semi-open, nano pre-open www.ijmsi.org 32 | P a g e
  • 3. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… and nano  -open subsets of U . Definition 3.2 Let ( U ,  R ( X )) be a nanotopological space and A  U . A is said to be nano  -closed (respectively, nano semi- closed, nano pre-closed), if its complement is nano  -open (nano semi-open, nano pre-open). Example 3.3 Let U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then the nano topology,  R ( X ) = { U ,  , { a }, { a , b , d }, { b , d }} . The nano closed sets are U ,  , { b , c , d }, { c } and { a , c } . Then, N SO ( U , X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { a , c }, { a , b , d }, { b , c , d }} , N PO ( U , X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { b }, { d }, { a , b } ,  { a , d } , { b , d }, { a , b , c }, { a , b , d }, { a , c , d }} and  R ( X ) = {U ,  , { a }, { b , d }, { a , b , d }} . We note that, N SO ( U , X ) does not form a topology on U , since { a , c } and { b , c , d }  N SO ( U , X ) but { a , c }  { b , c , d } = { c }  N SO ( U , X ) . Similarly, N PO ( U , X ) is not a topology on U , since  { a , b , c }  { a , c , d } = { a , c }  N PO ( U , X ) , even though { a , b , c } and { a , c , d }  N PO ( U , X ) . But   the sets of  R ( X ) form a topology on U . Also, we note that { a , c }  N SO ( U , X ) but is not in N PO ( U , X ) and { a , b }  N PO ( U , X ) but does not belong to N SO ( U , X ) . That is, N SO ( U , X ) and N PO ( U , X ) are independent. Theorem 3.4 If A is nano-open in ( U ,  R ( X )) , then it is nano  -open in U . Proof: Since A is nano-open in U , N IntA = A . Then N Cl ( N IntA ) = N Cl ( A )  A . That is A  N Cl ( N IntA ) . Therefore, N Int ( A )  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, A is nano  -open.  Theorem 3.5  R ( X )  N SO ( U , X ) in a nano topological spce ( U ,  R ( X )) .  Proof: If A   R ( X ) , A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A  N SO ( U , X ) . Remark 3.6 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, {a,c} and {b,c,d} and nano semiopen but are not nano  -open in U .  Theorem 3.7  R ( X )  N PO ( U , X ) in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) .  Proof: If A   R ( X ) , A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Since N Int ( A )  A , N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . That is, A  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore, A  N PO ( U , X ) .  That is,  R ( X )  N PO ( U , X ) . Remark 3.8 The converse of the above theorem is not true. In example 3.3, the set {b} is nano pre-open but is not nano  -open in U .  Theorem 3.9  R ( X ) = N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) .  Proof: If A   R ( X ) , then A  N SO ( U , X ) and A  N PO ( U , X ) by theorems 3.5 and 3.7 and hence  A  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) . That is  R ( X )  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) . Conversely, if A  N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) , then A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and A  N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) = N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is, N Int ( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))) . Also A  N Int ( N Cl ( A ))  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )))  implies that A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . That is, A   R ( X ) . Thus, N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X )    R ( X ) . Therefore,   R ( X ) = N SO ( U , X )  N PO ( U , X ) . www.ijmsi.org 33 | P a g e
  • 4. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… Theorem 3.10 : If, in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) , L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , then U ,  , L R ( X )(= U R ( X )) and any set A  L R ( X ) are the only nano-  -open sets.in U . Proof: Since L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) = X , the nano topology,  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X )} . Since any nano-open set is nano-  -open, U ,  and L R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . If A  L R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) =  , since  is the only nano-open subset of A. Therefore N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  and hence A is not nano  -open. If A  L R ( X ) , L R ( X ) is the largest nano-open subset of A and hence, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = N Int ( B R ( X ) ) = N Int ( U ) , since B R ( X ) =  . Therefore, C N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = U and hence, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is nano  -open. Thus U ,  , L R ( X ) and any set A  L R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) . Theorem 3.11 : U ,  , U R ( X ) and any set A  U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in a nanotopological space ( U ,  R ( X )) if L R ( X ) =  . Proof: Since L R ( X ) =  , B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) . Therefore,  R ( X ) = { U ,  , U R ( X )} and the members of  R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . Let A  U R ( X ) . Then N Int ( A ) =  and hence N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  . Therefore A is not nano   open in U . If A  U R ( X ) , then U R ( X ) is the largest nano-open subsetof A (unless, U R ( X ) = U , in case of which U and  are the only nano-open sets in U ). Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl (U R ( X ) ) = N Int ( U ) and hence A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Thus, any set A  U R ( X ) is nano  -open in U . Hence, U ,  , U R ( X ) and any superset of U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U Theorem 3.12 : If U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   , in a nano topological space (U ,  R ( X )) , then U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U . Proof: Since U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   , the nano-open sets in U are U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and hence they are nano  -open also. If A =  ,then A is nano  -open. Therefore, let A   . When A  L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  , since the largest open subset of A is  and hence A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) , unless A is  . That is, A is not nano  -open in U . When L R ( X )  A , N Int ( A ) = L R ( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) C = N Int ( B R ( X ) ) = N Int ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X )  A . That is, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) . Therefore, A is not nano  -open in U . Similarly, it can be shown that any set A  B R ( X ) and A  B R ( X ) are not nano  -open in U . If A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) , then N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  open in U . Hence, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U when U R ( X ) = U and LR ( X )   .  Corollary 3.13 :  R ( X ) =  R ( X ) , if U R ( X ) = U . Theorem 3.14 : Let L R ( X )  U R ( X ) where L R ( X )   and U R ( X )  U in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) . Then U ,  , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , U R ( X ) and any set A  U sets in U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open . Proof: The nano topology on U is given by  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X ) , U R ( X )} and hence U ,  , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) and U R ( X ) are nano  -open in U . Let A  U such that A  U www.ijmsi.org R ( X ) . Then 34 | P a g e
  • 5. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… N Int ( A ) = U R ( X ) and therefore, N Int ( N Cl (U R ( X ))) = N Int ( U ) = U . Hence, A  N Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, any A  U R ( X ) is nano  -open in U . When A  L R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  and hence N ( Int ( N Cl ( N Int ( A ))) =  . Therefore, A is not nano  -open in U . When A  B R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  -open in U . When A  U R ( X ) such that A is neither a subset of L R ( X ) nor a subset of B R ( X ) , N Int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano  -open in U . Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X ), U IV. R ( X ) and any set A  U R ( X ) are the only nano  -open sets in U . FORMS OF NANO SEMI-OPEN SETS AND NANO REGULAR OPEN SETS In this section, we derive forms of nano semi-open sets and nano regular open sets depending on various combinations of approximations. Remark 4.1 U ,  are obviously nano semi-open, since N Cl ( N Int ( U )) = U and N Cl ( N Int (  )) =  Theorem 4.2 If, in a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) , U R ( X ) = L R ( X ) , then  and sets A such that A  L R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open subsets of U Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X )} .  is obviously nano semi-open. If A is a non- empty subset of U and A  L R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (  ) =  . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open, if A  L R ( X ) . If A  LR ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = U , since LR ( X ) = U R (X ) . Therefore, A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is nano semi-open. Thus  and sets containing L R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U , if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) . Theorem 4.3 If L R ( X ) =  and U R ( X )  U , then only those sets contianing U R ( X ) are the nano semiopen sets in U . Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , U R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If A  U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (  ) =  and hence A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U . If A  U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl (U R ( X )) = U and hence A  N Cl ( N Int ( U )) . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . Thus, only the sets A such that A  U R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U . Theorem 4.4 If U R ( X ) = U is a nano topological space, then U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U . Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty subset of U . If A  L R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = LR ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) and hence, A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is nano semi- open in U . If A  LR ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X ) . Therefore, A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A  B R ( X ) , N Cl ( N Int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X ) and hence A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . If A  BR (X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X )  A and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A has atleast one element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of B R ( X ) , then N Cl ( N Int ( A )) = N Cl ( ) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano semi-open sets in U , if U R ( X ) = U and L R ( X )   . If L R ( X ) =  , U and  are the only nano semi-open sets in U , since U www.ijmsi.org 35 | P a g e
  • 6. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… and  are the only sets in U which are nano-open and nano-closed. Theorem 4.5 If L R ( X )  U R ( X ) where L R ( X )   and U R ( X )  U , then U ,  , L R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , C sets containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X )  B and B R ( X )  B where B  (U R ( X )) are the only nano semiopen sets in U . Proof:  R ( X ) = { U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ), B R ( X )} . Let A be a non-empty, proper subset of U . If A  L R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) =  and hence, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U . C If A = L R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X )  [U R ( X )] and hence A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, L R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . If A  B R ( X ) , then N int ( A ) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . If A = B R ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( B R ( X )) = B R ( X )  [U R ( X )] C and hence A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, B R ( X ) is nano semi-open in U . Since L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are nano semi-open, L R ( X )  B R ( X ) = U R ( X ) is also nano semi-open in U . Let A  U R ( X ) such that A has atleast one element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) . Then N int ( A ) =  or L R ( X ) or B R ( X ) and consequently, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  or L R ( X )  [U R ( X )] B R ( X )  [U A  U R R ( X )] C C or and hence A ÚN cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is not nano semi-open in U . If ( X ) , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl (U R ( X )) = U and hence A  N cl ( N int ( A )) . Therefore, A is nano semi-open. If A has a single element each of L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] C , then N int ( A ) =  . Then, N cl ( N int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semi-open in U . C Similarly, when A has a single element of L R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] , or a single element C of B R ( X ) and atleast one element of [U R ( X )] then N cl ( N int ( A )) =  and hence A is not nano semiC open in U . When A = L R ( X )  B where B  [U R ( X )] , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = N cl ( L R ( X )) = L R ( X )  [U B  (U R ( X )) R C ( X )] C  A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . Similarly, if A = B R ( X )  B where , then N cl ( N int ( A )) = B R ( X )  [U R ( X )] C  A . Therefore, A is nano semi-open in U . Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) , U R ( X ) , B R ( X ) , any set containing U R ( X ) , L R ( X )  B and B R ( X )  B where B  [U R ( X )] C are the only nano semi-open sets in U . Theorem 4.6 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  B is also nano semi-open in U . Proof: If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) and B  N Cl ( N Int ( A )) . Consider A  B  N Cl ( N Int ( A ))  N Cl ( N Int ( B )) = N Cl ( N Int ( A )  N Int ( B ))  N Cl ( N Int ( A  B )) and hence A  B is nano semi-open. Remark 4.7 If A and B are nano semi-open in U , then A  B is not nano semi-open in U . For example, let U = { a , b , c , d } with U / R = {{ a }, { c }, { b , d }} and X = { a , b } . Then  R ( X ) = { U ,  , { a }, { a , b , d }, { b , d }} . The nano semi-open sets in U are U ,  , { a } , { a , c } , { b , d } , { a , b , d } , { b , c , d } . If A = { a , c } and B = { b , c , d } , then A and B are nano semi-open but A  B = { c } is not nano semi-open in U . Definition 4.8 A subset A of a nano topological space (U ,  R ( X )) is nano-regular open in U, if N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A . Example 4.9 Let U = { x , y , z } and U / R = {{ x }, { y , z }} . Let X = { x , z } . Then the nano topology on U with respect to X is given by  R ( X ) = {U ,  , { x }, { y , z }} . The nano closed sets are U ,  , { y , z }, { x } . Also, N Int (N Cl ( A )) = A for A = U ,  , { x } and { y , z } and hence these sets are nano regular open in U. www.ijmsi.org 36 | P a g e
  • 7. On Nano Forms Of Weakly… Theorem 4.10 Any nano regular open set is nano-open. Proof: If A is nano regular open in (U ,  R ( X )), A = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) . Then N Int ( A ) = N Int ( N Int ( N Cl ( A ))) = N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = A . That is, A nano-open in U. Remark 4.11 The converse of the above theorem is not true. For example, let U = { a , b , c , d , e } with U / R = {{ a , b }, { c , e }, { d }} . Let X = { a , d } . Then  R ( X ) = { U ,  , { d }, { a , b , d }, { a , b }} and the nano closed sets are U ,  , { a , b , c , e }, { c , e }, { c , d , e } . The nano regula open sets are U ,  , { d } and {a,b}. Thus, we note that {a,b,d} is nano-open but is not nano regular open. Also, we note that the nano regular open sets do not form a topology, since { d }  { a , b } = { a , b , d } is not nano regular open, even though {d} and {a,b} are nano regular. Theorem 4.12 In a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) ,if L R ( X )  U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular open sets are U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) . Proof: The only nano-open sets ( U ,  R ( X )) are U ,  , L R ( X ), U R ( X ) and B R ( X ) and hence the only nano closed sets in U are U ,  , [ L R ( X )] , [U R ( X )] and [ B R ( X )] C C LR (X ) and L R ( X )  L R ( X C C C which are respectively U ,  , U R ( X C ), ). C C Case 1: Let A = L R ( X ) .Then N CL ( A ) = [ B R ( X )] . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ B R ( X )] = [N Cl ( B R ( X ))] C C = [( L R ( X )) ] C = L R ( X ) = A . Therefore, A = L R ( X ) is nano-regular open. C C Case 2: Let A = B R ( X ) . Then N Cl ( A ) = [ L R ( X )] , Then N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int [ L R ( X )] = [N Cl ( L R ( X ))] C C = [[ B R ( X )] ] C = B R ( X ) = A . That is, A = B R ( X ) is nano regular open. Case 3: If A = U R ( X ) , then N Cl ( A ) = U . Therefore, N Int ( N Cl ( A )) = N Int (U ) = U  A . That is, A =U R ( X ) is not nano regular open unless U R ( X ) = U . Case 4: Since N Int ( N Cl (U )) = U and N Int ( N Cl (  )) =  , U and  are nano regular open. Also any nano regular open set is nano-open. Thus, U ,  , L R ( X ) and B R ( X ) are the only nano regular open sets . Theorem 4.13 : In a nano topological space ( U ,  R ( X )) ,if L R ( X ) = U R ( X ) , then the only nano regular open sets are U and  . Proof: The nano- open sets in U are U ,  and L R ( X ) And N Int ( N Cl ( L R ( X ))) = U  L R ( X ) Therefore, L R ( X ) is not nano regular open. Thus, the only nano regular open sets are U and  . Corollary: If A and B are two nano regular open sets in a nano topological space, then A  B is also nano regular open. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] M.Lellis Thivagar and Carmel Richard, Note on nano topological spaces,Communicated. N. Levine, Semi–open sets and semicontinuity in topological spaces, Amer.Math.Monthly 70 (1963), 36–41. A.S. Mashhour, M.E. Abd El-Monsef and S.N. El-Deeb, On pre-topological spaces, Bull.Math. de la Soc. R.S. de Roumanie 28(76) (1984), 39–45. [5] Miguel Caldas, A note on some applications of  -open sets, IJMMS, 2 (2003),125-130 O. Njastad, On some classes of nearly open sets, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 961–970. Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, International journal of computer and Information Sciences, 11(1982),341-356. [6] I.L.Reilly and M.K.Vamanamurthy, On [4]  -sets in topologicalspaces, Tamkang J.Math.,16 (1985), 7-11 www.ijmsi.org 37 | P a g e