Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part II)
•
0 likes•77 views
1) The document discusses Lorentz length contraction and proposes that it, along with time dilation, mass increase, and particle length, are all effects of light velocity. 2) It argues that these four phenomena must have the same underlying cause, which is the speed of light, and that particle properties should be defined relative to light speed. 3) The key conclusion is that the human realization process, light velocity, and particle data are all created relative to each other, so the human realization process can be considered the reference point for the universe.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions)
Particle Nature (Definition) depends On Light Velocity
1- Particle Nature Absolute Meaning
Special theory of relativity states that
If a particle (with length L0) travels by speed of light (approximately), it will suffer from Lorentz length contraction and be seen with a contracted length (L1)
So – the question is -
"What's happened For The Particle Own Nature?"
The theory states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light!
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
Specifically for the previous reason we should refuse the assumption that "Particle Own Nature doesn't Change" or the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"…. In fact ….Particle length is changed already
Let's consider this point with some deep analysis in following:
We deal here with the assumption "Particle length doesn’t change and the contracted length is only an imaginary vision"
How do we measure the particle length in static case (before any motion)? and how do we measure the moving particle length?
Where we use The Same Methods in both cases – practically and logically – we have to consider both results are equal in power – no result is better than the other because both are produced by the same methods of measurements..
Although I consider that –Particle in static should be considered as a special case because it moves by my velocity – means – instead to choose any other velocity the particle chooses to move by my velocity which makes it specific case for particle different motions cases
So the analysis tells us that – the particle different velocities motions is the general case and static situation (relative to me) is a special one
Spite of that
SR states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
I mean – if the theory means – the proper length will stay with particle during its motion – that means – the special case is used here as a general one – and depending on it all other parameters are created
Conclusion
(1)
Particle own length is contracted by high velocity (light velocity approximately)
Because I'm not "The Universe Reference Point" I refuse the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"
(2)
Light Velocity should be a player in Human Realization Process
Matter Creation Known Features (Analytical Study)
How the matter is created? Let's summarize the known features in following:
1- Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle length and Mass are effected (changed) with high velocity motion – which tells us that- Particle Data may be created relative to its motion.
2- Gauss Law tells us that – the net electric charges of conductor resides entirely on its surface –referring to that the matter geometrical shape is created relative to any electromagnetic field may effect on it.
3- Light reflection and refraction tell us that – the matter different types are created relative to light effects on them
4- Electric Field defines the motions direction – which tells that – the electric field was necessary for the solar planets creation to save planets motions unified direction around the sun
5- Planets Data shows That Matter Is Created Depending On A Period Of Time
6- Planets Diameters & Masses Show A Dependency On Each Other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Special Theory of Relativity Analysis (Questions and Answers) (I)
The paper provides questions and answers concern the special theory of relativity, trying to see its depth… the questions are in order as following:
Question No. 1
Is Lorentz Length Contraction A Real Phenomenon Or Illusion Of Measurements?
Question No. 2
Why Light Velocity Is Constant In All Frames?
Question No. 3
How Can Observer Effect On Observation Results?
Question No. 4
Is There A Contradiction In The Physics Book?
Question No. 5
Are There Relativistic Effects In The Solar System?
Question No. 6
Is The Solar Planets Order In Harmony With The Sun Gravity Concept?
Question No. 7
Do We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact(II)
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact?
Abstract
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Paper Basic Conclusion
-The Matter Can't Created The Universe But The Motion Can
-The Motion Is Found Before Any Matter Creation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter Origin and Creation (II)
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is A Form Of Light
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Light has different forms – for example
Light coherence (Young Experiment) produces an interference – bright fringes and dark fringes – now the input is the sun light but the output is bright and dark fringes and that can be considered a change in light nature based on our vision because the input light is different from the output
The double production experiment produces electron position from Gamma rays and this can be considered as change in light nature because the input is different from the output – the particles creation may be done because of the light velocity decreasing where the input is an electromagnetic wave travels with light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) and the output are particles move by less velocity – so may the particles are created by decreasing in the light velocity
Means – the light provides different features by different changes may be occurred for the light nature
Based on this analysis I suggest that – the matter is one form of the light different forms – and the matter is created by decreasing of the light velocity
Specifically
I suppose that – there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
And – I conclude that – the matter is created because this light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) is decreased to the light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) where the difference in energy is seen in a matter form
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part III)
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon Done For Particle Own Length And Cause To Be Contracted.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Recommended
Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions)
Particle Nature (Definition) depends On Light Velocity
1- Particle Nature Absolute Meaning
Special theory of relativity states that
If a particle (with length L0) travels by speed of light (approximately), it will suffer from Lorentz length contraction and be seen with a contracted length (L1)
So – the question is -
"What's happened For The Particle Own Nature?"
The theory states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light!
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
Specifically for the previous reason we should refuse the assumption that "Particle Own Nature doesn't Change" or the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"…. In fact ….Particle length is changed already
Let's consider this point with some deep analysis in following:
We deal here with the assumption "Particle length doesn’t change and the contracted length is only an imaginary vision"
How do we measure the particle length in static case (before any motion)? and how do we measure the moving particle length?
Where we use The Same Methods in both cases – practically and logically – we have to consider both results are equal in power – no result is better than the other because both are produced by the same methods of measurements..
Although I consider that –Particle in static should be considered as a special case because it moves by my velocity – means – instead to choose any other velocity the particle chooses to move by my velocity which makes it specific case for particle different motions cases
So the analysis tells us that – the particle different velocities motions is the general case and static situation (relative to me) is a special one
Spite of that
SR states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
I mean – if the theory means – the proper length will stay with particle during its motion – that means – the special case is used here as a general one – and depending on it all other parameters are created
Conclusion
(1)
Particle own length is contracted by high velocity (light velocity approximately)
Because I'm not "The Universe Reference Point" I refuse the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"
(2)
Light Velocity should be a player in Human Realization Process
Matter Creation Known Features (Analytical Study)
How the matter is created? Let's summarize the known features in following:
1- Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle length and Mass are effected (changed) with high velocity motion – which tells us that- Particle Data may be created relative to its motion.
2- Gauss Law tells us that – the net electric charges of conductor resides entirely on its surface –referring to that the matter geometrical shape is created relative to any electromagnetic field may effect on it.
3- Light reflection and refraction tell us that – the matter different types are created relative to light effects on them
4- Electric Field defines the motions direction – which tells that – the electric field was necessary for the solar planets creation to save planets motions unified direction around the sun
5- Planets Data shows That Matter Is Created Depending On A Period Of Time
6- Planets Diameters & Masses Show A Dependency On Each Other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Special Theory of Relativity Analysis (Questions and Answers) (I)
The paper provides questions and answers concern the special theory of relativity, trying to see its depth… the questions are in order as following:
Question No. 1
Is Lorentz Length Contraction A Real Phenomenon Or Illusion Of Measurements?
Question No. 2
Why Light Velocity Is Constant In All Frames?
Question No. 3
How Can Observer Effect On Observation Results?
Question No. 4
Is There A Contradiction In The Physics Book?
Question No. 5
Are There Relativistic Effects In The Solar System?
Question No. 6
Is The Solar Planets Order In Harmony With The Sun Gravity Concept?
Question No. 7
Do We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact(II)
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact?
Abstract
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Paper Basic Conclusion
-The Matter Can't Created The Universe But The Motion Can
-The Motion Is Found Before Any Matter Creation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter Origin and Creation (II)
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is A Form Of Light
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Light has different forms – for example
Light coherence (Young Experiment) produces an interference – bright fringes and dark fringes – now the input is the sun light but the output is bright and dark fringes and that can be considered a change in light nature based on our vision because the input light is different from the output
The double production experiment produces electron position from Gamma rays and this can be considered as change in light nature because the input is different from the output – the particles creation may be done because of the light velocity decreasing where the input is an electromagnetic wave travels with light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) and the output are particles move by less velocity – so may the particles are created by decreasing in the light velocity
Means – the light provides different features by different changes may be occurred for the light nature
Based on this analysis I suggest that – the matter is one form of the light different forms – and the matter is created by decreasing of the light velocity
Specifically
I suppose that – there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
And – I conclude that – the matter is created because this light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) is decreased to the light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) where the difference in energy is seen in a matter form
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part III)
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon Done For Particle Own Length And Cause To Be Contracted.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon & Not Illusion Of Measurements
Paper Question:
"Is Lorentz Length Contraction a real phenomenon or illusion of Measurements?"
Or …
"What's happened For Particle Own Nature, if this particle travels by high velocity?"
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that –Particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is found as illusion of measurements
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that –Particle own nature changes with high velocity motion.
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined correctly when no difference in motions velocities found between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
Specifically for the previous reason we should refuse both next statements "Particle Own Nature doesn't Change" and "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"….
Lorentz equations for particle length and mass provide the sufficient proof for this fact -
Particle Length And Mass are changing with high velocity motion – which shows clearly that Particle data is created relative to this particle motion.
The previous conclusions are consistent clearly with Lorentz vision based on which Lorentz transformations were created…
The basic difficulty here is found with an old unanswered question let's refer to it:
How the matter is created? How does any Particle define its data?
Conclusion:
Lorentz tells us that, Particle own nature and data must be defined relative to this particle motion
This conclusion we need to discuss in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Contradiction In The Physics Book?
I claim there's a contradiction in the physics book, let's explain it:
Lorentz Transformations Effect
Lorentz Transformations tell us that, Particle data is created relative to its motion, basically because Particle mass and length are changed because of particle high velocity motion…
If Lorentz length contraction is a real effect on particle own nature or just illusion of measurements! This question we have discussed before- and we have found that- Lorentz Length Contraction is a real phenomenon effects on Particle own nature similar to Particle mass increasing as a result of high velocity motion
The previous consideration we have adopted for the next reasons:
(1) The measurements show this contraction and in physics what's measured is what's real
(2) If we consider the length contraction is an illusion of measurements, that tells Particle properties correct definition is found when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle, which supposes that I'm The Universe Reference Point – that's similar to a person looks at mirror – which pushes us to refuse the claim that the contraction is an illusion of measurement
Conclusion
I. Lorentz Length Contraction is a real phenomenon effects on Particle own length
II. Particle Data is created relative to this particle motion
The last conclusion leads us to a contradiction with Newton mechanics
Newton had interpreted Planet motion based on the masses gravity between this planet and the sun – So Planet Mass is the reason of its motion
But Lorentz transformation tell us that – Particle Data (and mass) is created based on this particle Motion…!
i.e.
Planet Motion – according to Lorentz Transformation- must be the reason of Planet Mass – so Planet doesn't move by Masses Gravity – because planet mass is created depending on its motion which tells that Planet motion is found before any other planet data! So how does planet move?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Empirical Data
An Electron Or Subatomic Particle Behaves As A Particle And Not A Wave When It's Observed!
Why?
Because
The Human Mind Realization Process Depends On (And Uses) The Light Velocity (0.3mkm/Sec)
How Does The Observer Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
By Light Beam Produced By The Observer Mind Realization Process.
Paper Idea Summary
This paper tells a clear claim – that –
Because our minds realization process depends on and uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) in the human thinking process that causes the light velocity to be a contributor factor of every thing around us – simply – We See The Universe Through The Light Velocity Effect On Our Vision-
That easily explains the equation E=mc2 – why any Mass Energy is defined relative to the light velocity?! Because the light velocity is found in our minds- that explains Why light velocity is constant in all frames
Now
Because our minds uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec), that enable our minds to produce light beams by the thinking process – this produced light beam can effect on any particle nature as the sun rays effect on all particles –
This is the idea shortly– let's ask……"Is this idea truth?" This paper tries to prove…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
Research Main Conclusion:
The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity
This conclusion is produced by the Following Questions Analysis:
Special Theory Of Relativity Tells Us "If a particle moves by high velocity (Approximately) relative to an observer – the observer will see relativistic effects effected on this particle – (The relativistic effects are Length Contraction - Time Dilation - Mass Increase)
The Questions
1- Are These Relativistic Effects Occurred For The Particle Nature Or For Our Vision Only? (to see something wrong as in the mirage)
2- If these effects are occurred for the Particle Nature – Why the Particle Nature Changes As Result Of The Light Velocity Motion?
3- Is The Particle Nature A Real Nature Or Found Because Of The Observer Effect On This Particle?
This Paper discusses these questions and The Conclusion Proves which are:
1- The Relativistic Effects Analysis
2- A Quantized Experiment
3- The Solar Planet Moves According To A Physical Law (and Not in Chaos)
4- The Moon Angular Diameter
5- The Human Body Contains Electromagnetic Waves
This paper contains 2 points only – Point No.2 (Research Methodology) and Point No. 3 (Research Conclusion Proves)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact (III)
The Paper provides many questions to deepen the theory discussion
Basically
We try here to analyze the main concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?
we have faced a major question which is:
Does The Moon Motion By The Masses Gravity?
Yes
But the masses gravity can't create the moon orbit – let's to answer in following:
-The Light Moves Firstly Because The Light Motion Creates The Distance And Provides The Energy
-The Planet Moves Secondly Because The Planet Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Providing Energy
-The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
i.e.
-There's A Parallel Universe Which We Don't See – Specifically – The Planet Motion hides A Light Motion Accompanying It
-The Created Matter Resists To Save The Motion Based On Which This Matter Is Created – The Matter Resistance we know as the masses gravity forces
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper Contents
2- The Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
3- A Light Motion Is Accompanying With The Planet Motion
4- The Parallel Universe
5- The Masses Gravity Origin
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Basic Arguments (I)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part I)
1st- Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
2nd- Planets Order disproves The Masses Gravity Concept
3rd- There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance
4th- Matter And Space are Created Complementary To Each Other.
5th- Mars Orbital Distance had changed from 84 mkm to be 227.9 mkm
6th- Planets can't be created based on "The Big Bang Theory"
7th- There's One Equation controls All Planets Data
8th- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear Of It
9th- The Observer Effects On The Observation Results
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter Origin and Creation
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet motion depends on light motion
Paper Hypothesis
Planet motion depends on light motion
A Proof
I-Data
(A)
17.4 degrees (inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination)
(B)
23.6 degrees (outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees (Earth Axial Tilt)
(C)
(180 degrees /π) x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt)
(D)
Earth Moon Distance At Perigee 0.363 mkm = 0.99 x0.366 mkm (Outer Planets Diameters Total) (and the moon diameter = 1% of Outer Planets Diameters Total)
II-Discussion
The previous data is an example of many similar where the rate 0.99 is used frequently as a rate between different planets data – and the question is that Why This Rate 0.99 Is Used So Frequently In Different Data (axial tilts – orbital inclinations…etc)? The answer is told by Einstein himself – let's read it:
Book / Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Einstein book)
Section 13 (in Fizu experiment which is repeated frequently by others)
"According to recent and most excellent measurements by Zeeman, the influence of the velocity of flow v on the propagation of light is represented by formula(B)(x'=wt') to within one percent (1%)
I claim the difference 1% is found in the solar planets data by light motion as in Fizu experiment measurements- someone will refuse, claiming that we have no Fizu experiment here – no light beam –no tube and no liquid-
I don't know how that's happened – but it's a property of light motion – and as in Fizu experiment there was a reason to find this percentages 1% and 99%- this same geometrical reason can be found in the solar planets data and motions to use frequently the rates 99% or 1% which we have seen before– simply we need to analyze and discover how the matter is crated and how the distance is formed and based on such analysis we should find that it's the light motion which creates the using of the rates 99% and 1% in the solar planets data.
The observer effects on observation results (SR tells)
Paper Hypothesis (No. 1)
The Observer Effects On The Observational Results
1st Hypothesis Explanation
If a particle (with length L0) moves by speed of light (approximately), this particle may suffer from length contraction effect and be seen with a contracted length (L1)
Then
"What's happened For The Particle Own Nature?"
The theory states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light!
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
So the particle nature is created relative to speed of light! Is it true? NOT
The human mind realization process depends on speed of light – and that explains how the observer effects on observational results…
Paper Hypothesis (No. 2)
Human Mind Realization Process depends On And uses Speed Of Light -
Paper Hypothesis (No. 3)
The Human Mind Realization process (Using Speed Of Light) effects on the universe around.
The Origin of Gravity
The Gravity Origin Theory
The Planets Data Analysis Suggests The Following Theory:
-The Solar System Is Created Originally By A Light Motion
-The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
-The Planet Is A Point Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Available Energy
-The planet matter is created as a function of the planet motion and because of that the planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, orbital inclination, axial tilt …etc….and all the planet data is created to be in harmony and consistency with the planet motion, That because the motion is found before the matter creation and the matter is created to be in harmony with this motion – for that reason the planet (matter) data is in harmony with this planet motion
-The matter is found based on its motion – that means – the motion was found before the matter creation
-The matter is found based on its motion and because of that the matter will be perished if the motion is finished
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (III)
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
My basic work is "Planet Data Analysis" –
Specifically I try to know how planet data is created? – that's why my regular questions are – How the matter is created? Why Earth Circumference =40080 km? Why Saturn diameter =120536 km? or Why Jupiter Mass =1898 x1024 kg?
I search behind the planet data to know how this data is created…
Then I have discovered one important Discovery, let's refer to it in following:
Puzzled Data
(A/B) =1.0725
A & B are different distances in the solar system…
Specially 18 distances of the solar system internal and orbital distances are rated to each other with this same rate 1.0725
i.e.
40% of all the solar system distances are rated to each other with 1.0725 ……why??
(These distances are provided in appendix no. 1 of this paper)
All answers – whatsoever its form – give one meaning – (Pure Coincidences)!
Simply no one knows how the planet orbital distance is defined nor why these distances are rated to each other by this same rate 1.0725!
General Effect
Because the rate 1.0725 is used with 18 distances which = 40% of all distances – I had to conclude that – this rate is not created by any planet effect – it's not related to any specific planet – on the contrary – this rate is a general effect found in the solar system -
That means –
A general force or cause effect on the whole solar system –causes this rate 1.0725.
What's this general effect?
At this junction I had to suppose that – the rate 1.0725 is found as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate –
i.e.
There are relativistic effects in the solar system (generally) and these relativistic effects caused the rate 1.0725 to be created as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate (Hypothesis)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
This paper provides many difficult questions concerning Special Theory of Relativity
To explain that the theory needs extension.
In fact – the theory is so hard to be understood – and I try to prove that this theory is a correct theory but it's just a part of a general one which is NOT GR !
Let's define the discussion content in following
Discussion Content
1- Special Theory of Relativity Hypothesis
2- The Relativistic Effects (Length Contraction As Example)
3- Matter Creation (Preferred Reference of Frame)
4- The Relative Concept
5- A New Relativistic Feature (My Conclusion)
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
1- Solar planet motion real trajectory is a square
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory
3- The 2 forms of trajectories (square and circular) got interaction together and produce the ellipse as the planet motion final trajectory.
4- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done by Uranus and Neptune effects…
5- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
6- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Why the light is the universe highest velocity
Why The Light Velocity Is The Highest In The Universe?
Because our bodies (Matters = Bright Fringes) are created from the Light beams coherence, So our bodies are connected with this specific light beams from which were created, so any other light beams (for example the original light beam) we can't discover it by our 5 senses because we connected to the bright fringes only
So,
Even if there's light higher velocity, we can't discover it
Is There A Contradiction Between SR And GR?
Let's summarize the contradiction point in following:
(1)
Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle 4 values are changing with high- velocity motion – these values are: Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time
In our previous discussion- we have concluded that – we have to accept the particle length contraction and mass increasing as real phenomena which can't be illusion of measurements – we have reach to this conclusion based on 2 reasons – (1st) because of the empirical proves for these features (length contraction- mass increasing)- where we need to protect the physical experimental measurements credibility and (2nd) Because we don't want to make ourselves as The Universe Reference Point.
Shortly
Lorentz Transformations tell that Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time are changed by the same reason – i.e. they are dealt as similar to each other
(2)
The special theory of relativity is built on Lorentz Transformations
But
In The General Theory of relativity Einstein tells us
"The existence of gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of Space. On the other hand a part of Space may very well be imagined without electromagnetic field," …
……..Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field….
Namely gravitational ether and electromagnetic field or – as they might also be called – Space And Matter
The Contradiction Point
Lorentz Transformations deal with Space and Matter as equal ….But
The General theory of relativity distinguishes between the space and matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (part no.3)
This Paper discusses and proves the following hypothesis:
Light Is An Essential Player In The Matter Creation Process
Lorentz Length Contraction (More Discussion)
The Special Theory of Relativity tells us that
The matter is created of electromagnetic wave or at least depend on it
i.e.
The Universe Matter Is Related To Electromagnetic Waves
The research presentation
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
More Related Content
What's hot
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon & Not Illusion Of Measurements
Paper Question:
"Is Lorentz Length Contraction a real phenomenon or illusion of Measurements?"
Or …
"What's happened For Particle Own Nature, if this particle travels by high velocity?"
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that –Particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is found as illusion of measurements
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that –Particle own nature changes with high velocity motion.
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined correctly when no difference in motions velocities found between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
Specifically for the previous reason we should refuse both next statements "Particle Own Nature doesn't Change" and "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"….
Lorentz equations for particle length and mass provide the sufficient proof for this fact -
Particle Length And Mass are changing with high velocity motion – which shows clearly that Particle data is created relative to this particle motion.
The previous conclusions are consistent clearly with Lorentz vision based on which Lorentz transformations were created…
The basic difficulty here is found with an old unanswered question let's refer to it:
How the matter is created? How does any Particle define its data?
Conclusion:
Lorentz tells us that, Particle own nature and data must be defined relative to this particle motion
This conclusion we need to discuss in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Contradiction In The Physics Book?
I claim there's a contradiction in the physics book, let's explain it:
Lorentz Transformations Effect
Lorentz Transformations tell us that, Particle data is created relative to its motion, basically because Particle mass and length are changed because of particle high velocity motion…
If Lorentz length contraction is a real effect on particle own nature or just illusion of measurements! This question we have discussed before- and we have found that- Lorentz Length Contraction is a real phenomenon effects on Particle own nature similar to Particle mass increasing as a result of high velocity motion
The previous consideration we have adopted for the next reasons:
(1) The measurements show this contraction and in physics what's measured is what's real
(2) If we consider the length contraction is an illusion of measurements, that tells Particle properties correct definition is found when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle, which supposes that I'm The Universe Reference Point – that's similar to a person looks at mirror – which pushes us to refuse the claim that the contraction is an illusion of measurement
Conclusion
I. Lorentz Length Contraction is a real phenomenon effects on Particle own length
II. Particle Data is created relative to this particle motion
The last conclusion leads us to a contradiction with Newton mechanics
Newton had interpreted Planet motion based on the masses gravity between this planet and the sun – So Planet Mass is the reason of its motion
But Lorentz transformation tell us that – Particle Data (and mass) is created based on this particle Motion…!
i.e.
Planet Motion – according to Lorentz Transformation- must be the reason of Planet Mass – so Planet doesn't move by Masses Gravity – because planet mass is created depending on its motion which tells that Planet motion is found before any other planet data! So how does planet move?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Empirical Data
An Electron Or Subatomic Particle Behaves As A Particle And Not A Wave When It's Observed!
Why?
Because
The Human Mind Realization Process Depends On (And Uses) The Light Velocity (0.3mkm/Sec)
How Does The Observer Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
By Light Beam Produced By The Observer Mind Realization Process.
Paper Idea Summary
This paper tells a clear claim – that –
Because our minds realization process depends on and uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) in the human thinking process that causes the light velocity to be a contributor factor of every thing around us – simply – We See The Universe Through The Light Velocity Effect On Our Vision-
That easily explains the equation E=mc2 – why any Mass Energy is defined relative to the light velocity?! Because the light velocity is found in our minds- that explains Why light velocity is constant in all frames
Now
Because our minds uses the light velocity (0.3mkm/sec), that enable our minds to produce light beams by the thinking process – this produced light beam can effect on any particle nature as the sun rays effect on all particles –
This is the idea shortly– let's ask……"Is this idea truth?" This paper tries to prove…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
Research Main Conclusion:
The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity
This conclusion is produced by the Following Questions Analysis:
Special Theory Of Relativity Tells Us "If a particle moves by high velocity (Approximately) relative to an observer – the observer will see relativistic effects effected on this particle – (The relativistic effects are Length Contraction - Time Dilation - Mass Increase)
The Questions
1- Are These Relativistic Effects Occurred For The Particle Nature Or For Our Vision Only? (to see something wrong as in the mirage)
2- If these effects are occurred for the Particle Nature – Why the Particle Nature Changes As Result Of The Light Velocity Motion?
3- Is The Particle Nature A Real Nature Or Found Because Of The Observer Effect On This Particle?
This Paper discusses these questions and The Conclusion Proves which are:
1- The Relativistic Effects Analysis
2- A Quantized Experiment
3- The Solar Planet Moves According To A Physical Law (and Not in Chaos)
4- The Moon Angular Diameter
5- The Human Body Contains Electromagnetic Waves
This paper contains 2 points only – Point No.2 (Research Methodology) and Point No. 3 (Research Conclusion Proves)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact (III)
The Paper provides many questions to deepen the theory discussion
Basically
We try here to analyze the main concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?
we have faced a major question which is:
Does The Moon Motion By The Masses Gravity?
Yes
But the masses gravity can't create the moon orbit – let's to answer in following:
-The Light Moves Firstly Because The Light Motion Creates The Distance And Provides The Energy
-The Planet Moves Secondly Because The Planet Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Providing Energy
-The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
i.e.
-There's A Parallel Universe Which We Don't See – Specifically – The Planet Motion hides A Light Motion Accompanying It
-The Created Matter Resists To Save The Motion Based On Which This Matter Is Created – The Matter Resistance we know as the masses gravity forces
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper Contents
2- The Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
3- A Light Motion Is Accompanying With The Planet Motion
4- The Parallel Universe
5- The Masses Gravity Origin
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Basic Arguments (I)
My Research Basic Arguments (Part I)
1st- Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
2nd- Planets Order disproves The Masses Gravity Concept
3rd- There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance
4th- Matter And Space are Created Complementary To Each Other.
5th- Mars Orbital Distance had changed from 84 mkm to be 227.9 mkm
6th- Planets can't be created based on "The Big Bang Theory"
7th- There's One Equation controls All Planets Data
8th- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear Of It
9th- The Observer Effects On The Observation Results
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Matter Origin and Creation
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet motion depends on light motion
Paper Hypothesis
Planet motion depends on light motion
A Proof
I-Data
(A)
17.4 degrees (inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination)
(B)
23.6 degrees (outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees (Earth Axial Tilt)
(C)
(180 degrees /π) x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt)
(D)
Earth Moon Distance At Perigee 0.363 mkm = 0.99 x0.366 mkm (Outer Planets Diameters Total) (and the moon diameter = 1% of Outer Planets Diameters Total)
II-Discussion
The previous data is an example of many similar where the rate 0.99 is used frequently as a rate between different planets data – and the question is that Why This Rate 0.99 Is Used So Frequently In Different Data (axial tilts – orbital inclinations…etc)? The answer is told by Einstein himself – let's read it:
Book / Relativity: The Special and General Theory (Einstein book)
Section 13 (in Fizu experiment which is repeated frequently by others)
"According to recent and most excellent measurements by Zeeman, the influence of the velocity of flow v on the propagation of light is represented by formula(B)(x'=wt') to within one percent (1%)
I claim the difference 1% is found in the solar planets data by light motion as in Fizu experiment measurements- someone will refuse, claiming that we have no Fizu experiment here – no light beam –no tube and no liquid-
I don't know how that's happened – but it's a property of light motion – and as in Fizu experiment there was a reason to find this percentages 1% and 99%- this same geometrical reason can be found in the solar planets data and motions to use frequently the rates 99% or 1% which we have seen before– simply we need to analyze and discover how the matter is crated and how the distance is formed and based on such analysis we should find that it's the light motion which creates the using of the rates 99% and 1% in the solar planets data.
The observer effects on observation results (SR tells)
Paper Hypothesis (No. 1)
The Observer Effects On The Observational Results
1st Hypothesis Explanation
If a particle (with length L0) moves by speed of light (approximately), this particle may suffer from length contraction effect and be seen with a contracted length (L1)
Then
"What's happened For The Particle Own Nature?"
The theory states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"!
We have 2 directions to choose from:
(1st) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change
Or
(2nd) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light!
I choose the 2nd choice- Why?
Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror
So the particle nature is created relative to speed of light! Is it true? NOT
The human mind realization process depends on speed of light – and that explains how the observer effects on observational results…
Paper Hypothesis (No. 2)
Human Mind Realization Process depends On And uses Speed Of Light -
Paper Hypothesis (No. 3)
The Human Mind Realization process (Using Speed Of Light) effects on the universe around.
The Origin of Gravity
The Gravity Origin Theory
The Planets Data Analysis Suggests The Following Theory:
-The Solar System Is Created Originally By A Light Motion
-The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
-The Planet Is A Point Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Available Energy
-The planet matter is created as a function of the planet motion and because of that the planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, orbital inclination, axial tilt …etc….and all the planet data is created to be in harmony and consistency with the planet motion, That because the motion is found before the matter creation and the matter is created to be in harmony with this motion – for that reason the planet (matter) data is in harmony with this planet motion
-The matter is found based on its motion – that means – the motion was found before the matter creation
-The matter is found based on its motion and because of that the matter will be perished if the motion is finished
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (III)
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
My basic work is "Planet Data Analysis" –
Specifically I try to know how planet data is created? – that's why my regular questions are – How the matter is created? Why Earth Circumference =40080 km? Why Saturn diameter =120536 km? or Why Jupiter Mass =1898 x1024 kg?
I search behind the planet data to know how this data is created…
Then I have discovered one important Discovery, let's refer to it in following:
Puzzled Data
(A/B) =1.0725
A & B are different distances in the solar system…
Specially 18 distances of the solar system internal and orbital distances are rated to each other with this same rate 1.0725
i.e.
40% of all the solar system distances are rated to each other with 1.0725 ……why??
(These distances are provided in appendix no. 1 of this paper)
All answers – whatsoever its form – give one meaning – (Pure Coincidences)!
Simply no one knows how the planet orbital distance is defined nor why these distances are rated to each other by this same rate 1.0725!
General Effect
Because the rate 1.0725 is used with 18 distances which = 40% of all distances – I had to conclude that – this rate is not created by any planet effect – it's not related to any specific planet – on the contrary – this rate is a general effect found in the solar system -
That means –
A general force or cause effect on the whole solar system –causes this rate 1.0725.
What's this general effect?
At this junction I had to suppose that – the rate 1.0725 is found as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate –
i.e.
There are relativistic effects in the solar system (generally) and these relativistic effects caused the rate 1.0725 to be created as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate (Hypothesis)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
This paper provides many difficult questions concerning Special Theory of Relativity
To explain that the theory needs extension.
In fact – the theory is so hard to be understood – and I try to prove that this theory is a correct theory but it's just a part of a general one which is NOT GR !
Let's define the discussion content in following
Discussion Content
1- Special Theory of Relativity Hypothesis
2- The Relativistic Effects (Length Contraction As Example)
3- Matter Creation (Preferred Reference of Frame)
4- The Relative Concept
5- A New Relativistic Feature (My Conclusion)
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
1- Solar planet motion real trajectory is a square
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory
3- The 2 forms of trajectories (square and circular) got interaction together and produce the ellipse as the planet motion final trajectory.
4- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done by Uranus and Neptune effects…
5- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
6- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Why the light is the universe highest velocity
Why The Light Velocity Is The Highest In The Universe?
Because our bodies (Matters = Bright Fringes) are created from the Light beams coherence, So our bodies are connected with this specific light beams from which were created, so any other light beams (for example the original light beam) we can't discover it by our 5 senses because we connected to the bright fringes only
So,
Even if there's light higher velocity, we can't discover it
Is There A Contradiction Between SR And GR?
Let's summarize the contradiction point in following:
(1)
Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle 4 values are changing with high- velocity motion – these values are: Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time
In our previous discussion- we have concluded that – we have to accept the particle length contraction and mass increasing as real phenomena which can't be illusion of measurements – we have reach to this conclusion based on 2 reasons – (1st) because of the empirical proves for these features (length contraction- mass increasing)- where we need to protect the physical experimental measurements credibility and (2nd) Because we don't want to make ourselves as The Universe Reference Point.
Shortly
Lorentz Transformations tell that Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time are changed by the same reason – i.e. they are dealt as similar to each other
(2)
The special theory of relativity is built on Lorentz Transformations
But
In The General Theory of relativity Einstein tells us
"The existence of gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of Space. On the other hand a part of Space may very well be imagined without electromagnetic field," …
……..Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field….
Namely gravitational ether and electromagnetic field or – as they might also be called – Space And Matter
The Contradiction Point
Lorentz Transformations deal with Space and Matter as equal ….But
The General theory of relativity distinguishes between the space and matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (part no.3)
This Paper discusses and proves the following hypothesis:
Light Is An Essential Player In The Matter Creation Process
What's hot (20)
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon & Not Illusion Of Measurements
Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon & Not Illusion Of Measurements
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
Human mind realization process uses the light velocity
The observer effects on observation results (SR tells)
The observer effects on observation results (SR tells)
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
Special theory of relativity (questions for discussion)
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse?
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Similar to Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part II)
Lorentz Length Contraction (More Discussion)
The Special Theory of Relativity tells us that
The matter is created of electromagnetic wave or at least depend on it
i.e.
The Universe Matter Is Related To Electromagnetic Waves
The research presentation
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (more discussion)
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The research presentation (revised) (ii)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Research Presentation (Revised) (III)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Presentation (Revised) (IV)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The relativistic effects reason
This paper discusses one conclusion only which is:
All Matters and Materials around us are light beams we see as matters and materials because of the human mind realization process.
Simultaneity Role in The Solar System (SR Discussions)
One of the basic difficulties I have faced with the Special Theory of Relativity….is
What's happened on the next day after the relativistic effects?!
We know L0 will be contracted and be L1 - and t0 will be longer t1 – also m0 will be greater m1 But how these values will live their rest of lives?!
Imagine we have a rectangle its length L0 now if this length be contracted by lorentz length contraction phenomenon to become L1 – is this new length will work as the rectangle length or this position will change….?
Shortly
How the relativistic system will cooperate with the non-relativistic one?
Special Theory of relativity gives us a short information – it's a story for what's happening in accident – but what will happen after?…. we don't know!
Now I wish to write my conclusion how Einstein created this theory….
While Einstein depends on hundreds of electrodynamics experimental results and many of new discoveries in particle motion analysis – he had a very hard job to find the cooperation point between all this material –
In addition to his incredible brilliant intelligence – he was so brave warrior to accept such heavy job to do
The theory gives us incomplete picture –because – he didn't allow himself to provide imagination has no proves – so he provided the facts which are proved by experiments and their direct conclusions with so deep insights
Now this is almost the electrodynamics apex capacity – means – this is the highest result can reach by the 5 senses experiments – instead we have to use Data Analysis to see much deeper
We simply ask why they didn't use the data analysis? The difficulty here is in the experiment meaning in itself…
Because we don't know how the matter is created?, we don't really know the experiment tools which we use – Einstein told us that – we even didn't know how to use the time and distance values which we measure in labs that because we have wrong definitions about them
Shortly
If we search for a system in which a relativistic dimension has cooperation with non-relativistic one- so this system we can't be created in experiments – we have to find it in the nature itself –
Clearly we can't create such system – basically because we have no the required sufficient knowledge to do
I provide a clear claim here– I claim that the solar system has relativistic effects – and because the system works sufficiently – we conclude that the relativistic dimension cooperates with the non-relativistic one perfectly- and they consist together the solar system –
This idea gives us a chance to a new-approach analysis for the theory– let's start in following
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry (Part II)
Paper Hypothesis
- Space = Energy
- Space is created by light motion
i.e.
- Light motion can create a distance
If
- Light creates a new distance by its motion – we may see this distance as a period of time
But
- If the light pass through a distance found already and not new one – we may see this distance as a distance and not period of time
- This idea supports 2 basic claim which are
- 1st / Time and Distance Values can be equivalent in higher velocity
- 2nd/ Space is Energy and be created by light motion
The Big Bang Is A Mystery (SR proves)
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact (V)
The paper discusses more deep the results of the basic Concept which is:
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Why we have to suggest this concept?
Because
The Planet Motion shows Geometrical Effects And Rules Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Based on that– we have to find the player which creates these geometrical effects and rules if the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics can't create them
To solve this dilemma I have to suggest that there's a light beam motion hidden the planet motion
I have provided 9 proves (in Part II) and 4 other proves (in part VI) to show that the planets motions geometrical structures can't be explained by the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the 4 proves of (Part VI) I have tried to prove that the distances are created because of the light motions - the data provides Strong & Clear Direction to support this claim.
So
The very near conclusion is that "Planet Moves Following For Light Motion"
Or
"The Planet & Light motions pass the same distance but with different rates of time"
The different rates of time are created as relativistic effects because we deal with light motions –
But
The next question will cause the serious discussion
"Now If The Light And Planet Pass The Same Distance by different rates of time- if it's fact- the question should be – "Are the events will be seen in double?" because – the same event is passed by light motion (at first) and then by the planet motion (at second) Where there's a difference in time between both motions because of the different rate of time between Planet and Light Motions?!"
Simply – Do We Live In A Universe Has Double Vision?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part II) (13)
Simultaneity Role in The Solar System (SR Discussions)
Simultaneity Role in The Solar System (SR Discussions)
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry (Part II)
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry (Part II)
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
RNA INTERFERENCE: UNRAVELING GENETIC SILENCING
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderland
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
SCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdf
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
It is useful for the Under Graduating students for easy understanding and it's useful for the exam preparations.
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening was one of the major causes of decline in the citrus production. So, effective management cultural practices should be incorporated
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
An overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Adrenal gland comparative structures in vertebrates
Recently uploaded (20)
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
erythropoiesis-I_mechanism& clinical significance.pptx
erythropoiesis-I_mechanism& clinical significance.pptx
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
platelets- lifespan -Clot retraction-disorders.pptx
platelets- lifespan -Clot retraction-disorders.pptx
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part II)
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) (Part II) 2nd Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013 TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / gergesgerges@yandex.ru The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 12th November 2019 Abstract Paper Hypothesis Human Realization process Is The Universe Reference Point 1- A Basic Argument Let's remember our question in the previous paper Lorentz Length Contraction Analysis (SR Discussions) http://vixra.org/abs/1911.0181 The question was: The relativistic features are: I. Length Contraction II. Time Dilation III. Mass Increasing Why these 3 features only are effected by travel by light velocity (approximately)? Let's try to analyze this question as possible Einstein told us that – our false concepts are – (1) The time - interval between 2 events is independent of the condition of motion of the body of reference (2) The distance - interval between 2 events of rigid body is independent of the condition of motion of the body of reference (Albert Einstein Book – Relativity: The Special and General Theory- Section 11) Simply he tells that – Point motion effects one its time and distance definitions Based on that – Spacetime Concept is created- Based on what Einstein had supposed this idea? Based on Lorentz Equations (1st Equation) (2nd Equation) 3rd Equation)
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 Equations 2 & 3 supports Einstein explanation – that time & distance depends on motion – based on which Spacetime concept is created But What about the first equation? Mass Also Is Changing As Relativistic Effect – as similar to time and distance – now Spacetime concept doesn't include the mass! Why? Let's try to analyze this point with some deep in following Particle Length Contraction (Distance Contraction): In Einstein definition for length contraction – he used the distance and particle length as equivalent to each other…! How to understand that? In lorentz experiments particle length contraction is discovered, and in Feazu experiment the distance is contracted..! Both experiments deal equally with particle length and distance contractions – how the distance can be considered equivalent to particle length?! Now We Have 1- The mass which changes as similar as the time and distance but spacetime concept ignored it 2- Particle length is contracted as similar to the distance Shortly We have 4 players here: Time, distance, mass and particle length 2 of them (Time And Distance) are used to create The Spacetime Concept – and 2 of them (Particle Mass and Length) were left as data without explanation I want to say that – these 4 features must be changed based on the same reason – which we know– "Light Velocity" Light velocity –which is a main player in the universe geometry – basically because of the equation E=mc2 which makes all matters are relative to light velocity So the light velocity causes these 4 relativities effects (features) Conclusion Particle Data must be created based on Particle Motion (and relative to light velocity)! Now We have no Particle Length Rest Concept, but we have A Rest Mass Concept – Why we believe in rest mass concept –where particle length is changed as relativistic effect and no guarantee that length (rest) should be reserved – based on what Rest Mass concept is created and be acceptable?
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 2- Light Velocity As An Effective Player On The Universe Geometry What do we know about light velocity? 1- It's A Basic Factor In Matter Energy (E=mc2 ) 2- Relative to light velocity, particle properties (length, mass, time and distance) are changing 3- The human mind uses electric pulses (and may produce electromagnetic waves) 4- Solar Planets motions are light beams motions – but we see as matters motion because we are restricted and controlled by Earth motion and our bodies effect (Planet Motion Depends on Light Motion http://vixra.org/abs/1911.0091) Again let's review our question If a particle (with length L0) travels by speed of light (approximately), it will suffer from Lorentz length contraction and be seen with a contracted length (L1) So – the question is - "What's happened For The Particle Own Nature?" The theory states "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"! We have 2 directions to choose from: (1st ) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature doesn't change and the contracted length is seen by us as a wrong vision (as mirage) but the particle length itself has no real change Or (2nd ) to accept the idea that – the particle own nature changes with this motion – and by such way – the particle nature should be created relative to speed of light! I choose the 2nd choice- Why? Because – the 1st choice tells us that – The particle own nature is defined clearly when no difference in motions velocities between me and this particle – that means – I'm The Universe Reference Point – and this is similar to a person looks at a mirror Specifically for the previous reason we should refuse the assumption that "Particle Own Nature doesn't Change" or the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change"…. In fact ….Particle length is changed already Let's consider this point with some deep analysis in following: We deal here with the assumption "Particle length doesn’t change and the contracted length is only an imaginary vision"
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 How do we measure the particle length in static case (before any motion)? and how do we measure the moving particle length? Where we use The Same Methods in both cases – practically and logically – we have to consider both results are equal in power – no result is better than the other because both are produced by the same methods of measurements.. Moreover that I consider that –Particle in static should be considered as a special case because it moves by my velocity Conclusions (1) Particle own length is contracted by high velocity (light velocity approximately) Because I'm not "The Universe Reference Point" I refuse the statement "The Proper Length L0 Never Change" (2) Particle Data is created relative to light velocity (3) Light Velocity should be a player in Human Realization Process i.e. human mind realization process, light velocity and particle data are created relative to each other That Force Us To Provide The Following conclusion A Conclusion: Human Realization process Is The Universe Reference Point Research Paper "The observer effects on observation results (SR tells)" http://vixra.org/abs/1911.0040 or https://www.academia.edu/40829783/The_observer_effects_on_observation_results_SR_tells_ Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044 E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous