Distributed Objectives of Imagining Generative Scholarship
1. DISTRIBUTED OBJECTIVITES OF IMAGINING: The generative scholarship driving Networked TARA ZEPEL University of California, San Diego Networked Humanities: Art History in the Web ESF Research Conference 9-14 October 2010
8. Are we entering an age in which data can write scholarship? WEB 2.0 SCHOLARSHIP is GENERATIVE SCHOLARSHIP How do answers reshape cultures of scholarship and creation? What does this mean for the role of the researcher? The scholar?
9. “ A networked book is an open book designed to be written, edited, and read in a networked environment. It is also a platform for social exchange, and is potentially linked to other books and other discussions.” - Wikipedia, “Networked Book” (as of Oct 2010) NETWORKED : a (networked_book) about (networked_art)
10.
11. Remix and the Rouelles of Media Production Deseriis › No End In Sight Ulmer › The Learning Screen Varnelis › The Immediated Now Helmond › Lifetracing Freeman › Storage in Collaborative Networked Art Munster › Data Undermining Lichty › Art in the Age of DataFlow
12. Remix and the Rouelles of Media Production Deseriis › No End In Sight Ulmer › The Learning Screen Varnelis › The Immediated Now Helmond › Lifetracing Freeman › Storage in Collaborative Networked Art Munster › Data Undermining Lichty › Art in the Age of DataFlow
13. Remix and the Rouelles of Media Production Deseriis › No End In Sight Ulmer › The Learning Screen Varnelis › The Immediated Now Helmond › Lifetracing Freeman › Storage in Collaborative Networked Art Munster › Data Undermining Lichty › Art in the Age of DataFlow
14. Remix and the Rouelles of Media Production Deseriis › No End In Sight Ulmer › The Learning Screen Varnelis › The Immediated Now Helmond › Lifetracing Freeman › Storage in Collaborative Networked Art Munster › Data Undermining Lichty › Art in the Age of DataFlow
15.
16.
17. NETWORKED: a unique advantage “ Ne tworked proposes that a history or critique of interactive and/or participatory art must itself be interactive and/or participatory; that the technologies used to create a work suggest new forms a ‘te xt’ might take.”
20. users add value (in data) THESIS 1: Aesthetic Expression
21.
22. COMMENTS TEXT EDITS SOCIAL NETWORK FACEBOOK GROUP CLOUD SERVER WIKI RSS/ WEBSITES COMMENT PRESS SOFTWARE GROUPS USERS ADD VALUE (IN DATA)
23. COMMENTS TEXT EDITS SOCIAL NETWORK FACEBOOK GROUP CLOUD SERVER WIKI RSS/ WEBSITES COMMENT PRESS SOFTWARE GROUPS USERS ADD VALUE (IN DATA)
24. meaning in (or in-between) the data THESIS 2: Aesthetic | Cognitive Extension
25.
26.
27.
28. Contact Information: TARA ZEPEL University of California, San Diego PhD Student, Art History, Theory & Criticism [email_address] http://artfuturenow.com THANK YOU
Editor's Notes
[SLIDE 2] ART HISTORY IN THE WEB What does it actually mean to position art history in the web? In . A short two letter word. Yet, the pivot point that brings us all here. So, what is it that’s so intriguing about 妬 n � ? To say that art history is (or can be) in the web indicates something much more profound than a line drawn between the study of culture (in this case the study of art) and the environment we have come to call the Web.