This document outlines testing procedures and security protocols for administering state standardized tests. It instructs test administrators to properly account for all testing materials, maintain confidentiality of test content, actively monitor students, and ensure tests are administered according to guidelines. It describes security violations and consequences, as well as prohibited activities like helping students, copying content, or discussing the test outside of administration. Test administrators must receive training, sign a security oath, and follow all procedures to uphold test integrity.
Topic: Factors in Test Administeration
Student Name: Afsheen
Class: M.Ed.
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Factors in Test Administration
Student Name: Afsheen Memon
Class: M.Ed
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Administration/Conducting the Test
Student Name: Waqar Hassan
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Factors in Test Administeration
Student Name: Afsheen
Class: M.Ed.
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Factors in Test Administration
Student Name: Afsheen Memon
Class: M.Ed
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Administration/Conducting the Test
Student Name: Waqar Hassan
Class: B.Ed. (Hons) Elementary
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Teacher Made Test vs Standardized Test
Student Name: Kanwal Naz
Class: B.Ed 1.5
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Topic: Teacher Made Test vs Standardized Test
Student Name: Kanwal Naz
Class: B.Ed 1.5
Project Name: “Young Teachers' Professional Development (TPD)"
"Project Founder: Prof. Dr. Amjad Ali Arain
Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Pakistan
Classroom Assessment is a systematic approach to formative evaluation, used by instructors to determine how much and how well students are learning. CATs and other informal assessment tools provide key information during the semester regarding teaching and learning so that changes can be made as necessary. "The central purpose of Classroom Assessment is to empower both teachers and their students to improve the quality of learning in the classroom" through an approach that is "learner-centered, teacher-directed, mutually beneficial, formative, context-specific, and firmly rooted in good practice" (Angelo & Cross, 1993, p. 4).
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
4.
Accounting for all secure materials and confidential
student information before, during and after each
test administration.
As an administrator, you must
Accurately complete any documents used for
accounting (Material Control Form);
Complete the seating chart;
Place test booklets and answer documents in
limited-access locked storage when not in use;
Ensure when testing has concluded that all secure
materials have been accounted for and returned to
the campus coordinator.
5.
Maintaining the confidentiality of the state testing
program by protecting the contents of the test
booklets and completed answer documents.
Before handing test materials, test administrators
must attend training and sign the security oath.
All test must be administered in accordance with
the instructions in the test administration materials.
No person may view, reveal, or discuss the
contents of a test booklet before, during or after a
test administration.
6. No
person may duplicate, print, record, writes
notes about, or capture by any electronic means
any portion of a secure assessment.
No
individuals other that students during an
assessment may perform calculations, solve, or
respond to test items.
If
giving an oral administration, a test
administrator may
not discuss the content of the test with anyone.
7. Individuals
who are authorized to conduct test
administration procedures that require viewing
secure assessments have the added
responsibility of maintaining confidentiality.
These include oral administration and
transcribing.
No
person may review or discuss student
responses during or after the test administration
unless specifically authorized to do so by the
procedures outlined in the test administration
materials.
8.
Any person who violates, assists in the violation
of, or solicits another to violate or assist in the
violation of test security or confidentiality, and any
person who fails to report such a violation, may be
subject to the following:
•
•
•
•
Placement of restrictions
Issuance of a reprimand
Suspension of a Texas educator certificate
Cancellation of a Texas educator certificate
Release or disclosure of confidential test content could result
in criminal prosecution
9. All
district personnel who participate in statemandated testing or handle secure test materials
must meet the eligibility requirements detailed in
the test administrator manuals, be trained, and
sign a security oath.
All
oaths are valid for the 2014
spring, summer, and fall testing.
11. Incidents
resulting in a deviation from
documented testing procedures
2
categories
• Serious
• Procedural
12.
Constitute severe violations of test security and/or
confidentiality
Examples of serious violations involve, but are not limited
to the following:
• Directly or indirectly assisting students with responses to test
questions or writing samples
• Tampering with student responses or writing samples
• Viewing secure test content during or after an assessment
• Discussing secure test content, student responses, or student
performance
• Score student reading tests, either formally or informally
• Duplicating, recording, or capturing electronically secure test
content
13. Are less severe, more common, and are typically the result of minor
deviations
The following are some examples:
Eligibility Error
• Eligible students were not tested
IEP Implementation Issue
• A prescribed accommodation was not provided
Improper Accounting for Materials
• An answer document is lost.
Monitoring Error
• Students were left unattended.
Procedural Error
• A TA failed to issue the correct materials, or students were provided non-
allowable materials
14. Each
person participating in the state
assessment program is directly
responsible for reporting immediately any
violation or suspected violation of test
security or confidentiality
Dawson
Mrs.
staff should notify Mrs. Holt
Holt will notify the District Testing
Coordinator.
17. Cell phones are NOT permitted.
This means for students and test
administrators.
Have students turn off their phone, place it in
a bag, and label with their name. Place cell
phones in a secure place.
18. Ensure proper testing procedures.
BACKPACKS MUST GO
ALONG THE WALL
STUDENTS MUST
HAVE AN ID
PUT PURSES IN THE FRONT OF THE
ROOM AND DON’T ALLOW THEM
TO THE RESTROOM
19.
Ensure proper testing procedures (p. 29)
• Please turn to page 29 in the Test Administrator Manual
• Students must record their responses on the answer document within the
four hours time period. Test administrators may say,
“Remember that you must record your responses on the answer document.”
• It is permissible to encourage students to stay on task.
• Only students are allowed to erase their stray marks or darken answer
choice circles, and only during the scheduled test session Test
administrators may say,
“ Be sure to erase any stray marks that you might have accidentally made on
your answer document.:
20.
Answering students’ questions (p. 36)
“I can’t answer that for you; just do the best you can.”
Collect test materials (p. 36)
“You have not recorded all of your responses on the answer document.
Please go back and mark your answers on it now.”
21. Monitoring
during test administrations is the
responsibility of the test administrator, the
campus test coordinator, the campus
principal, campus monitors, and the district
test coordinator
22.
Test Administrators are required to actively monitor
students during testing.
Principals and Campus Test Coordinators are required to
actively monitor testing sessions at their campus.
The district testing coordinator is required to actively monitor
testing sessions at all campuses within the district.
• A team of central office personnel trained to monitor testing
sessions will be used to assist the district testing coordinator in
monitoring campus testing sessions.
• Every testing session will be actively monitored.
23. Watching students during testing. The
focus of the teacher’s attention is on the
students and not elsewhere.
• Walking around to better observe what students are doing.
(Are students: Working on correct section of test?, Marking
answers on the answer document?, Cheating?, Using cell
phones?, Talking with other students?)
24.
Working on the computer or doing email.
Reading a book, magazine, or newspaper.
Grading papers or lesson planning.
Leaving the room without a trained substitute test
administrator in the room.
Leaving students unattended during lunch or breaks.
Reading the test over a student’s shoulder.
Checking student responses during testing.
25. TAs
must actively monitor the testing room while
students are working.
• TAs should confirm that students are working only on
the subject-area assessment being administered that
day and that they do not have access to non-allowed
materials.
• TAs may not view or discuss individual test items or
responses.
26. Reinforcing,
reviewing for, and/or distributing
testing strategies during an assessment is strictly
prohibited.
• Providing this type of assistance to students can result
in the invalidation of their tests and can compromise
the assurance that all individuals are equitably
assessed in accordance with the guidelines for
standardized assessments.
28.
Students must mark their answers on an answer document
with a No. 2 pencil
TAs are not allowed to require students to first mark their
answers in the test booklet & then transfer them to the
answer document
Students may be allowed to quietly read books after
materials are collected
29.
No environmental hindrances
A “Testing – Do Not Disturb” sign posted outside each
testing room
Bulletin boards & instructional displays must be covered
or removed
All desks must be cleared of books & other materials
not required for the test
30.
Account for ALL test booklets
Ensure that answer document fields have been
completed
Return test materials