2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
Key Findings and trends
Andrew Blazey and Anne Keller
14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Asian SBO
Bangkok, Thailand
13 – 14 December 2018
“A single flagship
publication for SBO”
What is the “state of
the art” in modern
budgeting?
What are the key
challenges that
countries face?
Context I: OECD Budgeting Flagship Publication
2
Budgeting
within
fiscal
objectives
Context II: OECD Framework of Modern Budgeting
Quality,
integrity &
independent
audit
Performance,
Evaluation &
VFM
Comprehensi
ve budget
accounting
Effective
budget
execution
Alignment
with medium-
term strategic
plans and
priorities
Performance,
evaluation &
VFM
Transparency,
openness &
accessibility
Participative,
Inclusive
& Realistic
Debate
Fiscal Risks &
Sustainability
Capital
budgeting
framework
3
• Fifth OECD PB Survey
• Coverage:
45 questions on
Performance Budgeting
Spending Review
Evaluation
• Respondents mainly from CBAs
• Response rate: 33 countries (out of 35)
• Some data cleaning is ongoing
 all 2018 data in this presentation is coming from the
2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
4
2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
Part I – Performance Budgeting
5
2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
6
Performance Budgeting
Use of performance frameworks continues to increase
over time and are the norm across the OECD
7
Performance Budgeting
Target setting tends to be done by line ministries,
and its coverage varies
Coverage of performance
targets (2018)
Responsibility for
target setting (2018)
8
Performance Budgeting
Increased use of performance information - across a broad
range of stakeholders – is observed over the last 5 years
Number of countries
9
Performance Budgeting
Spending Review information is becoming more important and
is more likely to be used during budget negotiations
10
Performance Budgeting
The greatest benefits are increased transparency about objectives,
and the quality and usefulness of performance information
11
Performance Budgeting
Coordination problems are the biggest challenge
Main challenges for the implementation of performance budgeting (2018)
12
Performance Budgeting
Gender is one of the thematic objectives most likely to be
systematically integrated into performance frameworks
Indicators of cross cutting or thematic objectives in the budget (2018)
13
Performance Budgeting
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are not yet systematically
reflected in performance frameworks
Reflection of SDG targets and indicators in national frameworks (2018)
1. Use of performance frameworks continues to increase over
time and are the norm across the OECD
2. Target setting tends to be the responsibility of line ministries
and coverage across programmes varies
3. Over recent years, increased use of performance information
- by a broad range of stakeholders - has been observed
4. Spending Review information is becoming more important
and is increasingly likely to be used during budget
negotiations
5. Performance Budgeting has increased the transparency of
programme objectives and the quality and usefulness of
performance information
6. Coordination problems are the biggest challenge for
Performance Budgeting
14
Performance Budgeting (PB) – Key Observations
Part II – Spending Review
15
2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
16
Spending Reviews
Continued increase in number of countries conducting
spending reviews
Adoption of spending reviews (2011-2018)
17
Spending Reviews
Focus is moving away from short-term budget cuts to a more medium-
term view on efficiency and an improved programme impact
Main objectives of Spending Reviews over the past 10 years (2018)
18
Spending Reviews
Key result has been the reallocation of spending to match
government priorities
Main results of Spending Reviews over the past 10 years (2018)
19
Spending Reviews
Main challenges are the availability and quality of
performance information
Main challenges for the implementation of spending
reviews’ results/recommendations (2018)
1. Continued increase in number of countries conducting
Spending Reviews
2. Focus is moving away from short-term budget cuts to
– a more medium-term view on efficiency
– improved programme impact
– alignment of spending with government priorities
3. Main challenges are the quality and availability of
performance information
20
Spending Review (SR) – Key Observations
Part III – Evaluation
21
2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
22
Evaluation
Mainly conducted by line ministries and agencies
Governance of ex-ante and ex-post evaluation (2018)
in number of countries
23
Evaluation
Continues to have a limited budgetary impact
How often are evaluation findings used during budget negotiations
between the CBA and line ministries? (2018)
24
Evaluation
Findings have more influence on budget allocations at the
decentralised level (programmes) than at CBA
25
Evaluation
A big constraint is the lack of a formal mechanism to consider
evaluation findings in the budget process
Main constraints limiting the use of evaluation evidence
in budgeting (2018)
1. Evaluations are mainly conducted by line ministries
and agencies
2. Budgetary impact
– Evaluation continues to have a limited budgetary impact
– More influence on decentralised level (programmes) than
at CBA
3. A big constraint is the lack of a formal mechanism to
consider evaluation findings in the budget process
26
Evaluation – Key Observations
THANK YOU
For more information, contact:
andrew.blazey@oecd.org
anne.keller@oecd.org

Developments in performance budgeting - Andrew Blazey, OECD Secretariat

  • 1.
    2018 OECD PerformanceBudgeting Survey Key Findings and trends Andrew Blazey and Anne Keller 14th Annual Meeting of the OECD Asian SBO Bangkok, Thailand 13 – 14 December 2018
  • 2.
    “A single flagship publicationfor SBO” What is the “state of the art” in modern budgeting? What are the key challenges that countries face? Context I: OECD Budgeting Flagship Publication 2
  • 3.
    Budgeting within fiscal objectives Context II: OECDFramework of Modern Budgeting Quality, integrity & independent audit Performance, Evaluation & VFM Comprehensi ve budget accounting Effective budget execution Alignment with medium- term strategic plans and priorities Performance, evaluation & VFM Transparency, openness & accessibility Participative, Inclusive & Realistic Debate Fiscal Risks & Sustainability Capital budgeting framework 3
  • 4.
    • Fifth OECDPB Survey • Coverage: 45 questions on Performance Budgeting Spending Review Evaluation • Respondents mainly from CBAs • Response rate: 33 countries (out of 35) • Some data cleaning is ongoing  all 2018 data in this presentation is coming from the 2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey 4 2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
  • 5.
    Part I –Performance Budgeting 5 2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
  • 6.
    6 Performance Budgeting Use ofperformance frameworks continues to increase over time and are the norm across the OECD
  • 7.
    7 Performance Budgeting Target settingtends to be done by line ministries, and its coverage varies Coverage of performance targets (2018) Responsibility for target setting (2018)
  • 8.
    8 Performance Budgeting Increased useof performance information - across a broad range of stakeholders – is observed over the last 5 years Number of countries
  • 9.
    9 Performance Budgeting Spending Reviewinformation is becoming more important and is more likely to be used during budget negotiations
  • 10.
    10 Performance Budgeting The greatestbenefits are increased transparency about objectives, and the quality and usefulness of performance information
  • 11.
    11 Performance Budgeting Coordination problemsare the biggest challenge Main challenges for the implementation of performance budgeting (2018)
  • 12.
    12 Performance Budgeting Gender isone of the thematic objectives most likely to be systematically integrated into performance frameworks Indicators of cross cutting or thematic objectives in the budget (2018)
  • 13.
    13 Performance Budgeting Sustainable DevelopmentGoals (SDGs) are not yet systematically reflected in performance frameworks Reflection of SDG targets and indicators in national frameworks (2018)
  • 14.
    1. Use ofperformance frameworks continues to increase over time and are the norm across the OECD 2. Target setting tends to be the responsibility of line ministries and coverage across programmes varies 3. Over recent years, increased use of performance information - by a broad range of stakeholders - has been observed 4. Spending Review information is becoming more important and is increasingly likely to be used during budget negotiations 5. Performance Budgeting has increased the transparency of programme objectives and the quality and usefulness of performance information 6. Coordination problems are the biggest challenge for Performance Budgeting 14 Performance Budgeting (PB) – Key Observations
  • 15.
    Part II –Spending Review 15 2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
  • 16.
    16 Spending Reviews Continued increasein number of countries conducting spending reviews Adoption of spending reviews (2011-2018)
  • 17.
    17 Spending Reviews Focus ismoving away from short-term budget cuts to a more medium- term view on efficiency and an improved programme impact Main objectives of Spending Reviews over the past 10 years (2018)
  • 18.
    18 Spending Reviews Key resulthas been the reallocation of spending to match government priorities Main results of Spending Reviews over the past 10 years (2018)
  • 19.
    19 Spending Reviews Main challengesare the availability and quality of performance information Main challenges for the implementation of spending reviews’ results/recommendations (2018)
  • 20.
    1. Continued increasein number of countries conducting Spending Reviews 2. Focus is moving away from short-term budget cuts to – a more medium-term view on efficiency – improved programme impact – alignment of spending with government priorities 3. Main challenges are the quality and availability of performance information 20 Spending Review (SR) – Key Observations
  • 21.
    Part III –Evaluation 21 2018 OECD Performance Budgeting Survey
  • 22.
    22 Evaluation Mainly conducted byline ministries and agencies Governance of ex-ante and ex-post evaluation (2018) in number of countries
  • 23.
    23 Evaluation Continues to havea limited budgetary impact How often are evaluation findings used during budget negotiations between the CBA and line ministries? (2018)
  • 24.
    24 Evaluation Findings have moreinfluence on budget allocations at the decentralised level (programmes) than at CBA
  • 25.
    25 Evaluation A big constraintis the lack of a formal mechanism to consider evaluation findings in the budget process Main constraints limiting the use of evaluation evidence in budgeting (2018)
  • 26.
    1. Evaluations aremainly conducted by line ministries and agencies 2. Budgetary impact – Evaluation continues to have a limited budgetary impact – More influence on decentralised level (programmes) than at CBA 3. A big constraint is the lack of a formal mechanism to consider evaluation findings in the budget process 26 Evaluation – Key Observations
  • 27.
    THANK YOU For moreinformation, contact: andrew.blazey@oecd.org anne.keller@oecd.org