Dependency inversion
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•49 views
This document discusses the fifth principle of SOLID, Dependency Inversion. It states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules, but instead both should depend on abstractions. Additionally, abstractions should not depend on details, but details should depend on abstractions. Dependency injection is described as giving components their dependencies through constructors, methods, or fields. Advantages of dependency injection include decoupling, testability, and reusability, while disadvantages include increased code complexity.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Dependency Inversion
This document discusses dependency inversion and dependency injection. It defines dependency inversion as "high level modules should not depend on low level modules. Both should depend on abstractions" and "abstractions should not depend on details. Details should depend on abstractions." It explains inversion of control (IoC) and dependency injection (DI) as related concepts where the goal is to reduce coupling between modules by having dependencies injected through constructors, setters, or interfaces rather than directly instantiating objects. Code examples and references for further reading on dependency injection are provided.
S.O.L.I.D: Principles of OOP and Agile design
This document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented programming and agile design. It defines each principle: single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation, and dependency inversion. For each principle, it provides an example of how to apply the principle to code through refactoring existing code. It also discusses object-oriented concepts like polymorphism that relate to the SOLID principles.
Dependency Injection in .NET
This document provides an overview of dependency injection in .NET, including:
- The SOLID principles and examples demonstrating each principle
- An overview of the Inversion of Control (IoC) pattern and Dependency Injection (DI)
- Service lifetimes in DI and the .NET dependency injection container
- The four main DI patterns: constructor injection, property injection, method injection, and ambient context injection
- Demos showing examples of implementing IoC and each DI pattern
Solid design principles
SOLID is a popular set of five design principles for object-oriented software development. The principles are: Single Responsibility Principle, which states that a class should have one responsibility; Open/Closed Principle, which states that code should be open for extension but closed for modification; Liskov Substitution Principle, which states that subclasses should not break the functionality of parent classes; Interface Segregation Principle, which states that clients should not depend on interfaces they do not use; and Dependency Inversion Principle, which states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules and abstractions should not depend on details.
20080531 Intro To Dependency Injection & Inversion Of Control
Donn Felker will present on dependency injection and inversion of control. He has 8 years of experience developing enterprise solutions and various technical certifications. He will define dependencies and dependency injection, discuss the pros and cons of dependency injection, and demonstrate examples of dependency injection and inversion of control using a custom dependency container and the Microsoft Unity container. Resources from the presentation will be made available on his blog.
Common Design Patterns.pptx
This document discusses common design patterns and SOLID principles. It provides code examples and analysis of the Single Responsibility Principle, Open Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It also summarizes the Factory Method, Strategy, Abstract Factory, and Bridge design patterns and analyzes how they relate to the SOLID principles.
Solid OO & Clean Coding is essential to successful Agile development
some principles I have learned from people far cleverer than I, that will help design software that will remain maintainable in an agile environment
SOLID design principles in Ruby
The document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented design, which are Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. It defines each principle, provides examples of how to apply it in code, and explains how following the principles can help create code that is loosely coupled, highly cohesive, reusable, and easily testable.
Recommended
Dependency Inversion
This document discusses dependency inversion and dependency injection. It defines dependency inversion as "high level modules should not depend on low level modules. Both should depend on abstractions" and "abstractions should not depend on details. Details should depend on abstractions." It explains inversion of control (IoC) and dependency injection (DI) as related concepts where the goal is to reduce coupling between modules by having dependencies injected through constructors, setters, or interfaces rather than directly instantiating objects. Code examples and references for further reading on dependency injection are provided.
S.O.L.I.D: Principles of OOP and Agile design
This document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented programming and agile design. It defines each principle: single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation, and dependency inversion. For each principle, it provides an example of how to apply the principle to code through refactoring existing code. It also discusses object-oriented concepts like polymorphism that relate to the SOLID principles.
Dependency Injection in .NET
This document provides an overview of dependency injection in .NET, including:
- The SOLID principles and examples demonstrating each principle
- An overview of the Inversion of Control (IoC) pattern and Dependency Injection (DI)
- Service lifetimes in DI and the .NET dependency injection container
- The four main DI patterns: constructor injection, property injection, method injection, and ambient context injection
- Demos showing examples of implementing IoC and each DI pattern
Solid design principles
SOLID is a popular set of five design principles for object-oriented software development. The principles are: Single Responsibility Principle, which states that a class should have one responsibility; Open/Closed Principle, which states that code should be open for extension but closed for modification; Liskov Substitution Principle, which states that subclasses should not break the functionality of parent classes; Interface Segregation Principle, which states that clients should not depend on interfaces they do not use; and Dependency Inversion Principle, which states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules and abstractions should not depend on details.
20080531 Intro To Dependency Injection & Inversion Of Control
Donn Felker will present on dependency injection and inversion of control. He has 8 years of experience developing enterprise solutions and various technical certifications. He will define dependencies and dependency injection, discuss the pros and cons of dependency injection, and demonstrate examples of dependency injection and inversion of control using a custom dependency container and the Microsoft Unity container. Resources from the presentation will be made available on his blog.
Common Design Patterns.pptx
This document discusses common design patterns and SOLID principles. It provides code examples and analysis of the Single Responsibility Principle, Open Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It also summarizes the Factory Method, Strategy, Abstract Factory, and Bridge design patterns and analyzes how they relate to the SOLID principles.
Solid OO & Clean Coding is essential to successful Agile development
some principles I have learned from people far cleverer than I, that will help design software that will remain maintainable in an agile environment
SOLID design principles in Ruby
The document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented design, which are Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. It defines each principle, provides examples of how to apply it in code, and explains how following the principles can help create code that is loosely coupled, highly cohesive, reusable, and easily testable.
The OO Design Principles
The document discusses several object-oriented (OO) design principles including the single responsibility principle (SRP), open-closed principle (OCP), Liskov substitution principle (LSP), interface segregation principle (ISP), and dependency inversion principle (DIP). It also discusses design patterns, refactoring, and design by contract (DBC) as ways to prevent software decay over time and improve design quality. The key OO principles guide developers to create flexible, maintainable and reusable software designs.
[Android] DI in multimodule application
Ever wonder how to organize dependency injection in a multi-module app? In this presentation, we'll look at the production solution that is used in the 150+ module app
Inversion of Control in MVC
The document discusses inversion of control (IoC) and dependency injection (DI) in ASP.NET MVC. It explains the SOLID principles, different types of DI like constructor injection and interface injection. IoC inverts control by introducing a container to manage class dependencies rather than the classes directly depending on each other. The document provides examples of using an IoC container to resolve dependencies for an MVC controller and power source for a laptop. It also discusses creating a custom controller factory in MVC.
Dependency Injection
This document discusses dependency injection, including:
- Dependency injection is a technique for loosely coupling code through composition rather than inheritance and programming to interfaces rather than implementations.
- Volatile dependencies that introduce external configuration or are still in development should be injected, while stable dependencies will not introduce breaking changes.
- Different patterns for dependency injection include constructor injection, property injection, method injection, and ambient context.
- Anti-patterns to avoid include control freak, bastard injection, service locator, and constrained construction patterns.
- Frameworks like ASP.NET MVC, WPF, and WCF can implement dependency injection by composing applications in places like the global.asax file, OnStartup method, and service host factories
Design Patterns: From STUPID to SOLID code
This document discusses principles and patterns of software design, including the singleton pattern, code smells, and design principles like the single responsibility principle, open/closed principle, Liskov substitution principle, interface segregation principle, and dependency inversion principle. It also covers design patterns like template method, strategy, decorator, visitor, and separated interface. The key principles are to consider what should be variable in design, program to interfaces, separate responsibilities, and favor composition over inheritance.
Android architecture
The document discusses SOLID principles and architecture patterns in Android development. It describes the five SOLID principles - single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation, and dependency inversion. It then explains popular architecture patterns like MVC, MVP, and MVVM and compares their advantages and disadvantages. The goal of SOLID and these patterns is to make code more reusable, maintainable, flexible and suitable for team development.
SOLID Design Principles for Test Automaion
The document summarizes the SOLID design principles for test automation. It begins by introducing the five SOLID principles - Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. Each principle is then defined individually and examples are provided for how they could be applied to test automation. The benefits of applying each SOLID principle to test automation are discussed, including improved testability, lower coupling, organization, code maintenance, reusability, and overall architectural stability and flexibility.
Dependency injection
Dependency Injection (DI) is a technique for achieving Inversion of Control (IoC) by externalizing a class's dependencies, allowing them to be injected from external sources rather than being directly hard coded. DI promotes loose coupling between classes and separation of concerns by making code depend on abstractions rather than concretions. DI can be applied through constructor injection, property injection, method injection, or ambient context. Popular DI containers include Castle Windsor, StructureMap, Spring.NET, and Ninject, which help configure and manage object lifetimes and interception.
King Tut Architecture
King Tut Architecture: Pyramids, Patterns, and Tests
as presented to the Chicago ALM User Group on April 8th, 2015
Android MVVM TDD
GDG Seoul Meetup 2015/03/27
Android MVVM and TDD
sample project: https://github.com/moltak/android_mvvm_for_pt
SOLID Software Principles with C#
This document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented design: Single Responsibility Principle, Open Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It explains that SOLID is a collection of best practices that can be applied to design to achieve loose coupling and high maintainability. Each principle is then defined in one sentence and an example demo is provided to illustrate applying that principle.
Dependency Inversion Principle
The document discusses the dependency inversion principle, which states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules, but that both should depend on abstractions. It also discusses inversion of control and dependency injection, which help to decouple modules and make them less dependent on specific implementations. The use of a dependency injection container can help manage object lifecycles and dependencies between classes.
Principle of OOD
Principle of OOD:
Basic OOP Concept
Single Responsibility Principly
Open Close Principle
Liskov Subtitution Principle
Dependency Inversion Principle
Interface Segregation Principle
Dependency Injection
Boost the quality of your code by learning how to use the patterns and principles of dependency injection!
Is your code solid
This document discusses the SOLID principles of good software design: Single Responsibility Principle, Open/Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It explains the purpose of each principle, how to apply it, and why it is important for creating code that is loosely coupled, highly cohesive, and easy to evolve over time. Following these principles can help minimize design flaws and result in code that is simpler, more maintainable and easier to test.
Daniel leon design principles in the functional world
This document discusses design principles in functional programming. It defines the differences between principles and patterns, with principles being more abstract rules and patterns being concrete examples. It outlines common object-oriented design principles like single responsibility, open/closed, and Liskov substitution and discusses how they can also apply to functional programming by focusing on functions instead of classes. The document concludes that principles are more abstract than patterns and that an over reliance on patterns can show a lack of underlying principle implementation in a language.
Solid
This document discusses SOLID principles for object oriented design. It begins with an introduction of the author and overview of topics to be covered. It then reviews basic OOP concepts and code smells to refactor. The main section defines the five SOLID principles: single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation and dependency inversion. For each, it provides a definition, examples of conforming and non-conforming code, and discusses how it improves design. It closes with other agile/OOP principles and inviting questions.
CodeCamp Iasi 10 march 2012 - Scratching-SOLID
The document summarizes the five SOLID principles of object-oriented design: single responsibility principle (SRP), open/closed principle (OCP), Liskov substitution principle (LSP), interface segregation principle (ISP), and dependency inversion principle (DIP). It provides definitions and examples for each principle focusing on concepts like cohesion, coupling, and substitutability. It also attributes the SOLID acronym and principles to Robert C. Martin.
IoC and Mapper in C#
This document discusses SOLID principles, dependency inversion, dependency injection, and AutoMapper. It covers the benefits of loose coupling code using dependency injection such as improved testability and separation of concerns, as well as potential downsides like increased complexity. It provides examples of dependency injection frameworks like Unity and Ninject and demonstrates how AutoMapper can simplify mapping between objects.
Entity Framework: To the Unit of Work Design Pattern and Beyond
The document discusses issues with traditional ASP.NET application architectures and how the introduction of MVC helped address some problems. It then describes how the presenter implemented the Unit of Work pattern to help with testing and database consistency in their application. However, this implementation violated SOLID principles. The presenter improved the design by separating concerns into distinct layers and implementing generic repositories. This made the code more testable and decoupled from Entity Framework while better adhering to object-oriented design principles. In the end, the presenter advocates evaluating design patterns critically and continuously challenging accepted approaches.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
More Related Content
Similar to Dependency inversion
The OO Design Principles
The document discusses several object-oriented (OO) design principles including the single responsibility principle (SRP), open-closed principle (OCP), Liskov substitution principle (LSP), interface segregation principle (ISP), and dependency inversion principle (DIP). It also discusses design patterns, refactoring, and design by contract (DBC) as ways to prevent software decay over time and improve design quality. The key OO principles guide developers to create flexible, maintainable and reusable software designs.
[Android] DI in multimodule application
Ever wonder how to organize dependency injection in a multi-module app? In this presentation, we'll look at the production solution that is used in the 150+ module app
Inversion of Control in MVC
The document discusses inversion of control (IoC) and dependency injection (DI) in ASP.NET MVC. It explains the SOLID principles, different types of DI like constructor injection and interface injection. IoC inverts control by introducing a container to manage class dependencies rather than the classes directly depending on each other. The document provides examples of using an IoC container to resolve dependencies for an MVC controller and power source for a laptop. It also discusses creating a custom controller factory in MVC.
Dependency Injection
This document discusses dependency injection, including:
- Dependency injection is a technique for loosely coupling code through composition rather than inheritance and programming to interfaces rather than implementations.
- Volatile dependencies that introduce external configuration or are still in development should be injected, while stable dependencies will not introduce breaking changes.
- Different patterns for dependency injection include constructor injection, property injection, method injection, and ambient context.
- Anti-patterns to avoid include control freak, bastard injection, service locator, and constrained construction patterns.
- Frameworks like ASP.NET MVC, WPF, and WCF can implement dependency injection by composing applications in places like the global.asax file, OnStartup method, and service host factories
Design Patterns: From STUPID to SOLID code
This document discusses principles and patterns of software design, including the singleton pattern, code smells, and design principles like the single responsibility principle, open/closed principle, Liskov substitution principle, interface segregation principle, and dependency inversion principle. It also covers design patterns like template method, strategy, decorator, visitor, and separated interface. The key principles are to consider what should be variable in design, program to interfaces, separate responsibilities, and favor composition over inheritance.
Android architecture
The document discusses SOLID principles and architecture patterns in Android development. It describes the five SOLID principles - single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation, and dependency inversion. It then explains popular architecture patterns like MVC, MVP, and MVVM and compares their advantages and disadvantages. The goal of SOLID and these patterns is to make code more reusable, maintainable, flexible and suitable for team development.
SOLID Design Principles for Test Automaion
The document summarizes the SOLID design principles for test automation. It begins by introducing the five SOLID principles - Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. Each principle is then defined individually and examples are provided for how they could be applied to test automation. The benefits of applying each SOLID principle to test automation are discussed, including improved testability, lower coupling, organization, code maintenance, reusability, and overall architectural stability and flexibility.
Dependency injection
Dependency Injection (DI) is a technique for achieving Inversion of Control (IoC) by externalizing a class's dependencies, allowing them to be injected from external sources rather than being directly hard coded. DI promotes loose coupling between classes and separation of concerns by making code depend on abstractions rather than concretions. DI can be applied through constructor injection, property injection, method injection, or ambient context. Popular DI containers include Castle Windsor, StructureMap, Spring.NET, and Ninject, which help configure and manage object lifetimes and interception.
King Tut Architecture
King Tut Architecture: Pyramids, Patterns, and Tests
as presented to the Chicago ALM User Group on April 8th, 2015
Android MVVM TDD
GDG Seoul Meetup 2015/03/27
Android MVVM and TDD
sample project: https://github.com/moltak/android_mvvm_for_pt
SOLID Software Principles with C#
This document discusses the SOLID principles of object-oriented design: Single Responsibility Principle, Open Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It explains that SOLID is a collection of best practices that can be applied to design to achieve loose coupling and high maintainability. Each principle is then defined in one sentence and an example demo is provided to illustrate applying that principle.
Dependency Inversion Principle
The document discusses the dependency inversion principle, which states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules, but that both should depend on abstractions. It also discusses inversion of control and dependency injection, which help to decouple modules and make them less dependent on specific implementations. The use of a dependency injection container can help manage object lifecycles and dependencies between classes.
Principle of OOD
Principle of OOD:
Basic OOP Concept
Single Responsibility Principly
Open Close Principle
Liskov Subtitution Principle
Dependency Inversion Principle
Interface Segregation Principle
Dependency Injection
Boost the quality of your code by learning how to use the patterns and principles of dependency injection!
Is your code solid
This document discusses the SOLID principles of good software design: Single Responsibility Principle, Open/Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. It explains the purpose of each principle, how to apply it, and why it is important for creating code that is loosely coupled, highly cohesive, and easy to evolve over time. Following these principles can help minimize design flaws and result in code that is simpler, more maintainable and easier to test.
Daniel leon design principles in the functional world
This document discusses design principles in functional programming. It defines the differences between principles and patterns, with principles being more abstract rules and patterns being concrete examples. It outlines common object-oriented design principles like single responsibility, open/closed, and Liskov substitution and discusses how they can also apply to functional programming by focusing on functions instead of classes. The document concludes that principles are more abstract than patterns and that an over reliance on patterns can show a lack of underlying principle implementation in a language.
Solid
This document discusses SOLID principles for object oriented design. It begins with an introduction of the author and overview of topics to be covered. It then reviews basic OOP concepts and code smells to refactor. The main section defines the five SOLID principles: single responsibility, open/closed, Liskov substitution, interface segregation and dependency inversion. For each, it provides a definition, examples of conforming and non-conforming code, and discusses how it improves design. It closes with other agile/OOP principles and inviting questions.
CodeCamp Iasi 10 march 2012 - Scratching-SOLID
The document summarizes the five SOLID principles of object-oriented design: single responsibility principle (SRP), open/closed principle (OCP), Liskov substitution principle (LSP), interface segregation principle (ISP), and dependency inversion principle (DIP). It provides definitions and examples for each principle focusing on concepts like cohesion, coupling, and substitutability. It also attributes the SOLID acronym and principles to Robert C. Martin.
IoC and Mapper in C#
This document discusses SOLID principles, dependency inversion, dependency injection, and AutoMapper. It covers the benefits of loose coupling code using dependency injection such as improved testability and separation of concerns, as well as potential downsides like increased complexity. It provides examples of dependency injection frameworks like Unity and Ninject and demonstrates how AutoMapper can simplify mapping between objects.
Entity Framework: To the Unit of Work Design Pattern and Beyond
The document discusses issues with traditional ASP.NET application architectures and how the introduction of MVC helped address some problems. It then describes how the presenter implemented the Unit of Work pattern to help with testing and database consistency in their application. However, this implementation violated SOLID principles. The presenter improved the design by separating concerns into distinct layers and implementing generic repositories. This made the code more testable and decoupled from Entity Framework while better adhering to object-oriented design principles. In the end, the presenter advocates evaluating design patterns critically and continuously challenging accepted approaches.
Similar to Dependency inversion (20)
Daniel leon design principles in the functional world
Daniel leon design principles in the functional world
Entity Framework: To the Unit of Work Design Pattern and Beyond
Entity Framework: To the Unit of Work Design Pattern and Beyond
Recently uploaded
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptx
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
Deep Software Variability and Frictionless Reproducibility
Deep Software Variability and Frictionless ReproducibilityUniversity of Rennes, INSA Rennes, Inria/IRISA, CNRS
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
Equivariant neural networks and representation theory
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
Bob Reedy - Nitrate in Texas Groundwater.pdf
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business Meeting
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Thornton ESPP slides UK WW Network 4_6_24.pdf
ESPP presentation to EU Waste Water Network, 4th June 2024 “EU policies driving nutrient removal and recycling
and the revised UWWTD (Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive)”
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
Plant breeding for disease resistance is a strategy to reduce crop losses caused by disease. Plants have an innate immune system that allows them to recognize pathogens and provide resistance. However, breeding for long-lasting resistance often involves combining multiple resistance genes
Recently uploaded (20)
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptx
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptx
Deep Software Variability and Frictionless Reproducibility
Deep Software Variability and Frictionless Reproducibility
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
Equivariant neural networks and representation theory
Equivariant neural networks and representation theory
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
Dependency inversion
- 1. Dependency Inversion S.O.L.I.D Fifth principle
- 2. What are we going to talk about? - What is S.O.L.I.D - Dependency inversion and dependency injection - Code examples of dependency injection
- 3. S.O.L.I.D S.O.L.I.D stands for Five basic principles of object-oriented programming and design. Those principles are: 1.Single responsibility 2.Open/Closed 3.Liskov substitution 4.Interface segregation 5.Dependency inversion
- 4. Dependency Inversion 1.High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions. 2.Abstractions should not depend on details. Details should depend on abstractions.
- 8. Dependency Injection Dependency injection is where components are given their dependencies through their constructors, methods, or directly into fields. - Constructor injection - Setter injection - Property injection - Reflection injection