As attorneys who represent hundreds of unaccompanied children and asylum seekers from Central America, we write this letter to respectfully demand that you rescind the Section M, “Accountability Measures to Protect Alien Children from Exploitation and Prevent Abuses of Our Immigration Laws” of the February 20, 2017 memorandum entitled “Implementing the Presidnet’s Enforcement Improvement Policies” given that it is in direct violation of the Flores v. Meese Settlement (“Flores”) and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (PUBLIC LAW 110–457—DEC. 23, 2008) (“TVPRA”)
Structure of The Birth Certificate - Are You Chattel?Chuck Thompson
We can neither confirm nor deny the information in this article but it is very interesting. We did not write it and use it under fair use laws as it will eventually be posted on our main website. http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com Visit us for real solutions.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit seeking to reunite an asylum-seeking mother and her 7-year-old daughter fleeing violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo, only to be forcibly torn from each other in the U.S. and detained separately 2,000 miles apart.
On June 26, 2018, the court issued 2 orders (1) granting preliminary injunction and (2) certifying class action status.
This order was uploaded by me, Josh Goldstein. I'm an immigration lawyer in Los Angeles, California. You can reach me at:
http://www.immigrationlawyerslosangeles.com/
Law Offices of Joshua L Goldstein, PC
811 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
I am licensed to practice law in Massachusetts, New York. I practice immigration and nationality law in all 50 states and around the world. Not licensed to practice law in California.
CGRS and Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) have collaborated to produce an important report urging lawmakers to reform the U.S. immigration system for migrant children who are coming to our borders with surging frequency. They come, often unaccompanied by an adult, in search of safety, stability, and protection. These children face a system that was created for adults, does not provide them legal counsel, and is not required to consider the child’s best interests, despite the potentially enormous impact of the proceedings on the child’s life and future.
11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION
REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M.
11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals…
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
This listing of immigration terms, from a to z, provides easy-to-grasp, jargon-minimized tips and definitions, as well as examples taken from various writings and blog posts of Immigration Attorney Carlos Batara.
These terms pertain to several major areas of immigration law, including family visas and marriage-based petitions, permanent resident programs, citizenship and naturalization, deportation and removal defense, immigration appeals, humanitarian programs involving asylum, refugees, TPS, and trafficking victims, as well as immigrant domestic violence protections, such as VAWA and U visas.
Immigration law is one of the toughest areas of law because rules are consistently changing due to the political ramifications of international policy measures.
This A - Z presentation hopes to provide insight on many of the commonly asked questions asked by immigrants and immigration reform advocates.
Structure of The Birth Certificate - Are You Chattel?Chuck Thompson
We can neither confirm nor deny the information in this article but it is very interesting. We did not write it and use it under fair use laws as it will eventually be posted on our main website. http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com Visit us for real solutions.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit seeking to reunite an asylum-seeking mother and her 7-year-old daughter fleeing violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo, only to be forcibly torn from each other in the U.S. and detained separately 2,000 miles apart.
On June 26, 2018, the court issued 2 orders (1) granting preliminary injunction and (2) certifying class action status.
This order was uploaded by me, Josh Goldstein. I'm an immigration lawyer in Los Angeles, California. You can reach me at:
http://www.immigrationlawyerslosangeles.com/
Law Offices of Joshua L Goldstein, PC
811 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
I am licensed to practice law in Massachusetts, New York. I practice immigration and nationality law in all 50 states and around the world. Not licensed to practice law in California.
CGRS and Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) have collaborated to produce an important report urging lawmakers to reform the U.S. immigration system for migrant children who are coming to our borders with surging frequency. They come, often unaccompanied by an adult, in search of safety, stability, and protection. These children face a system that was created for adults, does not provide them legal counsel, and is not required to consider the child’s best interests, despite the potentially enormous impact of the proceedings on the child’s life and future.
11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION
REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M.
11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals…
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
This listing of immigration terms, from a to z, provides easy-to-grasp, jargon-minimized tips and definitions, as well as examples taken from various writings and blog posts of Immigration Attorney Carlos Batara.
These terms pertain to several major areas of immigration law, including family visas and marriage-based petitions, permanent resident programs, citizenship and naturalization, deportation and removal defense, immigration appeals, humanitarian programs involving asylum, refugees, TPS, and trafficking victims, as well as immigrant domestic violence protections, such as VAWA and U visas.
Immigration law is one of the toughest areas of law because rules are consistently changing due to the political ramifications of international policy measures.
This A - Z presentation hopes to provide insight on many of the commonly asked questions asked by immigrants and immigration reform advocates.
101017 NEWSOME REQUEST STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION (First Heritage Credit)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
REQUEST FOR STATUS OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION INVESTIGATION – EEOC CHARGE NO. 423-2015-00802 - - Vogel Denise Newsome vs. First Heritage Credit LLC
This EEOC Charge is a matter of PUBLIC Record and one of HIGH-PROFILE Status as it is also a document that is of HISTORICAL value and will be used in bringing about the “TOTAL COLLAPSE” of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and that is CONTROLLED and RUN by Nazis/WHITE Jews-Zionists-Supremacist.
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome was asked to submit a “WRITTEN” Request for the STATUS of the INVESTIGATION!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100417-newsomes-phone-conversations-with-eeoc-fhc-matter
EVIDENCE (such as this document) which LEGALLY and LAWFULLY allows for Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome to DIRECTLY seek “INTERNATIONAL” Assistance in the OVERTHROW of the World’s NO. 1 “DESPOTISM” Government Regime/Organization that is Controlled/Run by Nazi/WHITE Jews-Zionist-Supremacists who engage in CONSPIRACIES that are Terrorist and Racist Oriented!
FAILURE TO ACT and FAILURE TO SURRENDER by the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime/Organization HAVE RESULTED in MORE Conspiracies involving “Domestic” and “INTERNATIONAL” Terrorist/Racist Attacks that has ultimately LED to its OWN DEMISE! LOL!
DONATE TO SUPPORT AT: https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
11/11/19 International Criminal Court-Notice of Amicus Curiae Written Submiss...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Notice That The Utica International Embassy’s Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Will Provide Amicus Curiae Written Submission For The Appeals Hearing Of 4-6 December
Request For Protective Witness Services – VICTIMS and WITNESS UNIT
Notice To Request United Nations Police Services…
Update On The Formal Criminal Charges Regarding the Situation In The United States of America
Request For REPARATION, RESTITUTION and SETTING UP Of TRUST FUND(S)
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
California child custody and visitation modificationsLegalDocsPro
Child custody and visitation modifications in California
are the topic of this issue of the weekly legal newsletter from LegalDocsPro. This is issue number 72. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since...
04/30/18 Washington County Mississippi's KU KLUX KLAN Members KIDNAP A Citize...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
When the WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI’s
NAZIs and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists
- i.e. As The KU KLUX KLAN’s MEMBERS - -
KIDNAP A CITIZEN (Cary Johnson) OF THE
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’s
“NEW” GOVERNMENT- - -
The UIE’s INTERIM PRIME MINISTER
VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
MOVED INTO ACTION!
Estate Planning for the Non Traditional FamilyBarry Siegal
Historically, most estate plans revolved around the nuclear family structure of husband and wife who were married for the first time and children that were born of that marriage.
Over the course of the last 20 plus years, divorce rates have increased, more opposite-sex couples are opting to live together without getting married, and there is a greater awareness of same sex couples who are committed to each other. In these situations the traditional approach of estate planning is not always appropriate.
For purposes of this presentation, the “non-traditional family” consists of either a same sex couple, whether or not recognized as “married” for state law purposes, as well as the opposite sex couple who are committed to each other, but for one reason or another have decided not to get married.
1 Although opposite sex couples who have previously been married and have children by a prior marriage are also considered a “non-traditional family” and have unique issues, this relationship will not be addressed in this presentation.
Article 1-26
Disclaimer:
All of the pictures and pieces of information on this site are the property of their respective owners. I do not hold any copyright in regards to these pictures and information. These pictures have been collected from different public sources including various websites, considered to be in the public domain. If anyone has any objection to display of any picture, image or information, it may be brought to my notice by sending an email (contact me) & the disputed media will be removed immediately, after verification of the claim.
Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF) is an organization founded to support the enhancement of family values in Kenya, with four key pillars namely Life, Family, Religion and Governance. We are an advocacy and networking organization made up of Christian professionals from diverse Christian groups and churches, from diverse professional backgrounds, but all committed to supporting a pro-life, pro-family, pro-religion and good-governance social environment
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE MATTER:
As a matter of PUBLIC NOTIFICATION, we provide this document for purposes of informing and educating the PUBLIC/WORLD on the UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices of FINANCIAL Institutions in the United States – i.e. for instance Mississippi – and HOW the United States’ DESPOT’s Nazi and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists are going about engaging in CRIMINAL Acts for the purposes of THEFT, etc. of the Lands/Territories of Natives, Native Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color.
Reverend Cary Johnson wants this information shared with the PUBLIC/WORLD in hopes that it will EXPOSE how he as well as MANY others have been VICTIMIZED and seeks JUSTICE and RESTITUTION, etc. for the INJURIES/HARM he has sustained as a direct and/proximate result of the “FORECLOSURE SCAMS” being run by the United States’ DESPOT’s Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and CO-Conspirators as Butler Snow O’Mara Stevens & Cannada and CLIENTS - such as Planters Bank - and other CORRUPT Law Firms as the Crawford Law Firm (Greenville, MS).
According to Planters Bank Representative (Parker England), Mr. Johnson was NOTIFIED via CERTIFIED Mail Return Receipt – when he was NOT. England also STATES going to Mr. Johnson’s MAILBOX:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/112917-meeting-with-parker-england-planters-bank-regarding-cary-johnson
However, when asked for PROOF, was advised that Attorney (Nick Crawford) can provide us with such evidence. HOWEVER, from this Video/Audio there is NO evidence of Mr. Johnson being NOTIFIED via Certified Mail/RETURNED Receipt as required by LAW. Furthermore, Attorney Nick Crawford CONFIRMS this LEGALLY and MANDATORY method of Service was NOT performed!
It is within the Legal and Lawful ramification as well as the SAFETY and PROTECTION of our Rights and Duties preserved under the Constitution as well as other Statutes/Laws of the United States of America and International Laws that we are INVESTIGATING and EXPOSING such Criminal Attacks – i.e. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, CRIMES AGAINST PEACE, etc. – wherein LAWYERS, JUDGES and LAW ENFORCEMENT Agencies are being USED to carry out such attacks and THREATEN the LIVELIHOOD of Natives, Native Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color who CHALLENGE the United States’ DESPOT and the WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that control and run its EMPIRE!
You can GIVE LOVE DONATIONS To Support The Work At:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
ANONYMOUS/CONFIDENTIAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE & LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
01/07/19 UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY'S Response To USA Shutdown & STATUS Of C...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Utica International Embassy’s RESPONSE to the USA’s Government SHUTDOWN and THREATS by the USA’s President Donald Trump to impose a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” if he does NOT get the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS he, his Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) and their CO-Conspirators (i.e. Israel, etc.) seek to EXTORT through such RANSOM Demands as they NOW hold Americans HOSTAGE! The UIE “WILL USE” such TERRORIST Acts of the USA’s DESPOTISM Government Regime to its advantage should such a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” be made which WILL SUPPORT the UIE’s WAR ON TERRORISM against the USA’s Government Officials – i.e. Nazis and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
The UIE has also UPDATED the Counts (approximately 65) for the United States Department of Justice Criminal Complaint/International Criminal Court Communication being drafted and will be using the USA HOSTAGE Crisis of the Americans and the THREATS that have been leveled AGAINST the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters.
With Warmest Regards,
Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Utica International Embassy
(888) 700-5056
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
101017 NEWSOME REQUEST STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION (First Heritage Credit)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
REQUEST FOR STATUS OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION INVESTIGATION – EEOC CHARGE NO. 423-2015-00802 - - Vogel Denise Newsome vs. First Heritage Credit LLC
This EEOC Charge is a matter of PUBLIC Record and one of HIGH-PROFILE Status as it is also a document that is of HISTORICAL value and will be used in bringing about the “TOTAL COLLAPSE” of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and that is CONTROLLED and RUN by Nazis/WHITE Jews-Zionists-Supremacist.
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome was asked to submit a “WRITTEN” Request for the STATUS of the INVESTIGATION!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100417-newsomes-phone-conversations-with-eeoc-fhc-matter
EVIDENCE (such as this document) which LEGALLY and LAWFULLY allows for Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome to DIRECTLY seek “INTERNATIONAL” Assistance in the OVERTHROW of the World’s NO. 1 “DESPOTISM” Government Regime/Organization that is Controlled/Run by Nazi/WHITE Jews-Zionist-Supremacists who engage in CONSPIRACIES that are Terrorist and Racist Oriented!
FAILURE TO ACT and FAILURE TO SURRENDER by the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime/Organization HAVE RESULTED in MORE Conspiracies involving “Domestic” and “INTERNATIONAL” Terrorist/Racist Attacks that has ultimately LED to its OWN DEMISE! LOL!
DONATE TO SUPPORT AT: https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
11/11/19 International Criminal Court-Notice of Amicus Curiae Written Submiss...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Notice That The Utica International Embassy’s Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Will Provide Amicus Curiae Written Submission For The Appeals Hearing Of 4-6 December
Request For Protective Witness Services – VICTIMS and WITNESS UNIT
Notice To Request United Nations Police Services…
Update On The Formal Criminal Charges Regarding the Situation In The United States of America
Request For REPARATION, RESTITUTION and SETTING UP Of TRUST FUND(S)
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
California child custody and visitation modificationsLegalDocsPro
Child custody and visitation modifications in California
are the topic of this issue of the weekly legal newsletter from LegalDocsPro. This is issue number 72. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since...
04/30/18 Washington County Mississippi's KU KLUX KLAN Members KIDNAP A Citize...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
When the WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI’s
NAZIs and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists
- i.e. As The KU KLUX KLAN’s MEMBERS - -
KIDNAP A CITIZEN (Cary Johnson) OF THE
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’s
“NEW” GOVERNMENT- - -
The UIE’s INTERIM PRIME MINISTER
VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
MOVED INTO ACTION!
Estate Planning for the Non Traditional FamilyBarry Siegal
Historically, most estate plans revolved around the nuclear family structure of husband and wife who were married for the first time and children that were born of that marriage.
Over the course of the last 20 plus years, divorce rates have increased, more opposite-sex couples are opting to live together without getting married, and there is a greater awareness of same sex couples who are committed to each other. In these situations the traditional approach of estate planning is not always appropriate.
For purposes of this presentation, the “non-traditional family” consists of either a same sex couple, whether or not recognized as “married” for state law purposes, as well as the opposite sex couple who are committed to each other, but for one reason or another have decided not to get married.
1 Although opposite sex couples who have previously been married and have children by a prior marriage are also considered a “non-traditional family” and have unique issues, this relationship will not be addressed in this presentation.
Article 1-26
Disclaimer:
All of the pictures and pieces of information on this site are the property of their respective owners. I do not hold any copyright in regards to these pictures and information. These pictures have been collected from different public sources including various websites, considered to be in the public domain. If anyone has any objection to display of any picture, image or information, it may be brought to my notice by sending an email (contact me) & the disputed media will be removed immediately, after verification of the claim.
Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF) is an organization founded to support the enhancement of family values in Kenya, with four key pillars namely Life, Family, Religion and Governance. We are an advocacy and networking organization made up of Christian professionals from diverse Christian groups and churches, from diverse professional backgrounds, but all committed to supporting a pro-life, pro-family, pro-religion and good-governance social environment
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE MATTER:
As a matter of PUBLIC NOTIFICATION, we provide this document for purposes of informing and educating the PUBLIC/WORLD on the UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices of FINANCIAL Institutions in the United States – i.e. for instance Mississippi – and HOW the United States’ DESPOT’s Nazi and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists are going about engaging in CRIMINAL Acts for the purposes of THEFT, etc. of the Lands/Territories of Natives, Native Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color.
Reverend Cary Johnson wants this information shared with the PUBLIC/WORLD in hopes that it will EXPOSE how he as well as MANY others have been VICTIMIZED and seeks JUSTICE and RESTITUTION, etc. for the INJURIES/HARM he has sustained as a direct and/proximate result of the “FORECLOSURE SCAMS” being run by the United States’ DESPOT’s Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and CO-Conspirators as Butler Snow O’Mara Stevens & Cannada and CLIENTS - such as Planters Bank - and other CORRUPT Law Firms as the Crawford Law Firm (Greenville, MS).
According to Planters Bank Representative (Parker England), Mr. Johnson was NOTIFIED via CERTIFIED Mail Return Receipt – when he was NOT. England also STATES going to Mr. Johnson’s MAILBOX:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/112917-meeting-with-parker-england-planters-bank-regarding-cary-johnson
However, when asked for PROOF, was advised that Attorney (Nick Crawford) can provide us with such evidence. HOWEVER, from this Video/Audio there is NO evidence of Mr. Johnson being NOTIFIED via Certified Mail/RETURNED Receipt as required by LAW. Furthermore, Attorney Nick Crawford CONFIRMS this LEGALLY and MANDATORY method of Service was NOT performed!
It is within the Legal and Lawful ramification as well as the SAFETY and PROTECTION of our Rights and Duties preserved under the Constitution as well as other Statutes/Laws of the United States of America and International Laws that we are INVESTIGATING and EXPOSING such Criminal Attacks – i.e. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, CRIMES AGAINST PEACE, etc. – wherein LAWYERS, JUDGES and LAW ENFORCEMENT Agencies are being USED to carry out such attacks and THREATEN the LIVELIHOOD of Natives, Native Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color who CHALLENGE the United States’ DESPOT and the WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that control and run its EMPIRE!
You can GIVE LOVE DONATIONS To Support The Work At:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
ANONYMOUS/CONFIDENTIAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE & LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
01/07/19 UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY'S Response To USA Shutdown & STATUS Of C...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Utica International Embassy’s RESPONSE to the USA’s Government SHUTDOWN and THREATS by the USA’s President Donald Trump to impose a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” if he does NOT get the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS he, his Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) and their CO-Conspirators (i.e. Israel, etc.) seek to EXTORT through such RANSOM Demands as they NOW hold Americans HOSTAGE! The UIE “WILL USE” such TERRORIST Acts of the USA’s DESPOTISM Government Regime to its advantage should such a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” be made which WILL SUPPORT the UIE’s WAR ON TERRORISM against the USA’s Government Officials – i.e. Nazis and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
The UIE has also UPDATED the Counts (approximately 65) for the United States Department of Justice Criminal Complaint/International Criminal Court Communication being drafted and will be using the USA HOSTAGE Crisis of the Americans and the THREATS that have been leveled AGAINST the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters.
With Warmest Regards,
Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Utica International Embassy
(888) 700-5056
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
A request to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas to prosecute DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson for federal crime of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242 against our minor clients.
What the current President has done to Mateo, Katy, and hundreds of other young children, newborns, infants, and their mothers—intentionally depriving them of adequate medical care, food, and shelter to the point of causing serious physical and mental harm—is extraordinarily unconscionable and demands immediate redress through prosecution of the principal perpetrator, President Barack Obama.
Demand that USCIS Cease Deprivation of Rights of Detained FamiliesBryan Johnson
Given that your agency intentionally eliminated several important procedural safeguards designed to ensure that bona fide asylum seekers are not removed to countries where they may face persecution or torture, specifically in response to the increase in the number of families apprehended in the Fiscal Year of 2014, and given that your agency went even further by eliminating virtually every procedural safeguard in the CF and RF screening process exclusively for families, the initial negative CF determinations made against the families currently detained must be vacated, discarded, and de novo CF interviews must be conducted.
These are the medical records to back up our clients' claim that they were victims of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 USC 242 committed by President Barack Obama.
Created by the team at Twenty20.
Your customers are addicted to mobile and now, more time is now spent on mobile devices than on computers.
Consumers have made the shift from desktop to mobile but slow moving marketers haven't caught on. To win in mobile marketing it's essential to realize the power of mobile usage and craft campaigns for smartphone marketing. The recent KPCB Internet Trends 2015 report has some powerful data (included here) supporting the need for your attention to shift to marketing on mobile. The biggest key to success in mobile marketing is using engaging, authentic stock photos to connect with your mobile addicted customers.
9th Circuit Appeal Court Flores Decision. Bryan Johnson
The panel held that the Settlement unambiguously
applies both to minors who are accompanied and
unaccompanied by their parents.
The panel held, however, that the district court erred in interpreting the Settlement to provide release rights to accompanying adults. The panel also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the government’s motion to amend the Settlement.
7 Juvenile Justice Procedures
Chapter Learning Objectives
On completion of this chapter, students should be able to do the following:
Understand and discuss juvenile court procedures
Discuss the rights of juveniles at various stages, from taking into custody through appeals
Understand requirements for bail, notification, and filing of petitions
Discuss procedures involved in detaining juveniles
What Would You Do?
It is Friday night and you are in bed. Your 13-year-old daughter is spending the night with a friend. The two girls told you they were going to a movie and back to
her friend’s home. Her friend’s older sister, who is 18, is going to drive them to and from the movie. At approximately 2:15 a.m. you get a phone call. The caller
identifies herself as Lisa Strom, an employee of the Forten County Detention Center. She says that your daughter has been taken into custody for curfew violation,
possession of alcohol by a minor, peace disturbance, and assaulting a police officer. Ms. Strom informs you that your daughter will be held in detention pending a
review of her case by a juvenile intake officer. This review will take place within the next 24 hours and you will receive another phone call once the juvenile intake
officer decides to hold or release the child. She states that you are allowed to visit your daughter once within the next 24 hours and informs you that visitation is
allowed between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. that day. The only question you can think to ask is if your daughter is okay. Ms. Strom says your daughter is going through
the intake process and is in good health. You hang up the phone wide awake and wondering what to do next.
What Would You Do?
1. Would your daughter be classified as a status offender or a delinquent, according to the charges?
2. What would be your next course of action? Would you contact a lawyer, wait for the phone call from the juvenile intake officer, visit your daughter during
visiting hours, or do something else?
3. If you were the juvenile intake officer, would you continue to detain this child or release her to her parents pending court?
Juvenile court acts discuss not only the purposes and scope of the juvenile justice system but also the procedure the juvenile courts are to
follow. Proceedings concerning juveniles officially begin with the filing of a petition alleging that a juvenile is delinquent, dependent,
neglected, abused, in need of supervision, or in need of authoritative intervention. Most juvenile court acts, however, also discuss the unofficial
or diversionary activities available as remedies prior to the filing of a petition such as a stationhouse adjustment and a preliminary
conference. A stationhouse adjustment occurs when a police officer negotiates a settlement with a juvenile, often with his or her parents,
without taking further official action (a full discussion of stationhouse adjustments follows in Chapter 8). A preliminary conference is a
voluntary meeting arranged by .
On Tuesday, February 21st, 2017 two (2) guidance memos were singed by Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly implementing the President’s Executive Orders on immigration enforcement. Although much attention has been focused on the building of the border wall, these new memos direct the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to escalate harsh immigration enforcement nationwide. The memos reveal that DHS intends to take a much more “enforcement-oriented” position with regard to U.S. Immigration law.
Civil Detentions and the Penological Justifications for Punishment - Why The...Lawrence Cisneros
The U.S. government affords undocumented immigrants with less regard than non-citizen terrorists captured in battlefields across the world. Enemy combatants are appointed counsel after being detained by U.S. armed forces abroad for terrorist activities. Undocumented immigrants in the United States, toiling often in sweat-shop like conditions, and all the while paying taxes, are not appointed a lawyer if placed in deportation proceedings, nor receive assistance from legal aid organizations.
This detention and rapid deportation policy is fundamentally inhumane, undermines refugees' access to legal counsel and fair
process, and is in violation of federal Court Orders issued in the
already resulted in the wrongful deportation of children and families back into the very violence from Flores class action case. It has which they fled and must end once and for all."
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
1. AMOACHI & JOHNSO ,PLLC
ATTO RNEYS AT LAV/
By First-Class Mail and E-mail
The Honorable John F. Kelly
Secretary of Homeland Security
3801 Nebraska Ave, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20528
Dear Secretary Kelly:
February 27, 2017
As attorneys who represent hundreds of unaccompanied children and asylum seekers
from Central America, we write this letter to respectfully demand that you rescind the Section M,
"Accountability Measures to Protect Alien Children from Exploitation and Prevent Abuses
of Our Immigration Laws" of the February 20, 2017 memorandum entitled "Implementing the
Presidnet's Enforcement Improvement Policies" given that it is in direct violation of the Flores v.
Meese Settlement ("Flores") and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection
Reauthorization Act (PUBLIC LAW 110--457-DEC. 23, 2008) ("TVPRA")
Flores and the TVPRA require the U.S. government to provide significant procedural and
substantive rights to immigrant children, as you acknowledge. 1
Flores specifically mandates the
federal agencies "shall release a minor from its custody without unnecessary delay, in the
following order of preference to:
A. a parent;
B. a legal guardian;
C. an adult relative (brother, sister, aunt, uncle, or grandparent);
D. an adult individual or entity designated by the parent or legal
guardian as capable and willing to care for the minor's well-being
in (i) a declaration signed under penalty of perjury before an
immigration or consular officer or (ii) such other document(s) that
establish( es) to the satisfaction of the INS, in its discretion, the
affiant's paternity or guardianship;
E. a licensed program willing to accept legal custody; or
1
Implementing President's Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies, February 20, 2017
"The determination that the child is an ' unaccompanied alien child' entitles the child to special protections , including placement in a
suitable care facility , access to social services, remov al proceedings before an immigration judge under section 240 of the INA, rather
than expedited removal proceedings under sectio n 235(b) of the lNA , and initial adjudication of any asylum claim by USCIS. "
1
1918 Un ion Boulevard , Bay Shor e NY 11706 • T: (631) 647-9701 Fax: (631) 647-9705 • www.an~olaw.com
2. F. an adult individual or entity seeking custody, in the discretion of
the INS, when it appears that there is no other likely alternative to
long term detention and family
reunification does not appear to be a reasonable possibility."
As a condition of release, the proposed custodian must swear to several duties, including
to 1. provide for the minor 's physical , mental, and financial well-being and 2. to ensure the
minor's presence at all future proceedings before INS and the immigration court.
The TVPRA, created in 2008, created additional protections for unaccompanied alien
children, including the following directive to the Office of Refugee Resettlement:
"(2) SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS .-Subject to section 462(b)(2) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(b)(2)) , an unaccompanied alien child in the custody of the
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall be promptly placed in the least restrictive setting
that is in the best interest of the child. In making such placements, the Secretary may
consider danger to self, danger to community, and risk of flight."
The TVPRA also expanded the number of children eligible for special immigrant juvenile
status, a form of permanent protection from deportation. Specifically, a child can qualify for SIJS
status if they can show that reunification with 1 or both of their parent s is not viable due to
abuse, abandonment, neglect, or a similar basis found under State law, and that it is not in their
best interests to return to their native country.2
Section M's Directive To Prosecute Parents For Smuggling Their Own Children Eliminates
Flores and the TVPRA Protections
Immediately after outlining the requirements that DBS must comply with regarding
unaccompanied children, you began Section M with "Although the Department's personnel must
process unaccompanied alien children pursuant to the requirements above, we have an obligation
to ensure that those who conspire to violate our immigration laws do not do so with impunity-
particularly in light of the unique vulnerabilities of alien children who are smuggled or trafficked
into the United States."
2
(d) PERMANENT PROTECTION FOR CERTAIN AT-RISK CHILDREN.-
(!) IN GENERAL-Section 101(a)(27)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. l 10l(a)(27)(J)) is
amended- (A) in clause (i), by striking " State and who has been deemed eligible by that court for long-term foster
care due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment ;" and inserting "State, or an individual or entity appointed by a State or
juvenile court located in the United States, and whose reunification with 1 or both of the immigrant's parents is not
viable due to abuse, neglect, abandonment , or a
similar basis found under State law;'
2
3. The word "Although" is a conjunction, which is defined as "a word used to connect
clauses or sentences or to coordinate words in the same clause."3
The word "although" is defined
as "In spite of the fact that; even though." We do not define these words for the sake of being
difficult-we do so because it illustrates how DHS' directive to prosecute the parents of children
for smuggling is intended to eliminate children 's rights under TVPRA and Flores rather than the
purported justification of faithful enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.
You made an explicit choice to condition the provision of unaccompanied children's
legal rights the DHS' subsequent deportation and/or prosecution of the children's parents or
relatives. The latter will result in the defacto deprivation of rights of children through the loss of
their parent or family member in in the United States.
The entirety of Section M reveals a clear pattern of DHS' intent to enforce the
immigration laws and criminal laws against children's family members solely as a means to
defeat the legal protections afforded to unaccompanied children .
There are a total of 3 paragraphs in Section M. In the first paragraph , reproduced above in
full, the first sentence refers exclusively to the policy rationale of enforcing the immigration law
against those who violate it. The second sentence, which added as an afterthought, purports to
conclude that stopping parents' from reunification with their children in the United States will
protect the "unique vulnerabilities of alien children who are smuggled or trafficked into the
United States.
The second paragraph is structurally identical. The first sentence begins:
"The parents and family members of these children, who are often illegally present in the
United States, often pay smugglers several thousand dollars to bring their children into this
country."
The latter focuses exclusively on 1. The "illegal" presence of the children's parents in the
united States; and 2. That the illegally present parents pay smugglers to bring their children into
the United States.
The second sentence described the journey through Mexico as dangerous, though it cites
to no evidence whatsoever.
"Tragically, many of these children fall victim to robbery ,
extortion, kidnapping, sexual assault, and other crimes of violence
by the smugglers and other criminal elements along the dangerous
journey through Mexico."
The third sentence clarifies that this policy has nothing to do with protecting children
from harm and everything to do with nullifying or eliminating the protections afforded children
under the TVPRA and Flores to the maximum effect:
3
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com /definition/conjunction
. 3
4. "Regardless of the desires for family reunification , or conditions in
other countries, the smuggling or trafficking of alien children is
intolerable."
In other words, regardless if a child smuggled into the United States is entitled to asylum
and/or special immigrant juvenile protection in the United States, DHS' policy is deny them
these legal protections by prosecuting and/or deporting their parent or family member for an act
made out the extreme desperation of a parents' love for their child.
The last paragraph of Section M is as follows:
"... the Director of ICE and the Commissioner of CBP shall ensure the proper
enforcement of our immigration laws against any individual who-directly or indirectly-
facilitates the illegal smuggling or trafficking of an alien child into the United States. In
appropriate cases, taking into account the risk of harm to the child from the specific smuggling
or trafficking activity that the individual facilitated and otherfactors relevant to the individual 's
culpability and the child's welfare, proper enforcement includes (but is not limited to) placing
any such individual who is a removable alien into removal proceedings, or referring the
individual for criminal prosecution. "
The above paragraph is identical to the draft memorandum dated February 17 with the
exception of the italicized words. As such, it appears that you acknowledge prosecuting or
removing a parent of an unaccompanied child is not in the best interests of the child's overall
welfare. The harm suffered by the child or the parent's culpability in providing for the smuggling
is a separate inquiry from what is in the child's future best interests. The only scenario where
prosecution of a parent or relative of a parent can be reconciled with the child's welfare is if in
fact that person brought the child to the United States to be trafficked. Although this can happen ,
it is exceedingly rare with respect to parents of the child.
Given your expertise on the subject4
we were shocked that you entirely discarded the
conditions of the children's native countries of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala when you
signed off on Section M.
In written testimony before Congress in March of 2015, you wrote that Transnational
Criminal Organizations "tear at the social, economic, and security fabric of our Central
American neighbors" and engage in "money laundering , bribery, intimidation, and
assassination." You concluded that "They threaten the very underpinnings of democracy itself:
citizen safety, rule oflaw, and economic prosperity. And they pose a direct threat to the stability
of our partners and an insidious risk to the security of our nation."
Moreover, you emphasized that the primary motivation for unaccompanied children was
grounded in the dire insecurity of their native countries , measures to deter the exodus of
unaccompanied children to the United States are unlikely to have success:
4
http://www.armed-services.sen ate.gov /imo/media/doc/Kelly_03-12-15 .pdf
4
5. "Last year, almost half a million migrants from Central America and Mexico-includsing
over 50,000 unaccompanied children (UAC) and families-were apprehended on our border,
many fleeing violence, poverty , and the spreading influence of criminal networks and gangs.
Assistant Secretary of State Roberta Jacobson testified that the 'UAC migration serves as a
warning sign that the serious and longstanding challenges in Central America are worsening. '5
For FY 2016, UAC apprehensions totaled nearly 60,000, almost matching the record of
68,541 in FY 2014. Moreover, UAC apprehensions from El Salvador and Guatemala exceeded
that of FY 2014.6
Yet now, as DHS Secretary, you state that the United States must criminalize the parent's
desperate act of love- smuggling-to save their own child from being killed or harmed by these
very same organizations that you previously declared "are tearing at the social , economic and
security fabric of our Central American neighbors."
The Practical Consequences of Section M Will Be To Deny Children Their Rights Under
Flores and the TVPRA
In order to initiate removal proceedings or prosecute parents who allegedly smuggled
their own child into the United States, DHS must use information ORR obtained from the child·
and proposed sponsor during the reunification process. ORR must elicit this information,
including the name, identity , and address of the parent , to ensure the safety of the child, (i.e. that
the parent claiming to be the parent is in fact the parent and not an imposter seeking to traffick
the child) reunified with their parent
In other words , But for the child vindicating their rights to release from custody and to
reunification with their parent or closest relative, ICE would be unable to initiate removal or
criminal proceedings against that parent. The DHS' official policy is to use laws created to
ensure the best interests of immigrant children as a vehicle to work directly against the best
interests of immigrant children.
If DHS initiates removal proceedings or files criminal charges against an unaccompanied
minor's parent, that parent will likely be detained and could face deportation to their native
country. Detaining and deporting a child's parent or parents is, in vast majority of circumstances,
decidedly not in that child's best interests.
If a parent is detained, that parent cannot provide for the care and custody of their child;
cannot ensure that the child appears for their court hearing; and cannot obtain an attorney for that
child to apply for and obtain asylum or special immigrant status that the child is likely entitled to.
5
Posture Statement of General John F. Kelly, United States Marine Corps, Commander , United States Southern
Command, Before The 114th
Congress , Armed Service Committee, March 12, 2015, http://www.armed-
services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Kelly 03-12-15.pdf
6
https ://www.cbp.govInewsroom /stats/southwest-border-unaccompanied-ch iidren/fy-2016
5
6. In many cases, detaining, deporting or prosecuting an unaccompanied child's parent(s)
will result in the defacto deportation of the child, even if that child was granted asylum or SIJS
status. Asylum protection in the United States is not worth the paper its written on if the child
simultaneously loses the only adults capable of caring for them in the United States.
Although this list is not exhaustive, one particularly ironic consequence of this policy will
be to increase the risk that children are trafficked, or abused and neglected by other individuals
who are not suited to care for the child. Human traffickers target the most vulnerable of children.
A child whose parent is ripped from their lives is not only more vulnerable, but significantly
more visible as a target. One day, their was a parent to protect them.
We again respectfully demand that you rescind Section M of the implementation memo
given that its clear intent to eliminate unaccompanied alien children's rights under the TVPRA
and Flores.
The Ultra-Aggressive Policy of Expending Significant Law Enforcement Resources on
Removing and Criminalizing Non-Criminal Parents Of Unaccompanied Alien Children
For Saving Their Children's Lives Undermines United States Security
In your testimony in March of 2015, you strongly urged Congress members to address
the "root causes of insecurity and instability" because it was in the United States' interests.
Specifically, you cited to the "relative ease with which human smugglers moved tens of
thousands of people to our nation's doorstep and that "these smuggling routes are a potential
vulnerability to our homeland. In explaining your basis, you went on to state that "In addition to
the thousands of Central Americans :fleeingpoverty and violence, foreign nationals from
countries like Somalia, Bangladesh, Lebanon, and Pakistan are using the region 's human
smuggling networks to enter the United States" and that "a small subset could potentially be
seeking to do us harm.
You concluded that "Last year, ISIS adherents posted discussions on social media calling
for the infiltration of the U.S. southern border" though there has not yet been any evidence of
this happening. You again stated "I am deeply concerned that smuggling networks are a
vulnerability that terrorists could seek to exploit."
As you know, the instability and insecurity in Central America is not what has caused
human smuggling networks toflourish. These networks have their genesis in one factor: the
United States and Mexico's policy requiring individuals from the countries of Honduras, El
Salvador, and Guatemala to obtain a visa prior to entering or passing through Mexico. But for
this joint immigration policy7, human smuggling networks would barely exist: a child or adult
who wished to seek asylum in the United States could simply fly directly from San Salvador to
the Mexican/US border and promptly express their request to seek asylum as an arriving alien at
a US port of entry.
7
Prior to the elimination of the wet foot, dry foot policy, Cubans were able to secure safe passage through Central
America and Mexico, all without the need for human smugglers. http://www .bbc.eo.uk/news/world -latin-america-
3519 1828
6
7. As this map illustrates, the Northern Triangle countries are the only countries in Central
America, and one of the few countries in all of Latin America that require a visa to enter
Mexico.8
U!.iELECTRONICAUTHORIZATION
It is not a stretch to conclude that the United States' is largely responsible for Mexico's
visa requirements for Central Americans. (See former President Obama 's comments on Central
American migration crisis: "If it were not for the hard work of Mexico in trying to secure its
border to the south and to cooperate with us, we would have a much more significant problem.
nd if it were not for the hard work of Mexico in trying to secure its border to the south and to
cooperate with us, we would have a much more significant problem." 9
)
Without visa requirements to enter Mexico, there would be no significant obstacles to
Central Americans from seeking asylum or other protections in the United States at the
U.S./Mexico border.
Under the current laws and policies, Central Americans, including UAC, pay smug;slers
from $5,000-plus to bribe Mexican law enforcement to ignore their unlawful presence in Mexico
as well as to provide protection from the various drug and human trafficking organizations that
prey on migrants throughout the trip from Mexico to the United States. The underground nature
of human smuggling comes with inherent risks, including that the smuggler abuses, rapes, or
murders the person(s) they were paid to transport.
However, the alternative to a paying a smuggler is far more dangerous : a child or any
individual who attempts to travel through Mexico to the United States on their own is at the
8
http://www.inm.gob.mx/gobmx/word/index .pho/paises-reguieren-visa-para -mexico/
9
http://time .com/4419849/president -obama-donald-trump-speech/
7
8. complete mercy of corrupt Mexican officials and transnational or national criminal
organizations.
Providing safe passage of unaccompanied children and asylum seekers from Central
America through Mexico would enhance the U.S. security by enabling the prioritization of
resources on interdicting and apprehending individuals , such as potential terrorists, who pose an
actual risk to the safety of the United States.
Conclusion
Given that Section M unlawfully eliminates the legal protections of unaccompanied
children through deporting and/or prosecuting children's parents or legal guardians in the United
States and that the policy will do nothing to address the root causes of human smuggling, we
again respectfully demand that you rescind Section Min its entirety.
We thank you for your attention to this urgent matter and look forward to a prompt
response . If you should have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at
631-647-9701 , or via e-mail at Bryan@amjolaw.com or Ala@amiolaw.com
Very Truly Yours,
8