A request to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas to prosecute DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson for federal crime of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242 against our minor clients.
What the current President has done to Mateo, Katy, and hundreds of other young children, newborns, infants, and their mothers—intentionally depriving them of adequate medical care, food, and shelter to the point of causing serious physical and mental harm—is extraordinarily unconscionable and demands immediate redress through prosecution of the principal perpetrator, President Barack Obama.
These are the medical records to back up our clients' claim that they were victims of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 USC 242 committed by President Barack Obama.
Demand that USCIS Cease Deprivation of Rights of Detained FamiliesBryan Johnson
The document discusses the benefits of meditation for reducing stress and anxiety. Regular meditation practice can help calm the mind and body by lowering heart rate and blood pressure. Making meditation a part of a daily routine, even if just 10-15 minutes per day, can offer improvements to mood, focus, and overall well-being over time.
As attorneys who represent hundreds of unaccompanied children and asylum seekers from Central America, we write this letter to respectfully demand that you rescind the Section M, “Accountability Measures to Protect Alien Children from Exploitation and Prevent Abuses of Our Immigration Laws” of the February 20, 2017 memorandum entitled “Implementing the Presidnet’s Enforcement Improvement Policies” given that it is in direct violation of the Flores v. Meese Settlement (“Flores”) and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (PUBLIC LAW 110–457—DEC. 23, 2008) (“TVPRA”)
This email chain discusses a complaint received about an Immigration Judge and the follow up actions taken. The Assistant Chief Immigration Judge provided the judge with two Board of Immigration Appeals decisions that were critical of the judge. They discussed the criticisms on two occasions and the judge acknowledged some of his prior comments were wrong. The ACIJ also addressed a separate complaint from an attorney with the judge. They discussed being careful and granting continuances to avoid further complaints. The ACIJ and judge also reviewed the judge's annual performance evaluation.
EOIR complaints, Unredacted March 2015 Releaseamjolaw
- Elisa Sukkar met with IJ Chapa twice in January 2010 to discuss two BIA decisions that criticized some of his comments as "brusque" and "unwarranted". They reviewed the decisions and transcripts together and Chapa acknowledged some of his comments were wrong.
- As part of the review, Sukkar also addressed a complaint emailed by an attorney about Chapa. Sukkar provided the process for filing a formal complaint but none was received. Chapa was advised to be more careful to avoid recusal requests.
- Sukkar followed the same format with all IJs during their performance and workload reviews, addressing any BIA criticisms or complaints in addition to reviewing their
What the current President has done to Mateo, Katy, and hundreds of other young children, newborns, infants, and their mothers—intentionally depriving them of adequate medical care, food, and shelter to the point of causing serious physical and mental harm—is extraordinarily unconscionable and demands immediate redress through prosecution of the principal perpetrator, President Barack Obama.
These are the medical records to back up our clients' claim that they were victims of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 USC 242 committed by President Barack Obama.
Demand that USCIS Cease Deprivation of Rights of Detained FamiliesBryan Johnson
The document discusses the benefits of meditation for reducing stress and anxiety. Regular meditation practice can help calm the mind and body by lowering heart rate and blood pressure. Making meditation a part of a daily routine, even if just 10-15 minutes per day, can offer improvements to mood, focus, and overall well-being over time.
As attorneys who represent hundreds of unaccompanied children and asylum seekers from Central America, we write this letter to respectfully demand that you rescind the Section M, “Accountability Measures to Protect Alien Children from Exploitation and Prevent Abuses of Our Immigration Laws” of the February 20, 2017 memorandum entitled “Implementing the Presidnet’s Enforcement Improvement Policies” given that it is in direct violation of the Flores v. Meese Settlement (“Flores”) and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (PUBLIC LAW 110–457—DEC. 23, 2008) (“TVPRA”)
This email chain discusses a complaint received about an Immigration Judge and the follow up actions taken. The Assistant Chief Immigration Judge provided the judge with two Board of Immigration Appeals decisions that were critical of the judge. They discussed the criticisms on two occasions and the judge acknowledged some of his prior comments were wrong. The ACIJ also addressed a separate complaint from an attorney with the judge. They discussed being careful and granting continuances to avoid further complaints. The ACIJ and judge also reviewed the judge's annual performance evaluation.
EOIR complaints, Unredacted March 2015 Releaseamjolaw
- Elisa Sukkar met with IJ Chapa twice in January 2010 to discuss two BIA decisions that criticized some of his comments as "brusque" and "unwarranted". They reviewed the decisions and transcripts together and Chapa acknowledged some of his comments were wrong.
- As part of the review, Sukkar also addressed a complaint emailed by an attorney about Chapa. Sukkar provided the process for filing a formal complaint but none was received. Chapa was advised to be more careful to avoid recusal requests.
- Sukkar followed the same format with all IJs during their performance and workload reviews, addressing any BIA criticisms or complaints in addition to reviewing their
EOIR complaints UNredacted, December 2014 Release amjolaw
EOIR FOIA Processing (EOIR)
From: Burr,Sarah(EOIR)
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:30 PM
To: Keller,Mary Beth (EOIR)
Subject: RE:Hom complaint 349
Sarah Burr agrees that a complaint against Judge Hom should be closed as the conduct was addressed by subsequent training. Mary Beth Keller suggested closing the complaint since the conduct pre-dated retraining in November 2007 and was part of ongoing counseling.
- Judge Cordova underwent remedial training conducted by Judge Weil that incorporated 15 remanded cases and other teaching aids, but Judge Cordova failed to take notes or adequately assimilate the information.
- During an observed hearing, Judge Cordova made multiple legal errors in stating the burden of proof standards and failed to properly order removal when granting voluntary departure.
- The email expresses concern that Judge Cordova's lack of basic skills is jeopardizing the cases he is handling and that his deficiencies are more significant than previously realized.
The document summarizes a counseling session between Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Gary Smith and Judge Jesus Clemente of the York Immigration Court regarding two issues. Smith discussed comments Judge Clemente made in an oral decision that could be perceived as stereotyping and advised him to choose his words carefully. Smith also advised Judge Clemente to issue oral decisions rather than just minute orders for cases involving aggravated felonies. Judge Clemente agreed to be more cautious with his comments and to start issuing full oral decisions.
This document discusses two complaints that were made against Judge Mills. Regarding the first complaint, Gary Smith reviewed the case transcripts and documents and determined that while the appellate court found issue with Judge Mill's questioning style, she gave both sides a full opportunity to present their case. Regarding the second complaint involving three separate issues, Gary Smith determined that the Board of Immigration Appeals had already ruled on the first two issues, and the third case was rescheduled and completed, resolving all aspects of the second complaint. Gary believes both complaints have been adequately addressed.
The document summarizes the status of complaints pending against Immigration Judges. There are currently two pending complaints: Complaint No. 709 against IJ Houser, where the judge is waiting to rule on a motion to reopen, and Complaint No. 694 against IJ Pelletier, where the judge is waiting to fully respond. Two other complaints that were previously pending, Nos. 712 and 666, have been closed - No. 712 based on oral counseling of IJ Ford, and No. 666 which was found to be unsubstantiated against IJ Wilson. The complaint referred by Sabina on December 14, 2012 against IJ Arrington involving a respondent from Jamaica was also addressed with the judge and found
Jack Weil proposes handling a complaint against Immigration Judge DeVitto by issuing a letter finding that the original dismissal of the complaint was proper, despite intervening events in the related case. Michael McGoings has the complaint file and is ready to proceed but requested time to review the matter. Weil asks Mary Beth Keller to call if she wishes to discuss or has any questions.
The Assistant Chief Immigration Judge (ACIJ) issued a formal counseling memo to Immigration Judge John Carte regarding complaints about his conduct in presiding over three cases. In two of the cases, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the matters for a hearing before a different judge due to the IJ's intemperate and impatient comments. In the third case, the BIA also remanded due to unprofessional remarks by the IJ. While the ACIJ decided not to take formal disciplinary action, the memo served as a formal counseling and the ACIJ would consider these cases when evaluating the IJ's performance going forward.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
EOIR complaints UNredacted, December 2014 Release amjolaw
EOIR FOIA Processing (EOIR)
From: Burr,Sarah(EOIR)
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:30 PM
To: Keller,Mary Beth (EOIR)
Subject: RE:Hom complaint 349
Sarah Burr agrees that a complaint against Judge Hom should be closed as the conduct was addressed by subsequent training. Mary Beth Keller suggested closing the complaint since the conduct pre-dated retraining in November 2007 and was part of ongoing counseling.
- Judge Cordova underwent remedial training conducted by Judge Weil that incorporated 15 remanded cases and other teaching aids, but Judge Cordova failed to take notes or adequately assimilate the information.
- During an observed hearing, Judge Cordova made multiple legal errors in stating the burden of proof standards and failed to properly order removal when granting voluntary departure.
- The email expresses concern that Judge Cordova's lack of basic skills is jeopardizing the cases he is handling and that his deficiencies are more significant than previously realized.
The document summarizes a counseling session between Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Gary Smith and Judge Jesus Clemente of the York Immigration Court regarding two issues. Smith discussed comments Judge Clemente made in an oral decision that could be perceived as stereotyping and advised him to choose his words carefully. Smith also advised Judge Clemente to issue oral decisions rather than just minute orders for cases involving aggravated felonies. Judge Clemente agreed to be more cautious with his comments and to start issuing full oral decisions.
This document discusses two complaints that were made against Judge Mills. Regarding the first complaint, Gary Smith reviewed the case transcripts and documents and determined that while the appellate court found issue with Judge Mill's questioning style, she gave both sides a full opportunity to present their case. Regarding the second complaint involving three separate issues, Gary Smith determined that the Board of Immigration Appeals had already ruled on the first two issues, and the third case was rescheduled and completed, resolving all aspects of the second complaint. Gary believes both complaints have been adequately addressed.
The document summarizes the status of complaints pending against Immigration Judges. There are currently two pending complaints: Complaint No. 709 against IJ Houser, where the judge is waiting to rule on a motion to reopen, and Complaint No. 694 against IJ Pelletier, where the judge is waiting to fully respond. Two other complaints that were previously pending, Nos. 712 and 666, have been closed - No. 712 based on oral counseling of IJ Ford, and No. 666 which was found to be unsubstantiated against IJ Wilson. The complaint referred by Sabina on December 14, 2012 against IJ Arrington involving a respondent from Jamaica was also addressed with the judge and found
Jack Weil proposes handling a complaint against Immigration Judge DeVitto by issuing a letter finding that the original dismissal of the complaint was proper, despite intervening events in the related case. Michael McGoings has the complaint file and is ready to proceed but requested time to review the matter. Weil asks Mary Beth Keller to call if she wishes to discuss or has any questions.
The Assistant Chief Immigration Judge (ACIJ) issued a formal counseling memo to Immigration Judge John Carte regarding complaints about his conduct in presiding over three cases. In two of the cases, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the matters for a hearing before a different judge due to the IJ's intemperate and impatient comments. In the third case, the BIA also remanded due to unprofessional remarks by the IJ. While the ACIJ decided not to take formal disciplinary action, the memo served as a formal counseling and the ACIJ would consider these cases when evaluating the IJ's performance going forward.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.