SlideShare a Scribd company logo
How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? A Chapman Alliance, Research Study September 2010 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com Abstract:Several years ago, I published some learning development metrics from several different studies that included ratios for how long it takes to create different types of learning. The information has been widely used and appears frequently throughout the Blogosphere. Recently, we have been receiving many requests to update this data, so Chapman Alliance created a survey to collect usable metrics that will help you benchmark your own learning development times. This time, all of the results were collected from a single audience (249 completed surveys) across several learning formats including instructor –led training (ILT), Level 1 e-Learning (Basic), Level 2 e-learning (Interactive), Level 3 e-learning (Advanced), and information about blended learning. The results are contained in this deck. Now, the good news… You are welcome to share this research with anyone you’d like. Because we feel that this information is so important to the industry, we have released it under Creative Commons, meaning that you can share the whole deck or pull-out slides/charts and add them to your presentations, white papers, conference presentations, etc.  The only restrictions are (1) you must ALWAYS list the source of information as “Chapman Alliance” and (2) you are NOT allowed to sell the results without written permission from Chapman Alliance. That’s it. Enjoy! Source Citation:  Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com
Survey DemographicsThanks to all of you who took time to complete the survey!If you would like to participate in future research surveys from Chapman Alliance, please join our list at www.chapmanalliance.com/join-our-mailing-list
The data contained in this research was collected from 249 organizations, representing 3,947 learning development professionals, who have created learning content  (ILT and eLearning) that is consumed by 19,875,946 Learners.
Instructor-Led Training (ILT)Development Benchmark
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges 82:1 43:1 22:1
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of  hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 43 hours Based on average of 43 development hours, per finished hour of ILT
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create instructor-led training (internally)? $5,934 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of ILT. The cost shown is the average
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of ILT: 43 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of ILT content: $5,934 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 1 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 1 - eLearning How is Level 1 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 1 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 125:1 79:1 49:1
Development of Level 1 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 79 hours Based on average of 79 development hours, per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning
Development of Level 1 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 1 eLearning? $10,054 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 1 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: 79 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: $10,054 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 2 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 2 - eLearning How is Level 2 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 2 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 267:1 184:1 127:1
Development of Level 2 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 184 hours Based on average of 184 development hours, per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning
$18,583 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 2 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: 184 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: $18,583 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 3 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 3 - eLearning How is Level 3 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 3 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges NOTE: Several respondents listed times greater than 2000+ hours of development per finished hour (very advanced learning simulations and games) 716:1 490:1 217:1
Development of Level 3 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 490 hours Based on average of 490 development hours, per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning
Development of Level 3 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 3 eLearning? $50,371 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 3 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: 490 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: $50,371 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Comparison ChartsDevelopment Ratios and Costs
Development Ratios - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
Average Cost Comparisons - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
Blended LearningBenchmark of Blended Learning Components
Blended Learning Components Radar chart showing components most frequently used as part of a blended learning course (across all respondents)
Blended Learning Components Components used most frequently as part of a blend
Blended Learning Components Average mix of major components: Classroom, Virtual Classroom and E-Learning (survey respondents)
Blended Learning What is the average size of a Blended Learning Course?  …and what are organizations typically paying for internal development of blended learning (on average)? NOTE: These were asked as three separate questions.  Components used in blend Typical length of blend Average cost of blend We realize that this data doesn’t mesh well with previous questions about development per finished hour ratios.  If you average out the costs, it would seem to suggest that blended learning is created at a rate of $809 per finished hour ($25,900 divided by 32).  We thought it would be helpful to share the data anyway.  Please understand these constraints when interpreting the data $25,900 Average Duration  32 hours Average Configuration
About the Author Bryan Chapman is Chief Learning Strategist at Chapman Alliance; a provider of research-centric consulting solutions that assist organizations in defining, operating and optimizing their strategic learning initiatives. As a veteran in the industry, he has over 20 years experience and has worked with such organizations as American Express, Shell, Kodak, Sprint, Sharp Electronics, Honda, IBM, Microsoft, Avon, UNICEF, American Red Cross, The Food and Drug Administration, U.S. State Department, and many others; to help them optimize learning efficiency through the use of innovative learning techniques and technologies. Click here for a full bio. Please feel free to contact me if you need some assistance… ,[object Object]
finding and applying learning industry research; custom research projects

More Related Content

Similar to Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación

Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Chapman Alliance
 
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docxFormative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
hanneloremccaffery
 
Design & development hours
Design & development hoursDesign & development hours
Design & development hoursSouhair Katbeh
 
Internship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalInternship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalS. Rose
 
Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Ed Nagelhout
 
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearningSingle-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Xyleme
 
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Human Capital Media
 
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course DevelopmentLet’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
CommLab India – Rapid eLearning Solutions
 
CO and PO presentation.pptx
CO and PO presentation.pptxCO and PO presentation.pptx
CO and PO presentation.pptx
IsrarEqubal2
 
Ippd for teachers
Ippd for teachersIppd for teachers
Ippd for teachersbenchhood
 
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
Mary Claire Entea
 
Sacred heart 2017 share
Sacred heart 2017 shareSacred heart 2017 share
Sacred heart 2017 share
EdAdvance
 
Basics of E-learning
Basics of E-learningBasics of E-learning
Technology Action Plan
Technology Action PlanTechnology Action Plan
Technology Action Planclynvan1
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional Design
Riva Warid
 
Best practices in blended professional learning
Best practices in blended professional learningBest practices in blended professional learning
Best practices in blended professional learning
Andrew Miller
 
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014) 6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
SVTaylor123
 
Cobb Technology Action Plan
Cobb Technology Action PlanCobb Technology Action Plan
Cobb Technology Action Plancobbyt62
 
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation ReportSmart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
Christine Gonnella
 

Similar to Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación (20)

Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
 
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docxFormative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
 
Design & development hours
Design & development hoursDesign & development hours
Design & development hours
 
Internship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalInternship Project Proposal
Internship Project Proposal
 
Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)
 
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearningSingle-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
 
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
 
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course DevelopmentLet’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
Let’s Estimate the Cost of eLearning Course Development
 
CO and PO presentation.pptx
CO and PO presentation.pptxCO and PO presentation.pptx
CO and PO presentation.pptx
 
Ippd for teachers
Ippd for teachersIppd for teachers
Ippd for teachers
 
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
Ippdforteachers 130529001430-phpapp01
 
Sacred heart 2017 share
Sacred heart 2017 shareSacred heart 2017 share
Sacred heart 2017 share
 
Basics of E-learning
Basics of E-learningBasics of E-learning
Basics of E-learning
 
Technology Action Plan
Technology Action PlanTechnology Action Plan
Technology Action Plan
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional Design
 
Best practices in blended professional learning
Best practices in blended professional learningBest practices in blended professional learning
Best practices in blended professional learning
 
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014) 6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
6910 6911 seminar 4 (fall 2014)
 
M1-Designing-SLOs-13NOV13
M1-Designing-SLOs-13NOV13M1-Designing-SLOs-13NOV13
M1-Designing-SLOs-13NOV13
 
Cobb Technology Action Plan
Cobb Technology Action PlanCobb Technology Action Plan
Cobb Technology Action Plan
 
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation ReportSmart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
Smart Classroom instruction Formative Evaluation Report
 

More from Epise

Resumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
Resumen Ejecutivo Soir AstdResumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
Resumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
Epise
 
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
Epise
 
Soluciones Presenciales
Soluciones PresencialesSoluciones Presenciales
Soluciones PresencialesEpise
 
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelosProyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
Epise
 
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
Epise
 
Astd 2010 From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
Astd 2010   From Reading Books To Sharing ExperienceAstd 2010   From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
Astd 2010 From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
Epise
 

More from Epise (6)

Resumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
Resumen Ejecutivo Soir AstdResumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
Resumen Ejecutivo Soir Astd
 
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
Presentacion Corporativa Junio2011
 
Soluciones Presenciales
Soluciones PresencialesSoluciones Presenciales
Soluciones Presenciales
 
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelosProyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
Proyecto Experimental: aprendizaje por modelos
 
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
Presentacion Epise-juny 2010
 
Astd 2010 From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
Astd 2010   From Reading Books To Sharing ExperienceAstd 2010   From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
Astd 2010 From Reading Books To Sharing Experience
 

Recently uploaded

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Vikramjit Singh
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Jisc
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Ashokrao Mane college of Pharmacy Peth-Vadgaon
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Celine George
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 

Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación

  • 1. How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? A Chapman Alliance, Research Study September 2010 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com Abstract:Several years ago, I published some learning development metrics from several different studies that included ratios for how long it takes to create different types of learning. The information has been widely used and appears frequently throughout the Blogosphere. Recently, we have been receiving many requests to update this data, so Chapman Alliance created a survey to collect usable metrics that will help you benchmark your own learning development times. This time, all of the results were collected from a single audience (249 completed surveys) across several learning formats including instructor –led training (ILT), Level 1 e-Learning (Basic), Level 2 e-learning (Interactive), Level 3 e-learning (Advanced), and information about blended learning. The results are contained in this deck. Now, the good news… You are welcome to share this research with anyone you’d like. Because we feel that this information is so important to the industry, we have released it under Creative Commons, meaning that you can share the whole deck or pull-out slides/charts and add them to your presentations, white papers, conference presentations, etc. The only restrictions are (1) you must ALWAYS list the source of information as “Chapman Alliance” and (2) you are NOT allowed to sell the results without written permission from Chapman Alliance. That’s it. Enjoy! Source Citation: Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com
  • 2. Survey DemographicsThanks to all of you who took time to complete the survey!If you would like to participate in future research surveys from Chapman Alliance, please join our list at www.chapmanalliance.com/join-our-mailing-list
  • 3. The data contained in this research was collected from 249 organizations, representing 3,947 learning development professionals, who have created learning content (ILT and eLearning) that is consumed by 19,875,946 Learners.
  • 5. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges 82:1 43:1 22:1
  • 6. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 43 hours Based on average of 43 development hours, per finished hour of ILT
  • 7. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create instructor-led training (internally)? $5,934 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of ILT. The cost shown is the average
  • 8. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of ILT: 43 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of ILT content: $5,934 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 9. Level 1 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 10. Development of Level 1 - eLearning How is Level 1 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 11. Development of Level 1 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 125:1 79:1 49:1
  • 12. Development of Level 1 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 79 hours Based on average of 79 development hours, per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning
  • 13. Development of Level 1 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 1 eLearning? $10,054 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 14. Development of Level 1 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: 79 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: $10,054 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 15. Level 2 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 16. Development of Level 2 - eLearning How is Level 2 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 17. Development of Level 2 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 267:1 184:1 127:1
  • 18. Development of Level 2 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 184 hours Based on average of 184 development hours, per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning
  • 19. $18,583 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 20. Development of Level 2 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: 184 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: $18,583 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 21. Level 3 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 22. Development of Level 3 - eLearning How is Level 3 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 23. Development of Level 3 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges NOTE: Several respondents listed times greater than 2000+ hours of development per finished hour (very advanced learning simulations and games) 716:1 490:1 217:1
  • 24. Development of Level 3 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 490 hours Based on average of 490 development hours, per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning
  • 25. Development of Level 3 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 3 eLearning? $50,371 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 26. Development of Level 3 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: 490 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: $50,371 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 28. Development Ratios - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
  • 29. Average Cost Comparisons - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
  • 30. Blended LearningBenchmark of Blended Learning Components
  • 31. Blended Learning Components Radar chart showing components most frequently used as part of a blended learning course (across all respondents)
  • 32. Blended Learning Components Components used most frequently as part of a blend
  • 33. Blended Learning Components Average mix of major components: Classroom, Virtual Classroom and E-Learning (survey respondents)
  • 34. Blended Learning What is the average size of a Blended Learning Course? …and what are organizations typically paying for internal development of blended learning (on average)? NOTE: These were asked as three separate questions. Components used in blend Typical length of blend Average cost of blend We realize that this data doesn’t mesh well with previous questions about development per finished hour ratios. If you average out the costs, it would seem to suggest that blended learning is created at a rate of $809 per finished hour ($25,900 divided by 32). We thought it would be helpful to share the data anyway. Please understand these constraints when interpreting the data $25,900 Average Duration 32 hours Average Configuration
  • 35.
  • 36. finding and applying learning industry research; custom research projects
  • 37. optimizing or establishing your learning governance approach
  • 38. exploring best practices for rapid learning development
  • 39. learning strategy “jam sessions” (available as a 2-hour block, full-day onsite, or as a workshop)
  • 40. Click here for more available servicesContact information: Bryan Chapman Chief Learning Strategist Chapman Alliance (801) 568-7011 bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com