Cross Media
 Ownership
What is Media Ownership?
• All Media products are owned by a
  particular producer.
• Bauer produce Heat magazine
• News Corporation produce The Sun
• New Line Cinema produced Lord of
  the Rings
Legal Ownership
• Each of these producers has legal ownership
  of the particular media text they produce
• This means that they profit from the
  distribution of the media text.
• They are also legally responsible for its
  content (complaints, regulation, legal action)
Historical Media Ownership
• Historically, Media ownership was reasonably
  restricted
• Media producers tended to stick to one
  channel of distribution (film, TV, radio,
  magazine)
• The producers were smaller, specialist
  companies
1980s – What changed?
• Since the 1980s, the world economic climate
  has altered rapidly, with companies either
  merging or being taken over by other
  companies with similar interests.
• This happened in all industries and not just
  Media.
• Bigger companies = bigger profits
1980s onwards Media
• As well as the economic changes, the Media
  industry has changed rapidly in the last 20
  years.
• Since the late 1980s, the technology available
  to distribute Media texts has exploded.
• This has impacted upon the companies that
  produce these texts.
1980s onwards Media
• To take advantage of the changing technology,
  Media companies have seen a significant
  amount of merger, takeover and buyout.
• IPC now owned by Time Warner (originally 2
  companies, Time and Warner Brothers)
• New Line Cinema now owned by Disney
Cross Media Ownership
• As a result of the size of the companies which
  now operate, they are able to diversify into
  more than one Media area.
• IPC – Film/Magazine/News/TV
• The term to describe this is CROSS MEDIA
  OWNERSHIP
Cross Media Ownership - Advantages
• 1) Reduced Costs – big companies have more
  purchasing power (think Tesco) and produce
  products at a reduced cost.
• They can then either pass on this reduction to
  the consumer or increase their profit margins.
• 2) Synergy – they are able to pool the
  resources of the underlying companies to
  produce a better product at a reduced cost
Cross Media Ownership - Advantages
• 3) Wider distribution – the markets into which
  the media text can be distributed are
  increased – bigger audience = bigger profit
• 4) Business Security – the diversity of the
  products on offer increases the security of the
  business – one market fails, can focus on
  another – think Sony
Cross Media Ownership – Disadvantages –
             Media Power
• The Media is very persuasive – much of this
  persuasive power lies in the hands of fewer
  producers. Bias and partiality severely
  restricted.
• Campaign for Press Freedom: ‘When media
  are concentrated in the hands of powerful
  proprieters deep damage can be inflicted on
  democratic societies.’
Cross Media Ownership – Disadvantages –
             Media Power
• The issue was again raised in parliament in 2008
  when a Lords Select Committee investigates these
  concerns.
• They concluded that ‘It is possible for one voice to
  become too powerful’ and that any future mergers
  need to be carefully scrutinised by the government.
• They also insisted that the current system of
  regulation remain to protect media recipients.
• Many believe little has changed.
Cross Media Ownership – other
               disadvantages
• Privacy – massive databases of personal information
• Flow of Information – information providers control
  selection, organisation and flow of information.
• Time Warner own 1,000,000,000 Google shares.
  Google own You Tube. ITV own Facebook.
• Branding – media texts become part of a brand and
  lose their individual status.
Cross Media Ownership
              Conclusion
• There are both advantages and disadvantages
  of this global change.
• What is clear is that change is happening
  NOW.
• TASK = Rewrite your Ownership section of
  your Learned Response now to take into
  account what you have learnt today.

Cross media ownership

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What is MediaOwnership? • All Media products are owned by a particular producer. • Bauer produce Heat magazine • News Corporation produce The Sun • New Line Cinema produced Lord of the Rings
  • 3.
    Legal Ownership • Eachof these producers has legal ownership of the particular media text they produce • This means that they profit from the distribution of the media text. • They are also legally responsible for its content (complaints, regulation, legal action)
  • 4.
    Historical Media Ownership •Historically, Media ownership was reasonably restricted • Media producers tended to stick to one channel of distribution (film, TV, radio, magazine) • The producers were smaller, specialist companies
  • 5.
    1980s – Whatchanged? • Since the 1980s, the world economic climate has altered rapidly, with companies either merging or being taken over by other companies with similar interests. • This happened in all industries and not just Media. • Bigger companies = bigger profits
  • 6.
    1980s onwards Media •As well as the economic changes, the Media industry has changed rapidly in the last 20 years. • Since the late 1980s, the technology available to distribute Media texts has exploded. • This has impacted upon the companies that produce these texts.
  • 7.
    1980s onwards Media •To take advantage of the changing technology, Media companies have seen a significant amount of merger, takeover and buyout. • IPC now owned by Time Warner (originally 2 companies, Time and Warner Brothers) • New Line Cinema now owned by Disney
  • 8.
    Cross Media Ownership •As a result of the size of the companies which now operate, they are able to diversify into more than one Media area. • IPC – Film/Magazine/News/TV • The term to describe this is CROSS MEDIA OWNERSHIP
  • 9.
    Cross Media Ownership- Advantages • 1) Reduced Costs – big companies have more purchasing power (think Tesco) and produce products at a reduced cost. • They can then either pass on this reduction to the consumer or increase their profit margins. • 2) Synergy – they are able to pool the resources of the underlying companies to produce a better product at a reduced cost
  • 10.
    Cross Media Ownership- Advantages • 3) Wider distribution – the markets into which the media text can be distributed are increased – bigger audience = bigger profit • 4) Business Security – the diversity of the products on offer increases the security of the business – one market fails, can focus on another – think Sony
  • 11.
    Cross Media Ownership– Disadvantages – Media Power • The Media is very persuasive – much of this persuasive power lies in the hands of fewer producers. Bias and partiality severely restricted. • Campaign for Press Freedom: ‘When media are concentrated in the hands of powerful proprieters deep damage can be inflicted on democratic societies.’
  • 12.
    Cross Media Ownership– Disadvantages – Media Power • The issue was again raised in parliament in 2008 when a Lords Select Committee investigates these concerns. • They concluded that ‘It is possible for one voice to become too powerful’ and that any future mergers need to be carefully scrutinised by the government. • They also insisted that the current system of regulation remain to protect media recipients. • Many believe little has changed.
  • 13.
    Cross Media Ownership– other disadvantages • Privacy – massive databases of personal information • Flow of Information – information providers control selection, organisation and flow of information. • Time Warner own 1,000,000,000 Google shares. Google own You Tube. ITV own Facebook. • Branding – media texts become part of a brand and lose their individual status.
  • 14.
    Cross Media Ownership Conclusion • There are both advantages and disadvantages of this global change. • What is clear is that change is happening NOW. • TASK = Rewrite your Ownership section of your Learned Response now to take into account what you have learnt today.