Using Critical Thinking to Make
Better Business Decisions
Presented by: OnPoint Consulting
Rick Lepsinger, President
rlepsinger@OnPointConsultingLLC.com | 212.472.8081
Using Critical Thinking To Make
Better Business Decisions
WELCOME TO
3
Objectives
• Understand your style for
making decisions and how it
impacts your judgment and
the quality of your choices
• Learn strategies to strengthen
your critical thinking skills
4
Definition
Critical Thinking is the process of evaluating truthfulness
and value of information and opinions in a systematic,
purposeful, and efficient manner
• Some of the “short cuts” are:
 Seeking ideas and data that confirm what we already suspect
 Finding ideas and data provided by people we trust to be more
appealing than those of people we don’t trust
 Treating our own experience as evidence
 Blurring the line between what we feel to be the case and what we
know to be the case
5
Making Sense of the World
1. Think of someone you’ve worked
with who you believe is an
effective critical thinker.
2. What personal characteristics
and behaviors did you observe?
6
Chat Box: Effective Critical Thinkers
Focused
Open
minded
Flexible
Clear
Persistent in
seeking
information
Systematic
Specific
Fair
minded in
evaluation
Willing to
reconsider
Thorough
7
Question the Conventional
Precise
Prudent
Honest in
facing
biases
Well Informed
Inquisitive
• Availability: choosing solutions we are familiar with
• Hasty generalization: drawing inappropriate
conclusions from specific cases
• Anchoring: initial assumptions shape our subsequent
reasoning
8
Common Biases
• Confirmation: seeking only evidence that supports
our intuition before deciding
• Escalation of commitment: continuing to invest in a
failing course of action
9
Common Biases
10
Polling Question #1
“All the customers I spoke with are happy with our service; we
don’t need to make any changes.”
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
11
Polling Question #2
An individual investor is more likely to buy stocks of a company
that is often covered by media as opposed to stocks of a less
known company
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
12
Polling Question #2
An individual investor is more likely to buy stocks of a company
that is often covered by media as opposed to stocks of a less
known company
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
13
Polling Question #3
An employer who believes that a job applicant is highly
intelligent focuses on information that is consistent with that
belief.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
14
Polling Question #3
An employer who believes that a job applicant is highly
intelligent focuses on information that is consistent with that
belief.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
15
Polling Question #4
Motorola released the Iridium phone to the market in 1998 after 15 years of
R&D. The phone cost $3,000 and was literally the size of a brick. The company
continued to invest in this product, even when the market conditions changed
dramatically and the product lost its competitive edge.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
16
Polling Question #4
Motorola released the Iridium phone to the market in 1998 after 15 years of
R&D. The phone cost $3,000 and was literally the size of a brick. The company
continued to invest in this product, even when the market conditions changed
dramatically and the product lost its competitive edge.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
17
Polling Question #5
Mock jurors tend to vote to acquit a defendant when they are
shown information about the innocence of the defendant before
they see information about his or her guilt.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
18
Polling Question #5
Mock jurors tend to vote to acquit a defendant when they are
shown information about the innocence of the defendant before
they see information about his or her guilt.
Which bias does this example illustrate:
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
19
Polling Question #6
Which critical thinking mistakes do you observe being made most
frequently?
A. Availability
B. Hasty generalizations
C. Anchoring
D. Confirmation
E. Escalation of commitment
Critical Thinking skills can be improved significantly:
• By becoming well-informed and open to new experiences
• By checking one’s reasoning process
• By using systematically decision making models
20
Strategies for Improvement
21
Critical Thinking Model
Source: TalentLens, the Talent Assessment business of Pearson, the world’s leading learning company, develops selection and development assessment solutions for
the 21st century workforce.
22
RED Model: Recognizing
Assumptions –
Separating Fact From Opinion
23
Framing the issue and separating fact from opinionR
Recognize Assumptions
• What is the key issue/problem that you are trying to resolve?
• What information do you have about this issue?
• What are your ideas and assumptions that support your strategy or
plan?
• Is there solid evidence to support those assumptions, and what might
be some gaps in your reasoning?
• Who are the key stakeholders and what are their viewpoints?
• What other ideas should be explored, and what else do you need to
know?
24
Reframing Issues
Paraphrase:
• Initial: How can we reduce our shipping delays?
• Reframe: How can we ensure customers receive their orders on
time?
180˚ Turnaround:
• Initial: How can we encourage employees to follow the new
procedure?
• Reframe: What might we be doing that discourages employees
from following the new procedure?
25
Reframing Issues (cont.)
Broaden it:
• Initial: Should we expand our product line to China?
• Reframe: How can we achieve increased financial
success in China?
Redirect the problem:
• Initial: How can we increased our revenue?
• Reframe: How can we decrease our costs?
When product A was launched in India, TV commercials proved to be the
most effective marketing tool. That is why to support the launch of the
product in our market we should allocate most of the budget to TV
commercials.
Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption?
1. The two markets have similar consumer media preferences.
2. TV commercials that supported product A launch in India had the
highest ROI among media channels.
26
Recognize Assumptions Scenario #1
When product A was launched in India, TV commercials proved to be the
most effective marketing tool. That is why to support the launch of the
product in our market we should allocate most of the budget to TV
commercials.
Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption?
Assumption: The two markets have similar consumer media preferences.
Fact: TV commercials that supported product A launch in India had the
highest ROI among media channels.
27
Recognize Assumptions Scenario #1
I do not support telecommuting (e.g. working remotely) in our region. When we
tried to implement this a few years ago, the initiative failed because of
technology. People could not access the Intranet when away from office and the
narrow bandwidth made it impossible to hold virtual meetings.
Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption?
1. The issues that prevented the successful rollout of telecommuting previously
have not been resolved yet.
2. Access to necessary technology has a great impact on the effectiveness of
people working remotely.
28
Recognize Assumptions Scenario #2
I do not support telecommuting (e.g. working remotely) in our region. When we
tried to implement this a few years ago, the initiative failed because of
technology. People could not access the Intranet when away from office and the
narrow bandwidth made it impossible to hold virtual meetings.
Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption?
Assumption: The issues that prevented the successful rollout of telecommuting
previously have not been resolved yet.
Fact: Access to necessary technology has a great impact on the effectiveness of
people working remotely.
29
Recognize Assumptions Scenario #2
30
RED Model: Evaluating
Arguments – Analyzing
Information Objectively
31
Analyzing information, questioning quality of evidence,
recognizing the effect of emotions
Evaluate Arguments
• What are the pros and cons of the solution that you are proposing?
• What are your biases? Is there someone who has a different opinion
than yours that you could run your ideas by?
• What impact will your decision have on others?
• Who would disagree with your proposed solution? What is the
rationale that supports their viewpoint?
• What key points, models and/or perspectives do you need to keep in
mind as you evaluate the options?
• What will be the impact of your decision?
E
32
What If?
We got 101 complaints this month compared to only 73
last month. The Customer Service team is not effectively
doing its job.
Is this argument weak or strong?
33
Evaluate Arguments Scenario #1
We got 101 complaints this month compared to only 73
last month. The Customer Service team is not effectively
doing its job.
Is this argument weak or strong?
Argument is weak: The absolute number of complaints is not as
important as its proportion to all the requests processed. For example, it
is possible that the customer service team is now serving twice as many
customers. Then, in relative terms, they the number of complaints have
decreased.
34
Evaluate Arguments Scenario #1
We should remove the word “frozen” from the description of
our product. In blind taste tests 87% of consumers give top
ratings to our product while 78% of the same consumers rate
the same product unfavorably if they read the description that
says it is a frozen food prior to tasting.
Is this argument weak or strong?
35
Evaluate Arguments Scenario #2
We should remove the word “frozen” from the description of our product.
In blind taste tests 87% of consumers give top ratings to our product while
78% of the same consumers rate the same product unfavorably if they
read the description that says it is a frozen food prior to tasting.
Is this argument weak or strong?
Argument is strong: The argument establishes the link between the
consumers’ perception of frozen food and favorability. The fact that the
same customers were surveyed in two different trials reduces the chance
that other factors, like age, affected the conclusion.
36
Evaluate Arguments Scenario #2
37
More Data is Not Always Better
Decision criteria answer two questions:
• What will the best alternative look like?
• What are the characteristics of the alternative that will
accomplished our objective in the best way?
38
Use a Systematic Process: Decision Criteria
Decision Criteria Alternative One Alternative Two Alternative Three
Cost less than $450K
4 bedrooms and 2
bathrooms
Walking distance to
shopping
School district rated
in top 5
Large backyard
39
Example: Buying a House
Decision Criteria Alternative One Alternative Two Alternative Three
Cost less than $450K $400,000 $550,000 $300,000
4 bedrooms and 2
bathrooms
3 bedrooms and 2
bathrooms
4 bedrooms and 3
bathrooms
2 bedrooms and 2
bathrooms
Walking distance to
shopping
1 mile 1.5 miles .5 miles
School district rated
in top 5
Rated 7th Rated 1st Rated 3rd
Large backyard 1000 sq. ft. 1,600 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
40
Example: Buying a House
41
Do You Have Enough Data? The Right Data?
42
RED Model:
Drawing Conclusions That
Logically Follow the Available
Evidence
43
Bringing information together to arrive at logical
conclusion
Draw Conclusions
• After evaluating all of the facts, what is the best possible conclusion?
• What specific evidence is driving your conclusion?
• Is there new evidence that would impact your decision?
• What does your common sense and experience tell you to do?
• What is the timeline for making a decision?
• What opportunities does your conclusion provide?
• What risks are associated with your conclusion?
D
Decisions are not final:
• Are the new facts confirming the decision?
• Do we need to make any adjustments?
44
Keep an Open Mind
Unemployment among young professionals persists at 9%, which is
higher than the 10 year average of 5.7%. The number of employees
in the 1-3 years tenure group who intend to leave in the next 6
months has decreased by 15%.
Conclusion: Our company’s efforts to reduce turnover have been
successful
Does the conclusion follow?
45
Drawing Conclusions Scenario #1
Unemployment among young professionals persists at 9%, which is higher
than the 10 year average of 5.7%. The number of employees in the 1-3
years tenure group who intend to leave in the next 6 months has
decreased by 15%.
Conclusion: Our company’s efforts to reduce turnover have been
successful
Conclusion does not follow: It’s is possible that the economy played a
significant part in an employee’s decision to stay or leave, not just the
company’s initiatives.
46
Drawing Conclusions Scenario #1
The training budget has increased over the past 2 years. According to latest
HR report employee productivity has increased twofold over the same
period. The profile and skill level of incoming employees has remained the
same and management procedures have not changed significantly.
Conclusion: Enhanced training led to increase in productivity.
Does the conclusion follow?
47
Drawing Conclusions Scenario #2
The training budget has increased over the past 2 years. According to latest
HR report employee productivity has increased twofold over the same
period. The profile and skill level of incoming employees has remained the
same and management procedures have not changed significantly.
Conclusion: Enhanced training led to increase in productivity.
Conclusion follows: Since new employees were not significantly more
skilled and there were no other significant changes, it is likely that the
increased investment in training has impacted employee productivity.
48
Drawing Conclusions Scenario #2
Skills Behaviors Outcomes
• Distinguish fact from
opinion
• Seek multiple perspectives
• Recognize assumptions
• Identify bias and
persuasion
• Evaluate arguments for
relevance and accuracy
• Balance logic and emotion
• Asks questions that furthers
understanding
• Doesn’t draw hasty conclusions
• Considers all sides of an
argument
• Uses criteria to evaluate
information
• Can “push back” effectively
• Recognizes other people’s
agendas
• Adjusts assumptions in light of
new evidence
• Well-thought out decisions
based on a sound rationale
and evidence
• Information, conclusions
and decisions are revised as
new information becomes
available
• Decisions reflect “systems
thinking” rather than a
“silo” approach
49
Critical Thinking Summary
What will you do differently to enhance
your judgment and the quality of your
decisions?
50
Key Learnings
• Take time to understand and frame the issue
• Be aware of common cognitive biases and mistakes
• Thoroughly check your assumptions
• Diligently collect evidence and ask questions
51
Best Practices
• Seek disconfirming evidence and opinions
• Test the logic behind the conclusion
• Keep an open mind and be inquisitive
52
Best Practices
Help Your Leaders Make
Better Business Decisions
Learn more about our solutions to improve
decision making and strategy execution at
www.onpointconsultingllc.com/enhance-
execution
Or call us at 212.472.8081

Critical thinking-business-decisions

  • 1.
    Using Critical Thinkingto Make Better Business Decisions Presented by: OnPoint Consulting
  • 2.
    Rick Lepsinger, President rlepsinger@OnPointConsultingLLC.com| 212.472.8081 Using Critical Thinking To Make Better Business Decisions WELCOME TO
  • 3.
    3 Objectives • Understand yourstyle for making decisions and how it impacts your judgment and the quality of your choices • Learn strategies to strengthen your critical thinking skills
  • 4.
    4 Definition Critical Thinking isthe process of evaluating truthfulness and value of information and opinions in a systematic, purposeful, and efficient manner
  • 5.
    • Some ofthe “short cuts” are:  Seeking ideas and data that confirm what we already suspect  Finding ideas and data provided by people we trust to be more appealing than those of people we don’t trust  Treating our own experience as evidence  Blurring the line between what we feel to be the case and what we know to be the case 5 Making Sense of the World
  • 6.
    1. Think ofsomeone you’ve worked with who you believe is an effective critical thinker. 2. What personal characteristics and behaviors did you observe? 6 Chat Box: Effective Critical Thinkers
  • 7.
    Focused Open minded Flexible Clear Persistent in seeking information Systematic Specific Fair minded in evaluation Willingto reconsider Thorough 7 Question the Conventional Precise Prudent Honest in facing biases Well Informed Inquisitive
  • 8.
    • Availability: choosingsolutions we are familiar with • Hasty generalization: drawing inappropriate conclusions from specific cases • Anchoring: initial assumptions shape our subsequent reasoning 8 Common Biases
  • 9.
    • Confirmation: seekingonly evidence that supports our intuition before deciding • Escalation of commitment: continuing to invest in a failing course of action 9 Common Biases
  • 10.
    10 Polling Question #1 “Allthe customers I spoke with are happy with our service; we don’t need to make any changes.” Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 11.
    11 Polling Question #2 Anindividual investor is more likely to buy stocks of a company that is often covered by media as opposed to stocks of a less known company Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 12.
    12 Polling Question #2 Anindividual investor is more likely to buy stocks of a company that is often covered by media as opposed to stocks of a less known company Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 13.
    13 Polling Question #3 Anemployer who believes that a job applicant is highly intelligent focuses on information that is consistent with that belief. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 14.
    14 Polling Question #3 Anemployer who believes that a job applicant is highly intelligent focuses on information that is consistent with that belief. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 15.
    15 Polling Question #4 Motorolareleased the Iridium phone to the market in 1998 after 15 years of R&D. The phone cost $3,000 and was literally the size of a brick. The company continued to invest in this product, even when the market conditions changed dramatically and the product lost its competitive edge. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 16.
    16 Polling Question #4 Motorolareleased the Iridium phone to the market in 1998 after 15 years of R&D. The phone cost $3,000 and was literally the size of a brick. The company continued to invest in this product, even when the market conditions changed dramatically and the product lost its competitive edge. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 17.
    17 Polling Question #5 Mockjurors tend to vote to acquit a defendant when they are shown information about the innocence of the defendant before they see information about his or her guilt. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 18.
    18 Polling Question #5 Mockjurors tend to vote to acquit a defendant when they are shown information about the innocence of the defendant before they see information about his or her guilt. Which bias does this example illustrate: A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 19.
    19 Polling Question #6 Whichcritical thinking mistakes do you observe being made most frequently? A. Availability B. Hasty generalizations C. Anchoring D. Confirmation E. Escalation of commitment
  • 20.
    Critical Thinking skillscan be improved significantly: • By becoming well-informed and open to new experiences • By checking one’s reasoning process • By using systematically decision making models 20 Strategies for Improvement
  • 21.
    21 Critical Thinking Model Source:TalentLens, the Talent Assessment business of Pearson, the world’s leading learning company, develops selection and development assessment solutions for the 21st century workforce.
  • 22.
    22 RED Model: Recognizing Assumptions– Separating Fact From Opinion
  • 23.
    23 Framing the issueand separating fact from opinionR Recognize Assumptions • What is the key issue/problem that you are trying to resolve? • What information do you have about this issue? • What are your ideas and assumptions that support your strategy or plan? • Is there solid evidence to support those assumptions, and what might be some gaps in your reasoning? • Who are the key stakeholders and what are their viewpoints? • What other ideas should be explored, and what else do you need to know?
  • 24.
    24 Reframing Issues Paraphrase: • Initial:How can we reduce our shipping delays? • Reframe: How can we ensure customers receive their orders on time? 180˚ Turnaround: • Initial: How can we encourage employees to follow the new procedure? • Reframe: What might we be doing that discourages employees from following the new procedure?
  • 25.
    25 Reframing Issues (cont.) Broadenit: • Initial: Should we expand our product line to China? • Reframe: How can we achieve increased financial success in China? Redirect the problem: • Initial: How can we increased our revenue? • Reframe: How can we decrease our costs?
  • 26.
    When product Awas launched in India, TV commercials proved to be the most effective marketing tool. That is why to support the launch of the product in our market we should allocate most of the budget to TV commercials. Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption? 1. The two markets have similar consumer media preferences. 2. TV commercials that supported product A launch in India had the highest ROI among media channels. 26 Recognize Assumptions Scenario #1
  • 27.
    When product Awas launched in India, TV commercials proved to be the most effective marketing tool. That is why to support the launch of the product in our market we should allocate most of the budget to TV commercials. Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption? Assumption: The two markets have similar consumer media preferences. Fact: TV commercials that supported product A launch in India had the highest ROI among media channels. 27 Recognize Assumptions Scenario #1
  • 28.
    I do notsupport telecommuting (e.g. working remotely) in our region. When we tried to implement this a few years ago, the initiative failed because of technology. People could not access the Intranet when away from office and the narrow bandwidth made it impossible to hold virtual meetings. Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption? 1. The issues that prevented the successful rollout of telecommuting previously have not been resolved yet. 2. Access to necessary technology has a great impact on the effectiveness of people working remotely. 28 Recognize Assumptions Scenario #2
  • 29.
    I do notsupport telecommuting (e.g. working remotely) in our region. When we tried to implement this a few years ago, the initiative failed because of technology. People could not access the Intranet when away from office and the narrow bandwidth made it impossible to hold virtual meetings. Which of the following is a fact and which is an assumption? Assumption: The issues that prevented the successful rollout of telecommuting previously have not been resolved yet. Fact: Access to necessary technology has a great impact on the effectiveness of people working remotely. 29 Recognize Assumptions Scenario #2
  • 30.
    30 RED Model: Evaluating Arguments– Analyzing Information Objectively
  • 31.
    31 Analyzing information, questioningquality of evidence, recognizing the effect of emotions Evaluate Arguments • What are the pros and cons of the solution that you are proposing? • What are your biases? Is there someone who has a different opinion than yours that you could run your ideas by? • What impact will your decision have on others? • Who would disagree with your proposed solution? What is the rationale that supports their viewpoint? • What key points, models and/or perspectives do you need to keep in mind as you evaluate the options? • What will be the impact of your decision? E
  • 32.
  • 33.
    We got 101complaints this month compared to only 73 last month. The Customer Service team is not effectively doing its job. Is this argument weak or strong? 33 Evaluate Arguments Scenario #1
  • 34.
    We got 101complaints this month compared to only 73 last month. The Customer Service team is not effectively doing its job. Is this argument weak or strong? Argument is weak: The absolute number of complaints is not as important as its proportion to all the requests processed. For example, it is possible that the customer service team is now serving twice as many customers. Then, in relative terms, they the number of complaints have decreased. 34 Evaluate Arguments Scenario #1
  • 35.
    We should removethe word “frozen” from the description of our product. In blind taste tests 87% of consumers give top ratings to our product while 78% of the same consumers rate the same product unfavorably if they read the description that says it is a frozen food prior to tasting. Is this argument weak or strong? 35 Evaluate Arguments Scenario #2
  • 36.
    We should removethe word “frozen” from the description of our product. In blind taste tests 87% of consumers give top ratings to our product while 78% of the same consumers rate the same product unfavorably if they read the description that says it is a frozen food prior to tasting. Is this argument weak or strong? Argument is strong: The argument establishes the link between the consumers’ perception of frozen food and favorability. The fact that the same customers were surveyed in two different trials reduces the chance that other factors, like age, affected the conclusion. 36 Evaluate Arguments Scenario #2
  • 37.
    37 More Data isNot Always Better
  • 38.
    Decision criteria answertwo questions: • What will the best alternative look like? • What are the characteristics of the alternative that will accomplished our objective in the best way? 38 Use a Systematic Process: Decision Criteria
  • 39.
    Decision Criteria AlternativeOne Alternative Two Alternative Three Cost less than $450K 4 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms Walking distance to shopping School district rated in top 5 Large backyard 39 Example: Buying a House
  • 40.
    Decision Criteria AlternativeOne Alternative Two Alternative Three Cost less than $450K $400,000 $550,000 $300,000 4 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms 4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms Walking distance to shopping 1 mile 1.5 miles .5 miles School district rated in top 5 Rated 7th Rated 1st Rated 3rd Large backyard 1000 sq. ft. 1,600 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. 40 Example: Buying a House
  • 41.
    41 Do You HaveEnough Data? The Right Data?
  • 42.
    42 RED Model: Drawing ConclusionsThat Logically Follow the Available Evidence
  • 43.
    43 Bringing information togetherto arrive at logical conclusion Draw Conclusions • After evaluating all of the facts, what is the best possible conclusion? • What specific evidence is driving your conclusion? • Is there new evidence that would impact your decision? • What does your common sense and experience tell you to do? • What is the timeline for making a decision? • What opportunities does your conclusion provide? • What risks are associated with your conclusion? D
  • 44.
    Decisions are notfinal: • Are the new facts confirming the decision? • Do we need to make any adjustments? 44 Keep an Open Mind
  • 45.
    Unemployment among youngprofessionals persists at 9%, which is higher than the 10 year average of 5.7%. The number of employees in the 1-3 years tenure group who intend to leave in the next 6 months has decreased by 15%. Conclusion: Our company’s efforts to reduce turnover have been successful Does the conclusion follow? 45 Drawing Conclusions Scenario #1
  • 46.
    Unemployment among youngprofessionals persists at 9%, which is higher than the 10 year average of 5.7%. The number of employees in the 1-3 years tenure group who intend to leave in the next 6 months has decreased by 15%. Conclusion: Our company’s efforts to reduce turnover have been successful Conclusion does not follow: It’s is possible that the economy played a significant part in an employee’s decision to stay or leave, not just the company’s initiatives. 46 Drawing Conclusions Scenario #1
  • 47.
    The training budgethas increased over the past 2 years. According to latest HR report employee productivity has increased twofold over the same period. The profile and skill level of incoming employees has remained the same and management procedures have not changed significantly. Conclusion: Enhanced training led to increase in productivity. Does the conclusion follow? 47 Drawing Conclusions Scenario #2
  • 48.
    The training budgethas increased over the past 2 years. According to latest HR report employee productivity has increased twofold over the same period. The profile and skill level of incoming employees has remained the same and management procedures have not changed significantly. Conclusion: Enhanced training led to increase in productivity. Conclusion follows: Since new employees were not significantly more skilled and there were no other significant changes, it is likely that the increased investment in training has impacted employee productivity. 48 Drawing Conclusions Scenario #2
  • 49.
    Skills Behaviors Outcomes •Distinguish fact from opinion • Seek multiple perspectives • Recognize assumptions • Identify bias and persuasion • Evaluate arguments for relevance and accuracy • Balance logic and emotion • Asks questions that furthers understanding • Doesn’t draw hasty conclusions • Considers all sides of an argument • Uses criteria to evaluate information • Can “push back” effectively • Recognizes other people’s agendas • Adjusts assumptions in light of new evidence • Well-thought out decisions based on a sound rationale and evidence • Information, conclusions and decisions are revised as new information becomes available • Decisions reflect “systems thinking” rather than a “silo” approach 49 Critical Thinking Summary
  • 50.
    What will youdo differently to enhance your judgment and the quality of your decisions? 50 Key Learnings
  • 51.
    • Take timeto understand and frame the issue • Be aware of common cognitive biases and mistakes • Thoroughly check your assumptions • Diligently collect evidence and ask questions 51 Best Practices
  • 52.
    • Seek disconfirmingevidence and opinions • Test the logic behind the conclusion • Keep an open mind and be inquisitive 52 Best Practices
  • 53.
    Help Your LeadersMake Better Business Decisions Learn more about our solutions to improve decision making and strategy execution at www.onpointconsultingllc.com/enhance- execution Or call us at 212.472.8081

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Welcome/introductions Session will cover some of the key topics related to trust in a virtual setting. This work comes out of more than 10 years of research and consulting on virtual teams, which is further outlined in our recent book, Virtual Team Success. We have tried to make it fairly interactive. We will not cover every single page in workbook but it is a very useful reference.
  • #8 Delphi report, table 5, p.14 (dispositional and issue specific characteristics)
  • #9 Source: Baldwin,T. T. , Bommer, W. H. & Rubin, R. S. (2007). Developing managerial skills: what great managers know and do. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • #10 Source: Baldwin,T. T. , Bommer, W. H. & Rubin, R. S. (2007). Developing managerial skills: what great managers know and do. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • #25 Defining the problem is one of the most important steps in critical thinking. The key objective is to ensure that you are working on the correct problem. Reframing is an effective method to explore the problem from all angles and to get to the bottom of the issue before moving to solve it.