The history of life is very ancient, that is, millions of years. During such a long period of time, innumerable species continued to occur. How come there is so much variety in it? Where did it come from? Some of what is produced is destroyed, and some that is (and still is!) Grows from one type of organism to another. The similarities between the two are sometimes significant and some are not. If the speed of some transitions is too slow to breathe The rush to change for just a few days! Some live in a certain area and some are so widespread everywhere! How did this gigantic mountain range of biodiversity come to be? Why produce diversity? When and how fast? What are the pressures in nature for such changes to take place? What is the nature of these pressures? What is their strength? Answers to such questions are not always found in descriptive and categorical systems.

1. Creation-vision: Formulas of evolution!
The history of life is very ancient, that is, millions of years. During such a long period of time,
innumerable species continued to occur.
Darwin's formulaic answers to why biodiversity is produced are still applicable today.
The history of life is very ancient, that is, millions of years. During such a long period of time,
innumerable species continued to occur. How come there is so much variety in it? Where
did it come from? Some of what is produced is destroyed, and some that is (and still is!)
Grows from one type of organism to another. The similarities between the two are
sometimes significant and some are not. If the speed of some transitions is too slow to
breathe The rush to change for just a few days! Some live in a certain area and some are so
widespread everywhere! How did this gigantic mountain range of biodiversity come to be?
Why produce diversity? When and how fast? What are the pressures in nature for such

2. changes to take place? What is the nature of these pressures? What is their strength?
Answers to such questions are not always found in descriptive and categorical systems.
Darwin made these problems his main goal. While dealing with the mountain of descriptive
history and facts in his time, he came across some clues. His first important observation
was this: It is not correct to assume that the present species is a component of past life.
They are not the elements of the past, they are the offspring of the living beings of the past.
Their Ancestors will often be completely extinct. E.g. Mankind evolved from apes. But the
ape species from which man evolved was different from that of our ancestor apes (e.g.
chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas).
Second formula: Although species evolve, their rate of evolution is not the same. There is no
one-size-fits-all calculation of how fast and when species will evolve. Some are tough
positionalists. E.g. Horseshoe crab, a tree of the genus Gingo. Devmasa or man
(accordingly) evolved rapidly. But look at the most ancient fish found in the Indian Ocean
called Kyola Kanth - nothing has changed. Such organisms are called 'living fossils'. Called.
But on average, the process of evolution is extremely slow. Some micro-organisms change
rapidly. E.g. Many bacteria and viruses. Some of them are fatal. So we look for barriers to
curb them. And they evolve and overcome it. This evolution between microbes and viruses
is often experienced by man under the microscope in his lifetime! True So this is convincing
evidence of evolution that can be seen with the naked eye.
The third formula: There are many pressures in nature to stimulate the evolution of living
things, to bring about change. In the face of such pressures, living beings strive to adapt to
changing conditions. The ones who are successful and who are built to be passed on to the
next generation are the ones who endure! The rest is destroyed. Adapting to a new situation
slows down the speed of evolution.

3. Fourth formula: The emergence of new and different species and the same ancestor are
two sides of the same coin. It is more natural that the ancestors of different species seem
to be the same. But from the same ancestors, the species emerges in the same way as the
branches of a tree. Why is there a qualitative gap between them? The branches of the same
tree cannot reproduce. What causes biological dislocation of these branches? On the one
hand, there are similarities between some of the key features or characteristics The special
problem was the separation of these branches and sub-branches, which differed completely
from the characteristics of many other buds. It is natural for the same tree to have branches
that produce the same kind of fruit; But on the same roots, the branches of different species
were a real wonder. This separation is the smoke of species bursting into the tree of life!
The title of his book, Origin of Species (Species), mentions 'Species' aka 'Species Type'.
Take a look at two small illustrations of how such species look like on a tree. Fig. No. The
letters X and Y in 1 represent two points. These points are native species viewers. A branch
grows near the point X. It is divided into two parts. One of them sprouts forth and produces
two forks. These two sub-branches represent the branches of Pali and Sarpa. Another fork
grows on X. As it slides forward, it cracks even more. This further divides Before the rupture,
one has the same ancestor, but he is not as alive and unknown as X. But the smoke from
the eruption found carnivorous dinosaur-like creatures such as the sauropodstheropods, as
well as birds such as emus, ostriches, and birds chirping on the other foot.
Figure 2 shows a pattern of the origin and discovery of similar qualities in the offspring of
these branches and shoots. The highlights of these paintings are the descriptions of the
features reflected in the smoke. This tree is lined up at the joints of certain common points.
At the same time, a more homogeneous group of species with these qualities is shown in
the compiled box at the top. Is. This picture is of a vertebrate branch of a vertebrate. Like all
other species, vertebrates are categorized by hierarchical structure. The animals on the
upper slopes come together only because of a few similar properties! If you look at the
more qualitative details, the similarities between them are declining. On the other hand, in
the lower layers of the slope, the merits of Sadhmra are higher It can only be done up to that

4. level. From an evolutionary point of view, fish, amphibians, mammals, and reptiles all have
the same spine. This vertebrate can be divided into two groups of animals.
Why a group of reptiles and mammals? Their eggs contain a special fluid-filled membrane
around the embryo in the egg. Such Embryos are called amniotic fluid in English. A similar
ancestor of theirs has passed away in relatively recent times. Hence the upper classification
in the picture is shown below the vertebrate, its lower layer is the amniotus aka embryo,
below which are shown two types of embryo - reptile and mammal. In this way a branch of a
living tree can be drawn on the basis of similarities and differences or similarities and
differences.
Such a characteristic slope and classification of living things can only happen in living
things. Classification of any commodity can be done. For example, what if people with a
hobby of collecting postage stamps came together and decided to take their collection and
classify it? Will be subjectively categorized according to value, ticket size or subject to be
voluntarily determined by whim, Not naturally objective!
More importantly, tickets do not evolve. Creatures that are a million times more diverse than
tickets did not happen on anyone's foreshadowing (‘design’). Its product is many physical
qualities and unknowingly happening material Life was unfolding. He did not have any
preconceived notions or conceptual plan, nor did he have any 'doer'!